I have been very reluctant, obviously, to further involve my Vale of Glamorgan elected member to the House for nearly a decade but it can no longer be avoided.
Some of the withheld letters from my sister and John Graham by G4S/police until my day of violent eviction on1st November 2019 from HMP Parc. The letters related to the legal action against G4S and South Wales Police, year in year out, blocking my essential daily medications for my carcinogenic advanced Barrett’s syndrome in my gullet.
This week, after the 4th insulting demand, I attended HM Crown Court where, despite CPS barrister promises each time to disclose, your South Wales Police continue to pervert the course of justice by denying me a copy of those letters I sent to you but were stopped without my knowledge at the time in both Cardiff and Parc prisons.
This G4S letter was only written after I had published world-wide my damages claim.
This was while I was in Cardiff prison in 2019 for a ‘breach of a restraining order’ never served on me in the first place, as with the previous 2011 nonsense, in order to avoid the embarrassment of an appeal or ‘variation’ that would disclose the truth about my Caswell Clinic falsified medical records that has done so much harm to my family.
On 1st November 2019 eight G4S prison officers seriously assaulted me on ejecting me from my prison cell with handcuffs behind my back. This was purely to seize my 1CF03361 ‘trading in machine-gun’ civil claim papers with an imminent jury trial, incidentally, against the South Wales Police, the defendant in yet another concocted 40odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. This leaves my stolen property still under welsh authority ‘control’ that successive organisations, I have contacted, have failed to recover on my behalf.
Why, because, apart from the one million pound plus damages claim against the South Wales Police there is my £5000,000 claim against G4S for being a party to serious perversion of justice and bullying, within the prison walls, due to fabricated convictions now dreamed up including, ‘firearms, narcotics, ABH, FTA and ‘child abuse’!
John Graham Esq, who has often complained to my then MP, was another injured party in whose letters, both in and out of the two prisons, were purloined, delayed or destroyed by an array of welsh authorities, with the Chief Constable being the ‘nigger in the wood-pile’ each time. Mr Graham even attended Exeter Crown court, this week, to address the presiding judge, HHJ Rose, for not having his letters either returned or offered any explanation at all!
The way forward to simplify the future, I suggest, is for your office to supply me with copies of any of my letters that managed to filter through my MAPPA 3/3 censored prison communications in the past 10 years.
Any expense or Conservative Party donation suggested, for the work needed, then I am only too willing to oblige.
Adrian Oliver, senior partner, continues to enjoy immunity to criminal prosecution, only because he is in Cardiff and because he is defending the South Wales Chief Constable in Barbara Wilding’s 2009 ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy when attempting to having me shot.
To have me shot for welsh police losing over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions.
Now, the machine -gun civil claim enters its 11th year not a patch on my civil claim BS614159 etc (40failed prosecutions) as that goes on now into its 3rd decade, not unlikeJarndyce and Jarndycein dickens’ Bleak House.
Why? well the corrupt welsh first stopped my entering the court building for nearly 10 years, to slow me down and because the HM Royal Courts of Justice are refusing, due the stench of it, to allow to hear my appeal with its transcripts and court log records confiscated — what really goes on in our welsh law courts.
The police bullying continues…….
CASE NO:1CF03361
& D00CF279
IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT
MAURICE JOHN KIRK
Claimant
and
CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY
Defendant
This is an N244 Application (Cases 1CF03361 and D00CF279) to vary and remove all sanctions in the Order 31 May 2019 and for Directions as to how to proceed when not understanding past Court Directions and Orders. And is made in response to a Cardiff County Court email message 14 January 2019 to the unrepresented Claimant from HHJ Keyser QC, kindly explaining the meaning of the Order 31 May 2019 that the stay is lifted as from 9 January 2020 and the Claimant should now make this application promptly.
Introduction
.
The Defendant have for ten years stood by what Dr XX says in his reports as a part of the Lewis Gun prosecution 2009 as true reliable fair and accurate. Yet as a part of this Lewis Gun case Dr XX in his report to the Cardiff Crown Court 30 September 2009 point 11 says:-
“…My current preliminary position is that whilst Maurice Kirk is fit to plead, his difficulty in organising ……as a result of brain injury……..he would be unable to conduct his own defence”
As Dr XX says the Claimant has significant “irreversible” brain damage it follows that by what Dr XX says in 2009 may apply in 2019 so that the Claimant would be unable to organise a complex case at a Court.
If the Defendant does not stand by Dr XX as being true reliable fair and accurate then that opens up how the Defendant has maliciously and dishonestly imprisoned the Claimant from 2011 to 2019 based on prosecution papers that the Defendant knew was untrue and as a way to obstruct the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil proceedings. Which the Claimant believes is what has happened.
Importantly to understand the deceit by the Defendant and prove they have done wrong by dishonesty at the Courts and to have interfered with the Claimant’s ability to progress civil proceedings, we do not need to go into whether the Claimant was guilty of harassment of the doctor who wrote false and malicious reports.
We only need to look at how the Defendant when bring prosecution deceitfully portraying the doctor as all good having done no wrong and the Claimant as all bad. So that the sentencing and subsequent harsh treatment was grossly disproportionate for the Claimant ‘rationally’ saying the truth that under the Section 12 annual and periodic renewal process of Mental Health Act 1983, the public and UK wide profession needs to know.
It is the proportionality of the sentence and harshness of the treatment there after, as a result of deceit, malice and dishonesty (by not admitting the serious, if not criminal wrong Dr XX does) is actually how the Defendant has interfered in the Claimant’s ability to progress his civil cases and the Lewis Gun case civil claim.
In short the Defendant has directly and indirectly deliberately triggered so many problems for the Claimant that a normal person could not manage Court procedure and deadlines with the Defendant causing so many civil and criminal proceedings and disputes, all with intense detail and while the Claimant has a loss of liberty with legal papers confiscated and formal post to and from Courts and relevant parties blocked or withheld.
While experiencing loss of liberty the Claimant had a number of potentially serious health issues where because the Defendant triggers the Claimant be dealt with harshly so that access to care became an embroiled dispute. And physical assaults occurred on top of potentially serious physical medical problems. Yet while all this occurred the Claimant was left without adequate medical care.
Also from what the Defendant caused while at the Bail Hostel for a short period, the Claimant was singled out for a different set of conditions which were far stricter and harsher regime to his peers. Again this led to more dispute casework.
The problems and number of disputes and issues are by far too many, too detailed and too hard going for the Client/lawyer relationship to cope. And the cost of trying to fight back in defence using lawyers is far too expense for any lay person.
The Defendant Interfered and obstructed the main substantive civil case hearing in Cardiff in 2013
The Claimant takes this opportunity to point out that the Defendant improperly used one of the four criminal prosecutions over Dr XX (based on evidence they knew was untrue) to prevent the Claimant being able to organise and have essential police evidence and witnesses in the 2013 main BS614159 substantive hearing into the wrongdoing by South Wales Police.
The Claimant is not understanding what to do.
The unrepresented lay Claimant genuinely cannot understand Court Orders and what is required of him and that includes how he was supposed to respond in case D00CF279. The Claimant does not understand how to go about listing his Document when the Defendant’s lawyers block the Claimant reading their Documents. And other example is, do Documents listed in the Further Particulars need to be again listed in a list of Documents?
The Defendant provoke problems from Multi Agencies as a way to obstruct the Claimant from taking part in civil proceedings
Regards the material time to comply with Court Orders. It took all manner of failed attempt by lawyers to try to urgently protect the Claimant by addressing huge problems, to only then realise that the Claimant and Claimant’s lawyer’s time is wasted trying to get an organisation to treat the Claimant fairly if the Defendant as police (and senior police) use their authority to tell the organisation to do different and the Defendant as police impose organisations use false information and cause organisations to treat the Claimant harshly and unfairly .
When the Lewis Gun case prosecution failed and the Defendant has use and continue obvious events within the Lewis Gun case to imprison the Claimant each year since the Lewis Gun case ended in 2010.
A simple way to get through a decade of detail is to compare the 2008/9 Lewis Gun case with the last prosecution by the Defendants knew what they saying was not true fair reasonable or proportionate.
The Defendant as senior police control Multi Agency working and the information on which multi agencies make decisions regards the Claimant.
Intensely false criminal records – including child abuse and fire arms Narcotics, ABH and FTA false convictions. So many false entries the problem is hard to deal with.
False and wildly exaggerated risk assessments are caused by endless untrue comments on top of a false criminal history. So many false comments they are hard to deal with.
Being wrongly regarded as very high risk causes loss of liberty and rights to further obstruct the Claimant and triggers he be treated harshly and unfairly. Which again leads to so very many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
The Defendant triggered obstructing if not blocking access to health care leading to considerable hardship and more disputes that arise where they resist the Claimant be allowed his basic rights. Which over the last two-year sentence led to so many problems and disputes they are hard to deal with.
Parole decisions were based on false data maliciously supplied by police to cause extra prison terms in all convictions and in both prison recalls
The G4S subculture take it upon themselves that given the Defendant senior police say such of the Claimant that G4S not only can obstruct the Claimant’s legal papers and proceedings but are free to subject the Claimant to beatings and bullying and also to get the fellow violent prisoners to do same to the Claimant. Again, there were so many incidents which are also part of a prison dispute system it is all too much and too difficult to cope with.
Things became so wild that when the Claimant sent the usual harmless letters to his English and Welsh MPs streets were sealed off and the Claimant interviewed under caution in case the very small residue of the Claimant’s toothpaste on the back of his letters posed a most serious risk to the public and Members of Parliament. Again, the Defendant saw to it that this ongoing episode was not a small matter so that again made it hard for the Claimant to manage all of the above and the civil proceedings.
The Claimant personal life has turmoil from similar outside of prison and his lawyer along with family has to try to address matters there.
So many intense problems were occurring that the volume of quite unnecessary work caused by the Defendant becomes unmanageable for the Claimant and the huge volume and intensity would undermine any lawyer client relationship and be far too expensive for a normal lay Claimant.
