Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>16:56 (4 minutes ago) to selaine.saxby.mp@parliament.uk Dear Ms Saxby, Thankyou for previous work in obtaining my personalty from Park prison even if they never bothered to reply to you! I have those bullies (G4S) in court now on 4th December in Bristol court BUT I went to our now PM’s Exeter meeting only to find later the Taunton Conservative Party office had spitefully, apparently, struck my name from membership. As a temporary resident in your constituency please help me to have my membership stored and if impossible, why no? I visited your Barnstable office for the purpose and spoke to your staff on the matter. Thankyou– Maurice J Kirk BV Tel 07708586202                   www.kirkflyingvet.com

I have not received my ballot papers to vote for our next PM by 5pm today

https://wordpress.com/post/mauricejohnkirk.com/20611

But no one has told me why and where have my membership monies gone?

I telephoned, wrote and even visited my Conservative Head Office in Westminster for explanations, if not just out of spite but I was still ignored. So, when too late today, I was told it was my Taunton office that had blocked my membership renewal so was I surprised ?

And just who is still living off immoral earnings? — I asked the obvious, to Party HQ, for my money back and with ‘tongue in cheek’, my Party donations over these past 40 years but I was promptly cut off!

Police officers ‘taking to the knee’ – – what on earth is happening to our England?

St Vran

Nearby for £130,000 4 bed town residence

1. Their judicial system is rotten to the core
2. Their custodial system is regularly in breach of Article 3
3. Their bullying South Wales Police is shown to be accountable to no one.
4. Their Caswell Clinic had deceitful doctors, to have me imprisoned on their knowingly false unqualified medical reports, while those ultimately responsible stood idly by and did nothing.

Over 40 of their failed malicious criminal prosecutions resulted in a string of corrupt Welsh judges refusing compensation for their police conduct or for the return of thousands of pounds worth of my property stolen under false pretences. Judges Timothy Petts and Seys Lewellyn to name just two.

The welshing authorities lost 89% of their 130 odd criminal allegations aimed at me resulting in years of unlawful incarceration simply to prejudice my on-going civil claims for compensation.

When I finally managed to get out of Wales to a civilised country, England in November 2019, the Welsh police had even falsified my forensic history for other police forces, including the fabricated criminal convictions for ‘child abuse’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘firearms’ offenses. (Now expunged from the record upon HM Parole Board investigation.

This latter spineless Welsh authorities act not only caused my M5 roadside arrest by a vicious police officer, showing off to the police women also in attendance but proceeded to viciously slam on handcuffs to maximum possible tightness as the South Wales Police, was heard over the radio, I was ‘violent and likely to try and escape’.

The very same phrase had been written back in the 70’s, for a jury trial for alleged ‘theft’ for which I was acquitted, by the then Chief Superintendent ‘Curly’ Hawkins at Taunton police station upon finding that his personal pocket notebook was ‘missing’ from his office, 3^rd draw down on the left (with the broken brass handle).

He had just told the Taunton magistrates, on oath, he had personally conducted the biggest man hunt for me in Taunton which they found not even to be recorded in his personal pocket note book!

This very same phrase, violent and likely to try and escape’, has been seen written in subsequent court and custody records in both England and Wales decades later.

I have been recently gaoled only to be acquitted of all allegations for writing two anthrax like powdered filled letters, a year apart, purportedly to the bone-idle lying Member of Parliament, saying it was an act of ‘stalking’ contrary to the 1997 Harassment Act.

 The letters to an MP, apparently, referred to the prison breaches of Article 3 during the summer of 2019 when staff stood idly by while human faeces and buckets of urine were being thrown onto my bed in my prison cell. The ‘first’ letter, the jury was told, contained a mysterious ‘white powder’ when opened by the recipient.

But prison law is clear on this that a prisoner cannot be guilty of any offence with regards to posting a letter to his MP, containing a noxious substance, as each letter is first examined by a prison officer before it is sealed and in my case, as a MAPPA victim, the extra safe guard by the South Wales Police also monitoring my correspondence, telephone calls and movements 24/7 while in or out of prison.

None of my letters were answered over a four-year period to the lazy and deceitful MP, ‘living off immoral earnings’ a court heard I am now told.

Readers are invited to the current on going 1CF03361 South Wales Police civil litigation, currently on appeal, resulting from my 2010 acquittal when charged of ‘trading in machine-guns’ carrying a mandatory minimum ten-year prison term denied, of course, for the hearing to be in England.

G4S Parc prison not only blocked my letters to the RCJ, family and others they were seen doing it by other prisoners and myself piling them up for some to be returned on release!

The film prop, prosecution exhibit AJR 1, a look alike 1916 Lewis machine gun bolted on my 2000 Farnborough Air-show display Battle of the Somme replica biplane, was deemed as a ‘prohibited weapon’ by the South Wales Police but not by the Nottinghamshire police who deemed it a piece of harm piece of scrap! Despite that I was gaoled for eight months on remand until the obvious  to be acquittal before a Cardiff Crown Court jury.

Provenance of the item was never explored by the South Wales Police, of course, as a simple look down the smooth not rifled barrel alone disclosed it was a condemned barrel of 0.40 single shot shot-gun  with no gas vents needed if it had been a machine-gun or a port for receiving the 303 or 300 rounds from the rotating magazine on the top.

To date the South Wales Police have been presented, meaning you, with a fabricated one million pound legal bill within the Welsh cabal, by Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, Cardiff solicitors but only achieved by two particularly wicked Cardiff County court judges, Timothy Petts and Seys Lewellyn who excelled themselves in unlawful conduct simply for personal gratification.

Aspects of this widespread welshing skulduggery were already before well over 20 odd other Cardiff court judges, throughout 2009/10 and since, in that ALL would have known or ought to have known the heart of this particular police conspiracy was as follows:

1. The item (prosecution exhibit AJR1) had left my possession at least 8/9 months before my arrest as it had been sold to another aircraft enthusiast who was not even interviewed or prosecuted by the South Wales Police over the modifications he had carried out on it

• The item was then first examined by the Nottinghamshire police and deemed not a gun.

• The item, once in the hands of the South Wales Police, failed to identify any component part of the item as part of a ‘prohibited weapon’ as the June 2010 decommissioning certificate confirmed. Police confirmed, while I was in possession of it in 2008 despite Home Office regulations stating the correct procedure, also proved the police were again lying.

• That is why the Welsh police refused to disclose the HO regulations of filming of the item while being methodically stripped down. Huxtable at police HQ especially and lied over his handling of  it the jury were so quick to hear and understand they told me.  

• Cardiff trial judge, Paul Thomas, of course, flatly refused to allow either myself or my gun expert, waiting in court, to examine the item letting the proverbial ‘cat out of the bag’ as the jury told me in the pub after the acquittal that this was not just deceitful coppers numerous senior judiciary and Criminal Prosecution Service members were also lying.

• The police quickly gaoled an observer in the public gallery for publishing the full name of the police ‘plant’ on the jury identified by the eight of the jury in the Cardiff pub. The police spy had refused to discuss the case at all in the jury room and always voted ‘guilty’ when a count was taken.  

To be continued

N244 Application notice   For help in completing this form please read the notes for guidance form N244Notes.   Find out how HM Courts and Tribunals Service uses personal information you give them when you fill in a form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information- charter

Name of court County Court at Cardiff

Claim no. CF03361

Fee account no. (if applicable)

Help with Fees – Ref. no. (if applicable)

H

W

F

–

–

Warrant no. (if applicable)

Claimant’s name (including ref.) Maurice John Kirk

Defendant’s name (including ref.) Chief Constable of South Wales Police

Date12th Sept 2021                                                               sept2021

1.    What is your name or, if you are a legal representative, the name of your firm?

Maurice John Kirk

2.	Are you a	Claimant	Defendant	Legal Representative
		Other (please specify)	Applicant.
	If you are a legal representative whom do you represent?

3.    What order are you asking the court to make and why?

An Order for Specific Disclosure of documents as set out under CPR 32.12.and for the issuing of witness summonses.

4     Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for?                                                                                     3  Yes                                                                                    No

5.    How do you want to have this application dealt with?                                                                                     3  at a hearing                                                                                    without a hearing

                                                                                           at a telephone hearing

6.	How long do you think the hearing will last?	2	Hours		Minutes
	Is this time estimate agreed by all parties?	Yes	No

7.

Give details of any fixed trial date or period

None

8.

What level of Judge does your hearing need?

District Judge

9.

Who should be served with this application?

Dolmans solicitors on behalf of the Chief Constable of South Wales Police

9a.

Please give the service address, (other than details of the claimant or defendant) of any party named in question 9.

10.  What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?

 the attached witness statement

 the statement of case

3  the evidence set out in the box below

The defendant to disclose 422 witnesses:   Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of Operation OrchidAll records re police helicopter flights re Operations Chalice and OrchidAll Vale of Glamorgan and Cardiff records of Operation ‘Orchid’ & ‘Chalice’  Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of Operation ChaliceGold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of Operation BridgerAll minutes relating to Gold Groups are retained locally by that ‘OCU’.     (These documents must include closure reports, Gold Group logs and other       material such as Critical Incident Management Logs). Nottingham police records relating to Operation Chalice and exhibit ARH1Scott Arms records relating to Operation Chalice and exhibit ARH1Duxford Museum records relating to ARH1Bedford Shuttleworth Air Museum records relating to Operation Chalice (five machineguns)Chepstow Forensic Scientific Services records relating to Operation Chalice and ARH1RAF records (2000 Farnborough Airshow and Lynham airfields) of exhibit ARH1Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of ‘Foxy’Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of PC Nigel BrownFull content of all police and retired police personal pocket notebooks of Operation ChaliceFull content of HMP Cardiff & G4S run HMP Parc records of Operation Chalice & OrchidFull content of HMP Parc stolen Caswell Clinic medical records of claimant re Operation Chalice and civil claim 1CF03361Andrew Huxtable Prosecution exhibits AH1 &AH2Andrew Huxtable’s Home Office controlled video and photographs of his examination of ex ARH 1Litts of Newport gun shop, South Wales, records relating to Operation Chalice and ARH1Medica lrecords of bridget Craddockre Operation chalice and OrchidMedical records of Dr Metters re Operations Chalice & Orchid     The Cardiff Count Court to issue witness summonses, to the following, to attend 1CF93361 civil damages claim on behalf of the claimant:   Tim Dodson, clerk of court, with the claimant’s defense statement for T20097445 and court logKirstie Kirk with records of her Operations Chalice and Orchid involvementGenevieve Kirk with records of her Operations Chalice and Orchid involvement‘Foxy’, under cover police officer, with his records of Operations Chalice and OrchidNigel Brown of South Wales Police with his records of operation Chalice and OrchidRetired DC James Philips with his records of Operations Chalice and OrchidRetired inspector Phil Davies with his records of Operations Chalice and OrchidPolice officer Kerslake with his records of Operations Chalice, Orchid & BS612159 damages claimPolice officer Redrupp with his records of Operations Chalice and Orchid & BS612159 damages clPolice officer Williams with his records of Operations Chalice Orchid & BS612159 damages claimPolice officer Andrew Rice with records of Operations Chalice Orchid & BS612159 damages claimPolice Officer Davidson with his records of Operations Chalice/Orchid & BS612159 damages claimPolice Officer Morgan with his records of Operations Chalice/Orchid & BS612159 damages claimPolice Officer Dyson with his records of Operations Chalice/Orchid & BS612159 damages claim Appropriate Adult Mr Reeves who witnessed Operation Chalice and Orchid helicopter raidRetired Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie OIC of Operations Chalice and Orchid   This list is far from exhaustive

Statement of Truth

I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

3   I believe that the facts stated in section 10 (and any continuation sheets) are true.

The Applicant believes that the facts stated in section 10 (and any continuation sheets) are true. I am authorised by the applicant to sign this statement.

Signature

3 _  Applicant

_ Litigation friend (where applicant is a child or a Protected Party)

Applicant’s legal representative (as defined by CPR 2.3(1))

Date

Day		Month		Year
12th		September		2021

Full name

Maurice John Kirk

Name of applicant’s legal representative’s firm

If signing on behalf of firm or company give position or office held

Applicant’s address to which documents should be sent.

Building and street

Second line of address

Town or city

Taunton

County (optional)

Somerset

Postcode

T	A	1	4	E	Y

If applicable

Phone number

077708586202

Fax number

N/A

DX number

N/A

Your Ref.

1CF03361

Email

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Maurice Kirk offers £100 plus, in cash, for information from witnesses with reference to his illegal two years incarcerated in Welsh prisons, Cardiff, Parc and Swansea relating to any of his facts published in his £500,000 Particulars of Damages Claim against G4S & South Wales Police

Please ring 07708586202 or email maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Q

DRAFT                                                                                              Case number G00TA220

Bristol County Court

Maurice J Kirk

and

G4S Care & Justice Services (UK) Limited (HMP Parc)

Draft Statement 25 March version by Maurice John Kirk BVSc

For requesting Disclosure of around my stay at HMP Parc

A request for copies of the obvious paper trail that the Defendant expects me to have in my possession

1. The typical standard administration of all prisons in the UK involves that a prisoner must communicate with the prison staff in writing by a written Application or Complaint using only a standard form. The prison staff replies are also in writing.

• Applications can be a request for example for his shoes where many simple requests are in writing on the standard Applications Form. Any complaint minor or serious must be in writing on a Comp 1 Form or Comp 2 if confidential. All replies to written applications and or Cmp1 and Comp2 forms in writing are replied in writing/ A confidential complaint is on a Form Comp 1A. There is therefore always a paper trail.

• If the prisoner is not content with the replies for an Application or Complaint there is an escalation process again by all recorded in writing. The escalation process has a number of stages each with the prisoner submitting written forms with written replies.

• All prisons keep copies of all records indefinitely

• My copies of my prison paper trail were confiscated while in both HMP Cardiff (see leaked prison officer Daryl Davies witness statement) and in HMP Parc (see witness statements of G4S prison officers) to try to prevent me having my records of events to bring this case. On my 1^st November 2019 release none of my papers from either prison were returned to me until august 2021 but some of my prison letters, addressed to me or addressed by me, were returned to me while recovering in a waiting car directly outside of the prison main gates.

• The Defendant claims to have returned my copies. I say they have not. Regardless it is not unreasonable that I now be given copies from prison files of all written exchanges that I sent into staff while a prisoner at HMP Parc and any replies from the prison staff to me.  

• Several times prison staff, in both prisons, stated that the South Wales Police had entered my prison cells, sometimes with search dogs and took away my written documents. This matter was raised before the T20200177 Exeter Crown Court trial judge, His Honour Judge Johnson, HM Crown Prosecutor, solicitor Mr Nick Evans and CPS barrister during my many requests for my papers back and especially recordings of my communications with various MPs before the obvious acquittal.

• These papers will give a structure to events and facts that are needed to draft a Particulars of Claim and a structure that the Court needs to see by 30^th March 2022.

Similar Request to a Subject Access Request

• All prisons keep careful records on all prisoners’ daily progress for various reasons including to justify any responses or interference in rights. I was already marked down for ‘special treatment as a MAPPA level 3 serious danger to the Chief Constable. My record included ‘extremely violent and likely to try and escape’!

1. I wish copies of all records where control is exercised over me either by an action or inaction

1. We are well aware that the power of the state can lawfully interfere with rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 if there is justification or good reason.

1. All of a very full approach to this information is needed to avoid wasting the time of the Court because we must avoid the potential of me claiming a very long list of interferences when with my poor health I am simply not remembering when there may have been a reason for staff to interfere.

A broadest approach compared to a Subject Access request 

1. The case is based in my being in dispute with other agencies who exaggerate or invent ‘risk’ even to spectacular levels to try to cause me harm and loss.

1. I was not only declared MAPPA level 3 category 3 but even a Whitehall FTAC ‘Critical Public Protection Risk’. This means I am supposed to be one of the very most dangerous people of all in the UK. But not only is it obvious for reasons of common sense that that is untrue it is difficult for the various authorities, reliant on South Wales Police CRO false records, to be consistent with such an invention.        

1. The Court needs to know the consistency with which HMP Parc staff viewed me and whether HMP Parc staff even further exaggerated any of these very many aspects of the defamatory attacks and how that may have caused bullying by staff and prisoners .
2. Or did the G4S HMP Parc reject what other authorities said and make up their own approach? So was that approach fair or an explanation of how bullying arose? 

Obvious mischief by the Defendant to justify Disclosure

1.   A prison makes a record of a MAPPA prisoner’s correspondence, sent or received  even admitting the Claimant had a volume of papers but during the Exeter MP trial the jury were denied those prison letter records, the primary cause of my acquittal.

1. The evidence before the Court is that the Defendant said in their main defence reply .

1. Point 17 e “He was carried to a car. He left with his property.” CCTV alone will confirm the blatant lie.

• a level playing field ?

to be continued 

all predicted 20 years ago

In 2019 I was robbed by G4S Parc prison staff of my ‘machine gun’ legal papers and vital daily medicines while South Wales Police continued to have my letters to lawyers and MPs blocked both in and out of gaol.

South Wales Police and prison continue to refuse to answer my letters of request for return of my legal papers, clothes, wheelchair and statutory cell inventory drawn up after I was dragged from cell in handcuffs behind my back

HMP Parc also ignores my MP’s and barrister’s letters both requesting return of my stolen property.

An interesting twist in all this behaviour is that neither my Party HQ, I visited in London, nor Speaker of the House will allocate to me an alternative MP to help me in the recovery of the property as my own is too bone idle from living off immoral earnings and on a sick ‘agenda’ based on proven fraud.

Instead of just returning any of my property , listed above, I have been served a bill for £50,000 odd preliminary legal costs in defence of my G00TA220 half million pound damages civil claim

Some suggest, with the return of my £10,000 court fee and a G4S plausible written response as to why G4S is being denied the right, by the south wales Police, to return the prisoner’s property then, perhaps, we can all go home?

But no it is all part of another example of lawyer’s protected runaway ‘gravy train’

DRAFT (12th February 2022)

Maurice Kirk v G4S                                                                          case no G00TA220

Claimant’s Position Statement

I patiently served on Parc prison management,  during 2019, almost daily complaints on issued Comp1 & Comp2 forms highlighting the serious irregularities that needed positive response but this escalated to my being robbed by G4S staff on 1st November 2019 of my vital legal and medical papers in my cell, including 1CF03361 ‘machine gun’ civil claim arising from some 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions,  no doubt at the behest of the South Wales Police the Defendant in the torts.

1. In December 2017 Judge Tracy Lloyd Clark handed down a vindictive politically motivated 2-year prison sentence leaving my van outside at Cardiff Crown Court full of other legal papers to be ransacked. In December 2018 I was paroled to Mandeville House, Lewis St, Bail Hostel Cardiff.

2.     On Thursday 21 February 2019 at around 8.30pm I was taken from my bath at the bail Hostel back to custody, probably at a police station

3.     On Friday 22 February 2019 I was returned to prison but to HMP Cardiff where a court heard the Cardiff prison service, whilst I was locked in the shower for 32 minutes, also had entered my cell and stole my medical, legal and private papers, never to be returned, on the pretext I had posted to an idle MP anthrax spores sufficient to wipe out a village the same size as, for example, Stoke St Mary Taunton Somerset!

4.     On Monday 25 February 2019 was the deadline for 1CF03361 Keyser/’Lewis gun’ hearing.  Further Particulars and evidence were submitted to court in my absence. But communications from Cardiff Civil Court/HHJ Keyser ‘Lewis’ case continued to be sent to the Bail Hostel – meaning my letters from HMP Parc were not getting to Cardiff Civil Justice centre. HMP Parc and HMP Cardiff prevented my communications to the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre therefore had a profound adverse effect on my ability to conduct very major litigation.    

5.     Between March 2019 and 1 November 2019 I was seriously bullied and abused which included

a)     Urine and faeces thrown into my cell

b)     Physical violence from staff

c)     Staff encouraging prisoners to be hostile and bully

d)     Bullying and abuse included interference with and delay of mail to Cardiff Civil Justice Centre and Royal Courts of Justice to pursue my case

e)     The bullying and abuse included confiscating property which still has not been returned.

f) For weeks on end I was deprived of my medicines for life in both HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc. Frantic bartering with other prisoners was needed,

7.     On 31 October 2019 without my knowledge my sister magistrate was told by G4S at HMP Parc that I would be released the next day and so frantically arranged a car to collect me from the prison gates in Bridgend at an inexact time around an early breakfast time.

8.     On 1 November 2019 I was violently carried, much at head height, from my cell and placed in the car without my cell possessions and immediately driven out of Wales by a needlessly manufactured deadline of having to rush with haste to meet a Probation Officer in Taunton or I would be being returned to prison

9.     Following my release form HMP Parc on 1 November 2019 as a favour the Probation Officer in Wales Bradley Hughes attempted to regain my property for me. Where Brad Hughes was able to recover my property from the bail hostel with ease. G4S at HMP Parc were obstructive.

10.     At the end of May 2020 I had sent a text to Parole Officer, Brad Hughes, saying :-

“Hello Brad. Thank you for arranging I get my possessions from the Lewis St Bail Hostel, which I have now received. Unfortunately, G4S & HMP Parc have still not given me my possession and papers from when I was released 1 November 2019. I can’t get any response from them. Although you have tried in the past please would you be willing to ask them if I can have my possessions and papers or what I should do next? Thanks Maurice.”

11.  G4S/HMP Parc would not respond to Brad Hughes, my Devon MP or me.

12.  After I served my G00TA220 damages on G4S only some property was returned by August 2021

13.  Importantly G4S are keeping my legal papers that includes evidence of my being bullied and abused at HMP Parc by G4S.

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

                        Tel 07708586202

FINAL DRAFT

14 February 2022

Bristol County Court

Bristol

BLM solicitors,

2 New Bailey Square,

Stanley Street,

Salford M3 5GS

Tel 0161 236 2002

Your ref: MPI/ /150 183.540/ XC

Dear Sirs,

Re: Claim G00TA220 regards G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Limited (HMP Parc)

Position Statement February 2022 Requesting the Defendant reply within 7 days

so that I can respond on issues below to the Court

Between December 2018 and Thursday 21 February 2019 I was on Licence from HMP Parc and placed at a Cardiff City Centre Bail Hostel. On 21 February 2019 I was taken into custody and the Defendants say I was returned to HMP Parc under the control of G4S as from 28 June 2019 and until 1 November 2019.

Regards 21 February 2019 to 27 June 2019 I was at HMP Cardiff and I now have a copy of a statement dated 9 April 2021 by HMP Cardiff Officer Darrell Davies to say that on 19 May 2019 he was a part of a search team that confiscated a large quantity of my papers from my prison cell. HMP Cardiff Prison Officer Darrel Davies says that the content of the statement he makes in 2021 is from his original notes. To imply Prison Officers make notes and records of actions and confiscating property and papers, and those records and notes made by Prison Officers are kept indefinitely.      

This claim against G4S at HMP Parc is regarding the bullying and mistreatment I received at the hands of G4S which includes G4S confiscating legal papers and possessions where my wheelchair and legal papers have still not been returned.

The G4S/HMP Parc Defence document says Point 17 e.

“It Is admitted that on the 1 November 2019, the day the Claimant was released, ………

He left with his property. ……”.

In total contrast in the letter to the Claimant from the Defendant 30 December 2021

“… we have confirmed to you that

your property was returned to you on 27 August 2021”

Yet I have still not received my wheelchair or importantly the legal papers that were confiscated as a way to prevent me having the factual record and evidence to bring this claim against G4S/HMP Parc.  

I ask the Defendant to reply within 7 calendar days regards these following issues which I aim to raise with the Court:-

1. I believe G4S confiscated my legal papers and did not return them as a way to try to make it difficult for me to bring a case against them. Because I have lost my logs, records and copies of communications that show the bullying by G4S to have occurred. Will the Defendant now return my papers? Or do I need to make a formal application to Order G4S to return those papers immediately?

• If I make an application, does the Court also have the power to Order early release of all of the G4S HMP Parc prison logs, records and communications from when I was in custody with the Defendant. Or will the Defendant agree to Disclose now?   If I gain the copies of my legal papers and also copies of the HMP Parc logs, records and communications then we will all see a factual structure and how obvious this claim is and I will know how to word amendments to the claim.

• Additionally will the Defendant supply (or if not can the Court Order) that the Defendant list what logs, records and communications are normally kept on a prisoner like me and so to serve as a guide as to whether G4S HMP Parc staff may be hiding evidence to try to undermine the claim

• As a case management issue unless the Defendant returns my papers and discloses prison logs records and communications at this early stage I will later need to apply to amend statements and pleadings in ways that will be involved and time consuming that unnecessarily increases costs.   

Relevant to saving the cost of a trial, if the Defendant return my legal papers and the prison records that gives a factual structure of what has happened we then have the option to explore the potential of a pre trial out of court settlement

Also regards the Defendant’s cost schedule, I do not agree what the Defendant says because if I am given my legal papers and prison records this matter can be far more simple if not very simple indeed

As we are aware as a Litigant in Person I did not need to list my costs as do the Defendant  but what I ask for here helps the Court and case management in a similar way .

Please would the Defendant reply to these points within 7 calendar days for me to make a response to the Court to assist case management.

Thank you

Yours 

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

To be continued

The G4S Lawyer’s bill, to date, received yesterday.

That should cover G4S/SWP legal bill nicely (cottage in the centre of picture under my wing tip)

Snip of the year D-Day Patten cub £30,000

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/extinction-rebellion-activists-cleared-over-london-rush-hour-disruption/ar-AASMtMl?ocid=msedgntp

FAO G4S Lawyers re my Brutal Robbery by G4S HMP Parc Staff

Once again the Welsh authorities ignore recent rules of law such as this

file:///C:/Users/mauri/OneDrive/Desktop/A%20general%20introduction%20to%20e-discovery%20

Tel 07708586202 

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

15 January 2022

BLM solicitors,

2 New Bailey Square,

Stanley Street,

Salford M3 5GS

Tel 0161 236 2002

Dear Sirs,

Re: Claim G00TA220 regards G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Limited (HMP Parc)

Your letter of 31 December 2021 totally avoids the issues. Also, please would you also respond by email, as I often do not get hard copy mail that is posted.

Firstly, for us to make a start please could you provide copies of obvious evidence such as the involved and detailed files which include the pages of complaints written by me (eg Comp1/2 forms), prison responses, documents and prison logs during my stay at HMP Parc.  

Secondly here is a brief overview to help you sending any other letters which are relevant but totally avoid important issues.

1.     In December 2017 Judge Tracy Lloyd Clark, sitting at Cardiff Crown Court handed down a vindictive 2-year prison sentence for my publishing a video recording of my commentary of my attendance, to register complaint at a police station on the internet, being an alleged breach of a Restraining Order. She had not allowed the jury or herself to grasp how I was publishing the simple truth with reference to the doctor’s quite unqualified and seriously erroneous 19^th October 2009 medical report that I had such a level of irreversible ‘brain damage, that I was to be further registered MAPPA level 3/3 (top 5%most dangerous in the UK) and incarcerated in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric prison for life.

2.     But the underlying issues to help understand why the claim regards G4S conduct is so very serious is that neither the jury or Judge Tracey Lloyd Clarke had considered what difference saying the truth regards professional standards of senior NHS staff and Police (that liaise and work together including as members of SW Police Gold, Silver and Bronze groups) that protects the public could make to whether what I did amounts to harassment or if my actions did what lesser sentence may be appropriate eg freedom of speech.

3.     While I needed to appeal my conviction and sentence and expose the horrific corruption of how SW Police’s Gold Silver and Bronze group collude with errant NHS staff, G4S and HMP Cardiff were holding my post from being sent and received including my letters to and from courts that included the Criminal Court of Appeal.

The potential harm and loss may be enormous    

4.      By Dec 2018 I was paroled to Mandeville House, Lewis St, Bail Hostel Cardiff.

5.     On Thursday 21 February 2019 at around 8.30pm I was taken from my bath at the bail Hostel back to custody, probably to a police station for the first night.

6.     On Friday 22 February 2019 I was returned to prison but to HMP Cardiff.

7.     Monday 25 February 2019 was the deadline for 1CF03361 Keyser/’Lewis gun’ hearing requiring Further Particulars and limited evidence was submitted to court in my absence. But communications from Cardiff Civil Court/HHJ Keyser ‘Lewis’ case continued to be sent to the Bail Hostel – meaning my letters from HMP Parc were not getting to Cardiff Civil Justice centre. HMP Parc and HMP Cardiff prevented my communications to the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre therefore had a profound adverse effect on my ability to conduct very major litigation.

8.     Between March 2019 and 1 November 2019 I was seriously bullied and abused which included need for medical attention at Accident and Emergency in hospital.

a)     Urine and faeces thrown into my cell and on my bed.

b)     Physical violence from staff

c)     Staff encouraging prisoners to be hostile and bully

d)     The bullying and abuse included interference with and delaying mail to RCJ and Cardiff Civil Justice Centre to pursue my civil cases

e)     The bullying and abuse included confiscating vital property which still has not been returned. (This includes a wheelchair, legal papers, clothes and shoes).

f) For weeks on end I was deprived of my medicines, some prescribed for life, in both HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc.

9.     On 31 October 2019 without my knowledge my sister was told by G4S at HMP Parc that I would be released the next day and she arranged a car to collect me from the prison gates at an exact time which was roughly around an early breakfast time.

10.  On 1 November 2019 I was carried from my cell and placed in the car without my possessions and immediately driven out of Wales by a needlessly manufactured deadline of having to rush with haste to meet a Probation Officer in Taunton or risk being returned to prison. I had to attend the Bristol Royal Infirmary.

11.  At the end of May 2020 I had sent a text to Parole Officer, Brad Hughes, saying :-

“Hello Brad. Thank you for arranging I get my possessions from the Lewis St Bail Hostel, which I have now received. Unfortunately, G4S & HMP Parc have still not given me my possession and papers from when I was released 1 November 2019. I can’t get any response from them. Although you have tried in the past please would you be willing to ask them if I can have my possessions and papers or what I should do next? Thanks Maurice.”

12.   Following my release form HMP Parc on 1 November 2019 as a favour the Probation Officer in Wales Bradley Hughes attempted to regain my property for me. Where Brad Hughes was able to recover my property from the bail hostel with ease. G4S at HMP Parc were obstructive and refused.

13.   G4S/HMP Parc would not respond to Mr Hughes, my Devon or Taunton MP.

14.  After I had served my G00TA220 damages claim on G4S only some of my property was returned in August 2021

15.  Importantly, G4S are keeping my legal papers and letters of complaint that includes evidence of my being bullied and abused at HMP Parc by G4S having circulated to both staff and prisoners that I had convictions for firearms, child abuse and narcotics all of which was false.

Yours

Maurice Kirk BVSc

Well done, Australia for upholding ‘the rule of law’

Both acquitted Bristol Colston statue criminals and London’s train vandals, despite blocking our roads and railways, is a reminder of much more serious things to come

So, is all these irregular acquittals coinciding with the new legislation planned to further restrict our basic rights to protest?

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

RED BOX | EDWARD HENRY

Think twice before criticising the Colston verdict

Edward HenryFriday January 07 2022, 12.01am, The Times

Juries have the power to put justice before the law, a power they have exercised for hundreds of years. Authoritarian governments have always hated them for this, and the acquittals of the Colston four have, predictably, precipitated an avalanche of adverse comment.

Much of the parliamentary blasting of the verdict involves dire predictions from Conservative MPs that our heritage, far and wide, has been put at risk by this dangerous precedent. From the tenor of outrage directed at the jurors’ decision one might even imagine that resurrecting the star chamber is a distinct possibility, in preference to that awkward squad of twelve credulous individuals, the jury.

SPONSORED

The Leader of The House, Jacob Rees-Mogg, not known for his modernity, must have delighted his legions of friends

The days of the UK jury system is sadly drawing to a close.

I was at the release of some ill informed vandals in Bristol Crown Court, this week, charged with an uncomplicated act of premeditated ‘criminal damage’ contrary to the 1972 Act. They had pulled down Edward Colston’s statue, a symbol of naughtiness like Hitler, that needs to be never forgotten.

Which leads my comment, into rebuttal from today’s anon comment, straight into the state of our democracy at MP level…….

EXTRACT FROM MY LETTER TO HM CROWN COURT

I enclose supporting documents for long awaited matters to be resolved by the appropriate court, yours or the RCJ

1, My costs incurred relating to a bone idle MP who still refuses to respond to any of my emails, despite court intervention, concerning a robbery for my legal papers by G4S on behalf  of the South Wales Police.
2,. My costs incurred by the South Wales Police falsifying data about me to the Devon and Cornwall police to cause arrest and car confiscation over a knife.
3.My application to have my Restraining Order varied/quashed re T20200177 re MP

a) CPS admit only two of my letters reached the MP a year apart and the first was sent by Cardiff prison not by me

b) My two visits to the area Conservative Party, as a member and speaking to one member of staff only, were about 2/3 months apart when my message was not correctly passed onto the MP.

c) Now, it appears, the Speaker of the House also refuses to allocate to me with an alternative MP to address my grievance of the theft. 

