Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

Incident site

Video

This travesty of justice led to a private prosecution as it was obvious, while recovering from this unexpected encounter with a bunch of lying bastards from both police, Dolmans and judiciary, that I must expose the ‘welsh way of doing things’ on an unsuspecting visitor to Wales.

By launching a private prosecution would prove the point and soon, sure enough, I had lots of little minded louts, as in Guernsey, seen scurrying around in ever decreasing circle, not unlike the Ouslem bird, desperate to protect their cosy and lucrative life style when clearly answerable to no one.

09 09 09 Barbara Wilding & A Oliver Private Prosecution to Barry Mag (2)

16 12 03 BS audio order

17 0815 Mr Kirk Audio Forensic (1)

17 05 12 Newey J refusal re tape

This eventual release of the South Wales Police interview tape of their victim, in custody and under caution, has taken no less than twenty four years to achieve.

Maurice’s horrific experiences when suddenly thrown in prison, as ‘unidentifiable’ while Guernsey Authorities were considering his extradition quite unbeknown to him, may explain one of the reasons why the 2013 trial judge, His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC, deliberately further delayed this already mysterious release if it into court in the April to do nothing until almost to the day of his retirement.

Meanwhile Maurice is not just refused the right to buy the 100 odd witness trial transcript for his appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice but access to the court log and exhibits originally lodged with the court.

It may surprise no one, now, to know that His Honour’s ‘order’ continued to remain dormant on the dusty shelves of Cardiff’s notorious ‘Civil Justice’ Centre until July 2017 without it going for any forensic analysis, as ordered in the previous year as all are just waiting for Maurice to die.

‘And now for something completely the same’……the power of ‘devil worship’ in our Christian community.

.

His Honour sat on my machine-gun damages claim for seven years, why?

Only premeditated by Barbara Wilding, this malicious hopeless from the start malicious prosecution? No chance, simply to interfere with our civil court proceedings, yes was, of course, her motive in fear of losing her pension.

‘Dark forces’ took control that night the moment PC Phyl Thomas, now a sergeant and a damned good I would bet, made contact with that notorious corrupt channel island.

His Honour delayed the forensic examination of the ‘tape’ for  a year, why? Bloody obvious.

RING this number 07708586202 and I will tell you why or email maurice@kirkflyingvet.com but your laptop may smoke a little.

‘The tape’ content, to be published later, reveals another side to the incident deliberately withheld that the masonics knew all about hoping this tape may never be ‘found’ or eye witnesses eventually could be traced.

[ Has some grandson or granddaughter  of one of my old Cardiff or Vale of Glamorgan  veterinary clients ‘slipped’ this controversial tape my way for saving their mother or grand mother’s cat after being scraped off the road at 3 in the morning?  That’s the usual reason for my accumulation of leaked sensitive  police and court docs have taken’]

What actually happened was a passing police officer came to the apparent aid of another he may have believed, at that moment in time, was being assaulted by Maurice in order to resist arrest, arrest, it turned out twenty four years later, for the theft of his own BMW motor bike. The contents of both bike panniers, their prisoner’s pockets and information from a crowd of angry waiting clients, outside his veterinary surgery, were all ignored as the police soon had their own agenda.

Their prisoner’s copy of the police tape was deliberately withheld from him as he had now been charged with an indictable offence, that of ‘being found in possession of an offensive weapon’.

Further detail currently blocked at the Royal Courts of Justice for obvious reasons:

AA Action 1 claim 8.6, 20 May 1993 arrest at Grand Avenue Cardiff.

Barrimore ParkervChiefConEssexPressSummary

18th August 2017

The Lying Bunch of Evil Bastards lied to Professor Nick Hardwick who was not told by HMP Swansea that South Wales Police had ordered my denial of two urgent hospital appointments and access to the high court whilst unrepresented  and trying to cover it up by the  blocking of  my prison wing telephone communications with key Mackenzie Friends, including Sabine McNeil, herself now Subject to a restraining order. Witnesses for pending civil and criminal courts arising from 25 years of welsh police persecution of plain bullying were also denied communication during my prison periods simply designed to blackmailing me into using a lawyer.

Professor Nick Hardwick

UK’s HM Parole Board Chairman

Victims Unite Queen Bee

Unlawfully gagged Sabine McNeil, another victim of 1997 Blair badly drafted Prevention of Harassment Act just for the wife and others to coin in the easy tax payer’s money

14 10 07 P 10 HM Prison Inspectorate Redacted Complaint List

14 10 07 P4 HMPrisons Inspectorate Complaint List Part 2

14 10 08 P12 HMPrisoc ns Inspectorate Part 3

14 10 15 P12 HM Prisons Inspectorate Part 4

14 10 15 P12 BS Position Statement Part 5

17 07 12 Parole Futher Particulars Pt1 

InvokerServlet

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 11:41 AM

Subject: Fw: Psychiatric report on Maurice Kirk by Dr Tegwyn Williams

Nelson:

This Maurice Kirk is yet another who seeks justice against a specific case of blatant judicial corruption in Britain. <SNIP> Here is the sinister report by a State psychiatrist being used to silence him.

Chris

—– Forwarded Message —- From: To: Various.

Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 4:07:49 AM Subject: RE: Psychiatric report on Maurice Kirk by Dr Tegwyn Williams

AN EXTRACT FROM THE PSYCHIATRIST’S REPORT ON MAURICE KIRK.

LEGAL.