Claimant needs the Court to explain what is expected of him.
The Claimant needed and still needs the Court to explain to him what was and what now is required of him given the increased complexity.
Normally where a lay Claimant is unable to get legal advice, then the lawyers representing the public sector Defendant would act as Officers of the Court and explain the procedure and what to do next to the lay unrepresented Claimant. But in this case the Defendant’s lawyers act in bad faith.
The Claimant received an email from Cardiff County Court 14 January 2020 at 15.08pm, saying the Claimant’s email regards not being able to understand the Order 31 May 2019, was put before HHJ Keyser QC who comments:-
”……the case was stayed until 9 January 2020. The stay
is now ended. Any application for relief from sanction
must be made promptly”
The lay Claimant promptly makes this N244 application because the ex-parte hearing and Order of 31 May 2019 being controlled by the Defendant in the absence of the Claimant, is too far removed from the very obvious truth and facts of the Defendant’s agenda and actions in the 2009 Lewis Gun case at the Crown Court.
One main reason to bring an action that is a good use of Court time, is to stop problems continuing.
One problem is the aim of the Defendant in bringing the failed Lewis Gun prosecution of 2009 and the subsequent directly four prosecutions, was to prevent the Claimant address his Judicial Review and civil case where both were looming.
And that the Defendant continually prosecutes and imprisons the Claimant to obstruct and prevent the Claimant addressing his civil proceedings where the Defendant knows the prosecution papers and police information systems are not true.
The Order 31 May 2019 is too far removed from very obvious truth and facts of what the Defendant does to continue their 2008/9 agenda to obstruct the Claimants from taking and addressing civil proceedings by harming the Claimant each year since 2009.
So that the Claimant was imprisoned for five years due to blatant deceit by the Defendant, and particularly between 2016/17 to late 2019. – based on papers and police information systems where it is obvious the Defendant did not and cannot possibly believe are true or fair.
New evidence
But there is (and will be) much new evidence as to the extent that the Defendant works to harm the Claimant is actually via multi agency collusion and as explained below the deceit and malice by the Defendant and how they aim to obstruct the lay Claimant, – is getting even worse. And without the intervention of the Courts will be indefinite.
The Claimant lives in England and is not safe entering South Wales.
An obvious need is for the case to be transferred to England so that the Claimant can avoid entering South Wales. As the Claimant lives in England not transferring the case would put the Claimant at risk of serious harm.
Should the Claimant start a new civil action in England regards the Defendant prosecuting using information they know is not true and ask English Court for the Lewis Gun case be drawn into that new civil action?
From yet again being recently put in prison it has become obvious to the Claimant that he needs to bring a civil action to stop the Defendant bringing or provoking prosecutions based on details that they know is not proportionate, and so far from what is proportionate, is therefore not true.
The information the Defendant knows to be untrue but still continually uses that information to prosecute the Claimant, has arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case. A new civil action would rely on the same papers plus more. The extra would be related the prosecution cases brought by the Defendant since 2009 to 2019 and ongoing.
The Claimant needs to seek legal advice as to whether to state the new claim to include Maladministration, Malfeasance, Misfeasance and Malicious Prosecution (and even nonfeasance for colluding with a medical writer who acted seemingly criminally) as even if convicted a civil action can still be bought in rare situations, such as here where the Defendant cannot possibly believe their own prosecution papers as proportionate and therefore the Defendant knew the prosecution papers were not true.
Malfeasance – Request to assist, include and monitor the Claimant’s pre action request of the Chief Constable regards 2020. Or should this be a pre action protocol that is integrated into the Lewis Gun Case?
The Claimant seeks time and opportunity to take legal advice on the technicalities of these issues.
Possibly Malfeasance can occur if the Chief Constable does not in 2020 personally impose into police systems and procedures, new Decisions and measures by the Chief Constable that ensure the Defendant end their deceit in police information systems and particularly any response by the Defendants lawyers.
It can be said these 2020 issues have arisen out of the 2009 Lewis Gun case.
The outcome of a new claim around malfeasance could be a way to address the deceitful and dishonest conduct of the Defendant’s internal and external lawyers.
Directions of the Court on potential applications by the Claimant regards solicitors Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s conduct during proceedings before the Courts and Warning to Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill regards perverting the Course of Justice
We are all aware responsibility comes with control and that Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill have high level of control over the Defendant, because any Police Officer no matter how senior cannot go against what the Police ‘senior’ lawyers says.
If Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill adequately communicate to the Defendant the truth of the horrific wrong that Dr XX has done and also communicate to the Defendant that the false information (see letter form Belinda Kirk 25 July 2019 regards the Defendant totally falsified that the Claimant is a risk to his family)
It follows that the wrongdoing and potentially criminal acts of bring prosecutions based on what they know is not true has occurred quite directly as a result of Adrian Oliver’s and Richard Leighton Hill’s actions and inactions for which they can be personally liable before the criminal and civil courts.
The Claimant request Directions form the Court for a date when Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill update on and if that response regards correcting false information (See attached letter 17 July 2019 from Belinda Kirk) and admitting the wrong Dr XX does, is not satisfactory to give directions such as:-.
As to how the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be a part of civil proceedings
And/or the false information and highly improper and potentially criminal actions and inactions of Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill be part of a new claim in England
And/or that to maintain confidence in the profession and the Courts that the Court give Directions for a hearing to sanction and potentially strike off the roll Adrian Oliver and Richard Leighton Hill and they can apply to the SRA if the wish to be reinstated.
Why the Defendant brought a malicious prosecution of the Lewis Gun case when they knew what they were saying was not true was to obstruct and prevent the Claimant in bring civil proceedings.
The context of the Lewis Gun case was according to the MAPPA minutes to prevent the publicity that may occur with the Claimant taking civil proceedings where any normal person can be expected to veer towards thinking that so very many prosecutions there must be wrongdoing by police and those in authority who collude with those police. Please documents see as attached.
Request Order for Disclosure and an Order to read the Defendant’s lawyers documents.
Please would the Court Order a date, time and duration and a neutral location such as a conference room in Bristol or Taunton (at a Court or a business room such as a hotel conference room or lawyers firm) where the Defendant’s lawyers must allow the Claimant to read documents.
The Defendants lawyers are asked to be able to tell the Court how they will arrange the Document being made available at a neutral venue within easy travelling distance to the Claimant’s home in Taunton.
Please could the Court Order disclosure for the Claimant for the Lewis Gun case and also request the Chief Constable to decide the Defendant to stop their deceit
As we are all aware In the UK there has been a major scandal at how police have improperly withheld disclosure at Criminal trials and this scandal is wider spread in the national media and is clearly acknowledged by the Police College who have new procedures to try to ensure police start to disclose adequately.
Please can the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the 2009/2010 Lewis Gun case.
Please could the Court Order the Disclosure that the Claimant should have had in the four criminal trials from 2011 to present that have arisen out the dispute of a collusion regards false police MAPPA NHS medical report(s). Where the medical writer colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA in the Lewis gun case and when the Claimant makes protests at their deceit they both (Defendant and medical writer) prosecute the Claimant using information they know is not true. And they also do this to obstruct the Claimant taking civil proceedings regards their deceit and malice in the Lewis Gun case.
The Claimant’s 2019 lay version of Further Particulars that worries the Defendants as too close to the truth. But did the Defendant obstruct the Claimant complying with civil proceedings by imprisoning the Claimant by a prosecution using information the Defendant knew was untrue?
The Claimant complied with the Court Order to supply Further Particulars by a stipulated date and did so using a lawyer.
However, in February 2019 the Claimant could not approve what the lawyer sent to the Court as the Defendant’s arrested the Claimant that weekend in the middle of the period of Claimant meeting with his lawyer. The lawyer could not meet the claimant in custody during an arrest period and did not know where the Claimant was but rather did a best effort at what the Claimant wished so as not to miss the deadline.
Furthermore, it is very obvious that regards at least proportionality or the excessive length of the prison sentence (that meant the Claimant could not meet with his lawyer) is due to the Defendant lawyers and the Defendant being deceitful before the Courts, as to the medical report being blatantly untrue. Or if the medical reports are true to first examine that a prosecution would not be appropriate but rather NHS assessment and care would be appropriate.
The fact the Defendant did not start with a reassessment of the medical states of the Claimant shows they brought a prosecution not believing the medical reports that the Claimant protests (or allegedly harasses) about, were true.
Possibly the Court may wish to ignore and put to one side the Defendant’s lawyers panic at a lay version of the truth, until the Chief Constable responds to potential pre action communications regards “a management Decision” of the Chief Constable that there will be no further deceit by the Defendants on specific issues that will be raised?
However especially as the lay Claimant has not failed to comply with an Order to submit Further Particulars, as he did submit a lawyers document on time, but it can appear fair, reasonable and common sense that a lay Claimant if doing a complex case himself for the Claimant to be allowed use his way of explaining the case by his “additional” lay document.
An example where the Order 31 May 2019 is not acknowledging obvious material issues – Please compare the Doctor’s writing with the Caswell Team’s medical evidence quoted below from 2009.
For example we also have to consider that either the Defendant’s August to October 2009 medical report(s) of the Lewis Gun case mean that the Claimant has significant irreversible brain damage (where the rate of deterioration was said to be not known and needs to be monitored/reassessment). And is also delusional in a number of ways. And so should not be expect to cope with complying with Court Directions and Orders. Or if not given the unusual facts (for example that two Radiologists give a normal all clear result 28 August 2009) it follows for all parties should admit the Defendant’s medical report(s) as intentionally false, biased and malicious and so leading to how the Defendant has unlawfully imprisoned the lay Claimant for five years from 2011 to 2019 by the Defendant and their lawyers being deceitful at Courts and it has been the Defendant who has prevented the Claimant from addressing civil proceedings.