In law, I humbly suggest, none of that described above is contrary to the 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act even with the wildest of imagination!
thankyou–

Maurice J Kirk BVSc  

I was told I could only communicate with an MP by email and no other way!

The idle MP not only has ignored my complaint by email, of being robbed by G4S personnel at HMP Parc to steel my legal papers against the South Wales Police over their 120 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions but the MP has put it about that the statutory procedure for my being designated another MP has been blocked by the PM, The Speaker of the House to even my own Conservative Party HQ!

So any of you out there thinking the appalling Bristol Crown Court verdict is just another ‘drop in a tea cup’ wise up, wake up, our basic rights for freedom of speech, for example, is just one more step to abolition for the New World Order dominated by freemason devil worship.

Having witnessed and the victim of so many so called unbiased juries in my day, in Guernsey, England and Wales, I can assure the general public they so often get the verdict wrong. They get it wrong due to lack of understanding of either the facts in the case or now taken in by the rampant innuendo when the prosecution ‘play ‘ the politics card.

This Bristol incident again reminds me of Cardiff Courts, in 2009, when I had won 89 % of some 126 South Wales Police criminal allegations, fictitious, fabricated or otherwise, in order to have my name removed from the veterinary register. I needed to fight as no one obtains justice any more in a perverse British court system without a huge amount of cash to pay the completely fabricated legal bills as nothing is properly ‘taxed’ at source any more by our self serving antiquated British legal system that should be abolished along with the wickedly designed National Health system also promoting uncontrollable deceit.

The ‘Gulag card’, therefore, was dealt to me by the Welsh authorities by blackmailing the sacked and now ‘deported’ to New Zealand’ Caswell Clinic forensic psychiatrist, Dr T W, to falsify my medical report, anything to block my imminent jury trial for alleged ‘trading in machine guns’ I was bound to win.

The doctor in my forced absence, locked in a cell under the court without even a lawyer or my legal papers (except those shoved up my arse), had told the 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court I was ‘not fit’ to stand and defend my trial due to ‘irreversible brain damage’ and registered MAPPA level 3, one of the 5% most dangerous roaming our streets. He was not even medically qualified to write his 19th November 2009 medical report to support his application asking I be sectioned to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital for life.

With the advent of the ever damaging social media and breakdown of of the family unit, during the informative years for children being at the height of their thirst for knowledge, the future remains grim.

All we have left is the three sitting lay magistrates. at summary level, to restore some sanity to our community but when did you last see all three sitting there?

In my life time I have watched the English standards in our law courts , once much referred and exported around the world, slowly being eroded to what I just witnessed in Bristol Crown Court. The re-action by the misinformed present in the street, deliberately blocking the traffic due to the police present ordered not to intervene, was quite disgusting spectacle to watch.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/woman-who-toppled-colston-statue-slams-tory-war-on-woke/ar-AASAGZl?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531

white lives matter

RED BOX | EDWARD HENRY

Think twice before criticising the Colston verdict

Edward Henry Friday January 07 2022, 12.01am, The Times

Juries have the power to put justice before the law, a power they have exercised for hundreds of years. Authoritarian governments have always hated them for this, and the acquittals of the Colston four have, predictably, precipitated an avalanche of adverse comment.

Much of the parliamentary blasting of the verdict involves dire predictions from Conservative MPs that our heritage, far and wide, has been put at risk by this dangerous precedent. From the tenor of outrage directed at the jurors’ decision one might even imagine that resurrecting the star chamber is a distinct possibility, in preference to that awkward squad of twelve credulous individuals, the jury.

SPONSORED

The Leader of The House, Jacob Rees-Mogg, not known for his modernity, must have delighted his legions of friends

OF COURSE THIS CASE SHOULD BE NOW REFERRED TO AN UNBIASED COURT OF LAW

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10377203/Colston-statue-trial-judge-worried-pressure-jury.html

At Bristol Crown Court today, while waiting for a barrister in my million-pound ‘trading in machine guns’ South Wales Police conspiracy case, I unfortunately found myself entangled with a bunch of vandals who had just been acquitted for the criminal damage to the Edward Colston’s statue.

The monument, in the city centre, had been pulled down by ropes and huge cheers from a mob and successfully dragged to the edge of the jetty only to be unceremoniously tipped into the harbour.

Their followers, some fifty-odd accompanied by photographers from the national press, had blocked the street outside the Bristol court which put an immediate shiver down my spine. The realisation of things to come in England if our government did not take a firm hand and restore some semblance of sanity then our future was grim. I decided to linger and listen in to their banter.

Instead of leaving, before I was going to vomit, I attempted to reason with one or two of whose using temperate language bordering on comprehension, ie some with an honest opinion. ‘Freedom of speech was fine by myself but I failed, miserably, to persuade any one of them to ‘see reason’ that this was already an admitted criminal damage incident and therefore a criminal offence.

So, I was subjected to fifteen minutes or so of utter ignorance shouted out, in turn, by the urchins clearly signifying their complete misunderstanding of either the ‘rule of law’ or respect for other people’s property, however contentious the subject. No one I spoke to was in a frame of mind of tendering some rational explanation in rebuttal as they had already been given the ‘green light’.

The ‘green light’, today, was the beacon this protest continued to follow lit by the Bristol authorities at the time of the toppling of the Edward Colston statue months earlier. I understand the police had simply stood by on that occasion and done nothing as the fear for the widespread damage potential, with the then fired up mob hell bent on smashing shop windows and burn out cars, far outweighed an incident so short lived as the statue into the Bristol docks.

But, as I soon found out, the ‘green light’ still burned as the traffic jammed outside the court, including the prison van that the vandals had narrowly escaped from, remained stationary. My remonstrations to two police personnel to clear the street, standing idly by, achieved nothing.

A further warning to me, originally given by that school boy hero of mine, of WW1 Military Cross fame while also known for his accurate predictions as an MP decades ahead of his time.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/police/

Judicial corruption: Many UK judges are acting fraudulently

Costs Review 7th Jan 22 at 14.40 hrs at Exeter Crown Court reT20210178/T20200177 Acquittals 

AND NOW THIS NEXT FRIDAY’S BLOODY NONSENSE OF A COMPELLED TO BE ‘LITIGANT in PERSON’ TO BE DENIED AGAIN, OUT OF POCKET EXPENSES, TO BE HEARD IN EXETER CROWN COURT WITH HM RECORDER OF EXTER, OVER THE DELIBERATE PERVERSION OF JUSTICE, AT THE BEHEST OF SOUITH WALES POLICE, BY CPS AGREEING WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF PC Svenlick’s body cam catching him violently assaulting me, for no good reason, on the side of M5 motorway while showing off to to two female police officers.

A THOROUGHLY DECEITFUL UK JUDICIARY HELL BENT ON PROTECTING THE ‘lawyer/CPS/police money making cartels, the the tax payer’s ‘gravy train’ flowing to the criminals with no accountability to any one for their daily deceit.

A lying bone idle little MP was the cause but none of you appear to have the back bone to stop it

STOP PRESS

Insert name

Address line 1

Address line 2

City

Postcode

By email & first class post:

(Delete and insert appropriately)  MP name here

MP constituency office address line 1

Address line 2

City

Postcode

Dear (Insert MP name),

 [Maurice is denied by Exeter Crown Court Order but he will pay you handsomely if you obtain an appropriate reply]                                                                                                              

I read the recent article on the Intelligenceuk.com website exposing judges breaking their oaths and abusing our people in the name of law and justice.   The article titled; “Many of the UK’s judges are a fraud in their own right” (search for the article in their website).   

The article opened my eyes to the fact that the judiciary are unregulated and that nobody is enforcing the law against them, they self-regulate and all stick together to protect one another.  

All MPs also took oath when swearing into Parliamentary Office to act “according to law”, with a duty to act in the national public interest, whilst lending a voice in Parliament to your constituents.

The Promissory Oaths Act 1868 is law today, designed to protect British civilians from tyranny by those in positions of trust.   Judges that breach their oaths by acting with favour and ill-will pose a significant risk of harm to all they encounter.   The problem is that judges that breach their oaths are remaining in office to do it time and time again.  The law was not designed to work that way.   We need to rein in corrupt members of our judiciary and you have the power to do it.

Section 11(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 provides that power:

“A person appointed to an office to which this section applies shall hold that office during good behaviour, subject to a power of removal by Her Majesty on an address presented to Her by both Houses of Parliament”.

I request that you make representations on my behalf in Parliament to ensure that the judiciary is investigated and that judges that are found to have breached their oaths are expelled immediately from our judiciary.    

Thank you very much and I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely,

First & last name

Dear Sir,

BUT my outstanding £7000 odd ‘out of pocket’ expenses caused by a lying bone idle MP, living off immoral earnings,  refusing even to answer my plea for help from the vicious G4S robbery in Parc Prison, purely set up by the South Wales Police to ‘screw’ my 1CF03361 ‘trading in machine guns’ acquittal civil claim, also needs ‘review’ as the paltry compensation, so far granted, is derisory.

My ‘appeal bundle’, currently needing re-drafting for The Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, requires your input, please. ( temporary Appeal bundle draft at the bottom of this blog).

Deceitful and evil senior South Wales police officers knew, a year before I was gaoled for ‘gun running’, that the film prop imitation WW1 Lewis machine gun on my Farnborough Air show DH2 biplane was never a ‘prohibited weapon’ but a single shot garden gun for rats and tree rats with a blocked barrel!

The police’s unblocking of the barrel and changing the colour of its paintwork fooled no juror either.

The following 2010 certificate, alone, confirms the replica ‘gun’ never was a ‘gun’ in the first place!

There is a very real risk of his appeal being rejected even before Their Lordships have even had the chance of reading the litany of deliberate police lies within it to cover up the earlier Cardiff court ‘whitewash’ of his 2013 civil claim for damages, BS614159, covering over 40 similar malicious failed criminal prosecutions by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding and her predecessors, for the South Wales Police.

His Honour Judge Petts QC was told in open court, in September’s Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, that Maurice now has a two million pound (concocted) legal bill for also losing his 1CF03361 ‘trading in machine guns’ T20097445 acquittal claim for yet another failed South Wales Police malicious criminal prosecution involving his eight months in gaol on remand.

So desperate was the welsh conspiracy was in by then now Maurice was denied his legal papers and medicine, during each day of the trial from his Cardiff prison cell, he had to survive on that paper work he could cram in his rectum twice a day.

That farcical T2009445 Crown Court jury trial, incidentally, required neither Defendant legal representation nor defence evidence. Not even a compulsory ‘defence statement’ was scribbled out in his cell, in solitary confinement, for eight of the jury to laugh over in the nearest pub having physically dragged him into as he came down the court steps with some of his family!

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/19588243.maurice-kirk-not-guilty-possession-knife-public

Not surprising after filing this  application before the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

htt

htt

https://yout

Qqube.com/watch?v=kBi0UNp18ys

⁴

Machine Gun Trial Judgment

The conspiracy is in the tape of the farcical Cardiff court trial if you are interested in a copy?

In the Bristol County Court                                           

Case number GA00TA220

Maurice John Kirk (Applicant)

v

G4S Custodial Services Ltd (Respondent)

DRAFT

Revised Skeleton Argument

for the hearing of 2^nd December 2021

Background

( Did you get that, Tim K?)

Swiftly followed by the learned judge refusing my N244 Application for CPR disclosure in its entirety

Swiftly followed by the learned judge and Police QC expressing a view that on my acquittal a Newport gun shop ‘must’ have decommissioned the ‘prohibited weapon’ before sending prosecution exhibit ARH1 (replica machine gun) to Birmingham Proof House!

Swiftly avoiding the mysterious three day disappearance, it would appear, of the item when police withheld evidence will confirm it went to the Chepstow forensic laboratory where the barrel was likely to have been unblocked and prosecution exhibit painted a different colour in the hope of fooling a jury.

Failed South Wales Police Disclosure of evidence forced me to pay for a 12th Sept 2021 court application to disclose the the key evidence proving malicious criminal prosecutions by senior Welsh police officers over a 13 year period.

N244 Application notice

For help in completing this form please read the notes for guidance form N244Notes. Find out how HM Courts and Tribunals Service uses personal information you give them when you fill in a form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-cou rts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information[1]charter

Name of court County Court at Cardiff Claim no. CF03361 Fee account no. (if applicable) Help with Fees – Ref. no. (if applicable) H W F – – Warrant no. (if applicable) Claimant’s name (including ref.) Maurice John Kirk Defendant’s name (including ref.) Chief Constable of South Wales Police

Date12th Sept 2021 sept2021

1. What is your name or, if you are a legal representative, the name of your firm? Maurice John Kirk

2. Are you a Claimant Defendant Legal Representative Other (please specify) Applicant. If you are a legal representative whom do you represent?

3. What order are you asking the court to make and why? An Order for Specific Disclosure of documents as set out under CPR 32.12.and for the issuing of witness summonses.

4 Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for? ✓ Yes No

5. How do you want to have this application dealt with? ✓ at a hearing without a hearing at a telephone hearing

6. How long do you think the hearing will last? 2 Hours Minutes Is this time estimate agreed by all parties? Yes No

7. Give details of any fixed trial date or period None

8. What level of Judge does your hearing need? District Judge

9. Who should be served with this application? Dolmans solicitors on behalf of the Chief Constable of South Wales Police 9a. Please give the service address, (other than details of the claimant or defendant) of any party named in question 9. 2

10. What information will you be relying on, in support of your application? the attached witness statement the statement of case ✓ the evidence set out in the box below

The defendant to disclose: 1. Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of Operation Orchid

2. All records re police helicopter flights re Operations Chalice and Orchid

3. All Vale of Glamorgan and Cardiff records of Operation ‘Orchid’ & ‘Chalice’

4. Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of Operation Chalice

5. Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of Operation Bridger

6. All minutes relating to Gold Groups are retained locally by that ‘OCU’. (These documents must include closure reports, Gold Group logs and other material such as Critical Incident Management Logs).

7. Nottingham police records relating to Operation Chalice and exhibit ARH1

8. Scott Arms records relating to Operation Chalice and exhibit ARH1

9. Duxford Museum records relating to ARH1

10. Bedford Shuttleworth Air Museum records relating to Operation Chalice (five machineguns)

11. Chepstow Forensic Scientific Services records relating to Operation Chalice and ARH1

12. RAF records (2000 Farnborough Airshow and Lynham airfields) of exhibit ARH1

13. Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of ‘Foxy’

14. Gold, Silver, Bronze, MAPPA, OASys, MG6D and PII records of PC Nigel Brown

15. Full content of all police and retired police personal pocket notebooks of Operation Chalice

16. Full content of HMP Cardiff & G4S run HMP Parc records of Operation Chalice & Orchid

17. Full content of HMP Parc stolen Caswell Clinic medical records of claimant re Operation Chalice and civil claim 1CF03361

18. Andrew Huxtable Prosecution exhibits AH1 &AH2

19. Andrew Huxtable’s Home Office controlled video and photographs of his examination of ex ARH 1

20. Litts of Newport gun shop, South Wales, records relating to Operation Chalice and ARH1

21. Medica lrecords of bridget Craddockre Operation chalice and Orchid

22. Medical records of Dr Metters re Operations Chalice & Orchid The Cardiff Count Court to issue witness summonses, to the following, to attend 1CF93361 civil damages claim on behalf of the claimant:

i) Tim Dodson, clerk of court, with the claimant’s defense statement for T20097445 and court log

ii) Kirstie Kirk with records of her Operations Chalice and Orchid involvement

iii) Genevieve Kirk with records of her Operations Chalice and Orchid involvement

iv) ‘Foxy’, under cover police officer, with his records of Operations Chalice and Orchid

v) Nigel Brown of South Wales Police with his records of operation Chalice and Orchid

vi) Retired DC James Philips with his records of Operations Chalice and Orchid

vii) Retired inspector Phil Davies with his records of Operations Chalice and Orchid

viii) Police officer Kerslake with his records of Operations Chalice, Orchid & BS612159 damages claim

ix) Police officer Redrupp with his records of Operations Chalice and Orchid & BS612159 damages claim

x) Police officer Williams with his records of Operations Chalice Orchid & BS612159 damages claim

xi) Police officer Andrew Rice with records of Operations Chalic Orchid & BS612159 damages claim

xii) Police Officer Davidson with his records of Operations Chalice/Orchid & BS612159 damages

claim

xiii) Police Officer Morgan with his records of Operations Chalice/Orchid & BS612159 damages claim

xiv) Police Officer Dyson with his records of Operations Chalice/Orchid & BS612159 damages claim

xv) Appropriate Adult Mr Reeves who witnessed Operation Chalice and Orchid helicopter raid

xvi) Retired Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie OIC of Operations Chalice and Orchid

This list is far from exhaustive

3 Statement of Truth I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. ✓ I believe that the facts stated in section 10 (and any continuation sheets) are true.

The Applicant believes that the facts stated in section 10 (and any continuation sheets) are true. I am authorised by the applicant to sign this statement. Signature ✓ Applicant Litigation friend (where applicant is a child or a Protected Party) Applicant’s legal representative (as defined by CPR 2.3(1)

On the 18th May 2019 , on instructions from the Gold Group under the Chief Constable, the 2nd Defendant, the Governor of the Cardiff prison, allowed the theft of not just my G4S legal papers from my prison cell but blocked my mail both in and out of the prison for months on end

South Wales Police falsified OASys records circulated world wide and G4S containing falsified criminal convictions for firearms, child abuse and narcotics.

G4S staff leaked these highly unlikely convictions to both Cardiff and Parc prisons and my parole officer, signing off each one, who finally had them expunged from the record to immediately secure my release from prison following my favourable Parole Board hearing witnessed by retired Celia Jeune, my retired magistrate sister.

1. This application has arisen because from 10 May 2021 to 20^th May 2021 I was at a jury trial at Exeter Crown Court after which I was acquitted. Although attending my home address and accessing my emails I never saw any communication from Bristol County Court of a 15 May 2021 listing in case GA00TA220 or I could simply have said to Bristol court that I was at Exeter Crown Court on that day.

• I also paid a court fee of £10,000 which I believe demonstrates how seriously I regarded and committed I was to the G4S matter in Bristol linking it to BS614159 appeal (40 odd South Wales Police failed malicious criminal prosecutions) and the equally alarming 1CF03361 ‘trading in prohibited weapons’ civil claim also arising from South Wales Police malfeasance.

• I ask the Court also to take into account that in 2021 at 76 years I have what some may describe as an age-related cardiovascular deterioration (GP letter enclosed) where I have been in NHS hospitals inpatient ward three times in May and June 2021 and was given an assortment of medication for severe AF (atrial fibrillation). It is well known that an elderly person starting such medication will have very considerable problems with struggling to be able to think and organise themselves due to the oxygen starvation to the brain.
• My ‘significant brain damage’ condition was first recorded in the Caswell Clinic, South Wales medical report dated 19^th Oct 2009 by Dr TW, now sacked for rampant dishonesty, advising the 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, in my forced absence and without legal representation my real medical need for ‘legal representation’ in the imminent ‘machinegun’ trial.
• All in court knew, full well, I was bound to win the disgraceful allegations as the RAF and civilian gunsmiths had already deemed prosecution exhibit ARH1 not ‘decommissioned’ as the film prop had been put together for the film ‘Gunbus’ as a single shot 0.410 shot gun to fire star shells at air shows.
• Had paperwork for the 2000 Farnborough Airshow not been so daunting in the precious time remaining then Captain Brian Trubshaw, of 002 fame, would of had ‘his money’s worth when inviting me to display my replica 1916 Battle of the Somme DH2 biplane as I had other pyrotechnics as well in my ‘arsenal’

https://images.app.goo.gl/cnAvXoHg1Q7e8FMJ7

The ARH1 prosecution exhibit was in a shade of black when I bought it and then partially painted silver, on the ammunition magazine only, after sale to Gerry Cooper. Mysteriously to some but not the Claimant nor eight of the jury, commenting in the Cardiff pub, on 10th February 2010, in court the magazine was clearly painted back.

In June 2010 the exhibit was into another shade of ‘silver’ on the magazine when returned to Gerry Cooper. The police had returned the ‘gun’ with yet another shade of ‘silver paint’ with the mysterious three days between the Nottinghamshire police handing over the exhibit to the South Wales Police to have me prosecuted never being explained either at the criminal trial nor in the very unfair civl trail with my being denied the obviously needed witnesses and exhibits hidden all along by Gold Group in charge of both the criminal and civil trial.

It was sure comical to witness each of the original criminal prosecution witnesses in the now civil trial exercising their art learnt from their police college training for ‘selective amnesia’ when appropriate.

• The June 2009 armed police helicopter raid on our home, requiring over twenty officers on the ground in St Donats in the Vale of Glamorgan, was Gold Group’s Operation Challis under the control of Barbara Wilding due to her deliberately having written her February 2009 false sworn affidavit stating proper CPR disclosure had been conducted in both the BS614159 and T20097445 court cases.

My contacts in the police force informed me, after acquittal, that the main purpose of the police raid was to have me ‘lawfully shot’ as that month’s Gold and Silver Groups had been recorded by Elizabeth Paul and is one of my prosecution exhibits in 1CF03361 ‘gun’ case.

It is most important for the general public to know, as to what really goes on in our UK’s thoroughly deceitful judicial system that ‘Operation Challis’ was combined with ‘Operation Buttercup’ or Tulip was it, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, from that afternoon tea party, should I not be shot, as I was purported by the 15th June 2009 MAPPA committee, also under Wilding, to be a ‘very serious risk’ even to my family members!

The subject of ‘risk ‘ or ‘real risk‘ is not an expression completely unknown to the Kirk family with my oldest daughter’s grandfathers, one each side of the English Channel on D-Day, Dad operating as as a sabotage expert from an under ground OB (Operational base), in the event of German occupation, under either the Somerset Blackdowns or Quantock hills with the other as a commander in the French Resistance responsible for some of the D-Day preparation.

Belinda’s book, ‘Adventure Revolution’, destined to be a compulsory school book, admirably throws some light on the true meaning of ‘risk’ and especially as her grand mother cried upon hearing that I had bought a veterinary practice in South Wales, of all places!

• I brought the G4S case believing that there is a clear principle that it is essential for courts to respect prisoner’s rights because of the high level of control that a Prison has over its prisoner (eg responsible for prisoners’ letters to their respective MPs, for example – See my T20200177 alleged ‘stalking’ my own Conservative MP acquittal and equally ridiculous T20210178 Exeter Crown Court ‘bladed instrument found in my vehicle’ acquittal.

• Regards my compliance with Case Management my understanding is that whereas I can be asked to do obvious easily achievable points of civil procedure it is unfair and potentially unlawful to request a lay person representing themselves to display the skill of a lawyer.

• I also refer to Lord Chief Justice Thomas who, before the Justice Select Committee said the Judiciary are concerned that efforts claiming to make the county courts more efficient, were making the courts more unfair.

The 1CF03361 ‘gun’ case is now on appeal as it was clear that both HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc had been given orders by Gold Group to purloin my legal papers when ever possible including my correspondence either in or out of the prisons.

The general public needs to understand no Gold, Silver or Bronze Groups’ identifiable paperwork has ever been disclosed to their targeted victim in any of the police’s seventy odd malicious criminal prosecutions since its inception or since my buying the Vale of Glamorgan veterinary practice in 1993.

• I do not believe a lay person should be asked to cost out their claim as though having the skill of a lawyer but rather a lay claimant should only be asked to do as has occurred in UK Courts for centuries that a lay person has a right to bring an injustice, of such magnitude, before the court.
• It is noted, following the two million pound police legal bill muted by their QC in the October 2021 1CF03361 very unfair trial, all the culprits are ‘hell bent’ on stopping any forthcoming appeals or Welsh related costings analysis ever to get before an English court of law because fraud has been proved.    

• This claim arises from while I served an unlawful incarceration as I should have been released in March 2019 at G4S’s HMP Parc, Bridgend, South Wales so the Welsh police had concocted another now proven pack of lies as the Exeter jury fully understood. Witnessed and signed prisoner statements, seeing my prison mail stolen on most days need disclosure in this case and I am relying on the Honourable English Court to assist, thankyou.

• South Wales Police, the court heard from the CPS, had telephoned my MP in May 2019 informing her that because I had sent a letter (seeking help over my being harassed by the Welsh police with property stolen) I would remain in prison until December 2019 despite my release date being March 2019. The MP fortunately for me wrote the above facts in her MG11 witness statement.
• On 1^st Nov 2019 I was G4S violently assaulted by G4S staff who confiscated the full content of my cell refusing, they thought amusing at the time, in supplying me with the statutory inventory receipt of property stolen, as laid down by government regulations.

1.  These legal papers included, of course, the imminent ten year delayed 1CF03361civil claim evidence arising from South Wales Police’s T20097445 ‘trading in machineguns’ failed malicious criminal prosecution concocted by the then 2008 Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding while acting as Gold Group chairperson for the committee. Dr TW, of course, also sat on MAPPA level 3 category 3 monthly meetings to discuss my threat to their respective pensions.

As an aside it is of significant public interest to note that this year, thirteen years after the SWP ‘machinegun’ conspiracy was hatched, to stop my BS614159 plus other civil claims, His Honour Judge Petts stated I had been ‘dishonest’ when giving evidence on oath in the October 1CF03361’gun’ trial.

Interesting also is that the learned judge and police QC both commented that the Newport gun shop, after my 2010 acquittal, MUST of done ‘WORK’on prosecution exhibit, ARH1, to explain away the reason why Birmingham Proof House’ certificate clearly records it was never ever a prohibited weapon but, at most, a single shot 0.410 shot gun!!!!

The Newport gun shop staff all went ‘berserk’ when I was bombarded with their denials only to then quietly produce the certificate stating it was not even a ‘firearm’.

Far more important was a copy of their unpaid bill again submitted to the South Wales Police.

A simple call by a lawyer to the Newport gun shop confirmed, of course, no ‘work’ was allowed to be done by them on an alleged ‘prohibited weapon’.

1. , my three years of my Welsh GP medical records, my Caswell Clinic, Bridgend records specifically sent to me for my Taunton GP by Dr Gaynor Jones in November 2018 and clothes, books and two wheel chairs. They refused to hand them back even ignoring my Devon MP’s letter on the matter. As a consequence, I was prevented from case managing the machinegun claim and accordingly penalised for it at the October 2021 trial.

1. However, when I say confiscated my legal papers and possessions it was all more brutal than that. On 1 November 2019 my cell was raided by eight prison officers who, without explanation, filmed on body cams, rammed both my arms behind my back and forced on over tight handcuffs. Despite prior knowledge they had no regard for my previously broken wrist, thumb, elbow and shoulder.

1.  South Wales Police’s PNC remarkable disclosure, following my May 2021 MP alleged ‘stalking’ allegations acquittal revealed that during my G4S incarceration in 2018/19 there were, on record, my having previous false convictions including ‘firearms’, ‘child abuse’ and ‘narcotics’ (cultivating, supplying and using).

1.  Whereas the probation officer had success in having these convictions removed for my successful October 2019 Parole Board hearing, ordering my immediate release, there will be similar false data still remaining on my MAPPA 3/3, MG6C, PII and OASys etc police-controlled fairy tale records.

1. Five FALSE WARNINGS on the South /Wales Police’s PNC, including I was ‘likely to be violent upon arrest’, was revealed for the first time following my T20200177 MP/ police CPR disclosure under Article 6 etc.  

1. I was then violently carried from the prison and without my feet touching the ground placed inside a vehicle and driven out of Wales without my legal papers and possessions.  Two bundles of my mail almost thrown at me identified as urgent mail sent to Cardiff prison in early 2019 with the remainder addressed to me, in June onwards, in HMP Parc!     

1. Prior to 1st November 2019 while in custody under the control of G4S I was abused and denied adequate and appropriate medical care.

1. The abuse included assaults on my person, some recorded in my snatched Comp1/2 prison complaint forms, my being denied my daily Omeprazole, for weeks on end, required for a diagnosed carcinogenic lesion, Barrett’s Oesophagus, following a flying accident for James Bond film, ‘Moonraker’, splitting my diaphragm and significantly damaging my phrenic nerve.

1. Therefore, the tort includes:

1. G4S and prisoner assaults and thefts in the Parc prison

A lawyer opening my boxes some released G4S stolen property years later, still stealing two wheel chairs, legal files, medicines, clothes, my shoes and official inventory of my cell clearance, of course

e.

https://youtube.com/shorts/YOnq8A4VnEE?feature=share

• G4S induced assaults by prisoners on their misconceived belief of my having been convicted as paedophile, drug dealer and for having a conviction relating to 1968 section 5 prohibited weapons.

• G4S withheld my medicines for weeks

•  and denied the return of my Caswell Clinic medical records sent into the prison for me in November 2018 by Dr Gaynor Jones specifically for my GP

• HMP Cardiff also stole both my incoming and outgoing mail for HM Criminal Court of Appeal, Cardiff’s civil court, my GP and family.

• Both Welsh prisons deliberately confiscated my applications for Parole, medical help, RCJ appeals, G4S judicial review applications and the recent machine gun case 1CF03361 papers being heard now on appeal in some Cardiff court as I am denied, of course, access to The Royal Courts of Justice.

Some of my stolen legal files were only returned to me by G4S in August 2021

• G4S have stolen my MP/lawyer file including copies of letters to HM Secretary of State for Wales and MP I cannot name by court order, Holborn Adam solicitors, Law Society, Chris Daw QC and Bar Council.

• My clothes, shoes and two wheelchairs remain stolen.

This list of loss is not exhaustive

Temporary photographic evidence of some of the retrieved Claimant files from G4S recently from four boxes from HMP Parc opened and checked by law

• In addition to that critical principle to respect prisoners’ rights, this case is about conduct that is far more malicious than odd breaches of human rights and the background of why I was in HMP Parc is essential to grasp as a means to understand what motivates G4S and what is really going on.

Multi Agency working – colluding with errant police as a perception as to why G4S also acted in bad faith failing to disclose a Chief Constable was also in charge of Gold Group, the officer in charge of T20097445 unknown to the Claimant, 2017 jury or Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons over past 12 years.

• As in the 1CF03361 South Wales Police ‘machinegun’ conspiracy, to secure a 10-year mandatory prison term to block my imminent BS614159 civil claim, both G4S and HMP Cardiff conspired to pervert the course of justice.

• The background is important because it explains the motivation of G4S to try to do the same as SW police to obstruct if not swamp me with obstacles to make it difficult for me to manage my civil legal cases ALL against them.

• This claim arises in a context where I am in a long term dispute with SW Police and their partners through multi agency working where I alleged that every time I tried to bring a case before the civil courts to prove my point, mischief occurs by SW Police and their partners (such as Dr T W and G4S), try to undermine my case at the civil courts. (Dr TW was the author of my notorious 19^th Oct 2009 psychiatric report recommending I be further sectioned under the1983 Mental Health Act as an IPP prisoner in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital- meaning for life.

• By mid 2009 my case over years of harassment and deceit by SW Police was due to be heard at the civil court. The case concerned nearly two decades of being harassed by police trying to prosecute me and the sheer amount of times they tried to prosecute me made for an unassailable inference of mala fides.  I was acquitted or a case dropped over forty (40) times.. More than 40 prosecution cases were started and I won 89% at one point consisting of more than 123 criminal allegations. A trend which means that it is certain that the reasonable thinking man will suspect that some kind of mischief must be occurring (HHJ comment in 2000 BS614159 Bristol County Court hearing was an example of that).

• Regards this 2009/2010 remand and prosecution over a WW1 film prop dummy Lewis gun the jury believed me and I was promptly acquitted.

• But in August to December 2009 when SW Police felt their prosecution would fail they used their Gold Group  multi agency partner Dr TW to deploy reports he must have known were false to try to damage my credibility and get me sectioned to Ashworth indefinitely.

• Importantly Dr TW used a series of one month applications for sectioning to Dr TW’s clinic at the ABM NHS in Bridgend starting 3 August 2009 to assess whether I may have brain damage from aeroplane crashes. This was to assess whether I had brain damage affecting my behaviour which of course included the ability to manage my life.

• His colleague, Professor Rodger Wood, in on the act went further and said in writing my brain damage had been primarily due to my having been a ‘long term drinking partner, Actor, Oliver Reed;!

• However by 29 August 2009 two experts from the ABM NHS Bridgend Radiology Department decided I had a normal brain scan for a man of my age. Therefore, just like my claim against G4S, Dr TW sought to collude with SW Police by not only hiding my NHS formal all clear result from the Cardiff Crown Court but also Dr TW made the leap to an area of medicine in which he is not qualified, to assert as an expert that I had significant irreversible brain damage which impacted on my behaviour.