“Paragraph 32. Maurice Kirk’s history is complex, convoluted and difficult to understand. The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties, (poor writing and spelling).. He developed a personality characterised by narcissism (abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to him) and paranoia (believing he is the victim of persecution). He also shows evidence of poor judgement, impetuosity and a willingness to hold himself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment. Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed Maurice Kirk’s life, and probably had a negative effect on his social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout his life. However, Maurice Kirk and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years his functioning has deteriorated and that his beliefs have become more intense and that his beliefs have become more intense and overwhelming and at times, to no others, and purely act normal. Maurice Kirk now shows clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes. The specific area of brain damage affects his ability to monitor and control his behaviour, decreases self awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded his paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, his beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature).

“Paragraph 33. With regard to treatment neither Maurice Kirk’s underlying personalities or brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of his clearly abnormal beliefs, as opposed to his general paranoid view of the world, it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, tough it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication has been offered to Maurice Kirk which he has refused.

“Paragraph 34. Clinically it is unclear whether Maurice Kirk’s brain damage is likely to progress. Should it be so his difficulties will become more marked and he will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.

“Paragraph 35. With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is almost impossible to consider Maurice Kirk’s risk in isolation from those he encourages to act on his behalf. The risk of Maurice Kirk continuing his action against South Wales Police and acting in a way that he feels justified to achieve his ends is high, but whether Maurice Kirk himself would be involved in inter personal violence is less, it cannot be discounted nor is the risk that others would act violently with his encouragement. If Maurice Kirk’s condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase over time.”

CLINICAL.

“Paragraph 36. I have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of the plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk’s mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self awareness, judgement, decision making, self regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty in organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence.”

“Paragraph 37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court, I would consider him a fit person to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant features.

“Paragraph 38. Maurice Kirk’s current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the criminal justice system, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with mental health services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.

“Paragraph 39. I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulties for the court.. I am also aware of the difficulties that the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk’s perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk request in patient hospital treatment. I have concerns that a medium secure unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff, because of the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a high security hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of specific security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk’s communications with the encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.

“Paragraph 40.

Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit.”

By 13th August 2017 Maurice had now spent over three years in prison from these MAPPA category 3 level 3 concocted lies. These concocted lies had been the result  of Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable, having had to sign her false 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit if she was to save her pension.

Her fairy tale affidavit  stated that Maurice had received all the relevant disclosure of police records relating to her thirty three failed malicious prosecutions against him.

The South Wales Police similarly fabricated 2009 MAPPA Maurice Kirk medical records, to avoid the already doomed machine-gun trial that was all before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC on 2nd December 2009. These medical records continue to be withheld from their victim for fear of civil redress for substantial damages finishing up in The Royal Courts of Justice.

The Cardiff courts now, owing to some  of these medical records having been written without even examining their purported patient or written without appropriate qualifications, even caused the perversion of justice even at the Criminal Court of Appeal before Lord Justice Leverson and Mr Justice Males.

13 RO RCJ Appeal Page 1

RO RCJ Appeal Page 2

13 03 RO ECJ appeal Page 3

Blackmailed Dr Tegwyn Williams’ Maurice Kirk Caswell clinic medical  report

09 10 23 US Psychiatrist e-mail

Cardiff Crown Court deliberately misled their Lordships on their visit to sit in the welsh court by withholding  the part of the transcript recording when the jury handed the trial judge a ‘jury note’ in order to cover up the clerk, Michael Williams, immune to to prosecution as on the HM job for life’ payroll.

The jury specifically asked for sight of the recording of both the service of 1st December 2011 restraining order and also that Maurice  had been taken back to the prison due to severe rectal bleeding. ( damage resulting from the cache of essential legal papers stored per rectum due to successive corrupt Cardiff Crown court judges refusing my legal papers in court in the hope I may employ a local layer.

Cardiff courts are renowned for not just having police ‘plants’ on the jury, as in the 2012  collapsed machine-gun jury trial, as eleven of the jury were so convinced about but also bent defence teams being ‘leaned on’, for a favour or otherwise to slip any sensitive material to the prosecution. Their purpose is to warn and therefore avoid the exposure of either in their ‘gravy train’ scam, at tax payer’s expense, a police officer caught lying in the witness box or lawyer in the well of the court also doing what he was trained for.

Only this month in Isleworth Crown, London, in R v S Oraki & R Oraki, I watched this game of theirs being acted with three bent police officers, Nash, Harding and Furneaux, before Judge Hill-Smith QC, clearly protected from imprisonment.  All said, on oath, the rim of the wheel was no more than a centimetre from the road surface despite video, taken with other police present, proved no defect on the rear tyre, what so ever.

Its known as ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’, daily and why our corrupt judicial processes, as above must gain a Brexit or their tax payer funded ‘gravy train ‘ will de-rail.

Returning to the stench of a Cardiff court room, Maurice was also deliberately denied the sight of a ‘jury note’ because of it’s incriminating content……note the cctv reference…..Maurice was specifically videoed 24/7 as a MAPPA 3/3 police victim .

Remember, Cardiff magistrates had deliberately never served the 1st December 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams restraining order in the first place in order to have Maurice gaoled for 9 months for ‘breaching’ it.

A constantly repeated manoeuvre from Cardiff cabal’s thick book of dirty tricks is to cover up their original 1993 police conspiracy in order to have Maurice extradited back to Guernsey. That damages claim is only now with Cardiff’s corrupt county court, 23 years later, which quickly confiscated the reel to reel tape when Maurice was found to be in the position, now, to play his police interview tape that never carried a prisoner caution for their dreamed up ‘indictable offence’.