Please note some detail on the prosecution of cases since 2009 where the Claimant is accused of harassing the writer of the medical reports. If to keep things simple we imagine hypothetically that responses of the Claimant were excessive and so the conviction is not in doubt, we are then left with the prosecution papers are deceitful and dishonest because of if the writer of the medical reports was accurate and the prosecution was honest, then a man with significant irreversible brain damage and with PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder) would not have served 5 years in prison. In the well-known farmer Tony Martin who had PDD, when he was convicted of murder (shot at two youths escaping his property) he had a sentence of only 3 years due to PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder).
If on the other hand, if the Defendants prosecution cases were to be honest and admitted the bias, deceit, malice and dishonesty of the writer of the medical reports, then either a prosecution would not have proceeded. Or the Claimant would not have served five years in prison because the Claimant would have been recognised as saying the truth that the public and profession need to know. Or the writer of the medical reports could be prosecuted for his exceptional dishonesty before the Courts and to police – on five occasions in five criminal cases between 2009 and 2019.
It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.
The Lewis Gun case 2009 Caswell Clinic Team assessment of the Claimant
An additional dimension is that as part of the Lewis Gun case there was a team assessment by Caswell Clinic the result of which differed to what the doctor who colluded with the Defendant and the 2009 team report page 42 says that the Claimant is not delusion but
“…suffering from a significant degree of anxiety..”
and that
“…continued physical and psychological stress could
have an adverse effect on him in the future…”
Suffering from high levels of anxiety often means a person is not normally well enough to conduct complex legal proceedings at the usual pace and speed and would need to be given extra time and leniency.
We need to add the extra dimension and extra level of harm was caused by the Defendant’s quite sinister use of a collusion with multi agencies that the Defendant organised from 2009 to the present ‘and indefinitely’, is causing the obstruction that has prevented the Claimant from dealing with all of his civil claims.
As explained below the Defendant has been extending their bullying of the Claimant by a deceitful use of multi agency working that would damage anyone’s mental state, so that the Claimant cannot participate in his civil legal proceedings against the Defendant.
But then when the Claimant mental state is not the best, to exaggerate that as if the Claimant is a high or highest risk to the community.
The Claimant seeks new Directions that recognise how the Defendant’s trend of deceit and malice within the Lewis Gun case has been continued each year. And the Claimant asks the Court that the truth and facts in the trend of what the Defendant actually does is allowed to become evidence before the Court.
Request Chief Constable personally confirm that specific deceit and dishonesty regards the writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports will not reoccur in prosecutions, any Court papers or in police information systems.
It is therefore becoming obvious that the direction of the claims against the Defendant needs to be varied to address the main problem. Whether by changes to the present claim or by a new claim which can potentially be added to the present claim. With an emphasis on identifying the deceit and dishonesty and to prevent similar deceit in prosecutions and police information systems in future.
As we are aware the Chief Constable as the Chief of all police officers staff and lawyers and is liable for what they do. The writer of the Lewis Gun medical reports requested the loss of liberty of the Claimant and the Defendant has continued to use these obviously false reports as if true and accurate. To know how to make requests of the Court or to particularise papers the Claimant requests the Chief Constable personally makes the decision that South Wales Police and it’s information systems, multi-agency communications and it’s lawyers will permanently acknowledge that the writer of the medical reports of 2009 “did some wrong” so contrary to what arrests and prosecutions since 2010 to present, that the Claimant acts with genuine grievance and to specify as explained below
Example of a just some of the criminal case against Dr TW and police who colluded with him that the Chief Constable and Defendant need to act on.
The Claimant was Sectioned in August 2009 by the NHS doctor who colluded with the Defendant via MAPPA and potential could be true that the Lewis Gun case would have lost momentum if it were not for this NHS doctor
Does the Claimant have Significant Irreversible Brain Damage? Or is the Defendant dishonest to even a criminal level of deceit?
Please see as attached that by 28 August 2009 two Radiologist Dr Aisling Butler and then a second opinion check by Dr Gareth Tudor who are the experts employed by Dr TW’s NHS for being qualified and experienced to interpret Brain Scans said that the result was normal, which the Claimant understands as a message to all other doctors of an all clear.
Please see an update 30 September 2009 that Dr XX writes for the Crown Court to request loss of liberty by Section for another month where Dr XX says to apply for a Mental Health Act Section that
“Assessment
The Assessment of Maurice Kirk has concentrated on several areas, mainly the presence or absence of any mental illness and the presence or absence of any traumatic brain injury”
But if we examine Dr XX report of 29 September 2009 which is used as evidence at the Crown Court, Dr XX has totally left out and hidden from the Crown Court that the two Radiologist 28 August 2009 have given a normal all clear result and Dr XX deceitfully states:-
“Maurice Kirk has been referred for detailed brain scans”.
29 September 2009 in point 7
“….suffers with dysfunction of the ventral prefrontal cortex
of the brain….further neuropsychological testing is required
to confirm the severity of such damage.”
29 September 2009 in point 8
“Maurice Kirk has evidence of significant brain damage …..”
29 September 2009 in point 10
When in truth the fact is Maurice kirk has already been given a normal all clear result but the deceit goes on to the final report by Dr XX of 19 October 2009 please see the extract attached.
Dr XX was the Clinical director responsible for training and controlling that doctors at Caswell Clinic did not go beyond their expertise.
But when the brain scan result is normal all clear by 28 August 2009 Dr XX knew he was being dishonest when he wrote formally to the Cardiff Crown Court as a part of proceedings to say there was brain damage while there was no evidence to say that, and if Dr XX was wishing to say there was brain damage Dr TXX knew he would have to use a doctor who medically qualified by trained and experienced in the interpretation of brain scans to provide written evidence.
Claims of Delusions and PDD Paranoid Delusional Disorder are obviously intentionally deceitful assertions that are not based on evidence.
Firstly it is not for a doctor when either writing for NHS records or giving evidence to a Court to determine facts and the decisions Courts should make.
If a person is often prosecuted or subject to disproportionate attention by police, that is seemingly unfair Parliament has decided that people should sue the Chief Constable as a means to explore issues and gain accountability. But for Dr XX to say the Claimant is delusional he is persecuted by police Dr XX would have to determine the facts of the Claimant case as being totally without merit and the Defendant has not managed to do that.
Dr XX in 2009 implies the Claimant is mentally ill for being concerned as to whether the NHS would covertly put psychiatric medication in his food as if Dr XX says the NHS could never do that so the Claimant must be mentally ill. When DR TW would have known as Clinical Director that the Nursing and Midwifery Council in 2005 and Royal College of Psychiatry in 2008 gave guidelines on when to covertly put psychiatric medication in patients’ food.
Dr XX tries to discredit the Claimant by saying the Claimant is paranoid or delusional regards occasionally using the word Freemasonry. But the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry and the oblique references the Claimant may make to Freemasonry would be no different to the National Assembly of Wales and for example one of its past leaders Rhodri Morgan who sought a ban on appointing Freemasons in some key positions. So that as the Claimant does not focus on Freemasonry any more than others the Dr XX would know there is no evidence of delusional behaviour.
Essentially every key assertion by Dr XX that the Claimant was delusional can be shown as that Dr XX knew he was being deceitful.
There is even a letter by Dr Rose Marnell 3 March 2014 (copy attached) saying there is no evidence of the conditions that Dr XX asserts the Claimant has. And indeed, many other doctors also, confirms a picture that is consistent with Dr XX being malicious and deliberately dishonest and totally deceitful.
.
New Witnesses
For example, not all in the multi-agency staff colluded but rather could not prevent what the Defendant did. Those multi agency staff from 2009 to present need to become witnesses. As well as multi agency staff who are hostile to the Claimant.
Also the Claimant out of prison is taking statements from numerous people.
The Claimant has found a letter 1 June 2010 where the Defendant refuses to investigate wrongdoing by police in the Lewis gun case based on witness statements not disclosed to the Claimant.
Defendant’s influence means endless failed Disclosure. The Claimant now requests, yet again, Court Orders for Disclosure.
Caswell Clinic
HMP Parc
Parole’s Oasysis Assessment
Police eligible data where there have been applications since 2009 with MAPPA, MG6D and PII protected evidence having been applied for many times under Subject Access Requests.
Request for an Order regards withheld evidence regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun were interviewed under caution but were not prosecuted
The Claimant requests an Order for Disclosure regards the evidence the Defendant withheld during the Lewis Gun case in 2009/10 regards Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant
South Wales Police were in close contact liaising with Police in Nottingham. That caused Mr & Mrs Cooper who purchased the Lewis Gun from the Claimant to be interviewed under caution and there are tapes and records or why Mr & Ms Cooper were not prosecuted – when the claimant was which South Wales Police had access to and knowledge of but all of which was deliberately hidden from the prosecution process, the Claimant and the trial at Cardiff Crown Court.
The Claimant seeks Order(s) for Disclosure from ‘all’ parties.
Request Disclosure of withheld statements from 2009
On 1 June 2012 Detective Inspector Holden of South Wales Police refused to progress the complaint into the Lewis Gun case when obviously there are issues that honest police would need to look at in order to maintain professional standards. But D.I. Holder inadvertently says of statements and evidence obtained by the Defendant in 2009 that were not disclosed to the Claimant in 2009.
For example as a part of the deceit the defendant uses statements from people who are not expert in the relevant issues of firearms law relevant to why the Lewis gun was legal.
SWP deliberately and deceitful used quasi-experts to mislead where quasi experts are people or staff who are not experts but rather work a speciality and can useful expertise on what they do, But the quasi expert is not experienced enough to be an expert who can comment with expertise on the wider full picture such as being an expert on contradictions and complications of fire arms law such as is found in the 2015 Law Commission report and the 2009 Consultation.
As the Home Office Consults Police forces in a consultation ending May 2009 Police knew the legal issues regards the Lewis Gun within the law earlier in 2009.