• Additionally Dr TW changed his early diagnosis to the Cardiff Crown Court of

“…….consistent with, but not diagnostic of a paranoid illness…”

Dr TW writing to Cardiff Crown Court early September 2009

• In contrast between October and December 2009 Dr TW was trying to Section me indefinitely to Ashworth now claiming I suffered from Paranoid Delusional Order but was unable to explain any unreasonable or unusual behaviour to justify him saying that, other than I was suing SW Police.

• Also the extreme number of attempted but failed prosecutions or like incidents, meant a reasonable person would think there was good reason to challenge SW Police.  Parliament has decided that legal action against the Chief Constable is the correct way to raise issue.

• Dr TW was seemingly colluding with SW Police by attempting to Section me indefinitely on 2 December 2009 at Cardiff Crown Court before a jury trial could occur in January/February 2010. But he failed because no other doctors would support him.

• SW Police now promote only the false report of Dr TW as if true while omitting from police records what all the other doctors say. Dr TW says in his report to the Cardiff Crown Court:-

“…My current preliminary position is that whilst Maurice Kirk is fit to plead, his difficulty in organising ……as a result of brain injury……..he would be unable to conduct his own defence

Dr TW point 11 dated 30 September 2009

• After my being acquitted by the jury in 2010 failed prosecutions that take up my time and resources did not stop.
• One of eight of the jury in a nearby public house physically dragged me into a public house near the Cardiff crown court in order to tell me that after the first day od evidence in a two week trial it was clear I had been ‘stitched up’

• As from 2010 while I tried to avoid SW Police and live in France, SW Police sent my local French police a copy of medical reports by Dr TW that police knew were untrue. I was locked up in a french lunnybin until recognised by a nurse remembering I had had a total hip replacement in there due to Guernsey police having left me handcuffed for many hours with a dislocated hip.

• Additionally in 2010 SW Police tried to prosecute me over trivia of whether trying to attend the civil court amounted to common assault and after a year of disruption to my life that was eventually thrown out of the Magistrates court.

• during the time period of of the BS614159 police incidents seven times I had HORT1producer documents served on me by south wales Police and seven times I flatly refused to produce, anymore, my driving licence, insurance and MOT documents that led to no cautions or prosecutions.

• Furthermore as from 2011 SW Police started a series of many prosecutions claiming that my trying to complain with accurate truthful references about them using false reports by Dr TW, amounted to harassment of Dr TW.

• I did manage a year free of SW Police where in 2016 I flew my aeroplane half way across Africa as reported with interest and excitement by the main UK news media and the main media across the world.

• But I could not complete the second stage of my 2016 Africa trip because SW Police arrested mled for two years for saying the truth in a Cardiff police station about Dr TW.

• My Cardiff Bay police station video account of the Dr T W/South Wales police conspiracy was never investigated

• SW Police do not like me saying the truth and I was given a two year sentence for publishing the truth and that is why I was at HMP Parc under the control of G4S.

Are my claims about saying the truth credible?

• Dr TW must have known he was doing wrong because in 2007/8 he wrote Chapter 19 “The expert witness: professional practice and pitfalls” in the Handbook of Forensic Mental Health (Pub: William 2008)explaining not to go beyond one’s expertise and to use other experts if issues are outside of one’s expertise. Therefore, when Dr TW is not medically qualified as a neurologist

•  Dr TW not only acted improperly but potentially even criminally in knowingly and so seemingly intentionally misleading the Crown Court, CPS and Police on important issues.

• We can see potential dishonesty regards Dr TW and police use of Paranoid Delusional Disorder (PDD) because they use PDD when they feel it could cause harm, but hide it from the four prosecutions when it would have reduced my sentence by half or even no sentence at all.

• We can use the example of the case of farmer Tony Martin who shot two young intruders as they fled his home. In the Tony Martin case PDD was an integral a part of the case and was the reason why he only received a reduced sentence of three years. Whereas Police and Dr TW arranged I served 5 years in prison for saying the truth on posters and on the interne

• The Police cannot avoid the fact that even though I was acquitted in the 2009/10 Lewis gun case a film prop dummy Lewis gun was not a firearm. Yet the police still have to this day placed on the Police National Computer (and so for the attention of police across the world) that I am a 2009 firearms risk and that I am violent.

Honest Opinions of experienced G4S staff differ to that of police.

• The staff at G4S did not find me as a violent or dangerous risk as SW Police maliciously say or having the severe medical conditions as Dr TW say and SW Police amplify.  It may well be one reason why G4S needed to hide my legal and other papers as G4S inadvertently prove the wrong SW Police do in persecuting me by a false assertion of risk that they know is not true.

Claimant won the Cardiff Crown Court jury trial in 2010 and the Exeter Crown Court jury trial in 2021 that both arose from a false assertion of risk 

• As from the 2009/10 prosecution that SW Police lost they still placed the Claimant on the Critical Public Protection Risk as one of the very most dangerous people in the UK where by Critical Public Protection Risk those procedures require police local to the prison to inform the constituency Member of Parliament when the person may be released into their constituency and what risk there is.

Abuse at HMP Parc

• When the Claimant was serving sentence for saying the truth at HMP Parc, SW Police took this opportunity of having placed the Claimant on the Critical Public Protection Risk to exaggerate risk to an MP so that she became hysterical from false assertion by SW Police so that she ineptly claimed that the Claimant asking his constituency Member of Parliament for help amounted to stalking. But yet again we have another prosecution by police that the jury at Exeter Crown Court did not believe. 

• G4S also may feel need to hide my legal and other papers because the papers can help me prove the both physical and mental abuse that occurred while I was at HMP Parc.

Example of HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc taking legal papers 

• I believe the harsh treatment and raids of my cell with the confiscation of my legal papers was instigated by SW Police via multi agency working because the same occurred while I was at HMP Cardiff.

• Please see the attached statement  by ….. prisoner statements (confiscated)

The Law

Last month’s high court ruling appears top support all my previous civil claims against the South Wales Police when exersising a Part 18applicationfor further disclosure was nearly always avoided.

• My understanding of the law is as online Human Rights groups say that –

“Make no mistake, no matter what your crime, you will be subject to the Prison Rules while you are a ‘guest of the state’, however many of your basic rights are unchanged. You still have the right to food, protection from assault and access to the courts.”

http://www.abouthumanrights.co.uk/prisoners-rights-if-convicted-crime-serving-sentence.html

• Regards the set aside of the previous decision I understand there is to be a level playing field fairness and with a priority support the overriding interests of justice.

• The Claimant did not see any notification from the County Court and would have easily responded if he had by saying he was at an Exeter Court trial. The Claimant was also an inpatient in hospitals for serious age- related cardiology problems. The Claimant understands the Court has good reason and discretion to set aside the previous decision if the Court so wishes.  

• Although some it the court system may wish to try to establish a harsh approach that squeezes out litigant in person from having access to the courts, I believe the senior Judiciary under appeal on points of law, cannot support the imbalance in power and unfairness that is occurring or asking lay people to act with the skills of lawyer. 

• The Claimant ask the court to give regard to the considerable ECHR rulings on prisoners right and although some ECHR case law is no longer binding in the UK Courts, the UK Courts are to still take notice of what rulings have occurred at ECHR:-
• https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Prisoners_rights_ENG.pdf

The Claimant wishes to get on with is life without all these disputes and court cases and ask that G4S return his legal papers and other possessions as a matter of urgency.

Dated 21st September 2021

DECEIT RIDDLED SOUTH WALES AUTHORITIES

Let us now summarise the level of deceit within the South Wales authorities requiring an Englishman to have his name removed from the veterinary register and gaoled for five years of his life in order to block both his BS614159 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions civil claim and his 1CF03361 equally scandalous ‘trading in prohibited weapons’ malicious criminal prosecution civil claim contrary to section 5 of the 1968 Firearms Act

For those who have access to court tapes of my BS614159 civil claim and court log you will quickly realise the level of lies within. That may explain why the Cardiff courts refuse to disclose either its court log yet alone an official transcript that was so orchestrated in order to block any now new evidence

No doubt the same will occur in the 1CF03361 and G4S case.

My faith in our UK judicial and executive systems was severely dented, recently, by successive courts refusing even the disclosure of their public records as they are so relevant to this G4S civil claim and robbery cover-up only achieved by a series of corrupt administrations.

My recent attempts with government departments, The Speaker of the House and party HQ, while desperate to get an MP to ask the right questions, including as to who was behind my robbery and theft of vital ‘machinegun’ papers while I was in Parc prison, requires an inde

Signed

MAURICE JOHN KIRK 

 Claimant in Person

To: Lieutenant General James Bashall 
           National President, Royal British LegionDear Lt. Gen. Bashall,   Neither the Royal British Legion or the MOD Veterans Dept have contacted 96-year-old Arctic Convoys veteran Norman Scarth.
1. I telephoned t e Royal British Legion this morning and request that they contact 96-year-old Norman Scarth.

2. I have printed off all emails below and have posted them directly to you. Please see below.

Your item was posted at Post Office® branch, Post Office on 12-11-2021. More information will be available as it travels through our network.Tracking number: NY702464677GBService used: Royal Mail Special Delivery Guaranteed 1pm™ 
Yours respectfully,
Leonard Lawrence

The proverbial hits the fan

So, ‘Parliamentary process’ is still in trouble over lobbying?

So is my MP in trouble, also directed by the same ‘Parliamtary procedure’, continuing to refuse to answer serious constituents cries for help contrary to ECHR

At my recent one million pound 1CF03361 ‘machine gun’ damages Cardiff claim, euphemistically called a trial before Judge Petts, retired Chief Stuart Superintendent Mackenzie was swiftly arrested following his being caught lying on the tape records.—

MY LEGAL PAPERS STOLEN BY G4S, in an act of robbery, are still required back for my appeal due shortly.

He said the 2008 Chief Constable Barbara Wilding Gold Group led criminal investigation, into my being ‘in possession’ of a ‘prohibited weapon’, was run by him and exclusively by him, which we all knew procedures for a MAPPA 3/3 registered victim by standard policing, was a blatant lie.

Chief Constable Barbara Wilding, the Defendant in my civil claims, had to have been in charge of her latest ridiculous allegations over a film prop replica WW2 Lewis machine gun , not just because she was also the Defendant in my 90s BS614159 forty three failed police malicious criminal prosecutions but it was listed, in January 2010, to soon ‘hit the proverbial fan’!

This meant the Gold, Silver and Bronze Group police investigations and their findings were deliberately kept completely hidden from the Criminal and Civil Procedure Rules procedures of ‘disclosure’ of facts identifying malfeasance.

It identifies yet another tranche of deceitful senior SWP officers not disclosed under primary or secondary CPR in the daft maliciously brought ‘machine gun’ criminal trial either, such is the level of welsh so called ‘justice’ for those interested into what ‘what actually goes on in our UK law courts.

This is my witness statement pertaining to the current Exeter Crown Court case connected to MAURICE J. KIRK,
Regarding:
1] the Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Mr. M. JUKES  and2] the entity known as G4S PLC [who run “security staff” – warders – in the relevant prisons Mr. MAURICE KIRK is connected to in this matter: HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc, during 2019].
These 2 subjects were asked, during September 2019, via a formal F.O.I.A. [S.A.R. / DPA requests, for a copy of this letter authored by Maurice Kirk and meant to be sent to myself during May 2019 – this letter being stopped from leaving HMP Cardiff by the G4S prison employees and/or SWP in May 2019 as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] [referring to the charge M KIRK was remanded in custody regarding].
Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of South Wales police was sent the FOIA request on the 17 September 2019; GFS PLC were sent the FOIA request on the 28 September 2019.
This withheld letter obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself – the charge pertaining to that, which also enforced the custodial remand of Maurice Kirk, being dropped also at a later date by the CPS.My F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. requests have not been responded to by anyone, to date.
 Signed: This is a true sworn statement and signed by myself John Graham on the 11 May 2021.
Attached are:the F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. request sent to G4S PLC –
an identical request was sent to Mr. Jukes, of SWP, also attached.The acknowledgement letter from G4S PLC re: my request Acknowledgement from SWP’s “Disclosure Team”s Mr. Jenkins, telling me to write to G4S PLC, not SWP.My F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. request has not been responded to by anyone, to date.

Another example of SWP’s total disregard for the rule of law

THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF MY MP

That must explain why my designated MP refuses to answer any of my pleas, my letters from Welsh prisons, for help both before and following the 1st November 2019 robbery by by G4S Park prison staff to steal, on behalf of the South Wales Police, my ‘machine gun’ privileged legal papers together with my clothes & wheel chairs. Someone clearly needs a visit.

and now a touch of England you so detest

I again invite feedback from the general public, especially from others that have suffered under South Wales injustice. I have already received on phone, emails and comments on my regular blogs depicting the sheer scale of South Wales Police’s malicious criminal conduct to pervert the course of justice .

Oh what fun…my appeal is being blocked, it would appear.

The subtle difference between my knowledge and the learned judge’s assumption, is that I have found over near 30 years of my life in that hell hole Wales of court deceit, is that I have now been accused by a judge of lying, I sold a film prop for film , Gunbus, when knowing the replica 1916 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun was a prohibited weapon!

Where is the logic in that?

Belinda Kirk

7h  · My book has been nominated for Outdoor Book Of The Year https://www.tgomagazine.co.uk/…/shortlists-announced…/ Please can you vote for me … See moreTGOMAGAZINE.CO.UKVote now in The Great Outdoors Reader Awards 2021! | TGO MagazineWe’ve received hundred

War fears explode as 16 Chinese fighter jets enter Taiwan’s airspace – island on alert

My dear friends of Taipei flying club is there anything I can do for you in UK re Chinese aggression?

My memories of my film talk in the pub and horrendous departure, next daym in a cub in a torrential storm to South Korea are vivid!!!!!!!!

Breton cottage for just £55,000

Norman Scarth RN

A victim of such a corrupt UK legal system

Christopher Fogarty	19:12 (10 minutes ago)
to Mary

Norman Scarth 96 years of age, lives in Ireland, a political refugee from England.

He had operated an equestrian business in Leeds until a politically-connected customer falsely sued him and won the case. Norman appealed the case to the top of Britain’s judicial system; unsuccessfully.
By then, indigent, he took his case, pro se, to the European Court of Human Rights where he not only won, but that court also ordered Britain to cease conducting secret trials.

Upon Norman’s return, victorious, to Leeds, his troubles really began. Norman’s support for the Inland Revenue-robbed Irishman Patrick Cullinane and others targeted by British State criminals may have been a factor  He was raided in his home by some nineteen constables who claimed that Norman, a 120 pound septuagenarian, had injured one of them. They managed to convict him of criminal assault and he was incarcerated for years in a prison for the criminally insane until prison psychiatrists managed to force the gov’t to release him. Once freed, Norman was subject to yet more crimes by the constabulary. He eventually fled England to Ireland where he has lived for the past few decades.

Please forward this to any English pol who might be interested in justice.
Chris

AND ANOTHER

Dear Sir,

Thank  you for your email, for your information I have set out below a brief outline of my case circumstances and the Irregularities and injustice involved in my issues with the SWP and its Senior Leadership Miscreants. 

Suffering from Work Overload for a considerable period of time – Senior Management disregarded the fact – although following my departure TWO Police Officers were seconded into the Licensing Department – ACC Lewis went on record (Media Wales) stating that “The Cardiff Licensing Department was the busiest Licensing Department in the U K”.

Well documented periods of sickness – stress and anxiety.

Wrongly accused of criminality by two unreliable Criminal Informants.

Operation Kansas – was a lengthy (eighteen months duration) and costly (profligacy) unfounded Police Surveillance Operation that was mounted against me.

Civil Liberties – Despite enshrined Human Rights Laws – Article 8 and 10 of the ECHR – Breaches of RIPA 2000 were carried out against me which was a complete misuse of Anti-terror Laws – there was no evidence, grounds / basis to allow for the level of surveillance that took place. An Abuse of Power.

This abuses included unlawful Directed and Intrusive Surveillance and telecoms interception under the guise of RIPA 2000 which was carried out by a corrupt and disgraced Professional Standards Department.

The grounds given to the ‘Delegated Officer’ for the Authorisations and Renewals of the Police Surveillance were all manufactured / fabricated and regularly changed when there was NO evidence to warrant any further Police Surveillance in order to accommodate further surveillance to be unlawfully carried out by the SWP.

This surveillance included listening devices planted in my home, telecoms interception of my Private Telephone calls, my Police Office, etc.

SWP – PSD / ACU committed PERJURY in respect of applications made to Judge for for a ‘Production Order’ and in an application to a Magistrate for a ‘Search Warrant’. It has been suggested to me that the ‘Search Warrant’ issued by a Magistrate to search my home was NOT in fact for that purpose but to recover the unlawfully placed SWP surveillance equipment – without compromise? 

After some 18 months of unlawful surveillance – no evidence of any criminality was ever found – as there was none to find.

Please see the case of: Mark Dias and Steve Mathews – Cleveland Police. Breaches of RIPA 2000 aconspiracy to ruin lives – 2017.

Please also see the case of : Johnny Johnson – SWP  ‘A series of Mistruths’: How evidence against hero cop cleared of assault charge was described – 2014. 

Then without any evidence of any wrongdoing the SWP carried out ‘Unlawful Arrests’ on me my wife and others.

When there was NO evidence of any criminal offences disclosed – so the SWP then introduce HMRC and alleged – Tax Evasion.

There is an irregularity in respect of the HMRC investigation – HMRC state that they were NOT involved in any investigation against me or my wife until some six months after our arrests – so does this mean that the PACE Recorded interview which was conducted by a person who purported to be a Greg Jones of HMRC – was bogus?

HMRC will NOT confirm where Greg Jones works from and will NOT provide me with any copies of the NOTES made by Greg Jones allegedly from HMRC (contrary to the DPA / GDPR) that were made during the first PACE Recorded Interview with him and one SWP – PSD Officer. So was Greg Jones an imposter?  

Tax Evasion. – however, following THREE subsequent interviews with a confirmed HMRC Investigator my wife and my Tax Affairs were found to be completely in order, no criminal or civil offences disclosed and NO penalties imposed. 

Cover up at all costs – a witch-hunt then ensued – an unlawful targeting – look for anything to justify the SWP’s unlawful actions carried out against me and others.

A Kangaroo Court – (Secret Court) – some time later a Gross – Misconduct Allegation Hearing took place against me which was has since been established to be a patently obvious breach of the Home Office – Police (Conduct) Regulations in respect of the constitution of the Misconduct PANEL an absolute ‘Conflict of Interest’ situation, a breach of the Rule against Bias, Statutory Conspiracy, Misconduct in Public Office, Pervert the Course of Justice, Obstruction of Justice, etc. 

A Kangaroo Court (Secret Court) – Civil Liberties – Article 6 of the ECHR – evidence to my benefit was missing or never produced, I was denied access to witnesses, evidence both medical and otherwise was discounted without any evidence ever being produced by the SWP – PSD to refute or rebut my submission – such actions by the SWP have only brought the Police Misconduct Allegation Hearing process into – DISREPUTE. 

Minimum effort on the part of the SWPF / PFEW appointed Solicitor and Barrister – don’t try to hard we want to ensure the end result – DISMISSAL – I was dismissed for what was said to be Gross – Misconduct which was an Abuse of Process and a Miscarriage of Justice.

Gross – Misconduct is NOT clearly defined and appears to be open ended and is therefore wide open to professional and personal abuse and is a misuse of the already too elastic ‘Balance of Probability’. 

Isolated and abandoned by my so called representative body the SWPF / PFEW (I’m Alright Jack) I was informed by the SWPF – Secretary that there was NO more Police Federation Legal Funding for me for any Appeals against my dismissal and or an Employment Tribunal.

I am a Chief Constable I can do what I like. I was failed by the SWP – Senior Leadership and its Crime Commissioner – Alun Michael who acted unlawfully and ultra vires – beyond their powers in denying me an Appeal against my dismissal from the SWP and in some other matters.

I was failed by the Home Office appointed Chair of the Police Appeals Tribunal – Mr Richard Merz in respect of my deeply flawed and perverse Gross – Misconduct Hearing and in my subsequent application for a Police Appeal Tribunal process. Despite there being ‘New Evidence’ available.

I was failed by the Home Office appointed Head of the Wales Region of the IOPC – Catrin Evans and Co in respect of my complaints made to the IOPC of criminality with the SWP – PSD and its Senior Leadership. The IOPC alleges that it oversees the Police Complaints system and sets the standards by which the Police SHOULD handle complaints – the IOPC is NOT fit for purpose.

Delay and concealment – I was denied access to specific data – breaches of the DPA / GDPR, PACE, Police Reform Act, etc.

I was failed by the recommended Crown appointed Information Commissioners Office – Elizabeth Denham and Co – in respect of my complaints to them about breaches of the DPA / GDPR against the SWP – the ICO alleges that they uphold information rights in the public interest, promoting OPENNESS by public bodies and data privacy for individuals – the ICO is NOT fit for purpose.

I was provided with copies of my PACE Recorded Interview by the SWP. However, that CD copy had been edited and extracts had been removed. I have thus far been denied access by the SWP to the Master CD of my Pace Recorded Interviews – in order that I may make a comparison – Spoliation / Tampering with Evidence, Statutory Conspiracy, Misconduct in Public Office, Pervert the Course of Justice, Obstruction of Justice, etc, etc which is a recurring theme within the SWP who have history of being discredited in Major Investigations.

Lies and Deceit – a cover up, mind boggling incompetence, dishonesty, leadership failings, cronyism, profligacy, persistent and malicious lawbreaking, blame avoidance, stifle accountability, minimise reputational damage and an unsavoury tendency to use precious police resources and public funds to smear, bully, vex, annoy and harass critics.

The propensity to cover up rather than address or rectify, the SWP’s many failings is constant and at times seriously shocking, steeped in rotten culture. There is an absence of ‘Portfolio Responsibilities’ and ‘Accountability’.

A. Roach.  

Sir Lindsay Hoyle MP, tonight, blocked my application for an MP allocation re G4S South Wales Police  ‘machine gun’ robbery

In the light of the Speaker of the House’s refusal, today, to allocate an appropriate MP to ask obvious questions over the vicious robbery, two years ago today by G4S Park prison to steal my legal files, re South Wales Police’ chief constable’s ‘machine gun conspiracy, my current intention is to represent Taunton Deane as ‘what really is going on’ in our law courts and community that needs radical reform?.

IS IT TRUE THAT WE HAVE A GENERAL ELECTION SOONER THAN LATER?

.Maurice seeks help from Mr Speaker from HM House of Commons

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL                                                REF. NO.

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

THE QUEEN

– v –

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

_____________________________________________________________

AMENDED GROUNDS OF APPEAL AGAINST THE
MAKING OF A RESTRAINING ORDER

_____________________________________________________________

DRAFT REDACTED VERSION

(These grounds have been prepared with the assistance of lay McKenzie advisers assisting Mr. Kirk with Mr. Kirk’s permission, who was unrepresented at the trial and conducted his own defence.)

APPEAL AGAINST THE MAKING OF A RESTRAINING ORDER UNDER SECTION 5A(5)(A),(B) OF THE PROTECTION OF HARASSMENT ACT 1997

1. The Appellant was acquitted of 1 count of Harassment by Stalking, contrary to section 2A(a),(b) of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 before HHJ Johnson and a jury at the Crown Court at Exeter on 20^th May 2021.

• At the conclusion of the trial, HHJ Johnson imposed a Restraining Order for a limited time against the Appellant under section 5A(1) of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 on the same date in respect of an MP.

• The Appellant now seeks leave to appeal against the making of that Restraining Order as though it had been made on his conviction as part of his sentence under section 5A(1),(5)(a),(b) of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

LACK OF PROPER REASONS JUSTIFYING THE MAKING OF THE RESTRAINT ORDER

• It is contended that although the learned Judge applied the correct civil standard of proof on a balance of probabilities in making the Restraining Order against him, the learned Judge failed to give sufficient reasons for the making of the Order, in view of the fact that the Appellant had been acquitted of the charge against him by the jury.

• In particular, the learned Judge failed to identify the acts or any specific acts in relating to the Appellant’s conduct that in his view would have justified the Restraining Order being made against the Appellant.

ARTICLE 10(1) ECH, HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998

• The learned Judge erred in law and/or in principle in directing that the Appellant may not publish anything concerning an MP, thereby interfering with the Appellant’s “right to freedom of expression” under article 10(1) ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998.

• Further, the learned Judge failed to take into account or consider the Appellant’s “Convention Rights” and in particular his “right to freedom of expression” under article 10(1) ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998 when making the Restraining Order against him.

• The prohibition against the Appellant from publishing anything about an MP restrains the Appellant from commenting on the competence and reliability of an MP, when such matters as to her conduct in not responding to the Appellant’s requests to her and her constituency officer for help is a matter of public interest and importance regarding the democratic system and accountability of elected MPs to their electorates.

• In the premises, the making of the Restraining Order against the Appellant was disproportionate and was not “prescribed by law, or “necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary” for the purposes of article 10(2) ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998.

MEDICAL REASONS AND GROUNDS

1. During the Exeter hearing before the learned Judge, the Appellant experienced medical problems that he had not experienced before and medical evidence will be sent to the court regarding this.

1. The outcome of the Atrial Fibrillation caused the Appellant confusion and with the loss of the Appellant’s hearing aids at the hearing, the Appellant was deprived of a clear understanding of the relevance of a Restraining Order being required following an obviously predicted acquittal. (The CPS had conceded the Appellant sent only two letters to an MP, which is not correct and were a year apart!).

1. During the morning of 10^th May 2021, the Appellant had to go to the accident and emergency Department of Exeter Hospital by ambulance from the court, and the learned Judge was informed regarding this, so that the proceedings did not resume until the afternoon session.

1. The Appellant’s condition caused memory loss with the lack of oxygen to his brain for proper concentration so that he was unable to comprehend the circumstances of the order being sought.

Dated 28^th Oct 2021

Signed

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Appellant in Person

My emails for an MP’s help, re G4S robbery to my Parliament building, are being blocked .. . I will therefore have to jump to PLAN J

At the Conservative Party’s London HQ yesterday, despite a judge’s directions, I was again refused an MP to act on my behalf concerning the Wales G4S robbery to steel my legal papers against Gold Group chief, Barbara Wilding, because the then HM Secretary of State, Alun Cairns MP, was sent from my prison cell what was believed to be heroin we were told. I was further gaoled for a further five months for apparently sending what was believed to be anthrax spores to another MP

Could Enid Blyton have written a better fairy tale?

HM Speaker of The House of Commons

Westminster

London SW1 1AA

31st October 2021

Dear Sir,

I apologise for taking up any of your very busytime but I have nowhere else to turn to as the Exeter Crown Court directed me to email my constituency member of parliament for help over my ignored South Wales Police statement of complaint (incident number incident number1900418801).

(Extract)

10^th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff

I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions……..

Sir Lindsey Hoyle, none of my letters to my MP have been replied to.

I therefore asked my past MP, Alun Cairns MP but he also ignores my letters. I turned to my then temporary parliamentary representative for North Devon, Ms Selaine Saxby MP.

Ms Saxby immediately wrote to the G4S barbarically run Welsh prison, where the brutal robbery took place and has also between repeatedly ignored, of course, ever since.

Please, can anyone else, of any political persuasion, take on the Taffia for my property back which include two wheelchairs, clothes and current Cardiff County Court and RCJ ‘machinegun’ legal papers?

Thankyou

Yours faithfully,

Maurice j Kirk BVSc

Taunton, Somerset, England.

Defendant’s Legal Submission

      An idle MP and Maurice John Kirk were like ‘two ships passing in the night’

Extracts from 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act

Prohibition of harassment

• A person must not pursue a course of conduct— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
• Subsection (1) [ F4or (1A)] does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows— (a) that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,

2 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c. 40) Document Generated: 2021-03-25 Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. (See end of Document for details) (b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or (c) that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.

The fundamental issue was an ‘objective’ one while both parties in the case had quite different ‘subjective’ beliefs much based  on ‘hearsay’

The 1^st November 2019 robbery of the Defendant, by staff of G4S Custodial Services in HMP Parc, Bridgend, South Wales, resulted in the loss of the South Wales Police’s victim’s personality.

The victim’s stolen ‘personalty’ includes:

1. his clothes
2. his shoes
3. his two wheelchairs
4. legal papers including from his civil claim 1CF03361 (trading in machine gun conspiracy)
5. his BS614159 papers resulting from 40 odd failed police malicious criminal prosecutions
6. his 3 years of NHS (Wales) record currently being requested by his GP, cardiac and gastroenterologist specialists in Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, Somerset
7. his full 2009/10 records from Glanrhyd Hospital’s Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, resulting from three months of horrific incarceration under section 35 of 1983 Mental Health Act.

At Conservative Party HQ, yesterday, I was refused an MP to act on my behalf concerning the G4S robbery to steel my legal papers against Gold Group chief, Barbara Wilding, because then Secretary of State, Alun Cairns MP, was sent from my prison cell what was believed to be heroin we were told.

10^th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff

I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions.

Serious Assaults   (Article 3)                                                                             Incident 1900418801

1. After my Feb 2019 unlawful ‘recall’ to prison from a Cardiff parole hostel I was assaulted on numerous occasions in Parc prison with one incident already reported over the ‘floor buffer’  on A2 wing. All required medical attention and captured on CCTV & body cameras. 
2. The 2^nd filmed significant assault was in June 2019 when I was forcibly removed from my 2^nd missing wheel chair by unnecessary force from seven officers carrying me back to B block.
3. The 3^rd main incident was in Nov 2019 when I was snatched from my cell by unprovoked excessive force using no less than eight G4S officers using handcuffs on my wrists behind my back. This deliberate pain was inflicted from B wing to the main gate where I was ‘released’ for Bristol Royal Infirmary attention. This included x-rays due to my hip prosthesis having suffered partial subluxation of my hip joint and prescription analgesics for a month.
4. The incidents have left me feeling severely intimidated, vulnerable and in constant pain.

Deliberate False Forensic History Yet Again (Article 6)

1. In Sept & Dec18 G4S had inadvertently released Caswell Clinic medical data by fabricated police criminal convictions including ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘narcotics’, ABH and ‘FTA’.
2. Oct 19 HM Parole Board hearing, with evidence from a retired magistrate, had also revealed why a prison had needed such violent ‘constraints’. Both parole officer & prison supervisors had vehemently opposed release as I was, ‘violent and extremely dangerous’. To whom was I a danger, exactly, turned out to be only the Chief Constable? This caused my swift release.
3. That CCTV and more leaked 2009 Barry police station MAPPA level 3 category 3 data of Barbara Wilding’s conspiracy, to have me shot, is applied for to be disclosed at the ‘machine gun’ hearing on 24^th January as it all identifies the original culprit’s nefarious conduct. 

‘Heroin’ to Alun Cairns MP & ‘Anthrax Spores’ to another MP false Allegations  (Article 8)

4. My Feb 19 release was due so police concocted reasons to stop my mail in and out of Cardiff & Parc prisons to protract time in prison and delay my civil claims. The ‘white powder’ found in my two MP letters had simply been remaining traces of toothpaste originally used for gluing exhibits onto my cell wall when originals had been stolen by my key liaison officer.

Further Deliberate Theft of my Possessions (Article 7)

Despite my pleadings and requests by parole staff G4S continues to refuse to return my wheelchair and legal papers as the latter is needed, of course, for my 10am 24^th January 2020 civil court proceedings against both G4S and the South Wales Police. Today’s MG11 VPS written complaint to very patient South Wales police officers will, no doubt, end up in the police HQ shredder as did the ones, re police paint gun, to try and fool the 2010 jury!

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

As predicted in such a thoroughly corrupt welsh judiciary my eleven year running civil claim against the South Wales Police machine gun bloody nonsense conspiracy, the T2009745  criminal jury laughed out of court despite the police plant amongst them they told us about in the Cardiff pub afterwards. I now appeal with the aid of a barrister who has appeared to have poked his head over the parapet!

AS PREDICTED, SOUTH WALES POLICE ARE AGAIN BLOCKING MY  REVEALING VIDEOS

In the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre                                                  1CF03361

                                      MAURICE JOHN KIRK                              Claimant

                                                        V

                   THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES        Defendant 

———————————————————————————————–

CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSIONS CONCERNING RESPONDENT’S REQUEST

                            FOR A CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER

———————————————————————————————–        

1. The relevant practice direction is Practice Direction 3C, which provides for three kinds of civil restraint order, a limited civil restraint order, an extended civil restraint order and a general civil restraint order. A limited order may be made where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit.

An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit.’

A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate.’

• The Defendant cites the order of Morgan J in BS614159, an order some 8 years old. In fact an application was subsequently lodged before Newey J by the writer and that learned judge made no such criticism. They cite the order of Tipples J dated the 3^rd September 2021 and the order of HHJ Petts dated the 17^th September 2021 refusing the Claimant’s application for witness summonses and specific disclosure.

