As predicted in such a thoroughly corrupt welsh judiciary my eleven year running civil claim against the South Wales Police machine gun bloody nonsense conspiracy, the T2009745 criminal jury laughed out of court despite the police plant amongst them they told us about in the Cardiff pub afterwards. I now appeal with the aid of a barrister who has appeared to have poked his head over the parapet!
AS PREDICTED, SOUTH WALES POLICE ARE AGAIN BLOCKING MY REVEALING VIDEOS
The relevant practice direction is Practice Direction 3C, which provides for three kinds of civil restraint order, a limited civil restraint order, an extended civil restraint order and a general civil restraint order. A limited order may be made where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit.
An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit.’
A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate.’
The Defendant cites the order of Morgan J in BS614159, an order some 8 years old. In fact an application was subsequently lodged before Newey J by the writer and that learned judge made no such criticism. They cite the order of Tipples J dated the 3rd September 2021 and the order of HHJ Petts dated the 17th September 2021 refusing the Claimant’s application for witness summonses and specific disclosure.
The ‘without merit threshold’
The Defendant relies on Ghassemian Hamila Sartipy (Aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc (2019)EWCA Civ 225 a case wherein the Appellants had perpetrated fraud on both the Respondents and the court and whose application was manifestly bogus. That is not the situation here.
It is averred the Respondents have had conduct of one of the most shameful chapters in the history of South Wales Police after the Lynette White Cardiff 5 trial. It is accepted that the Claimant has become overtly suspicious of judges and lawyers, has been constrained to litigate in person because of the sheer enormity and costs implications of the task before him and has frequently used florid language in accusing judges, courts and the police of being in partnership against him. None of these factors should be held against him against the highly unusual and alarming circumstances of BS614159 and 1CF03361 which, if they had been visited on any other single human being would have undoubtedly caused a reasonable onlooker, armed with the facts, to conclude all the Claimant’s claims were both meritorious and justified.
The Claimant was a practising vet and highly respected, even employed by South Wales Police. He was a daredevil aviator but one whom the Civil Aviation Authority saw fit to allow to fly and participate (as recently as 2016) in Vintage Air Rallies. Notwithstanding representations by The Defendant that the Claimant brought prosecutions upon himself the Defendant managed to attempt to arrest, charge or prosecute him on no less than 33 occasions and each attempt was wholly without merit (BS614159). The Claimant invited a holistic approach, even pleading that 1CF03361 was the ‘end-game’ of BS614159. He was to be disappointed. The sheer volume of material before it persuaded the court there ought to be two trials and not one. His Honour Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC faced a daunting task but invited each incident to proceed as though in isolation of all the others permitting witnesses each time to deny their knowing Maurice John Kirk so there was no ‘over-arching’ conspiracy to do him down. With the deepest of respect, that was not necessarily the realistic approach. On oath during the recent trial in 1CF03361 DC Stuart Davies accepted most police officers were certain to have heard of the famous flying vet, Maurice John Kirk. The statistical probability of 33 incidents all being pure accidents prompted Mr. Justice Jack to question the sheer volume as heposed the question what is going on?
The Claimant does not accept the judgment in BS614159. Would any other person in his shoes? Does that make his applications to appeal without merit? Surely not. Matters progressed with 1CF03361. In that matter the Claimant’s case was that the case notes of Operation Chalice revealed South Wales Police resurrected the Claimant having a vintage aeroplane as BS614159’s trial date approached. They prosecuted his having a prohibited weapon with extreme prejudice. The timing was significant. Case notes purported to show officers conspicuously and suspiciously searching the Claimant’s legal papers in search of evidence of a gun sale 12 months in the past so as to preserve the integrity of the organisation. The Defendant denied the magistrates’ decision to grant the Claimant bail and procured his remand in custody for no less than eight months.
Matters took a more sinister turn. On the 8th June 2009 at Barry Police Station (the hub of all activity in BS614159) a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) set in motion a categorisation of the Claimant that was wholly unjustified. As someone who was MAPPA 3 he was now a danger to himself and others. A psychiatric report by a tame expert could have resulted in the Claimant being incarcerated in a mental institution for life. That tame expert’s report was contradicted over the years that followed by no less than five other psychiatric reports. What would the proverbial ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’ make of all this?
Inevitably the Claimant was acquitted. This case was brought by the Claimant who invited the court to consider the following matters:
Mr. Rydeard (Forensic Expert) accepted he had in his many years witnessed only a handful of collectors such as The Claimant prosecuted in this way. Why was he?
Former Detective Superintendent McKenzie accepted he instigated MAPPA so why did the court find he ‘mis-spoke’? Why was this admission ignored?
If the ‘machine gun’ had been a real automatic why were Home Office ACPO Guidelines against prosecution in the public interest not adhered to? Why did the court not allow the Claimant to rely on these as part of his case when they had both been pleaded and served in October 2020 by him?
Section 58 Firearms Act 1968 provided a statutory defence to the Claimant. There was no way of showing the Claimant as opposed to others modernised the exhibit. Three witnesses attested to the fact that the gun had been tampered with.
The Defendant could provide no explanation as to why the gun appeared to go to Chepstow Forensic Science Services. Did the Police make the gun capable of firing? A crucial witness did not attend trial suspiciously yet his evidence was accepted by the court even though the Claimant challenged his evidence.
Firearms expert Mr. Rydeard said ‘once a machine gun always a machine gun’. The exhibit could not be ‘down-graded’ by subsequent modification. When confronted by the Birmingham Proof House certification the exhibit was a ‘single shot gun’ both Mr. Rydeard and the court leapt on the explanation Litts the Sportsman had a capacity to modify the gun when there was evidence this certainly was not the case.
It is true the Claimant further feels aggrieved that his request for trial by jury was formally pleaded by him as long ago as 2011 and yet he was denied. He argued the Defendant be estopped from denying him his statutory right by dint of their pleaded response in their 2011 Defence. The Particulars of Claim were amended and a fresh Defence permitted. It was disingenuous to say that request was ten years old.
Of course any litigant in the Claimant’s position would seek to obtain redress. If these claims and applications were without merit then why were they allowed to go to trial by senior judges exercising their court management powers? Why was the machine gun case kept alive for in excess of ten years? Why was the Defendant afforded the luxury of Leading Counsel at great public expense if all one was fronted with were the ramblings of an idiot?
Most disturbing of all, why was the Defendant’s continued conduct in having the Claimant incarcerated in recent years (again without merit MP Exeter Crown Court prosecution) permitted to prevail so that the Claimant was denied Relief from Sanctions when he was incarcerated and documentary evidence served on the court showed they had stolen all his case papers whilst in prison?
The Claimant renewed Leave to Appeal The Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey’s refusal to grant Relief from Sanctions and to allow the Claimant trial by jury. Great play is made of the observations of Tipples J on the 3rd September. With the deepest of respect if, as claimed by the Learned Judge, the Claimant had failed to request an oral hearing why any hearing before Tipples J at all? Why did the Defendant file a document entitled Respondent’s skeleton Argument for Oral Permission Hearing 3rd September 2021? The Claimant will aver matters were not assisted by the fact his legal representative could neither hear not understand Tipples J because of technical difficulties.
In conclusion, if any ECRO is granted the court merely compounds the Claimant’s overall position that he was deprived of the right to call evidence, deprived a fair trial and all the indicia of bias he is told are but phantoms of his mind are, regrettably, fact.
My MP is still ignoring my letters for help over South Wales Police G4S Robbery
Despite guidance from my judge, His Honour Judge Johnson in Exeter Crown Court, for me to write to my MP with regards to the brutal attack in HMP Park, Bridgend, to steel my ‘machine gun’ civil claim papers for the South Wales Police, I am continuously ignored.
I wonder just how many others in the constituency are being ignored by the same MP when their specific pleas for help are on matters as serious as mine?
There stands a restraining on me which is illegal as my two acts of writing for help were a year apart.
All my attempts to have a restraining order varied or quashed remain ignored by the courts. Such is the true state of our law courts should you be so bold or so stupid as to scrape off their thin layer of camouflage to expose, yet again, the ‘can of worms’ lurking beneath in our UK judiciary
The South Wales Police have consistently instigated barbarity, by G4S for example, ever since my Bristol lawyers, upon a comment from a Bristol judge, that Dolmans, solicitors for the Welsh police, should mediate and ‘settle out of court’ for losing over 40 now malicious criminal prosecutions.
Adrian Oliver of Dolman refuses each time or the taxpayer funded ‘gravy train’ will hit the buffers.
The masonic devil worshipping bunch in Bridgend’s police HQ were caught red handed in June 2009 when, while the deputy head of their legal department assisted me to their then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding’s private office, lo and behold was Adrian Oliver also attending, no doubt, for both Gold Group and MAPPA level 3 category 3 clandestine meeting to have me eliminated.
My ten year running BS614159 substantive civil claim, for the forty odd lost criminal prosecutions, was listed for trial that very summer and so had to be stopped by their ‘machinegun’ conspiracy.
Hence the hurriedly arranged HQ MAPPA meeting on the very day I had accessed Wilding’s inner sanctum, to ‘exchange witness files’, only to be surrounded by machinegun tin hatted police sporting stun grenade laden flak jackets and itchy fingers. Real Enid ‘Noddy Land’ stuff had it not been so true
My two recent farcical South Wales Police instigated failed jury trials, in Exeter Crown Court, are so serious a miscarriage of justice, a restraining order had to be immediately applied to block ‘what really goes on’ in the dark corners of the House of Commons and damned the expense!
Just as in the Welsh police doctor’s fabricated 19th Oct 2009 psychiatric report, for my Ashworth incarceration for life, the tax payer must never find out that our UK law courts have nothing to do with the veracity of the presiding judge or HM Crown Prosecution Service as it is all run under ‘HM Partnership’, as Patrick Cullinane Esq so aptly coined it, a multimillion funded ‘ gravy train for those in the club all promised to immunity to prosecution , such as one Adrian Oliver and his entourage.
Will you help me, please or do I have to stand against an idle bitch living off immoral earnings?
Yours truly,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
South Wales Police NOW ask for my new Restraining Order!
The relevant practice direction is Practice Direction 3C, which provides for three kinds of civil restraint order, a limited civil restraint order, an extended civil restraint order and a general civil restraint order. A limited order may be made where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit.
An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit.’
A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate.’
The Defendant cites the order of Morgan J in BS614159, an order some 8 years old. In fact an application was subsequently lodged before Newey J by the writer and that learned judge made no such criticism. They cite the order of Tipples J dated the 3rd September 2021 and the order of HHJ Petts dated the 17th September 2021 refusing the Claimant’s application for witness summonses and specific disclosure.
The ‘without merit threshold’
The Defendant relies on Ghassemian Hamila Sartipy (Aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc (2019)EWCA Civ 225 a case wherein the Appellants had perpetrated fraud on both the Respondents and the court and whose application was manifestly bogus. That is not the situation here.
It is averred the Respondents have had conduct of one of the most shameful chapters in the history of South Wales Police after the Lynette White Cardiff 5 trial. It is accepted that the Claimant has become overtly suspicious of judges and lawyers, has been constrained to litigate in person because of the sheer enormity and costs implications of the task before him and has frequently used florid language in accusing judges, courts and the police of being in partnership against him. None of these factors should be held against him against the highly unusual and alarming circumstances of BS614159 and 1CF03361 which, if they had been visited on any other single human being would have undoubtedly caused a reasonable onlooker, armed with the facts, to conclude all the Claimant’s claims were both meritorious and justified.
The Claimant was a practising vet and highly respected, even employed by South Wales Police. He was a daredevil aviator but one whom the Civil Aviation Authority saw fit to allow to fly and participate (as recently as 2016) in Vintage Air Rallies. Notwithstanding representations by The Defendant that the Claimant brought prosecutions upon himself the Defendant managed to attempt to arrest, charge or prosecute him on no less than 33 occasions and each attempt was wholly without merit (BS614159). The Claimant invited a holistic approach, even pleading that 1CF03361 was the ‘end-game’ of BS614159. He was to be disappointed. The sheer volume of material before it persuaded the court there ought to be two trials and not one. His Honour Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC faced a daunting task but invited each incident to proceed as though in isolation of all the others permitting witnesses each time to deny their knowing Maurice John Kirk so there was no ‘over-arching’ conspiracy to do him down. With the deepest of respect, that was not necessarily the realistic approach. On oath during the recent trial in 1CF03361 DC Stuart Davies accepted most police officers were certain to have heard of the famous flying vet, Maurice John Kirk. The statistical probability of 33 incidents all being pure accidents prompted Mr. Justice Jack to question the sheer volume as heposed the question what is going on?
The Claimant does not accept the judgment in BS614159. Would any other person in his shoes? Does that make his applications to appeal without merit? Surely not. Matters progressed with 1CF03361. In that matter the Claimant’s case was that the case notes of Operation Chalice revealed South Wales Police resurrected the Claimant having a vintage aeroplane as BS614159’s trial date approached. They prosecuted his having a prohibited weapon with extreme prejudice. The timing was significant. Case notes purported to show officers conspicuously and suspiciously searching the Claimant’s legal papers in search of evidence of a gun sale 12 months in the past so as to preserve the integrity of the organisation. The Defendant denied the magistrates’ decision to grant the Claimant bail and procured his remand in custody for no less than eight months.
Matters took a more sinister turn. On the 8th June 2009 at Barry Police Station (the hub of all activity in BS614159) a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) set in motion a categorisation of the Claimant that was wholly unjustified. As someone who was MAPPA 3 he was now a danger to himself and others. A psychiatric report by a tame expert could have resulted in the Claimant being incarcerated in a mental institution for life. That tame expert’s report was contradicted over the years that followed by no less than five other psychiatric reports. What would the proverbial ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’ make of all this?
Inevitably the Claimant was acquitted. This case was brought by the Claimant who invited the court to consider the following matters:
Mr. Rydeard (Forensic Expert) accepted he had in his many years witnessed only a handful of collectors such as The Claimant prosecuted in this way. Why was he?
Former Detective Superintendent McKenzie accepted he instigated MAPPA so why did the court find he ‘mis-spoke’? Why was this admission ignored?
If the ‘machine gun’ had been a real automatic why were Home Office ACPO Guidelines against prosecution in the public interest not adhered to? Why did the court not allow the Claimant to rely on these as part of his case when they had both been pleaded and served in October 2020 by him?
Section 58 Firearms Act 1968 provided a statutory defence to the Claimant. There was no way of showing the Claimant as opposed to others modernised the exhibit. Three witnesses attested to the fact that the gun had been tampered with.
The Defendant could provide no explanation as to why the gun appeared to go to Chepstow Forensic Science Services. Did the Police make the gun capable of firing? A crucial witness did not attend trial suspiciously yet his evidence was accepted by the court even though the Claimant challenged his evidence.
Firearms expert Mr. Rydeard said ‘once a machine gun always a machine gun’. The exhibit could not be ‘down-graded’ by subsequent modification. When confronted by the Birmingham Proof House certification the exhibit was a ‘single shot gun’ both Mr. Rydeard and the court leapt on the explanation Litts the Sportsman had a capacity to modify the gun when there was evidence this certainly was not the case.
It is true the Claimant further feels aggrieved that his request for trial by jury was formally pleaded by him as long ago as 2011 and yet he was denied. He argued the Defendant be estopped from denying him his statutory right by dint of their pleaded response in their 2011 Defence. The Particulars of Claim were amended and a fresh Defence permitted. It was disingenuous to say that request was ten years old.
Of course any litigant in the Claimant’s position would seek to obtain redress. If these claims and applications were without merit then why were they allowed to go to trial by senior judges exercising their court management powers? Why was the machine gun case kept alive for in excess of ten years? Why was the Defendant afforded the luxury of Leading Counsel at great public expense if all one was fronted with were the ramblings of an idiot?
Most disturbing of all, why was the Defendant’s continued conduct in having the Claimant incarcerated in recent years (again without merit see Exeter Rebecca Pow prosecution) permitted to prevail so that the Claimant was denied Relief from Sanctions when he was incarcerated and documentary evidence served on the court showed he had stolen all his case papers whilst in prison?
The Claimant renewed Leave to Appeal The Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey’s refusal to grant Relief from Sanctions and to allow the Claimant trial by jury. Great play is made of the observations of Tipples J on the 3rd September. With the deepest of respect if, as claimed by the Learned Judge, the Claimant had failed to request an oral hearing why any hearing before Tipples J at all? Why did the Defendant file a document entitled Respondent’s skeleton Argument for Oral Permission Hearing 3rd September 2021? The Claimant will aver matters were not assisted by the fact his legal representative could neither hear not understand Tipples J because of technical difficulties.
In conclusion, if any ECRO is granted the court merely compounds the Claimant’s overall position that he was deprived of the right to call evidence, deprived a fair trial and all the indicia of bias he is told are but phantoms of his mind are, regrettably, fact.
Tomorrow morning in the machine gun case the QC for the South Wales Police will have ‘arranged’ that no more damaging evidence comes from his remaining witnesses
He will be allowed to oppose an adjournment for PC Brown and Foxy to give vital evidence on how my replica gun was hawked around the UK for over 2000 miles trying to get someone to certify it as a prohibited weapon when, already, RAF, Nottingham police and Chepstow Forensic Services certified the pieces of iron ware as scrap iron!
Further to my text earlier today, asking for vast amounts of police deliberately failed relevant data to AGAIN be applied for in court tomorrow, I am still unclear as to why ‘relief of sanctions’ blocked by judge Keiser et al now prevents any of this new incredible evidence heard this week not trigger more disclosure under CPR?
The remarkable level of deceit by senior South Wales Police officers must trigger the obvious disclosure behind the reasons for such an unusual and extreme level of malice by Barbara Wilding and others , too many to mention here.
Where is, for example, 21st June 2009 police ‘Operation Orchid’ disclosed data as it is not mentioned in any of the court files other than by me?
Where are, for example, the senior police written orders for staff to carry out the criminal conspiracy, when meticulously recorded in personal police pocket note books and typed in MAPPA , OASys, PII, MG6C, Gold, Silver and Bronze officially kept Home Offices records.
I never needed any civil claims like this or BS614159 and ten others for compensation had these records been originally disclosed.
AND what about the hidden police investigation over the February 2009 fabricated Adrian Oliver (Dolmans) deliberately falsifed Chief Constable affidavit that sparked my eight months incarceration???
Operation Orchid , you will remember, was when police raided our home with armed helicopter and 20 plus many armed police streaming out of the undergrowth and with marked police cars all briefed to have our ten year old daughter, Genevieve, snatched by Vale of Glamorgan and Cardiff Social Services and for me to be shot, lining up outside our front gate with firearms.
The English police forensic data is currently withheld with key officer Brown allegedly now ill as ARH1 was examined by them BEFORE the welsh ‘got their dirty paws’ all over it to squirreled it away for days to Chepstow FSS for you know what!
‘Foxy’ must also give evidence, as ordered, with voice copy and transcript of her telephone conversations with my both then wife and me when pretending to buy a prohibited weapon Same for alleged Foxy voice heard in court this week.
Both Kirstie and Genevieve had ringside seats on the 21st June 09 raid, Operation Orchid
South Wales Police lied again to Somerset, Avon, Devon & Cornwall police
The deliberate destruction of the highly revealing police officer’s bodycam was to bury the false South Wales Police data that was passed to PC Oliver Sevlik, on the roadside to obstruct the on going fascinating, even for me, machine gun damages claim in Cardiff’s County Court
Violently arresting M5 Motorway police part redacted witness statement
I am Police Constable 6878 SVETLIK of the Devon and Cornwall Police currently stationed at the HQ Roads Policing and Armed Response Hub. On Wednesday 2nd June 2021 at approx. 1330hrs I was on duty in full Police uniform in company with PC 7141 GREENSITT under callsign Y8ZE.
At that time we arrived near marker post 242.7 on the M5 Northbound to assist PC 8078 HINDSON who had located a male who had been reported to have been walking on the central reservation of the M5 motorway.
I had heard one of her radio transmissions before we arrived informing comms that the male would not co-operate with her and had been walking in the live lanes and that she needed assistance. On arrival I activated my body worn video serial number P15912 and found PC HINDSON speaking with an elderly and unkempt male who appeared to be trying to fill his car with diesel from a plastic fuel container which had no spout.
His vehicle was a red French registered Citroen C4 registration number towing a trailer. I asked him what he was doing and he informed me he was filling his vehicle with fuel. I informed him that running his vehicle fuel so low that it broke down on the motorway was very dangerous and could be considered as Careless Driving. He told me he had been in lane 3 at the last exit and due to the traffic had been unable to exit the motorway.
The male was very unsteady when he walked and I was concerned that he was unfit to drive the vehicle. I asked him if the vehicle was his but he would not answer me. I asked several times if he had a driving licence and insurance for the vehicle but again he would not answer me, then he stated he did have insurance but didn’t have it with him at the roadside.
I asked his name but he would not provide it. He then went to the front nearside door of the vehicle and retrieved a large kitchen knife with a rainbow effect blade which he used to cut the top off a plastic bottle to use as a funnel for the fuel. He put the knife down and then returned to the fuel cap area. I asked why he had a knife in the car and he stated “TO CLEAN MY FINGERNAILS”. He continued wondering around the car unsteady on his feet and repeatedly refusing his details.
As a result at 1336hrs I arrested him on suspicion of driving a motor vehicle on a road with no insurance and no driving licence and cautioned him using the “WHEN RESTRICTED (when complete) MG11 Witness Statement Page 2 of 2 Continuation of Statement of Oliver James SVETLIK Signature: Oliver Svetlik Signature Witnessed by: N/A 05/2012 RESTRICTED (when complete) QUESTIONED” caution to which he made no significant reply. I applied my cuffs to the male’s right wrist as he had been in possession of a knife, had so far been unco-operative and would not provide me with his name so that I could risk assess transporting him without cuffs.
I tried to apply them in a rear stack but the male seemed to be inflexible and in some pain, so I re-applied them in the rear back to back position and checked them for fit and told him not to struggle against the cuffs or they may cause him discomfort.
I then put him in the rear of PC HINDSON’s vehicle. At 1349hrs I further arrested him on suspicion of possession of a sharply pointed/bladed article in a public place and reminded him he was under caution. On the male’s wrist was a hospital patient wristband from which I took the details of Maurice KIRK born 12/03/1945. When I spoke to the male and called him either Mr KIRK or Maurice he responded which tended to suggest this was his name but I was unable to confirm this. He still would not provide his home address.
He was then transferred to another vehicle and transported to Exeter Custody Suite by PC GREENSITT and PC 7830 KNIGHT. KIRK arrived at Exeter custody suite at 1400hrs and his detention was authorised.
In custody he provided an address……….. However, he was also in possession of paperwork in the name of Kasper KIRK,,,,,,,,,,,,. When asked who Kasper KIRK was he replied “THAT’S FOR ME TO KNOW AND YOU TO FIND OUT”. On checking KIRK’s driving record he was showing as holding an Expired Substantive Licence.
South Wales Police Damages Claim – Batting Order
11/09/21 EnquiriesExeter Crown Court R. v. Maurice John Kirk Case No T20210178
I write regarding the above prosecution concerning alleged unlawful possession of a knife and two motoring charges.
I have been served with a section 23A Notice of Withdrawal in respect of these charges by the CPS, and therefore take it that I am no longer required to attend the court in terms of the bail granted by the Magistrates Ct when transferring this case to the Crown Court. I understand that this Withdrawal Notice has also been sent to the court.
I would therefore apply for a Costs Order in principle from Central Funds under section 16(2)(a)(a) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.
I therefore await a decision of the court as to whether I am to be awarded costs from central funds before sending any details of the costs incurred for consideration and assessment. I would suggest that a hearing be fixed for consideration and determination of this cost application.
I will attend your 17th September 21 court to be paid the outstanding £4000 odd out of pocket expenses from the South Wales Police;s maliciously brought prosecution of stalking my very own conservative Taunton MP
The monies are needed to finance this Monday’s barrister, Mr David Leathley, in the linked 1CF03361 South Wales Police ‘machine gun’ malicious criminal conspiracy currently proving the level of deceit the SWP are prepared to stoop to in order to keep their pensions. I await hearing from the court
Andrew Huxtable proven as South Wales Police Liar for ‘Targeted Malice’
In the Cardiff County Court’s today’s 4th day of unlawfully restricted trial, while denied a jury, my inalienable right in so simple case of proven police malicious conduct, police HQ’s gun expert Andrew Huxtable looked visibly shocked, while on oath. on how I had ‘got my hands’ on his June 2010 Decommissioning Certificate issued by the Birmingham Proof House confirming ‘no work’, what so ever, had been needed to be done on prosecution exhibit ARH1 after my obvious to be acquittal in February2010 Cardiff Crown Court.