Disclosure can help show how the Defendant deceitfully and maliciously manipulated the evidence by not asking for comment to explain how the Lewis gun was legal because of it was supplied by the MOD/RAF
Disclosure can also show that the Defendant avoids issues like the debate and consultations say how any Police have a duty to assess if a gun supplied by the MOD/RAF (which can easily be modified to fire) used by genuine enthusiasts or not. But SWP police knew that the Claimant had sold a Lewis Gun he received from the MOD/RAF to enthusiasts and a museum and so no reason whatsoever to believe the gun was re-commissioned to use as a weapon.
New Evidence – Legal Advice needed on new evidence is emerging and the transcripts of the 2009 trial became available to people in 2019 who are starting to respond with information.
If the Defendant had been honest in prosecution documents and if the Defendant had not colluded with the writer of the 2009 medical reports in 2009 would not have been in prison
Now the Claimant is out of prison and not restricted in travel by licence conditions the Lewis Gun case transcripts from 2010 have become available to people the Claimant is learning more.
The Claimant needs time to put all this new evidence together and request the Directions of the Court so that the truth can be evidence at trial.
Directions on additional Further and Better Particulars to include how the Defendant manipulated and used multi agencies to harm the Claimant
In proving a case at Court and addressing accountability, establishing a trend is important to show it is not just a one-off problem.
For truth to be come evidence and to avoid issuing new proceedings with a messy duplicate civil trial the Claimant needs Legal advice on how to add the actions how the Defendant has manipulated multi agencies in 2009 onwards to the present moment and 2020, which of means also including the writer of the medical reports, and the Defendant’s lawyers conduct
It must be emphasised that the evidence that Dr XX (and so the Defendant and their lawyers) acted and still acts potentially criminally is very much more. What is said in this document is only a sample in order to be as brief as possible.
As can be seen by all this events and the have been too much for a lay Claimant to cope with such complex civil proceedings and he request the Court set new Directions so that he can manage and include all the new issues and evidence.
STATEMENT OF TRUTH
I believe that the facts stated in this application are true.
Maurice John Kirk BVSc
Date 21 January 2020
CASE NO:1CF03361
& D00CF279
IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT
MAURICE JOHN KIRK
Claimant
and
CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY
Defendant
List of Documents in Support of the N244 Application 21 January 2020
DATE
Name
Relevance
28 Aug 2009
NHS Radiology Brain Scan results.
Two doctors at ABMU NHS confirm a normal all clear result.
30 Sept 2009
Dr XX reports to the Cardiff Crown Court
Dr XX hides the above from the Court and totally makes up that this is brain damage.
19 Oct 2009
Extract of Dr XX final Opinion to Cardiff Crown Court
16 June 2010
CAA Medical says Claimant is fit to fly
Obviously Claimant Maurice Kirk does not appear mentally ill or brain damaged as Dr XX says.
28 Nov 2013
University Hospital of Wales (UHW) Cardiff
Radiology at UHW gives a normal all clear brain scan
14 March 2014
Dr Rose Marnell Clinical Director at HMP Cardiff
Says no evidence of any brain damage or PDD/delusion.
25 July 2019
Belinda Kirk (Oxford educated TV/film maker daughter of Claimant)
Writes regards the Defendant falsely saying the Claimant is a risk to her and her family when Belinda Kirk says that is not true. .
Sample of stopped letters from John Graham with stamps, from my family and from Sabine MacNeill with no party notified
The South Wales Police again conspire to pervert the course of Justice yet again by having me gaoled for almost all year only to withdraw the two charges under the Terrorism Act, would you believe!
Anything to prejudice my ever increasing number of civil claims for malicious criminal prosecutions due to their deceit and cowardly incessant bullying of me when not, again, prepared to face up to cross examination before an English law court, at long last.
DataProtection@south-wales.pnn.police.uk
15:03 (14 minutes ago)
to me
THE USUAL SOUTH WALES POLICE PREVARICATION
Good Afternoon
Please accept our apologies for the delay in the disclosure of your Subject Access Request
We are doing everything we can to minimise delays to providing a response however we are currently experiencing unprecedented challenges amid the COVID-19 pandemic which will affect our ability to meet our usual standards of compliance. Whilst we will aim to provide responses as soon as possible, we are unable to provide you with an exact date as to when you will receive your disclosure.
Please be assured that we are aware of your request.
Rheolwr Rheoli Data a Datgeliadau | Data Management and Disclosure Unit
Pencadlys Heddlu De Cymru | South Wales Police Headquarters
(: 01656 303444 | Ext: 26662 |
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>
15:16 (5 minutes ago)
MY WELSH PRISON STOPPED LETTERS
Further to my today’s URGENT BAIL VARIATION APPLICATION, based on new evidence yesterday from Mr JOHN GRAHAM (alleged recipient of ‘noxious white powder’ from my Cardiff prison cell) I now have damming corroborated facts that South Wales Police, whilst I was in Exeter prison deliberately perverted the course of justice re again stopping my prison letters to MPs, solicitor, family and Taunton GP — Maurice J Kirk BVSc Tel 07708586202 www.kirkflyingvet.com mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
It will take me a week to get through these illegally withheld prisoner’s mail by South Wales Police and G4S!
Dear Sis,
Owing to my visiting John yesterday, prior to his operation, caused me to now examine the huge pile of stopped G4S Parc and Cardiff prison letters that has been sitting on top of my kitchen cupboard since last year.
This pile almost untouched until now, kept for an ever-hopeful external police force investigation, had been set aside as I was violently ejected from prison on 1st Nov 19 in an act of robbery. These letters, meantime, were being handed back to my driver to take me directly to the nearest English casualty hospital unit across the Severn Bridge.
NB The bundle of my Cardiff Prison ‘stopped letters’ held in the F wing office, for all to see, was not amongst them . The large brown package, amongst that bundle was my two year vindictive prison term appeal from nasty judge Tracy Lloyd Jones who had the stupidity to even lie to my face when saying she could do nothing about (did not have the power’) to cause investigation into the blackmailed forensic psychiatrist’s Caswell clinic fabricated psychiatric reports that has resulted in ruining my family, veterinary and aviation way of life (see transcript) for 5 years of false imprisonment.
Your prison stopped April 19 letter to South Wales Health Board to me, for example, which is a blatant criminal conduct. My welsh police ‘interview’ will be quickly shredded this week, Avon and Somerset police must be persuaded to obtain my November 2019 101 call transcript as a classic example of the welsh police having again been refusing to divulge its content of such significant evidence undermining the prosecution’s cases including in machine-gun fiasco, to again fool the English authorities.
John informed me, after successful surgery, he never had a police interview for an MG 11 witness statement and yet I was charged and gaoled in May 2020 for sending him ‘white powder’ in a letter from my May 19 Cardiff prison cell only to be released in November. [Inadvertent tooth paste glue on back of a court transcript was the mistake].
Prison staff told me, at around that time, after a 32 minute ‘cell search’ with two sniffer dogs(while I was was locked in the shower unit in my wheel chair) it was possibly ‘heroin’ as the same powder appeared same as one sent on same day to Alun Cairns MP
Could Enid Blyton have written better?
Alun has a plethora of documentation, of course, for criminal investigations on his own South Wales Police’s yet another failed conspiracy to secure my minimum 10 year prison term. I have had Alun on listening ‘watch’ about the appalling state of welsh courts, police and prisons for years. IT resulted in my being introduced in Swansea Prison, to Nick Hardwick the then HM Prisons Minister while in my wheel chair.
(TO STOP my 1CF03361 & BS614159 one million pound damages claims resulting from first and second attempts for infinite/indefinite incarcerations)
I have been denied copy of any of my 40/50 odd letters sent out to MPs and Avon and Somerset Police during my 2019 unlawful prison time nor have I yet found any of them in this pile of stopped letters, mainly coming into prison, violently returned to me on 1st Nov 2019.
John Graham’s letter bearing all too precious 1st class stamps I was denied , so often, in wicked welsh prisonssample of my sister’s, Sabine MacNeill’s and John Graham May 2019 stopped prison letters by South Wales Police with none of us being notified
M
Copy of John Graham emails from South Wales Police
Subject: Statement
Good afternoon Mr Graham,
With regards to your previous email confirming your relationship with Mr Maurice Kirk and the fact that you had not received any mail containing a white powder, would you be prepared to provide a statement containing those details and your knowledge of a white powder discovered within letters that you believe to be toothpaste.
Regards
Dear Ms. Richards,
In answer to your enquiry I can confirm I know Maurice Kirk as an acquaintance more than a friend.
I must add I have never received any letter from him with anything resembling a “white powder” attached to it. I understand that this “white powder” in question, after formal forensic investigation, proved to be common toothpaste.
I hope this helps.
Thank you,
J. Graham
BUT THE POLICE HAVE STILL NOT DISCLOSED previously ordered, under CPR, PII, MG6D and OASYS fabricated data , the latter used, incidentally, to have me persecuted for years in welsh prison as a (fictitious) wrongly convicted victim for ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’, ,,,disgusting short arsed vermin.
MY LATEST BLOG ALWAYS ON TOP OF LIST OF BLOGS ON THE RIGHT
Welsh police confiscate my Caswell Clinic medical Records due to Dolmans’ Fraud
Appellant’s 22nd April 2020 Position Statement
1. Notwithstanding the fact that this Appellant’s contentious court cases primarily originate from South Wales with its unique jurisdiction it is never too late for a little truth, honesty and sense of fair play to prevail. 2. Notwithstanding the fact of a serious injustice concerning the division of the family’s assets, taking full advantage of his emotional mental state at the time and absence of proper legal representation, the current removing of the Respondent’s name from French property deeds was always the prime responsibility of the Respondent from the moment the UK property deeds were settled. 3. Notwithstanding the fact that the Appellant had abided by 26th March 2013 court order, within the 48 days, the other party has not possibly due to there having been no financial incentive. This has left a substantial loss for the Appellant due to his inability to sell off the French properties. 4. Notwithstanding the fact the Welsh authorities had fabricated Appellant with false criminal convictions, including child abuse, firearms and narcotics, on 1st November 2019 had the Appellant violently evicted from the largest welsh prison with his arms viciously manicalled behind his back. 5. And for what purpose? It was for interested parties, in current Cardiff litigation, to obtain an unfair advantage by the seizure of all his legal papers and not even his clothes returned to the rightful owner. 5. The South Wales Police not only unlawfully controls HMP Parc by using both extreme and unusual bullying it has ensured nothing is done about its breach of Article 2 etc and theft of Appellant’s property. 6. Despite written complaints to both Avon and Somerset or Devon and Cornwall constabularies, to even recover his legal papers for this case, he is ignored. 7. Behind this travesty of justice is their notorious 10 year ongoing 1CF03361 police machine-gun conspiracy case (T20097445). This originated from the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, to save her pension, having ordered the unblocking of the barrel of an alleged WW1 Lewis machine gun previously in alleged Appellant’s possession. 8. Not only did the welsh police ignore the advice from other police forces in England but also RAF and Farnborough Air Show previous scrutineers all confirming it was NOT a firearm and so, in desperation, even painted the film prop from film ‘Gunbus’ a different colour in the hope of fooling the jury!