Maurice had been locked up for being in possession of ‘a garrotte type’ instrument jused used on HRH Prince Charles’ farm.

Cardiff Court clerk with my confiscated property

To await Channel Islands extradition police lied to the May 1993 court, keeping him in prison for four days, by saying, “Kirk cannot be identified” despite being arrested right out side his veterinary surgery with clients complaining!

Numerous Cardiff civil and criminal judges have deliberately covered up this conspiracy,  ever since, when it only needed one to ‘come clean’

The Cardiff judge who buried my ‘tape’

This little ‘shit’, Judge Richard Thomlow, was the then bent HM Crown Prosecutor in the 2010 police concocted machine-gun jury trial. We watched him before the very amused, by then, jury while he frantically tried to hide the DH2 Farnborough flown aircraft’s log books under his court papers, on his desk,for know one to see immediately following my ‘gently touched on’ simple fact of the decommissioned WW1 Lewis machine gun being a lawful possession.

In 1997 Viv Bellamy, who married Mr Fairy’s daughter, also an old friend in those days, had decommissioned no less than five at the same time now on WW1 aircraft and at the time of the trial, one being even on a Sopwith in RAF museum Hendon. to add to the evilness in South Wales against the English even nine in the pub afterwards (for their £1000 each) remarked that 11 of the jury’s decisions were made up on the first day of evidence once four police officers had been cross examined and they heard, wait for or it, both the Dorset museum owner, who sold the aircraft and the museum owner in Lincoln, that bought her, were not locked up but would be ‘prosecution witnesses’

The ‘icing on the cake’, if further proof of the Cardiff cabal’s conduct against an Englishman was really needed, was when they used a male police officer behind a screen, for jury identity only, called ‘Foxy’  pretending to have been the female police officer who had telephoned both my then wife and myself when ‘attempting to by the relic.

Police, incidentally, had painted the gun all black for trial as I had owned her but the buyer, before trial, had painted her part grey. Police could not even get the right shade of grey back on her , all at Lincoln hangar laughed as they told me, when the gun had to be returned by the police having failed to goal me of the compulsory 10 years.

Post Brexit will allow this conduct to spread the length and breadth of the UK, mark my words, as there will be no proper protection from ECHR.

Apart from lying to judge Bidder QC, in that my brain was so damaged by a possible tumour, it had given his bitch chief constable the right, by armed helicopter on 20th June 2009, to raid our house with twenty odd police and snatch our 10 ten year old to be taken into care by the Country council……..anything to disrupt the civil damages claim against them for over sixty odd failed malicious prosecutions

Retired Chief Constable

Recently this conduct was crowned by the obviously HM ‘leaned on’ Recorder of Cardiff by her siding with the original 2012 bent trial and appeal judges, His Honour Judge John Curran, when ruling the jury note was not relevant and ‘harassment appeal judge, His Honour Judge Hughes, refusing obviously needed police, prison, Geoamey and court records disclosure in that no restraining order could have been in existence at the time both clerk of the court and goal manager stated the time service; took place,

The Recorder of Cardiff HHJ Eleri Rees

HHJ Hughes QC

As with Curran he also allowed my access to my witnesses or legal papers to be in court for the 1st March 2012 ‘harassment ‘ appeal when even my main witness on crutches was attacked by Dr Tegwyn Williams’ wife, anything to cover up the multiple conspiracy acted out in her Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison where , for three months, Maurice had never been so terrified and for so long.

Bloody Liar Judge John Curran caught on tape in my 1st jury trial, on 4th May 2012, after all having been subjected to the lies of the clerk of the court that, in the 1st Dec 2009 harassment trial, he saw the final version served in the corridor totally contradicting the evidence from The similar bloody liar, Geoamey custody manger Lee Barker, telling the jury he served the final restraining order in my cell!

That could not have been even typed at that time of day if we believe the evidence of the bent CPS barrister David Gareth Evans from the witness box in Bristol’s Crown Court three years later.  He said it had been  his part hand written restraining order taken to my cell for consultation as is always the case in ‘restraining orders’.

So what on earth were Their Lordships given in paperwork, in my 14th March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal application, to deliberate upon if not knowing the jury, not only asked the obvious in writing but that they were lied to just as they were in my  machine-gun trial by Judge Paul Thomas and CPE now judge Richard Tomlow and to a jury since.

Founder member’s tie of the notorious Guernsey’s ‘Ragged Dissident Society’ who’s members like Gerald and Yvonne Gillow, Spencer and Janet Gelsthorpe and Paul Griffiths  exposed , so well, the wide spread accepted corruption in the administration from UK’s HM Partnership ultimately responsible for the Bailiwick’s good government.

So what really goes on in our UK law courts, as in  in Wales and not just in a corrupt tax haven where ECHR is not recognised?

FAO

President of the HM Parole Board

14th August 2017

Dear Nick Hardwick,

My Illegal Swansea Prison Incarceration

You may recall we met in HMP Swansea, in 2014, following my correspondence over the South Wales Police illegally ordering the doubling of my prison term as I was deemed, by Barbara Wilding, as a MAPPA level 3 category 3 registered very dangerous person.

My eight month prison sentence,, for breaching a Dr Tegwyn Williams restraining order never served on me, was identical to any IPP (imprisonment for public protection).