Of course not, as the Nottingham police when, first obtaining my sold film prop imitation ‘ 1916 Battle of the Somme’ Lewis machine gun, had just come from the RAF and flown by myself at the 200 Farnborough Show as part of my replica DH2 biplane
earlier this week I was forced to make a private person’s arrest, NOT A ‘CITIZEN’S ARREST’ on the ring leader of the South Wales Police’s concocted targeted malice, retired Chief Superintendent Stuart McKenzie while asking him to quietly accompany me to to the nearest police station where I would, as usual, ;lay information.
Malice recorded in forty odd failed failed malicious criminal prosecutions, since the 1970s, had come to a head following my having flown my WW2 Burma War army 6a Auster aircraft through the roof of a Haverford Wes aerodrome police car.
Police had tried to obstruct our winter flight to Ireland for a a week-end of duck-shooting and attend the County Fermanagh Harrier Hunt Ball. Police had even resorted to having a Mk 7 Hawker Hunter fighter aircraft to be ‘scrambled’ from RAF Brawdy, near by, such was the inept unexplained welsh hatred of an Englishman repeatedly exposing their inherent deceit, found in some of those in their unique types of authority.
The learned judge’s ‘passing shot’ at the end of yet another day of welsh lies was if Huxtable had even travelled with PC Dodge to personally witness the complete contradiction of his sworn evidence , concerning the state of prosecution exhibit ARH1, why no armed police accompanied such a lethal prohibited weapon to Mr Rydiard, the gun expert at the Birmingham Proof house?
Apart from being contrary to Home Office regulations it transpired that Mr Huxtable’s filming of the film prop during the ‘strip down’, investigating senior police officers had quietly destroyed the incriminating evidence!
nothing new under the sun’ when the target of south wales Police routine nefarious criminal conduct.
In court tomorrow, 10thSeptember 2021, ex army Mr Rydiard will even produce his laboratory evidence that even the prosecution exhibit had no machine gun barrel as it was not side vented to cause rotation of the ammunition magazine and was a condemned barrel from a double choked 0.40 inch gauge squirrel garden gun.
Senior South Wales Police had even withheld Huxtable’s criminally belated January 2010 2nd witness statement upon the specific advice of their QC (quaintly corrupted), Mr Lloyd Jones and mastermind in this 30 years of evil, co defendant, Dolmans , solicitor, Adrian Oliver who are earmarked to be be arrested when they least expect it.
Police Solicitor and Master Mind
Huxtable’s 2nd 2010 statement had also been deliberately been withheld from their targeted victim and eight lady twelve man jury in Jan/Feb 2010 as Huxtable had unwisely, possibly, let it be known in police HQ that the machine gun ‘ammunition’, I had deliberately left on my office desk on top of my anticipated needed 64 page defence statement explaining all- rather like Sir Alec Guinness in ‘Seven Crowns for Seven Coronets film.
The targeted ‘machine gun’ malice had been hatched as far back as my 4th October 2008 letter to the police solicitors, corrupt Dolmans who, had this criminal conspiracy been in an English court of law, both co-defendants would have been before criminal and civil jury trials.
The QC also knew, in 2009, my paper weight of my 1944 marked .303 rounds, dug up in my Brittany garden, had a diameter so narrow that, when Huxtable had tried to fire them at Chepstow army rifle range, possibly, ( all evidence of Chepstow FSS visits withheld by McKenzie and then chief inspector Frances? as each ‘bullet’ had both not seated in the breach but had rattled all the way down to the the choke at the muzzle as the garden gun barrel was for MANUAL breach loading NOT automatic fire
Instructions for my prosecuting barrister to include:
Demand Foxy give evidence.
Demand police officer, purported to be ill, give evidence
Demand English police’s, in Nottingham, forensic examination data,, created BEFORE the welsh put their slimy little mittens on the film prop imitation WW1 Lewis machine gun. be disclosed
Demand recall of Stuart McKenzie in the light of Huxtable lies implicating Dolmans fraud
Demand exhibit AH1 and AH2 and any others, deliberately withheld from the original Cardiff Crown Court jury, Huxtable rounds that rattled down the ARH1 gun barrel
Demand the Chepstow FSS (Forensic Science Services) and adjacent Army unit’s ARH1 records of their involvement with the purported De-Haviland Two dummy gun during the mysterious two days while it was off the audit trail the jury said, in the pub, had convinced them, so early on (se2cond day) in the daft Cardiff trial) orchestrated by barristers Ace and Richard Thomlow!
Demand the RAF paperwork created when RAF Lynham and RAF Farnborough had handed back the prosecution exhibit to a member of the general public, the first to an aircraft engineer and the second to me after meticulous scrutiny
Demand the coup de gras act of disclosure, protected using the Nuremburg excuse, when all pleaded, in being cross examined by my barrister, David Leathley Esq, their Gold , Silver and/or Bronze police HQ orders from more senior officers, including Barbara Wilding and MAPPA agents, including Dr Tegwyn Williams, now voluntarily deported to New Zealand, sacked chief South Wales Police forensic psychiatrist from Caswell clinic , the records of which were violently robbed from me by G4S run HMP Parc. This very relevant civil claim in Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre, on 13th September , G00TA220 Maurice v G4S Custodial Services, to be heard at the same time!!!!!!!!!!
Demand the obvious ‘trailing barrister; for ‘equality in arms’, Magpie, to attend the next day’s hearing at my expense
this list is not exhaustive
Incidentally,
TRIAL DAY ONE
The learned judge refused me the right to make notes of my thoughts while the barrister was leading me through the South Wales Police conspiracy in my ‘evidence in chief’
[ This appears to be contrary to my success before our Lord Chief Justice Burnett at the RCJ when case law was made allowing the mere mortals , like you and I, being now allowed to take notes while sitting in a public gallery of a criminal law court in england and Wales.
This had followed from HHJ Crowther’s threats of immediate prison if my then wife, Janet, did not stop writing my cross examination evidence, on oath, from another South Wales Police conspiracy following my being arrested for ‘entering a welsh prison without permission’].
DENIED A JURY WHILE AN ENGLISHMAN PROVES FRAUD IN A WELSH COURT
Remember, this police conspiracy was in the drastic shadow of 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions brought by the same welsh police with my alleged ‘trading in machine guns’ jury civil trial being their desperate last ditch attempt, coup de gras, to block my 7th January 2010 listed 1BS614149 damages claim that would require at least 200 police officers as witnesses.
High Court, on 3rd September, denied me my inalienable right to having a jury despite a request in my Particulars of Claim filed with the Cardiff court in 2011
At Police HQ where I gained entry to Barbara Wilding’s Office to spark Operation Challis to have me shot
The police at the gate are searching for the2 ‘machine gun’–the senior police idiots, why not ask me and I would of told them exactly where it was in Lincolnshire
Alex with Snipe just before my DH2 WW1 replica with decommissioned Lewis machine gun flew at the 2000 Farnborough International Air Show following a specific order from Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 fame.She is desperate to block my civil claims or lose her pension
My time line written in Cardiff gaol for 8 months until acquitted and re arrested that same night, incidentally, having spent the evening in the Cardiff pub, called the HA HA, with some seven very ‘unsteady on their feet jury ladies and one jury man all now worn out with laughter
The police ‘plant’ on the jury , they had recognised, did not attend the party!
This police interview extract’. below, is an indication for the trial tomorrow should anyone wish to come along-I usually buy lunch for every one if time permits
MG at Secret police laboratory in Chepstow to tamper with the evidence, unblock the barrel of the dummy gun and paint it back to the colour when I owned it in order to fool the 2010 Cardiff crown court jury
‘Nothing new under the sun’ where South Wales Police criminality is concerned
Why is the Dummy Machine Gun found at Chepstow’sForensic Services Laboratory?
On 7 April 2009 intelligence report of MJK holding gun in Aug 2008 photo
In March 2009 MJK attends magistrates and asks the court, having filed with it a copy of Dolmans, solicitors’ falsely drafted Chief Constable’s Feb 2009 sworn affidavit, to have the matter listed for an urgent private prosecution.
On 30 May 2009 intelligence report MJK also attends South Wales Police HQ, Barry and Bridgend police stations to serve BS614159 witness summons on 40 odd police officers.
With my same complaint left before magistrates, that Barbara Wilding’s affidavit was six weeks late and contrary to His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC’s November 2008 court order that there was to be full CPR disclosure in the current BS61419 one million pound plus damages claim.
MJK arrest was at 0810 hrs in Llantwit Major, on Mon 22nd June 2009
Late same evening the ‘gun’ is handed over, on M5 Motorway, to unarmed Nigel Brown who returns with it to Bridgend HQ.
Early Tuesday, 23 June 209 Nigel Brown takes dummy to A Huxtable at Bridgend’s police HQ where it is stripped and photographed HO style
OR Huxtable ‘ignores’ Home Office orders, he is to examine and film the ‘dummy gun’ but gets it to Chepstow’s Forensic Services
Neither the 2010 jury nor MJK were told of this Chepstow examination by another forensic laboratory during the 2000-mile ‘hike’ of it around the UK
ALL WELCOME at the Cardiff civil justice centre and I BUY LUNCH AND REMEMBER, CARDIFF COUNTY COURT STAGES variety ACTS, LIKE MY BS614159 FARCICAL DAMAGES CLAIM, AS A BRIAN RIX WHITEHALL FARCE
The cps man, Mr Rendle or Randle, played the road incident’s nasty police man’s body cam to himself while live in court in virtual mode, from some office in the UK, BUT neither magistrates nor I were aloud to see or HEAR it……a gross abuse of process which is why I said, “right I have heard enough of this nonsense and picked my papers, consisting of the days daily Telegraph and stomped out of court threatening to attend the 3rd September hearing when the ‘gloves will be off”
and so the South Wales Police perverse conduct continues unchecked
Written by an observer today
MAURICE WALKS OUT OF COURT – Today at the 23 minute Exeter magistrates ct hearing the prevarications and dictates and railroading from the court, along with the total ignoring of Maurice’s explanations and requests, led to Maurice leaving the court during the hearing, and who could blame him?
Disclosure of the charges facts was denied to Maurice [CPS denied giving disclosure as it is believed it would “undermine their case”] – only a summary was available – which Maurice disputed. In other words: Maurice is disallowed the very details of the case[s] against him, even the police-worn body worn video camera footage is denied!!] and what he was arrested for.There were 3 charges:
1] “possession of a bladed article” [large kitchen knife] on 2 June on M5 motorway [CPS prosecuting “Chris Rendell said this was amenable for a summary trial] – the clerk then said the matter would be dealt with at magistrates court level, unless Maurice wished otherwise.
Maurice was then asked did he wish for the matter to be dealt with at magistrates and he declined stating “jury trial”. Maurice was asked time and again over the 23 minute hearing would he be getting a legal rep., which, ultimately, was left unanswered as the question of 2 years worth of costs regarding the case whereby he was a acquitted recently is still in limbo and not dealt with – completely unfair and possibly very illegal.
Legal types demand paying to represent one and hardly ever come at a reasonable and proper price – most accused defendants are not millionaires and legal reps. charge unearthly amounts and if someone in the halls of power decides theyre withholding the defendants costs for a recent case then paying expensive legal reps. at a later date [such as this case] is put in question.
All is carefully thought out by these public servants – and not always in the favour of citizens such as Maurice Kirk.Alarmingly, the 2nd + 3rd charges [“driving his car without a valid licence” and “valid insurance”] have already been dropped, and Maurice was asked how he would plea – he said he was unable to as,[with disclosure by the CPS being denied also] he was “a little confused” as Taunton magistrates had already “quashed those charges” and, what’s more, “last year the police dropped those same charges” too.
The astonishing resurrecting of these 2 charges in this present court case surely shows something clearly wrong, and shows ultimately how far the prosecution will bend the rules regarding prosecuting someone when those very charges have been dropped BY 2 SEPARATE AUTHORITIES.
Regarding the charges Maurice stated he was never given a “producer” by the police on the 2 June [to produce his documents at a police station within the time period allotted] so it seems that, oddly, the CPS have re livened the “no licence + no insurance” charges after they already had been dropped merely to bolster their “knife possession” case and help Maurice into jail yet again via another sentence. This obviously highly questionable adding of these 2 already deleted charges surely needs serious scrutiny into them by honest responsible parties.
South Wales Police instigated again, of course.
Taunton, a month ago……. my car is confiscated as my having ‘no driving licence’, later returned to me and told to drive away but the crowd of police refused to examine the kitchen knife I told them I had in my car!
I had told the Exeter Magistrates, to day, I had only returned to England at a cost of over £1000 just to plead if I was given a copy of the police body cam of the incident then I would know how to plead
I was refused as did the court refuse my tendered my defense statement explaining why I had good reason of having, not one but two kitchen knives in my vehicle.
Incidentally, having just won last month’s jury trial, brought by the South Wales Police concerning three charges, sending suspect anthrax and heroin from my Cardiff prison cell to Members of Parliament, it was of no surprise to be told my costs awarded, to cover £4000 out of pocket expenses, was a mere £237 because I had not asked for Legal Aid!!!!!!!!!!!
Now stopped by 17 police in routine police road check of vehicles they refused to examine the knives I was carrying in my car and told to drive away. Now work that one out!
The 3rd September, now there is a memorable date!
Ironic, post MP stalking acquittal?
TODAY’S EMAIL TO EXETER CROWN COURT
This order you sent to me appears to be only a partially filled in T2020177 costs order for only £257 allowed for my two years of ‘out of pocket expenses’
I must have a fully filled in costs order, please, for the RCJ’s MoJ department or it will reject it and especially as the latest farce in Exeter magistrates court yesterday appears to be a repeat performance and heading down the same route.
Welsh courts, of course, never ever gave me a penny of costs over 30 years in the south Wales Police’s 40 odd maliciously brought failed prosecutions as I am English so all this costs jargon now, at my age, is quite a ‘minefield’ to me
The 2012/13 change in the rules on Legal Aid, due to lawyers etc fleecing the taxpayer as unaccountable, indicates that had I applied for it at commencement of prosecution, two years ago I would have been reimbursed for the £5000 odd ‘out of pocket’ costs.
Remember, my alleged sending from my Cardiff prison cell ‘white powder’, believed to be anthrax, to an MP and John Graham Esq and heroin to Alun Cairns MP, I would have been reimbursed the £5000 odd in full but Operation Bridger, Operation Chalice and the South Wales Police unlawfully blocked all that. It stinks, does it not? — Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202
Maurice,Do you want to win up to £5,000 this month?We are giving you the opportunity to do just that, by launching our biggest super draw of the year so far – Our Annual Conservative Summer Draw.
Ironic, my Conservative MP, despite Exeter Crown Court’s order to respond, continues to ignore my letters for help re G4S run HMP Parc robbery of my ‘trading in machine guns’ substantive civil claim legal papers
ReplyForward
Meanwhile
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>
11:03 (20 minutes ago)
Holborn Adams solicitors and attending QC to be sued in Taunton’s County Court
I suspect fraud and ask for advice from Law society following the theft of my £5000 by the above purported Hatton Garden fronted money laundering lawyer gang
This email was sent to the ‘money laundering’ department’ of the Law Society
extract from today’s letter to Bristol County Court
Good morning, I have spent more hours today on this following the recent judges order to re submit N244 application and fee. I spoke to James, of payment dept, just now reluctant to take my money as I have received, already, a sealed 25th July 2021 set aside receipt for hearing. Last time at your court you made me pay £700 for a court fee that was, I said at the time, ultra vires and it took months to get my money back with multiple visits to the court office with no apology Exactly the same games I have experienced with 1Cf03361 (machine guns conspiracy) and T2020177 (Taunton MP conspiracy) etc CASES ALL FLOWING FROM SOUTH wALES pOLICE criminal conduct that successive courts and my Taunton MP deliberately ignore Who in London in Operation Bridger and Operation Chalice is behind this decade of criminal conduct or do I have to join the devil worshipping brethren?
REPLY FROM LAW SOCIETY
Dear Maurice J Kirk,
Thank you for contacting The Law Society, the independent professional body for solicitors in England and Wales.
The Law Society cannot investigate complaints about its members and cannot become involved in individual cases or offer legal advice.
If you have complained to your solicitor about poor service and you are not satisfied with their response, you can contact the Legal Ombudsman on 0300 555 0333, or by visiting their website:
If you have complained to your solicitor about breaching the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct and you are not satisfied with their response, you can report them to the SRA on 0370 606 2555, or by visiting their website:
Kind regards, Abid Rahman Customer Services OfficerMembership ServicesThe Law Society113 Chancery Lane,London,WC2A 1PL Tel: 020 7242 1222 www.lawsociety.org.ukGo green – keep it on screen This email and any attachment(s) is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use including further processing, for example; printing, forwarding, storage or copying is not allowed. If you are not the intended recipient, please let the sender know as soon as possible and then delete all copies from your e-mail account. Please note the sender is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Law Society by email.
Please find enclosed my application to vary/strike-out a restraining order served on me on 20th may 2021 brought despite yet another acquittal requiring no defence.
It is almost a unique experience in being granted ‘costs’ by the presiding judge as in South Wales, over these past three decades, only £200 was once mistakenly granted by a visiting judge but never released to me, of course.
This protracted level of bullying by the welsh police covers well over forty failed malicious South Wales Police criminal prosecutions with my latest acquittals, ‘trading in machine guns’ police conspiracy and now this similar South Wales Police concocted ‘Harassment of an MP’ conspiracy again proves that it is long overdue for an MP instigated HM Ministry of Justice public enquiry. — Maurice J Kirk BVSc
The Exeter Crown Court jury was denied any more South Wales Police gathered incriminating evidence to be disclosed (see prison officer’s witness statement below inadvertently slipped to me) which I suspect was a major factor in my obviously predicted acquittal.
Readers, may I suggest this another example of ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’, unpublished
Police ‘s further harassment of me, due to the acquittals, is my 1st July 2021 Exeter Magistrates hearing for ‘found in a public place with a bladed knife’ and driving without appropriate licence and insurance.
Today’s ridiculous information, I barely heard today and now on public world wide record, there needs to be an urgent public enquiry into the nefarious, nay, mendacious psyche of too many inherently deceitful South Wales Police, Cardiff & Park prison and court officers.
If ‘the rule of of law’ is to be upheld for our 1948’s Convention of Fundamental Freedoms and Human Rights’, contrary to war-monger Blair’s 1998 version who had deliberately expunged two paragraphs, then I may stop bleating on about the state of our antiquated law courts.
“Taffy was a welshman, Taffy was a thief, Taffy came to our house & stole a leg of beef“
Please note this particularly applies to a significant section of welshing ‘authorities’ who had gained great pleasure in coming to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons in a minibus.
In 2002, out of shear spite, welsh police had gone to London to consistently lie on oath following their losing over 40 malicious criminal prosecutions.
The Chief Constable’s mandatory 10 year prison term machine gun conspiracy for me had been hatched by Barbara Wilding in 2008 but not before first handing in her notice to avoid loss of her lucrative state pension. My half dozen or so, compensation claims from police harassment, while I was peacefully trying to simply practice veterinary surgery, in the Vale of Glamorgan, triggered their Plan F or was it Plan ‘G’?
This was because my BS614159 etc civil claims had just been listed for January 2009 for 200 odd serving and retired police officers to be cross -examined by me.
My imminent 2009 civil damages claim trial clashed, by apparent coincidence, with the laughable ‘trading in machine guns’ jury trial, requiring no defense what so ever.
South Wales Police had frantically attempted playing their ‘Gulag card’ to have me locked away for life in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric prison using their rogue forenscic psychiatrist (soon sacked to South Island New Zealand) from the the notorious Caswell Clinic in Bridgend.
‘habits die hard’.
To help avoiding asking for Legal AidI have reserved seats in the public gallery for a fee
I make formal complaint of South Wales Police perverting the course of justice , again, now trying to block my September 2021 jury civil trial for substantial damages , case number 1CF03361, following its collapsed ‘machine gun’ malicious criminal conspiracy while asking for my 10 year mandatory prison term.
REMEMBER, the 43 failed South Wales Police prosecutions, case no BS614159 etc and then trying to use the seller and subsequent buyer of alleged ‘prohibited weapon’ as prosecution witnesses after first having unblocked the barrel and painting the heap of scrap iron a different colour to try and fool the jury. This latest gross abuse of process comes to my family as no surprise whatsoever.
1. 13/07/09 Pss 54886 instructions to police HQ’s Andrew Huxtable, to video exhibit ARH 1 replica film prop machine gun, has deliberately not been disclosed. Why?
The firing mechanism had been purloined back in the 70s when I first visited the owner, Viv Bellamy, at Lands End aerodrome.
2. The contents of the stripping of exhibit was also not been disclosed nor explained to the jury as to why not.
3.A Huxley’s 4th Jan 2010 witness statement, written just days before my 2010 jury trial, was also unlawfully withheld from the jury and me in 2010 as a deliberate act of perverting the course of justice when knowing the condemned smooth bore of the 0.410 garden gun barrel (prosecution exhibit ARH1) was simply a film prop for film, Gun-bus.
4. Even YOUR CPS TOLD ME BOTH WELSH PRISONS ARE NOW DENYING CONFISCATING MY LETTERS TO Alun Cairns MP and John Graham etc when the hurriedly prepared 9th April 2021 Prison officer Darrell Davies’s statement, only triggered by 3rd party intervention, late confirms the criminal conduct by Dolmans, police solicitors of Cardiff.
5 I wish to know, in writing, why the Welsh prisons lied in keeping no records of my letters, in and out of my cell, while I was a prisoner in Cardiff, Parc and Swansea prisons since 2005?
6. Can you obtain my stolen letter logs from Welsh prisons of my letters to MP?
7. As for my other stolen Welsh prison property, stolen by G4S, relevant also to my Thursday Taunton and Friday Cardiff court hearings, can you obtain for me in time?
8. What is my current FTAC status and when did it change?
9. What is my current MAPPA status and when did it change?
10. Please name all the agencies and specific individuals linked by 2009 MAPPA level 3 welsh police station meetings to have section and locked away for life. How I can I contact them for when we may next meet?
Thankyou
Ps please can I collect, today, a cd copy of my 1st August 2009 police interview at HMP Parc re dropped charges?
Pps What was the makeshift glue, incidentally, found on my purported prison letters to MP?
Today, two years too late South Wales Police disclose it stopped many more of my prison mail from HMP Cardiff and G4S’ HMP Parc than previously admitted,
CPS (England) in the post to me today reveals the true level of deceit in the Welsh authority’s conspiracy in May/June 2019 , confiscating my mail without my knowledge, until now, to my doctor , family, courts and MPs there to help me in this 24/7 criminal conduct.
a sample of hidden evidence to disrupt my civil claims against the South Wales Police
‘Bad Character’ Scrutiny at Last!
I had the privilege of meeting Nick Hardwick Esq, then HM Inspector of Prisons, in HMP Swansea while I was serving an alleged ‘breach’ of a restraining order that I knew nothing about until I was arrested !
The rogue Caswell Clinic doctor, in Bridgend, South Wales, with wicked liar Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University , who had put the forensic psychiatrist ‘up to it’ in the first place, together had concocted a MAPPA3/3 report in order to have me locked away for life in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital if not ‘shot’ which was actually the case , in police Operation Challice. [see leaked MAPPA 3/3 leaked memos of Barry police station’s 8th June 2009clandestine cabal of corrupt crooked celtic coppers, once more.
By stating my ‘brain damage’ was so significant, causing PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disorder), in believing the welsh police were acting unlawfully, was all blamed on my having ditched in the Caribbean in my WW2 D-Day Piper cub and from being a ‘long term’ drinking partner of actor, and veterinary client, Oliver Reed Esq, it would prevent the Crown Court from allowing me to cross examine police witnesses.
This was not the first time I had witnessed the corrupt Celtic coppers collude in conspiracies to prevent the truth coming out before a jury and nor would it be the last.
I would win the scandalous allegation, the then ‘trading in prohibited weapons’ conspiracy led by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, as it had been hurriedly cobbled together to frustrate my damages claim resulting from my 40 odd acquittals proving malice aforethought.
War monger-er, Tony Blair’s almost first statute law passed by The House was the ill conceived 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act designed, in haste, liked the Dangerous Dogs and Hunting Acts to now leave so much misery within our country’s community.
My letters to both the blackmailed now sacked NHS (Wales) doctor and Alun Cairns MP were a reflection of a member of the public being a victim of the cruel state of South Wales’s Judiciary driven by greed and appearing answerable to no one and especially the ‘rule of law’ respected here in England.
Alas, my letters to Alun Cairns , for over a decade were to record for any future high profile HM Crown Court, is just what I want now, with alun, to indicate as to ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts.