Still no returning of my property in the prison so not unlike the £20,000 worth of police raid only for Chief Constable to steal in 2009 mycollection of antiques including a number of shotguns and .22 rifles all legally held and safeguarded.
UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF MEDICAL RECORDS,WHEELCHAIR, CASE AND LEGAL PAPERS FROM HMP PARC – REQUEST FOR THE DELIVERY UP OF MEDICAL RECORDS, WHEELCHAIR, CASE AND LEGAL PAPERS UNLAWFULLY REMOVED AND DETAINED AND LETTER BEFORE CLAIM – TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977
I write to request the delivery up of all of my medical records, wheelchair case and legal papers that officers and agents of your company wrongly seized and removed from me on my discharge from HMP Parc on (here give date).
These case and legal papers belong to me and I have previously requested their return.
I now demand their immediate return under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.
Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of my medical records, wheelchair, case and legal papers without further notice. In addition, I will seek an Interim Injunction for the return of the medical records, wheel chair, case and legal papers and will also seek compensatory and aggravated damages from G4S.
I would also be grateful if you could inform me if your company requires service at your registered office above at Southside or at the UK Office in Sutton?
If you have instructed solicitors, I would also be grateful if you could inform me whether they are agreeable to accept service on behalf of your company?
Dolmans solicitors Machine gun case 1CF03361 Cardiff Dear Sir/Madam, Feb 2020 South Wales Police’s Continuing Criminal Conduct So, just when and by whom those false malicious criminal convictions were first fabricated now proven by my October 2019 Parole Board hearing witnessed by Celia? How much cash do you now need simply to have returned my property from G4S Parc, Swansea, Cardiff , Bristol prisons and countless police stations & hospitals? Despite Wilding’s 1st June 09 AIG HQ meeting did it take over three weeks to interview so dangerous MAPPA registered man brandishing a prohibited Lewis machine gun?
Judge Keyser QC, apparently, is yet another one of Taffia’s hand picked replacements to Judge Seys Llewellyn QC. My 64 page 19th June 2009 BS614159 Claimant damages claim statement, to the latter, sparked off the spectacular police Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Buttercup’ using armed helicopter and 20+ raid on our home in Llantwit Major. Why, simply to take both our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve and myself into custody. (see secret MAPPA leaked notes on plan in having me shot). 2.BOTH refused to apply their judicial powers to either cause your client to have my G4S confiscated machine gun legal papers returned from HMP Parc prison or to have an outside or English police force come over the bridge and investigate this three decades of your solicitors law firm promoting nefarious criminal conduct.
HM Parole Service (Wales), despite similar such promises to help, has also ‘failed’ to retrieve any of my property following my brutal exit, in hand cuffs by 8 G4S officers from your client’s controlled ‘gravy train’. “Only acting under orders” was the reply at the time (see cctv/G4S body camera film now seized, I hope, by your police).
Judge Tracy Lloyd Clarke, I now understand, only doubled my prison term to two years in 2017 upon your client’s deliberate withholding of favourable psychiatric reports from her and the 10 + judges preceeding. Tracy will, no doubt, say that she, with theirs, had only relied on the fact I had falsely notified Cardiff ‘s Crown Court, HM Parole Board and G3S that I had criminal convictions including: a) Child Abuse b) Firearms c) Narcotics d) ABH and e) FTA and therefore had imprisoned myself as HHJ Keiser QC was heard to repeat only this month.
Judge Neil Bidder QC, on the other hand, had ordered, in your client’s wickedly secret Dec 2009 Crown Courts, that there be immediate removal of my name on your client’s category 3 level 3 MAPPA register (top 5% most dangerous). Also, my 17th Dec 09 hearing was enough for him to see why the Judge Paul Thomas trial judge had continued the nefarious conduct as far back as October 2008 when the gun was actually sold! Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, on retirement, had tried to thwart this conspiracy by ordering Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, to sign her own affidavit, would you believe.
The notorious 2010 ‘trading in machine guns’ jury trial, remember, from the police ‘plant’ amongst the 12 jury, was daily reporting back to you or one of your many minions. You knew that ALL in court had made up their minds by the end of police ‘evidence’ tendered, that all three indictments had been doomed from the very start.
BUT you, Adrian Oliver, with your ‘in house’ police HQ and G4S prison lawyers to unlawfully interfere in my custody continues to conspire for the cash as the general public, will never know ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’.
Barbara Wilding’s promise, in her 20100 six week late signed affidavit, that all CPR/ MAPPA/MG6D and PII ‘disclosure of evidence’ had been disclosed for the first of the 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. You had drafted that ‘affidavit’, another string of lies.
Remember, Adrian, your fellow brethren’s December 2009 proposed trial judge had reneged on your evil plot by overturning that wicked Judge Richard Thomlow’s deliberate multiple attempts (see all trial transcripts to be serialised on cyberspace shortly) to have me locked up for life.
YOU lot there for had that1st judge removed from any future ‘machine gun’ conspiracy hearing. What a witness that judge and jury would make in this imminent civil court trial you personally helped to concoct to avoid you and others’ deserved long prison term.
In having me locked away for life either in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric prison or some welsh similar, again, wll only highlight still further, may I suggest, to those thinkers around the world that your client’s now exceeding 60 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions, so far attempted, may promote a new problem for the obvious.
90s Judge Griffith’s Williams QC, remember, had deliberately lied to my face simply to have my name removed from the veterinary register and therefore income. He had boasted by ignoring the FACTS. Bridgend magistrates’ contemporaneous court note had so clearly recorded– that the security guard at the Vale Show had repeatedly assaulted me before thirty odd witnesses before I had to then ‘brush off his hand my arm’ ‘construed’ as assault! 13.So, just when and to whom were those above listed malicious criminal convictions first fabricated, proven by my October 2019 Parole Board hearing witnessed by Celia?
Just how much cash do you need from me and my faithful cyber space followers, for your ‘back pocket’, to simply have returned of my property from G4S Parc, Swansea, Cardiff and Bristol prisons personalty from countless welsh police stations & hospitals? 15, Why, from Wilding’s 1st June 09 AIG HQ meeting did it take three weeks to arrest a MAPPA 3/3 very dangerous man brandishing a prohibited lethal Lewis machine gun? 15 So, who else was influenced these fabricated convictions (see my paid for transcripts)? Do they a include judge in my ‘smuggling pigs, in the dead of night from Ireland by Pi[per Colt and wife, to a Cowbridge farmer’s field or included the couple of Judge Hugheses, Seys Llewellyn QC, Nicholas Cooke QC, Vosper QC, Eleri Reece, Jones, Morgan, Lewis or Williams was it, in NHS Wales? Were false convictions implicated from Taunton’s farcical Judge Neville ‘didicoy fraud’ acquittal, ‘low flying’ acquittals or Bristol’s similarly irrate judge over a purloined Taunton police officer’s personal note book from his office acquittal or Bouremouth ‘pilot in command’ conviction? Not to forget Exeter, Oxford, Japan, Texas, Breton and Newport judges iniquitous acquttals all due to your local judges to allow SWP ‘s old habits keep fuel the ‘gravy train that keep you all in licrative employment Did these now HM Parole Board proven police fabricated malicicious criminal prosecutions also influence the RCVS, CAA, FTAC and President Bush’s authorities? Maurice J Kirk BVSc
South Wales Police fabricated criminal allegations including ‘Child Abuse, Firearms (Trading in Machine Guns) Narcotics, ABH and FTA (failing to attend courts) etc
I am grateful for your seeing me concerning the police denying my Taunton GP my medical records.
My recent blog extract, below, on the decades of suffering under ‘South Wales Police Corruption’, affecting so many, points to proof of rampant criminal conduct when accountable to no one:
dav
Re-elected Taunton MP, Rebecca Pow, inadvertently caused my imprisonment in March 2019 for seven more months and only released due to the fortunate intervention by a clearly irate HM Parole Board member from London that had been lied to for two hours with my sister witnessing it all.
The Chief Constable of South Wales Police had not only allowed the fabrication of seriously damaging criminal convictions, to cause me hell in his police controlled Parc, Bridgend prison but had also ensured the list included ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘ABH’, FTA and ‘narcotics’! Police convinced my parole officer that I had sent to Stoke St Mary village, Taunton, possibly deadly anthrax spores in a prison cell letter causing it to have the village cordoned off from the public!
Would this ongoing conspiracy have anything to do with the then Barbara Wilding’s emergency 2009 MAPPA level 3 Category 3 ‘Operation Chalice’ meeting in Barry police station on the 8th of June in order to register me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK in order I may be shot?
When an armed police helicopter, with 20 odd officers, had raided our house in St Donats, while we were enjoying afternoon tea in the garden with the springer spaniels, why was I then NOT arrested?
Was this to do with my being set up to be ‘shot’ (see leaked MAPPA category 3 memos) or their failed attempt (Operation Dandelion) in snatching our 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to forced council care? It was to try and stop my civil claims, BS614159 etc, following the police’s 50 failed malicious prosecutions often denying me liberty during those decades of deliberate persecution.
