The Lying Bunch of Evil Bastards lied to Professor Nick Hardwick who was not told by HMP Swansea that South Wales Police had ordered my denial of two urgent hospital appointments and access to the high court whilst unrepresented  and trying to cover it up by the  blocking of  my prison wing telephone communications with key Mackenzie Friends, including Sabine McNeil, herself now Subject to a restraining order. Witnesses for pending civil and criminal courts arising from 25 years of welsh police persecution of plain bullying were also denied communication during my prison periods simply designed to blackmailing me into using a lawyer.

Professor Nick Hardwick

UK’s HM Parole Board Chairman

Victims Unite Queen Bee

Unlawfully gagged Sabine McNeil, another victim of 1997 Blair badly drafted Prevention of Harassment Act just for the wife and others to coin in the easy tax payer’s money

14 10 07 P 10 HM Prison Inspectorate Redacted Complaint List

14 10 07 P4 HMPrisons Inspectorate Complaint List Part 2

14 10 08 P12 HMPrisoc ns Inspectorate Part 3

14 10 15 P12 HM Prisons Inspectorate Part 4

14 10 15 P12 BS Position Statement Part 5

17 07 12 Parole Futher Particulars Pt1 

InvokerServlet

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:41 AM

Subject: Fw: Psychiatric report on Maurice Kirk by Dr XX

Nelson:

This Maurice Kirk is yet another who seeks justice against a specific case of blatant judicial corruption in Britain. <SNIP> Here is the sinister report by a State psychiatrist being used to silence him.

Chris

—– Forwarded Message —- From: To: Various.

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:07:49 AM Subject: RE: Psychiatric report on Maurice Kirk by Dr XX

AN EXTRACT FROM THE PSYCHIATRIST’S REPORT ON MAURICE KIRK.

LEGAL.

“Paragraph 32. Maurice Kirk’s history is complex, convoluted and difficult to understand. The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties, (poor writing and spelling).. He developed a personality characterised by narcissism (abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to him) and paranoia (believing he is the victim of persecution). He also shows evidence of poor judgement, impetuosity and a willingness to hold himself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment. Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed Maurice Kirk’s life, and probably had a negative effect on his social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout his life. However, Maurice Kirk and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years his functioning has deteriorated and that his beliefs have become more intense and that his beliefs have become more intense and overwhelming and at times, to no others, and purely act normal. Maurice Kirk now shows clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes. The specific area of brain damage affects his ability to monitor and control his behaviour, decreases self awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded his paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, his beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature).

“Paragraph 33. With regard to treatment neither Maurice Kirk’s underlying personalities or brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of his clearly abnormal beliefs, as opposed to his general paranoid view of the world, it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, tough it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication has been offered to Maurice Kirk which he has refused.

“Paragraph 34. Clinically it is unclear whether Maurice Kirk’s brain damage is likely to progress. Should it be so his difficulties will become more marked and he will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.

“Paragraph 35. With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is almost impossible to consider Maurice Kirk’s risk in isolation from those he encourages to act on his behalf. The risk of Maurice Kirk continuing his action against South Wales Police and acting in a way that he feels justified to achieve his ends is high, but whether Maurice Kirk himself would be involved in inter personal violence is less, it cannot be discounted nor is the risk that others would act violently with his encouragement. If Maurice Kirk’s condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase over time.”

CLINICAL.

“Paragraph 36. I have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of the plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk’s mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self awareness, judgement, decision making, self regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty in organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence.”

“Paragraph 37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court, I would consider him a fit person to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant features.

“Paragraph 38. Maurice Kirk’s current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the criminal justice system, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with mental health services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.

“Paragraph 39. I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulties for the court.. I am also aware of the difficulties that the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk’s perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk request in patient hospital treatment. I have concerns that a medium secure unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff, because of the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a high security hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of specific security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk’s communications with the encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.

“Paragraph 40.

Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit.”

By 13th August 2017 Maurice had now spent over three years in prison from these MAPPA category 3 level 3 concocted lies. These concocted lies had been the result  of Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable, having had to sign her false 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit if she was to save her pension.

Her fairy tale affidavit  stated that Maurice had received all the relevant disclosure of police records relating to her thirty three failed malicious prosecutions against him.