Had Boris kept us in the EU for just a little longer, to get an orderly withdrawal, I was convinced serious needed reform would have occurred to our antiquated self servicing England and Wales penal code driven by avarice by those in positions of invincible prejudice.
Get police evidence and you will win BUT if you fail, you will lose
For twelve years have been patiently waiting for the opportunity for an English court of law to examine the overwhelming evidence that I was never served a’ restraining order’ before it was breached but instead, I have uncovered a level of deceit and intrigue beyond imagination practiced daily in the Wales law courts.
P Crean Esq, T20200177
Cardiff Crown Court T20097445
Wales
6th April 2021 Your ref T20170239
Dear Sir,
FICTITIOUS SERVED RESTRAINING ORDERS
I repeat my application to have ‘varied’ outstanding purported restraining orders in my name
I asked for D Leathley Esq, Barrister at Law, to represent me in Cardiff Magistrates but he was refused even sight of the court files, in open court, of my 1st Dec 2011 and later purported varied ‘restraining, as the court records had been found to be unlawfully tampered with.
On 9th April 2021, before an Exeter Crown Court judge, I will be asking His Honour to study, initially, my numerous witnesses accounts, including those from HM Crown Prosecution Service officers and eye witnesses from the public galleries, confirming that I was neither in court each time and nor did I know about their content until I was arrested and gaoled.
I will be applying for all relevant welsh disclosure of court documents at the hearing unless they can be released to me, by email, before Friday, please? I have copies of forgeries in files.
If you indicate I was ‘served’ correctly please, when, where and by whom and who were present as witnesses at the time?
‘Above is an extract of the transcript from the secret 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, held in my forced absence, whilst unrepresented, fabricated from the start that I was ‘dangerous’.
However, just in time for my future jury trials but only by a cock-up in Cardiff’s County Court, caused explanation of the Dr xxxxxxxxxx, sacked Caswell Clinic forensic psychiatrist, stating I was mentally ill at the time, so as to stop the already doomed ‘machine-gun ‘jury trial carrying, of course, the mandatory prison trerm of ten years.
Only by January 2021 did I discover the full extent of South Wales Police’s criminal conspiracy while I was in Cardiff prison’s F block just days before the comical machine gun trial.
Huxtable had been told to hide the HM Home Office mandatory video he took in SWP HQ, in Bridgend, of his ‘[sripping down’ the ‘gun’ knowing it was not a ‘prohibited weapon’at all.
‘Inherent deceit’ and ‘cheating on the rugby field’ is little of what I personally witnessed in my informative years at Taunton School and why my mother,from a direct line of Captain Morgan, cried so much when she heard I had bought a veterinary practice in the Vale of Glamorgan.
This document was withheld from me and the jury
This document was withheld from me and the jury
This document was also withheld from me and the jury revealing the ‘gun’ was never a ‘prohibited weapon’
is to be called for May 2021 jury trial as both my ‘character’ and ‘defence’ witness in the current criminal and civil proceedings (1CF03361) emanating from the South Wales Police’s criminal conspiracy revealed in T20097445 ‘trading in machine guns’ Crown Court fiasco will expose.
There I was acquitted, without need of a defence, as the police only revealed this year the ‘prohibited weapon’ was a film prop replica WW1 Lewis machine gun certified by Birmingham Proof House as a single shot 0.410 condemned gardening gun! All to disrupt my compensation following 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions by withholding Huxtable’s 4th Jan10 witness statement stating even the barrel was too wide to retain even rim fire o.303 rounds!
So desperate were the South Wales Police, at trial, it had both unblocked the unrifled barrel and had painted the exhibit ARH1 a completely different colour to when I had owned it in order to try and fool the jury. This whole matter now needs a police investigation from England
Yours truly,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
John ‘s letter was about getting me a lawyer outside Wales
No wonder the South Wales Police were examining each and every sealed and unsealed letter of mine from HMP Park and HMP Cardiff
Andy, please do not leave Avon & Somerset Police on my account
In The Criminal Court of Appeal RCJ case no. 201704259B4
Royal Courts of Justice, Machine-gun claim 1CF03361
Cardiff Crown & 25 yrs police harassmentBS614159+
County Courts (Cdf cabal’s cover-ups)
Wales UK [The hatred of the English is palpable]
19th May 2018
FAO Clerks of the above UK Law Courts,
South Wales Police failure to disclose evidence is routine & deliberate
“If you don’t want the defence to see it, then it goes onto MG6D” a list of sensitive unusedmaterial which the defence doesn’t have access to”. Police “have been trained to put items on there (MG6D) that they do not want disclosed to the defence”Quote fromCdfChief Inspector
The Times, Centre for Criminal Appeals (CCA)’s, Cardiff Law School’s ‘Innocence’ project, Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate’s & Inspectorate of Constabulary’s dossiers, re ‘police disclosure evidence’, were all submitted to London’s HM Justice Select Committee
“Officers put undermining material on the MG6D list to hide it”
These are just a few of the undisclosed facts, themselves hidden but now ‘surfaced’ following a Freedom of Information Act application, in relation to an ongoing investigation in Cardiff.
Suzanne Gower, solicitor and Managing Director at the CCA said, “These documents show why the responsibility for providing full and fair disclosure must be taken out of the hands of police and prosecutors. The truth is they see themselves first and foremost as adversaries to the defence and in some cases, deliberately withhold exculpatory evidence”.
The South Wales Police have lost over 50 malicious prosecutions against one victim, with 89% of its first 113 allegations struck out by 2004. Subsequent prosecutions, of greater concoction, needed ‘machine-guns’ and ‘radio isotopes’ injected into their victim’s brain for a MAPPA level3 category3 for Ashworth high security psychiatric prison eligibility, for life.
Their 1993 victim had naively employed lawyers for an obvious ‘an out of court’ settlement scenario but Cardiff’s cabal refused to even ‘negotiate’ cut & dried facts! Their tax payer funded ‘gravy train’, with all it’s unchecked money from point of ‘arrest’ to ‘deals’ tonight in prison, was just too good to be true. Our Welsh judiciary’s real purpose is as a huge money-making commercial enterprise. This rampant fraud is not investigated so those in positions of privilege can continue abusing their MAPPA so called ‘authority’ to keep bullying victims.
Cardiff Crown Court Protocol to Remove/Vary a Restraining Order
Why is ‘protocol’ riddled with court directions this Applicant has already been denied?
Is current ‘protocol’ as in 2012 1st trial & since machine-gun conspiracy hatched in 2008?
1(e) Request previous Dr Tegwyn Williams’ statements repeatedly refused him by CPS
2(a) Request court log records copy in 4(5) ‘restraining order’ trials & Cardiff magistrates 1st Dec 2011 ‘harassment’ conviction , before & after ‘re-written’, redacted or destroyed
Why was ‘harassment’ conviction exhibit ‘switched’ and court records falsified, thrice?
2(c) Request copy of a law enforcement competent to obtain Dr Williams’ & Dr Hillier’s statements re 1st March12 ‘harassment appeal’ & why 2nd ‘breach’ ‘arson’ trial stopped?
2(d) Request copy of cited ‘Sentencing Guidelines’ (not in court letter) as needed for Applicant’s 1(c) statement of ‘better particulars’ in these 25 years of deliberate injustice
2(e) What’s the purported past & current relationship between Applicant & Dr Williams?
3(b) Request CPS ‘case papers’ of the 2011’ Cardiff chaotic ‘harassment’ conviction and as to ‘where, when and by whom’ purported ‘retraining orders’ were drafted & ‘served’?
Will it include guard’s & court clerk’s (hiding in cell) ‘notes’ of 1st ‘service’, in corridor on crutches while surrounded by 4 armed MAPPA guards or 2nd ‘service’ in victim’s cell or 3rd ‘service’ at ‘gate arrest’ (6 witnesses again)? Judge Curran refused any disclosure
Will 5th jury see lovely Inspector Lucas’ 4th RO ‘service’ warning re hidden ‘restraining order’ or her 5th’service’? [She recorded Dr TW/m-gun complaint, all ‘buried’ of course].
3(d) Why were Applicant’s antecedents still wrong for 14th Dec17 ‘sentencing’ hearing?
Why then, was he MAPPA registered or again registered and not informed and not now?
Why ‘varied’, by whom and with whom, from its 2008 inception, if not to be vindictive?
Why again false antecedents if not to block his release to progress his civil police claims?
Why did ‘sentencing’ judge have ‘no authority’ to direct that GMC be notified of fraud?
Why do police refuse disclosure via his lawyers and Criminal Cases Review Commission? Why for 3rd time court has asked and allowing his letters and complaints, in past 25 years, be ignored if not complicit? Disclosure of this relevant evidence will avoid need of a 5th jury trial
Why1st jury refused jury notes data for a court then deny existed? Leverson LJ & Melling J, at RCJ appeal, were deliberately lied to (see transcripts & The Sun article), why?
Why is Applicant still denied MAPPA ‘minutes’ of machine-gun meetings to kill him?
This level of hypocrisy means ‘the rule of law’ is replaced by ‘political expediency’ under the legitimacy of its unusual MAPPA & Freemasonry devil worship, so who will be next?
When did court have this ‘protocol’ typed for ‘striking out’ or ‘varying’ a restraining order?
Who’s explaining ‘variation’, when, where and by who served, to allow web site publication?
Why does HM Crown Prosecution Service refuse CD data release, concocted for his 1st 2nd 3rd 4th and 5th ‘breach of a restraining order’ jury trials, while Legal Aid prisoners here are ‘in possession’ of theirs? Why did magistrates refuse his lawyer’s the right to apply for legal aid?
HM Prison Wales is where the young leave in a far worse shape, to respect society, than when first entered. Which bureaucratic ‘back-hander’ ensured this Buntlines holiday camp mentality, if not to fuel the judicial ‘gravy train’? None available to ‘privately funded’ victims
Why does NHS (Wales) withhold Professor Rodger Wood’s deceitful Caswell Clinic ‘brain damage’ report? Did it fool Dr Williams enough to concoct his Applicant’s 19th Oct medical report? Is this why, in secret 2nd Dec court, no machine-gun ‘strike out’ but all MAPPA was?
Did Dr T W ever state the Applicant was a ‘risk’ to the general public? No. The only ‘risk’ was to the Chief Constable if he pursued his 50 police failed malicious prosecution claims, including the Caswell clinic ‘break-in’(for corrected medical reports). Why machine-gun trial not stopped when Barbara Wilding had it re-painted to fool jury using transvestite, ‘Foxy’ & after victim was imprisoned for days on pretext he was ‘unidentifiable’ by clients?
Cardiff refuses to process his 50 police failed prosecutions, machine-gun & Caswell ‘break-in’ damage claims and at 7.42 a 4th May ‘court order’ was put under cell door, post stamped 10th, making it 27 hrs too late to appeal. Judge had refused any progress until next year on all!
Are conditions this bad across the Severn Bridge where lying, at least, is not taught in school?
These 40 odd questions are hopefully the basis for a ‘Noddy Land’ children’s book best seller
Yours faithfully, Maurice J Kirk BVSc Cc The Secretary of State for Wales HMP Park. You Tube Association of McKenzie Friends Bridgend. mauricejohnkirk.com RCVS GMC, CCRC, HMCPS
I am currently deep in the middle of a South Wales Police criminal conspiracy, an experience lasting almost three decades, that makes the words set out below simply a fanciful fairy tale but alas, it is at the heart of a far more serious case in England, right now!
Asusual for those who attend this week I buy the substantive ‘lunch’!
Friday’s T20200177 hearing re failed HM Prosecution Service Disclosure
Maurice Kirk<maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>
14:44 (1 minute ago)
to South, Enquiries, Celia, butlincat, Alun, bcc: me
1. I am even being refused electronic copies of the evidence in the case from lawyers in order I may instruct a solicitor and barrister so there is little chance of my getting it off you, is there?
2. I, of course, refer also to the prosecution’s deliberate withholding of its alleged ‘ ‘unused ‘ material you relied upon in the other charges now dropped but were maliciously used, at the time, to have me locked up in Cardiff, HMP Parc and Exeter gaols for almost a year unconvicted.
3. Remember, you are also reliant on the South Wales Police having also fabricated I had criminal convictions of ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’ to make sure all prison staff know
4. But you will not even disclose the evidence in the case to me, in electronic form, as it would not just undermine another lucrative police advantage, you have over your victims, it would also be bad in appearing to ‘level the playing field’ of this far outdated England & Wales judicial system
THE POLICE CONSTABLE’S oath of attestation as follows: “I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality; upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property, and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.
Once bound by this oath, Section 50 of the same act binds officers to regulations set by the Secretary of State. One set of these are the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2008, which contain a schedule of behaviours to which officers must adhere to. These behaviours include:
Honesty and Integrity: Police Officers are honest, act with integrity and do not compromise or abuse their position.
Orders and Instructions: Police officers only give and carry out lawful orders and instructions. Discreditable Conduct: Police officers behave in a manner which does not discredit the police service or undermine public confidence in it, whether on or off duty.
Challenging and Reporting Improper Conduct: Police officers report, challenge or take action against the conduct of colleagues which has fallen below the standards of professional behaviour. Ministers are bound, as another type of public office holder, in much the same way, by the Ministerial Code 2010.
Under Common Law, if a public officer wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification neglects to perform any duty they are bound to perform, by Common Law or Statute, then they are guilty of the offence of misconduct in a public office.
The elements of this offence are that:
a) public officer was acting as such b) wilfully neglected to perform their duty and/or c) wilfully misconducted themselves in a way which amounted to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder d) without reasonable excuse or justification
The misconduct is not restricted to dishonesty, bribery or corruption but must injure the public interest and call for condemnation and punishment. For example in the case of R v Dynham [1979] a police officer watched a man being beaten but did not intervene; the officer was convicted.
A further Common Law offence is called Perverting the Course of Justice and is committed where a person embarks on a course of conduct, which has a tendency to, and was intended to, pervert the course of public justice. The ways in which this can be committed include; concealing offences, assisting others to evade arrest and failing to prosecute.
The Police Act 1996 once again makes a further provision of note, in Section 89(2). It states that any person who resists or wilfully obstructs a constable in the execution of his duty, or a person assisting a constable in the execution of his duty, shall be guilty of an offence. And another in Section 30, which defines the jurisdiction of a Constable as: “throughout England and Wales and the adjacent United Kingdom waters”.
So, in summary: The rules are that I must act; that if I don’t I break the law.
VIDEO: Britain First EXPOSES migrant hotel in Leeds! PS: If you enjoyed this video and want to see more street activism videos, consider giving a small one-time donation to help power and fuel our activities, demonstrations and recruitment drives. We cannot do this alone, we need our supporters to provide the resources so we can get out on the streets and take our country back! Our brave activists are depending on you: www.patriot-campaigns.uk
The Trial judge will sit on a case management hearing on 9th April 21 and has allocated only one hour when it requires at least half a day, if not a whole one with police in attendance concerning the SWP perverting the course of justice.
My outstanding applications include disclosure requests o
my four prisoner letter logs retained in Exeter, Cardiff and Parc and Swansea prisons copies of which were supplied to HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) and some to CPS (England) to cause the recent dropped charges.
my MG6D SWP unlawfully withheld data for 28 years, CPS & police data as evidence, if disclosed under CPR, would have ‘undermined’ almost all their criminal allegations 89% of which were quashed when standing at 113 in all
my FTAC logs confirm I am ‘no risk’ to stop my cross examination of Asher.
my MAPPA logs that record that I am of ‘good character’ hence requiring the police doctor giving evidence in support and also requires a witness summons
my OASYsis logs the SWP had deliberately falsified to cause years of delay in my release before HM Parole Board when parole office identified ‘no risk’.
my confiscated South Wales Police defence data as the Claimant in ten plus civil claims, alone, would quash criminal proceedings.
The return of my Volvo car containing vital evidence for current proceedings
I yet again apply for G4S to return my 1st Nov 2019 property brutally robbed from me during my violent exit from HMP Parc. My personalty included my new wheelchair, my comprehensive medical records from Caswell Clinic and NHS (Wales) secure psychiatric hospital delivered to the prison by Dr Gaynor Jones, my legal papers including my MP letter log, cases BS614159 (40 plus failed SWP malicious criminal prosecutions, currently at the RCJ and Cardiff barrister’s chambers, 1CF03361 (SWP ‘trading in machine guns’ failed malicious criminal prosecution) currently before a quasi-Cardiff county court.
And witness summonses to attend with relevant records, if not disclosed before, are Cardiff & Parc HM Governors, Alun Cairns MP & B Hughes, probation officer, to confirm my SWP faked convictions, included ‘firearms’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘child abuse’. A liaison officer was seen stealing, twice, my legal papers from my cell is required.
AND to again argue re ‘bad character’, banning me from cross examining prosecution witnesses again resulted from Dr TW’s testimony written, is a joke, when it was he that was mentally ill. He said I suffer from irreversible ‘significant brain damage’ and PDD (Paranoid Delusional Disclosure) in my misconceived belief that I am being ‘stalked’ by the South Wales Police,” no, perish the thought”!
My restraining order and ‘bad character’ convictions are now in serious doubt due to
the T20097445 trial prosecution exhibitARH1, labelled for the jury as ‘Lewis machine gun ‘, was far from the truth. My ‘possession’, which had me MAPPA 3/3 registered, as contrary to1968 Firearms Act, was nothing more than an unserviceable 0.410 single shot ‘garden gun’ for rats and tree rats! Inspection by Huxtable (see his 4th Jan 2010 witness statement, deliberately withheld from both me and the jury) recorded the non-rifled barrel was condemned and too wide a bore to fire either a 0.303 or US 0.300 round.
Andrew Huxtable at SWP HQ, on 23rd June 09, knew this when that nigh the Nottinghamshire police confirmed the exhibit was NOT a ‘gun’ and confirmed when he ‘stripped it down’ and videoed it. Also, my speaking directly to Birmingham Proof House, after my acquittal, it was confirmed there were no ‘machine gun’ parts found inside the ‘Gunbus’ film prop WW1 replica!
I have already instructed and paid, in advance, a London QC and law firm of solicitors, specialising in malicious criminal prosecutions, which is another reason why the South Wales Police lied to CPS (England) over the malicious criminal prosecutions that had me gaoled in Exeter prison last year to further frustrate my right of civil redress in ten or so civil claims.
My May 2019 Alun Cairns MP letter from Cardiff prison, staff told me, was stuffed with a ‘bag of white powder’ believed to be heroin while my white powder contaminated letter, to John Graham, contained possible anthrax.
The SWP forensic psychiatrist, who applied at 2nd Dec 2009 secret Cardiff Crown court in my absence, that I should be locked away for life as ‘very dangerous, due to ‘significant brain damage’ while blaming Professor Rodger Wood’s similarly daft medical reports upon which ‘he relied’, flagrant liar, said my frontal brain damage was from my ‘ditching in the Caribbean in my D-Day 1944 Piper cub and for having been a too long a term drinking partner of my veterinary client and actor, Oliver Reed Esq.
If there is still doubt in the trial judge’s mind that I am not ‘fit’ to cross examine the culprit in this nonsense then I invite His Honour to cause disclosure as to why ‘vulnerable’? My £20,000 plus paid for court transcripts confirm I am ‘no risk’ to anyone but the deceitful % found over Offa’s Dyke.
(I offer below witnesses £1000 each to come forward)
My telephone number is 07708586202 & Email maurice@kirkflyingvet.com if you can assist. please, in establishing why I am blocked from communicating with anyone in the Conservative Party’s administration?
Only disclosed by welsh authorities this year as it proves misfeasance
When I was a member of the Welsh Conservative Party, while working as a veterinary surgeon in the Vale of Glamorgan, Alun Cairns MP’s predecessors, such as John Smith MP and Walter Sweeney MP, spent much time with me and both had invited me for tea in the House, overlooking the river Thames. The subjects talked about always included the same old matter of South Wales Police bullying following their latest malicious criminal convictions failure.
Walter Sweeney Esq
In the early 2000s I did a ‘scalp’ count:
Of the last 113 criminal allegations levelled at me I had won 89% of them and that was without either a lawyer and little, if any, independent defence witnesses not frightened by their local South Wales Police’s notorious reputation not having to answer to anyone for its persistent lying and other nefarious conduct.
Seven times, for example, I was stopped on the roads around Barry to produce my driving documents and seven times I had refused as, identifying the name of my insurance company invariably led to a visit to the brokers’ offices by the ‘men in blue’ only for the boss to ring and suggest I move my cover to another company.
This was the same tactic in Guernsey, of course, after the Taunton police, following my acquittal of ‘theft’, again requiring no defence, having ‘put the boot in’ over their ‘missing’ Chief Superintendent’s personal pocket note book borrowed from his office in order to gain my decisive ‘acquittal over their latest bizarre tantrum
I was accused of a firearms offence with an old worn out 18 century flintlock that caused ‘the biggest man hunt’ Taunton had ever known, the court heard. Anything to stop me from practicing veterinary surgery.
Exeter Crown Court
28th March 2021
Dear Sir/Madam,
DRAFT
Mr Robin Shellard of Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, tomorrow, will be asked to prove I ever knew or should have known about the Cardiff magistrates court 1st December 2011 ‘restraining order’ before it was allegedly ‘breached.
The R/Owas mischievously designed to cover-up Caswell Clinic’s psychiatrist having been blackmailed by South Wales Police to fabricate his 19th Oct 2009 quite unqualified medical report of me that I suffer PDD (paranoid delusional disorder), in the belief I am being persecuted by the South Wales Police and that I have ‘significant’ and irreversible brain damages and so registered MAPPA 3/3 and should be locked away for life, without a trial, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.
Mr Robin Shellard tomorrow, will be asked to produce documentary proof as to when, where and by whom, with five witnesses present, did I get served this purported 1st December 2011restraining order?
Mr Shellard , tomorrow, will be asked to produce a statement that prison officer Lea-Barker was present when he or another tried to stuff my discharge custody papers down my left sock as I I was being dragged the length of the floor out of the Cardiff magistrates custody suite, without my crutches, after 5pm.
Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will also be asked to show proof I ever knew or should have known about someone from a later Cardiff courthaving ‘handed me’ a ‘variation’ to that original ‘restraining order and when, where and by whom was it to finally supply me with a certified true copy also for HM Recorder of Exeter?
Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will also be asked to confirm, again by documentation, that I had then been immediately ‘gate arrested’, on 1st December 2011 by the South Wales Police, within the court building but no ‘restraining order’ was then given to me or found about my person.
Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will also be asked to confirm, in the custody records, following my then overnight Tottenham police station stay before release from Haringey Corner magistrates with a £50 fine I still refuse to pay, that there is no record of any ‘restraining order’ relating to the rogue sacked ‘deported ‘ to New Zealand Caswell Clinic police psychiatrist ever found by the Met police either.
Mr Robin Shellard, tomorrow, will be also asked to confirm his colleague, barrister Chris Smythe, had even taken the trouble, with my barrister, David Leathley Esq, to try and examine the court records from both Cardiff Crown Magistrate’s court files but were both refused access. It stinks does it not?
Both were lawyers refused as I had already been into the court building in disguise and ‘got away’ with photocopies of court record displaying they had been ‘tampered with’ (deliberately falsified) once I had arrested the original HM Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans, who is another eye witness to the truth.
The CPS barrister therefore was forced to give evidence in Bristol Crown Court that he was also a witness that I could never have been ‘served’ the 1st December 2011 restraining order before I had, unknowingly, breached the purported district magistrate John Charles hand written order created, incidentally, between CPS and him in my absence!
Restraining orders are still unlawfully in place, 10 years later, in order to prevent my obtaining relevant disclosure and applying for my 19th October 2009 seriously damaging Dr TW unqualified psychiatric report being corrected or getting the original prosecutor to repeat his Bristol Crown Court evidence, years ago, before His Honour Judge Johnson tomorrow as it would wipe out 5 years of my false imprisonments.
EXTRACT from 8th Feb 2010 concocted Machine Gun jury trial
Summing -up by Judge Paul Thomas
“Andrew Huxtable of the national ballistic services, again attached to the South Wales Police at Bridgend, he, for five and a half years was with the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers before his present role. He researched the weapon on the internet. He said that the weapon appeared to be built or made around 1911, was from a light machine gun, that’s to say a Lewis gun is a light machine gun, American design, gas operated, and the gases operate the piston to drive to the rear, against the spring. He gave other technical details of the mechanism, which, I confess, I didn’t follow, but perhaps have little significance to this. Again a matter for you. I can remind you of them, if you wish me to, in due course. He says that a .303 calibre ammunition would be fed into
Page 89 of 94
a gun, the gun by a feed arm from the magazine, and he says that when he looked at this Exhibit 1, there were components missing which would have allowed the gun to fire automatically”.