My favourite prison’s comment was by the Swansea prison staff  saying that no psychiatrist in South Wales was prepared to sit on my parole board, for instant release, to contradict Dr Tegwyn Williams police and Ministry of Justice prepare whether I could ‘safely’ be returned to society.

Your words on  that BBC program, back in 2014, predicting my destiny rang true.

InvokerServlet

14 09 11 MAPPA blocked Swansea Prison Tel Calls

17 08 16 T20170239 Disclosure and payment appl.

Application for Witness summonses to be issued

Case ref 16th Sept 2017 Cardiff Crown Court  T2017 0239 and counting

Dear clerk of the Cardiff Crown Court ,

Please consider the following:

Case 272 – The Maurice Kirk Story And Somerset Police

This is the amazing story of police deceit and the hounding of ‘the flying vet’ Maurice Kirk, who was thrown about like a ‘punching ball’ from one police force to another, beginning with the antics of the Avon and Somerset Police….see the full story later on this page……”The Strange Case of Maurice Kirk and Police Victimisation”

https://victims-unite.net/2017/08/10/bent-lawyers-and-cops-1264-cases-in-34-stories-of-crimes-and-corruption-mojgovuk-ukhomeoffice/

From: Maurice Kirk [mailto:maurice@kirkflyingvet.com] Sent: 10 August 2017 09:39

More, much more later so come to Cardiff’s Crown Court and witness for yourself their ‘lying culture’ when trying to persecute an Englishman just trying to practice veterinary surgery.

Masonic devil worshipping firm of solicitors also police protected from prosecution, Dolmans solicitors. He is required to give evidence how he hatched with Barbara Wilding  the machine-gun gibberish for my  the sectioning, under 1983 mental Health Act, to Ashworth in order to avoid the embarrassing machine-gun jury trial, doomed from the start, as a failure.

May be that is why Seys Llewelyn QC blocked my one million pound civil damages claim for  aight years and now HHJ H Keiser QC for almost another year knowing it will not be long, now, before I die off and their problem will appear to go away.

Retired now, His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC, as one of the many Cardiff judges (last count was 13?) ‘in the know’ over MAPPA/machine gun/ Dr Tegwyn Williams  ‘snatch’ Gen conspiracy but all too spineless, it would appear,putting it oh so politely, to do anything about it

Late Crown Prosecutor David Gareth Evans who is another ‘spineless example ‘ who simply needed  to confirm , as he did in 2014 Bristol Crown court, I could not have been given a restraining order, as described to the 1st jury, as it had not even been drafted at  that point! He confirmed it was, instead, his typed draft proposal written over by District Judge John Charles’ blue inked fountain pen.

This custody officer, needed as a witness for my defence, was there on 1st December 2011, in the cells, with Lee Barker and there in the dock with me before Her Ladyship, in my recent ‘abuse of process’ application carrying no right of appeal, of course, due to police/court/Geoamey/ HMP/ Justice Ministry rampant corruption which will be far worse if we manage daft Brexit.

The lying little creep Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University, required as a witness, will confirm his Dr Ruth Bagshaw evidence, of Caswell Clinic, report was  false as he simply wanted to also jump on the ‘gravy train’.

ALL EIGHT are  required as defence witnesses

Their June 2009 intended Machine-Gun/MAPPA  victim ‘snatch’

As my ‘character witness’ I am considering Gen’s testimony on growing up without her ‘crazy’ dad, her words not mine, entirely due to the rampant South Wales Police bullying, answerable to no one, reliant on an equally corrupt judiciary driven only by avarice.

Further to my today’s telephone call over my countless applications, including letter of 8thy May 2017 to you, I have still not received the where with all on obtaining witnesses into the witness box relevant for the 12^th September 2017 4^th jury trial on this public scandal that reveals so much accepted lying by officialdom.

I require the names and addresses of those 8+ who here present in the Cardiff Magistrates Court building when a paper or papers, purportedly to be a valid restraining order of same date, was ‘served’ on me in my cell or in corridor (‘while on my crutches’) or found on me following a police search immediately after the incident.

NOTHING was ‘served’ on me while in the building and well you know it except for a pair of handcuffs for my ‘failing to attend’ the Nigerian Musa six children Haringey Council ‘snatch’.

Your court and/or the CPS know the prison had received police orders I was not to be ‘produced’ to the London court due to my not inconsiderable knowledge proving UK’s illegal multiple ‘child snatching’ industry for the cash included that 21st June 2009 abortive attempt with 20 odd South Wales Police with police helicopter, some with automatic weapons, to ‘snatch ‘ our my own 10 year old, Genevieve.

All, again, driven by legal aid fraud so admirably exemplified by the six or so Haringey Council  lawyers, in the Musa scandal, portrayed before Mrs Justice Atkinson to deliberate upon not in the parent’s favour.

Re written botched fabricated court record that the 1st jury trial were denied as it di not exist on 4th May 2012 when both Judge John Curran and CPS prosecutor David Gareth Evans both, lied in the face of the court, all routine stuff in Cardiff courts, refused the jury as being neither ‘available’ nor ‘relevant’!