The ‘without merit threshold’

• The Defendant relies on Ghassemian Hamila Sartipy (Aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc (2019)EWCA Civ 225 a case wherein the Appellants had perpetrated fraud on both the Respondents and the court and whose application was manifestly bogus. That is not the situation here.

• It is averred the Respondents have had conduct of one of the most shameful  chapters in the history of South Wales Police after the Lynette White Cardiff 5 trial. It is accepted that the Claimant has become overtly suspicious of judges and lawyers, has been constrained to litigate in person because of the sheer enormity and costs implications of the task before him and has frequently used florid language in accusing judges, courts and the police of being in partnership against him. None of these factors should be held against him against the highly unusual and alarming circumstances of BS614159 and 1CF03361 which, if they had been visited on any  other single human being would have undoubtedly caused a reasonable onlooker, armed with the facts, to conclude all the Claimant’s claims were both meritorious and justified.

• The Claimant was a practising vet and highly respected, even employed by South Wales Police. He was a daredevil aviator but one whom the Civil Aviation Authority saw fit to allow to fly and participate (as recently as 2016) in Vintage Air Rallies. Notwithstanding representations by The Defendant that the Claimant brought prosecutions upon himself the Defendant managed to attempt to arrest, charge or prosecute him on no less than 33 occasions and each attempt was wholly without merit (BS614159). The Claimant invited a holistic approach, even pleading that 1CF03361 was the ‘end-game’ of BS614159. He was to be disappointed. The sheer volume of material before it persuaded the court there ought to be two trials and not one. His Honour Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC faced a daunting task but invited each incident to proceed as though in isolation of all the others permitting witnesses  each time to deny their knowing Maurice John Kirk so there was no ‘over-arching’ conspiracy to do him down. With the deepest of respect, that was not necessarily the realistic approach. On oath during the recent trial in 1CF03361 DC Stuart Davies accepted most police officers were certain to have heard of the famous flying vet, Maurice John Kirk. The statistical probability of 33 incidents all being pure accidents prompted Mr. Justice Jack to question the sheer volume as heposed the question  what is going on?    

• The Claimant does not accept the judgment in BS614159. Would any other person in his shoes? Does that make his applications to appeal without merit? Surely not. Matters progressed with 1CF03361. In that matter the Claimant’s case was that the case notes of Operation Chalice revealed South Wales Police resurrected the Claimant having a vintage aeroplane as BS614159’s trial date approached. They prosecuted his having a prohibited weapon with extreme prejudice. The timing was significant. Case notes purported to show officers conspicuously and suspiciously searching the Claimant’s legal papers in search of evidence of a gun sale 12 months in the past so as to preserve the integrity of the organisation. The Defendant denied the magistrates’ decision to grant the Claimant bail and procured his remand in custody for no less than eight months.

• Matters took a more sinister turn. On the 8^th June 2009 at Barry Police Station (the hub of all activity in BS614159) a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) set in motion a categorisation of the Claimant that was wholly unjustified. As someone who was MAPPA 3 he was now a danger to himself and others. A psychiatric report by a tame expert could have resulted in the Claimant being incarcerated in a mental institution for life. That tame expert’s report was contradicted over the years that followed by no less than five other psychiatric reports. What would the proverbial ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’ make of all this?

• Inevitably the Claimant was acquitted. This case was brought by the Claimant who invited the court to consider the following matters:

• Mr. Rydeard (Forensic Expert) accepted he had in his many years witnessed only a handful of collectors such as The Claimant prosecuted in this way. Why was he?

• Former Detective Superintendent McKenzie accepted he instigated MAPPA  so why did the court find he ‘mis-spoke’? Why was this admission ignored?

• If the ‘machine gun’ had been a real automatic why were Home Office ACPO Guidelines  against prosecution in the public interest not adhered to? Why did the court not allow the Claimant to rely on these as part of his case when they had both been pleaded and served in October 2020 by him?   

• Section 58 Firearms Act 1968 provided a statutory defence to the Claimant. There was no way of showing the Claimant as opposed to others modernised the exhibit. Three witnesses attested to the fact that the gun had been tampered with.

• The Defendant could provide no explanation as to why the gun appeared to go to Chepstow Forensic Science Services. Did the Police make the gun capable of firing? A crucial witness did not attend trial suspiciously yet his evidence was accepted by the court even though the Claimant challenged his evidence.

• Firearms expert Mr. Rydeard said ‘once a machine gun always a machine gun’. The exhibit could not be ‘down-graded’ by subsequent modification. When confronted by the Birmingham Proof House certification the exhibit was a ‘single shot gun’  both Mr. Rydeard and the court  leapt on the explanation Litts the Sportsman had a capacity to modify the gun when there was evidence this certainly was not the case.

• It is true the Claimant further feels aggrieved that his request for trial by jury was formally pleaded by him as long ago as 2011 and yet he was denied. He argued the Defendant be estopped from denying him his statutory right by dint of their pleaded response in their 2011 Defence. The Particulars of Claim were amended and a fresh Defence permitted. It was disingenuous to say that request was ten years old.

1. Of course any litigant in the Claimant’s position would seek to obtain redress. If these claims and applications were without merit  then why were they allowed to go to trial by senior judges exercising their court management powers? Why was the machine gun case kept alive for in excess of ten years? Why was the Defendant afforded the luxury of Leading Counsel at great public expense if all one was fronted with were the ramblings of an idiot?

1. Most disturbing of all, why was the Defendant’s continued conduct in having the Claimant incarcerated in recent years (again without merit MP Exeter Crown Court prosecution) permitted to prevail so that the Claimant was denied Relief from Sanctions when he was incarcerated and documentary evidence served on the court showed they had stolen all his case papers whilst in prison?

1. The Claimant renewed Leave to Appeal The Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey’s refusal to grant Relief from Sanctions and to allow the Claimant trial by jury. Great play is made of the observations of Tipples J on the 3^rd September. With the deepest of respect if, as claimed by the Learned Judge, the Claimant had failed to request an oral hearing why any hearing before Tipples J at all? Why did the Defendant file a document entitled Respondent’s skeleton Argument for Oral Permission Hearing 3^rd September 2021?  The Claimant will aver matters were not assisted by the fact his legal representative could neither hear not understand Tipples J because of technical difficulties.

1. In conclusion, if any ECRO is granted the court merely compounds the Claimant’s overall position that he was deprived of the right to call evidence, deprived a fair trial and all the indicia of bias he is told are but phantoms of his mind are, regrettably, fact.

David Jonathan Leathley

29^th September 2021

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/sacked-police-officer-launches-le

gal-17149915

Conservative Party Head Office

London                                                                                                                   29th September 2021

Dear Sir/Madam

My MP is still ignoring my letters for help over South Wales Police G4S Robbery

Despite guidance from my judge, His Honour Judge Johnson in Exeter Crown Court, for me to write to my MP with regards to the brutal attack in HMP Park, Bridgend, to steel my ‘machine gun’ civil claim papers for the South Wales Police, I am continuously ignored.

I wonder just how many others in the constituency are being ignored by the same MP when their specific pleas for help are on matters as serious as mine?

There stands a restraining on me which is illegal as my two acts of writing for help were a year apart.

All my attempts to have a restraining order varied or quashed remain ignored by the courts. Such is the true state of our law courts should you be so bold or so stupid as to scrape off their thin layer of camouflage to expose, yet again, the ‘can of worms’ lurking beneath in our UK judiciary

The South Wales Police have consistently instigated barbarity, by G4S for example, ever since my Bristol lawyers, upon a comment from a Bristol judge, that Dolmans, solicitors for the Welsh police, should mediate and ‘settle out of court’ for losing over 40 now malicious criminal prosecutions.

Adrian Oliver of Dolman refuses each time or the taxpayer funded ‘gravy train’ will hit the buffers.

The masonic devil worshipping bunch in Bridgend’s police HQ were caught red handed in June 2009 when, while the deputy head of their legal department assisted me to their then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding’s private office, lo and behold was Adrian Oliver also attending, no doubt, for both Gold Group and MAPPA level 3 category 3 clandestine meeting to have me eliminated.

My ten year running BS614159 substantive civil claim, for the forty odd lost criminal prosecutions, was listed for trial that very summer and so  had to be stopped by their ‘machinegun’ conspiracy.

Hence the hurriedly arranged HQ MAPPA meeting on the very day I had accessed Wilding’s inner sanctum, to ‘exchange witness files’, only to be surrounded by machinegun tin hatted police sporting stun grenade laden flak jackets and itchy fingers. Real Enid ‘Noddy Land’ stuff had it not been so true

My two recent farcical South Wales Police instigated failed jury trials, in Exeter Crown Court, are so serious a miscarriage of justice, a restraining order had to be immediately applied to block ‘what really goes on’ in the dark corners of the House of Commons and damned the expense!

Just as in the Welsh police doctor’s fabricated 19^th Oct 2009 psychiatric report, for my Ashworth incarceration for life, the tax payer must never find out that our UK law courts have nothing to do with the veracity of the presiding judge or HM Crown Prosecution Service as it is all run under ‘HM Partnership’, as Patrick Cullinane Esq so aptly coined it, a multimillion funded ‘ gravy train for those in the club all promised to immunity to prosecution , such as one Adrian Oliver and his entourage.

Will you help me, please or do I have to stand against an idle bitch living off immoral earnings?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

South Wales Police NOW ask for my new Restraining Order!

In the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre                                                  1CF03361

                                      MAURICE JOHN KIRK                              Claimant

                                                        V

                   THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES        Defendant 

———————————————————————————————–

CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSIONS CONCERNING RESPONDENT’S REQUEST

                            FOR A CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER

———————————————————————————————–        

1. The relevant practice direction is Practice Direction 3C, which provides for three kinds of civil restraint order, a limited civil restraint order, an extended civil restraint order and a general civil restraint order. A limited order may be made where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit.

An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit.’

A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate.’

• The Defendant cites the order of Morgan J in BS614159, an order some 8 years old. In fact an application was subsequently lodged before Newey J by the writer and that learned judge made no such criticism. They cite the order of Tipples J dated the 3^rd September 2021 and the order of HHJ Petts dated the 17^th September 2021 refusing the Claimant’s application for witness summonses and specific disclosure.

The ‘without merit threshold’

• The Defendant relies on Ghassemian Hamila Sartipy (Aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc (2019)EWCA Civ 225 a case wherein the Appellants had perpetrated fraud on both the Respondents and the court and whose application was manifestly bogus. That is not the situation here.

• It is averred the Respondents have had conduct of one of the most shameful  chapters in the history of South Wales Police after the Lynette White Cardiff 5 trial. It is accepted that the Claimant has become overtly suspicious of judges and lawyers, has been constrained to litigate in person because of the sheer enormity and costs implications of the task before him and has frequently used florid language in accusing judges, courts and the police of being in partnership against him. None of these factors should be held against him against the highly unusual and alarming circumstances of BS614159 and 1CF03361 which, if they had been visited on any  other single human being would have undoubtedly caused a reasonable onlooker, armed with the facts, to conclude all the Claimant’s claims were both meritorious and justified.

• The Claimant was a practising vet and highly respected, even employed by South Wales Police. He was a daredevil aviator but one whom the Civil Aviation Authority saw fit to allow to fly and participate (as recently as 2016) in Vintage Air Rallies. Notwithstanding representations by The Defendant that the Claimant brought prosecutions upon himself the Defendant managed to attempt to arrest, charge or prosecute him on no less than 33 occasions and each attempt was wholly without merit (BS614159). The Claimant invited a holistic approach, even pleading that 1CF03361 was the ‘end-game’ of BS614159. He was to be disappointed. The sheer volume of material before it persuaded the court there ought to be two trials and not one. His Honour Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC faced a daunting task but invited each incident to proceed as though in isolation of all the others permitting witnesses  each time to deny their knowing Maurice John Kirk so there was no ‘over-arching’ conspiracy to do him down. With the deepest of respect, that was not necessarily the realistic approach. On oath during the recent trial in 1CF03361 DC Stuart Davies accepted most police officers were certain to have heard of the famous flying vet, Maurice John Kirk. The statistical probability of 33 incidents all being pure accidents prompted Mr. Justice Jack to question the sheer volume as heposed the question  what is going on?    

• The Claimant does not accept the judgment in BS614159. Would any other person in his shoes? Does that make his applications to appeal without merit? Surely not. Matters progressed with 1CF03361. In that matter the Claimant’s case was that the case notes of Operation Chalice revealed South Wales Police resurrected the Claimant having a vintage aeroplane as BS614159’s trial date approached. They prosecuted his having a prohibited weapon with extreme prejudice. The timing was significant. Case notes purported to show officers conspicuously and suspiciously searching the Claimant’s legal papers in search of evidence of a gun sale 12 months in the past so as to preserve the integrity of the organisation. The Defendant denied the magistrates’ decision to grant the Claimant bail and procured his remand in custody for no less than eight months.

• Matters took a more sinister turn. On the 8^th June 2009 at Barry Police Station (the hub of all activity in BS614159) a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) set in motion a categorisation of the Claimant that was wholly unjustified. As someone who was MAPPA 3 he was now a danger to himself and others. A psychiatric report by a tame expert could have resulted in the Claimant being incarcerated in a mental institution for life. That tame expert’s report was contradicted over the years that followed by no less than five other psychiatric reports. What would the proverbial ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’ make of all this?

• Inevitably the Claimant was acquitted. This case was brought by the Claimant who invited the court to consider the following matters:

• Mr. Rydeard (Forensic Expert) accepted he had in his many years witnessed only a handful of collectors such as The Claimant prosecuted in this way. Why was he?

• Former Detective Superintendent McKenzie accepted he instigated MAPPA  so why did the court find he ‘mis-spoke’? Why was this admission ignored?

• If the ‘machine gun’ had been a real automatic why were Home Office ACPO Guidelines  against prosecution in the public interest not adhered to? Why did the court not allow the Claimant to rely on these as part of his case when they had both been pleaded and served in October 2020 by him?   

• Section 58 Firearms Act 1968 provided a statutory defence to the Claimant. There was no way of showing the Claimant as opposed to others modernised the exhibit. Three witnesses attested to the fact that the gun had been tampered with.

• The Defendant could provide no explanation as to why the gun appeared to go to Chepstow Forensic Science Services. Did the Police make the gun capable of firing? A crucial witness did not attend trial suspiciously yet his evidence was accepted by the court even though the Claimant challenged his evidence.

• Firearms expert Mr. Rydeard said ‘once a machine gun always a machine gun’. The exhibit could not be ‘down-graded’ by subsequent modification. When confronted by the Birmingham Proof House certification the exhibit was a ‘single shot gun’  both Mr. Rydeard and the court  leapt on the explanation Litts the Sportsman had a capacity to modify the gun when there was evidence this certainly was not the case.

• It is true the Claimant further feels aggrieved that his request for trial by jury was formally pleaded by him as long ago as 2011 and yet he was denied. He argued the Defendant be estopped from denying him his statutory right by dint of their pleaded response in their 2011 Defence. The Particulars of Claim were amended and a fresh Defence permitted. It was disingenuous to say that request was ten years old.

1. Of course any litigant in the Claimant’s position would seek to obtain redress. If these claims and applications were without merit  then why were they allowed to go to trial by senior judges exercising their court management powers? Why was the machine gun case kept alive for in excess of ten years? Why was the Defendant afforded the luxury of Leading Counsel at great public expense if all one was fronted with were the ramblings of an idiot?

1. Most disturbing of all, why was the Defendant’s continued conduct in having the Claimant incarcerated in recent years (again without merit see Exeter Rebecca Pow prosecution) permitted to prevail so that the Claimant was denied Relief from Sanctions when he was incarcerated and documentary evidence served on the court showed he had stolen all his case papers whilst in prison?

1. The Claimant renewed Leave to Appeal The Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey’s refusal to grant Relief from Sanctions and to allow the Claimant trial by jury. Great play is made of the observations of Tipples J on the 3^rd September. With the deepest of respect if, as claimed by the Learned Judge, the Claimant had failed to request an oral hearing why any hearing before Tipples J at all? Why did the Defendant file a document entitled Respondent’s skeleton Argument for Oral Permission Hearing 3^rd September 2021?  The Claimant will aver matters were not assisted by the fact his legal representative could neither hear not understand Tipples J because of technical difficulties.

1. In conclusion, if any ECRO is granted the court merely compounds the Claimant’s overall position that he was deprived of the right to call evidence, deprived a fair trial and all the indicia of bias he is told are but phantoms of his mind are, regrettably, fact.

David Jonathan Leathley

29^th September 2021

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/19588243.maurice-kirk-not-guilty-possession-knife-public/

Until such time when I find a proper judge will anything be done about the high level of crime within both the welsh judiciary and welsh penal system

Tomorrow morning in the machine gun case the QC for the South Wales Police will have ‘arranged’ that no more damaging evidence comes from his remaining witnesses

He will be allowed to oppose an adjournment for PC Brown and Foxy to give vital evidence on how my replica gun was hawked around the UK for over 2000 miles trying to get someone to certify it as a prohibited weapon when, already, RAF, Nottingham police and Chepstow Forensic Services certified the pieces of iron ware as scrap iron!

good morning,   MALICIOUS FAILED POLICE DISCLOSURE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwS1xvaeni8 https://youtu.be/jqjSLNm1Dyc Further to my text earlier today, asking for vast amounts of police deliberately failed relevant data to AGAIN be applied for in court tomorrow,  I am still unclear as to why ‘relief of sanctions’ blocked by judge Keiser et al now prevents any of this new incredible evidence heard this week not trigger more disclosure under CPR? The remarkable level of deceit by senior South Wales Police officers must trigger the obvious disclosure behind the reasons for such an unusual and extreme level of malice by Barbara Wilding and others , too many to mention here. Where is, for example, 21st June 2009 police ‘Operation Orchid’ disclosed data as it is not mentioned in any of the court files other than by me? Where are, for example, the senior police written orders for staff to carry out the criminal conspiracy, when meticulously recorded in personal police pocket note books and typed in MAPPA , OASys, PII, MG6C, Gold, Silver and Bronze officially kept Home Offices records. I never needed any civil claims like this or BS614159 and ten others for compensation had these records been originally disclosed. AND what about the hidden police investigation over the February 2009 fabricated Adrian Oliver (Dolmans) deliberately falsifed Chief Constable affidavit that sparked my eight months incarceration??? Operation Orchid , you will remember, was when police raided our home with armed helicopter and 20 plus many armed police streaming out of the undergrowth and with marked police cars all briefed to have our ten year old daughter, Genevieve, snatched by Vale of Glamorgan and Cardiff Social Services and for me to be shot, lining up outside our front gate with firearms. The English police forensic data is currently withheld with key officer Brown allegedly now ill as ARH1 was examined by them BEFORE the welsh ‘got their dirty paws’ all over it to squirreled it away for days to Chepstow FSS for you know what!  ‘Foxy’ must also give evidence, as ordered, with voice copy and transcript of her telephone conversations with my both then wife and me when pretending to buy a prohibited weapon Same for alleged Foxy voice heard in court this week. Both Kirstie and Genevieve had  ringside seats on the 21st June 09 raid, Operation Orchid THIS LIST IS FAR FROM EXHAUSTIVE  Maurice J Kirk BVSc   Tel 07708586202  www.kirkflyingvet.com mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com maurice@kirkflyingvet.com My other shy daughter, Belinda

The deliberate destruction of the highly revealing police officer’s bodycam was to bury the false South Wales Police data that was passed to PC Oliver Sevlik, on the roadside to obstruct the on going fascinating, even for me, machine gun damages claim in Cardiff’s County Court

Violently arresting M5 Motorway police part redacted witness statement

I am Police Constable 6878 SVETLIK of the Devon and Cornwall Police currently stationed at the HQ Roads Policing and Armed Response Hub. On Wednesday 2nd June 2021 at approx. 1330hrs I was on duty in full Police uniform in company with PC 7141 GREENSITT under callsign Y8ZE.

At that time we arrived near marker post 242.7 on the M5 Northbound to assist PC 8078 HINDSON who had located a male who had been reported to have been walking on the central reservation of the M5 motorway.

I had heard one of her radio transmissions before we arrived informing comms that the male would not co-operate with her and had been walking in the live lanes and that she needed assistance. On arrival I activated my body worn video serial number P15912 and found PC HINDSON speaking with an elderly and unkempt male who appeared to be trying to fill his car with diesel from a plastic fuel container which had no spout.

His vehicle was a red French registered Citroen C4 registration number towing a trailer. I asked him what he was doing and he informed me he was filling his vehicle with fuel. I informed him that running his vehicle fuel so low that it broke down on the motorway was very dangerous and could be considered as Careless Driving. He told me he had been in lane 3 at the last exit and due to the traffic had been unable to exit the motorway.

The male was very unsteady when he walked and I was concerned that he was unfit to drive the vehicle. I asked him if the vehicle was his but he would not answer me. I asked several times if he had a driving licence and insurance for the vehicle but again he would not answer me, then he stated he did have insurance but didn’t have it with him at the roadside.

 I asked his name but he would not provide it. He then went to the front nearside door of the vehicle and retrieved a large kitchen knife with a rainbow effect blade which he used to cut the top off a plastic bottle to use as a funnel for the fuel. He put the knife down and then returned to the fuel cap area. I asked why he had a knife in the car and he stated “TO CLEAN MY FINGERNAILS”. He continued wondering around the car unsteady on his feet and repeatedly refusing his details.

 As a result at 1336hrs I arrested him on suspicion of driving a motor vehicle on a road with no insurance and no driving licence and cautioned him using the “WHEN     RESTRICTED (when complete) MG11 Witness Statement Page 2 of 2 Continuation of Statement of Oliver James SVETLIK Signature: Oliver Svetlik Signature Witnessed by: N/A 05/2012 RESTRICTED (when complete) QUESTIONED” caution to which he made no significant reply. I applied my cuffs to the male’s right wrist as he had been in possession of a knife, had so far been unco-operative and would not provide me with his name so that I could risk assess transporting him without cuffs.

I tried to apply them in a rear stack but the male seemed to be inflexible and in some pain, so I re-applied them in the rear back to back position and checked them for fit and told him not to struggle against the cuffs or they may cause him discomfort.

I then put him in the rear of PC HINDSON’s vehicle. At 1349hrs I further arrested him on suspicion of possession of a sharply pointed/bladed article in a public place and reminded him he was under caution. On the male’s wrist was a hospital patient wristband from which I took the details of Maurice KIRK born 12/03/1945. When I spoke to the male and called him either Mr KIRK or Maurice he responded which tended to suggest this was his name but I was unable to confirm this. He still would not provide his home address.

He was then transferred to another vehicle and transported to Exeter Custody Suite by PC GREENSITT and PC 7830 KNIGHT. KIRK arrived at Exeter custody suite at 1400hrs and his detention was authorised.

 In custody he provided an address……….. However, he was also in possession of paperwork in the name of Kasper KIRK,,,,,,,,,,,,. When asked who Kasper KIRK was he replied “THAT’S FOR ME TO KNOW AND YOU TO FIND OUT”. On checking KIRK’s driving record he was showing as holding an Expired Substantive Licence.

South Wales Police Damages Claim – Batting Order

11/09/21
EnquiriesExeter Crown Court
R. v. Maurice John Kirk Case No T20210178

I write regarding the above prosecution concerning alleged unlawful possession of a knife and two motoring charges.

I have been served with a section 23A Notice of Withdrawal in respect of these charges by the CPS, and therefore take it that I am no longer required to attend the court in terms of the bail granted by the Magistrates Ct when transferring this case to the Crown Court.  I understand that this Withdrawal Notice has also been sent to the court.

I would therefore apply for a Costs Order in principle from Central Funds under section 16(2)(a)(a) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.

I therefore await a decision of the court as to whether I am to be awarded costs from central funds before sending any details of the costs incurred for consideration and assessment.  I would suggest that a hearing be fixed for consideration and determination of this cost application.

I will attend your 17th September 21 court to be paid the outstanding £4000 odd out of pocket expenses from the South Wales Police;s maliciously brought prosecution of stalking my very own conservative Taunton MP

The monies are needed to finance this Monday’s barrister, Mr David Leathley, in the linked 1CF03361 South Wales Police ‘machine gun’ malicious criminal conspiracy currently proving the level of deceit the SWP are prepared to stoop to in order to keep their pensions.
I await hearing from the court

Thankyou.

Maurice John Kirk
—
Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202  www.kirkflyingvet.com

mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

FOXY’s FALSIFIED FAIRY TALE

prosecutor’s summary of evidence seriously distorted with Foxy having a sex shange beteen 30th May 2009 and 26th January 2010

Andrew Huxtable proven as South Wales Police Liar for ‘Targeted Malice’

In the Cardiff County Court’s today’s 4th day of unlawfully restricted trial, while denied a jury, my inalienable right in so simple case of proven police malicious conduct, police HQ’s gun expert Andrew Huxtable looked visibly shocked, while on oath. on how I had ‘got my hands’ on his June 2010 Decommissioning Certificate issued by the Birmingham Proof House confirming ‘no work’,  what so ever, had been needed to be done on prosecution exhibit ARH1 after my obvious to be acquittal in February2010 Cardiff Crown Court.

Of course not, as the Nottingham police when, first obtaining my sold film prop imitation ‘ 1916 Battle of the Somme’ Lewis machine gun, had just come from the RAF and flown by myself at the 200 Farnborough Show as part of my replica DH2 biplane

  

earlier this week I was forced to make a private person’s arrest, NOT A ‘CITIZEN’S ARREST’ on the ring leader of the South Wales Police’s concocted targeted malice, retired Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie while asking him to quietly accompany me to to the nearest police station where I would, as usual, ;lay information.

Malice recorded in forty odd failed failed malicious criminal prosecutions, since the 1970s, had come to a head following my having flown my WW2 Burma War army 6a Auster aircraft through the roof of a Haverford Wes aerodrome police car.

Police had tried to obstruct our winter flight to Ireland for a a week-end of duck-shooting and attend the County Fermanagh Harrier Hunt Ball. Police had even resorted to having a Mk 7 Hawker Hunter fighter aircraft to be ‘scrambled’ from RAF Brawdy, near by, such was the inept unexplained welsh hatred of an Englishman repeatedly exposing their inherent deceit, found in some of those in their unique types of authority.

The learned judge’s ‘passing shot’ at the end of yet another day of welsh lies was if Huxtable had even travelled with PC Dodge to personally witness the complete contradiction of his sworn evidence , concerning the state of prosecution exhibit ARH1, why no armed police accompanied such a lethal prohibited weapon to Mr Rydiard, the gun expert at the Birmingham Proof house?

Apart from being contrary to Home Office regulations it transpired that Mr Huxtable’s filming of the film prop during the ‘strip down’, investigating senior police officers had quietly destroyed the incriminating evidence!

nothing new under the sun’ when the target of south wales Police routine nefarious criminal conduct.

In court tomorrow, 10thSeptember 2021, ex army Mr Rydiard will even produce his laboratory evidence that even the prosecution exhibit had no machine gun barrel as it was not side vented to cause rotation of the ammunition magazine and was a condemned barrel from a double choked 0.40 inch gauge squirrel garden gun.

Senior South Wales Police had even withheld Huxtable’s criminally belated January 2010 2nd witness statement upon the specific advice of their QC (quaintly corrupted), Mr Lloyd Jones and mastermind in this 30 years of evil, co defendant, Dolmans , solicitor, Adrian Oliver who are earmarked to be be arrested when they least expect it.

Huxtable’s 2nd 2010 statement had also been deliberately been withheld from their targeted victim and eight lady twelve man jury in Jan/Feb 2010 as Huxtable had unwisely, possibly, let it be known in police HQ that the machine gun ‘ammunition’, I had deliberately left on my office desk on top of my anticipated needed 64 page defence statement explaining all- rather like Sir Alec Guinness in ‘Seven Crowns for Seven Coronets film.

The targeted ‘machine gun’ malice had been hatched as far back as my 4th October 2008 letter to the police solicitors, corrupt Dolmans who, had this criminal conspiracy been in an English court of law, both co-defendants would have been before criminal and civil jury trials.

Instructions for my prosecuting barrister to include:

1. Demand Foxy give evidence.
2. Demand police officer, purported to be ill, give evidence
3. Demand English police’s, in Nottingham, forensic examination data,, created BEFORE the welsh put their slimy little mittens on the film prop imitation WW1 Lewis machine gun. be disclosed
4. Demand recall of Stuart McKenzie in the light of Huxtable lies implicating Dolmans fraud
5. Demand exhibit AH1 and AH2 and any others, deliberately withheld from the original Cardiff Crown Court jury, Huxtable rounds that rattled down the ARH1 gun barrel
6. Demand the Chepstow FSS (Forensic Science Services) and adjacent Army unit’s ARH1 records of their involvement with the purported De-Haviland Two dummy gun during the mysterious two days while it was off the audit trail the jury said, in the pub, had convinced them, so early on (se2cond day) in the daft Cardiff trial) orchestrated by barristers Ace and Richard Thomlow!
7. Demand the RAF paperwork created when RAF Lynham and RAF Farnborough had handed back the prosecution exhibit to a member of the general public, the first to an aircraft engineer and the second to me after meticulous scrutiny
8. Demand the coup de gras act of disclosure, protected using the Nuremburg excuse, when all pleaded, in being cross examined by my barrister, David Leathley Esq, their Gold , Silver and/or Bronze police HQ orders from more senior officers, including Barbara Wilding and MAPPA agents, including Dr Tegwyn Williams, now voluntarily deported to New Zealand, sacked chief South Wales Police forensic psychiatrist from Caswell clinic , the records of which were violently robbed from me by G4S run HMP Parc. This very relevant civil claim in Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre, on 13th September , G00TA220 Maurice v G4S Custodial Services, to be heard at the same time!!!!!!!!!!
9. Demand the obvious ‘trailing barrister; for ‘equality in arms’, Magpie, to attend the next day’s hearing at my expense
10. this list is not exhaustive

Incidentally,

TRIAL DAY ONE

1. The learned judge refused me the right to make notes of my thoughts while the barrister was leading me through the South Wales Police conspiracy in my ‘evidence in chief’

[ This appears to be contrary to my success before our Lord Chief Justice Burnett at the RCJ when case law was made allowing the mere mortals , like you and I, being now allowed to take notes while sitting in a public gallery of a criminal law court in england and Wales.

This had followed from HHJ Crowther’s threats of immediate prison if my then wife, Janet, did not stop writing my cross examination evidence, on oath, from another South Wales Police conspiracy following my being arrested for ‘entering a welsh prison without permission’].

Remember, this police conspiracy was in the drastic shadow of 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions brought by the same welsh police with my alleged ‘trading in machine guns’ jury civil trial being their desperate last ditch attempt, coup de gras, to block my 7th January 2010 listed 1BS614149 damages claim that would require at least 200 police officers as witnesses.

High Court, on 3rd September, denied me my inalienable right to having a jury despite a request in my Particulars of Claim filed with the Cardiff court in 2011

The police at the gate are searching for the2 ‘machine gun’–the senior police idiots, why not ask me and I would of told them exactly where it was in Lincolnshire

My time line written in Cardiff gaol for 8 months until acquitted and re arrested that same night, incidentally, having spent the evening in the Cardiff pub, called the HA HA, with some seven very ‘unsteady on their feet jury ladies and one jury man all now worn out with laughter

The police ‘plant’ on the jury , they had recognised, did not attend the party!

This police interview extract’. below, is an indication for the trial tomorrow should anyone wish to come along-I usually buy lunch for every one if time permits

MG at Secret police laboratory in Chepstow to tamper with the evidence, unblock the barrel of the dummy gun and paint it back to the colour when I owned it in order to fool the 2010 Cardiff crown court jury

‘Nothing new under the sun’ where South Wales Police criminality is concerned

Why is the Dummy Machine Gun found at Chepstow’s Forensic Services Laboratory?

1. On 7 April 2009 intelligence report of MJK holding gun in Aug 2008 photo

•  In March 2009 MJK attends magistrates and asks the court, having filed with it a copy of Dolmans, solicitors’ falsely drafted Chief Constable’s Feb 2009 sworn affidavit, to have the matter listed for an urgent private prosecution.

• On 30 May 2009 intelligence report MJK also attends South Wales Police HQ, Barry and Bridgend police stations to serve BS614159 witness summons on 40 odd police officers.

• With my same complaint left before magistrates, that Barbara Wilding’s affidavit was six weeks late and contrary to His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC’s November 2008 court order that there was to be full CPR disclosure in the current BS61419 one million pound plus damages claim.

• MJK arrest  was at 0810 hrs in Llantwit Major, on Mon 22nd June 2009

• Late same evening the ‘gun’ is handed over, on M5 Motorway, to unarmed Nigel Brown who returns with it to Bridgend HQ.