South Wales Police Corruption ‘Ups a Notch’
I am arrested at my Cardiff veterinary surgery for theft of my own motor bike and gaoled in Cardiff prison for 4 days.
Poloice concoct charges of being in possession og a ‘garrotte type instrument in the pannier (embriotomy wire used on cattle dehorning on HRH Prince Charles farm and from ‘assaulting PC Philips who had thought I was possibly an escaped psychiatric patient.
This wicked police interview was deliberately withheld from all my civl proceeding for compensation with the final presiding judge refusing disclosure of any of the substantivre trial court records as they covered over 50 failed malicious criminal prosecutions. This tape was leaked revealing the level of SWP routinde corruption for which they are k nown world wide.
Would it have had anything to do with the police then transporting my decommissioned WW1 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun 2000 miles around the UK, contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act, had they not, first, unblocked the gun barrel and having her painted a different colour to fool the jury to secure a mandatory 10 year prison term for ‘trading in machine guns’?
Who out there on cyber space would like a copy of the official machine gun trial transcript for a view on the trial judge , PAUL THOMAS QC, to see how internal ‘taffy politics’ command my destiny?
[South Wales Police ref 1900195556 ‘alleged Heroin sent to Alun Cairns MP’] [I900180883 ‘alleged anthrax spores to Rebecca Pow MP]. To whom do I complain?
Police repaint gun to try and fool 2010 machine-gun jury but not before frantically driving the antique almost 2000 miles around the UK, often with only one or two unarmed police in the vehicle , contrary to regulations because the Chief Constable had bloody well known from the start, the gun was recorded in aircraft CAA log books as decommissioned and proved , before trial by the new owner.
2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun
Last time, in February 2016, His Lordship had asked me to leave the public gallery and address both he and his colleague, Mr Justice Sweeney, over my application following Mrs Kirk having been banned from ‘note taking’ on my behalf by the South Wales judge, HHJ Crowther.
Welsh courts invariably hold me behind bullet proof glass to protect me BUT primarily to make sure I hear as little as possible in the hope their blackmail may lead to my confiding in my defence information to one of their lawyers
Their Lordships bluntly quashed this one of manywicked practices carried out in the Welsh courts with gay abandon.
Will Their Lordships come to my rescue again , we all wonder, over the police’s attempt to having me shot on Barbara Wilding’s door step as one of the top most dangerous individuals in the UK?
Extract of email to my 112th law firm asked to protect me from incessant South Wales Police bullying
Can you please confirm you are still acting for me in the case AND ATTENDING WITH QC I briefed in London with a witness?
I now have new information for the judge, HHJ Tracy Lloyd-Clarke for the lawyer, from a fortunate civil hearing only yesterday, 1CF03361 (machine-gun/murder conspiracy), that should lead to the release, at last, of police MAPPA and MACHINE GUN CONSPIRACY RECORDS TO GET MY POLICE PSYCHIATRIC REPORTS FABRICATED.
HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC also helped stop my civil claims, following their 33 failed malicious prosecutions aimed at me. Now,this week ,this machine gun judge refused to order specific disclose just as in the first 33 failed prosecutions or the wrong people would go to prison.
The police QC was made to admit to HH judge Keiser that HH judge Seys LLEWELLYN QC refused to release those MAPPA minutes even when they had been delivered to court in the proverbial ‘brown envelope’ in front of me containing their plan to having me killed.
South Wales Police were now ordered to disclose HH Judge Thomlow’s documentary evidence as well that he had used at secret HH judge Bidder QC hearing in Cardiff Crown Court to have me sectioned to Ashworth for rest of my life.
Their yet to be disclosed forensic history of me contained their Caswell clinic I had diagnosed, with PROF RODGER WOOD OF Swansea university lying, that I had a brain tumour making me so dangerous….MAPPA LEVEL 3 CATEGORY 3 (top 5% most dangerous) … I must not be told…….and never have been since.
Police, this very week, were made to allow my box of records, created from my near eight months in Cardiff prison during the scandalous 2010 trading in machine-guns trial fiasco, suddenly to appear after about 5 years of apparently missing
Remember , HH Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had quickly ordered the destruction of my BS 614159 etc court records, to block a RCJ appeal, relating to my first of many substantive claims for over two million pounds, after he had refused need for both standard and specific disclosure arising from over 40 police incidents.
I had dutifully released 50 odd arch lever files for BS case and they produced not one of relevance and I am now expected me to release my intricate 2009 collated prison records of their daily criminal conduct.
Now, am I morally obliged to accommodate all these delightful people with disclosure they already have and appear to have gravitated to Cardiff’s so called law courts, civil and criminal?
The lying little bastards, in 2014, again told the court there were no bail hostels available, a habit of theirs to keep me in prison, just as they did this time , for next week’s court, ‘cannot find a welsh forensic psychiatrist to assess your fitness’.…. as South Wales medics are all too bloody scared to counter any other South Wales doctor as it is NHS (Wales) controlled and NOT NHS (England).
My sister, Celia and another, quietly made their own enquiries as to bail hostel availability, that January in 2014 both to be told there were plenty.
AND SO TO FRANCE,
. “I am just going outside and may be some time.”
Let us, before boarding, start considering HHJ Tracy Lloyd -Clarke’s Cardiff Crown Court’s hearing this week on Thursday or Friday, I forget which for the moment.
How police can withhold the truth, for eight years, surrounding my machine-gun incarceration now set up in both my T20170239 criminal & 1CF03361 civil cases to maximise world publicity of accepted routine deceit and corruption in the welsh law courts, alas, still part of the United Kingdom
extract from 2009 court transcript:
“My mistake” lying Thomlow mutters.
Lying welsh judge, Richard Thomlow, in my forced absence in cells below, informed the July 2009 court that both the seller and purchaser of my Lewis machine-gun were known to the police more than 6 months before my trial but kept me locked up to cause maximum disruption in my civil proceedings against them for their losing the first 33 malicious prosecutions, at that time, aimed against me.
As nine of the jury commented after acquittal , “Why were they not both also in the dock with Mr Kirk?”
Answer, because the court was presided over yet another corrupt welsh judge , Paul Thomas.
On 24th June 2020 Detective Chief Inspector Stuart Mackenzie of the South Wales Police was dragged out of an early lucrative retirement, the reward for what the local Taffia had told him to do, have me arrested in the hope of my receiving a 10 year prison term.
Mackenzie was to sign yet another one of Adrian Oliver’s concocted witness statements. Oliver of Dolmans , solicitors, Cardiff, had drafted a retrospective account of Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Dandelion’ in 2009 to have me ‘lawfully shot’. If that had failed the back-up police cars, also surrounding our home in St Donats, were also waiting, up the lane, with a Vale of Glamorgan social services team to take our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into ‘care’. Why? Because the clandestine MAPPA level 3 category 3 meeting three weeks earlier in Barry police station had registered me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK!
Oliver had already fabricated an oh so similar witness statement for the then Chief Constable, in February 2009, for Ms Barbara Wilding to sign as a sworn truthful affidavit. This criminal act of deliberate non disclosure of evidence sparked an early retirement, also, to protect her pension despite the blatant deceit in having me gaoled so many times only to be latter acquitted. This is why, of course, these now 20 police files have taken 11 years to reach the surface despite a string of failed court orders.
Detective Superintendent Stuart Mackenzie Retrospective Statement 24th June 12020
They had all lied by putting together Wilding’s 25th February 2009 sworn affidavit, as these 20 odd files of sensitive police material so portray but, of course, taking the lid off the ‘can of worms’ in their ‘Trading in machine guns’ conspiracy, trial T20097445, when no defence needed to be tendered for an obviously predicted acquittal.
The ‘Elephant in the Room’, no one was to mention, of course, was because their chief constable was, at the time, defending the now notorious BS614159 plus 2 civil damages claims following police having lost 40 odd malicious criminal prosecutions. My resultant civil damages claim required as many as 300 witnesses with 100 of which being police officers, serving and retired.
So, did no one in the South Wales Police simply have asked me, especially while visiting police stations after the 29th May 2009 decision by Mackenzie and MAPPA to have me arrested?
I will relish doing a second statement on how the culture of South Wales Police compels otherwise good officers to do obvious wrong on this occasion Officers are called off normal duties to answer a “Get Kirk” fatwa. Tis corrupting cultire at SWp puits the public at risk and officers more senior than McKenzie would be involved:-
The jury did not see these police at all believable or credible and here is spelling out each detail of why………
· Critical – Who appointed McKenzie as SIO?
· What was McKenzie actually to do because why such attention over a matter (couple of old cartridges with a dummy gun that if it could fire a single shot was too dangerous to actually use) is so simple a local constable could deal with by asking MK in for a chat and asking – ‘Where is this gun Sir?’
· Why does McKenzie say the policy decision of 29 May 2009 included ‘MK visiting HQ to arrest CC’ when that happened weeks later?
· If MK was to be a firearms risk …………why only with an era of gun too unsafe to fire? They show absolutely no interest in real risk of someone of MK’s clever ability going nuts and collecting real modern firearms
Why did not Mr plod simply ring me up to ask where my Farnborough Air show aircraft was now?
OR, OR ask me, while I attended the four police station visits, between 29th May and 22nd June 2009, complaining of their bullying, the time when police HQ had finally plucked up their yellow bellied courage to arrest me over three weeks later when they thought it was safe enough?
I refer, of course, to ‘Operation Chalice’ , 20 odd, some armed police, with helicopter simply to have me shot and if that failed put the bloody fear into my wife and child by using social workers, trying to take our 10 year old Genevieve into Vale of Glamorgan care?