TRANSCRIPT OF 8th FEB 10 TO WITNESS THE LYING I ROUTINELY WITNESS IN WELSH COURTS
Flagrant Liar, Judge Paul Thomas, should have stopped trial after Huxtable was also caught lying on oath
FAO
Exeter Crown Court 28th March 2021 hearing before HM Recorder of Exeter
Devon,
England
26th March 2021
Maurice Kirk’s Complaint re Dr TW for Deliberately Falsifying His Victim’s MAPPA Level 3 Records to Inflict Maximum Harm
I now wish to explore the possibility of criminal prosecutions against the perpetrators, indeed, a criminal investigation into his repeated decisions.
Suggestions and recommendations to include:
1.Call for a criminal forensic investigation into Dr T Ws’ conduct.
2.Cease and desist the use of the failed 2003 Maurice Kirk Vexatious Court Precedent until further notice.
3.Instruct the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice that without any clear Legal Definition of both VEXATIOUS and HARASSMENT that there be no more Vexatious and Harassment appeals/cases should navigate UK Court and Tribunals.
4.Call for an outside police investigation into the conduct of the South Wales Police
5.Immediately instruct the ICO to remove their VEXATIOUS guidelines from their website
I would argue that Dr T Ws’ decision caused numerous MALICIOUS PROSECUTIONS and he has labelled me as MAPPA level 3 Category 3 most dangerous which at best, is a stigma upon my reputation and at worst libellous that leads to incessant harassment by other police forces with loss of my liberty.
I consider that the emphasis should be on an objective standard and that the starting point is that alleged harassment primarily involves making a request which has reasonable foundation, that is, reasonable foundation for thinking that the information
sought to be simply corrected by a single Exeter Crown Court judge would be of value to me and be in the interest of the general public to the public or any section of the public
How many other people’s lives has this psychiatrist ruined by not correcting his reports?
Dr T W facilitating MAPPA, as from 8 June 2009 before he was Cardiff court ordered to provide a Psychiatric Report implies or is consistent with that early on Dr TW was a major player in the “maliciously orchestrated deceit” to stop my BS 614159 +2 (40 odd failed South Wales Police malicious criminal prosecutions) civil claims for damages.
HM Clerk of the Court
Exeter’s 29th March 2021 HM Crown Court case no T20200177
25th January 2021
Dear Sir/Madam,
Yet another South Wales Police Malicious Criminal Prosecution
South Wales Police’s conspiracies include a failed ‘trading in machine guns’ malicious criminal prosecution, a failed MAPPA 3/3 registration from failed Caswell Clinic fabricated forensic evidence that I have ‘irreversible significant brain damage’ and forty odd other failed malicious criminal prosecutions many emanating from the now sacked police blackmailed forensic psychiatrist, T W , who applied and failed, at a secret Cardiff Crown Court, that I should be incarcerated, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.
All concocted in order to frustrate my 1CF003361 and BS614159 plus 10 civil damages claims.
The 44th welsh conspiracy is destined, it appears, most likely to terminate with HM Crown Prosecution Service in believing the South Wales Police would release my stolen property from G4S. at HMP Parc and disclose my prison letter logs from HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc that would reveal a tissue of lies surrounding this current remaining indictment.
Only this year the South Wales Police inadvertently disclosed to me the highly contentious 4th January 2010 police HQ’s Andrew Huxtable witness statement which is why it was deliberately withheld from both me and the jury, during the 28th January 2010 comical Cardiff Crown Court hearing, as its facts reveal, alongside his being cross examined, his flagrant perjury that the investigating senior police officers, such witness yet to be heard, Detective Inspect o Rebecca Hughes, sitting in the back of the court, would you believe!
HUXTABLE IGNORES HOME OFFICE REGULATION TO VIDEO ‘STRIPPING DOWN’ THE ‘GUN’
The 4th Jann 2010 Huxtable hidden MG 11 witness statement disclosed the police exhibit ARH1 was NOT a WW1 Lewis machine gun in my ‘possession’ at all as he had written in his 23rd June 2009 witness statement but a condemned 0.410 shot gun barrel screwed to a piece of old wood, as film prop, to look like a gun in WW1 depicting the 1916 Battle of the Somme!
Of course, HUXTABLE’S curiosity, for nearly two hours, ‘stripped down’ the ‘gun’ to find the case was devoid of machine gun parts to go on to ‘pervert the course of justice’
Yesterday I traced yet another eye witness who was in my1st December 2011 Cardiff magistrates court room to confirm no restraining order was ‘handed down’ by District Judge John Charles to me as I was in the cells. The only document the district judge had was his part hand written one, using blue ink, as draft to ‘beef -up’ prosecution barrister David Gareth Evans’s typed draft for my possible agreement
No documents were given to me, that day, while I was in the cell and the four guards in the doorway of the cell will confirm. Mr Lee-Barker , featured in the photo below, will confirm as it was he that unlocked my cell door.
£1000 REWARD to those witnessing my being given any paperwork at all that day
EXTRACT from Police psychiatrist 19th Oct 2009 Medical Report (para32-40)
OPINION
Clinical.
32. Maurice Kirk’s history is highly complex, convoluted and difficult to understand. The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties (poor writing and spelling). He developed a personality characterised by narcissism (an abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to him) and paranoia (believing he is the victim of persecution). He also shows evidence of poor judgement, impulsivity and a willingness to hold himself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment. Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed Maurice Kirk’s life and probably had a negative affect on his social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout his life. However, Maurice Kirk and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years both his functioning has deteriorated and that his beliefs have become more intense and overwhelming and at sometimes, though not others, are clearly ” abnormal. Maurice Kirk now shows clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes. The specific area of brain damage affects his ability to monitor and control his behaviour, decreases self-awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded his paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, his beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of a paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature).
33. With regard to treatment, neither Maurice Kirk’s underlying personality nor brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of his clearly abnormal beliefs (as opposed to his general paranoid view of the world) it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, though it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication has been offered to Maurice Kirk which he has refused.
34. Clinically it is unclear whether Maurice Kirk’s brain damage is likely to progress. Should it do so his difficulties will become more marked and he will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.
35. With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is also impossible to consider Maurice Kirk’s risk in isolation from those who he encourages to act on his behalf. The risk of Maurice Kirk continuing with his action against South Wales Police and acting in a way that he feels justified to achieve his ends is high, though whether Maurice Kirk himself would be involved in inter-personal violence is less, is cannot be discounted nor can the risk that others would act violently with his encouragement. If Maurice Kirk’s condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase over time
Legal
36.1have been asked to give my mind to the issue as to whether or not Maurice Kirk is fit to plead and stand trial. Maurice Kirk clearly understands the nature of the charge and the significance of his plea. However, due to Maurice Kirk’s mental disorder described above, specifically his brain damage and its relationship to self-awareness, judgement, decision making, self-regulation of behaviour and control of emotions, combined with difficulty organising and sequencing information, his inability to filter out relevant information and his ‘ problems with attention and concentration, his overwhelming perception of himself as being a victim of persecution by the system, all of which are clearly evident in discussions with him concerning the alleged offence, he appears unable to address a specific legal and technical area of law necessary to appropriately conduct his defence.
37. Should Maurice Kirk be legally represented in court I would consider him fit to stand trial as a legal representation would be able to focus on the relevant matters.
38. Maurice Kirk’s current clinical presentation is clearly causing major problems for the Criminal Justice System, though is not of a nature and degree to warrant compulsory treatment. He would, however, benefit from continued contact with Mental Health Services to both monitor his condition and attempt to establish a relationship which would allow other treatment avenues to be explored.
39.1 I am aware that my opinion will cause significant difficulty for the court. I am also aware of the difficulties the court has had gaining further psychiatric evidence which to a degree is due to Maurice Kirk’s perceived ability to intimidate and threaten those who become involved in his case. Should Maurice Kirk require in-patient hospital treatment, I have concerns that a Medium Secure Unit would not be able to provide the degree of procedural security necessary to maintain the safety of its staff the confidentiality of other patients and the necessary security. Should the court wish a second opinion, they may wish to consider instructing a psychiatrist from a High Secure Hospital to assess Maurice Kirk both as to treatment and the environment in which that treatment should take place. I stress that the requirement for conditions of Special Security are purely as a result of Maurice Kirk’s communication with and encouragement of others, rather than his clinical presentation.
40. Maurice Kirk can return to court for any disposal that the court sees fit
This forensic psychiatrist was blackmailed by the South Wales Police to write a string of unqualified medical reports as the police’s T20097445 (my trading in machine guns) imminent jury trial was doomed fore failure.
NEW EVIDENCE IN EXETER CROWN COURTMAY QUOSH 5 YEARS of GOAL
Barrister Robin Shellard of Queen’s Square Chambers, Bristol, has been asked to attend, at my expense. Exeter Crown Court this week, to serve still further documentary proof on His Honour Judge Johnson that one his CPS colleagues, barrister, Chis Smyth who, with my barrister, David Leathley, were both denied the ‘court file‘ with both being told that the pertinent pages re ‘service’ or not, of not just one but two purported restraining orders, in my absence, ‘could not be found’!
As I was familiar with the day to day nefarious conduct, within Cardiff courts, I took the precaution of arresting HM Crown Prosecutor, barrister David Gareth Evans, in order for him, on oath in Bristol Crown court years later, to admit neither his draft of the 1st Dec 2011 restraining nor any variation of the order could have been ‘served’ on me or taken taken to me in the cells or on my release as the four guards and HM Clerk of the court, the latter hiding, terrified, in the adjacent cell will confirm
SO, HOW DO THESE ABOVE PRETEND THAT BELOW IS WRONG?
FAO T20170239
Mr R Killick
HM Crown Prosecution Service Cardiff Wales
7th October 2017
Dear Sir,
A Proposed Draft Restraining Order re My Fabricated MAPPA Records
My telephone call was again to seek disclosure for Criminal Court of Appeal, ECHR and Civil Appeals Registry, as to which, when, why and where purported restraining orders were ever served on me in the first place relating to unlawfully obtained fabricated MAPPA records?
I recall no ‘restraining order’, relating to my police forensic history, having ever been served on me until an alleged breach of one has led to my eventually being arrested.
Only one draft, in all purported ‘variations’ of the original restraining order, may have been attempted to be served on me if the evidence, on oath, of the original CPS barrister in Bristol Crown Court is to be believed. That draft is again requested for the 17th Nov 2017 hearing.
The Court of Appeal dismissed my appeal re 1st Dec 2011 ‘breach’ as both Their Lordships, Leverson LJ and Mitting J, were seriously misled into believing (see transcript) that a jury had not written the enclosed jury-note specifically asking for CCTV, Geoamey, police and magistrate’s clerk notes of ‘service’ of a purported ‘draft’ or otherwise.
The ‘purported ‘service’ was inside my cell surrounded by no less than 4 guards protecting Lee Barker, he said, as I was branded a rare level 3 category 3 MAPPA and very violent prisoner! No one, to this day, has told me when and why I was registered and now, why not? Until a court considers the interests of the general public, by ordering my false MAPPA forensic history, to be disclosed and appropriately corrected by an outside police force called in to investigate, then there will be a 5th jury to convene to ask the obvious questions again
This court withheld evidence was also denied me at my civil claim ‘strike-out’ hearing, done and dusted in mere nanoseconds, polluting both my HM Ministry of Justice and Parole Board in this travesty of justice that could so easily be remedied by a single Crown Court judge.
You refuse to email me the proposed restraining order but I am likely to agree with it, in any event, just as long it will finally put a stop to police forces around the world-wide continuing to apprehend me on any spurious excuses knowing charges will never achieve a conviction.
South Wales Police Profession Standards Complaints Dept
Police HQ
Dear Chief Inspector Steve Grother,
High Level Welsh Police Conspiracy is Starting to Crack at its Foundations
A brief summary, to assist any passing jury, of my many decades of complaints to your South Wales Police so called ‘Professional Standards Dept.’ where it continues to abuse CPR, MG6, OASys, Article 5 and other disclosure procedures.
Was your 17th May 2019 letter also a coincidence to me in Parc prison, quashing a police investigation into my now having proved that, not just your failed 2009 malicious criminal prosecution of my ‘trading in machine guns’ was an act of fraud but that 4th Dec 2018 HM Parole Service’s data disclosed you knew your colleagues had fed the prison and courts false serious criminal convictions, including ‘child abuse’, narcotics & firearms dangerous in order I be MAPPA level 3 cat 3 registered?
Was it simply a coincidence, on 17th May 2019, I was accused of sending the HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP, a bag of alleged heroin from my cell on F wing in Cardiff prison? I had also written to RCJ’s Court of Appeal but all these letters were being stopped without my being informed, were they not?
Is it still a coincidence that my letters, both in and out of prison re MPs offering assistance, were neither forwarded to the respective MPs nor returned to me? It is now accepted, by Taunton police, releasing my letter to John Graham Esq where I was asking him to find me a lawyer, was maliciously stopped by your police despite knowing it contained no anthrax at all?
A coincidence or just another police conspiracy to frustrate my 10-year running 1CF03361 machine gun damages claim?
Is it still a coincidence, Chief Inspector, that the South Wales Police telephoned MPs to say that as I had tried to post, what the English authorities described as ‘harmless’ ‘unidentified’ white powder, stinking of prison issue toothpaste and used as glue to stick down recycled envelopes, was contrary to 2001 Prevention of Terrorism Act and therefore I was not to be released from prison other than, possibly, to Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital, indefinitely?
Is it still a coincidence that my ignored complaint to you, re Caswell Clinic’s rogue doctor’s 19th October 2009 false medical report, obtained under blackmail in a secret 2nd Dec 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, that I be incarcerated in Ashworth for life?
Are you now prepared to reconsider my previously provided facts of complaint, surrounding the 1st Dec 2011 purported restraining order ‘service’ on me when both HM Crown Prosecutors, David Evans & Chis Smyth state that was impossible?
Are you prepared to reconsider the criminal conduct surrounding my appointed barrister being told by a district judge that the Cardiff court files, on my numerous ‘restraining orders’ re rogue police psychiatrist, were now mysteriously ‘lost’?
Are you prepared to send to a named barrister of my choice your whole file on my apparently futile complaints, over three decades, in order that current criminal allegations in both Taunton and Exeter criminal courts will obviously be quashed?
When it comes to the subject of ‘misfeasance in a public office’ then there is ‘nothing new under the Sun’ where the day-to-day nefarious conduct of too many in the South Wales Police is concerned is there, Inspector Steve Grother?
My 29th March 2021 Exeter Crown Court ‘disclosure’ hearing, at 10am, is far too long overdue as, in all my UK criminal and civil cases, if I obtain appropriate police disclosure of the relevant evidence then I invariably win but will you help me?
If statutory CPR procedures are abused, as has been the habit in the decades with successive Cardiff’s law courts, then I am destined not to be allowed to win, whatever the seriousness of the circumstances may be so will you disclose the evidence?
For many years the English authorities have been fed spiteful and malicious erroneous forensic evidence by some in your South Wales Police and often generated following your police losing their latest absurd criminal allegations, isn’t that so?
These recent criminal allegations lost by the South Wales Police was also based on the fact I had been gaoled for ‘breaching’ a court ‘restraining order’ never ‘served’ on me in the first place but will you obtain Queen Square Chambers proof on this?
Is the level of spite against an Englishman, having won 89% of 113 South Wales Police malicious criminal allegations, resulting in well over forty failed malicious criminal prosecutions being, ignominiously done BUT why will not investigate?
In the collapsed case of PC Murphy caught lying about my ‘smuggling pigs’ into Eire in my aircraft why was prosecutor last seen quickly grabbing a CPS file and running for the exit if not to avoid my habit of arresting proven bent officials in courts?
Why, in the collapsed case of CPS officer, Soffa, when hiding the true identity of the driver was disclosed in court following his arrest, were not the police officers not then investigated by your department for also ‘perverting the course of justice’?
Also in May 2019 why was I gaoled unconvicted for having sent a ‘harmless’ white powder to John Graham and others when Cardiff prison staff knew it was simply the remnants of prison toothpaste used on a WANTED poster stuck on my cell wall?
The subject on the WANTED poster was the lying Caswell Clinic police doctor who still refuses to correct his 19th Oct 2009 medical report when knowing it was false and very, very damaging so why will you not help me recover that data from G4S?
The English authorities will never obtain CPR ‘disclosure’ of relevant evidence from Welsh authorities as it is a reason why I am unable to be legally represented. Without immediate ‘specific disclosure’ for example, relating to my stolen prison correspondence, both in and out of all three welsh prisons and for G4S refusing to return my property, robbed from me on 1st November 2019, it must come under one of your responsibilities and if not, just who is ultimately responsible?
Will you supply disclosure or I may not attend further management hearings as the current case is of your doing is it not?
The incriminating South Wales Police evidence you cause to be released would mean, would it not, my not just winning this latest charade currently in an English court but also a dozen other flawed welsh maliciously brought criminal convictions all fabricated to prevent my reinstatement onto the veterinary register in order needed to finance my civil claims against you?
Will you stop my being re-instated onto the UK veterinary register and enter the USA to recover stolen aircraft despite my suing your welsh authorities for almost losing my life, loss of my wife, my health, my wealth and damned near my sanity?
The welsh prosecution’s motive always was and still is that I be continuously incarcerated in some stinking welsh prison in order to prejudice my now formidable ‘extreme and unusual’ ten or so civil damages claims against the South Wales authorities for their modus operandi of incessant bullying but will you help in obtaining disclosure of evidence to support?
Alternatively, was this bizarre criminal allegation sparked off by the Avon and Somerset Police by way of a simple telephone call from Wales, my having never forgotten my winning over 70% of many fanciful criminal prosecutions, back in the 70s in Taunton when the % win recorded should have been the other way round based on Home Office guide lines?
My 75% success in similarly failed criminal prosecutions, in both Guernsey and Alderney law courts, only needed that same ’put the boot in’ telephone call from the insular minded Bailiwick police, in the early 90s, to your police with their inept hatred and acts of deceit on anything English, so can you confirm that repeat for the forthcoming trial?
Those 113 plus criminal allegations in Wales were levelled at me in the space of about nine years so is your game to repeat such an abuse of process here in civilised England due to plain old fashioned spite for having lost 89% of them?
Is there a risk that the consequences of your unlawfully withheld disclosure of incriminating forensic evidence will be seen as yet another conspiracy to ‘pervert the course of justice’ as in last year’s withheld ‘machine gun’ evidence by Dolmans, solicitors and its private client, the Chief Constable for the South Wales Constabulary, you also flatly refuse to investigate?
Will you now investigate why the new ‘machine gun’ evidence, released ten years but not to me, proved my innocence?
But are you prepared to cause release, for the Exeter trial and HM Royal Court of Justice, the very relevant witness statements gathered by a Llantwit Major Acting Inspector when I was gaoled in Cardiff’s Central Police station and fined £50 for allegedly ‘attempting to kill the Lord Mayor of Cardiff with one of my machine guns’?
Will you help me recover my G4S stolen legal papers, clothes, shoes and wheelchair because, if not recovered by the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, before the scheduled 29th March court hearing. then there will be no point in my attending?
For any new reader of my website I must explain was it last year’s sheer luck or was it the deliberate stopping HHJ Andrew Keiser QC covering up Dolmans ordered to disclose data previously, unknown to me, the eleven and twelve year old forensic reports by both welsh and Nottinghamshire police and Birmingham Proof House on the ‘firing capability’ exhibit ARH1?
The ‘stripping down’ of the alleged section 5(1) of 1968 Firearms Act ‘prohibited weapon’ was videoed as per Home Office Regulations but why were the police then ordered by Chief Constable Barbara Wilding to destroy this CCTV footage or did it relate to her swiftly resigning her post simply to protect her pension?
Should I get your disclosure and yet undisclosed Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital CCTV footage, surrounding the police and CPS’s malicious criminal fabrication that I should be locked away for life, due to ‘significant brain damage’, will heads roll?
Why are police statements, exceeding over a dozen of them, still withheld as all were concocted by the South Wales Poli in order I be registered MAPPA 3/3 to be lawfully ‘shot’ on 22nd June 2009 right in front of my family?
Why do you allow copies of my Caswell clinic leaked medical records, needed for the Exeter trial as supporting my ‘non fitness to plead’ application, are still within the Dr Gaynor Jones sent file to G4S prison on 6th November 2018 at police HQ?
But why did the medical records include quotes from the arrogant and ignorant habitual liar, Professor Rodger Wood, writing my having ‘significant brain damage’ was not just due to my ditching my WW2 aircraft in the Caribbean but for being a long-term drinking partner of my veterinary client, actor Oliver Reed Esq?
Was I therefore deemed medically unfit and therefore unable to ‘stand trial’ for ‘being in possession of a prohibited weapon’ as all knew, by early July 2009, the prosecution case against me was, as the next, most likely already doomed?
Also, again not unlike the imminent Exeter jury trial, I may finally obtain that Caswell Clinic medical disclosure, too late, snatched by G4S and sought by me ever since October 2009, as the State cannot plead insanity both ways, now can it?
The sacked NHS doctor, however, is scheduled to return from New Zealand to give at least three days of defence evidence, on my behalf, in the trial as it was he who ‘struck a deal’ with your then boss, Barbara Wilding, in 2009, was it not, for not being reported to NHS (Wales) or to the General Medical Council for having knowingly falsified medical reports to ruin me?
Do these extreme and unusual levels of quite unchecked South Wales Police criminal conduct require all my civil and criminal cases being transferred well outside Wales and where appropriate, to be heard in higher level courts?
Will disclosure be ordered by Exeter Crown Court especially as to the 2009 forensic inspection of the ‘gun’, stripped down under video surveillance as per Home Office Regulations, only to reveal, in 2021, it undermined the prosecution’s case?
Was it relevant previous English police forces had, misguidedly, deemed the film prop ‘gun’ was not even a shot gun?
Why withhold these exhibits and witness statements from me and the jury within twenty odd deliberately concocted superfluous files of extraneous irrelevant data if not attempting to further pervert the course of justice?
Why were the same police not been investigated from having both unblocked the barrel and had painted the imitation ammunition magazine a different colour of prosecution exhibit, ARH1, just to try and fool the jury?
Why is your police department covering-up your colleagues and Dolmans, solicitors, conspiracy to now make my civil jury trial 1CF03361 damages claim appearing to be ‘document heavy’ to in order to bar independent scrutiny of an English jury?
Why will you not disclose the full South Wales police officer’s 2010 statement, written just days before the 25th Jan 10 ‘gun’ jury trial in Cardiff Crown Court or was just another attempt to bury incriminating evidence not dissimilar to the currently still withheld Nottinghamshire and Dorset police and MG11 forensic data hidden in your own earlier witness statements?
Why the level of nefarious conduct by so many senior police, re exhibit ARH 1, when they already knew on the M5, at the ‘dead of night’, that this dummy film prop 1916 WW1 Lewis machine-gun that was bolted on my DH2 replica 1916 Battle of the Somme biplane in 2000, was flown at the Farnborough air and all orchestrated by lawyers in fraud, was it not?
Why, today, the same fundamental flaws in the CPS psyche here in England, re purported ‘breaches’ of my ‘restraining’ orders when all know the restraining orders to ‘protect’ rogue Caswell Clinic NHS sacked forensic psychiatrist, were deliberately NOT SERVED on their MAPPA level 3 category 3 MAPPA victim?
I say again, this is confirmed by your CPS and Exeter’s HM Prosecutors from Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, was it not?
Why do you still block the relevant disclosure confirmed by HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) and in these current Exeter proceedings where, again, charges were dropped to try and cover-up the scale of lies dreamed up by your mates?
Was I obstructed to defend myself from decades of police bullying and incessant harassment whilst practicing veterinary science in the Vale of Glamorgan, just for the South Wales Police to falsely have my name removed from the veterinary register or was to curtail my income to fund such an awesome ordeal in prosecuting, in a foreign land, such a corrupt ‘authority’ clearly accountable to no one?
This current criminal allegation originated from Taunton back in the 70’s where, while facing the criminal indictment of the ‘theft of the Chief Superintendent’s personal note book’, why was I given eleven police witnesses and sufficient police controlled ‘disclosure’ needed for that speedy acquittal requiring no defence being tendered so will you cause disclosure?
In 2019 your welsh police had fabricated that I had breached a court bail condition, this time by not returning by 7pm to a Cardiff bail hostel from my second doctor’s appointment in Taunton in the space of 24 hours but will you disclose the truth?
Why was I not allowed to catch a Cardiff train for Taunton five minutes earlier, before 8am or it would be a breach of my MAPPA bail terms originally handed down in order to secure my release from HMP Parc on 1st November 2019?