• Early Tuesday, 23 June 209 Nigel Brown takes dummy to A Huxtable at Bridgend’s police HQ where it is  stripped and photographed HO style

• OR Huxtable ‘ignores’ Home Office orders, he is to examine and film the ‘dummy gun’ but gets it to Chepstow’s Forensic Services

• Neither the 2010 jury nor MJK were told of this Chepstow examination by another forensic laboratory during the 2000-mile ‘hike’ of it around the UK

ALL WELCOME at the Cardiff civil justice centre and I BUY LUNCH AND REMEMBER, CARDIFF COUNTY COURT STAGES variety ACTS, LIKE MY BS614159 FARCICAL DAMAGES CLAIM, AS A BRIAN RIX WHITEHALL FARCE

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=brian+rix+farce+youtube&docid=607994148915450614&mid=13294E2DEA7C4622E82C13294E2DEA7C4622E82C&view=detail&FORM=VIRE

https://www.facebook.com/mauricejohnkirkflyingvet

 

Gross Abuse of Process

The cps man, Mr Rendle or Randle, played the  road incident’s nasty police man’s body cam  to himself while live in court in virtual mode, from some office in the UK, BUT neither magistrates nor I were aloud to see or HEAR it……a gross abuse of process which is why I said, “right I have heard enough of this nonsense and picked my papers, consisting of the days daily Telegraph and stomped out of court threatening to attend the 3rd September hearing when the ‘gloves will be off”

and so the South Wales Police perverse conduct continues unchecked

Written by an observer today

 MAURICE WALKS OUT OF COURT – Today at the 23 minute Exeter magistrates ct hearing the prevarications and dictates and railroading from the court, along with the total ignoring of Maurice’s explanations and requests, led to Maurice leaving the court during the hearing, and who could blame him?

Disclosure of the charges facts was denied to Maurice [CPS denied giving disclosure as it is believed it would “undermine their case”] – only a summary was available – which Maurice disputed. In other words: Maurice is disallowed the very details of the case[s] against him, even the police-worn body worn video camera footage is denied!!] and what he was arrested for.There were 3 charges:

1] “possession of a bladed article” [large kitchen knife] on 2 June on M5 motorway [CPS prosecuting “Chris Rendell said this was amenable for a summary trial] – the clerk then said the matter would be dealt with at magistrates court level, unless Maurice wished otherwise.

Maurice was then asked did he wish for the matter to be dealt with at magistrates and he declined stating “jury trial”. Maurice was asked time and again over the 23 minute hearing would he be getting a legal rep., which, ultimately, was left unanswered as the question of 2 years worth of costs regarding the case whereby he was a acquitted recently is still in limbo and not dealt with – completely unfair and possibly very illegal.

Legal types demand paying to represent one and hardly ever come at a reasonable and proper price – most accused defendants are not millionaires and legal reps. charge unearthly amounts and if someone in the halls of power decides theyre withholding the defendants costs for a recent case then paying expensive legal reps. at a later date [such as this case] is put in question.

All is carefully thought out by these public servants – and not always in the favour of citizens such as Maurice Kirk.Alarmingly, the 2nd + 3rd charges [“driving his car without a valid licence” and “valid insurance”]  have already been dropped, and   Maurice was asked how he would plea – he said he was unable to as,[with disclosure by the CPS being denied also]  he was “a little confused” as Taunton magistrates had already “quashed those charges” and, what’s more, “last year the police dropped those same charges” too.

The astonishing resurrecting of these 2 charges in this present court case surely shows something clearly wrong, and shows ultimately how far the prosecution will bend the rules regarding prosecuting someone when those very charges have been dropped BY 2 SEPARATE AUTHORITIES.

Regarding the charges Maurice stated he was never given a “producer” by the police on the 2 June [to produce his documents at a police station within the time period allotted] so it seems that, oddly, the CPS have re livened the “no licence + no insurance” charges after they already had been dropped merely  to bolster their “knife possession” case and help Maurice into jail yet again via another sentence. This obviously highly questionable adding of these 2 already deleted charges surely needs serious scrutiny into them by honest responsible parties.

South Wales Police instigated again, of course.

Taunton, a month ago……. my car is confiscated as my having ‘no driving licence’, later returned to me and told to drive away but the crowd of police refused to examine the kitchen knife I told them I had in my car!

I had told the Exeter Magistrates, to day, I had only returned to England at a cost of over £1000 just to plead if I was given a copy of the police body cam of the incident then I would know how to plead

I was refused as did the court refuse my tendered my defense statement explaining why I had good reason of having, not one but two kitchen knives in my vehicle.

Incidentally, having just won last month’s jury trial, brought by the South Wales Police concerning three charges, sending suspect anthrax and heroin from my Cardiff prison cell to Members of Parliament, it was of no surprise to be told my costs awarded, to cover £4000 out of pocket expenses, was a mere £237 because I had not asked for Legal Aid!!!!!!!!!!!

Now stopped by 17 police in routine police road check of vehicles they refused to examine the knives I was carrying in my car and told to drive away. Now work that one out!

The 3rd September, now there is a memorable date!

Ironic, post MP stalking acquittal?

TODAY’S EMAIL TO EXETER CROWN COURT

Maurice,Do you want to win up to £5,000 this month?We are giving you the opportunity to do just that, by launching our biggest super draw of the year so far – Our Annual Conservative Summer Draw.

ReplyForward

Meanwhile

Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>	11:03 (20 minutes ago)

I suspect fraud and ask for advice from Law society following the theft of my £5000 by the above purported Hatton Garden fronted money laundering  lawyer gang

This email was sent to the ‘money laundering’ department’ of the Law Society

Home

extract from today’s letter to Bristol County Court

Good morning,  I have spent more hours today on this following the recent judges order to re submit N244 application and fee.
I spoke to James, of payment dept,   just now reluctant to take my money as I have received, already, a sealed 25th July 2021 set aside receipt for hearing.
Last time at your court you made me pay £700 for a court fee that was, I said at the time, ultra vires and it took months to get my money back with multiple visits to the court  office with no apology
Exactly the same games I have experienced with 1Cf03361 (machine guns conspiracy) and T2020177 (Taunton MP conspiracy) etc CASES ALL FLOWING FROM SOUTH wALES pOLICE criminal conduct that successive courts and my Taunton MP deliberately ignore
Who in London in Operation Bridger and Operation Chalice is behind this decade of criminal conduct or do I have to join the devil worshipping brethren?

REPLY FROM LAW SOCIETY

Dear Maurice J Kirk,

Thank you for contacting The Law Society, the independent professional body for solicitors in England and Wales.

The Law Society cannot investigate complaints about its members and cannot become involved in individual cases or offer legal advice.

If you have complained to your solicitor about poor service and you are not satisfied with their response, you can contact the Legal Ombudsman on 0300 555 0333, or by visiting their website:

Make A Complaint | Legal Ombudsman

If you have complained to your solicitor about breaching the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct and you are not satisfied with their response, you can report them to the SRA on 0370 606 2555, or by visiting their website:

SRA | Reporting an individual or firm | Solicitors Regulation Authority

For further guidance on making a complaint about a solicitor, please refer to our website:

www.lawsociety.org.uk/public/for-public-visitors/using-a-solicitor/complain-about-a-solicitor

We trust that the above information has been helpful.

We value your feedback – take our quick survey

Kind regards,
Abid Rahman
Customer Services OfficerMembership ServicesThe Law Society113 Chancery Lane,London,WC2A 1PL
Tel: 020 7242 1222
www.lawsociety.org.ukGo green – keep it on screen​
This email and any attachment(s) is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use including further processing, for example; printing, forwarding, storage or copying is not allowed.
If you are not the intended recipient, please let the sender know as soon as possible and then delete all copies from your e-mail account.
Please note the sender is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Law Society by email.

ReplyForward

FAO HM Clerk of the Exeter Crown Court,

Please find enclosed my application to vary/strike-out a restraining order served on me on 20th may 2021 brought despite yet another acquittal requiring no defence.

It is almost a unique experience in being granted ‘costs’ by the presiding judge as in South Wales, over these past three decades,  only £200 was once mistakenly granted by a visiting judge but never released to me, of course. 

This protracted level of bullying by the welsh police covers well over forty failed malicious South Wales Police criminal prosecutions with my latest acquittals, ‘trading in machine guns’ police conspiracy  and now this similar South Wales Police concocted ‘Harassment of an MP’ conspiracy again proves that it is long overdue for an MP instigated HM Ministry of Justice public enquiry. 
—
Maurice J Kirk BVSc  

The Exeter Crown Court jury was denied any more South Wales Police gathered incriminating evidence to be disclosed (see prison officer’s witness statement below inadvertently slipped to me) which I suspect was a major factor in my obviously predicted acquittal.

Readers, may I suggest this another example of ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’, unpublished

Police ‘s further harassment of me, due to the acquittals, is my 1st July 2021 Exeter Magistrates hearing for ‘found in a public place with a bladed knife’ and driving without appropriate licence and insurance.

I always buy lunch

Costs appear to be running at around £8,000 whereas compensation from the Welsh authorities is circa, £200,000,

Maurice’s back garden

Today’s ridiculous information, I barely heard today and now on public world wide record, there needs to be an urgent public enquiry into the nefarious, nay, mendacious psyche of too many inherently deceitful South Wales Police, Cardiff & Park prison and court officers.

If ‘the rule of of law’ is to be upheld for our 1948’s Convention of Fundamental Freedoms and Human Rights’, contrary to war-monger Blair’s 1998 version who had deliberately expunged two paragraphs, then I may stop bleating on about the state of our antiquated law courts.

Maurice Kirk denies stalking Rebecca Pow at Exeter Crown Court | Somerset County Gazette

“Taffy was a welshman, Taffy was a thief, Taffy came to our house & stole a leg of beef“

Please note this particularly applies to a significant section of welshing ‘authorities’ who had gained great pleasure in coming to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in a minibus.

In 2002, out of shear spite, welsh police had gone to London to consistently lie on oath following their losing over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions.

The Chief Constable’s mandatory 10 year prison term machine gun conspiracy for me had been hatched by Barbara Wilding in 2008 but not before first handing in her notice to avoid loss of her lucrative state pension. My half dozen or so, compensation claims from police harassment, while I was peacefully trying to simply practice veterinary surgery, in the Vale of Glamorgan, triggered their Plan F or was it Plan ‘G’?

This was because my BS614159 etc civil claims had just been listed for January 2009 for 200 odd serving and retired police officers to be cross -examined by me.

My imminent 2009 civil damages claim trial clashed, by apparent coincidence, with the laughable ‘trading in machine guns’ jury trial, requiring no defense what so ever.

South Wales Police had frantically attempted playing their ‘Gulag card’ to have me locked away for life in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric prison using their rogue forenscic psychiatrist (soon sacked to South Island New Zealand) from the the notorious Caswell Clinic in Bridgend.

‘habits die hard’.

To help avoiding asking for Legal Aid I have reserved seats in the public gallery for a fee

My telephone number is 07708586202

All invited this week and I buy lunch/accommodation and flight home!

more, much more to follow

	20 Feb 2021, 15:12

TAUNTON CASE AS FARCICLE, NO DOUBT, AS THE REST IN NEXT WEEK

CPS (England) also refused a copy of my letter to Alun Cairns MP seeking help – YouTube

4th May 2021

FAO Avon and Somerset Constabulary

Dear Madam,

Another Gross Abuse of Process

I make formal complaint of South Wales Police perverting the course of justice , again, now trying to block my September 2021 jury civil trial for substantial damages , case number 1CF03361, following its collapsed ‘machine gun’ malicious criminal conspiracy while asking for my 10 year mandatory prison term. 

REMEMBER, the 43 failed South Wales Police prosecutions, case no BS614159 etc and then trying to use the seller and subsequent buyer of alleged  ‘prohibited weapon’ as prosecution witnesses after first having  unblocked the barrel and painting the heap of scrap iron a different colour to try and fool the jury. This latest gross  abuse of process comes to my family as no surprise whatsoever. 

1. 13/07/09 Pss 54886 instructions to police HQ’s Andrew Huxtable, to video exhibit ARH 1 replica film prop machine gun, has deliberately not been disclosed. Why?

 The firing mechanism had been purloined back in the 70s when I first visited the owner, Viv Bellamy, at Lands End aerodrome.

2. The contents of the stripping of exhibit was also not been disclosed nor explained to the jury as to why not.

3.A Huxley’s 4th Jan 2010 witness statement, written just days before my 2010 jury  trial, was also unlawfully withheld from the jury and me in 2010 as a deliberate act of perverting the course of justice when knowing the condemned smooth bore of the 0.410 garden gun barrel (prosecution exhibit ARH1) was simply a film prop for film, Gun-bus.

4. Even YOUR CPS TOLD ME BOTH WELSH PRISONS ARE NOW DENYING CONFISCATING MY LETTERS TO Alun Cairns MP and John Graham etc when the hurriedly prepared  9th April 2021 Prison officer Darrell Davies’s statement, only triggered by 3rd party intervention, late confirms the criminal conduct by Dolmans, police solicitors of Cardiff.

5 I wish to know, in writing, why the Welsh prisons lied in keeping no records of my letters, in and out of my cell, while I was a prisoner in Cardiff, Parc and Swansea prisons since 2005?

6. Can you obtain my stolen letter logs from Welsh prisons of my letters to MP?

7. As for my other stolen Welsh prison property, stolen by  G4S, relevant also to my Thursday Taunton and Friday Cardiff court hearings, can you obtain for me in time?

8. What is my current FTAC status and when did it change?

9. What is my current MAPPA status and when did it change?

10. Please name all the agencies and specific individuals linked by 2009 MAPPA level 3  welsh police station meetings to have section and locked away for life.  How I can I contact them for when we may next meet?

Thankyou

Ps please can I collect, today,  a cd copy of my 1st August 2009 police interview at HMP Parc re dropped charges?

Pps What was the makeshift glue, incidentally, found on my purported prison letters to MP?

Today, two years too late South Wales Police disclose it stopped many more of my prison mail from HMP Cardiff and G4S’ HMP Parc than previously admitted,

CPS (England) in the post to me today reveals the true level of deceit in the Welsh authority’s conspiracy in May/June 2019 , confiscating my mail without my knowledge, until now, to my doctor , family, courts and MPs there to help me in this 24/7 criminal conduct.

a sample of hidden evidence to disrupt my civil claims against the South Wales Police

‘Bad Character’ Scrutiny at Last!

I had the privilege of meeting Nick Hardwick Esq, then HM Inspector of Prisons, in HMP Swansea while I was serving an alleged ‘breach’ of a restraining order that I knew nothing about until I was arrested !

The rogue Caswell Clinic doctor, in Bridgend, South Wales, with wicked liar Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University , who had put the forensic psychiatrist ‘up to it’ in the first place, together had concocted a MAPPA3/3 report in order to have me locked away for life in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital if not ‘shot’ which was actually the case , in police Operation Challice. [see leaked MAPPA 3/3 leaked memos of Barry police station’s 8th June 2009clandestine cabal of corrupt crooked celtic coppers, once more.

By stating my ‘brain damage’ was so significant, causing PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder), in believing the welsh police were acting unlawfully, was all blamed on my having ditched in the Caribbean in my WW2 D-Day Piper cub and from being a ‘long term’ drinking partner of actor, and veterinary client, Oliver Reed Esq, it would prevent the Crown Court from allowing me to cross examine police witnesses.

This was not the first time I had witnessed the corrupt Celtic coppers collude in conspiracies to prevent the truth coming out before a jury and nor would it be the last.

I would win the scandalous allegation, the then ‘trading in prohibited weapons’ conspiracy led by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, as it had been hurriedly cobbled together to frustrate my damages claim resulting from my 40 odd acquittals proving malice aforethought.

War monger-er, Tony Blair’s almost first statute law passed by The House was the ill conceived 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act designed, in haste, liked the Dangerous Dogs and Hunting Acts to now leave so much misery within our country’s community.

My letters to both the blackmailed now sacked NHS (Wales) doctor and Alun Cairns MP were a reflection of a member of the public being a victim of the cruel state of South Wales’s Judiciary driven by greed and appearing answerable to no one and especially the ‘rule of law’ respected here in England.

Alas, my letters to Alun Cairns , for over a decade were to record for any future high profile HM Crown Court, is just what I want now, with alun, to indicate as to ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts.

Had Boris kept us in the EU for just a little longer, to get an orderly withdrawal, I was convinced serious needed reform would have occurred to our antiquated self servicing England and Wales penal code driven by avarice by those in positions of invincible prejudice.

For twelve years have been patiently waiting for the opportunity for an English court of law to examine the overwhelming evidence that I was never served a’ restraining order’ before it was breached but instead, I have uncovered a level of deceit and intrigue beyond imagination practiced daily in the Wales law courts.                                                                                                                                        

P Crean Esq,                                                                                                                   T20200177

Cardiff Crown Court                                                                                                       T20097445

Wales

6^th April 2021                                                                                       Your ref T20170239

Dear Sir,

FICTITIOUS SERVED RESTRAINING ORDERS

1. I repeat my application to have ‘varied’ outstanding purported restraining orders in my name

• I asked for D Leathley Esq, Barrister at Law, to represent me in Cardiff Magistrates but he was refused even sight of the court files, in open court, of my 1^st Dec 2011 and later purported varied ‘restraining, as the court records had been found to be unlawfully tampered with.

• On 9^th April 2021, before an Exeter Crown Court judge, I will be asking His Honour to study, initially, my numerous witnesses accounts, including those from HM Crown Prosecution Service officers and eye witnesses from the public galleries, confirming that I was neither in court each time and nor did I know about their content until I was arrested and gaoled.

• I will be applying for all relevant welsh disclosure of court documents at the hearing unless they can be released to me, by email, before Friday, please? I have copies of forgeries in files.

• If you indicate I was ‘served’ correctly please, when, where and by whom and who were present as witnesses at the time?

‘Above is an extract of the transcript from the secret 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, held in my forced absence, whilst unrepresented, fabricated from the start that I was ‘dangerous’.

However, just in time for my future jury trials but only by a cock-up in Cardiff’s County Court, caused explanation of the Dr xxxxxxxxxx, sacked Caswell Clinic forensic psychiatrist, stating I was mentally ill at the time, so as to stop the already doomed ‘machine-gun ‘jury trial carrying, of course, the mandatory prison trerm of ten years.

Only by January 2021 did I discover the full extent of South Wales Police’s criminal conspiracy while I was in Cardiff prison’s F block just days before the comical machine gun trial.

Huxtable had been told to hide the HM Home Office mandatory video he took in SWP HQ, in Bridgend, of his ‘[sripping down’ the ‘gun’ knowing it was not a ‘prohibited weapon’at all.

‘Inherent deceit’ and ‘cheating on the rugby field’ is little of what I personally witnessed in my informative years at Taunton School and why my mother,from a direct line of Captain Morgan, cried so much when she heard I had bought a veterinary practice in the Vale of Glamorgan.

This document was withheld from me and the jury

This document was also withheld from me and the jury revealing the ‘gun’ was never a ‘prohibited weapon’

is to be called for May 2021 jury trial as both my ‘character’ and ‘defence’ witness in the current criminal and civil proceedings (1CF03361) emanating from the South Wales Police’s criminal conspiracy revealed in T20097445 ‘trading in machine guns’ Crown Court fiasco will expose.

•  There I was acquitted, without need of a defence, as the police only revealed this year the ‘prohibited weapon’ was a film prop replica WW1 Lewis machine gun certified by Birmingham Proof House as a single shot 0.410 condemned gardening gun!  All to disrupt my compensation following 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions by withholding Huxtable’s 4^th Jan10 witness statement stating even the barrel was too wide to retain even rim fire o.303 rounds!

• So desperate were the South Wales Police, at trial, it had both unblocked the unrifled barrel and had painted the exhibit ARH1 a completely different colour to when I had owned it in order to try and fool the jury. This whole matter now needs a police investigation from England

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

No wonder the South Wales Police were examining each and every sealed and unsealed letter of mine from HMP Park and HMP Cardiff

Andy, please do not leave Avon & Somerset Police on my account

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-56661721

In The Criminal Court of Appeal                                           RCJ case no. 201704259B4      

Royal Courts of Justice,                                                   Machine-gun claim 1CF03361

Cardiff Crown &                                                    25 yrs police harassment BS614159+

County Courts                                                                                   (Cdf cabal’s cover-ups) 

 Wales UK                                 [The hatred of the English is palpable]                       

                                                                                                                               19^th May 2018

FAO Clerks of the above UK Law Courts,                                                         

South Wales Police failure to disclose evidence is routine & deliberate

“If you don’t want the defence to see it, then it goes onto MG6D” a list of sensitive unused material which the defence doesn’t have access to”. Police “have been trained to put items on there (MG6D) that they do not want disclosed to the defence”Quote from Cdf Chief Inspector

The Times, Centre for Criminal Appeals (CCA)’s, Cardiff Law School’s ‘Innocence’ project, Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate’s & Inspectorate of Constabulary’s dossiers, re ‘police disclosure evidence’, were all submitted to London’s HM Justice Select Committee 

“Officers put undermining material on the MG6D list to hide it”

These are just a few of the undisclosed facts, themselves hidden but now ‘surfaced’ following a Freedom of Information Act application, in relation to an ongoing investigation in Cardiff.

Suzanne Gower, solicitor and Managing Director at the CCA said, “These documents show why the responsibility for providing full and fair disclosure must be taken out of the hands of police and prosecutors. The truth is they see themselves first and foremost as adversaries to the defence and in some cases, deliberately withhold exculpatory evidence”.

The South Wales Police have lost over 50 malicious prosecutions against one victim, with 89% of its first 113 allegations struck out by 2004. Subsequent prosecutions, of greater concoction, needed ‘machine-guns’ and ‘radio isotopes’ injected into their victim’s brain for a MAPPA level3 category3 for Ashworth high security psychiatric prison eligibility, for life.

Their 1993 victim had naively employed lawyers for an obvious ‘an out of court’ settlement scenario but Cardiff’s cabal refused to even ‘negotiate’ cut & dried facts! Their tax payer funded ‘gravy train’, with all it’s unchecked money from point of ‘arrest’ to ‘deals’ tonight in prison, was just too good to be true. Our Welsh judiciary’s real purpose is as a huge money-making commercial enterprise. This rampant fraud is not investigated so those in positions of privilege can continue abusing their MAPPA so called ‘authority’ to keep bullying victims.

Cardiff Crown Court Protocol to Remove/Vary a Restraining Order

1. Why is ‘protocol’ riddled with court directions this Applicant has already been denied? 
2. Is current ‘protocol’ as in 2012 1^st trial & since machine-gun conspiracy hatched in 2008?
3. 1(e)  Request previous Dr Tegwyn Williams’ statements repeatedly refused him by CPS
4. 2(a) Request court log records copy in 4(5) ‘restraining order’ trials & Cardiff magistrates 1^st Dec 2011 ‘harassment’ conviction , before & after ‘re-written’, redacted or destroyed 
5.  Why was ‘harassment’ conviction exhibit ‘switched’ and court records falsified, thrice? 
6. 2(c) Request copy of a law enforcement competent to obtain Dr Williams’ & Dr Hillier’s statements re 1^st March12 ‘harassment appeal’ & why 2^nd ‘breach’ ‘arson’ trial stopped?  
7. 2(d) Request copy of cited ‘Sentencing Guidelines’ (not in court letter) as needed for Applicant’s 1(c) statement of ‘better particulars’ in these 25 years of  deliberate injustice     
8. 2(e) What’s the purported past & current relationship between Applicant & Dr Williams?        
9. 3(b) Request CPS ‘case papers’ of the 2011’ Cardiff chaotic ‘harassment’ conviction and as to ‘where, when and by whom’ purported ‘retraining orders’ were drafted & ‘served’?
10. Will it include guard’s & court clerk’s (hiding in cell) ‘notes’ of 1^st ‘service’, in corridor on crutches while surrounded by 4 armed MAPPA guards or 2^nd ‘service’ in victim’s cell or 3^rd ‘service’ at ‘gate arrest’ (6 witnesses again)? Judge Curran refused any disclosure
11. Will 5th jury see lovely Inspector Lucas’ 4^th RO ‘service’ warning re hidden ‘restraining order’ or her 5^th’service’? [She recorded Dr TW/m-gun complaint, all ‘buried’ of course].
12.  3(d) Why were Applicant’s antecedents still wrong for 14^th Dec17 ‘sentencing’ hearing?
13. Why then, was he MAPPA registered or again registered and not informed and not now?  
14. Why ‘varied’, by whom and with whom, from its 2008 inception, if not to be vindictive?
15. Why again false antecedents if not to block his release to progress his civil police claims?

Why did ‘sentencing’ judge have ‘no authority’ to direct that GMC be notified of fraud?

Why do police refuse disclosure via his lawyers and Criminal Cases Review Commission? Why for 3^rd time court has asked and allowing his letters and complaints, in past 25 years, be ignored if not complicit? Disclosure of this relevant evidence will avoid need of a 5^th jury trial

Why1^st jury refused jury notes data for a court then deny existed? Leverson LJ & Melling J, at RCJ appeal, were deliberately lied to (see transcripts & The Sun article), why?

  Why is Applicant still denied MAPPA ‘minutes’ of machine-gun meetings to kill him?

This level of hypocrisy means ‘the rule of law’ is replaced by ‘political expediency’ under the legitimacy of its unusual MAPPA & Freemasonry devil worship, so who will be next?

When did court have this ‘protocol’ typed for ‘striking out’ or ‘varying’ a restraining order? 

Who’s explaining ‘variation’, when, where and by who served, to allow web site publication?

Why does HM Crown Prosecution Service refuse CD data release, concocted for his 1^st 2^nd 3^rd 4^th and 5^th ‘breach of a restraining order’ jury trials, while Legal Aid prisoners here are ‘in possession’ of theirs? Why did magistrates refuse his lawyer’s the right to apply for legal aid?    

HM Prison Wales is where the young leave in a far worse shape, to respect society, than when first entered. Which bureaucratic ‘back-hander’ ensured this Buntlines holiday camp mentality, if not to fuel the judicial ‘gravy train’? None available to ‘privately funded’ victims

Why does NHS (Wales) withhold Professor Rodger Wood’s deceitful Caswell Clinic ‘brain damage’ report? Did it fool Dr Williams enough to concoct his Applicant’s 19^th Oct medical report? Is this why, in secret 2^nd Dec court, no machine-gun ‘strike out’ but all MAPPA was? 

Did Dr T W ever state the Applicant was a ‘risk’ to the general public? No. The only ‘risk’ was to the Chief Constable if he pursued his 50 police failed malicious prosecution claims, including the Caswell clinic ‘break-in’(for corrected medical reports). Why machine-gun trial not stopped when Barbara Wilding had it re-painted to fool jury using transvestite, ‘Foxy’ & after victim was imprisoned for days on pretext he was ‘unidentifiable’ by clients?

Cardiff refuses to process his 50 police failed prosecutions, machine-gun & Caswell ‘break-in’ damage claims and at 7.42 a 4^th May ‘court order’ was put under cell door, post stamped 10^th, making it 27 hrs too late to appeal. Judge had refused any progress until next year on all! 

Are conditions this bad across the Severn Bridge where lying, at least, is not taught in school?

These 40 odd questions are hopefully the basis for a ‘Noddy Land’ children’s book best seller

Yours faithfully,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                                                Cc The Secretary of State for Wales HMP Park.                                     You Tube                        Association of McKenzie Friends                                                                                                                                                            Bridgend.                                        mauricejohnkirk.com                RCVS GMC, CCRC, HMCPS

I am currently deep in the middle of a South Wales Police criminal conspiracy, an experience lasting almost three decades, that makes the words set out below simply a fanciful fairy tale but alas, it is at the heart of a far more serious case in England, right now!

As usual for those who attend this week I buy the substantive ‘lunch’!

https://mauricejohnkirk.com/2020/02/01/parc-prison-stopped-letters-medication/

Friday’s T20200177 hearing re failed HM Prosecution Service Disclosure

Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>	14:44 (1 minute ago)
to South, Enquiries, Celia, butlincat, Alun, bcc: me

1.  I am even being refused electronic copies of the evidence in the case from lawyers in order I may instruct a solicitor and barrister so there is little chance of my getting it off you, is there?

2.  I, of course, refer also to the prosecution’s deliberate withholding of its alleged ‘ ‘unused ‘ material you relied upon in the other charges now dropped but were maliciously used, at the time, to have me locked up in Cardiff, HMP Parc and Exeter gaols for almost a year unconvicted.

3.  Remember, you are also reliant on the South Wales Police having also fabricated I had criminal convictions of ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’ to make sure  all prison staff know

4.  But you will not even disclose the evidence in the case to me, in electronic form, as it would not just undermine another lucrative police advantage, you have over your victims, it would also be bad in appearing to ‘level the playing field’ of this far outdated England & Wales judicial system

—

Maurice J Kirk BVSc  

Tel 07708586202                                 

www.kirkflyingvet.com

mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

THE POLICE CONSTABLE’S oath of attestation as follows: “I do solemnly and sincerely declare and
affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity,
diligence and impartiality; upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all
people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and
prevent all offences against people and property, and that while I continue to hold the said office I
will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.

Once bound by this oath, Section 50 of the same act binds officers to regulations set by the
Secretary of State. One set of these are the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2008, which contain a
schedule of behaviours to which officers must adhere to.
These behaviours include:

Honesty and Integrity: Police Officers are honest, act with integrity and do not compromise or abuse
their position.

Orders and Instructions: Police officers only give and carry out lawful orders and instructions.
Discreditable Conduct: Police officers behave in a manner which does not discredit the police service
or undermine public confidence in it, whether on or off duty.

Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct: Police officers report, challenge or take action
against the conduct of colleagues which has fallen below the standards of professional behaviour.
Ministers are bound, as another type of public office holder, in much the same way, by the
Ministerial Code 2010.

Under Common Law, if a public officer wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification
neglects to perform any duty they are bound to perform, by Common Law or Statute, then they are
guilty of the offence of misconduct in a public office.

The elements of this offence are that:

a) public officer was acting as such
b) wilfully neglected to perform their duty and/or
c) wilfully misconducted themselves in a way which amounted to an abuse of the public’s trust
in the office holder
d) without reasonable excuse or justification

The misconduct is not restricted to dishonesty, bribery or corruption but must injure the public
interest and call for condemnation and punishment. For example in the case of R v Dynham [1979] a police officer watched a man being beaten but did not intervene; the officer was convicted.

A further Common Law offence is called Perverting the Course of Justice and is committed where a
person embarks on a course of conduct, which has a tendency to, and was intended to, pervert the
course of public justice. The ways in which this can be committed include; concealing offences,
assisting others to evade arrest and failing to prosecute.

The Police Act 1996 once again makes a further provision of note, in Section 89(2). It states that any
person who resists or wilfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting
a constable in the execution of his duty, shall be guilty of an offence. And another in Section 30,
which defines the jurisdiction of a Constable as: “throughout England and Wales and the adjacent
United Kingdom waters”.

So, in summary: The rules are that I must act; that if I don’t I break the law.

https://www.patriot-campaigns.uk/video_britain_first_exposes_migrant_hotel_in_leeds?utm_campaign=hotel_leeds1&utm_medium=email&utm_source=britainfirst

VIDEO: Britain First EXPOSES migrant hotel in Leeds! PS: If you enjoyed this video and want to see more street activism videos, consider giving a small one-time donation to help power and fuel our activities, demonstrations and recruitment drives. We cannot do this alone, we need our supporters to provide the resources so we can get out on the streets and take our country back! Our brave activists are depending on you: www.patriot-campaigns.uk

HM Clerk of the Exeter Court                                                                     Case no T2020177

31^st March 2021

Dear Sir/Madam,

9^th April 2021 Costs Hearing

The Trial judge will sit on a case management hearing on 9th April 21 and has allocated only one hour when it requires at least half a day, if not a whole one with police in attendance concerning the SWP perverting the course of justice.

My outstanding applications include disclosure requests o

my four prisoner letter logs retained in Exeter, Cardiff and Parc and Swansea prisons copies of which were supplied to HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) and some to CPS (England) to cause the recent dropped charges.

my MG6D SWP unlawfully withheld data for 28 years, CPS & police data as evidence, if disclosed under CPR, would have ‘undermined’ almost all their criminal allegations 89% of which were quashed when standing at 113 in all

my FTAC logs confirm I am ‘no risk’ to stop my cross examination of Asher.

my MAPPA logs that record that I am of ‘good character’ hence requiring the police doctor giving evidence in support and also requires a witness summons

my OASYsis logs the SWP had deliberately falsified to cause years of delay in my release before HM Parole Board when parole office identified ‘no risk’.

my confiscated South Wales Police defence data as the Claimant in ten plus civil claims, alone, would quash criminal proceedings.