The South Wales Police similarly fabricated 2009 MAPPA Maurice Kirk medical records, to avoid the already doomed machine-gun trial that was all before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC on 2nd December 2009. These medical records continue to be withheld from their victim for fear of civil redress for substantial damages finishing up in The Royal Courts of Justice.

The Cardiff courts now, owing to some  of these medical records having been written without even examining their purported patient or written without appropriate qualifications, even caused the perversion of justice even at the Criminal Court of Appeal before Lord Justice Leverson and Mr Justice Males.

13 RO RCJ Appeal Page 1

RO RCJ Appeal Page 2

13 03 RO ECJ appeal Page 3

Blackmailed XX’ Maurice Kirk Caswell clinic medical  report

09 10 23 US Psychiatrist e-mail

Cardiff Crown Court deliberately misled their Lordships on their visit to sit in the welsh court by withholding  the part of the transcript recording when the jury handed the trial judge a ‘jury note’ in order to cover up the clerk, Michael Williams, immune to to prosecution as on the HM job for life’ payroll.

The jury specifically asked for sight of the recording of both the service of 1st December 2011 restraining order and also that Maurice  had been taken back to the prison due to severe rectal bleeding. ( damage resulting from the cache of essential legal papers stored per rectum due to successive corrupt Cardiff Crown court judges refusing my legal papers in court in the hope I may employ a local layer.

Cardiff courts are renowned for not just having police ‘plants’ on the jury, as in the 2012  collapsed machine-gun jury trial, as eleven of the jury were so convinced about but also bent defence teams being ‘leaned on’, for a favour or otherwise to slip any sensitive material to the prosecution. Their purpose is to warn and therefore avoid the exposure of either in their ‘gravy train’ scam, at tax payer’s expense, a police officer caught lying in the witness box or lawyer in the well of the court also doing what he was trained for.

Only this month in Isleworth Crown, London, in R v S Oraki & R Oraki, I watched this game of theirs being acted with three bent police officers, Nash, Harding and Furneaux, before Judge Hill-Smith QC, clearly protected from imprisonment.  All said, on oath, the rim of the wheel was no more than a centimetre from the road surface despite video, taken with other police present, proved no defect on the rear tyre, what so ever.

Its known as ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’, daily and why our corrupt judicial processes, as above must gain a Brexit or their tax payer funded ‘gravy train ‘ will de-rail.

Returning to the stench of a Cardiff court room, Maurice was also deliberately denied the sight of a ‘jury note’ because of it’s incriminating content……note the cctv reference…..Maurice was specifically videoed 24/7 as a MAPPA 3/3 police victim .

Remember, Cardiff magistrates had deliberately never served the 1st December 2011 Dr XX restraining order in the first place in order to have Maurice gaoled for 9 months for ‘breaching’ it.

A constantly repeated manoeuvre from Cardiff cabal’s thick book of dirty tricks is to cover up their original 1993 police conspiracy in order to have Maurice extradited back to Guernsey. That damages claim is only now with Cardiff’s corrupt county court, 23 years later, which quickly confiscated the reel to reel tape when Maurice was found to be in the position, now, to play his police interview tape that never carried a prisoner caution for their dreamed up ‘indictable offence’.

Maurice had been locked up for being in possession of ‘a garrotte type’ instrument jused used on HRH Prince Charles’ farm.

Cardiff Court clerk with my confiscated property

To await Channel Islands extradition police lied to the May 1993 court, keeping him in prison for four days, by saying, “Kirk cannot be identified” despite being arrested right out side his veterinary surgery with clients complaining!

Numerous Cardiff civil and criminal judges have deliberately covered up this conspiracy,  ever since, when it only needed one to ‘come clean’

The Cardiff judge who buried my ‘tape’

This little ‘shit’, Judge Richard Thomlow, was the then bent HM Crown Prosecutor in the 2010 police concocted machine-gun jury trial. We watched him before the very amused, by then, jury while he frantically tried to hide the DH2 Farnborough flown aircraft’s log books under his court papers, on his desk,for know one to see immediately following my ‘gently touched on’ simple fact of the decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine gun being a lawful possession.