Similarly, in 2015, you refer to my 2015 re call to Swansea prison without disclosing any evidence so not now for Exeter?
While in Bridgend prison why was I so severely bullied and assaulted for fictitious criminal convictions dreamed up by your boyos that I had never existed? Will your department continue to ignore this complaint of mine also needed for Exeter trial?
Why is my sister and I refused promised Parole Board files for Exeter trial stopped by your police when it was your parole officer, in his ‘leaking’ my 2018 police prepared OASys data, revealing further misfeasance by a fabricated criminal record?
Why are all my legal papers and machine gun papers and MP letter log, especially, covering most of these above complaints, were clearly robbed from me on instructions from your own South Wales Police still not returned to me?
Why are so many senior ranked Bridgend based police officers all refusing to recover any of them stolen by G4S, including my other legal papers, wheelchair, shoes and clothes and my Caswell clinic and NHS (Wales) records specifically emailed to HMP Parc for my Taunton GP and Musgrove hospital’s gastro-enterology teams asking desperately to have copy of them?
Why will you not investigate any of these above identified serious criminal allegations so easily proved?
It all stinks, Chief Inspector Steve Gother, does it not?
Yours,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Cc to HM Crown Prosecution Service England) & HM Crown Court Exeter.
Oh Surprise, Surprise, ,Appears Reluctant to Disclose Data like her Counterpart in South Wales
FAO
Chief Superintendent D Richards
Head of south wales Police Professional Standards Department
Police HQ
Bridgend.
Your ref SG/JDL/32/co/00370/19
My ref T20200177
19th March 2021
Dear Sir,
Police Failed Disclosure of Evidence as it would undermine its Prosecution’s Case
Please find enclosed my 18th March 2021 explanatory complaint letter to Chief Inspector Steve Gother on website who, in decades, has never disclosed any evidence under his or your control as it undermines your prosecution’s case.
This yet undisclosed incriminating evidence is needed for the Exeter Crown Court Jury, triggered by your officers confiscating my property and including my letters to MPs when in HMP Parc, ‘over the wall’ complaining of your officer’s incessant 24/7 bullying.
Why are you refusing me relevant disclosure re my main defence witness, Alun Cairns MP?
Why do you not identify when I was supposed to have known about, yet alone served it, where and by whom with what witnesses, the purported 1st Dec 2011 Cardiff magistrates Restraining Order resulting from an unqualified doctor blackmailed by Welsh police?
Why did your Bristol prosecuting barrister, in circa 2017, confirm that he could not locate, safely, the manner in which I was purportedly served a ‘variation’ of the 1st Dec 2011 order? No, of course Mike Smythe could not, all another welsh court fabrication!
Please supply certified true copies of the two ‘restraining orders’ for RCJ and confirm that Cardiff CPS barrister admitted, on oath at Bristol Crown Court , that I could not of been ‘served’ the 1st ‘restraining order’ as it had not even been ‘handed down’ yet!
10th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff
I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions.
Serious Assaults Incident 1900418801
After my Feb 2019 unlawful ‘recall’ to prison from a Cardiff parole hostel I was assaulted on numerous occasions in Parc prison with one incident already reported over the ‘floor buffer’ on A2 wing. All required medical attention and captured on CCTV & body cameras.
The 2nd filmed significant assault was in June 2019 when I was forcibly removed from my 2nd missing wheel chair by unnecessary force from seven officers carrying me back to B block.
The 3rd main incident was in Nov 2019 when I was snatched from my cell by unprovoked excessive force using no less than eight G4S officers using handcuffs on my wrists behind my back. This deliberate pain was inflicted continued from B wing to the main gate where I was ‘released’ for Bristol Royal Infirmary attention. This included x-rays due to my hip prosthesis having suffered partial subluxation of my hip joint and prescription analgesics for a month.
The incidents have left me feeling severely intimidated, vulnerable and in constant pain.
Deliberate False Forensic History Yet Again
In Sept & Dec18 G4S had inadvertently released Caswell Clinic medical data by fabricated police criminal convictions including ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘narcotics’, ABH and ‘FTA’.
Oct 19 HM Parole Board hearing, with evidence from a retired magistrate, had also revealed why a prison had needed such violent ‘constraints’. Both parole officer & prison supervisor had vehemently opposed release as I was, ‘violent and extremely dangerous’. To whom was I a danger, exactly, turned out to be only the Chief Constable? This caused my swift release.
That CCTV and more leaked 2009 Barry police station MAPPA level 3 category 3 data of Barbara Wilding’s conspiracy, to have me shot, is applied for to be disclosed at the ‘machine gun’ hearing on 24th January as it all identifies the original culprit’s nefarious conduct.
‘Heroin’ to Alun Cairns MP & false Allegations
My Feb 19 release was due so police concocted reasons to stop my mail in and out of Cardiff & Parc prisons to protract time in prison and delay my civil claims. The ‘white powder’ found in my two MP letters had simply been remaining traces of toothpaste originally used for gluing exhibits on to my cell wall when originals had been stolen by my key liaison officer.
Further Deliberate Theft of my Possessions
Despite my pleadings and requests by parole staff G4S continues to refuse to return my wheel chair and legal papers as the latter is needed, of course, for my 10am 24th January 2020 civil court proceedings against both G4S and the South Wales Police. Today’s MG11 VPS written complaint to very patient South Wales police officers will, no doubt, end up in the police HQ shredder as did the ones, re police paint gun, to try and fool the 2010 jury!
Protection from Harassment Act? Should it be re-drafted? No. This is not a case of a Statute which was ‘badly drafted’ : I
t was very carefully drafted (not for its supposed purpose), but as a weapon for Stasi Police to persecute law-abiding people- & has been used by them with enthusiasm! It should be wiped from the Statute Bok complete!
Norman Scarth
From: Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com> Sent: 01 February 2021 11:18 Subject: ‘Stalking’ a Member of Parliament I would be grateful for your view on the 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act as a ‘bad law’ or not?
Your view on its statutory defence, ‘to detect and prevent crime’. Is it sufficient?
You will recall I was goaled in May 2019 for sending you and John Graham a ‘white powder, described by Cardiff prison officers as possible anthrax spores or heroin.
I never established what the South Wales Police analysis was nor whether you received the letters at the House of Commons or informed the police had stopped them?
Yesterday, in Bridgwater police station, I was allowed to examine one of my letters stopped from leaving both Cardiff and G4S badly run HMP Parc, Bridgend , Others included court letters addressed to HM Royal Courts of Justice, lawyers and family.
You will recall on 1st Nov 2019 I was robbed of my legal and papers by bullying G4S staff (eight of them) causing the need for my Bristol Royal Infirmary emergency visit.
Whereas I obtained the indictment under 2001 Terrorism Act, for sending a ‘white powder’ at the same time to John Graham Esq, who has already written to you on the grave matter, neither he nor I have received your replies. did you reply?
I was told at the police station neither I nor John Graham were interviewed on the matter of ‘white powder’ sent to you from my prison cell and yet it was all the prison gossip, resulting in the need for calling in the drug dogs and a 32 minute cell search while I was locked up in the shower unit, on F wing, in my wheelchair.
Where as no drugs or Lewis machine guns were found were you, Mr Cairns, contacted by the South Wales Police, at all and did you receive all my letters from both HMP Parc & HMP Cardiff?
As I was in prison for about five months, having gone no where near a court room over the incident, I never did stablish its outcome and identification of the ‘strongly smelling of peppermint white as the indictment was finally dropped.
EXTRACT of email to COPS (Wales)
A Simplification of my meeting at Bridgwater police station
I need to familiarise myself on dates, times and place while at the police station
eg, in advance for me to collect at 3pm today.
1, When and where was I charged for alleged offenses?
REPLY
“You were not charged or interviewed under caution relating to Alun Cairns MP and John Graham”
2. Was I given copies of all witness statements taken by police and prison staff?
REPLY
“You will have to obtain that information from the CPS (Wales?)”
3. ‘white powder’ — I am yet to be given a conclusion of its identity, possible source and laboratory data supporting that conclusion?
REPLY
“You will have to obtain that information from the CPS”
4. Is it that the South Wales Police deny I wrote to Alun Cairns MP in 2019/2020 or simply refusing to supply copies of them?
REPLY
“You will have to obtain that information from the CPS”
to be continued
Yours faithfully,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Norman in Eire
of 2 NS File ref: Protection From Harassment Act
The Protection from Harassment Act, 1997.
The Quislings who now rule Britain are fiendishly clever at thinking up new laws which, on the face of it, appear to be for good purpose, but are actually designed as a weapon to persecute law-abiding people. Such a one is the ’1997 Protection from Harassment Act’. To go back a few years: Over several decades, women who had begged the police for protection from stalkers (mostly ex-husbands or ex-lovers) were told, ”He hasn’t broken the law. Until he does, there is nothing we can do”. A significant number of these terrified women were in fact murdered by the very men from whom they begged for protection. Politicians did nothing but wring their hands & repeat what the police said. Eventually, responding to calls that ’Something must be done’ , much belatedly, they did introduce the’1997 Protection from Harassment Act’. Tragically, it did nothing whatsoever to reduce such murders (which continued as before!) (LATE NOTE: The Guardian of 26/2/2014 carried stories of several women murdered recently http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/26/cassandra-hasanovic-murder-domestic- violence “In another case, Christine Chambers and her daughter, Shania, were murdered in June 2011 by David Oakes. In August 2012 an IPCC report found that Essex police had failed to recognise any pattern or connection between events and identified a failure to share information between agencies. Between June and September this year there have been four more domestic homicides in Essex. The force has confirmed that at least three of the victims had contact with it before their deaths.”)
The REASON it failed is because it was not designed to do what it purported to do! It was only ever intended as a weapon to persecute law-abiding people - & is used with enthusiasm by police thugs! The incongruity of this very badly mis-used law is beyond anything George Orwell imagined.
Consider: It is NOT a crime to walk down a street, nor to offer leaflets in a public place. However, if you walk down a street twice, or offer leaflets on TWO occasions - as I did - this lawful activity becomes a most terrible crime, resulting in a massively expensive (& most devious) operation - involving at least 15 police officers - to arrest the ‘dangerous criminal’ in his Sheltered Housing home (sheltered??) & drag him off in handcuffs to Bradford Lubyanka! Run for your lives – he’s got a LEAFLET! What did my leaflets say? I was inviting His ‘Honour’ Judge Jonathan Lee Rose to resign.
Page 2 of 2 NS File ref: Protection From Harassment Act There were three hearings in Leeds Magistrates’ Court, then it was transferred over the Pennines to Manchester, where there were three more hearings (think of the expense – on top of the police expenditure in money & manpower!) By the time of the first hearing in Manchester City Magistrates’ Court, I had, belatedly, accepted that Britain is not a safe place for anyone who tells the truth, & fled the land of my birth for safety in Ireland. I did send a message to the court that they should go ahead in my absence, which they could have done, especially as the ‘offence’ had been reduced to ne which was ‘not imprisonable’. District Judge Jonathan Taaffe (who is NOT a magistrate!) declined to do so. Instead, he adjourned & issued a warrant for my arrest – WITHOUT BAIL! He also issued a ‘Restraining Order’, that if I dare to mention Judge Rose’s name – in any way at all – I am liable to FIVE YEARS in prison for ‘Contempt of Court’. THAT is the fate that awaits me if I dare set foot in Britain again! There – by publishing his name now, I am in trouble again! Well, I have declared my contempt for those who run the British Courts, & have done so loudly & clearly on many occasions. Sending me to prison (or to a Nuthouse – which is the real intention) will certainly not lessen my contempt for them. At the third Manchester hearing in June 2012, Taaffe did declare me guilty, with fine & costs totalling £650, which was taken in weekly instalments from my Old Age Pension. Fortunately, while the several monthly performances of the pantomime were going on in Man City Mags, I was in the Republic of Ireland safe from the malice of Rose, Taaffe & their cronies. What a tragedy – NOT for me, but for Britain! Norman Scarth. ‘There are no bad laws, for if it is bad, it is not law’. (Sir William Blackstone, 1723 – 1780) in The Commentaries on the Laws of England)
Have you experienced a police helicopter hovering over your home while 20 odd police surround you, many armed, in order to shoot the father dead and plan be , they if fail, snatch your 10 year old daughter with social services in attendance.
PLEASE think about it
IT WILL TAKE ME 18 MONTHS TO GET CD OF MY POLICE INTERVIEW TAPE RE SENDING ‘HEROIN’ TO HM SECRETARY OF STATE FOR WALES FROM MY CARDIFF PRISON CELL, SUCH IS THEIR LEVEL OF NEFARIOUS CONDUCT
Why? The interview was conducted in an unlawful manner
Sabine took the brunt of the deceit in our thoroughly corrupt courts and found herself gaoled for many years for simply speaking the truth
FAR MORE IMPORTANT is the current state of our UK law courts that Sabine exposed
Christmas message from Sabine
A ‘bomb of hope’ had reached me when I got emails from Neelu with her campaigning efforts. On Christmas Eve Wikipedia’s entry on ‘octagons’ was delivered with a beautiful card and a colouring book from another most loyal friend and supporter. Am I lucky to know them!!!
Thus I had my ‘parallel octagons’ for breakfast today when an officer brought me gifts and cards from three sources.
Maybe most significantly “Fabula” A framework for fiction writers. For I continue to seek desperately the right angle and story for my insights, discoveries and innovations. Fed up with words, I stopped writing my diary about myself rather than as self. I am also fed up with RECORDING my events and experiences. Too much more of the same.
My new wall of support covers the last toothpaste stain, as Christmas Cards shine with their beauty over the ugly grey beige of the wall.
One gift came from Martin Houston who broadcasts on “We Think Freely” Radio. (WTF) dlive.tv/WTFR – 9pm to 11pm Tuesdays & Fridays. It’s “The Covid Con; A Ware” by Courtesy Adam Lawrence, An empty table of contents but a powerful symbol $ The money con in a nutshell.
The hand crafted gifts another friend sent were retained once again. After all I am treated like the average prisoner ready to self harm in a most ingenious fashion. Once again address of sender removed!
A set of exquisite cards would help every-body in any lockdown, lockin or lockup. Little Joys: images on one side and a short caption on the other – to remind us of all the little pleasures we can feel, if and when we are attentive.
During my daily (wearily) ration of fresh air, Father Christmas came in the shape of a Nurse, delivering magnesium that was due a week ago. End of anxiety!!! Yesterday I received 90 complimentary tablets of sunshine vitamin D3. `One of the best kept secrets in this place – like the Prison Advisory Service – an excellent Charity who sent a letter on the 7th /12 which also arrived this morning. Not enough postage caused the delay.
Creativity abounds inside to outside. Which crack will let the light come in? Who will be inspired to do what afresh, anew? IF ONLY I COULD THANK EVERYONE WHO’S BEEN KIND AND GENEROUS TO ME! When packaging is removed with senders addresses, I am left hanging and senders will be worrying…. did it ever get there. It has even happened with emails!
But my bottom line is unshakable faith and an amazing capacity of mind and body to OVERCOME whatever obstacles are before us. I even walk again! Every day a little bit faster! Into 2021 full of POSITIVE surprizes, I hope! – Christmas Greetings from Sabine
A lawyer’s lucrative syndrome put both Mrs Sabine MacNeill and myself into long prison terms purely due to succession of spineless UK judges not being fit for purpose instead of putting a stop, once and for all, to the disgusting practice of lawyer fraud
1st Dec 2011 Cardiff arrest by South Wales Police refusing my attending London court so Harringay Council fraud can snatch six Musa Nigerian children for profit and the very same day the Welsh authorities also fabricated I was served a restraining order!
Our current HM Justice Minister, Mr Buckland, ,implicated in shire Hall proceedingsBlackmailed now sacked medical professional for lying about me just once too often
His mate, HM Crown Prosecutor, Mr Robin Shellard, of Queen Square Chambers, Bristol, keeps promising me, before His Honour Judge Peter Johnson, my John Graham Esq letters back, confiscated by HMP Parc and HMP Cardiff in 2019 but it is now over 19 months and still nothing! –
Despite my visiting four times now, on CPS insistence, not even a usable Taunton police station CD of my 1st August 2019 South Wales Police interview, under caution, can I obtain as the welsh police refuse to produce it.
The CD content, of course, reveals the level of deceit the welsh authorities are prepared to stoop meaning it is now destined for immediate world-wide publicity on 4/5 websites to reveal as to ‘what really goes on in our UK justice system’ boasting superiority.
unlawfully stopped welsh prison letters I know about
— Chaos or just the usual South Wales Police giving my English judiciary the usual ‘run-around’ due to plain spite? My letters to MPs caused extensive prison and police investigation but not one piece of data, yet, have the welsh police disclosed to HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) relating to my believed to be anthrax spores to Alun Cairns MP from my Cardiff prison cell, Conor Burns MP, Selaine Saxby MP when simply asking for help.
In the Taunton Shire Hall G00TA220 / T20200177
Maurice John Kirk
Claimant
v
G4S Care and Custodial Services Ltd
Defendant
Application for disclosure due to HM Prosecution Service’s refusal to disclose relevant evidence and for the court to Order the return of his possessions including medical records legal papers and correspondence withheld by G4S and HMP Cardiff since Defendant/Claimant was a prisoner there in 2019/20
Grounds for applications
On the 24 January 2020 HHJ Keyser asked that the Claimant re-serve this Application on the Court and Defendant(s) where the Claimant understands all Defendant(s) are represented by Counsel Mr Christian Howells of 30 Park Place. The Clerk at 30 Park Place tells the Claimant to serve on Dolmans, solicitors, Cardiff.
There could be two ways of approaching the background. A simple version is G4S have the possession and legal papers belonging to the Claimant and should hand them back. While G4S do not respond and remain the thief. Therefore, unless possessions and papers are returned a Judicial Review to Order their return would seem appropriate with arrest of the HM Governor of HMP Parc
The more complex is that G4S make decisions as a part of a multi agency approach and these multi agency parties act with malice with Police and Dr Roger Thomas of Caswell Clinic trying to harm the Claimant to thwart both his criminal defences and civil claims that may well help expose their, and their colleague’s wrongdoing. The Defendant/Claimant tries to help the Court by being brief and avoiding the more complex detail at this stage.
The Simple Background and Facts
In 2018/19 possessions, including legal papers, were stolen from the Claimant by G4S at HMP Parc and staff on F wing of HMP Cardiff.
Although there were initial decisions were made to confiscate possessions and legal papers, there were also additional decisions that are now made as of 1st November 2019 and to the present to refuse to return possessions, including legal and medical papers and wheelchair.
Unknown to the Claimant, his sister Celia Jeune, had been told by Probation on 31 October 2019, an unclear account of how the Claimant would be released from HMP Parc early on the 1 November 2019 and that the Claimant must as a part of licence conditions, immediately travel to meet a probation officer in Taunton by early that afternoon.
Therefore, Celia Jeune arranged a car be there to take the then 74-year old Claimant from HMP Parc to Taunton by early that afternoon
On 1 November 2019 without explanation to the Claimant, the Claimant was forcibly removed from his cell and taken outside of the prison and placed to sit in a car outside, to impose he leave the prison on licence.
Because the Claimant was forcibly placed in the car and told he must immediately leave HMP Parc and travel to Taunton or else he would be in breach of new licence conditions, it was implicit in these arrangements that the Claimant was forced to travel away without his possession and legal papers being returned to him ever since.
Regards developments since 1 November 2019. Whereas the Claimant had been at a Cardiff Bail Hostel in January and February 2019 and Bradley Hughes of HM Probation Service was enthusiastic and successful in arranging the Claimant’s possessions and legal papers were returned to the Claimant from the Bail Hostel. In contrast neither Probation Officer Brad Hughes nor the Claimant has gained a sensible response from G4S (or any other party) regards the Claimant’s possessions and legal papers that are still held by G4S at HMP Parc.
Similar issues also occurred between December 2018 to February 2019 when at a mid point in his sentence in the Claimant was placed from HMP Parc to the Bail Hostel. But the Defendant(s) had not released possessions including a wheel chair supplied by the Claimant’s brother.
The Claimant filed for Judicial Review with a sealed form 11 October 2019 and a sealed N244 26 November 2019. On 24 January 2020 HHJ Keyser QC said to re-serve the Claim and so the Claimant re-send the Claim forms with this Grounds for Claim. HMP Parc had confiscated it.
Dolmans, South Wales Police solicitors, refuse to comment so to justify an application for Judicial Review. The Claimant understands that in an application for Judicial Review while at the permission stage, that a lay unrepresented Claimant does not need to submit a statement but rather can do so after permission is granted, when it is clearer what the issues are from CPR disclosure.
There is no reason for the decision to withhold the Claimant’s property of legal papers other than to prejudice civil and criminal proceedings.
Request release of medical records held at HMP Parc to Claimant
The Claimant has been unable to get copies of medical records held at HMP Parc and particularly those sent from Caswell Clinic by Dr Gaynor Jones again desperately requested by the Claimant’s Taunton GP.
Special, different and harsher treatment (that was serious abuse) aimed to interfere in the ability of the Claimant to progress his civil claims.
During 2017 to 2019 the Claimant was singled out for special, different and harsher treatment while at HMP Parc and at Cardiff’s Bail Hostel.
There was physical abuse by staff and by other prisoners. Harsher conditions at prison and the bail hostel. Medication was withheld and G4S and parties interfered with correspondence and even withheld letters being sent or received.
The harm caused by interference with the Claimant’s right to receive or send correspondence can be far reaching.
It is important to note that what is certain when we consider the evidence is that the Claimant’s criminal and civil cases involve the multi agency partners and their lawyers using information they very obviously know not to be true.
Therefore, when looking at the involved evidence it can become very obvious indeed that the Defendant(s) aim to interfere with and prevent Claimant from progressing his civil or criminal claims regards G4S, South Wales Police, Dr Tegwyn Williams, Dr Roger Thomas, Professor Rodger Wood, the Defendant’s lawyers and multi agency parties.
Also, the Defendant(s) via multi agency generated false criminal convictions and a false risk assessment and furthermore made that known to the prisoners and supported prisoners to be both violent and intimidating to the Claimant.
When G4S knew what they were saying was untrue, thee South Wales Police included false convictions for ‘child abuse’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘firearms’ so that staff and prisoners were united in being intimidating, menacing and violent o the Claimant.
Obviously, with the Claimant locked in a prison wing with these staff and prisoners and the MAPPA agents causing rumours to harm the Claimant regards ‘child abuse’, ‘narcotics’ and ‘fire-arms’. Then this cumulative effect of all MAPPA agents doing, had an adverse effect on the Claimant’s mental and physical wellbeing, especially, as he had good reason to expect to suffer substantial harm.
The adverse effect of all the above and interference with his correspondence, denied medical care and expecting to suffer substantial physical harm would obviously cause a normal reasonable unrepresented person to not be able to keep pace with complex technical legal proceedings and it follows as reasonable to believe that G4S has interfered with Claimant’s ability to progress his civil claims.
It also follows, to add to the above, that if G4S and in particular, South Wales Police, had corrected their records to be truthful in showing that the doctor (who the Claimant is accused of harassing) does wrong, then the Claimant would not be in prison.
Claimant Caswell Clinic diagnosed with ‘significant brain damage’
The evidence shows as very obvious that the Claimant was only in prison due to South Wales Police bringing prosecutions using information they knew was not true, with the result that either the sentence was not proportionate and was too harsh or to mean the Claimant should not even have been prosecuted. And may be the doctor should be prosecuted with indictable offenses.
But when all the above is most lengthy, complex and technical to explain and detail HHJ Keyser QC has told the unrepresented Claimant to resubmit this application for Judicial Review in such a rushed and short time scale so that the Claimant is unable to detail all of the huge horrific interference that has occurred and link each of the many acts or omissions to relevant law.
Direction is sought with regards which losses and damage for interference in civil claims should come under for example, a new High Court Queens Bench Claim, as opposed to Judicial Review. The current criminal conduct by the Welsh authorities on T20200177 Exeter Crown Court proceedings is deliberate to pervert the course of justice and trial should be heard opposite the victim’s home.
The Law
Although the Claimant assumes there will be long standing laws regards prisoners not having their possessions returned, the Claimant understands that in modern times the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8 right to respect for private and family life is more commonly used.
The Claimant understands that the interpretations or threshold of Article 8 right to respect for private and family life very strongly supports interpretations that Claimant’s legal papers and possessions should be returned to him. ECHR case ‘Gold and Silver’, ‘rings a bell.’