The return of my Volvo car containing vital evidence for current proceedings

I yet again apply for G4S to return my 1st Nov 2019 property brutally robbed from me during my violent exit from HMP Parc. My personalty included my new wheelchair, my comprehensive medical records from Caswell Clinic and NHS (Wales) secure psychiatric hospital delivered to the prison by Dr Gaynor Jones, my legal papers including my MP letter log, cases BS614159 (40 plus failed SWP malicious criminal prosecutions, currently at the RCJ and Cardiff barrister’s chambers, 1CF03361 (SWP ‘trading in machine guns’ failed malicious criminal prosecution) currently before a quasi-Cardiff county court.  

 And witness summonses to attend with relevant records, if not disclosed before, are Cardiff & Parc HM Governors, Alun Cairns MP & B Hughes, probation officer, to confirm my SWP faked convictions, included ‘firearms’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘child abuse’. A liaison officer was seen stealing, twice, my legal papers from my cell is required. 

AND to again argue re ‘bad character’, banning me from cross examining prosecution witnesses again resulted from Dr TW’s testimony written, is a joke, when it was he that was mentally ill. He said I suffer from irreversible ‘significant brain damage’ and PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disclosure) in my misconceived belief that I am being ‘stalked’ by the South Wales Police,” no, perish the thought”!

My restraining order and ‘bad character’ convictions are now in serious doubt due to

 the T20097445 trial prosecution exhibitARH1, labelled for the jury as ‘Lewis machine gun ‘, was far from the truth. My ‘possession’, which had me MAPPA 3/3 registered, as contrary to1968 Firearms Act, was nothing more than an unserviceable 0.410 single shot ‘garden gun’ for rats and tree rats! Inspection by Huxtable (see his 4^th Jan 2010 witness statement, deliberately withheld from both me and the jury) recorded the non-rifled barrel was condemned and too wide a bore to fire either a 0.303 or US 0.300 round.

Andrew Huxtable at SWP HQ, on 23rd June 09, knew this when that nigh the Nottinghamshire police confirmed the exhibit was NOT a ‘gun’ and confirmed when he ‘stripped it down’ and videoed it. Also, my speaking directly to Birmingham Proof House, after my acquittal, it was confirmed there were no ‘machine gun’ parts found inside the ‘Gunbus’ film prop WW1 replica! 

I have already instructed and paid, in advance, a London QC and law firm of solicitors, specialising in malicious criminal prosecutions, which is another reason why the South Wales Police lied to CPS (England) over the malicious criminal prosecutions that had me gaoled in Exeter prison last year to further frustrate my right of civil redress in ten or so civil claims.

My May 2019 Alun Cairns MP letter from Cardiff prison, staff told me, was stuffed with a ‘bag of white powder’ believed to be heroin while my white powder contaminated letter, to John Graham, contained possible anthrax.

The SWP forensic psychiatrist, who applied at 2^nd Dec 2009 secret Cardiff Crown court in my absence, that I should be locked away for life as ‘very dangerous, due to ‘significant brain damage’ while blaming Professor Rodger Wood’s similarly daft medical reports upon which ‘he relied’, flagrant liar, said my frontal brain damage was from my ‘ditching in the Caribbean in my D-Day 1944 Piper cub and for having been a too long a term drinking partner of my veterinary client and actor, Oliver Reed Esq.

If there is still doubt in the trial judge’s mind that I am not ‘fit’ to cross examine the culprit in this nonsense then I invite His Honour to cause disclosure as to why ‘vulnerable’? My £20,000 plus paid for court transcripts confirm I am ‘no risk’ to anyone but the deceitful % found over Offa’s Dyke.

Yours

Maurice J Kirk BVSc     maurice@kirkflyingvet.com http://www.mauricejohnkirk.com

(I offer below witnesses £1000 each to come forward)

My telephone number is 07708586202 & Email maurice@kirkflyingvet.com if you can assist. please, in establishing why I am blocked from communicating with anyone in the Conservative Party’s administration?

When I was a member of the Welsh Conservative Party, while working as a veterinary surgeon in the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP’s predecessors, such as John Smith MP and Walter Sweeney MP, spent much time with me and both had invited me for tea in the House, overlooking the river Thames. The subjects talked about always included the same old matter of South Wales Police bullying following their latest malicious criminal convictions failure.

In the early 2000s I did a ‘scalp’ count:

Of the last 113 criminal allegations levelled at me I had won 89% of them and that was without either a lawyer and little, if any, independent defence witnesses not frightened by their local South Wales Police’s notorious reputation not having to answer to anyone for its persistent lying and other nefarious conduct.

Seven times, for example, I was stopped on the roads around Barry to produce my driving documents and seven times I had refused as, identifying the name of my insurance company invariably led to a visit to the brokers’ offices by the ‘men in blue’ only for the boss to ring and suggest I move my cover to another company.

This was the same tactic in Guernsey, of course, after the Taunton police, following my acquittal of ‘theft’, again requiring no defence, having ‘put the boot in’ over their ‘missing’ Chief Superintendent’s personal pocket note book borrowed from his office in order to gain my decisive ‘acquittal over their latest bizarre tantrum

I was accused of a firearms offence with an old worn out 18 century flintlock that caused ‘the biggest man hunt’ Taunton had ever known, the court heard. Anything to stop me from practicing veterinary surgery.

Exeter Crown Court

28^th March 2021

Dear Sir/Madam,

DRAFT

Mr Robin Shellard of Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, tomorrow, will be asked to prove I ever knew or should have known about the Cardiff magistrates court 1st December 2011 ‘restraining order’ before it was allegedly ‘breached.

The R/O was mischievously designed to cover-up Caswell Clinic’s psychiatrist having been blackmailed by South Wales Police to fabricate his 19th Oct 2009 quite unqualified medical report of me that I suffer PDD (paranoid delusional disorder), in the belief I am being persecuted by the South Wales Police and that I have ‘significant’ and irreversible brain damages and so registered MAPPA 3/3 and should be locked away for life, without a trial, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.

• Mr Robin Shellard tomorrow, will be asked to produce documentary proof as to when, where and by whom, with five witnesses present, did I get served this purported 1st December 2011restraining order?

• Mr Shellard , tomorrow, will be asked to produce a statement that prison officer Lea-Barker was present when he or another tried to stuff my discharge custody papers down my left sock as I I was being dragged the length of the floor out of the Cardiff magistrates custody suite, without my crutches, after 5pm.

• Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will also be asked to show proof I ever knew or should have known about someone from a later Cardiff court having ‘handed me’ a ‘variation’ to that original ‘restraining order and when, where and by whom was it to finally supply me with a certified true copy also for HM Recorder of Exeter?

• Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will also be asked to confirm, again by documentation, that I had then been immediately ‘gate arrested’, on 1st December 2011 by the South Wales Police, within the court building but no ‘restraining order’ was then given to me or found about my person.

• Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will also be asked to confirm, in the custody records, following my then overnight Tottenham police station stay before release from Haringey Corner magistrates with a £50 fine I still refuse to pay, that there is no record of any ‘restraining order’ relating to the rogue sacked ‘deported ‘ to New Zealand Caswell Clinic police psychiatrist ever found by the Met police either.

• Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will be also asked to confirm his colleague, barrister Chris Smythe, had even taken the trouble, with my barrister, David Leathley Esq, to try and examine the court records from both Cardiff Crown Magistrate’s court files but were both refused access.  It stinks does it not?

• Both were lawyers refused as I had already been into the court building in disguise and ‘got away’ with photocopies of court record displaying they had been ‘tampered with’ (deliberately falsified) once I had arrested the original HM Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans, who is another eye witness to the truth.

1. The CPS barrister therefore was forced to give evidence in Bristol Crown Court that he was also a witness that I could never have been ‘served’ the 1st December 2011 restraining order before I had, unknowingly, breached the purported district magistrate John Charles hand written order created, incidentally, between CPS and him in my absence!

1. Restraining orders are still unlawfully in place, 10 years later, in order to prevent my obtaining relevant disclosure and applying for my 19th October 2009 seriously damaging Dr TW unqualified psychiatric report being corrected or getting the original prosecutor to repeat his Bristol Crown Court evidence, years ago, before His Honour Judge Johnson tomorrow as it would wipe out 5 years of my false imprisonments.

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Blatant Liars Throughout Trial

EXTRACT from 8^th Feb 2010 concocted Machine Gun jury trial

Summing -up by Judge Paul Thomas

“Andrew Huxtable of the national ballistic services, again attached to the South Wales Police at Bridgend, he, for five and a half years was with the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers before his present role. He researched the weapon on the internet. He said that the weapon appeared to be built or made around 1911, was from a light machine gun, that’s to say a Lewis gun is a light machine gun, American design, gas operated, and the gases operate the piston to drive to the rear, against the spring. He gave other technical details of the mechanism, which, I confess, I didn’t follow, but perhaps have little significance to this. Again a matter for you. I can remind you of them, if you wish me to, in due course. He says that a .303 calibre ammunition would be fed into

Page 89 of 94

 a gun, the gun by a feed arm from the magazine, and he says that when he looked at this Exhibit 1, there were components missing which would have allowed the gun to fire automatically”.

TRANSCRIPT OF 8th FEB 10 TO WITNESS THE LYING I ROUTINELY WITNESS IN WELSH COURTS

FAO

Exeter Crown Court 28^th March 2021 hearing before HM Recorder of Exeter

Devon,

England

26^th March 2021

Maurice Kirk’s Complaint re Dr TW for Deliberately Falsifying His Victim’s MAPPA Level 3 Records to Inflict Maximum Harm

I now wish to explore the possibility of criminal prosecutions against the perpetrators, indeed, a criminal investigation into his repeated decisions.

Suggestions and recommendations to include:

1.    Call for a criminal forensic investigation into Dr T Ws’ conduct.

2.    Cease and desist the use of the failed 2003 Maurice Kirk Vexatious Court Precedent until further notice.

3.    Instruct the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice that without any clear Legal Definition of both VEXATIOUS and HARASSMENT that there be no more Vexatious and Harassment appeals/cases should navigate UK Court and Tribunals.

4.    Call for an outside police investigation into the conduct of the South Wales Police

5.    Immediately instruct the ICO to remove their VEXATIOUS guidelines from their website

I would argue that Dr T Ws’ decision caused numerous MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS and he has labelled me as MAPPA level 3 Category 3 most dangerous which at best, is a stigma upon my reputation and at worst libellous that leads to incessant harassment by other police forces with loss of my liberty.

 I consider that the emphasis should be on an objective standard and that the starting point is that alleged harassment primarily involves making a request which has reasonable foundation, that is, reasonable foundation for thinking that the information

sought to be simply corrected by a single Exeter Crown Court judge would be of value to me and be in the interest of the general public to the public or any section of the public

How many other people’s lives has this psychiatrist ruined by not correcting his reports?

—

Maurice J Kirk BVSc  

Tel 07708586202                                 

www.kirkflyingvet.com

mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Dr T W facilitating MAPPA, as from 8 June 2009 before he was Cardiff court ordered to provide a Psychiatric Report implies or is consistent with that early on Dr TW was a major player in the “maliciously orchestrated deceit” to stop my BS 614159 +2 (40 odd failed South Wales Police malicious criminal prosecutions) civil claims for damages.

HM Clerk of the Court

Exeter’s 29^th March 2021 HM Crown Court case no T20200177

25^th January 2021

Dear Sir/Madam,

Yet another South Wales Police Malicious Criminal Prosecution

1. South Wales Police’s conspiracies include a failed ‘trading in machine guns’ malicious criminal prosecution, a failed MAPPA 3/3 registration from failed Caswell Clinic fabricated forensic evidence that I have ‘irreversible significant brain damage’ and forty odd other failed malicious criminal prosecutions many emanating from the now sacked police blackmailed forensic psychiatrist, T W , who applied and failed, at a secret Cardiff Crown Court, that I should be incarcerated, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.

• All concocted in order to frustrate my 1CF003361 and BS614159 plus 10 civil damages claims.

• The 44^th welsh conspiracy is destined, it appears, most likely to terminate with HM Crown Prosecution Service in believing the South Wales Police would release my stolen property from G4S. at HMP Parc and disclose my prison letter logs from HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc that would reveal a tissue of lies surrounding this current remaining indictment.
• POLICE WITHHELD WITNESS STATEMENT

• Only this year the South Wales Police inadvertently disclosed to me the highly contentious 4^th January 2010 police HQ’s Andrew Huxtable witness statement which is why it was deliberately withheld from both me and the jury, during the 28^th January 2010 comical Cardiff Crown Court hearing, as its facts reveal, alongside his being cross examined, his flagrant perjury that the investigating senior police officers, such witness yet to be heard, Detective Inspect o Rebecca Hughes, sitting in the back of the court, would you believe!

HUXTABLE IGNORES HOME OFFICE REGULATION TO VIDEO ‘STRIPPING DOWN’ THE ‘GUN’

• The 4^th Jann 2010 Huxtable hidden MG 11 witness statement disclosed the police exhibit ARH1 was NOT a WW1 Lewis machine gun in my ‘possession’ at all  as he had written in his 23^rd June 2009 witness statement  but a condemned 0.410 shot gun barrel screwed to a piece of old wood, as film prop, to look like a gun in WW1 depicting the 1916 Battle of the Somme!

CROSS EXAMINATION OF HUXTABLE REVEALS THE PROSECUTION FLAGRANT DISHONESTY

Of course, HUXTABLE’S curiosity, for nearly two hours, ‘stripped down’ the ‘gun’ to find the case was devoid of machine gun parts to go on to ‘pervert the course of justice’

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1458160297580939&set=picfp.100001609497337

GREAT NEWS!

Yesterday I traced yet another eye witness who was in my1st December 2011 Cardiff magistrates court room to confirm no restraining order was ‘handed down’ by District Judge John Charles to me as I was in the cells. The only document the district judge had was his part hand written one, using blue ink, as draft to ‘beef -up’ prosecution barrister David Gareth Evans’s typed draft for my possible agreement

No documents were given to me, that day, while I was in the cell and the four guards in the doorway of the cell will confirm. Mr Lee-Barker , featured in the photo below, will confirm as it was he that unlocked my cell door.

£1000 REWARD to those witnessing my being given any paperwork at all that day

EXTRACT from Police psychiatrist 19^th Oct 2009 Medical Report (para32-40)

OPINION

 Clinical.

32. Maurice Kirk’s history is highly complex, convoluted and difficult to understand. The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties (poor writing and spelling). He developed a personality characterised by narcissism (an abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to him) and paranoia (believing he is the victim of persecution). He also shows evidence of poor judgement, impulsivity and a willingness to hold himself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment. Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed Maurice Kirk’s life and probably had a negative affect on his social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout his life. However, Maurice Kirk and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years both his functioning has deteriorated and that his beliefs have become more intense and overwhelming and at sometimes, though not others, are clearly ” abnormal. Maurice Kirk now shows clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes. The specific area of brain damage affects his ability to monitor and control his behaviour, decreases self-awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded his paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, his beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of a paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature).

 33. With regard to treatment, neither Maurice Kirk’s underlying personality nor brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of his clearly abnormal beliefs (as opposed to his general paranoid view of the world) it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, though it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication has been offered to Maurice Kirk which he has refused.

 34. Clinically it is unclear whether Maurice Kirk’s brain damage is likely to progress. Should it do so his difficulties will become more marked and he will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.

35. With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is also impossible to consider Maurice Kirk’s risk in isolation from those who he encourages to act on his behalf. The risk of Maurice Kirk continuing with his action against South Wales Police and acting in a way that he feels justified to achieve his ends is high, though whether Maurice Kirk himself would be involved in inter-personal violence is less, is cannot be discounted nor can the risk that others would act violently with his encouragement. If Maurice Kirk’s condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase over time

Legal

36.1have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of his plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk’s mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self-awareness, judgement, decision making, self-regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his ‘ problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence.

37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court I would consider him fit to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant matters.

 38. Maurice Kirk’s current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the Criminal Justice System, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with Mental Health Services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.

39.1 I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulty for the court. I am also aware of the difficulties the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk’s perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk require in-patient hospital treatment, I have concerns that a Medium Secure Unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a High Secure Hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of Special Security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk’s communication with and encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.

40. Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit

This forensic psychiatrist was blackmailed by the South Wales Police to write a string of unqualified medical reports as the police’s T20097445 (my trading in machine guns) imminent jury trial was doomed fore failure.

NEW EVIDENCE IN EXETER CROWN COURT MAY QUOSH 5 YEARS of GOAL

Barrister Robin Shellard of Queen’s Square Chambers, Bristol, has been asked to attend, at my expense. Exeter Crown Court this week, to serve still further documentary proof on His Honour Judge Johnson that one his CPS colleagues, barrister, Chis Smyth who, with my barrister, David Leathley, were both denied the ‘court file‘ with both being told that the pertinent pages re ‘service’ or not, of not just one but two purported restraining orders, in my absence, ‘could not be found’!

As I was familiar with the day to day nefarious conduct, within Cardiff courts, I took the precaution of arresting HM Crown Prosecutor, barrister David Gareth Evans, in order for him, on oath in Bristol Crown court years later, to admit neither his draft of the 1st Dec 2011 restraining nor any variation of the order could have been ‘served’ on me or taken taken to me in the cells or on my release as the four guards and HM Clerk of the court, the latter hiding, terrified, in the adjacent cell will confirm

SO, HOW DO THESE ABOVE PRETEND THAT BELOW IS WRONG?

FAO T20170239

Mr R Killick

HM Crown Prosecution Service
Cardiff
Wales

7th October 2017

Dear Sir,

A Proposed Draft Restraining Order re My Fabricated MAPPA Records

My telephone call was again to seek disclosure for Criminal Court of Appeal, ECHR and Civil
Appeals Registry, as to which, when, why and where purported restraining orders were ever
served on me in the first place relating to unlawfully obtained fabricated MAPPA records?

I recall no ‘restraining order’, relating to my police forensic history, having ever been served
on me until an alleged breach of one has led to my eventually being arrested.

Only one draft, in all purported ‘variations’ of the original restraining order, may have been
attempted to be served on me if the evidence, on oath, of the original CPS barrister in Bristol
Crown Court is to be believed. That draft is again requested for the 17th Nov 2017 hearing.

The Court of Appeal dismissed my appeal re 1st Dec 2011 ‘breach’ as both Their Lordships,
Leverson LJ and Mitting J, were seriously misled into believing (see transcript) that a jury
had not written the enclosed jury-note specifically asking for CCTV, Geoamey, police and
magistrate’s clerk notes of ‘service’ of a purported ‘draft’ or otherwise.

The ‘purported ‘service’ was inside my cell surrounded by no less than 4 guards protecting
Lee Barker, he said, as I was branded a rare level 3 category 3 MAPPA and very violent
prisoner! No one, to this day, has told me when and why I was registered and now, why not?
Until a court considers the interests of the general public, by ordering my false MAPPA
forensic history, to be disclosed and appropriately corrected by an outside police force called
in to investigate, then there will be a 5th jury to convene to ask the obvious questions again

This court withheld evidence was also denied me at my civil claim ‘strike-out’ hearing, done
and dusted in mere nanoseconds, polluting both my HM Ministry of Justice and Parole Board
in this travesty of justice that could so easily be remedied by a single Crown Court judge.

You refuse to email me the proposed restraining order but I am likely to agree with it, in any
event, just as long it will finally put a stop to police forces around the world-wide continuing
to apprehend me on any spurious excuses knowing charges will never achieve a conviction.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com
mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

My visit to the ferry for France, for my legal papers, ] was thwarted this week.

watch this space

Your Ref/Ein Cyf: CO/00370/19

18^th March 2021

South Wales Police Profession Standards Complaints Dept

Police HQ

Dear Chief Inspector Steve Grother,

High Level Welsh Police Conspiracy is Starting to Crack at its Foundations

1. A brief summary, to assist any passing jury, of my many decades of complaints to your South Wales Police so called ‘Professional Standards Dept.’ where it continues to abuse CPR, MG6, OASys, Article 5 and other disclosure procedures.

• Was your 17^th May 2019 letter also a coincidence to me in Parc prison, quashing a police investigation into my now having proved that, not just your failed 2009 malicious criminal prosecution of my ‘trading in machine guns’ was an act of fraud but that 4^th Dec 2018 HM Parole Service’s data disclosed you knew your colleagues had fed the prison and courts false serious criminal convictions, including ‘child abuse’, narcotics & firearms dangerous in order I be MAPPA level 3 cat 3 registered?

• Was it simply a coincidence, on 17^th May 2019, I was accused of sending the HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP, a bag of alleged heroin from my cell on F wing in Cardiff prison? I had also written to RCJ’s Court of Appeal but all these letters were being stopped without my being informed, were they not?

• Is it still a coincidence that my letters, both in and out of prison re MPs offering assistance, were neither forwarded to the respective MPs nor returned to me?  It is now accepted, by Taunton police, releasing my letter to John Graham Esq where I was asking him to find me a lawyer, was maliciously stopped by your police despite knowing it contained no anthrax at all?

• A coincidence or just another police conspiracy to frustrate my 10-year running 1CF03361 machine gun damages claim?

• Is it still a coincidence, Chief Inspector, that the South Wales Police telephoned MPs to say that as I had tried to post, what the English authorities described as ‘harmless’ ‘unidentified’ white powder, stinking of prison issue toothpaste and used as glue to stick down recycled envelopes, was contrary to 2001 Prevention of Terrorism Act and therefore I was not to be released from prison other than, possibly, to Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital, indefinitely?

• Is it still a coincidence that my ignored complaint to you, re Caswell Clinic’s rogue doctor’s 19^th October 2009 false medical report, obtained under blackmail in a secret 2^nd Dec 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, that I be incarcerated in Ashworth for life?

• Are you now prepared to reconsider my previously provided facts of complaint, surrounding the 1^st Dec 2011 purported restraining order ‘service’ on me when both HM Crown Prosecutors, David Evans & Chis Smyth state that was impossible?

• Are you prepared to reconsider the criminal conduct surrounding my appointed barrister being told by a district judge that the Cardiff court files, on my numerous ‘restraining orders’ re rogue police psychiatrist, were now mysteriously ‘lost’?

1. Are you prepared to send to a named barrister of my choice your whole file on my apparently futile complaints, over three decades, in order that current criminal allegations in both Taunton and Exeter criminal courts will obviously be quashed?

1. When it comes to the subject of ‘misfeasance in a public office’ then there is ‘nothing new under the Sun’ where the day-to-day nefarious conduct of too many in the South Wales Police is concerned is there, Inspector Steve Grother?

1. My 29^th March 2021 Exeter Crown Court ‘disclosure’ hearing, at 10am, is far too long overdue as, in all my UK criminal and civil cases, if I obtain appropriate police disclosure of the relevant evidence then I invariably win but will you help me?

1.  If statutory CPR procedures are abused, as has been the habit in the decades with successive Cardiff’s law courts, then I am destined not to be allowed to win, whatever the seriousness of the circumstances may be so will you disclose the evidence?

1. For many years the English authorities have been fed spiteful and malicious erroneous forensic evidence by some in your South Wales Police and often generated following your police losing their latest absurd criminal allegations, isn’t that so?

1. These recent criminal allegations lost by the South Wales Police was also based on the fact I had been gaoled for ‘breaching’ a court ‘restraining order’ never ‘served’ on me in the first place but will you obtain Queen Square Chambers proof on this?

1.  Is the level of spite against an Englishman, having won 89% of 113 South Wales Police malicious criminal allegations, resulting in well over forty failed malicious criminal prosecutions being, ignominiously done BUT why will not investigate?

1. In the collapsed case of PC Murphy caught lying about my ‘smuggling pigs’ into Eire in my aircraft why was prosecutor last seen quickly grabbing a CPS file and running for the exit if not to avoid my habit of arresting proven bent officials in courts?

1. Why, in the collapsed case of CPS officer, Soffa, when hiding the true identity of the driver was disclosed in court following his arrest, were not the police officers not then investigated by your department for also ‘perverting the course of justice’?

1. Also in May 2019 why was I gaoled unconvicted for having sent a ‘harmless’ white powder to John Graham and others when Cardiff prison staff knew it was simply the remnants of prison toothpaste used on a WANTED poster stuck on my cell wall?

• The subject on the WANTED poster was the lying Caswell Clinic police doctor who still refuses to correct his 19^th Oct 2009 medical report when knowing it was false and very, very damaging so why will you not help me recover that data from G4S?

• The English authorities will never obtain CPR ‘disclosure’ of relevant evidence from Welsh authorities as it is a reason why I am unable to be legally represented. Without immediate ‘specific disclosure’ for example, relating to my stolen prison correspondence, both in and out of all three welsh prisons and for G4S refusing to return my property, robbed from me on 1^st November 2019, it must come under one of your responsibilities and if not, just who is ultimately responsible?

• Will you supply disclosure or I may not attend further management hearings as the current case is of your doing is it not?

• The incriminating South Wales Police evidence you cause to be released would mean, would it not, my not just winning this latest charade currently in an English court but also a dozen other flawed welsh maliciously brought criminal convictions all  fabricated to prevent my reinstatement onto the veterinary register in order needed to finance my civil claims against you?

• Will you stop my being re-instated onto the UK veterinary register and enter the USA to recover stolen aircraft despite my suing your welsh authorities for almost losing my life, loss of my wife, my health, my wealth and damned near my sanity?

• The welsh prosecution’s motive always was and still is that I be continuously incarcerated in some stinking welsh prison in order to prejudice my now formidable ‘extreme and unusual’ ten or so civil damages claims against the South Wales authorities for their modus operandi of incessant bullying but will you help in obtaining disclosure of evidence to support?

• Alternatively, was this bizarre criminal allegation sparked off by the Avon and Somerset Police by way of a simple telephone call from Wales, my having never forgotten my winning over 70% of many fanciful criminal prosecutions, back in the 70s in Taunton when the % win recorded should have been the other way round based on Home Office guide lines?

• My 75% success in similarly failed criminal prosecutions, in both Guernsey and Alderney law courts, only needed that same ’put the boot in’ telephone call from the insular minded Bailiwick police, in the early 90s, to your police with their inept hatred and acts of deceit on anything English, so can you confirm that repeat for the forthcoming trial?

• Those 113 plus criminal allegations in Wales were levelled at me in the space of about nine years so is your game to repeat such an abuse of process here in civilised England due to plain old fashioned spite for having lost 89% of them?

• Is there a risk that the consequences of your unlawfully withheld disclosure of incriminating forensic evidence will be seen as yet another conspiracy to ‘pervert the course of justice’ as in last year’s withheld ‘machine gun’ evidence by Dolmans, solicitors and its private client, the Chief Constable for the South Wales Constabulary, you also flatly refuse to investigate?

• Will you now investigate why the new ‘machine gun’ evidence, released ten years but not to me, proved my innocence?

• But are you prepared to cause release, for the Exeter trial and HM Royal Court of Justice, the very relevant witness statements gathered by a Llantwit Major Acting Inspector when I was gaoled in Cardiff’s Central Police station and fined £50 for allegedly ‘attempting to kill the Lord Mayor of Cardiff with one of my machine guns’?

• Will you help me recover my G4S stolen legal papers, clothes, shoes and wheelchair because, if not recovered by the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, before the scheduled 29^th March court hearing. then there will be no point in my attending?

• For any new reader of my website I must explain was it last year’s sheer luck or was it the deliberate stopping HHJ Andrew Keiser QC covering up Dolmans ordered to disclose data previously, unknown to me, the eleven and twelve year old forensic reports by both welsh and Nottinghamshire police and Birmingham Proof House on the ‘firing capability’ exhibit ARH1?

• The ‘stripping down’ of the alleged section 5(1) of 1968 Firearms Act ‘prohibited weapon’ was videoed as per Home Office Regulations but why were the police then ordered by Chief Constable Barbara Wilding to destroy this CCTV footage or did it relate to her swiftly resigning her post simply to protect her pension?

• Should I get your disclosure and yet undisclosed Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital CCTV footage, surrounding the police and CPS’s malicious criminal fabrication that I should be locked away for life, due to ‘significant brain damage’, will heads roll?

• Why are police statements, exceeding over a dozen of them, still withheld as all were concocted by the South Wales Poli in order I be registered MAPPA 3/3 to be lawfully ‘shot’ on 22nd June 2009 right in front of my family?

•  Why do you allow copies of my Caswell clinic leaked medical records, needed for the Exeter trial as supporting  my ‘non fitness to plead’ application, are still within the Dr Gaynor Jones sent file to G4S prison on 6^th November 2018 at police HQ?

• But why did the medical records include quotes from the arrogant and ignorant habitual liar, Professor Rodger Wood, writing my having ‘significant brain damage’ was not just due to my ditching my WW2 aircraft in the Caribbean but for being a long-term drinking partner of my veterinary client, actor Oliver Reed Esq?

• Was I therefore deemed medically unfit and therefore unable to ‘stand trial’ for ‘being in possession of a prohibited weapon’ as all knew, by early July 2009, the prosecution case against me was, as the next, most likely already doomed?

• Also, again not unlike the imminent Exeter jury trial, I may finally obtain that Caswell Clinic medical disclosure, too late, snatched by G4S and sought by me ever since October 2009, as the State cannot plead insanity both ways, now can it?

• The sacked NHS doctor, however, is scheduled to return from New Zealand to give at least three days of defence evidence, on my behalf, in the trial as it was he who ‘struck a deal’ with your then boss, Barbara Wilding, in 2009, was it not, for not being reported to NHS (Wales) or to the General Medical Council for having knowingly falsified medical reports to ruin me?

• Do these extreme and unusual levels of quite unchecked South Wales Police criminal conduct require all my civil and criminal cases being transferred well outside Wales and where appropriate, to be heard in higher level courts?

• Will disclosure be ordered by Exeter Crown Court especially as to the 2009 forensic inspection of the ‘gun’, stripped down under video surveillance as per Home Office Regulations, only to reveal, in 2021, it undermined the prosecution’s case?

• Was it relevant previous English police forces had, misguidedly, deemed the film prop ‘gun’ was not even a shot gun?

•  Why withhold these exhibits and witness statements from me and the jury within twenty odd deliberately concocted superfluous files of extraneous irrelevant data if not attempting to further pervert the course of justice?

•  Why were the same police not been investigated from having both unblocked the barrel and had painted the imitation ammunition magazine a different colour of prosecution exhibit, ARH1, just to try and fool the jury?

• Why is your police department covering-up your colleagues and Dolmans, solicitors, conspiracy to now make my civil jury trial 1CF03361 damages claim appearing to be ‘document heavy’ to in order to bar independent scrutiny of an English  jury?

• Why will you not disclose the full South Wales police officer’s 2010 statement, written just days before the 25^th Jan 10 ‘gun’ jury trial in Cardiff Crown Court or was just another attempt to bury incriminating evidence not dissimilar to the currently still withheld Nottinghamshire and Dorset police and MG11 forensic data hidden in your own earlier witness statements?

• Why the level of nefarious conduct by so many senior police, re exhibit ARH 1, when they already knew on the M5, at the ‘dead of night’, that this dummy film prop 1916 WW1 Lewis machine-gun that was bolted on my DH2 replica 1916 Battle of the Somme biplane in 2000, was flown at the Farnborough air and all orchestrated by lawyers in fraud, was it not?

•  Why, today, the same fundamental flaws in the CPS psyche here in England, re purported ‘breaches’ of my ‘restraining’ orders when all know the restraining orders to ‘protect’ rogue Caswell Clinic NHS sacked forensic psychiatrist, were deliberately NOT SERVED on their MAPPA level 3 category 3 MAPPA victim?

•  I say again, this is confirmed by your CPS and Exeter’s HM Prosecutors from Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, was it not?

• Why do you still block the relevant disclosure confirmed by HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) and in these current Exeter proceedings where, again, charges were dropped to try and cover-up the scale of lies dreamed up by your mates?

• Was I obstructed to defend myself from decades of police bullying and incessant harassment whilst practicing veterinary science in the Vale of Glamorgan, just for the South Wales Police to falsely have my name removed from the veterinary register or was to curtail my income to fund such an awesome ordeal in prosecuting, in a foreign land, such a corrupt ‘authority’ clearly accountable to no one?

• This current criminal allegation originated from Taunton back in the 70’s where, while facing the criminal indictment of the ‘theft of the Chief Superintendent’s personal note book’, why was I given eleven police witnesses and sufficient police controlled ‘disclosure’ needed for that speedy acquittal requiring no defence being tendered so will you cause disclosure?

• In 2019 your welsh police had fabricated that I had breached a court bail condition, this time by not returning by 7pm to a Cardiff bail hostel from my second doctor’s appointment in Taunton in the space of 24 hours but will you disclose the truth?

• Why was I not allowed to catch a Cardiff train for Taunton five minutes earlier, before 8am or it would be a breach of my MAPPA bail terms originally handed down in order to secure my release from HMP Parc on 1^st November 2019?

• Similarly, in 2015, you refer to my 2015 re call to Swansea prison without disclosing any evidence so not now for Exeter?