33 Witness summonses are to include:

1. Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams who will give evidence that the police blackmailed him to fabricate numerous forensic reports about me, recommending me for Ashworth prison, indefinitely due to a brain tumour, will also confirm he fabricated the reason needed for the abortive 2^nd Jury restraining order trial, in  that his civil rebuttal, by Morgan Cole, solicitors, who have all the records on the criminal conduct, ‘that I was caught around at his home, late one night, with cans of petrol but that the police simply moved him on’!
2. Dr Janis Hiliar will support the above evidence and also confirm that the £10,000 counterclaim by her husband was also fraudulent. My then petty debt civil damages claim of £800,  for ‘out of pocket’ cost, of being denied access to a Caswell clinic prior appointment made by Dr Gaynor Jones and Ruth Bagshaw, was illegal.  He knew no doctor in Wales would support him in that I had ‘significant brain damage’ and should be registered terrorist MAPPA 3/3.
3. Efion Edwards who was a witness to both  Dr Tegwyn Williams’ and the Defendant’s conduct in the matter as to there never having been a restraining order served on me in the first place and why this prosecution is an abuse of process
4. Barbara Wilding the bitch that personally, as defendant in my 33 failed malicious prosecutions 25 year running damages claim, quickly resigned on full Chief Constable pension, when court ordered to give full CPR disclosure of police records but not before ordering for me to be ‘shot’, if possible, during the court ordered ‘exchange of witnesses statements’  by now retired judge HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC despite aware of the likely content.
5. Retired judge, HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC, who can produce the full MAPPA level 3 category 3 investigation documentation to show it was fabricated from the start to have me framed with a machine-gun fit to ‘kill the mayor of Cardiff’ as recorded in both Cardiff crown and magistrates records all need, of course , for an attentive jury, a rare event nowadays.
6. Rtd Judge John Curran, during my 1st restraining order jury trial on 4th May 2012,  past what appeared remarkably like  masonic signals between  one of the jury and CPS prosecutor, David Gareth Edwards causing the latter to be arrested. The judge is required as a witness as he would of made diligent search, after being told original magistrates records were no longer available.
7. Your current CPS prosecutor, M  Smyth did after my 3rd March 2014 3rd restraining order jury trial.  He is therefore required by the defence as he found relevant records within the Cardiff magistrates court previously denied to me me or the first jury (see jury note).
8. HHJ Rowlands, who in turn examined those records in April 2014 then held a clandestine court hearing and quashed the restraining order.

I require the full Crown Court records on my breached restraining order nonsense, since 1st April 2012 Harassment appeal.

Also needed for my proposed 5th jury trial if I continue to be denied court public records and copy of my medical reports that both Dr Tegwyn Williams and prosecutor now a judge, HHJ Richard Thomlow, who both lied through their teeth to Judge Bidder QC in an attempt to have me incarcerated indefinitely in Ashworth.

Also as Leverson LJ and Males J at the Court of Appeal, while both being made ‘unaware of the unlawfully redacted 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown court transcript and very existence of the ‘jury note’ created, still left a remaining audit trail of ‘due diligence’.

This is the preliminary list of defence witnesses required to receive summonses in order, hopefully, the next application is dramatically shortened.

Yours truly.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

FAO

UK’s Ministry of Justice and taxpayers

STOP PRESS

Helicopter sex film officer Adrian Pogmore jailed – BBC News

Almost exactly the same scenario The South Wales did to me and a friend with their dangerous flying but at least I had a T shirt on the court later heard, with written on it, ‘I’d rather be flying G-KIRK’

If my false imprisonment enclosed particulars of claim were the version accepted by the Cardiff court on 31st July then we are all now ‘singing from the same hymn sheet’ for a while until specific disclosure starts to leak out.

Parol Board amendedLeithleyParticularsofClaim

17 08 01 Parole Order

If, on the other hand, the other version of my particulars of claim, of same date, is the only version now before court then that is not correct.

The whole issue surrounding my three years in prison was due to a blackmailed police psychiatrist to falsify my medical records for MAPPA level 3 category 3 registration needed by the 3^rd defendant’s 2^nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court application for my indefinite incarceration in Ashworth high security psychiatric prison.

To achieve the above the 3^rd Defendant, with a little bit of help from their friends in countless Cardiff courts, acted out flagrant breaches of Articles 6,10 and others with number10 omitted, in error or ‘by design’, from my first version of 7th September 2016.

I enclose response to requests for further and better particulars, for all three defendants as for my 1CF03361 machine-gun conspiracy to getting me shot, lawfully.

1686539 Particulars of Claim – 6th action – 1CF03361

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED

I continue my two decades of quest to find a firm of solicitors to deal on my behalf.

In my considered opinion, if only for the tax payer’s sake, this should be adjudicated in a court the further from South Wales the better as local lawyers will milk it, for sure.

It is also my considered opinion and those of my many long suffering Mackenzie Friends, that my unlawful imprisonments in HMP Swansea, HMP Park, HMP Bristol and HMP Cardiff all originates from South Wales Police malfeasance reliant on my deliberately having not been notified of the existence of Cardiff magistrate’s chaotic 1st December 2011 conclusion.

The clandestine creation and botched attempts, ever since, to cover-up the police and Cardiff court conspiracy, over my ‘never served on me’ 1st December 2011 restraining order against Dr Tegwyn Williams, was concocted primarily by the 3rd Defendant in the first place simply to harass my attempts to sue it following their fifty odd failed malicious prosecutions that has destroyed my life, wife, health, wealth and right to commercially fly or practice veterinary surgery anywhere in the world.

I believe, owing to a court mix up as to whether I am or ever was legally represented in this Ministry of Justice case, I am in need of apologising to all three Defendants in not attending on 31st July 2017. I thought on our first meet, in June’s law court, I was legally represented and my attendance was therefore not needed last week.