Amazing 20 South Wales Police arch-leaver Defence Files, unlawfully hidden for over 10 years, including from my 2010 ‘Trading in Machine criminal trial , carrying a mandatory 10 year prison term, were only disclosed to me last week but only by yet another court order
A Disclosure of 20 lever arch files from the Defendant was received for me at Cardiff County Court on 12 October 2020. Dolman, solicitors’ QC told the bemused Judge Beard, residing, that Adrian Oliver, partner in Dolmans of Cardiff, that he was refusing to serve them on me in electronic form for fear his ‘busted flush’, that has earned his firm m illions of pounds, so far, since their unlawful harassment of me started in 1993 , defending successive chief constables from 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions. The nefarious conduct of his client would be all over the websites, he indicated, in a matter of minutes if disclosed electronically. This would reveal the extreme level of police bullying and criminal conduct by so that many other in positions of privilege would be also published world-wide. I refer, of course, to far too many within in the welsh judges, HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) welsh prison administration and HM Parole Service (Wales)
The 20 lever arch files start with the first 10 files covering the original prosecution papers from 2009/10. There are five files that are a defence statement by Stuart McKenzie SIO (Senior Investigating Officer) along with his attachments. There are five files that are a defence statement and attachments by the Deputy SIO Suzanne Hughes.
The evidence missing from Disclosure include
Little mention of the armed 20 plus strong police Operation Chalice helicopter raid to snatch our then 10 year old daughter or having me shot.
The Disclosure only goes back to February 2009. When the prosecution charges for both offences are dated over a year earlier:-
“…..the particulars of the offence being that between the 1st day of January 2008 and the 23rd day of June 2009, ….”
I ask for both explanations as to why such an obvious if not highly improper approach to deny Disclosure.
Also missing is…. to follow Coopers’, buyers of aircraft, with ‘gun’ detained for interrogation on 1968 firearms Act allegations of alleged offences contrary to law.
Where the Defendant fails to provide a defence or explanation
The Defendant give no defence or even an attempt to explain why they did not treat me as others and ask the CAA to contact me. I challenge the defendant to explain.
The police give no defence on anything. What was the point? There QC, Lloyd Jones had already told the court he had been informed from Judge Keiser Qc I was not going to be allowed a jury nor would the hearing of evidence take more than5 days!!!!
The police give no explanation as to why
Critical flaw in arguments
Mr Cooper purchased the gun from me in August 2008 and he and many others made various changes to the Lewis display gun in the 17 months from sale to trial.
Additionally, Suzanne Hughes is then faced with Mr Cooper’s solicitor contacted SWP to say Mr Cooper will say the gun has been tampered with.
Suzanne Hughes tries to counter the obvious need to stop the prosecution by saying Mr Scott will cast doubt on what Mr Cooper says as unreliable.
But if Police are using Mr Scot to discredit the reliability of Mr Cooper as a witness as to the condition of the Lewis display gun. Then police have absolutely no witnesses and absolutely no evidence as to what condition the Lewis display gun was at the point of sale and in my ownership before that.
It follows South Wales Police and Suzanne Hughes knew with certainty that there were no grounds to charge, remand and continue with a prosecution.
Additional questions I seek answered……. To follow with further publications of docs created during my pranks to further expose their inherent deceit.
This exposed criminal conduct is set out in these 20 odd now released police files with such things as the 20+ police strong armed helicopter raid on our home, in the Vale of G Glamorgan on the 22nd June 2009 in Operation Chalice are unlawfully omitted from files.
Aim to have me arrested/shot while the other police raid, a few hours later, to snatch our then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, also withheld from court ordered disclosure.
Also, no Nottinghamshire police criminal investigation disclosure, I had specifically asked for, in also detained Jerry and Jenny Cooper, the latter having collected the film prop from replica Battle of the Somme machine gun, many months before, police had plucked up the courage, for 27 senior police meetings in Barbara Wilding’s HQ, to press the action stations button. SUBSTANTIAL REWARDS FOR ANY INTERNAL INFORMATION from retired police…… maurice@kirkflyingvet.com tel 07708586202
A seven figure exemplary damages claim is due to come my way plus recovery of my huge costs in my defending this malicious criminal prosecution.
To be paid by the Chief Constable of South Wales Police Constabulary? No, in your dreams as Barbara Wilding, with her corrupt police officers, Adrian Oliver and others at Dolman’s, solicitors, Cardiff and other lying prosecution witnesses now face my prepared private criminal prosecutions.
The excessive perversion of justice, set out in these, until now, 20 police files, indicate a deliberately concocted plan stop my my numerous civil claims identifying welsh police’s 40 odd failed maliciously brought police criminal prosecutions,
PAY OUT TIME
All those who helped me be acquitted of all charges, requiring no rebuttal and while I was held in Cardiff prison for nearly 8 months, send in your details of costs.
Also a detailed statement on any aspect in the abuse of process of that shambolic two week highlighting any perverse issue you may have witnessed
Sky and another TV company have already expressed interest in a ‘documentary this usual and extreme level of deceit within senior staff of South Wales Police HQ in Bridgend.
contact me 24/7 on 07708586202 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
The 20 police files will be published over the next few weeks to stimulate those who know anything about the CAA causing ‘gun’s on other British aircraft being frantically decommissioned
I will be handing out Cash, lots of Cash for info also on photos of My DH2 taken in august 2008 and August 2009 etc
I have had delivered to Cardiff County Court my 25 page personal witness statement carefully written, for my readers from around the world, to simply reveal the multi thousands of UK’s funds simply to have me gaoled for a minimum 10 years, anything, just anything, to stop my million pound damages claim against the South Wales Police
the cause
for their 40 odd lost malicious criminal prosecutions case number, now blocked for an appeal , BS614159 plus 8
BUT THAT IS NOT WHY I enclose this early draft for RCJ on how disgusting the welsh penal system is- but who gives a dam other than those incarcerated ?
Exeter Crown court, shortly, will hear the outcome of John Graham’s prison stopped letters, a courtdisturbance to warrant the complainant being gaoled
As usual I buy all who attend a very good lunch, paid for in advance owing to the unusual ciecumstances all generated by the south Wales Police, chief senior prosecutor NS Evans Esq and His Honour Judge Di Evens not stopping this wicked situation from contimuing.
But, of course, the dreaded Covid 19 is endangering each of the above’s incomes with 5000 Crown court trials, is it, put on ‘hold’ so , of course they must boost their respective pensions by dragging on any futile case they can generate or however absurd and bizarre South Wales Police case they can throw at their ‘gravy train’ system.
WHY, for promotion as CPS Richard Thomlow had decided to quickly become a judge for criminally pursuing myT20097447 ‘machine gun’ criminal prosecution. Just as DC Hughes, female police officer that had sneaked into each day of my machine gun criminal trial despite, as prosecution witness, reporting evidence on oath, each day , as promised promotion which she promptly GOT!
JOHN GRAHAM, also a prosecution witness, has since tried to obtain return of his stolen communications with me, by Cardiff and Parc, Bridgend welsh prisons.
26 September 2020
REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW
Dear Mr. Jukes,
Creator of my inspiration to expose just ‘what really goes on in our law Courts’
Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.
It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself [amongst others] written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.
I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.
For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:
TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales, CF31 3SU
FROM: Mr. J. G. Graham
18 September 2020
UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:
Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:
Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:
Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945, Somerset, UK] was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:
” attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019″
Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter, it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in approximately June 2020.
My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.
The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class. My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.
I have, again, just witnessed our UK’s oh so outdated but lucrative self-generating judicial industry, Buckland’s dream for both England and Wales’ law courts to promote huge wealth only amongst themselves, if my recent scandalous court proceedings is anything to go by!
South Wales Police used HMP Parc South Wales and HMP Cardiff to obtain my five years behind bars as I had published proven facts in my many civil claims against the bullies while simply seeking compensation.
This fabricated protracted imprisonment was dependent on their now sacked police blackmailed doctor originating from their psychiatric unit by South Wales Police cruelly provoking a ‘menage a trois’ like conspiracy within their walls in order for the doctor to maliciously falsify my medical records when deemed unfit to practice.
Where South Wales Police failed fabricated prosecutions really kicked off, in 19193, to my current posting heroin to an MP in Westminster by Cardiff prison letter also doomed to failure leaving only one outstanding, apparently, so watch this space!
This simple fact has been ruthlessly covered up by no less than twenty welsh judges over the past 10 years.
Why? Back in the 90s the bullying South Wales Police had lost over 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions which had justified attempts for a mere Englishman seeking civil redress in a welsh court, gaol.
By my almost 39 years of civil claims, such as 90’s cases, BS614159 and now 8 more, are used as a proverbial ‘shuttle-cock’ between RCJ’s HM Court of Appeal and Cardiff’s so-called Civil Justice Centre, to delay and delay, so Buckland can sneakily obtain, for the land of his father’s, judicial autonomy to promote welsh avarice.
This self-promoting verbal diarrhoea, for personal gratification in our UK’s judicial system is simply a ‘smoke screen’ with those in positions of privilege answerable to no one and clearly include, ‘giving not a fig’ for their own draft ‘rule of law, current Lord Chancellor’s for his mates.
flaking police painted silver paint to fool the Cardiff Jury
Before I refer to the most recent court public scandal, all originating from South Wales perverse authorities, I touch on another South Wales Police malicious attempt to have me sectioned to Ashworth, for life, due to their failed malicious criminal prosecutions. My ‘trading in machine guns’ to ‘shoot the Lord Mayor of Cardiff only concluded with an ignominious Cardiff Crown court acquittal, requiring no defence and a fine of £50 never to be paid.
This is due in a Cardiff court on Monday, 12th October 2020 but the 10 years of unlawful failed disclosure, contrary to CPR, is common place in welsh law courts.
I made an application, nearly a year ago, to the welsh prison authorities, for the return of my very great number of prison stolen letters from within those prison walls but who cares was their reply. Some of my letters from within had even been written for my criminal appeal for a wicked severely unjust two-year prison term for simply having spoken the truth. That was why.
Can you imagine living with a false psychiatric report while trying to fly the world in some WW2 aircraft? I have been unfairly gaoled in numerous foreign counties due to this travesty of justice but not a judge in Wales has the moral fibre to resolve the ongoing situation.as all are simply waiting for me to die.