The Claimant understands it is long established that the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8 right to respect for private and family life gives a protection that there should be no interference with correspondence and post and this has now been proved at HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc
The Claimant understands that under 1988 Human Rights Act if prison staff wish to search legal papers then the prisoner must be present.
Furthermore, the Claimant understands that generally speaking it is said Human Rights lawyers say to emphasise the word “respect” and how there is a right to “respect” of the rights that arise under the Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8.
The Claimant understands it is long established that prison staff should not interfere in the right to receive and send correspondence, particularly so when the correspondence relates to progressing legal cases against the Welsh authorities.
We are aware that the ECHR/Human Rights Act 1998 Article 8 is a qualified right that can be interfered with if there is justification.
If interference in the qualified right occurs, then the reasons for the decision to interfere should be given
The Claimant is aware that public bodies must give reasons and explanations for Decisions.
The Defendant(s) have given reasons that are primarily a tissue of lies
The Claimant seeks to be helpful and has kept this application brief. If G4S and south Wales Police now give reasons, then the Claimant seeks opportunity to reply by an amended Grounds for Claim and Statement. Hence a statement is not yet submitted until the Claimant knows the reasons what the police and G4S may give.
Withheld Medical Treatment
Withholding medical treatment is normally regarded as a breach of the Human Right Act Article 8 right to respect for private and family life.
False criminal history released to prisoners who were encouraged to attack violently
The Defendant and the Multi Agency partners generated and used a false criminal history and a false risk assessment which they knew were not true, and which were false in many ways, but included wrongly asserting child abuse, narcotics, (cultivating supply and use), ABH and firearms convictions and future risk.
Creating this specific kind of false risk assessment to the Claimant who is locked inside a prison wing with staff and prisoners who all seek harm (and substantial harm that goes with this type of problem) is both mentally and physically threatening so that the Claimant had sound reason to believe that serious harm may occur to him. To therefore reach the high threshold of Article 3 cruel and degrading treatment.
The Claimant knows that all data laws and rules have come from ECHR Article 8 right to respect for private and family life and that a European Human Rights defamatory type of attack on a person using false ‘risk assessment’ that is fabricated is a breach of ECHR/Human Rights Act 19988 Article 8 right to respect to private and family life.
Remedy Sought
The Claimant asks for a Court Order for the South Wales Police, HMP Cardiff and G4s run HMP Parc to immediately return his possessions and legal papers, including his wheelchair.
Additionally, the Defendant/Claimant seeks for release of his medical records held at HMP Parc, including those sent from Caswell Clinic, to HMP Parc. For both HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc to release to the Claimant, in these criminal proceedings, all his correspondence so far referred to in T2020177 criminal proceedings.
Compensation for abuse and Compensation for any harm, lost opportunity and losses in the civil claims.
To comply with HHJ Keyser QC’s Directions and time scale means the Claimant has to submit and re-serve papers at short notice without the Claimant having access to legal advice and not having time to detail facts in ways to match which laws are relevant.
Direction is sought as to which grievances of the Claimant can be dealt with via Judicial Review and which ones by a new Claim.
I believe the contents of this Grounds for Claim to be true.
Welsh authority expected to steal my letters in and out of its prisons, over a ten year period and expect to get away with it …..disgusting little individuals
FAO of Exeter Crown Court/HMP Cardiff/HMP Parc/South Wales Police REDACTED
Case management T20300177 is the question of how the court and jury need to know:
That the ‘bad character’ evidence totally contradicts itself and becomes obvious evidence of the corruption that occurred in prosecutions and convictions, based on evidence that police and complainant knew, was neither true, accurate nor complete.
For example, if the ‘bad character’ evidence is reliable? That would mean doctor TW, who colluded with errant South Wales police officers in the 2009 ‘deactivated’ Lewis gun failed prosecution, was being honest. If the doctor was honest and correct that means I was then and am now far too ill with ‘significant irreversible brain damage’ and Paranoid Delusional Disorder PDD to organise my case for tomorrow. The hearing of 22 Dec 2020 should not proceed as planned due to my medical state.
Also, if the doctor and ‘bad character’ evidence is reliable (with irreversible conditions) then I was and am too ill to have received the sentences I received from 2010 to 2019 or receive as severe bail conditions and a sentence even if convicted in case T20200177.
Another major contradiction is if the ‘bad character’ evidence is true, obviously I would not be able to write from prison as all mail would be MAPPA2/3 monitored and it was xxxxxxxxxxx duty to question how the prison’s failure to supervise a high profile alleged offender is what caused her ‘harassment’ and G4S, HMP Cardiff and Parc Governors ought to be in the dock not me. A prisoner could not know that passing a letter for MP, for the authorities to decide if it could be sent, would cause harassment?
Please could the CPS explain this legal point in if the ‘bad character’ evidence is true I could not harass a person from prison as I would not know what experts who monitor my mail at a prison authority decides to send would amount to harassment? Where are my letters to Secretary for State for Wales and John Graham if they are not relevant?
The CPS cannot have it both ways. They need to be absolutely clear about my state of mind and health. Does the detail in the ‘bad character ‘evidence mean
If the ‘bad character’ evidence is true then I am “too ill” to manage proceedings on 22 December 2020 and following?
If he ‘bad character’ evidence is true that means I am so very ill that the CPS and court explore whether to drop the case on compassionate grounds?
Or as the detail in the ‘bad character’ evidence says I am so very ill the CPS agree I should agree I receive a much more minor sentence if convicted next year.
It follows if I do not have ‘significant irreversible brain damage’ and PDD then the CPS cannot use the ‘bad character’ as reliable or else the CPS will be committing a criminal wrong of deceit before an English Crown Court?
If the CPS says the ‘bad character’ evidence is true could the CPS explain exactly how the conditions I am supposed to have affects these proceedings and if convicted? In the Tony Martin case, who shot young burglars as they fled his property, he only had a three-year sentence when I have had five-years for simply saying the ‘truth’.
Please see my 1CF03361 Cardiff County Court documents to understand the medical evidence and it’s context and how it was deliberately falsified to try to lock me away, indefinitely, in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital as MAPPA 3/3 victim of the State ( within top 5% most dangerous in the UK)‘too ill’, when the 2009 prosecution conspiracy started failing (3rd day of trial, 2nd day of prosecution evidence).
Errant police used TW to have me prosecuted 4 times from 2010 to2019 on the basis that the medical evidence was true and I was unreasonable with harassment to object.
But Errant elements of the South Wales Police and the doctor (now sacked by the NHS) who colluded with them, used false medical evidence they obviously knew to be false and misleading at the Cardiff courts from August 2009 up to the present day.
It was xxxxxxxxxx who is supposed to have arranged someone to talk with me to explore how she may take up the casework of people who act for the authorities having been very dishonest in creating this kind of ‘bad character’ evidence, based on what ‘they know is not true’.
It is all too complicated for me to write to xxxxxxxx Someone is needed to talk through the issues with me on the phone or in person. As it was xxxxxxxxxxx job to arrange someone to speak with me, on these severe G4S/HMP Cardiff/police bullying issues, I could not possibly know that my asking for help, xxxxxxxxxxx and highly privileged to help a xxxxxxxxxxxx, was interrupted as ‘harassment’.
Subsequently, I found xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, was blocking my correspondence.
Also where legal casework jams-up by no obvious procedure like the notorious1997 Prevention of Harassment Act , to resolve matters and veers towards to ‘no course in law’, that is where a xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is supposed to, without bias, intervene on behalf of their xxxxxxxxxx. So how can I “know or ought to know” that using a correct laid down process is harassment?
Of course, if the court in case proceeds on the basis I am medically fit and in a fairly normal state of health for someone of my age, then the jury need to explore all these contradictions in the evidence of ‘bad character’ and hear from many witnesses with regards the contradictions and dishonesty in papers used by the CPS (Wales) and of why the falsification of ‘bad character’ evidence by errant welsh police was a wrongdoing that xxxxxxxxxx appears to knowingly ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
Was it not wrong of the same welsh authority who, alone, had my name removed from the UK’s veterinary register, again fabricate false conviction in order to give me a ‘hard time’ in G4S HMP Parc, including ‘child abuse,’ ABH, firearms and narcotics?
John’s letter from my prison cell, allegedlY stuffed with an unidentified ‘white powder’ caused my many months in gaol only for the charge, under the 2002 Prevention of Terrorism AcT,to be dropped
HM Crown Prosecution Service (England)
Dear Mr Evans,
I will have had to attend my Taunton hospital, GP’s surgery and special clinics at least five times this week all because the welsh judiciary criminal conduct. G4S run Park Prison, in Bridgend, South Wales, failed to prescribe to me my daily need of Omeprazole following a spectacular flying accident training for a James Bond film.
I suggest you English Crown Court barristers and solicitors have strayed away from what was relevant and why I have been incarcerated in welsh prisons for around five years of my life and why a van load of welsh coppers travelled, in 2002, to my Royal College of Veterinary surgeons’ disciplinary enquiry to lie through their teeth for a few days in order to curtail my income to fight their inherent deceit.
That failed so I was unlawfully sectioned under s35 of 1968 Mental Health Act, in 2009 , with full support from ten welsh judges and locked up in Caswell Clinic thoroughly terrified for my life. Another police attempt to stop my BS614159 +2 civil damages claims, arising from 40 odd inept failed malicious criminal prosecutions requiring, incidentally, no legal representation and a precious few defence witnesses, required to correctly be expedited.
You know or you ought to know, that the South Wales Police’s 3rd attempt to stop my multimillion pound damages claim fell right into their laps, in 2009, when the Nottinghamshire police had misguidedly handed over my replica dummy Lewis machine-gun, after confiscating it from the new owner, to South Wales Police police officers, in the dead of night, at an M5 Service Station
The devil worshipping Taffia had persuaded the English authorities, including you, despite having arrested and had interviewed the new owners of the dummy gun off my replica DH2 Battle of the the Somme biplane, I flew in the Farnborough air show, that the film prop was a prohibited weapon contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act.
Only this month the welsh police have had to, despite my eleven years of court applications for disclosure in the corrupt Cardiff criminal and civil so called courts of law, finally release twenty odd files of critical prosecution evidence that should have been served on me in Cardiff prison before the 2010 equally ridiculous ‘trading in machine gun’ jury trial.
Eight of the jury in a Cardiff pub told us afterwards that it was obvious to them there had been a police plant amongst them and my cross examination of prosecution witnesses, by the third, second day of evidence, I had been ‘stitched-up.’
It now appears the welsh police, on snatching the film prop from the English authorities, whipped it straight back to Bridgend HQ and disposed of the blocked ‘barrel’ in exchange for an already condemned 0.410 single shot gun barrel found around the police armoury there. the welsh police and also had painted the film prop back to black as the colour, when I had been in possession of it as a harmless piece of scrap iron BUT to fool the jury.
So, Mr Evans of CPS HQ, Rupert Street, Bristol, it must be of no surprise to you and your army of queen square barristers, that John Graham Esq, having had to resort over a year of procrastination by your colleagues, to finally write to and make boyo HM Minister of Justice, Robert Buckland, to ordering the release of my letter to him, allegedly sent by me in May 2019, believed to be stuffed with heroin or was it anthrax, I forget what the august 2019 interrogating police in HMP Parc told me.
No one will give me a useable CD copy of that welsh police August 2019 interrogation, under caution or sight even of my letter to JG or Alun Cairns MP, when asking for help, for fear of internet publicity, as the Police QC, Lloyd Williams, stressed in the last machine gun civil claim hearing due ,again, incourt on the 18th December 2020 at Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre
[Lunch on me, as usual]
But I wrote to Mr Graham’s MP, Mr Burn, in Bournemouth from my welsh prison about the South Wales Police bullying but the prison staff stopped some of those letters as well. I ask you, HM Prosecutor, for copy of them, along with John Graham’s letter from me, as is my right under CPR.
My 18th December 2020 Cardiff County Court 1CF03361′ machine gun damages claim hearing needs the public gallery stuffed full as it is the only way left, apart from PLAN J, of course, in order that I get appropriate compensation from a near three decades of welsh police and welsh law courts flagrant criminality.
In a secret Cardiff Crown Court , on 2nd December 2009, a police blackmailed quite unqualified welsh doctor tendered to the presiding judge, in my absence, when not represented, a fictitious account of how I had ‘irreversible brain damage’, to be MAPPA level 3 Category 3 partly due to my having ditched in the Caribbean and been a long term drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed Esq
I offer, again, in agreeing in some appropriate restraining order under s5 of the 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act if you agree to cause immediate recovery of my welsh prison medical records so desperately needed RIGHT NOW, my wheelchair, my clothes and my shoes, my Caswell Clinic records and why the G4S robbery was needed?
You know, Mr NC Evans, the South Wales Chief Constable defends my multi -million pound ‘machine gun’ damages claim, in court on the 18th, so this criminal conduct by his officers, in this past two years, will be of no surprise to those who have followed my web sites on welsh police brutality since 1990
[Actually, a series of flying incidents back in the 70s, during my flights to Northern Ireland to ‘flight in duck and geese’ and Enniskillen Harriers Hunt Ball or to see my brother, Michael, resulting in a pushed in roof of a Pembrokeshire police car, Manx kippers spread all over Swansea runway and a Dutchman’s fortunately witnessing welsh police bullying at Cardiff airport all resulting in an acquittal or ‘offer no evidence’, is the cause of this latest pack of lies, Mr Evans , from the welshing inherently deceitful that, sadly, still dominate the Welsh so called ‘authorities’.
So, Mr Crown Prosecutor, what are your statutory duties, as laid down laid down by Criminal Procedural Rules because the welsh courts ‘do not give a damn’ about the ‘rule of law’ if it decisions may cause political embarrassment to to their own county folk?
I contacted the Avon and Somerset Police, to no avail of course, to have sight, at least, of my letters to MPs, including Mr Burns and and Alun Cairns and mine, allegedly, to J Graham Esq, all used to have me gaoled for most of last year, without a conviction.
But the welsh bstds will not even disclose all of those to you, will they? I might be advised to suggest that those entangled in this welsh filth of avarice and spite, from cross the river, first check the data from those in Bridgend police HQ as authentic?
John Graham Esq has written again to Robert Buckland QC trying to get back his prison correspondence I had him from various welsh prisons, allegedly full of ‘anthrax’ spores, heroin or some white powder smelling remarkably like tooth paste.
I also have been trying to obtain, for over a year, my G4S prison stolen medical records back together with my wheelchair and legal papers relating to my current two million pound damages claims, case numbers , BS614159, 1CF03361 and a few more.
I have sought help from my Devon MP, whilst in Covid 19 isolation but Ms Selaine Saxby’s letter’s to the welsh authorities are also ignored, of course, with John’s alleged letter now, I am told was seized by the vindictive South Wales Police in May 2019 to unlawfully fabricate the successful excuse that I be incarcerated in Exeter prison for the ‘rest of the that year.
So, I have written again to my local Taunton police who appear to be struggling in understanding why the clear level of ‘animus’, deceit and malice against old harmless me, continues to drift south across the River Severn?
FAO
Duty Officer @ Police Station
Taunton Somerset
25th November 2020
Dear Sir,
South Wales Police Perversion of Justice
Further to my conversation today with PC Mark Jones of the South Wales Police Professional Standards Department , re my complaint over a strange ‘white powder’ being sent to HM Secretary of State for Wales, then Alun Cairns MP, from my Cardiff prison cell together with, allegedly, a similar letter to John Graham Esq, also believed to be stuffed with heroin, I update re my complaint.
John Graham Esq is refused my letter to him and the welsh police and prison authorities continue to ignore both his and my FOI and Data Protection Act applications.
n a few days G4S, who had me seriously bullied in HMP Parc, Bridgend, as a convicted paedophile, have but a few days left to file some semblance of a defence in my half million pound damages claim for the injury they did to me, last year, when spreading false criminal convictions around the 800 odd prisoners that I had for child abuse, firearms and narcotics.
am now in possession of a copy of a South Wales Police application for an exhibit ARH/1, from my 2010 Cardiff Crown court trial, described by the prosecution in its MG3 address to the Cardiff Crown Court jury, by police female under-over agent, code name ‘Foxy’, describing it as a Lewis Machine-gun with ammunition. She, incidentally, became a ‘he’ when he gave evidence about nine months and a week after her conversation with both Mrs Kirk and myself when expressing a wish to buy it.
prosecution exhibit was described by your counterpart’s HQ, in Bridgend, as a lethal barrelled firearm capable of firing more than one round of ammunition from a single pressure on the trigger while the asking the presiding judge for the mandatory 10 year prison term, five for ‘possession’ and five or the selling of what was at most, with a stretch of a vivid imagination, a single shot .410 shot gun!
My one million-pound BS614159 +2 civil damages claim, arising from 40 odd lost South Wales Police malicious criminal prosecutions, was listed for a two-month substantive hearing in January 2010 and, at all costs, had to be stopped. Evidence was scheduled to be taken from around 300 witnesses, nearly all comprising of serving police or retired police officers.
When its machine-gun prosecution went ‘pear-shaped in May 2009, following my complaint taken to HRH The Price of Wales, at Highgrove, about the extreme and unusual level of corruption found in both the local police force and the Cardiff law courts, implicating both CPS and its judges, the police , instead, had me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act.
While investigating officers .ordered to film my cashe of machine gun rounds in my office and film the forensic stripping examination of the alleged machine-gun the police refuse, contrary to numerous judge’s orders……..
Statement of Maurice John Kirk: To whom it may concern
and that includes you, Robert Buckland, HM Minister of Justice
‘Unfortunate Collateral Collusion‘ – LAW IN ACTION BBC4 tonight
That is what the welsh police fooled you lot with in England?
A ‘human under cover intelligent force’ HM House of Lords considers next week.
Mr Robert Buckland, from the heart of welsh incestuous judicial inherent deceit,
Please consider, may I suggest,
You chose to not to assist John Graham Esq in having his letter back, of course, snatched by HMP Parc’s G4S badly bullyingly prison, a copy of it stolen by robbery from me on 1stNov 2019, for the South Wales Police. I had purportedly sent to him it from Cardiff prison, in May 2019, laced with 100% pure heroin, prison officers thought. .
Purportedly sprinkled in ‘white powder’, contrary to 2002 Prevention of Terrorism Act, Taunton Crown Court was told, just across road from me! Dear God, give me strength
What utter nonsense you welsh lawyer bstd. I was gaoled for it , despite un-convicted!
Barrister Robin Shellard, of Queens Square Chambers, Bristol, a personal friend of yours, ever since, in various English hood-winked Crown Courts, as HM Crown Prosecutor, has repeatedly promised me, lying againor far more likely, bamboozled by South Wales Police inherent deceit.
l will get John Graham’s letter back along with my HM Secretary of State for Wales’ letter, my local MP for almost 10 years, Alun Cairns MP, succeeding an equally diligent John Smith MP to ‘help’ constituency members.
So, where is it, Mr Robert Buckland?
John, a demonstration in Whitehall appears appropriate ?
Robin Shellard,? Do you or your HM Prosecutor, Mr NC Evans, of Bristol’s HM Crown Prosecution Service office welsh designated , in 2009, to cover -up the welsh police machine gun conspiracy, know where my letters are, key prosecution exhibits, my letters, simply asking for help?
If Mr Graham cannot get back my allegedly sent Cardiff prison letter to him, that had me gaoled in Exeter prison for so many weeks, YOU idiots or are you, to drop the criminal charge against me for sending it, despite my Exeter Crown Court voracious expletives wishing to the contrary, are the Welsh Authorities, who started this vendetta nearly three decades ago, by having me struck off as a veterinary surgeon and destroying my family life, going to be allowed to get away with it, yet again?
Dream on, you ‘jobs for life’ dreamers, I am still breathing and I have not even changed up to 2nd gear, yet.
Has not the real welsh reason dawned on you , Mr Buckland and your side kick, fellow barrister, Robin Shellard, why the South Wales Police had. yet again, fabricated the whole bl..dy nonsense in the first place.
After my last eleven years, with five of them in welsh prisons, the South Wales Police conspiracy of my ‘trading in machine guns’, in order to stop my BS614159 civil claim arising from the chief constable having lost over 40 odd maliciously brought criminal prosecutions. it is finally blown apart.
I am, at last, in possession of 20 odd arch lever police files of which many were illegally police/Dolmans withheld from my February 2010 jury trial facing a mandatory 10 year prison term.
SUMMARY
Upon my incarceration in Caswell Clinic in July 2009 in an attempt to avoid the ‘machine-gun trial, as by 23rd June 2009 Nottinghamshire police had already examined the replica, after taking statements from the new owners, the Coopers, to confirm it was pieces of water pipe and plumber’s scrap put together as a make believe Battle of the Somme Lewis Machine Gun.
I invite readers of this website, from all around the world, to stimulate my ideas as to what I do with this horde of welsh police/Dolmans criminal conduct bearing in mind , as I quote Voltairam yet again:
‘When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right’
Alex with Snipe just before my DH2 WW1 replica with decommissioned Lewis machine gun flew at the 2000 Farnborough International Air Show following a specific order from Captain Brian Trubshaw of 002 fame.
All this was withheld from me while smouldering in my Cardiff prison cell. for nearly eight months, until the Cardiff Crown Court farcical hearing ( see full transcript illegally withheld from me for over 10years despite having paid a string of corrupt solicitors, in advance, to grab it before it was shredded like my RCJ’s RCVS tapes of John Thomas LCJ admitting the multiple errors, at last, of my veterinary college’s hearing dependant on south Wales Police voracity or complete lack of it!
The ‘gun’ was videoed, as stripped down by ‘gun’ expert Huxtable at police HQ, to find thieves had ‘raided the larder’ before him. The inside of the replica Lewis was empty, of course, purloined years earlier due to the weapons WW1 parts value, to build a second but working Lewis this time, were nnever in my ‘possession’ The mere weight of it was a give away.
The South Wales Police , in desperation, therefore switched its senior officer MAPPA level 3 category 3 committee conspiracy, on 7th August 2009 and blackmailed their doctor for ‘sexual indiscretions in Caswell Clinic with Dr Roger Thomas as one of the ring leaders.
Caswell clinic staff, with judge Richard Thomlow, then the bent HM Crown Prosecutor, had a secret hearing with a certain Crown Court judge , without my knowing of it, until 2020, to have me locked away in Ashworth high security psychiatric prison for life.
Note the welsh police waited until 13th July 2009 before recording it was going to ‘examine’ Exhibit ARH 1
So where are the photos of the remaining machine gun components
Deliberate lies to deliberately cover- up, first by the South Wales Police and then Adrian Oliver of Dolmams , solicitors, defending the Chief Constable, ‘shoot to kill’ Barbara Wilding, in order to stop my 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecution 1CF03361+2 damages claim , requiring well in excess of 200 witnesses, nearly all police officers
The sheer spite and greed in Adrian Oliver, senior partner of Dolmans, manifests itself time and time again in these last new thirty years, that he was actually present at my 18th June 2009 impromptu visit to police HQ, Bridgend with my ‘witness statements’ for ‘mutual ‘exchange’ clearly tucked under my arm’ is revealed.
Only this week, with my having to spend many hundreds of pounds having the recently acquired withheld police files scanned, again, as the court had heard, he and his QC, Lloyd Williams, feared if I ever laid my hands on this vast treasure trove of police/lawyer deceit, as all implicated are immune to prosecution , of course, by not simply emailing me the 20 odd arch leaver files it would frustrate my prosecution by even more months.
Now and lest we forget, only due to a cock-up for Judge Keiser’s absence from court in October had ‘triggered’ this discovery that now needs and English police force to cause a criminal investigation,
Lloyd Williams QC in on the act back in 2000 in Bristol County Court
Andrew Keiser QC , the HHJ Beard QC court had heard this Summer, from leading police counsel , had already decided to be the jury trial judge and had already fixed my machine gun damages claim, ‘behind closed doors’.
Barrister Lloyd Williams told the startled new judge, clearly unaware of the daily level of deceit, to expect, metered out in welsh law courts, was going to be no jury and Keiser will dispose of the 200 odd witnesses within no more than five days!
“Are you gentlemen looking for machine-guns, by any chance, as Jacques and I were surrounded at Bridgend’s South Wales Police HQ, by armed police in tin hats and sporting flak jackets and stun grenades?”
Readers, I am only on the first 100 odd pages in these approximate 3000 pages of police conspiracy withheld relevant documentation, from my bemused jury, including key eye witness MG 11 statements taken down before the January 2010 trial, number T20097445 had even started.
All 10 years too late for my two million pound civil damages claim, Case number BS614169 +2, delayed, of course, by most senior judge of the welsh courts, Seys Llewellyn QC (quaintly corrupt).