In 1997 Viv Bellamy, who married Mr Fairy’s daughter, also an old friend in those days, had decommissioned no less than five at the same time now on WW1 aircraft and at the time of the trial, one being even on a Sopwith in RAF museum Hendon. to add to the evilness in South Wales against the English even nine in the pub afterwards (for their £1000 each) remarked that 11 of the jury’s decisions were made up on the first day of evidence once four police officers had been cross examined and they heard, wait for or it, both the Dorset museum owner, who sold the aircraft and the museum owner in Lincoln, that bought her, were not locked up but would be ‘prosecution witnesses’

The ‘icing on the cake’, if further proof of the Cardiff cabal’s conduct against an Englishman was really needed, was when they used a male police officer behind a screen, for jury identity only, called ‘Foxy’  pretending to have been the female police officer who had telephoned both my then wife and myself when ‘attempting to by the relic.

Police, incidentally, had painted the gun all black for trial as I had owned her but the buyer, before trial, had painted her part grey. Police could not even get the right shade of grey back on her , all at Lincoln hangar laughed as they told me, when the gun had to be returned by the police having failed to goal me of the compulsory 10 years.

Post Brexit will allow this conduct to spread the length and breadth of the UK, mark my words, as there will be no proper protection from ECHR.

Apart from lying to judge Bidder QC, in that my brain was so damaged by a possible tumour, it had given his bitch chief constable the right, by armed helicopter on 20th June 2009, to raid our house with twenty odd police and snatch our 10 ten year old to be taken into care by the Country council……..anything to disrupt the civil damages claim against them for over sixty odd failed malicious prosecutions

Retired Chief Constable

Recently this conduct was crowned by the obviously HM ‘leaned on’ Recorder of Cardiff by her siding with the original 2012 bent trial and appeal judges, His Honour Judge John Curran, when ruling the jury note was not relevant and ‘harassment appeal judge, His Honour Judge Hughes, refusing obviously needed police, prison, Geoamey and court records disclosure in that no restraining order could have been in existence at the time both clerk of the court and goal manager stated the time service; took place,

The Recorder of Cardiff HHJ Eleri Rees

HHJ Hughes QC

As with Curran he also allowed my access to my witnesses or legal papers to be in court for the 1st March 2012 ‘harassment ‘ appeal when even my main witness on crutches was attacked by Dr XX’ wife, anything to cover up the multiple conspiracy acted out in her Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison where , for three months, Maurice had never been so terrified and for so long.

Bloody Liar Judge John Curran caught on tape in my 1st jury trial, on 4th May 2012, after all having been subjected to the lies of the clerk of the court that, in the 1st Dec 2009 harassment trial, he saw the final version served in the corridor totally contradicting the evidence from The similar bloody liar, Geoamey custody manger Lee Barker, telling the jury he served the final restraining order in my cell!

That could not have been even typed at that time of day if we believe the evidence of the bent CPS barrister David Gareth Evans from the witness box in Bristol’s Crown Court three years later.  He said it had been  his part hand written restraining order taken to my cell for consultation as is always the case in ‘restraining orders’.

So what on earth were Their Lordships given in paperwork, in my 14th March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal application, to deliberate upon if not knowing the jury, not only asked the obvious in writing but that they were lied to just as they were in my  machine-gun trial by Judge Paul Thomas and CPE now judge Richard Tomlow and to a jury since.

Founder member’s tie of the notorious Guernsey’s ‘Ragged Dissident Society’ who’s members like Gerald and Yvonne Gillow, Spencer and Janet Gelsthorpe and Paul Griffiths  exposed , so well, the wide spread accepted corruption in the administration from UK’s HM Partnership ultimately responsible for the Bailiwick’s good government.

So what really goes on in our UK law courts, as in  in Wales and not just in a corrupt tax haven where ECHR is not recognised?

FAO

President of the HM Parole Board

14th August 2017

Dear Nick Hardwick,

My Illegal Swansea Prison Incarceration

You may recall we met in HMP Swansea, in 2014, following my correspondence over the South Wales Police illegally ordering the doubling of my prison term as I was deemed, by Barbara Wilding, as a MAPPA level 3 category 3 registered very dangerous person.

My eight month prison sentence, for breaching a Dr XX restraining order never served on me, was identical to any IPP (imprisonment for public protection).

My favourite prison’s comment was by the Swansea prison staff  saying that no psychiatrist in South Wales was prepared to sit on my parole board, for instant release, to contradict Dr XX police and Ministry of Justice prepare whether I could ‘safely’ be returned to society.

Your words on  that BBC program, back in 2014, predicting my destiny rang true.

InvokerServlet

14 09 11 MAPPA blocked Swansea Prison Tel Calls

17 08 16 T20170239 Disclosure and payment appl.