• While in Bridgend prison why was I so severely bullied and assaulted for fictitious criminal convictions dreamed up by your boyos that I had never existed? Will your department continue to ignore this complaint of mine also needed for Exeter trial?

• Why is my sister and I refused promised Parole Board files for Exeter trial stopped by your police when it was your parole officer, in his ‘leaking’ my 2018 police prepared OASys data, revealing further misfeasance by a fabricated criminal record?

• Why are all my legal papers and machine gun papers and MP letter log, especially, covering most of these above complaints, were clearly robbed from me on instructions from your own South Wales Police still not returned to me?

•  Why are so many senior ranked Bridgend based police officers all refusing to recover any of them stolen by G4S, including my other legal papers, wheelchair, shoes and clothes and my Caswell clinic and NHS (Wales) records specifically emailed to HMP Parc for my Taunton GP and Musgrove hospital’s gastro-enterology teams asking desperately to have copy of them?

• Why will you not investigate any of these above identified serious criminal allegations so easily proved?

• It all stinks, Chief Inspector Steve Gother, does it not?

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Cc to HM Crown Prosecution Service England) & HM Crown Court Exeter.

FAO  

Chief Superintendent D Richards 

Head of south wales Police Professional Standards Department  

Police HQ  

Bridgend. 

Your ref SG/JDL/32/co/00370/19 

My ref T20200177 

19^th March 2021 

Dear Sir, 

Police Failed Disclosure of Evidence as it would undermine its Prosecution’s Case 

Please find enclosed my 18^th March 2021 explanatory complaint letter to Chief Inspector Steve Gother on website who, in decades, has never disclosed any evidence under his or your control as it undermines your prosecution’s case. 

This yet undisclosed incriminating evidence is needed for the Exeter Crown Court Jury, triggered by your officers confiscating my property and including my letters to MPs when in HMP Parc, ‘over the wall’ complaining of your officer’s incessant 24/7 bullying. 

Yours, 

Maurice J Kirk BVSc  

Cc to CPS and Exeter Crown Court 

Trouble at Mill?

1. Why are you refusing me relevant disclosure re my main defence witness, Alun Cairns MP?
2. Why do you not identify when I was supposed to have known about, yet alone served it, where and by whom with what witnesses, the purported 1^st Dec 2011 Cardiff magistrates Restraining Order resulting from an unqualified doctor blackmailed by Welsh police?
3. Why did your Bristol prosecuting barrister, in circa 2017, confirm that he could not locate, safely, the manner in which I was purportedly served a ‘variation’ of the 1^st Dec 2011 order? No, of course Mike Smythe could not, all another welsh court fabrication!
4. Please supply certified true copies of the two ‘restraining orders’ for RCJ and  confirm that Cardiff CPS barrister admitted, on oath at Bristol Crown Court , that I could not of been  ‘served’ the 1^st ‘restraining order’ as it had not even been ‘handed down’ yet!

10^th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff

I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions.

Serious Assaults                                                                            Incident 1900418801

1. After my Feb 2019 unlawful ‘recall’ to prison from a Cardiff parole hostel I was assaulted on numerous occasions in Parc prison with one incident already reported over the ‘floor buffer’  on A2 wing. All required medical attention and captured on CCTV & body cameras.  
2. The 2^nd filmed significant assault was in June 2019 when I was forcibly removed from my 2^nd missing wheel chair by unnecessary force from seven officers carrying me back to B block. 
3. The 3^rd main incident was in Nov 2019 when I was snatched from my cell by unprovoked excessive force using no less than eight G4S officers using handcuffs on my wrists behind my back. This deliberate pain was inflicted continued from B wing to the main gate where I was ‘released’ for Bristol Royal Infirmary attention. This included x-rays due to my hip prosthesis having suffered partial subluxation of my hip joint and prescription analgesics for a month. 
4. The incidents have left me feeling severely intimidated, vulnerable and in constant pain.

Deliberate False Forensic History Yet Again

1. In Sept & Dec18 G4S had inadvertently released Caswell Clinic medical data by fabricated police criminal convictions including ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘narcotics’, ABH and ‘FTA’.
2. Oct 19 HM Parole Board hearing, with evidence from a retired magistrate, had also revealed why a prison had needed such violent ‘constraints’. Both parole officer & prison supervisor had vehemently opposed release as I was, ‘violent and extremely dangerous’. To whom was I a danger, exactly, turned out to be only the Chief Constable? This caused my swift release. 
3. That CCTV and more leaked 2009 Barry police station MAPPA level 3 category 3 data of Barbara Wilding’s conspiracy, to have me shot, is applied for to be disclosed at the ‘machine gun’ hearing on 24^th January as it all identifies the original culprit’s nefarious conduct.  

‘Heroin’ to Alun Cairns MP & false Allegations 

4. My Feb 19 release was due so police concocted reasons to stop my mail in and out of Cardiff & Parc prisons to protract time in prison and delay my civil claims. The ‘white powder’ found in my two MP letters had simply been remaining traces of toothpaste originally used for gluing exhibits on to my cell wall when originals had been stolen by my key liaison officer. 

Further Deliberate Theft of my Possessions

Despite my pleadings and requests by parole staff G4S continues to refuse to return my wheel chair and legal papers as the latter is needed, of course, for my 10am 24^th January 2020 civil court proceedings against both G4S and the South Wales Police. Today’s MG11 VPS written complaint to very patient South Wales police officers will, no doubt, end up in the police HQ shredder as did the ones, re police paint gun, to try and fool the 2010 jury!

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

South Wales Police deny my GP G4S medical records – YouTube

one of My pleading letters for help to MPs following police written advise to contact them

—

Failed South Wales Police Disclosure of Court Evidence

1. On 22^nd June 2009 SWP launched Operation Challis in the hope I may be shot as MAPPA 3/3.

• On 22^nd June 2009 SWP launched ‘Operation Dandelion’ to snatch our 10-year-old daughter.

• In September 2009 a psychologist allowed me to read his letter to Caswell Clinic.

• He indicated I had ‘significant brain damage’ from ditching my aircraft in the Caribbean.

•  He also indicated I suffered PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder’) du to police persecution.

• He wrote ‘brain damage’ was from having been ‘a long-term drinking partner of Oliver Reed’

• In June 2011 the jury believed I had received a 1^st Dec 2010 Restraining Order- NOT correct.

• In 2016 the jury believed I had served on me a ‘variation’ to 1^st Dec 2011 Order-NOT correct.

• In May 2019 prison staff said I had sent a ‘white powder’ to HM Secretary of State for Wales.

1. In 1^st Aug 2019 SWP interview I was not informed I had sent ‘white powder’ to John Graham.

1. In 29^th May 2020 SWP interview I was informed I sent no letters to other MPs- NOT correct.

1. I am refused disclosure of audit trail of the above 10 years giving me 5 years’ incarceration.

1. Today I am refused a witness subpoena for John Graham

1. I ill ask Connor Burns MP again, his constitutional member of Parliament

DO YOU KNOW WHO NORMAN IS AND WHAT HE SUFFERED?

Harassment Act? Should it be re-drafted?

Inbox

Norman Scarth	16:48 (15 minutes ago)
to me

Protection from Harassment Act?  Should it be re-drafted?  No.   This is not a case of a Statute which was ‘badly drafted’ : I

t was very carefully drafted (not for its supposed purpose), but as a weapon for Stasi Police to persecute law-abiding people- & has been used by them with enthusiasm! It should be wiped from the Statute Bok complete!

Norman Scarth

---

From: Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>
Sent: 01 February 2021 11:18
Subject: ‘Stalking’ a Member of Parliament I would be grateful for your view on the 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act as a ‘bad law’ or not?

Your view on its statutory defence, ‘to detect and prevent crime’. Is it sufficient?

Should it not be re-drafted?

—
Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202                                                                            www.kirkflyingvet.commauricejohnkirk.wordpress.commaurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Reply For ward

Alun Cairns MP

House of Commons

Westminster

2nd February 2021 RECORDED DELIVERY

Dear Sir,

You will recall I was goaled in May 2019 for sending you and John Graham a ‘white powder, described by Cardiff prison officers as possible anthrax spores or heroin.

I never established what the South Wales Police analysis was nor whether you received the letters at the House of Commons or informed the police had stopped them?

Yesterday, in Bridgwater police station, I was allowed to examine one of my letters stopped from leaving both Cardiff and G4S badly run HMP Parc, Bridgend , Others included court letters addressed to HM Royal Courts of Justice, lawyers and family.

You will recall on 1st Nov 2019 I was robbed of my legal and papers by bullying G4S staff (eight of them) causing the need for my Bristol Royal Infirmary emergency visit.

Whereas I obtained the indictment under 2001 Terrorism Act, for sending a ‘white powder’ at the same time to John Graham Esq, who has already written to you on the grave matter, neither he nor I have received your replies. did you reply?

I was told at the police station neither I nor John Graham were interviewed on the matter of ‘white powder’ sent to you from my prison cell and yet it was all the prison gossip, resulting in the need for calling in the drug dogs and a 32 minute cell search while I was locked up in the shower unit, on F wing, in my wheelchair.

Where as no drugs or Lewis machine guns were found were you, Mr Cairns, contacted by the South Wales Police, at all and did you receive all my letters from both HMP Parc & HMP Cardiff?

As I was in prison for about five months, having gone no where near a court room over the incident, I never did stablish its outcome and identification of the ‘strongly smelling of peppermint white as the indictment was finally dropped.

EXTRACT of email to COPS (Wales)

A Simplification of my meeting at Bridgwater police station

Copy of my email

On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, 11:57 Maurice Kirk, <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com> wrote:

Good Morning, 

My visit today to inspect court exhibits

I need to familiarise myself on dates, times and place while at the police station 

eg, in advance for me to collect at 3pm today.

1, When and where was I charged for alleged offenses?

REPLY

“You were not charged or interviewed under caution relating to Alun Cairns MP and John Graham”

2. Was I given copies of all witness statements taken by police and prison staff?

REPLY

“You will have to obtain that information from the CPS (Wales?)”

3. ‘white powder’ — I am yet to be given a conclusion of its identity, possible source and laboratory data supporting that conclusion?

REPLY

“You will have to obtain that information from the CPS”

4. Is it that the South Wales Police deny I wrote to Alun Cairns MP in 2019/2020 or simply refusing to supply copies of them?

REPLY

“You will have to obtain that information from the CPS”

to be continued

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

of 2 NS File ref: Protection From Harassment Act

The Protection from Harassment Act, 1997. 

The Quislings who now rule Britain are fiendishly clever at thinking up new laws which, on
the face of it, appear to be for good purpose, but are actually designed as a weapon to
persecute law-abiding people.   
Such a one is the ’1997 Protection from Harassment Act’. 
To go back a few years: 
Over several decades, women who had begged the police for protection from
stalkers (mostly ex-husbands or ex-lovers) were told, ”He hasn’t broken the law.  Until he
does, there is nothing we can do”.   A significant number of these terrified women were in
fact murdered by the very men from whom they begged for protection.  
Politicians did nothing but wring their hands & repeat what the police said.
Eventually, responding to calls that ’Something must be done’ , much belatedly, they did
introduce the’1997 Protection from Harassment Act’.    
Tragically, it did nothing whatsoever to reduce such murders (which continued as
before!)   
(LATE NOTE: The Guardian of 26/2/2014 carried stories of several women murdered recently
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/26/cassandra-hasanovic-murder-domestic-
violence  
“In another case, Christine Chambers and her daughter, Shania, were murdered in
June 2011 by David Oakes. In August 2012 an IPCC report found that Essex police
had failed to recognise any pattern or connection between events and identified a
failure to share information between agencies. 
Between June and September this year there have been four more domestic
homicides in Essex. The force has confirmed that at least three of the victims had
contact with it before their deaths.”) 
 
 
The REASON it failed is because it was not designed to do
what it purported to do!  It was only ever intended as a
weapon to persecute law-abiding people  - & is used with
enthusiasm by police thugs! 
The incongruity of this very badly mis-used law is beyond anything George Orwell imagined.
  
Consider: 
It is NOT a crime to walk down a street, nor to offer leaflets in a public place.   
However, if you walk down a street twice, or offer leaflets on TWO occasions - as I did - this
lawful activity becomes a most terrible crime, resulting in a massively expensive (&
most devious) operation - involving at least 15 police officers -  to arrest the ‘dangerous
criminal’ in his Sheltered Housing home (sheltered??) & drag him off in handcuffs to
Bradford Lubyanka!   
Run for your lives – he’s got a LEAFLET!       
What did my leaflets say?  I was inviting His ‘Honour’ Judge Jonathan Lee Rose to resign.    

Page 2 of 2 NS File ref: Protection From Harassment Act
There were three hearings in Leeds Magistrates’ Court, then it was transferred over the
Pennines to Manchester, where there were three more hearings (think of the expense – on
top of the police expenditure in money & manpower!)   
By the time of the first hearing in Manchester City Magistrates’ Court, I had, belatedly,
accepted that Britain is not a safe place for anyone who tells the truth, & fled the land of my
birth for safety in Ireland.   
I did send a message to the court that they should go ahead in my absence, which they
could have done, especially as the ‘offence’ had been reduced to ne which was ‘not
imprisonable’.    
District Judge Jonathan Taaffe (who is NOT a magistrate!) declined to do so.  Instead, he
adjourned & issued a warrant for my arrest – WITHOUT BAIL!   He also issued a ‘Restraining
Order’, that if I dare to mention Judge Rose’s name – in any way at all – I am liable to FIVE
YEARS in prison for ‘Contempt of Court’.   THAT is the fate that awaits me if I dare set foot in
Britain again!   
There – by publishing his name now, I am in trouble again!    
Well, I have declared my contempt for those who run the British Courts, & have done so
loudly & clearly on many occasions.   
Sending me to prison (or to a Nuthouse – which is the real intention) will certainly not lessen
my contempt for them.   At the third Manchester hearing in June 2012, Taaffe did declare
me guilty, with fine & costs totalling £650, which was taken in weekly instalments from my
Old Age Pension.   
Fortunately, while the several monthly performances of the pantomime were going on in
Man City Mags, I was in the Republic of Ireland safe from the malice of Rose, Taaffe & their
cronies.   
What a tragedy – NOT for me, but for Britain! 
Norman Scarth.    
‘There are no bad laws, for if it is bad, it is not law’. (Sir William Blackstone, 1723 – 1780)  
in The Commentaries on the Laws of England)

Have you experienced a police helicopter hovering over your home while 20 odd police surround you, many armed, in order to shoot the father dead and plan be , they if fail, snatch your 10 year old daughter with social services in attendance.

PLEASE think about it

IT WILL TAKE ME 18 MONTHS TO GET CD OF MY POLICE INTERVIEW TAPE RE SENDING ‘HEROIN’ TO HM SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES FROM MY CARDIFF PRISON CELL, SUCH IS THEIR LEVEL OF NEFARIOUS CONDUCT

Why? The interview was conducted in an unlawful manner

Sabine took the brunt of the deceit in our thoroughly corrupt courts and found herself gaoled for many years for simply speaking the truth

FAR MORE IMPORTANT is the current state of our UK law courts that Sabine exposed

A ‘bomb of hope’ had reached me when I got emails from Neelu with her campaigning efforts. On Christmas Eve Wikipedia’s entry on ‘octagons’ was delivered with a beautiful card and a colouring book from another most loyal friend and supporter. Am I lucky to know them!!!

Thus I had my ‘parallel octagons’ for breakfast today when an officer brought me gifts and cards from three sources.

Maybe most significantly “Fabula” A framework for fiction writers. 
For I continue to seek desperately the right angle and story for my insights, discoveries and innovations. Fed up with words, I stopped writing my diary about myself rather than as self. I am also fed up with RECORDING my events and experiences. Too much more of the same. 

My new wall of support covers the last toothpaste stain, as Christmas Cards shine with their beauty over the ugly grey beige of the wall.

One gift came from Martin Houston who broadcasts on “We Think Freely” Radio. (WTF) dlive.tv/WTFR – 9pm to 11pm Tuesdays & Fridays. It’s “The Covid Con; A Ware” by Courtesy Adam Lawrence, An empty table of contents but a powerful symbol         $         The money con in a nutshell.                                                                                                                                                                                 

The hand crafted gifts another friend sent were retained once again. After all I am treated like the average prisoner ready to self harm in a most ingenious fashion. Once again address of sender removed!

A set of exquisite cards would help every-body in any lockdown, lockin or lockup.
Little Joys: images on one side and a short caption on the other – to remind us of all the little pleasures we can feel, if and when we are attentive.

During my daily (wearily) ration of fresh air, Father Christmas came in the shape of a Nurse, delivering magnesium that was due a week ago. End of anxiety!!!
Yesterday I received 90 complimentary tablets of sunshine vitamin D3. `One of the best kept secrets in this place – like the Prison Advisory Service – an excellent Charity who sent a letter on the 7th /12 which also arrived this morning. Not enough postage caused the delay. 

Creativity abounds inside to outside. Which crack will let the light come in? Who will be inspired to do what afresh, anew? IF ONLY I COULD THANK EVERYONE WHO’S BEEN KIND AND GENEROUS TO ME! When packaging is removed with senders addresses, I am left hanging and senders will be worrying…. did it ever get there. It has even happened with emails!

But my bottom line is unshakable faith and an amazing capacity of mind and body to OVERCOME whatever obstacles are before us. I even walk again! Every day a little bit faster! Into 2021 full of POSITIVE surprizes, I hope! – Christmas Greetings from Sabine

Case number 632000096322 R v Tana Huggins – maurice@kirkflyingvet.com – Kirk Flying Vet Mail (google.com)

CHILD SNATCHING PARIAH

A lawyer’s lucrative syndrome put both Mrs Sabine MacNeill and myself into long prison terms purely due to succession of spineless UK judges not being fit for purpose instead of putting a stop, once and for all, to the disgusting practice of lawyer fraud

1st Dec 2011 Cardiff arrest by South Wales Police refusing my attending London court so Harringay Council fraud can snatch six Musa Nigerian children for profit and the very same day the Welsh authorities also fabricated I was served a restraining order!

His mate, HM Crown Prosecutor, Mr Robin Shellard, of Queen Square Chambers, Bristol, keeps promising me, before His Honour Judge Peter Johnson, my John Graham Esq letters back, confiscated by HMP Parc and HMP Cardiff in 2019 but it is now over 19 months and still nothing! –

Despite my visiting four times now, on CPS insistence, not even a usable Taunton police station CD of my 1st August 2019 South Wales Police interview, under caution, can I obtain as the welsh police refuse to produce it.

The CD content, of course, reveals the level of deceit the welsh authorities are prepared to stoop meaning it is now destined for immediate world-wide publicity on 4/5 websites to reveal as to ‘what really goes on in our UK justice system’ boasting superiority.

— Chaos or just the usual South Wales Police giving my English judiciary the usual ‘run-around’ due to plain spite? My letters to MPs caused extensive prison and police investigation but not one piece of data, yet, have the welsh police disclosed to HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) relating to my believed to be anthrax spores to Alun Cairns MP from my Cardiff prison cell, Conor Burns MP, Selaine Saxby MP when simply asking for help.

In the Taunton Shire Hall                                         G00TA220 / T20200177

                                                Maurice John Kirk

Claimant

v

                           G4S Care and Custodial Services Ltd

Defendant

Application for disclosure due to HM Prosecution Service’s refusal to disclose relevant evidence and for the court to Order the return of his possessions including medical records legal papers and correspondence withheld by G4S and HMP Cardiff since Defendant/Claimant was a prisoner there in 2019/20

Grounds for applications

1. On the 24 January 2020 HHJ Keyser asked that the Claimant re-serve this Application on the Court and Defendant(s) where the Claimant understands all Defendant(s) are represented by Counsel Mr Christian Howells of 30 Park Place. The Clerk at 30 Park Place tells the Claimant to serve on Dolmans, solicitors, Cardiff.

2. There could be two ways of approaching the background. A simple version is G4S have the possession and legal papers belonging to the Claimant and should hand them back. While G4S do not respond and remain the thief. Therefore, unless possessions and papers are returned a Judicial Review to Order their return would seem appropriate with arrest of the HM Governor of HMP Parc  

3. The more complex is that G4S make decisions as a part of a multi agency approach and these multi agency parties act with malice with Police and Dr Roger Thomas of Caswell Clinic trying to harm the Claimant to thwart both his criminal defences and civil claims that may well help expose their, and their colleague’s wrongdoing. The Defendant/Claimant tries to help the Court by being brief and avoiding the more complex detail at this stage.

 The Simple Background and Facts

4. In 2018/19 possessions, including legal papers, were stolen from the Claimant by G4S at HMP Parc and staff on F wing of HMP Cardiff.

5. Although there were initial decisions were made to confiscate possessions and legal papers, there were also additional decisions that are now made as of 1^st November 2019 and to the present to refuse to return possessions, including legal and medical papers and wheelchair.

6. Unknown to the Claimant, his sister Celia Jeune, had been told by Probation on 31 October 2019, an unclear account of how the Claimant would be released from HMP Parc early on the 1 November 2019 and that the Claimant must as a part of licence conditions, immediately travel to meet a probation officer in Taunton by early that afternoon.

7. Therefore, Celia Jeune arranged a car be there to take the then 74-year old Claimant from HMP Parc to Taunton by early that afternoon 

8. On 1 November 2019 without explanation to the Claimant, the Claimant was forcibly removed from his cell and taken outside of the prison and placed to sit in a car outside, to impose he leave the prison on licence.

9. Because the Claimant was forcibly placed in the car and told he must immediately leave HMP Parc and travel to Taunton or else he would be in breach of new licence conditions, it was implicit in these arrangements that the Claimant was forced to travel away without his possession and legal papers being returned to him ever since.

10. Regards developments since 1 November 2019. Whereas the Claimant had been at a Cardiff Bail Hostel in January and February 2019 and Bradley Hughes of HM Probation Service was enthusiastic and successful in arranging the Claimant’s possessions and legal papers were returned to the Claimant from the Bail Hostel. In contrast neither Probation Officer Brad Hughes nor the Claimant has gained a sensible response from G4S (or any other party) regards the Claimant’s possessions and legal papers that are still held by G4S at HMP Parc.

11. Similar issues also occurred between December 2018 to February 2019 when at a mid point in his sentence in the Claimant was placed from HMP Parc to the Bail Hostel. But the Defendant(s) had not released possessions including a wheel chair supplied by the Claimant’s brother.

12. The Claimant filed for Judicial Review with a sealed form 11 October 2019 and a sealed N244 26 November 2019. On 24 January 2020 HHJ Keyser QC said to re-serve the Claim and so the Claimant re-send the Claim forms with this Grounds for Claim. HMP Parc had confiscated it.

13. Dolmans, South Wales Police solicitors, refuse to comment so to justify an application for Judicial Review. The Claimant understands that in an application for Judicial Review while at the permission stage, that a lay unrepresented Claimant does not need to submit a statement but rather can do so after permission is granted, when it is clearer what the issues are from CPR disclosure.

14. There is no reason for the decision to withhold the Claimant’s property of legal papers other than to prejudice civil and criminal proceedings.

Request release of medical records held at HMP Parc to Claimant

15. The Claimant has been unable to get copies of medical records held at HMP Parc and particularly those sent from Caswell Clinic by Dr Gaynor Jones again desperately requested by the Claimant’s Taunton GP.

Special, different and harsher treatment (that was serious abuse) aimed to interfere in the ability of the Claimant to progress his civil claims.

16. During 2017 to 2019 the Claimant was singled out for special, different and harsher treatment while at HMP Parc and at Cardiff’s Bail Hostel.

17. There was physical abuse by staff and by other prisoners. Harsher conditions at prison and the bail hostel. Medication was withheld and G4S and parties interfered with correspondence and even withheld letters being sent or received.  

18. The harm caused by interference with the Claimant’s right to receive or send correspondence can be far reaching.

19. It is important to note that what is certain when we consider the evidence is that the Claimant’s criminal and civil cases involve the multi agency partners and their lawyers using information they very obviously know not to be true.

20. Therefore, when looking at the involved evidence it can become very obvious indeed that the Defendant(s) aim to interfere with and prevent Claimant from progressing his civil or criminal claims regards G4S, South Wales Police, Dr Tegwyn Williams, Dr Roger Thomas, Professor Rodger Wood, the Defendant’s lawyers and multi agency parties.

21. Also, the Defendant(s) via multi agency generated false criminal convictions and a false risk assessment and furthermore made that known to the prisoners and supported prisoners to be both violent and intimidating to the Claimant.

22. When G4S knew what they were saying was untrue, thee South Wales Police included false convictions for ‘child abuse’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘firearms’  so that staff and prisoners were united in being intimidating, menacing and violent o the Claimant.

23. Obviously, with the Claimant locked in a prison wing with these staff and prisoners and the MAPPA agents causing rumours to harm the Claimant regards ‘child abuse’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘fire-arms’. Then this cumulative effect of all MAPPA agents doing, had an adverse effect on the Claimant’s mental and physical wellbeing, especially, as he had good reason to expect to suffer substantial harm.

24. The adverse effect of all the above and interference with his correspondence, denied medical care and expecting to suffer substantial physical harm would obviously cause a normal reasonable unrepresented person to not be able to keep pace with complex technical legal proceedings and it follows as reasonable to believe that G4S has interfered with Claimant’s ability to progress his civil claims.

25. It also follows, to add to the above, that if G4S and in particular, South Wales Police, had corrected their records to be truthful in showing that the doctor (who the Claimant is accused of harassing) does wrong, then the Claimant would not be in prison.

Claimant Caswell Clinic diagnosed with ‘significant brain damage’

26. The evidence shows as very obvious that the Claimant was only in prison due to South Wales Police bringing prosecutions using information they knew was not true, with the result that either the sentence was not proportionate and was too harsh or to mean the Claimant should not even have been prosecuted.  And may be the doctor should be prosecuted with indictable offenses.             

27. But when all the above is most lengthy, complex and technical to explain and detail HHJ Keyser QC has told the unrepresented Claimant to resubmit this application for Judicial Review in such a rushed and short time scale so that the Claimant is unable to detail all of the huge horrific interference that has occurred and link each of the many acts or omissions to relevant law.

28. Direction is sought with regards which losses and damage for interference in civil claims should come under for example, a new High Court Queens Bench Claim, as opposed to Judicial Review. The current criminal conduct by the Welsh authorities on T20200177 Exeter Crown Court proceedings is deliberate to pervert the course of justice and trial should be heard opposite the victim’s home.     

The Law

29. Although the Claimant assumes there will be long standing laws regards prisoners not having their possessions returned, the Claimant understands that in modern times the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8 right to respect for private and family life is more commonly used.

30. The Claimant understands that the interpretations or threshold of Article 8 right to respect for private and family life very strongly supports interpretations that Claimant’s legal papers and possessions should be returned to him. ECHR case ‘Gold and Silver’, ‘rings a bell.’

31. The Claimant understands it is long established that the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8 right to respect for private and family life gives a protection that there should be no interference with correspondence and post and this has now been proved at HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc

32. The Claimant understands that under 1988 Human Rights Act if prison staff wish to search legal papers then the prisoner must be present.

33. Furthermore, the Claimant understands that generally speaking it is said Human Rights lawyers say to emphasise the word “respect” and how there is a right to “respect” of the rights that arise under the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8.

34. The Claimant understands it is long established that prison staff should not interfere in the right to receive and send correspondence, particularly so when the correspondence relates to progressing legal cases against the Welsh authorities. 

35. We are aware that the ECHR/Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8 is a qualified right that can be interfered with if there is justification.

36. If interference in the qualified right occurs, then the reasons for the decision to interfere should be given 

37. The Claimant is aware that public bodies must give reasons and explanations for Decisions. 

38. The Defendant(s) have given reasons that are primarily a tissue of lies

39. The Claimant seeks to be helpful and has kept this application brief. If G4S and south Wales Police now give reasons, then the Claimant seeks opportunity to reply by an amended Grounds for Claim and Statement. Hence a statement is not yet submitted until the Claimant knows the reasons what the police and G4S may give.  

Withheld Medical Treatment

40. Withholding medical treatment is normally regarded as a breach of the Human Right Act Article 8 right to respect for private and family life.

False criminal history released to prisoners who were encouraged to attack violently

41.  The Defendant and the Multi Agency partners generated and used a false criminal history and a false risk assessment which they knew were not true, and which were false in many ways, but included wrongly asserting child abuse, narcotics, (cultivating supply and use), ABH and firearms convictions and future risk.   

42. Creating this specific kind of false risk assessment to the Claimant who is locked inside a prison wing with staff and prisoners who all seek harm (and substantial harm that goes with this type of problem) is both mentally and physically threatening so that the Claimant had sound reason to believe that serious harm may occur to him. To therefore reach the high threshold of Article 3 cruel and degrading treatment.

43. The Claimant knows that all data laws and rules have come from ECHR Article 8 right to respect for private and family life and that a European Human Rights defamatory type of attack on a person using false ‘risk assessment’ that is fabricated is a breach of ECHR/Human Rights Act 19988 Article 8 right to respect to private and family life.   

Remedy Sought

44. The Claimant asks for a Court Order for the South Wales Police, HMP Cardiff and G4s run HMP Parc to immediately return his possessions and legal papers, including his wheelchair.

45. Additionally, the Defendant/Claimant seeks for release of his medical records held at HMP Parc, including those sent from Caswell Clinic, to HMP Parc. For both HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc to release to the Claimant, in these criminal proceedings, all his correspondence so far referred to in T2020177 criminal proceedings.

Compensation for abuse and Compensation for any harm, lost opportunity and losses in the civil claims.

46. To comply with HHJ Keyser QC’s Directions and time scale means the Claimant has to submit and re-serve papers at short notice without the Claimant having access to legal advice and not having time to detail facts in ways to match which laws are relevant.

47. Direction is sought as to which grievances of the Claimant can be dealt with via Judicial Review and which ones by a new Claim.

I believe the contents of this Grounds for Claim to be true.

Maurice John Kirk BVSc                                                 29^th December 2020 

Conor Burns MP , John Graham Esq’s very able MP for East Bournemouth

Welsh authority expected to steal my letters in and out of its prisons, over a ten year period and expect to get away with it …..disgusting little individuals

FAO of Exeter Crown Court/HMP Cardiff/HMP Parc/South Wales Police REDACTED

Dear Sirs,                                       Re: cases T20200177/1CF03361/BS614159+2, G00TA220

A VIDIO MEMORY OF A DELIGHTFUL 45 MINUES IN AN ENGLISH CROWN COURT

South Wales Police to disclose Stolen Prison Letters – YouTube

Case management T20300177 is the question of how the court and jury need to know:

1. That the ‘bad character’ evidence totally contradicts itself and becomes obvious evidence of the corruption that occurred in prosecutions and convictions, based on evidence that police and complainant knew, was neither true, accurate nor complete.

• For example, if the ‘bad character’ evidence is reliable? That would mean doctor TW, who colluded with errant South Wales police officers in the 2009 ‘deactivated’ Lewis gun failed prosecution, was being honest. If the doctor was honest and correct that means I was then and am now far too ill with ‘significant irreversible brain damage’ and Paranoid Delusional Disorder PDD to organise my case for tomorrow. The hearing of 22 Dec 2020 should not proceed as planned due to my medical state.

• Also, if the doctor and ‘bad character’ evidence is reliable (with irreversible conditions) then I was and am too ill to have received the sentences I received from 2010 to 2019 or receive as severe bail conditions and a sentence even if convicted in case T20200177. 

• Another major contradiction is if the ‘bad character’ evidence is true, obviously I would not be able to write from prison as all mail would be MAPPA2/3 monitored and it was xxxxxxxxxxx duty to question how the prison’s failure to supervise a high profile  alleged offender is what caused her ‘harassment’ and G4S, HMP Cardiff and Parc Governors ought to be in the dock not me. A prisoner could not know that passing a letter for MP, for the authorities to decide if it could be sent, would cause harassment?

• Please could the CPS explain this legal point in if the ‘bad character’ evidence is true I could not harass a person from prison as I would not know what experts who monitor my mail at a prison authority decides to send would amount to harassment?  Where are my letters to Secretary for State for Wales and John Graham if they are not relevant?

• The CPS cannot have it both ways. They need to be absolutely clear about my state of mind and health. Does the detail in the ‘bad character ‘evidence mean

1. If the ‘bad character’ evidence is true then I am “too ill” to manage proceedings on 22 December 2020 and following?

• If he ‘bad character’ evidence is true that means I am so very ill that the CPS and court explore whether to drop the case on compassionate grounds?

• Or as the detail in the ‘bad character’ evidence says I am so very ill the CPS agree I should agree I receive a much more minor sentence if convicted next year.

• It follows if I do not have ‘significant irreversible brain damage’ and PDD then the CPS cannot use the ‘bad character’ as reliable or else the CPS will be committing a criminal wrong of deceit before an English Crown Court? 