Seys Llewellyn , after his ridiculous BS case judgement, had deliberately waited 16 months, no less, before the the law could be changed for a mere Englishman was no longer able to appeal it to HM Royal Courts of Justice,
Clever was he not? Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had waited until his day of retirement to simply ‘seal’ his court order’ in order for HM Criminal Court of Appeal, in law be allowed to hear it BUT now only in the same incestuous court in the Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre ..
Meantime, Luigi Stranati, court manager, if not caught red handed emptying my 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates court room of chairs to prevent my followers, like Sabine MacNeill and 20 others being allowed into the clandestine despicably run hearing, to witness my cooked-up ‘restraining order’ conviction, he takes it upon himself , then as Wales regional manger , to ban my entry yo yhe public counter for 10 years.
Why, you may well ask, to prevent my obtaining the transcript of BS614159 +2 civil claims, in order to appeal it or the copy of the court log notorious in my decades suffering under the stench of welsh civil and criminal court rooms .
All refused to this day, of course.
My diagnosed history is ‘highly complex, convoluted and difficult to understand’. ‘The clinical picture appears to be of a man who has always had a background of minor cognitive difficulties (poor writing and spelling)’ I, apparently, ‘developed a personality characterised by ‘narcissism (an abnormal sense of entitlement), grandiosity (believing that normal rules and regulations do not apply to me) and paranoia (believing I am the victim of persecution). I also show evidence of poor judgement.
‘impulsivity and a willingness to hold myself hostage by way of hunger strike in an attempt to manipulate his environment’. [I have never lost a hunger strike] Whilst these personality characteristics have undoubtedly overshadowed my life and probably had a negative affect on my social and family functioning, they appear to have been reasonably stable throughout my life.
However, as for myself and the evidence both suggest that over the past two years both my functioning has deteriorated and that my beliefs have ” become more intense and overwhelming and at sometimes, though not others, are clearly abnormal. I now show clear evidence of some degree of neuro-cognitive damage (brain damage), probably as a result of a combination of normal ageing, previous heavy alcohol misuse and deceleration injuries following plane crashes.
Brain scans both before this ‘opinion’, in Texas, England and Wales and after, in France and Wales, identified no damage beyond the normal aging parameters. Where is the evidence of alcohol abuse other than having been, briefly, a drinking partner of my dear old friend, actor, Oliver Reed?
‘Deceleration’ injuries, as being a possible factor, is totally fabricated to justify quite unqualified Professor Rodger Wood using me as a human guinea pig, in Caswell Clinic for SPEC brain scans in August 2009, requiring intravenous radio isotopes into my brain. I have experienced significant hearing difficulties ever since.
The specific area of brain damage affects my ability to monitor and control my behaviour, decreases self-awareness, judgement and decision making abilities and have compounded my paranoid beliefs to the extent that when subjected to further stress, my beliefs intensify so that for periods they have a quality of a paranoid delusional disorder (mental illness characterised by fixed false beliefs unamenable to reason of a paranoid nature). Poor judgment, alright, in my believing normal standards within the local law courts and local police force would be on a par to those in England!
‘ Welsh Authority’ is reliant on the doctor’s premise that I suffer misbelief in what the South Wales Police has done to me and my family.
With regard to treatment, neither my underlying personality nor brain damage will respond to medical intervention. Due to the transient nature of my clearly abnormal beliefs (as opposed to my general paranoid view of the world) it is unlikely that medication will make any significant impact, though it is impossible to be certain. Appropriate medication, apparently, has been offered which I have refused.
The relative safety of Cardiff prison within that s35 three-month horror, as a ‘human guinea pig’ for couple of ignorant clinicians to play games, cannot be expunged from my mind.
Clinically it is unclear whether my brain damage is likely to progress. Should it do so my difficulties will become more marked and I will become more obviously disabled. Of particular concern is that this may well involve increasing impulsivity and poor judgement, features which are already apparent.
With regard to risk, risk is always difficult to quantify especially in highly complex cases such as this and it is also impossible to consider my risk in isolation from those who I may encourage to act on my behalf.
Where is the proof of this police doctor’s ‘mumbo jumbo’? What was the ‘appropriate’ medication?
My remedy is very simple, the Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary stops the campaign of police bullying and deceit or stop losing cases in your own police courts.
‘The risk of my continuing with my actions against South Wales Police and acting in a way that I feel justified to achieve my ends is high’, though whether I myself would be involved in inter-personal violence is less, is cannot be discounted. I am also told nor can the risk that others would act violently without my encouragement. If my condition is progressive, these risks are likely to increase. It cannot be discounted I may, someday without help from my MP, fall under a bus, the prize idiot.
If this Caswell Clinic diagnosis is true then the validity of my five years in Welsh prisons must be in doubt.
I therefore, in the absence of help, change my plea to that of insanity,
I wish to make an application at your earliest available court for an outside police force to investigate as to why neither the South Wales Police and now, nor will the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigate fraud.
Clerk to HM Crown Court
The Shire Hall
Taunton
Somerset TA1 4EU
13th Nov 2020
(By hand)
Dear Sir/Madam,
South Wales Police fraud
I wish to make an application at your earliest available court for an outside police force to investigate as to why neither the South Wales Police and now, nor will the Avon and Somerset Constabulary, investigate fraud.
This, again, implicates a number of CPS and Dolmans lawyers and senior police officer in South Wales (see failed disclosure in Exeter Crown court proceedings) and why the violent 1st Nov 2019 robbery on me by G4S HMP Parc staff was so instructed to purloin my court & medical papers in order obstruct my court claims against them and dep-rive my Taunton GP now a consultant is involved following the prison denying my essential daily Omeprazole.
My written complaints to each police force, both stating my letters to Alun Cairns MP and John Graham were stuffed with heroin or similar substance ,contrary to the 2001 Prevention of Terrorism Act, neither Mr Graham, prosecution witness turned defence witness, nor myself can obtain.
Of these missives we are denied sight of originals or even purported photo copies of either all for one very good reason, The welsh three decades of nefarious conduct is now, at last, starting to fall apart around their ears.
As neither police force, one year on, still will not recover my stolen G4S property or retrieve my purported two letters I ask that this, my application, be expedited.
Thankyou,
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
tel 07708586202
maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
MY reply from complaint to Independent Office of
JUST HOW MUCH MORE INCESTUOUS CAN THIS COVER-UP GET?
!enquiries
11:30 (53 minutes ago)
to me
Dear Maurice Kirk,
Thank you for contacting the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). We acknowledge the details of your complaint against South Wales Police. The IOPC case reference number is 2020/145308. Please use this if you contact us regarding this matter.
We are completely independent of the police service and are responsible for making sure that the police complaints system in England and Wales works effectively and fairly. Our role at this stage is to forward your complaint to the relevant police force, which must decide whether to record the complaint.
Recording means that a record is made of the complaint giving it formal status as a complaint under the Police Reform Act 2002. I have therefore passed the matter to the Professional Standards Department (PSD) of South Wales Police.
Please contact them directly if you have not had a response from them using the details below: South Wales PoliceProfessional Standards DepartmentTy Richard ThomasNewlands AvenueBrackla Industrial EstateBridgendCF31 2DATel: 01656 655 555Email: Professional.standards@South-Wales.pnn.police.uk If you have any further information you wish to pass on, please forward it directly to the PSD using the above details.
You should, usually, hear from the PSD within 15 working days. However, given the current corona virus (Covid-19) pandemic it may take longer for the PSD to be in contact. Yours sincerely,
James BromleyCustomer Contact Advisor Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) PO Box 473 Sale M33 0BW Email: enquiries@policeconduct.gov.ukWebsite: www.policeconduct.gov.uk Follow us on twitter @policeconductFind out how we handle your personal data How satisfied were you with your experience with the IOPC’s Customer Contact Centre? Let us know by taking this short survey.All information will be treated in accordance with the Data Protection Act. Os bydd arnoch angen yr arolwg hwn yn Gymraeg, cysylltwch â ni ar userfeedback@policeconduct.gov.uk os gwelwch yn dda. This message and its content may contain confidential, privileged or copyright information. They are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, you must not disclose, copy, distribute or take any action which relies on the contents. Instead, please inform the sender and then permanently delete it. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the IOPC. Only specified staff are authorised to make binding agreements on behalf of the IOPC by email. The IOPC accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The IOPC cannot guarantee the security of this email or any attachments. While emails are regularly scanned, the IOPC cannot take any liability for any virus that may be transmitted with the internet. The IOPC communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and or attachments may be read by monitoring staff….
Dear Mr Stellard,
Is it the 4th or 5th occasion that I have heard from you and counterparts, in your absence, assure me that the South Wales Police will disclose to you my original letter to JOHN GRAHAM Esq, from Cardiff prison and my one to alun Cairns MP.
But you very well know the South Wales Police and G4S are congenital liars, proven so many times in the past.
I will be seeking an urgent application at my nearest HM Crown Court, Taunton’s across the road, for and outside police force to be called in to investigate on how the South Wales Police have, yet again, hood-winked English authorities, this time, the Avon & Somerset Constabulary and HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) ,meaning you
Prison staff, you must have been made aware of by now, told me that the ‘white powder’, regularly found in my outgoing mail, was assumed to be the heroin that I had routinely been supplying my Vale of Glamorgan member of parliament, Alun Cairns MP. The ‘white powder’, stinking remarkably of prison issue toothpaste’ appears to have put me in no alternative position but to obtain a witness statement for my next court application ,shortly. from Alun Cairns MP.
Were we go again, this time English lawyers cashing in on their immunity to prosecution when employed by bent Welsh clients like some of those in the South Wales judiciary I have encountered over the last near thirty years.
I was forced to explain, publically, to HM Recorder of Exeter Crown Court,that the South Wales Police , with malice aforethought, covered up Alun Cairns MP’s involvement in my being accused of running a thriving business in the narcotics trade from my F block psychiatric wing of HMP Cardiff
rough draft
1. Between a day in May 2019 and June 2019 G4S staff at HMP Cardiff conducted a 32 minute cell search,with drug sniffer dogs, in the absence of the occupant, Maurice Kirk.
2. My Kirk who was locked, throughout the search, in the shower room in his wheelchair.
3. This prisoner’s correspondence was taken from his F block cell and possibly along with his BS614159 and 1CF03361 civil claim papers during his time locked in the shower
4. Both civil claims resulted from South Wales Police’s 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions and the notorious Maurice ‘trading in machine guns’ acquittal, requiring no defence or summing up , what so ever.
5. Late police disclosure reveals both John Graham’s and then HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP’s letters from Mr Kirk were amongst documents stolen from his cell or in the days shortly after in June 2019 all allegedly containing ‘ an unknown ‘harmless white powder’;6. Late disclosure by way of Mr Kirk’s police interrogation on 1st August 2019 and witness statements by prominent eye witnesses revealed the ‘investigation was still ongoing .
6. On 1st November 2019 Mr Kirk was violently ejected from the prison but G4S refusing to give him any of the contents of his cell , no doubt , handed over to the defendant in the multi-million pound damages claims
7. Mr Kirk wrote to MPs both before and since his 2019 incarceration in HMP Parc but still unable to recover his incriminating property that included his Caswell Clinic medical records sent to the prison by Dr Gaynor Jones
8. On 1st November 2019 G4S staff handed to the driver of a car, picking up Mr Kirk, a package of Cardiff prison stopped letters , both in or out of prison with a 2nd bundle of prison stopped letters addressed to or from HMP Parc, Bridgend.
9. John Graham’s ‘stopped’ letters were found in both prison’s letter bundles (containing many 1st class stamps) but no letter, purportedly from Mr Kirk , with ‘white powder’ the exhibit relied on for the criminal charge that had Mr Kirk imprisoned for a long time until the charge was dropped.
10. Similarly , Mr Kirk’s letters purported to Alun Cairns MP and other MPs with ‘white powder’ could not be found in the returned HMP Parc letter bundles on the 1st November 2019
JOHN , that was a draft on my personal involvement so, please, to enlighten an outside police force invetigation list audit trail of welsh authorities putting up two fingers to0 your FOI and Data Protection Act requests.
My current website, mauricejohnkirk.com reminds you that G4S, at HMP Parc, was clearly immune to prosecution when robbing me for the machine gun papers for South Wales Police’s defending my various multi million pound damages claims for their 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions, including my ‘trading in machine-guns’ blown conspiracy.
Tomorrow, with the CPS and South Wales Police refusing to disclose its court prosecution exhibits that forced their dropping the proposed charge, I have been supplying HM Secretary of State for Wales with raw undiluted suspect heroin, to John Graham, by mutual consent and to another MP I cannot not name.
(this is only a sound bite precis of the hidden welsh prison records that I am asking you to obtain for our presiding judge.
Mr Stellard , your barrister colleague, Mr Christopher Smythe, one of my proposed witnesses in my action again the South Wales’ judicial authorities, will be only too willing to confirm to you and judge Johnson, I have no doubt , he never found sufficient evidence that I had ever been ‘served’ a restraining order in a December 201i magistrate cell, in the first place, by a cabal of the Taffia that crowed around my open cell door.
HM Crown Prosecutor Evans, remember, who I had deliberately arrested in the foyer of Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre, in order he tell your Bristol Crown Court, on my cross examination, precisely what I wanted.
EVANS “Yes, it was my 2nd preliminary draft of the Magistrate’s proposed ‘restraining order’ offered to me for negotiation but not accepted by me at the cell door
Remember, Mr Stellard , I was then promptly arrested in the Cardiff magistates and handcuffed in my wheelchair, for not attending the 28th Nov 2011 notorious Nigerian, MUSA family six snatched kids by Haringay Council court hearing.
Why? Because the welsh prison deliberately would not allow me to attend!
Mrs Sabine MacNeill tackling fraudulent POWELL lawyers, in Kilburn high street refusing to return its brief to their Musa parents in order to keep stealing the Legal aid money for 6 kids snatched by Haringay county council JOHN GRAHAM ESQ and Coronation Street b..tch debacle is why South Wales Police implicated John Graham as dealing in heroin from me ottonham Police Station
The stupid Taunton Magistrate, Ms Williams, fell for it and even referred to that day’s criminal offence, FTA, of not attending a London court, to oppose my bail application,
She sent me, instead, to Exeter gaol, nine years later. This current incident is again appearing to be fraud to be repeated by the lawyers employed by CPS’s Mr Evans,
No wonder the G4S did such serious bullying of me, all last year, as it was protected by the mickey mouse Min of J J /G4S SPV contract to make it difficult for prisoners from claiming for their injuries.
Lastly, but far from not least, I wrote to you and waited the statutory time , laid down for your CPS Review of the case. This was triggered in the light of the startling new evidence, I referred to in court, of how the South Wales Police are constantly lying to you, as they do, as to just where are the court exhibits John Graham has been denied?
Such is the real risk their not keeping their fat state funded pensions I am putting you on notice I am filing a Judicial Review application in the RCJ in HM Administrative Court without further ado.
If by tomorrow you disclose or give me written assurances that those defence exhibits to which the learned judge considers I am entitled will come to me with the CDs of my two police interviews, under caution, within 10 days then I will turn my ‘guns’ back on the human excrement I so regularly find in Cardiff court rooms.
Sample of stopped letters from John Graham with stamps, from my family and from Sabine MacNeill with no party notified
The South Wales Police again conspire to pervert the course of Justice yet again by having me gaoled for almost all year only to withdraw the two charges under the Terrorism Act, would you believe!
Anything to prejudice my ever increasing number of civil claims for malicious criminal prosecutions due to their deceit and cowardly incessant bullying of me when not, again, prepared to face up to cross examination before an English law court, at long last.
DataProtection@south-wales.pnn.police.uk
15:03 (14 minutes ago)
to me
THE USUAL SOUTH WALES POLICE PREVARICATION
Good Afternoon
Please accept our apologies for the delay in the disclosure of your Subject Access Request
We are doing everything we can to minimise delays to providing a response however we are currently experiencing unprecedented challenges amid the COVID-19 pandemic which will affect our ability to meet our usual standards of compliance. Whilst we will aim to provide responses as soon as possible, we are unable to provide you with an exact date as to when you will receive your disclosure.
Please be assured that we are aware of your request.
Rheolwr Rheoli Data a Datgeliadau | Data Management and Disclosure Unit
Pencadlys Heddlu De Cymru | South Wales Police Headquarters
(: 01656 303444 | Ext: 26662 |
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>
15:16 (5 minutes ago)
MY WELSH PRISON STOPPED LETTERS
Further to my today’s URGENT BAIL VARIATION APPLICATION, based on new evidence yesterday from Mr JOHN GRAHAM (alleged recipient of ‘noxious white powder’ from my Cardiff prison cell) I now have damming corroborated facts that South Wales Police, whilst I was in Exeter prison deliberately perverted the course of justice re again stopping my prison letters to MPs, solicitor, family and Taunton GP — Maurice J Kirk BVSc Tel 07708586202 www.kirkflyingvet.com mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
It will take me a week to get through these illegally withheld prisoner’s mail by South Wales Police and G4S!
Dear Sis,
Owing to my visiting John yesterday, prior to his operation, caused me to now examine the huge pile of stopped G4S Parc and Cardiff prison letters that has been sitting on top of my kitchen cupboard since last year.
This pile almost untouched until now, kept for an ever-hopeful external police force investigation, had been set aside as I was violently ejected from prison on 1st Nov 19 in an act of robbery. These letters, meantime, were being handed back to my driver to take me directly to the nearest English casualty hospital unit across the Severn Bridge.
NB The bundle of my Cardiff Prison ‘stopped letters’ held in the F wing office, for all to see, was not amongst them . The large brown package, amongst that bundle was my two year vindictive prison term appeal from nasty judge Tracy Lloyd Jones who had the stupidity to even lie to my face when saying she could do nothing about (did not have the power’) to cause investigation into the blackmailed forensic psychiatrist’s Caswell clinic fabricated psychiatric reports that has resulted in ruining my family, veterinary and aviation way of life (see transcript) for 5 years of false imprisonment.
Your prison stopped April 19 letter to South Wales Health Board to me, for example, which is a blatant criminal conduct. My welsh police ‘interview’ will be quickly shredded this week, Avon and Somerset police must be persuaded to obtain my November 2019 101 call transcript as a classic example of the welsh police having again been refusing to divulge its content of such significant evidence undermining the prosecution’s cases including in machine-gun fiasco, to again fool the English authorities.
John informed me, after successful surgery, he never had a police interview for an MG 11 witness statement and yet I was charged and gaoled in May 2020 for sending him ‘white powder’ in a letter from my May 19 Cardiff prison cell only to be released in November. [Inadvertent tooth paste glue on back of a court transcript was the mistake].
Prison staff told me, at around that time, after a 32 minute ‘cell search’ with two sniffer dogs(while I was was locked in the shower unit in my wheel chair) it was possibly ‘heroin’ as the same powder appeared same as one sent on same day to Alun Cairns MP
Could Enid Blyton have written better?
Alun has a plethora of documentation, of course, for criminal investigations on his own South Wales Police’s yet another failed conspiracy to secure my minimum 10 year prison term. I have had Alun on listening ‘watch’ about the appalling state of welsh courts, police and prisons for years. IT resulted in my being introduced in Swansea Prison, to Nick Hardwick the then HM Prisons Minister while in my wheel chair.
(TO STOP my 1CF03361 & BS614159 one million pound damages claims resulting from first and second attempts for infinite/indefinite incarcerations)
I have been denied copy of any of my 40/50 odd letters sent out to MPs and Avon and Somerset Police during my 2019 unlawful prison time nor have I yet found any of them in this pile of stopped letters, mainly coming into prison, violently returned to me on 1st Nov 2019.
John Graham’s letter bearing all too precious 1st class stamps I was denied , so often, in wicked welsh prisonssample of my sister’s, Sabine MacNeill’s and John Graham May 2019 stopped prison letters by South Wales Police with none of us being notified
M
Copy of John Graham emails from South Wales Police
Subject: Statement
Good afternoon Mr Graham,
With regards to your previous email confirming your relationship with Mr Maurice Kirk and the fact that you had not received any mail containing a white powder, would you be prepared to provide a statement containing those details and your knowledge of a white powder discovered within letters that you believe to be toothpaste.
Regards
Dear Ms. Richards,
In answer to your enquiry I can confirm I know Maurice Kirk as an acquaintance more than a friend.
I must add I have never received any letter from him with anything resembling a “white powder” attached to it. I understand that this “white powder” in question, after formal forensic investigation, proved to be common toothpaste.
I hope this helps.
Thank you,
J. Graham
BUT THE POLICE HAVE STILL NOT DISCLOSED previously ordered, under CPR, PII, MG6D and OASYS fabricated data , the latter used, incidentally, to have me persecuted for years in welsh prison as a (fictitious) wrongly convicted victim for ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’, ,,,disgusting short arsed vermin.
MY LATEST BLOG ALWAYS ON TOP OF LIST OF BLOGS ON THE RIGHT
Welsh police confiscate my Caswell Clinic medical Records due to Dolmans’ Fraud
Appellant’s 22nd April 2020 Position Statement
1. Notwithstanding the fact that this Appellant’s contentious court cases primarily originate from South Wales with its unique jurisdiction it is never too late for a little truth, honesty and sense of fair play to prevail. 2. Notwithstanding the fact of a serious injustice concerning the division of the family’s assets, taking full advantage of his emotional mental state at the time and absence of proper legal representation, the current removing of the Respondent’s name from French property deeds was always the prime responsibility of the Respondent from the moment the UK property deeds were settled. 3. Notwithstanding the fact that the Appellant had abided by 26th March 2013 court order, within the 48 days, the other party has not possibly due to there having been no financial incentive. This has left a substantial loss for the Appellant due to his inability to sell off the French properties. 4. Notwithstanding the fact the Welsh authorities had fabricated Appellant with false criminal convictions, including child abuse, firearms and narcotics, on 1st November 2019 had the Appellant violently evicted from the largest welsh prison with his arms viciously manicalled behind his back. 5. And for what purpose? It was for interested parties, in current Cardiff litigation, to obtain an unfair advantage by the seizure of all his legal papers and not even his clothes returned to the rightful owner. 5. The South Wales Police not only unlawfully controls HMP Parc by using both extreme and unusual bullying it has ensured nothing is done about its breach of Article 2 etc and theft of Appellant’s property. 6. Despite written complaints to both Avon and Somerset or Devon and Cornwall constabularies, to even recover his legal papers for this case, he is ignored. 7. Behind this travesty of justice is their notorious 10 year ongoing 1CF03361 police machine-gun conspiracy case (T20097445). This originated from the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, to save her pension, having ordered the unblocking of the barrel of an alleged WW1 Lewis machine gun previously in alleged Appellant’s possession. 8. Not only did the welsh police ignore the advice from other police forces in England but also RAF and Farnborough Air Show previous scrutineers all confirming it was NOT a firearm and so, in desperation, even painted the film prop from film ‘Gunbus’ a different colour in the hope of fooling the jury!
South Wales Police fabricated criminal allegations including ‘Child Abuse, Firearms (Trading in Machine Guns) Narcotics, ABH and FTA (failing to attend courts) etc
I am grateful for your seeing me concerning the police denying my Taunton GP my medical records.
My recent blog extract, below, on the decades of suffering under ‘South Wales Police Corruption’, affecting so many, points to proof of rampant criminal conduct when accountable to no one:
dav
Re-elected Taunton MP, Rebecca Pow, inadvertently caused my imprisonment in March 2019 for seven more months and only released due to the fortunate intervention by a clearly irate HM Parole Board member from London that had been lied to for two hours with my sister witnessing it all.
The Chief Constable of South Wales Police had not only allowed the fabrication of seriously damaging criminal convictions, to cause me hell in his police controlled Parc, Bridgend prison but had also ensured the list included ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘ABH’, FTA and ‘narcotics’! Police convinced my parole officer that I had sent to Stoke St Mary village, Taunton, possibly deadly anthrax spores in a prison cell letter causing it to have the village cordoned off from the public!
Would this ongoing conspiracy have anything to do with the then Barbara Wilding’s emergency 2009 MAPPA level 3 Category 3 ‘Operation Chalice’ meeting in Barry police station on the 8th of June in order to register me amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the UK in order I may be shot?
When an armed police helicopter, with 20 odd officers, had raided our house in St Donats, while we were enjoying afternoon tea in the garden with the springer spaniels, why was I then NOT arrested?
Was this to do with my being set up to be ‘shot’ (see leaked MAPPA category 3 memos) or their failed attempt (Operation Dandelion) in snatching our 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to forced council care? It was to try and stop my civil claims, BS614159 etc, following the police’s 50 failed malicious prosecutions often denying me liberty during those decades of deliberate persecution.
South Wales Police Corruption ‘Ups a Notch’
I am arrested at my Cardiff veterinary surgery for theft of my own motor bike and gaoled in Cardiff prison for 4 days.