I enclose my Cardiff’s court blocked machine-gun particulars of claim as an example of the aroma that, sadly, regularly emanates from South Wales law courts whether they be for criminal or civil cases as they are known to have police ‘plants’ in either.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc (Claimant in case number C90CF012)             8th August 2017

(There is an unwritten law within the  UK judiciary that neither lawyers acting in a civil or criminal case, illegally or police when giving evidence are proved liars neither must snitch on the other for fear of derailing their joint ‘gravy train’ funded by the uninformed tax payer).

London Met police officers, to my horror, Furneaux, Nash and Harding were proved liars on oath when stating that the car was being driven on a flat tyre by not telling the driver or owner. The owner, from her arrest and unlawful custody, immediately called in other police to witness her own videoing of a perfectly road worthy tyre driven on by Furneaux, most likely from the road side incident to the police compound without either need of a tyre exchange or a recovery truck!

Both senior police officers and CPS barrister Jones lied to the court by withholding the police car video taken of their victim’s stationary position outside her lawyer’s office to before and after the car was stopped despite countless applications by the aggrieved parties. Part of the journey the police did, in error, release video that showed no deflated tyre up until being unlawfully stopped. So why did the judge do nothing about their deceit?

The answer is within the small print of this article

file:///C:/Users/Maurice/Downloads/bentlawyersandcops.com-FEATURED%20COPS%20(1).pdf

Now, can I appeal the Recorder of Cardiff’s latest ruling before 4th trial as an abuse of process and will I finally be allowed to put in a defence, to a jury, refused so far as an embarrassment, that you cannot be convicted of harassment, under the badly written 1997 law, now that I have, not just detected the doctor’s crimes with Professor Rodger Wood who with Barbara Wilding, put him up to it, I have also prevented further crime being committed by him in the UK for the moment.

09 02 25 Barbara Wilding Affidavit Lies (2)

Retired Chief Constable

Meanwhile, who is doing the predicted ‘world tour’, at the moment, if not to avoid witness summonses instructed to be served on them both for my 4th farcical jury trial, on 12th September 2017 in Cardiff Crown Court?

A police blackmailed doctor who knowingly falsified their victim’s medical records neither examined his so called ‘patient’ nor qualified to interpret his Dr Gaynor Jones authorised brain scans, contrary to three experts in the field, to go on, would you believe, to recommend not just I be registered MAPPA level 3 category 3, in the top 5% most dangerous but stood in a clandestine court, I was later unofficially told, to recommend I be jailed for life in Ashworth without need of a risky jury trial.

The 4th jury may see paragraphs 35/36 of one of Dr Tegwyn Williams’ reports stating I was not actually a risk to society but was if I managed to instil the required level of paranoia from within his current medium security prison, Caswell Clinic Bridgend. Paranoia, he wrote for Judge Neil Bidder QC, in my aging three helpers, now deceased Patrick Cullinane Esq, 94 year old Norman Scarth Esq and another of similar age, I have met only once!  Real Enid Blyton stuff that ought to be put to music

Norman Scarth Esq was 70 years old before he discovered the widespread corruption in our UK law courts.

I learnt it in Taunton at an age before 30 when police repeatedly lied with prosecution when failing to convict me for ‘low flying’, speeding on my motor bike, ‘pushing in a police car roof with an aircraft’ ‘whilst in flight’, having an old VW being ‘over loaded’ due to an aircraft strapped to the roof, fabricated ‘assaulting police’ with an antique flint lock and stealing  Chief Superintendent curly Hawkins’ personal note book from third draw down on the left of his desk deep in the heart of Taunton police station.

The lying came more from the lawyers than the police, in those days but now the habit is rife especially in Cardiff’s civil and criminal law courts

Recently in Isleworth Crown Court I watched the corruption, day by day, unfold shaking me up, at last, to the fact that England cannot be that much less good at it, after all, than South Wales where deceit by officialdom is accepted as the norm.

The police told the Isleworth Crown Court the car was stopped but had not shown or told the driver or owner why.

The police told the court it was due to a ‘flat rear tyre’ but neither two barristers, defending each in the car nor the prosecution, asked,,,”why didn’t you tell the owner of the car, as passenger or the driver why they were stopped ?”

Both defence barristers nobbled which is why neither sought the police video before the car was stopped, from solicitor’s office nor the video, after stop, catching of Furneaux allegedly examining the ‘flat tyre’ which of course, never happened.

Evidence not disputed by prosecution, must be said, of owner’s own video of car tyre in police compound, filmed with police present , displayed a legal and inflated tyre especially as it was driven there the night before by Furneaux or another!

The lying little bastards

But what were the two magistrates and judge doing about it?  ‘Sweat Fanny Adams’, just as in my my welsh cases, the verdicts were all predetermined because Sheda had also ‘kicked against the pricks’ and drawn blood on the chins of HM Partnership

Clearly due to the fact Sheda had just come from her lawyers and in court next day fighting over corrupt law firm, defunct Dean and Dean, for stealing her money when impersonating a lawyer. The police had their orders.

Not only were they caught colluding on evidence, part heard at Magistrates,PCs Furneaux , Nash and another were caught doing it in the Crown Court police witness room ,again, while Judge Hill-Smith did nothing and refused to do anything about it

Nash and Furneaux caught red handed coming and leaving court together.

The ‘bench’ give away was no questions to clarify the legality of ‘stop’ clearly pre -arranged.