• If the CPS says the ‘bad character’ evidence is true could the CPS explain exactly how the conditions I am supposed to have affects these proceedings and if convicted? In the Tony Martin case, who shot young burglars as they fled his property, he only had a three-year sentence when I have had five-years for simply saying the ‘truth’. 

• Please see my 1CF03361 Cardiff County Court documents to understand the medical evidence and it’s context and how it was deliberately falsified to try to lock me away, indefinitely, in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital as MAPPA 3/3 victim of the State ( within top 5% most dangerous in the UK)‘too ill’, when the 2009 prosecution conspiracy started failing (3^rd day of trial, 2^nd day of prosecution evidence).      

• Errant police used TW to have me prosecuted 4 times from 2010 to2019 on the basis that the medical evidence was true and I was unreasonable with harassment to object.  

1. But Errant elements of the South Wales Police and the doctor (now sacked by the NHS) who colluded with them, used false medical evidence they obviously knew to be false and misleading at the Cardiff courts from August 2009 up to the present day.

1. It was xxxxxxxxxx who is supposed to have arranged someone to talk with me to explore how she may take up the casework of people who act for the authorities having been very dishonest in creating this kind of ‘bad character’ evidence, based on what ‘they know is not true’.

1. It is all too complicated for me to write to xxxxxxxx Someone is needed to talk through the issues with me on the phone or in person. As it was xxxxxxxxxxx job to arrange someone to speak with me, on these severe G4S/HMP Cardiff/police bullying issues, I could not possibly know that my asking for help, xxxxxxxxxxx and highly privileged to help a xxxxxxxxxxxx, was interrupted as ‘harassment’.

1. Subsequently, I found xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, was blocking my correspondence.       

1. Also where legal casework jams-up by no obvious procedure like the notorious1997 Prevention of Harassment Act , to resolve matters and veers towards to ‘no course in law’, that is where a xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is supposed to, without bias, intervene on behalf of their xxxxxxxxxx. So how can I “know or ought to know” that using a correct laid down process is harassment?

1. Of course, if the court in case proceeds on the basis I am medically fit and in a fairly normal state of health for someone of my age, then the jury need to explore all these contradictions in the evidence of ‘bad character’ and hear from many witnesses with regards the contradictions and dishonesty in papers used by the CPS (Wales) and of why the falsification of ‘bad character’ evidence by errant welsh police was a wrongdoing that xxxxxxxxxx appears to knowingly ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.

1. Was it not wrong of the same welsh authority who, alone, had my name removed from the UK’s veterinary register, again fabricate false conviction  in order to give me a ‘hard time’ in G4S HMP Parc, including ‘child abuse,’ ABH, firearms and narcotics?

Yours

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

HM Crown Prosecution Service (England)

Dear Mr Evans,

I will have had to attend my Taunton hospital, GP’s surgery and special clinics at least five times this week all because the welsh judiciary criminal conduct. G4S run Park Prison, in Bridgend, South Wales, failed to prescribe to me my daily need of Omeprazole following a spectacular flying accident training for a James Bond film.

I suggest you English Crown Court barristers and solicitors have strayed away from what was relevant and why I have been incarcerated in welsh prisons for around five years of my life and why a van load of welsh coppers travelled, in 2002, to my Royal College of Veterinary surgeons’ disciplinary enquiry to lie through their teeth for a few days in order to curtail my income to fight their inherent deceit.

That failed so I was unlawfully sectioned under s35 of 1968 Mental Health Act, in 2009 , with full support from ten welsh judges and locked up in Caswell Clinic thoroughly terrified for my life. Another police attempt to stop my BS614159 +2 civil damages claims, arising from 40 odd inept failed malicious criminal prosecutions requiring, incidentally, no legal representation and a precious few defence witnesses, required to correctly be expedited.

You know or you ought to know, that the South Wales Police’s 3rd attempt to stop my multimillion pound damages claim fell right into their laps, in 2009, when the Nottinghamshire police had misguidedly handed over my replica dummy Lewis machine-gun, after confiscating it from the new owner, to South Wales Police police officers, in the dead of night, at an M5 Service Station

The devil worshipping Taffia had persuaded the English authorities, including you, despite having arrested and had interviewed the new owners of the dummy gun off my replica DH2 Battle of the the Somme biplane, I flew in the Farnborough air show, that the film prop was a prohibited weapon contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act.

Only this month the welsh police have had to, despite my eleven years of court applications for disclosure in the corrupt Cardiff criminal and civil so called courts of law, finally release twenty odd files of critical prosecution evidence that should have been served on me in Cardiff prison before the 2010 equally ridiculous ‘trading in machine gun’ jury trial.

Eight of the jury in a Cardiff pub told us afterwards that it was obvious to them there had been a police plant amongst them and my cross examination of prosecution witnesses, by the third, second day of evidence, I had been ‘stitched-up.’

It now appears the welsh police, on snatching the film prop from the English authorities, whipped it straight back to Bridgend HQ and disposed of the blocked ‘barrel’ in exchange for an already condemned 0.410 single shot gun barrel found around the police armoury there. the welsh police and also had painted the film prop back to black as the colour, when I had been in possession of it as a harmless piece of scrap iron BUT to fool the jury.

So, Mr Evans of CPS HQ, Rupert Street, Bristol, it must be of no surprise to you and your army of queen square barristers, that John Graham Esq, having had to resort over a year of procrastination by your colleagues, to finally write to and make boyo HM Minister of Justice, Robert Buckland, to ordering the release of my letter to him, allegedly sent by me in May 2019, believed to be stuffed with heroin or was it anthrax, I forget what the august 2019 interrogating police in HMP Parc told me.

No one will give me a useable CD copy of that welsh police August 2019 interrogation, under caution or sight even of my letter to JG or Alun Cairns MP, when asking for help, for fear of internet publicity, as the Police QC, Lloyd Williams, stressed in the last machine gun civil claim hearing due ,again, incourt on the 18th December 2020 at Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre

[Lunch on me, as usual]

But I wrote to Mr Graham’s MP, Mr Burn, in Bournemouth from my welsh prison about the South Wales Police bullying but the prison staff stopped some of those letters as well. I ask you, HM Prosecutor, for copy of them, along with John Graham’s letter from me, as is my right under CPR.

My 18th December 2020 Cardiff County Court 1CF03361′ machine gun damages claim hearing needs the public gallery stuffed full as it is the only way left, apart from PLAN J, of course, in order that I get appropriate compensation from a near three decades of welsh police and welsh law courts flagrant criminality.

In a secret Cardiff Crown Court , on 2nd December 2009, a police blackmailed quite unqualified welsh doctor tendered to the presiding judge, in my absence, when not represented, a fictitious account of how I had ‘irreversible brain damage’, to be MAPPA level 3 Category 3 partly due to my having ditched in the Caribbean and been a long term drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed Esq

I offer, again, in agreeing in some appropriate restraining order under s5 of the 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act if you agree to cause immediate recovery of my welsh prison medical records so desperately needed RIGHT NOW, my wheelchair, my clothes and my shoes, my Caswell Clinic records and why the G4S robbery was needed?

You know, Mr NC Evans, the South Wales Chief Constable defends my multi -million pound ‘machine gun’ damages claim, in court on the 18th, so this criminal conduct by his officers, in this past two years, will be of no surprise to those who have followed my web sites on welsh police brutality since 1990

[Actually, a series of flying incidents back in the 70s, during my flights to Northern Ireland to ‘flight in duck and geese’ and Enniskillen Harriers Hunt Ball or to see my brother, Michael, resulting in a pushed in roof of a Pembrokeshire police car, Manx kippers spread all over Swansea runway and a Dutchman’s fortunately witnessing welsh police bullying at Cardiff airport all resulting in an acquittal or ‘offer no evidence’, is the cause of this latest pack of lies, Mr Evans , from the welshing inherently deceitful that, sadly, still dominate the Welsh so called ‘authorities’.

So, Mr Crown Prosecutor, what are your statutory duties, as laid down laid down by Criminal Procedural Rules because the welsh courts ‘do not give a damn’ about the ‘rule of law’ if it decisions may cause political embarrassment to to their own county folk?

I contacted the Avon and Somerset Police, to no avail of course, to have sight, at least, of my letters to MPs, including Mr Burns and and Alun Cairns and mine, allegedly, to J Graham Esq, all used to have me gaoled for most of last year, without a conviction.

But the welsh bstds will not even disclose all of those to you, will they? I might be advised to suggest that those entangled in this welsh filth of avarice and spite, from cross the river, first check the data from those in Bridgend police HQ as authentic?

Blue skies

John Graham Esq has written again to Robert Buckland QC trying to get back his prison correspondence I had him from various welsh prisons, allegedly full of ‘anthrax’ spores, heroin or some white powder smelling remarkably like tooth paste.

I also have been trying to obtain, for over a year, my G4S prison stolen medical records back together with my wheelchair and legal papers relating to my current two million pound damages claims, case numbers , BS614159, 1CF03361 and a few more.

I have sought help from my Devon MP, whilst in Covid 19 isolation but Ms Selaine Saxby’s letter’s to the welsh authorities are also ignored, of course, with John’s alleged letter now, I am told was seized by the vindictive South Wales Police in May 2019 to unlawfully fabricate the successful excuse that I be incarcerated in Exeter prison for the ‘rest of the that year.

So, I have written again to my local Taunton police who appear to be struggling in understanding why the clear level of ‘animus’, deceit and malice against old harmless me, continues to drift south across the River Severn?

FAO

Duty Officer @ Police Station

Taunton Somerset

25^th November 2020

Dear Sir,                     

South Wales Police Perversion of Justice

Further to my  conversation today with PC Mark Jones of the South Wales Police Professional Standards Department , re my complaint over a strange ‘white powder’ being sent to HM Secretary of State for Wales, then Alun Cairns MP, from my Cardiff prison cell together with, allegedly, a similar letter to John Graham Esq, also believed to be stuffed with heroin, I update re my complaint.

1. John Graham Esq is refused my letter to him and the welsh police and prison authorities continue to ignore both his and my FOI and Data Protection Act applications.
2. n a few days G4S, who had me seriously bullied in HMP Parc, Bridgend, as a convicted paedophile, have but a few days left to file some semblance of a defence in my half million pound damages claim for the injury they did to me, last year, when spreading false criminal convictions around the 800 odd prisoners that I had for child abuse, firearms and narcotics.
3. am now in possession of a copy of a South Wales Police application for an exhibit ARH/1, from my 2010 Cardiff Crown court trial, described by the prosecution in its MG3 address to the Cardiff Crown Court jury, by police female under-over agent, code name ‘Foxy’, describing it as a Lewis Machine-gun with ammunition. She, incidentally, became a ‘he’ when he gave evidence about nine months and a week after her conversation with both Mrs Kirk and myself when expressing a wish to buy it.
4. prosecution exhibit was described by your counterpart’s HQ, in Bridgend, as a lethal barrelled firearm capable of firing more than one round of ammunition from a single pressure on the trigger while the asking the presiding judge for the mandatory 10 year prison term, five for ‘possession’ and five or the selling of what was at most, with a stretch of a vivid imagination,  a single shot .410 shot gun!
5. My one million-pound BS614159 +2 civil damages claim, arising from 40 odd lost South Wales Police malicious criminal prosecutions, was listed for a two-month substantive hearing in January 2010 and, at all costs, had to be stopped. Evidence was scheduled to be taken from around 300 witnesses, nearly all comprising of serving police or retired police officers.
6. When its machine-gun prosecution went ‘pear-shaped in May 2009, following my complaint taken to HRH The Price of Wales, at Highgrove, about the extreme and unusual level of corruption found in both the local police force and the Cardiff law courts, implicating both CPS and its judges, the police , instead, had me sectioned under the 1983  Mental Health Act.
7. While investigating officers .ordered to film my cashe of machine gun rounds in my office and film the forensic stripping examination of the alleged machine-gun the police refuse, contrary to numerous judge’s orders……..
9. to be continued                ““““““`

Statement of Maurice John Kirk: To whom it may concern

and that includes you, Robert Buckland, HM Minister of Justice

‘Unfortunate Collateral Collusion‘ – LAW IN ACTION BBC4 tonight

That is what the welsh police fooled you lot with in England?

A ‘human under cover intelligent force’ HM House of Lords considers next week.

Mr Robert Buckland, from the heart of welsh incestuous judicial inherent deceit,

Please consider, may I suggest,

You chose to not to assist John Graham Esq in having his letter back, of course, snatched by HMP Parc’s G4S badly bullyingly prison, a copy of it stolen by robbery from me on 1stNov 2019, for the South Wales Police. I had purportedly sent to him it from Cardiff prison, in May 2019, laced with 100% pure heroin, prison officers thought. .

Purportedly sprinkled in ‘white powder’, contrary to 2002 Prevention of Terrorism Act, Taunton Crown Court was told, just across road from me! Dear God, give me strength

What utter nonsense you welsh lawyer bstd. I was gaoled for it , despite un-convicted!

Barrister Robin Shellard, of Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, a personal friend of yours, ever since, in various English hood-winked Crown Courts, as HM Crown Prosecutor, has repeatedly promised me, lying againor far more likely, bamboozled by South Wales Police inherent deceit.

l will get John Graham’s letter back along with my HM Secretary of State for Wales’ letter, my local MP for almost 10 years, Alun Cairns MP, succeeding an equally diligent John Smith MP to ‘help’ constituency members.

So, where is it, Mr Robert Buckland?

John, a demonstration in Whitehall appears appropriate ?

Robin Shellard,? Do you or your HM Prosecutor, Mr NC Evans, of Bristol’s HM Crown Prosecution Service office welsh designated , in 2009, to cover -up the welsh police machine gun conspiracy, know where my letters are, key prosecution exhibits, my letters, simply asking for help?

If Mr Graham cannot get back my allegedly sent Cardiff prison letter to him, that had me gaoled in Exeter prison for so many weeks, YOU idiots or are you, to drop the criminal charge against me for sending it, despite my Exeter Crown Court voracious expletives wishing to the contrary, are the Welsh Authorities, who started this vendetta nearly three decades ago, by having me struck off as a veterinary surgeon and destroying my family life, going to be allowed to get away with it, yet again?

Dream on, you ‘jobs for life’ dreamers, I am still breathing and I have not even changed up to 2nd gear, yet.

Has not the real welsh reason dawned on you , Mr Buckland and your side kick, fellow barrister, Robin Shellard, why the South Wales Police had. yet again, fabricated the whole bl..dy nonsense in the first place.

After my last eleven years, with five of them in welsh prisons, the South Wales Police conspiracy of my ‘trading in machine guns’, in order to stop my BS614159 civil claim arising from the chief constable having lost over 40 odd maliciously brought criminal prosecutions. it is finally blown apart.

I am, at last, in possession of 20 odd arch lever police files of which many were illegally police/Dolmans withheld from my February 2010 jury trial facing a mandatory 10 year prison term.

SUMMARY

Upon my incarceration in Caswell Clinic in July 2009 in an attempt to avoid the ‘machine-gun trial, as by 23rd June 2009 Nottinghamshire police had already examined the replica, after taking statements from the new owners, the Coopers, to confirm it was pieces of water pipe and plumber’s scrap put together as a make believe Battle of the Somme Lewis Machine Gun.

I invite readers of this website, from all around the world, to stimulate my ideas as to what I do with this horde of welsh police/Dolmans criminal conduct bearing in mind , as I quote Voltairam yet again:

‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right’

All this was withheld from me while smouldering in my Cardiff prison cell. for nearly eight months, until the Cardiff Crown Court farcical hearing ( see full transcript illegally withheld from me for over 10years despite having paid a string of corrupt solicitors, in advance, to grab it before it was shredded like my RCJ’s RCVS tapes of John Thomas LCJ admitting the multiple errors, at last, of my veterinary college’s hearing dependant on south Wales Police voracity or complete lack of it!

The ‘gun’ was videoed, as stripped down by ‘gun’ expert Huxtable at police HQ, to find thieves had ‘raided the larder’ before him. The inside of the replica Lewis was empty, of course, purloined years earlier due to the weapons WW1 parts value, to build a second but working Lewis this time, were nnever in my ‘possession’ The mere weight of it was a give away.

The South Wales Police , in desperation, therefore switched its senior officer MAPPA level 3 category 3 committee conspiracy, on 7th August 2009 and blackmailed their doctor for ‘sexual indiscretions in Caswell Clinic with Dr Roger Thomas as one of the ring leaders.

Caswell clinic staff, with judge Richard Thomlow, then the bent HM Crown Prosecutor, had a secret hearing with a certain Crown Court judge , without my knowing of it, until 2020, to have me locked away in Ashworth high security psychiatric prison for life.

Note the welsh police waited until 13th July 2009 before recording it was going to ‘examine’ Exhibit ARH 1

Deliberate lies to deliberately cover- up, first by the South Wales Police and then Adrian Oliver of Dolmams , solicitors, defending the Chief Constable, ‘shoot to kill’ Barbara Wilding, in order to stop my 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecution 1CF03361+2 damages claim , requiring well in excess of 200 witnesses, nearly all police officers

The sheer spite and greed in Adrian Oliver, senior partner of Dolmans, manifests itself time and time again in these last new thirty years, that he was actually present at my 18th June 2009 impromptu visit to police HQ, Bridgend with my ‘witness statements’ for ‘mutual ‘exchange’ clearly tucked under my arm’ is revealed.

Only this week, with my having to spend many hundreds of pounds having the recently acquired withheld police files scanned, again, as the court had heard, he and his QC, Lloyd Williams, feared if I ever laid my hands on this vast treasure trove of police/lawyer deceit, as all implicated are immune to prosecution , of course, by not simply emailing me the 20 odd arch leaver files it would frustrate my prosecution by even more months.

Now and lest we forget, only due to a cock-up for Judge Keiser’s absence from court in October had ‘triggered’ this discovery that now needs and English police force to cause a criminal investigation,

Lloyd Williams QC in on the act back in 2000 in Bristol County Court

Andrew Keiser QC , the HHJ Beard QC court had heard this Summer, from leading police counsel , had already decided to be the jury trial judge and had already fixed my machine gun damages claim, ‘behind closed doors’.

Barrister Lloyd Williams told the startled new judge, clearly unaware of the daily level of deceit, to expect, metered out in welsh law courts, was going to be no jury and Keiser will dispose of the 200 odd witnesses within no more than five days!

“Are you gentlemen looking for machine-guns, by any chance, as Jacques and I were surrounded at Bridgend’s South Wales Police HQ, by armed police in tin hats and sporting flak jackets and stun grenades?”

Readers, I am only on the first 100 odd pages in these approximate 3000 pages of police conspiracy withheld relevant documentation, from my bemused jury, including key eye witness MG 11 statements taken down before the January 2010 trial, number T20097445 had even started.

All 10 years too late for my two million pound civil damages claim, Case number BS614169 +2, delayed, of course, by most senior judge of the welsh courts, Seys Llewellyn QC (quaintly corrupt).

Seys Llewellyn , after his ridiculous BS case judgement, had deliberately waited 16 months, no less, before the the law could be changed for a mere Englishman was no longer able to appeal it to HM Royal Courts of Justice,

Clever was he not? Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had waited until his day of retirement to simply ‘seal’ his court order’ in order for HM Criminal Court of Appeal, in law be allowed to hear it BUT now only in the same incestuous court in the Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre ..

Meantime, Luigi Stranati, court manager, if not caught red handed emptying my 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates court room of chairs to prevent my followers, like Sabine MacNeill and 20 others being allowed into the clandestine despicably run hearing, to witness my cooked-up ‘restraining order’ conviction, he takes it upon himself , then as Wales regional manger , to ban my entry yo yhe public counter for 10 years.

Why, you may well ask, to prevent my obtaining the transcript of BS614159 +2 civil claims, in order to appeal it or the copy of the court log notorious in my decades suffering under the stench of welsh civil and criminal court rooms .

All refused to this day, of course.

My diagnosed history is ‘highly complex, convoluted and difficult to understand’. ‘The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties (poor writing and spelling)’ I, apparently, ‘developed a personality characterised by ‘narcissism (an abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to me) and paranoia (believing I am the victim of persecution). I also show evidence of poor judgement.

‘impulsivity and a willingness to hold myself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment’. [I have never lost a hunger strike] Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed my life and probably had a negative affect on my social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout my life.

However, as for myself and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years both my functioning has deteriorated and that my beliefs have ” become more intense and overwhelming and at sometimes, though not others, are clearly abnormal. I now show clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes.

Brain scans both before this ‘opinion’, in Texas, England and Wales and after, in France and Wales, identified no damage beyond the normal aging parameters. Where is the evidence of alcohol abuse other than having been, briefly, a drinking partner of my dear old friend, actor, Oliver Reed?

‘Deceleration’ injuries, as being a possible factor, is totally fabricated to justify quite unqualified Professor Rodger Wood using me as a human guinea pig, in Caswell Clinic for SPEC brain scans in August 2009, requiring intravenous radio isotopes into my brain.
I have experienced significant hearing difficulties ever since.

The specific area of brain damage affects my ability to monitor and control my behaviour, decreases self-awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded my paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, my beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of a paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature).
Poor judgment, alright, in my believing normal standards within the local law courts and local police force would be on a par to those in England!

‘ Welsh Authority’ is reliant on the doctor’s premise that I suffer misbelief in what the South Wales Police has done to me and my family.

With regard to treatment, neither my underlying personality nor brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of my clearly abnormal beliefs (as opposed to my general paranoid view of the world) it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, though it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication, apparently, has been offered which I have refused.

The relative safety of Cardiff prison within that s35 three-month horror, as a ‘human guinea pig’ for couple of ignorant clinicians to play games, cannot be expunged from my mind.

Clinically it is unclear whether my brain damage is likely to progress. Should it do so my difficulties will become more marked and I will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.

With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is also impossible to consider my risk in isolation from those who I may encourage to act on my behalf.

Where is the proof of this police doctor’s ‘mumbo jumbo’? What was the ‘appropriate’ medication?

My remedy is very simple, the Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary stops the campaign of police bullying and deceit or stop losing cases in your own police courts.

‘The risk of my continuing with my actions against South Wales Police and acting in a way that I feel justified to achieve my ends is high’, though whether I myself would be involved in inter-personal violence is less, is cannot be discounted. I am also told nor can the risk that others would act violently without my encouragement. If my condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase.
It cannot be discounted I may, someday without help from my MP, fall under a bus, the prize idiot.

If this Caswell Clinic diagnosis is true then the validity of my five years in Welsh prisons must be in doubt.

I therefore, in the absence of help, change my plea to that of insanity,


Signed



Date 16th November 2020

FAO HM Prosecutor,

13^th Nov 2020

(By hand)

Dear Sir/Madam,

South Wales Police fraud

I wish to make an application at your earliest available court for an outside police force to investigate as to why neither the South Wales Police and now, nor will the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigate fraud.

Clerk to HM Crown Court

The Shire Hall

 Taunton

Somerset TA1 4EU

13^th Nov 2020

(By hand)

Dear Sir/Madam,

South Wales Police fraud

I wish to make an application at your earliest available court for an outside police force to investigate as to why neither the South Wales Police and now, nor will the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigate fraud.

This, again, implicates a number of CPS and Dolmans lawyers and senior police officer in South Wales (see failed disclosure in Exeter Crown court proceedings) and why the violent 1^st Nov 2019 robbery on me by G4S HMP Parc staff was so instructed to purloin my court & medical papers in order obstruct my court claims against them and dep-rive my Taunton GP now a consultant is involved following the prison denying my essential daily Omeprazole.

My written complaints to each police force, both stating my letters to Alun Cairns MP and John Graham were stuffed with heroin or similar substance ,contrary to the 2001 Prevention of Terrorism Act, neither Mr Graham, prosecution witness turned defence witness, nor myself can obtain.

Of these missives we are denied sight of originals or even purported photo copies of either all for one very good reason, The welsh three decades of nefarious conduct is now, at last, starting to fall apart around their ears.

As neither police force, one year on, still will not recover my stolen G4S property or retrieve my  purported two letters  I ask that this, my application, be expedited.

Thankyou,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

 tel 07708586202

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

MY reply from complaint to Independent Office of

JUST HOW MUCH MORE INCESTUOUS CAN THIS COVER-UP GET?

!enquiries	11:30 (53 minutes ago)
to me

Dear Maurice Kirk,

 Thank you for contacting the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). We acknowledge the details of your complaint against South Wales Police. The IOPC case reference number is 2020/145308. Please use this if you contact us regarding this matter. 

We are completely independent of the police service and are responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly. Our role at this stage is to forward your complaint to the relevant police force, which must decide whether to record the complaint.

Recording means that a record is made of the complaint giving it formal status as a complaint under the Police Reform Act 2002. I have therefore passed the matter to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of South Wales Police.

 Please contact them directly if you have not had a response from them using the details below: South Wales PoliceProfessional Standards DepartmentTy Richard ThomasNewlands AvenueBrackla Industrial EstateBridgendCF31 2DATel: 01656 655 555Email: Professional.standards@South-Wales.pnn.police.uk If you have any further information you wish to pass on, please forward it directly to the PSD using the above details.

 You should, usually, hear from the PSD within 15 working days. However, given the current corona virus (Covid-19) pandemic it may take longer for the PSD to be in contact.  Yours sincerely, 

 James BromleyCustomer Contact Advisor
Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
PO Box 473
Sale
M33 0BW  Email: enquiries@policeconduct.gov.ukWebsite: www.policeconduct.gov.uk Follow us on twitter @policeconductFind out how we handle your personal data How satisfied were you with your experience with the IOPC’s Customer Contact Centre? Let us know by taking this short survey.All information will be treated in accordance with the Data Protection Act. Os bydd arnoch angen yr arolwg hwn yn Gymraeg, cysylltwch â ni ar userfeedback@policeconduct.gov.uk os gwelwch yn dda.  This message and its content may contain confidential, privileged or copyright information. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, you must not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action which relies on the contents. Instead, please inform the sender and then permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the IOPC. Only specified staff are authorised to make binding agreements on behalf of the IOPC by email. The IOPC accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The IOPC cannot guarantee the security of this email or any attachments. While emails are regularly scanned, the IOPC cannot take any liability for any virus that may be transmitted with the internet. The IOPC communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and or attachments may be read by monitoring staff….

Dear Mr Stellard,

Is it the 4th or 5th occasion that I have heard from you and counterparts, in your absence, assure me that the South Wales Police will disclose to you my original letter to JOHN GRAHAM Esq, from Cardiff prison and my one to alun Cairns MP.

But you very well know the South Wales Police and G4S are congenital liars, proven so many times in the past.

I will be seeking an urgent application at my nearest HM Crown Court, Taunton’s across the road, for and outside police force to be called in to investigate on how the South Wales Police have, yet again, hood-winked English authorities, this time, the Avon & Somerset Constabulary and HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) ,meaning you

Prison staff, you must have been made aware of by now, told me that the ‘white powder’, regularly found in my outgoing mail, was assumed to be the heroin that I had routinely been supplying my Vale of Glamorgan member of parliament, Alun Cairns MP. The ‘white powder’, stinking remarkably of prison issue toothpaste’ appears to have put me in no alternative position but to obtain a witness statement for my next court application ,shortly. from Alun Cairns MP.

Were we go again, this time English lawyers cashing in on their immunity to prosecution when employed by bent Welsh clients like some of those in the South Wales judiciary I have encountered over the last near thirty years.

I was forced to explain, publically, to HM Recorder of Exeter Crown Court,that the South Wales Police , with malice aforethought, covered up Alun Cairns MP’s involvement in my being accused of running a thriving business in the narcotics trade from my F block psychiatric wing of HMP Cardiff

rough draft

1. Between a day  in May 2019  and June 2019 G4S staff at HMP Cardiff conducted a 32 minute cell search,with drug sniffer dogs, in the absence of the occupant, Maurice Kirk.

 2.  My Kirk who was locked, throughout the search, in the shower room in  his wheelchair.

3.  This prisoner’s correspondence was taken from his F block cell and possibly along with his  BS614159 and 1CF03361 civil claim papers during his time locked in the shower

4.  Both civil claims resulted from South Wales Police’s  40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions and the notorious Maurice ‘trading in machine guns’ acquittal, requiring no defence or summing up , what so ever.

5. Late police disclosure reveals both John Graham’s and then HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP’s letters from Mr Kirk were amongst documents stolen from his cell or in the days shortly after in June 2019 all allegedly containing ‘ an unknown ‘harmless white powder’;6. Late disclosure by way of Mr Kirk’s police interrogation on 1st August 2019 and witness statements by prominent eye witnesses revealed the ‘investigation was still ongoing .

6. On 1st November 2019 Mr Kirk was violently ejected from the prison but G4S refusing to give him any of the contents of his cell , no doubt , handed over to the defendant in the multi-million pound damages claims

7. Mr Kirk wrote to MPs both before and since his 2019 incarceration in HMP Parc but still unable to recover his incriminating property that included his Caswell Clinic medical records sent to the prison by Dr Gaynor Jones

 8. On 1st November 2019 G4S staff handed to the driver of a car, picking up Mr Kirk, a package of Cardiff prison stopped letters , both in or out of  prison with a 2nd bundle of prison stopped letters addressed to or from HMP Parc, Bridgend.

9. John Graham’s ‘stopped’ letters were found in both prison’s letter bundles (containing many 1st class stamps) but no letter, purportedly  from Mr Kirk , with ‘white powder’ the exhibit relied on for the criminal charge that had Mr Kirk imprisoned for a long time until the charge was dropped.

10. Similarly , Mr Kirk’s letters purported to Alun Cairns MP and other MPs with ‘white powder’ could not be found in the returned HMP Parc letter bundles  on the 1st November 2019

JOHN , that was a draft on my personal involvement so, please, to enlighten an outside police force invetigation list audit trail of welsh authorities putting up two fingers to0 your FOI and Data Protection Act requests.

Thankyou

https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=16385&action=edit

My current website, mauricejohnkirk.com  reminds you that G4S, at HMP Parc, was clearly immune to prosecution when robbing me for the machine gun papers for South Wales Police’s defending my various multi million pound damages claims for their 40  odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions, including  my ‘trading in machine-guns’ blown conspiracy.

Tomorrow, with the  CPS and South Wales Police refusing to disclose its court prosecution exhibits that forced their dropping the proposed charge, I have been supplying  HM  Secretary of State for Wales with raw undiluted suspect heroin, to John Graham, by mutual consent and to another MP I cannot not name.

(this is only a sound bite precis of the hidden welsh prison records that I am asking you to obtain for our presiding judge.

Mr Stellard , your barrister colleague, Mr Christopher Smythe, one of my proposed witnesses in my action again the South Wales’ judicial authorities, will be only too willing to confirm to you and judge Johnson, I have no doubt , he never found sufficient evidence that I had ever been ‘served’ a restraining order in a December 201i magistrate cell, in the first place, by a cabal of the Taffia that crowed around my open cell door.

HM Crown Prosecutor Evans, remember, who I had deliberately arrested in the foyer of Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre, in order he tell your Bristol Crown Court, on my cross examination, precisely what I wanted.

EVANS “Yes, it was my 2nd preliminary draft of the Magistrate’s proposed ‘restraining order’ offered to me for negotiation but not accepted by me at the cell door

Remember, Mr Stellard , I was then promptly arrested in the Cardiff magistates and handcuffed in my wheelchair, for not attending the 28th Nov 2011 notorious Nigerian, MUSA family six snatched kids by Haringay Council court hearing.

Why? Because the welsh prison deliberately would not allow me to attend!

The stupid Taunton Magistrate, Ms Williams, fell for it and even referred to that day’s criminal offence, FTA, of not attending a London court, to oppose my bail application,

She sent me, instead, to Exeter gaol, nine years later. This current incident is again appearing to be fraud to be repeated by the lawyers employed by CPS’s Mr Evans,

No wonder the G4S did such serious bullying of me, all last year, as it was protected by the mickey mouse Min of J J /G4S SPV contract to make it difficult for prisoners from claiming for their injuries.

TO 
Ex prisoners, my contact email is maurice@kirkflyigvet.com https://mauricejohnkirk.

Lastly, but far from not least, I wrote to you and waited the statutory time , laid down for your CPS Review of the case. This was triggered in the light of the startling new evidence, I referred to in court, of how the South Wales Police are constantly lying to you, as they do, as to just where are the court exhibits John Graham has been denied? 

Such is the real risk their not keeping their fat state funded pensions I am putting you on notice I am filing a Judicial Review application in the RCJ in HM  Administrative Court without further ado.

If by tomorrow you disclose or give me written assurances that those defence exhibits to which the learned judge considers I am entitled will come to me with the CDs of my two police interviews, under caution, within 10 days then I will turn my ‘guns’ back on the human excrement  I so regularly find in Cardiff court rooms.

thankyou  

—
Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202