My stolen HM Royal Courts of Justice bound letters included, would you believe, even those from their own prosecution witnesses against me such is the venom within these welsh authorities. John Graham Esq’s dozen or so letters were stopped by both HMP Cardiff or HMP Parc with many full of much needed 1st Class postage stamps. He was their own prosecution witness!
The welsh have made a complete fool of the English court authorities, where that particular criminal allegation was concerned, quashed on the first opportunity once it had been transferred to England and because my letters to the then HM Secretary of State for Wales Alun Cairns, seeking help, were amongst the stopped prison letters by G4S and HMP Cardiff.
I have just been to yet another pre-arranged law court, I am not allowed to name, so as to cover up welsh authority fraud, is not the ‘first’ time for me! But to hear the presiding judge admit he could not properly consider my applications for freedom, over an 18-month period, was enough for me to gather up my court files and walk out in utter disgust.
He did not even order the release of my stolen court papers, within the stolen prison letters, despite my letting the court system know so long in advance. Was it all a big game for him as my 12th October 2020 1CF03361 ‘trading in machineguns’ claim had originated in Wales or was its one million pound civil claim was now not enough?
Apparently, it turned out that the welsh authorities, for over the past 18 months, had been circulating these my prison stopped letters, confidential legal papers and Caswell Clinic medical records, robbed from me by G4S prison staff on my 1st November 2019 to Dolmans, solicitors and CPS both defending the South Wales Chief Constable.
This meant all had to be withheld from the current presiding judge as far too embarrassing for this foreigner, like him, in an English court of all places, could not be tainted with the South Wales Police’s latest conspiracy in order to pervert the course of justice.
An early draft of my laboriously explaining, I am afraid, on how high ranking welsh police in the Vale of Glamorgan, due to their pensions now being at real a serious risk, (by locking me up for 5 years) had fabricated for me a MAPPA level 3 category 3 registration in order to stop my civil claim and if possible, having me shot in front of my wife, Kirsty and Daughter, Genevieve…. Oh yes, and who is next?
Fabricated following their having lost over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions while having my name removed from the veterinary register, on welsh police say so, using the remaining 11% from some 113 criminal allegations within nine years.
This machine -gun civil claim ,on Monday 12th Oct 3030 should be quite interesting in Cardiff’s Cardiff’s so called Civil Justice Centre
Hear is an earlier rough draft of about half of my my personal statement simply setting out exploring their deceit in some greater detail
This below Caswell Clinic fabricated data of Glanrhyd Hospital, Bridgend, was used in a secret Cardiff Crown Court hearing where I was unlawfully denied access when not even legally represented.
All while the fabricators of their chief constable’s machine-gun conspiracy are laughing all the way to the bank.
PLEASE READ WHAT HAD ME GAOLED FOR FIVE YEARS AND DESTROYED MY FAMILY
36.1 have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of his plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk’s mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self-awareness, judgement, decision making, self-regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his ‘ problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence.
37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court I would consider him fit to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant matters.
38. Maurice Kirk’s current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the Criminal Justice System, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with Mental Health Services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.
39.1 I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulty for the court. I am also aware of the difficulties the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk’s perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk require in-patient hospital treatment, I have concerns that a Medium Secure Unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a High Secure Hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of Special Security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk’s communication with and encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.
40. Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit
Patrick Cullinane Esq, Sir Norm Scarth RN, WW2 Arctic convoy survivor and Dame Sabine Macneill of email fame I hope you are all ‘sitting comfortably’ and I will begin…what I am about to ‘publish and be damned’
We now have a spokeswomen in The House to get this thoroughly badly drafted evil Act to be chopped up, burnt at the stake, hung , drawn and quartered and even rescinded
Labour MP Claudia Webbe has been charged with harassing a woman.
Ms Webbe, who represents Leicester East, is accused of one count of harassment between September 2018 and April this year.The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the 55-year-old MP is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 11 November.
Ms Webbe has said she is “innocent of any wrongdoing” and that she will “vigorously” defend herself in court.Labour has suspended Ms Webbe from the party and the party whip following the harassment charge, the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg understands.A Labour Party spokesperson said: “It would not be appropriate to comment on an ongoing case.
“Jenny Hopkins, from the CPS, said: “The CPS has today decided that Claudia Webbe, MP for Leicester East, should be charged with an offence of harassment against one female.”The CPS made the decision after receiving a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police.
“Ms Webbe was elected as an MP in December’s general election, taking over the seat previously held by Keith Vaz.She remains a councillor in Islington, north London, since 2010, and was also a member of Labour’s National Executive Committee.Earlier in her career she acted as an adviser to Ken Livingstone when he was Mayor of London.
Patrick Cullinane Esq suffered an early death due to this wicked Act
Sir Norman had to early exile to Southern Ireland for fear of his life at 90 odd
Dame Sabine of email creation at Cerne laboratories had a ridiculously harsh 7 year prison term while I was let off with only a mere 5 years in the stench of welsh prisons.
As with the others named above, simply for publishing the truth a concept in life, incidentally, difficult to comprehend by those in authority where I once struggled for decades, South Wales, simply trying to practice veterinary surgery and bring up 1st and 2nd families without fear of reprisals.
I definitely GOT that bit wrong. South Wales has a climate tainted by deceit a concept in life, incidentally, where truth’ for them is difficult to comprehend.
I WILL HELP FUND THE STARTING OF A CAMPAIGN TO RID MY COUNTRY OF THIS MODERN EQUIVALENT OF THE 60s ‘SUS’ LAW simply for the POLICE TO LOCK AWAY THOSE WHOSE WHO ARE SIMPLY TELLING THE TRUTH
To: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales CF31 3SU
26 September 2020
REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW
Dear Mr. Jukes,
REQUEST FOR INTERNAL REVIEW
Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.
It is believed the S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged and remanded in custody connected to the letter addressed to myself written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having allegedly a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The criminal charge of the letter which was attempted to be sent to myself has subsequently been dropped by the CPS.
I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.
For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:
TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales, CF31 3SU
18 September 2020
UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:
Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:
Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:
Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945 Taunton, Somerset, UK was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:
“attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019”
Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in June 2020.
My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.
The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class. My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.
Labour MP suspended from party after harassment charge, Sky News understands Aubrey Allegretti, political reporter 4 hrs ago Trump 2016 campaign ‘targeted 3.5m black Americans to deter them… Gwen Stefani and Blake Shelton make surprising revelation about time in…
Labour MP Claudia Webbe has been suspended from the party after being charged with harassment against a woman, Sky News understands.
In a statement, the Crown Prosecution Service said it made the decision to charge the Leicester East MP after receiving a file of evidence from the Metropolitan Police.
It added: “Criminal proceedings against Ms Webbe are now active and she has the right to a fair trial.
“It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.”
Ms Webbe, 55, will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 11 November.
She is accused of carrying out the harassment between 1 September 2018 and 26 April this year.
Ms Webbe said in response: “I am innocent of any wrongdoing and look forward to proving this in court.
“I will be vigorously defending myself against these claims.”
A Labour Party spokesperson said: “It would not be appropriate to comment on an ongoing case.”
At least 40 now, identified as stopped by HMP Cardiff and G4S run HMP Parc
Thoroughly evil Cardiff court, police and welsh prison lying bsds now blocking video
REQUEST FOR AN INTERNAL REVIEW
Dear Mr. Jukes,
25 September 2020
Seeing as I am denied my F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / Data Protection Act request sent already [and attached to this message] to yourself, and after receiving the letter below [attached also] from a Mr. Jason Jenkins, a “Disclosure Officer” of S. Wales police I hereby ask for a formal internal review regarding the denial of my request.
It is believed Mr. Jukes’ S. Wales police force does have the letter referred to in my request as Mr. Kirk was criminally charged [and remanded in custody] regarding the letter addressed to myself written by Mr. Kirk whilst previously resident in prison earlier in 2019, the letter allegedly having a possibly noxious “white substance” on it. This letter was stopped from being sent to myself by prison authorities / police at the time. The charge has subsequently been dropped.
I have already sent 3 forms of ID pertaining to myself after your request for ID.
For your information, the addition / amendment not sent with my written request, which was sent to Mr. Jukes at the S Wales police HQ at Cowbridge Rd. via recorded delivery R. Mail, is:
TO: Chief Constable of S. Wales police: Mr. M. Jukes, Police HQ., Cowbridge Rd., Bridgend, S. Wales, CF31 3SU
FROM: Mr. J. G. Graham
18 September 2020
UPDATE TO MY F.O.I.A. / D.P.A. Request to the Chief Constable Mr. M. Jukes, dated and sent 17 Sept. 2020:
Dear Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of S. Wales police:
Please refer to my F.O.I.A. request to you, sent via R. Mail and also attached to this message. I apologise for leaving out an important part of my FOIA / Data Protection Act / S.A.R. request to you – that is:
Mr. Maurice Kirk [d.o.b. 12/03/1945, at present residing in Taunton, Somerset, UK] was charged by the police in mid-2020 with:
“attempting to send a substance which caused distress to another [approx. May 2019] – the letter was stopped from leaving the prison last May 2019”
Mr. Kirk was in prison at the time of sending this letter, it being addressed to myself prior to it being stopped from leaving the prison, by authorities. This charge to Mr. Kirk was subsequently dropped in approximately June 2020.
My FOIA requests asks for a copy of this letter which was stopped as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] – as it obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself. I request any other letters pertaining to myself that were not sent to me from either HMP Parc or HMP Cardiff from Mr. Kirk, during the times Mr. Kirk was resident in either of these prisons, whether they had any alleged “substances” on them or not.
The letter relating to the charge that was dropped for Mr. Kirk was referred to in part by the S. Wales police officer who wrote by email to myself – a copy of that email dated 06th July 2020 from officer “Brynsley Richards” of S. Wales police being sent with my 1st and original FOIA request letter to you sent on the 17 September 2020 via Royal Mail Recorded Delivery 1st class. My F.O.I.A. request and attachment is attached to this email.