‘Case Stated’ they hate as was shown in so many of my South Wales court ‘stitch ups’ by so many bent judges and bent CPS barristers all protected in amongst the HM pleats of Her Majesty’s ‘partnership’ deal and so outdated for decades, now, to come if an ‘informed’ brexit vote not allowed.

Germany and France both laughing over the 3rd World War with out a shot needing to be fired.

7th August 2017

Court Delivery Manager

Isleworth Crown Court

36 Ridgway Road

London

TW7 5LP

Dear Sir/Madam

DPP v. DR. SHEIDA ORAKI – APPEAL CASE NO. A2060176 – APPLICATIONS

UNDER RULE 5(2)(A) AND 3(B) OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES 2015

I write to request to be supplied with a copy of the court’s Record Sheet in the above appeal,

in respect of which Recorder Hill-Smith sitting with two lay justices, gave judgment on 2nd

August 2017 relating to my appeal and that of Ramtin Oraki.

I would also seek to be supplied with copies of all of the documentary exhibits submitted by

both parties in the case, including any Statements of Witnesses tendered under section 9 of

the Criminal Justice Act 1967.

I also request to be supplied with DVD copies of all of the recordings made of the hearings

that took place in court 10 on 27th, 28 July 2017, 31st July 2017 and 2nd August 2017.

The reasons why this information is required is to assist with an application to state a case

and if refused, possible Judicial Review proceedings.

I make this application under rule 5(2)(a), and 3(b) of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2015.

Yours faithfully

Dr Sheida Oraki

My email circulated world-wide stating current ‘state of play’ in Cardiff’s courts

Unlawful delay in machine-gun/parole/4th action/appeal at RCJ civil cases re 12th Sept’s 4th jury trial denied disclosure

 

It is clear following Recorder of Cardiff’s refusal, re 4th jury trial is an Abuse of Process and accepting I was ‘served’ a restraining order on 1st Dec 2011 and Lord Justice Leverson and Mr Justice Males saying, on appeal from my 1st jury trial, ‘there was nothing in the transcript’ re 1st jury asking for written records of its  ‘service’ on me when clearly there was and still is, still leaves the CCRC , Geoamey, police and Cardiff courts all still refusing disclosure of relevant records for the 1st , 2nd, 3rd and now 4th jury as far too many Cardiff judges, lawyers and HMC&TS staff have deliberately lied through their back teeth in an attempt to cover up their disgusting conspiracy to pervert the course of justice purely to affect my police one million pound damages claim concerning fifty odd failed malicious prosecutions

The very same spineless individuals in Cardiff’s administration are at it again simply to defend their police in my damages claims from their 25 years of blatant harassment while my trying to practice veterinary surgery in the Vale of Glamorgan.

They therefore doubled my prison term, in 2014, simply for my purported publication of a photograph of passers by in Swansea, WITH THEIR PERMISSION!

Now His Honour Judge Keyser QC is minded, it would appear by the latest court document below, to have blocked my Article 10 infringement addition omitted in error in my September 2016 one million pound ‘particulars of claim’ against my own Ministry of Justice.

My own administration in London, to my incensed  embarrassment, is once again at the English and Welsh tax payers’ expense left, yet again, with the cleaning up to do for the evil short arsed shits in Cardiff who seem to be allowed to do what they want , when they want and  answerable neither to the laws of our land nor our UK Government.

My July 2016 ‘particulars of claim’, altered to my September 2016 claim was,, in  itself, amended by my simple re insertion of the Article 10, the heart of the matter.

Now this is blocked by a Cardiff judge because, may be, it is the very same legal argument (common sense argument) now before my 4th jury, on the subject of abuse of process, on 12th September 2017 Cardiff Crown Court re police/prison failed disclosure of evidence contrary to Article 6.

All because of Cardiff Cabal’s continuing conspiracy to either alter or destroy incriminating public records, while preventing my attending no less than seven court cases, so far, as I will not be blackmailed in using a court controlled lawyer, the bastards.

Nine of my machine-gun MAPPA jury told us, after the acquittal, that there was obviously a police informant amongst them as he refused either to discuss the merits of the case, each day over two weeks or enter a ‘not guilty’ plea.

There will be a minimum of two informants to report back to the prosecution on my next jury for the Dr Tegwyn Williams ‘stitch up’ 4th jury trial.

ECHR Article 10 – Freedom of expression

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.

2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.

parole-board-particulars-of-claim

16 09 07 Parole amended ParticularsofClaim

Parol Board amendedLeithleyParticularsofClaim

2nd July 2017                                                                                         C90CF012

FAO Cardiff County Court                                                                   BS614159 +2

Wales

Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police, HM Justice Ministry & HM Parole Board

Dear Sir,

1. At the last hearing, I asked for judgements/orders etc to be sent by email address.
2. At my April/May 2016 default judgement application (first form error for correct case number, corrected by 2nd hand written). Neither Parole Board nor Justice Ministry filed defences unless you now say otherwise? What was the result, please?
3. I enclose my first 2016 claim enclosing article 10 inadvertently left out of my 7th Sept amended particulars and ask for proof it was filed with the court last year?
4. 4. At the last hearing, by sheer chance that I even attended believing I was legally represented, I left more confused over a purported judgement of last summer, by a judge North? Please send me copy confirming it had been originally sent by email?
5. 5. At the last hearing, if my poor memory is correct, defendant or defendants denied knowledge of my 7th September 2016 amended claim being received when it was served on the court and I was told any fee paid.
6. 6, Now I have sent again to your court another copy, as per court direction, of my 7th September 2016 particulars and request proof of service as I have asked for proof of service, in the past, for my original application for full default judgment in 2016.
7. I remember last time I was so stupid to sue HM Partnership, the reason for remaining in the EU for protection of HM widespread abuse by underlings, Cardiff County Court apologised to itself saying, “perhaps, the service of particulars of claim had not been served on the HM Governor of Cardiff Prison’. By mistake?
8. ‘A likely story’ when the co-defendant, the police, acknowledged receipt of service!
9. You still refuse disclosure of records amassed in my first HM Partnership skirmish (5^th Action) and since then closed ranks with your police to prevent my expediting my cases to avoid this confusion when simply not letting me stand at the public counter, contrary to law.
10. Your court refuses to let me have sight of the BS614159 +2 Maurice Kirk v police claim court records now filed in the RCJ for appeal requiring copy of the court log, exhibits, evidence and all court refusals, especially re witness subpoenas, for RCJ.
11. Is it any wonder the RCJ appear to continue to ignore my requests to process my appeal, as a ‘can of judicial welshing worms’ while your court has confiscated my police interview tape, ‘indictable and not under caution’ from one of my 33 successful defences for 33 malicious prosecutions from 100 yet to come before your so called ‘system’.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

www.kirkflyingvet.com

mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Deliberate MAPPA/Ministry of Justice leaked lies to cover up 20 years plus multi Cardiff judges/lawyers/HMC&TS bloody disgraceful dishonest conduct.

‘The Buck’ stopped in Cardiff Crown Court last month before The Recorder of Cardiff who handed down a Min of Justice ordered judgment that those HMC&TS staff and Geoamey Custodial Services who lied that there was ‘service’ on me of a Dr Tegwyn Williams restraining order in the cells, in 2011 Cardiff magistrates, have won and saved their pensions.

Despite written records of such an event in the possession of CCRC, as well, to confirm my ignorance of there even being a R/O in existence, the 1st jury asked were refused them, of course, by bent bastard, Judge John Curran and a similar spineless CPS barrister David Gareth Evans. He also knew the truth but preferred their ‘alternative’ facts, a habit in the welsh courts it appears.

Frantically altered by clerk of court , Michael Williams, when records were asked for Lord Justice Levderson and Mr Justice Smales

but the court record of my appeal records the lordships asked for no such record and emphasised it by sayin g the transcript appeared to have no record of the jury aking either!

Does it stink or does it really stink?

Slipped copy of hurriedly rewritten page of Cardiff court log

It is now eight years since in 2009 Dr Tegwyn Williams said there was significant irreversible brain damage where Dr Williams said he could not predict how that condition would progress. Does it therefore follow for the Court to reassess Mr Kirk’s health to see how Mr Kirk’s significant irreversible brain damage has progressed.

Or do we follow up and find the result of the radiological investigations of 2009 where there are Judge Cooke’s comments of the 24 June 2010 saying:-

“..there were clearly radiological investigations undertaken…”

What is certain is Dr Williams is only a psychiatrist and he also knows that Professor Wood is only a psychologist and that neither Psychiatrist Dr Williams or Psychology Professor Wood are medically qualified to determine the presence or absence of brain damage from brain scans to report their own findings to a Crown Court.

Would it save the time of the Court to face the truth that Dr Williams has entirely made things up, and does so in other cases. Please would the Court read Chapter 10 of “Justice for William” by Helen P Simpson to see a trend regards Dr Williams.

Reasonable excuse – dissemination of truth to implement various Mental Health Acts.

Dr Williams is a Psychiatrist who can take away a person liberty. To keep those powers he must get the support of his colleagues, such as two other psychiatrists with such powers to sign his renewal or else he cannot continue.

Therefore it is a part the implementation of the Mental Health Act 1983, 2007 and all the various updating measures to disseminate information to prevent psychiatrists who do wrong and so who are unsuitable from continuing.

Entirely making up significant irreversible damage is obviously a material issue to being considered unsuitable to continue as a Psychiatrist.

All psychiatrists, employers, regulators and insurers who may be asked to counter sign or support that Dr Williams remain a psychiatrist need to know the truth, as a part of the implementation of the law (as in the various Mental Health Acts).

Reasonable excuse – Are Judges allowed to impose Restraining Orders that would collude in a potentially substantial insurance fraud?

A condition of being a UK Section 12 doctor is that they prove they have insurance to cover those duties. The insurers need to know if there is a history of making things up so that the doctor is obviously unsuitable as being too much of an insurance risk.

Preventing the dissemination of material information about Dr Williams trend of dishonesty to potential insurers is highly improper if not potentially fraud. A Restraining Order made by a Court that has obviously ignored the facts and seemingly colludes in fraud can be at least morally wrong if not an illegality, to give reasonable excuse to ignore aspects of it’s conditions.

GMC use the “local” Responsible Officer system and so could not previously investigate.

By the Medical Act 1983 the GMC “local” Responsible Officer who recommended to the GMC whether a case against Dr Williams should proceed was Dr Bruce Ferguson. But Dr Ferguson is his friend and is accused of collusion with Dr Williams.

But Dr Ferguson has now retired. The GMC use a five year time limit rule Therefore by Dr Williams still abusing his position as a doctor who works with police, to continue his vendetta by using obviously false reports and false comments, the GMC can start afresh and now seek to investigate.