Poloice concoct charges of being in possession og a ‘garrotte type instrument in the pannier (embriotomy wire used on cattle dehorning on HRH Prince Charles farm and from ‘assaulting PC Philips who had thought I was possibly an escaped psychiatric patient.
This wicked police interview was deliberately withheld from all my civl proceeding for compensation with the final presiding judge refusing disclosure of any of the substantivre trial court records as they covered over 50 failed malicious criminal prosecutions. This tape was leaked revealing the level of SWP routinde corruption for which they are k nown world wide.
Would it have had anything to do with the police then transporting my decommissioned WW1 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun 2000 miles around the UK, contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act, had they not, first, unblocked the gun barrel and having her painted a different colour to fool the jury to secure a mandatory 10 year prison term for ‘trading in machine guns’?
Who out there on cyber space would like a copy of the official machine gun trial transcript for a view on the trial judge , PAUL THOMAS QC, to see how internal ‘taffy politics’ command my destiny?
[South Wales Police ref 1900195556 ‘alleged Heroin sent to Alun Cairns MP’] [I900180883 ‘alleged anthrax spores to Rebecca Pow MP]. To whom do I complain?
Police repaint gun to try and fool 2010 machine-gun jury but not before frantically driving the antique almost 2000 miles around the UK, often with only one or two unarmed police in the vehicle , contrary to regulations because the Chief Constable had bloody well known from the start, the gun was recorded in aircraft CAA log books as decommissioned and proved , before trial by the new owner.
2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun
Last time, in February 2016, His Lordship had asked me to leave the public gallery and address both he and his colleague, Mr Justice Sweeney, over my application following Mrs Kirk having been banned from ‘note taking’ on my behalf by the South Wales judge, HHJ Crowther.
Welsh courts invariably hold me behind bullet proof glass to protect me BUT primarily to make sure I hear as little as possible in the hope their blackmail may lead to my confiding in my defence information to one of their lawyers
Their Lordships bluntly quashed this one of manywicked practices carried out in the Welsh courts with gay abandon.
Will Their Lordships come to my rescue again , we all wonder, over the police’s attempt to having me shot on Barbara Wilding’s door step as one of the top most dangerous individuals in the UK?
Extract of email to my 112th law firm asked to protect me from incessant South Wales Police bullying
Can you please confirm you are still acting for me in the case AND ATTENDING WITH QC I briefed in London with a witness?
I now have new information for the judge, HHJ Tracy Lloyd-Clarke for the lawyer, from a fortunate civil hearing only yesterday, 1CF03361 (machine-gun/murder conspiracy), that should lead to the release, at last, of police MAPPA and MACHINE GUN CONSPIRACY RECORDS TO GET MY POLICE PSYCHIATRIC REPORTS FABRICATED.
HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC also helped stop my civil claims, following their 33 failed malicious prosecutions aimed at me. Now,this week ,this machine gun judge refused to order specific disclose just as in the first 33 failed prosecutions or the wrong people would go to prison.
The police QC was made to admit to HH judge Keiser that HH judge Seys LLEWELLYN QC refused to release those MAPPA minutes even when they had been delivered to court in the proverbial ‘brown envelope’ in front of me containing their plan to having me killed.
South Wales Police were now ordered to disclose HH Judge Thomlow’s documentary evidence as well that he had used at secret HH judge Bidder QC hearing in Cardiff Crown Court to have me sectioned to Ashworth for rest of my life.
Their yet to be disclosed forensic history of me contained their Caswell clinic I had diagnosed, with PROF RODGER WOOD OF Swansea university lying, that I had a brain tumour making me so dangerous….MAPPA LEVEL 3 CATEGORY 3 (top 5% most dangerous) … I must not be told…….and never have been since.
Police, this very week, were made to allow my box of records, created from my near eight months in Cardiff prison during the scandalous 2010 trading in machine-guns trial fiasco, suddenly to appear after about 5 years of apparently missing
Remember , HH Judge Seys Llewellyn QC had quickly ordered the destruction of my BS 614159 etc court records, to block a RCJ appeal, relating to my first of many substantive claims for over two million pounds, after he had refused need for both standard and specific disclosure arising from over 40 police incidents.
I had dutifully released 50 odd arch lever files for BS case and they produced not one of relevance and I am now expected me to release my intricate 2009 collated prison records of their daily criminal conduct.
Now, am I morally obliged to accommodate all these delightful people with disclosure they already have and appear to have gravitated to Cardiff’s so called law courts, civil and criminal?
The lying little bastards, in 2014, again told the court there were no bail hostels available, a habit of theirs to keep me in prison, just as they did this time , for next week’s court, ‘cannot find a welsh forensic psychiatrist to assess your fitness’.…. as South Wales medics are all too bloody scared to counter any other South Wales doctor as it is NHS (Wales) controlled and NOT NHS (England).
My sister, Celia and another, quietly made their own enquiries as to bail hostel availability, that January in 2014 both to be told there were plenty.
AND SO TO FRANCE,
. “I am just going outside and may be some time.”
Let us, before boarding, start considering HHJ Tracy Lloyd -Clarke’s Cardiff Crown Court’s hearing this week on Thursday or Friday, I forget which for the moment.
How police can withhold the truth, for eight years, surrounding my machine-gun incarceration now set up in both my T20170239 criminal & 1CF03361 civil cases to maximise world publicity of accepted routine deceit and corruption in the welsh law courts, alas, still part of the United Kingdom
extract from 2009 court transcript:
“My mistake” lying Thomlow mutters.
Lying welsh judge, Richard Thomlow, in my forced absence in cells below, informed the July 2009 court that both the seller and purchaser of my Lewis machine-gun were known to the police more than 6 months before my trial but kept me locked up to cause maximum disruption in my civil proceedings against them for their losing the first 33 malicious prosecutions, at that time, aimed against me.
As nine of the jury commented after acquittal , “Why were they not both also in the dock with Mr Kirk?”
Answer, because the court was presided over yet another corrupt welsh judge , Paul Thomas.
When I am in France phone me on whatsapp 07708586202
I again invite feedback from the general public, especially from others that have suffered under South Wales injustice. I have already received on phone, emails and comments on my regular blogs depicting the sheer scale of South Wales Police’s malicious criminal conduct to pervert the course of justice .
Oh what fun…my appeal is being blocked, it would appear.
The subtle difference between my knowledge and the learned judge’s assumption, is that I have found over near 30 years of my life in that hell hole Wales of court deceit, is that I have now been accused by a judge of lying, I sold a film prop for film , Gunbus, when knowing the replica 1916 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun was a prohibited weapon!
There is the logic in that?
I will start with HHJ Petts 15th September 2021 judgment in my long running 1CF03361 civil claim:
1. Has DL received a written reply, he promised me from Litts, gunsmiths of Newport, that ‘no work’ was done on dummy gun after trial before posting it on to Birmingham Proof House for what?
2. Para 34? By judge Petts was DISHONESTLY written when knowing it was all proven as Respondent’s pack of lies by QC (Quaintly Corrupted) and the South Wales Police from unlawfully late witness statements and civil claim cross examination evidence …. You were there in court so please confirm for an outside Police force and Bar Council?
3. Can you confirm DL, in your presence, telephoned Litts who stated they did no work on ‘dummy gun’ nor were allowed to?
4. The police had sent the ‘dummy gun’ to ‘Chepstow’ (Litts?) as the criminal jury had picked up early on, as eight of them confirmed in the pub after my acquittal, as an obvious deliberate smoke screen. 5. RAF experts and others, never disclosed in trial or to me, had already voiced opinion that the prosecution exhibit was a dummy WW1 Lewis machine-gun that ‘looked like a dummy’, ‘worked like a dummy’ and ‘quacked like a dummy’ for instruction or for educational purposes only but never a ‘ prohibited weapon’!
4. Can you confirm DL, as instructed, wrote asking for Birmingham Proof House evidence and had a reply that ‘no work’ was needed to decommission the dummy gun as it was, at most, a 0.410 single shot shotgun with a condemned smooth bore barrel too wide for 0.303 machine-gun rounds?
i5. AND most important of all, where is the evidence this deceitful judge Petts relied upon stating in his judgment, drafted before trial, that I was the liar?
MY CAR BEING SEARCHED FOR MACHINE GUNS AT POLICE HQ ON VERY DAY GOLD GROUP AND DOLMANS SOLICITORS WHER2 HAVING ONE OF THEIR UNLAWFUL WEEKLY MEETINGS CONSPIRING TO JUSTYING MY BEING MAPPA 3/3 SHOT ON THE 21ST JUNE 2009 PLANNED POLICE HELICDOPTER RAID WITH 20 OD TO D COPPERS SURROUNDING OUR HOUSE TO SNATCH INTO CARE OUR THEN 10 YEAR OLD GENEVIEVE
????
RoguesGallery must include police blackmailed Caswell Clinic mentally ill, diagnosed and NHS sacked, police psychiatrist who, without my being allowed even attendance to Cardiff ‘s secret Crown Court, as not legally represented, told the 2nd Dec 2009 judge Bidder QC I was so ill, with possible cancer causing significant brain damage, I needed locking away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.
So, why was I made to stand trial?
Celia, Judge Keazer, above, with Petts denied me either the seller or buyer of the AJR1 prosecution exhibit (alleged prohibited weapon) AT CIVIL TRIAL, the eight jury, remember, almost split their sides over in laughter. In the jury 2010 criminal trial they asked why was not Mr Gerry Cooper and David Woodford not both in the dock along side me, as ‘being in possession’?
Real Enid Blyton stuff Mum used to read to us so long ago.
A proverbial usual ‘can of worms’?
The level of deceit in the welsh judiciary with no central government intervention points me to leaving the UK as Norman Scarth did, for good as it is not safe as another cooked-up prison term will deny me my medication again.
INTERIM ARTICLE for those following the wickedness of some in the South Wales Police now moving to the London law courts
. The MUSA article is to warn others our judiciaryis not as it hopes to appear to be — I invite you to follow my route throughout the RCJ and European courts, over the next 5 years, all due to ‘devil worship’ rituals in Cardiff s law courts as it must always take precedent to the’ rule of law’ and the truth.
GOING BACK IN TIME [2011]: Fwd: MUSA BIG FILE Fw: FAO PAUL GARLICK QC
ExternalInbox
butlincat
25 Sept 2021, 20:01 (12 hours ago)
to me, Terence, Hope
look what i found: from 2011:- hunger strike in HMP by someone called “Maurice Kirk”, Highbury Corner court, …and more victimisation and corruption. ps the QC wrote to didn’t reply. Typical. Nobbled probably.
I am writing hoping you can help as the situation since you parted from the case has dwindled down to a completely unacceptable position with the Musas now imprisoned since 31 Oct., having lost now 6 children on totally bogus allegations. During the week beginning the 31 Oct. a 6 day hearing effectively removed the baby, the 6th child, on evidence given to the court that can only be described as utter perversions of justice and lies. Injunctions forbid me as Mckenzie friend from relating the lies told to get the baby removed from the Musa parents.
I am am asking if you can please reinstate yourself into the case again to assist the Musas in their time of peril. They have never had adequate representation from the numerous solicitors and connected theyve previously had and even they are expressing their request for help in their letters from prison to supporters. So many from the legal profession are loathe to help them because of the actions Haringey council take upon these people trying to represent Musa, such that they are frightened off via various methods. Musa can elaborate more on this part of it and id rather he did.
One aspect of this case that is hardly ever mentioned is the appalling witness intimidation targetted at the Musas witnesses. I do not joke or hoax when i say i have met and spoken to at least 5 witnesses who have been strongly affected by Haringey council because of their supporting the Musas. Please take the time to read the affadavit of Kay Young {below}, who had to flee the UK because of this dubious councils social workers intended actions towards her. Another witness had to spend 4 months in an illegal alien detention centre on totally bogus evidence. Other witnesses, single mothers, have had their children removed, or had it threatened. All this is absolutely true.
If you can help the Musa family please could you let me know and I can take the appropriate steps to try and get the ball rolling. The Musas have a commital to crown court hearing on the 28th Dec. at Highbury Corner magistrates court. My site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com tells of their story recently, with supporter Maurice Kirk actually going on hunger strike in Cardiff prison as part of his protest as to what has/is happening to the Musas. My site explains also the disappearance of Favour Musa, and her being sexually abused whilst in care. The letters i sent to the chief constable {attd.} + police, MPs + other “authority figures” about this matter has never received a satisfactory response or even a reply in the Chief Con’s case. It seems sexual abuse on a minor is allowable by the police, MPs + others written to too. It is appalling. Letters were sent to Theresa May and others by recorded delivery royal mail too about this abuse but still no reply has ever been recived. I have sent hundreds of emails to MPs + similar, as others have, to meet with a stony silence and no response whatsoever. I think it is quite apparent to some supporters who have investigeted this child seizing in the UK via mothers who have had children removed by councils {Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek,Eve Pears, + many more} that a child seizing network is in place which could very well cater for a paedophile network, either here or abroad.
Incidentally Maurice Kirk – pls see his site www.kirkflyingvet.com – was arrested again on totally trumped up charges after giving evidence for the Musas at the bail app. hearing on Thursday 22 Dec., although the 2 events are only indirectly connected, Maurice having an injunction upon him to never communicate with the Musas. The police know what Maurice is capable of as his 20 year battle with the corrupt elements within the S Wales authorities show, and they will silence him at all costs. As i said he just spent 68 days on hunger strike in Cardiff prison before being released a couple of weeks ago. Whilst in Cardiff prison he was beaten badly by the prison officers, and the attempts to section him, a common ploy placed upon him in the past, was luckily unsuccessful. His many phone calls describing his treatment etc are on my wordpress site mentioned.
Please help if you can.
Thanks for your time and happy solstice. J. Graham. ——————————————————————- Affadavit from Kay Young: STATEMENT FROM Kay Young 26 5 11 Witness “A” statement: Subject: RE: paedophiles Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:18:10 +0100 I first became aware of this family’s plight when I received an e-mail asking me if I could assist the family. I made contact with Bishop Gloria – who – understandably – did not trust anyone. I then met her on 24 November in London (St Marks Hospita) after I had attended a Hospital appointment. This was the first time I spoke to her Social Worker, JOYCE AGYEKUM, who appeared to not understand Bishop Gloria (I had no problems understanding Gloria). I took the mobile from Bishop Gloira and started to talk to Ms Agyekum as I felt there were difficulties regarding ‘Contact arrangements between Bishop Gloria and the children’. I introduced myself as ‘Kay’ on the telephone to her (Ms Agyekum) and reminded her in accordance with the Children Act 1989 the LBH (London Borough of Harringey) had a duty to promote contact in the ‘best interests of the child/ren’. Ms Agyekum hung up on me. Bishop Gloria came to my home, with her husband a few days later (on a Saturday); I felt because she did not trust me, she may start to if she were to come to my home for the evening with her husband. As a decent human being I could not allow to see a decent, innocent, law-abiding family have their children taken away and that was the reason I decided to (try) and help them. The reason for this was because in 1994, I had my daughter taken into the care of HERTFORDSHIRE SOCIAL SERVICES, whereby they committed FRAUD, NON-FEASANCE, MALFEASANCE, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, MISREPRESENTATION, PERJURY… all of which I intend to put before the Court of Human Rights. I did not want to see this family suffer as I had and have for many years. All I had asked for was help for my child who I suspected had been sexually abused by her father, who, incidentally is ALSO one of the people who ABUSED ME when I was younger and whom the POLICE now (2011) REFUSE to take up my case for ‘historic abuse’ – telling me it is ‘out-of-date’, which is a LIE! I knew when I became involved with the family more that MY OWN family were being put at risk, as there are many families within Harringey who have either had their children taken into care (I know of only one who has had the child returned), or been threatened to have a child/ren taken into care, been moved away from the family out of the area and/or ‘disappeared’. I have had to move away from the UK to protect my own child. I have (attempted) to submit an Urgent Judicial Review application against JUDGE GLENN BRASSE’s decision 1) not to investigate allegations of sexual abuse of one of the children from this family and b) Ignoring Three EPO’s I have applied for and one which I applied for in St Albans (Hertfordshire, UK) Courts. I have experiences, first hand, the arrogance of Joyce Agyekum, who obviously believes she is above the law (she committed purjery in Court,e FEBRUARY 2011 – which can be proven).
I would like to add my comments also. JUDGE GLENN BRASSE acknowledged in February that ALL the ‘original’ allegations against the family WERE FALSE and is set on record (at least it should be on record at the Court House) that “Social Services in Harringey can make whatever claims they want to, regardless of whether or not they are found to be true or false”. He has also IGNORED a number of EPO’s (Emergency Protection Orders, in accordance with the Children Act 1989) which I have submitted, and at one time physically handed to an Usher at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch Court, London. I am now attempting to submit an URGENT JUDICIAL REVIEW, but am having difficulties and NO ONE seems to know where I should be submitting the form and if they do, I do NOT have an e-mail address where to send it. If you can help, please provide me with the e-mail where I send it. I have also made it clear and will state here, I DO suspect in submitting the Judicial Review application, that my life, AND anyone close to me (friend AND/OR family) MAY be at serious risk of harm by ANY AUTHORITIES / Organisations / Public Body/ies. I have already had an allegation made by the UK Social Services to the Irish Social Services Department for concern about my mental health. There is much more to what has and IS happening to me at the moment for helping this family – in short: I have lost everything. The ‘apparent’ Social Worker who came to see me called herself ‘Runya Mupfambati’ – I found out later she was NOT AUTHORISED to work with Hertfordshire County Coucil Social Services Department because she was registered as working in LONDON – I suspect a direct link to Harringey somewhere. Joyce Agyekum is REGISTERED as working in HERTFORDSHIRE, but it seems – is still involved with the family in question. Runya – is actually Runyararo Editor Mupfambati (as I have been informed by the GSCC – General Social Care Council) I have been informed by the GSCC the following: 1. ALL Social Workers have to be registered with the GSCC to call themself a ‘Social Worker’. 2. The name on their badge/s has TO BE THE SAME as the name they are registered under. 3. They have to register under the AREA / Authority, they work for – if they don’t they have no authority working in that particular area/ Location / Town / Borough etc., Surely, Judge Brasse would have known this? As he was not allowing Mr Musa and Bishop Gloria at one time to be given legal advice (unless it was by Solicitors he suggested) on the grounds that ‘they would not be registered and answerable if not registered’. Gloria Musa (the mother of the Children) has been featured many times in The Telegraph by Christopher Booker. When I first got involved with this family / befriended them, I was sent alot of ‘anonymous’ e-mails; that is I did not know how whoever sent them to me, got my e-mail address (land e-mail address). She is not a Prostitute – someone who originally reported it to SOCIAL SERVICES (and works for a CHARITY CALLED CARIS, in Harringey) has stated in the Court proceedings in February that it was “only a joke”, or something very similar to those words. Former Eastenders Actress – Michelle Collins – has also played a major part in the case because she has also given false representation / evidence and in February also stated she did not mean it to be ‘nasty’, as it was all meant as a ‘joke’. This family are NOT UK Nationals. I was due to submit a Statement before the Court on Friday, 25th February 2011 and give evidence on the Monday 28th February. Unfortunately, the person was an advocate for the family had been ‘discharged from Court’ and I knew – at some stage I would be put directly in the firing line for assisting this family. What I mean by ‘firing line’ is this: earlier in February, I had given my FULL NAME (I had told them my name was either ‘Kay’ or ‘Ms Young’ before. I had also complained about the local Police Force (as mentioned herein) with regard to them taking up an Historic abuse case. I also had ‘problems with being bullied at my sons school, and had complained; on 18th February I realised Social Services may come back to my home at some stage should the School contact them – which the school did. Judge Glenn Brasse suggested to the Mother that she submit a complaint. Myself and Bishop Gloria Musa went along to HARRINGEY SOCIAL SERVICES to do so and were obstructed to submit a complaint by the staff there on duty. The duty staff were Ms JUNE McKENZIE (Manager of Children and Families) and Ms TRACEY DAVIES, (Social Worker – Children and Families) for Harringey Social Services – Ms McKenzie took Ms Davies OUT of the room at one point to (in Ms McKenzies words ‘diffuse the situation’ – as at one point, Ms Davies looked like she was going ‘to go’ for me – in other words, looked like she may get up and physically assault me). THIS conversation CAN BE PROVED…. As I understood, Judge Brasse had requested the children we re-united with the family (21 February), but by the end of the week he had changed his mind for some apparent reason (not known to me). He even asked Joyce Agyekum a time scale the children could be re-united with their family – she requested (I believe) 2012, to which he had stated it was ‘not good enough’ and he requested a shorter time-scale. A large number of Social Workers / POLICE (to name but a few Annie Walker – Mngr Ch and F, Maria Foster – Mngr, Ch and F, Joyce Agyekum – Social Worker (SW), Alexandra Constantinou (SW), Rositta Moise, Solicitor (London Borough of Haringey’s Solicitor – who incidentally was NOT on the Law Society’s register). POLICE within Harringey who have been /ARE involved with the family: Sargeant KADIRI, PC Christie, PC Caswell, DC Nagra and DS Cara Barton – I have no doubt there would be more. I spoke to someone called MOJI Word twice on her mobile phone in December 2010 – she was ‘running for Presidency’. She thanked me for helping the family as she IS A personal friend. She also stated that the Police within Harringey dropped the case against Mr Musa and Bishop Gloria after she had spoken to them (she spoke to the Police in Harringey). I have also submitted a complaint to the ‘Office for Judicial Complaints’ who – at one time, informed me the Judge in question had RETIRED! I found his name on the list of ‘Circuit Judges’ and corrected them…. Given Mr Hales works in such an office, he should be aware of who is and is not still a Judge!! The LITTLE GIRL, aged 10 years old, is BEING SEXUALLY ABUSED in care and NO ONE seems to want to do anything to help her (that is if she is still alive as she has not been seen for a number of MONTHS and NO ONE is granted either telephone contact with her or any other form of contact. After the (referred to as ‘F’ for now) 10 year old, had told her mothre at a CONTACT SESSION that she had been abused by the FOSTER PARENTS SON, I submitted the first EPO. I have attempted to submit another EPO yesterday, Wednesday, but because of where I am at the moment, I have limited time to search for the relevant e-mail address. I am having to rely on a library PC at the moment and the ‘good will’ of the staff here, which I have to say, has been excellent – after I explained to them what I have been doing and about the injustice of the case. I STILL HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS FOR THE WELL-BEING of the 10 year old little girl If ANYONE would like any further information, please feel free to contact me at this e-mail address; I am unable to give a land e-mail address as since I have been in IRELAND, my benefits from the UK have been and ARE seriously being interferred with by ‘authorities’ and I am therefore, not getting any money at the moment. I have been living off CHURCH FOOD VOUCHERS given by the Church here and have had one ‘back-dated’ payment which has paid the rent and enabled me to buy my young child a new, decent pair of shoes. Given the nature of this case and as I am living in Ireland, I am also copying Ming Flanagan, who is the current Mayor of County Roscommon. The Judiciary in the UK is corrupt and I will be submitting my own (past) case with evidence to the European Courts of Human Rights – rather than use the procedures for the UK Judicial system. PLEASE HELP EXPOSE the corruption within the UK Judiciary that this family have had to experience. I trust this clarifies some of the details about the family. I AM NOT AND HAVE NEVER had any ‘Orders’ against me NOT to speak about the case AND INFORMATION shared within this e-mail has been divulged to me by various sources. Yours sincerely B.A & B.Sc (Hons) OPEN I am also copying, for information only, to Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP, who was my Local MP when I lived in the UK, as I have kept him informed regarding the case, since October 2010. Copy also sent to Mr Paul Randle-Jolliffe who was the Advocate representing the family in February and who was extradited from Court – as referred to above. CC: includes Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP – For information only Sam Hallimond – for Information only Ming Flanagan – current Mayor of County Roscommon,, Ireland PLEASE NOTE: ALL CLAIMS MADE WITHIN THIS E-MAIL CAN BE PROVEN… There is tape-recorded evidence to substantiate ALL allegations made. If there is any part of this you – anyone – would like clarification of, please do not hesitate to contact me
——————————————————————————————– 6, 7, 9 sept letters to prin reg holborn To whom it may concern,
Having called the Principle Registry this afternoon Friday 9 Sept. 2011 on phone numbers 020 79477939 at 16.31 BST, my call was hung up without notice, followed by a further call to number 02079476020 at the same address at 16.39 when i was hung up upon again, I finally rang 02079 477922 at again the same addressed to be told that there was no one there to take my call. During the first call a young lady there told me that London councils can renew Interim Care Orders by phone, which was going to be the subject of my phone call had I been able to speak with anyone. I duly pointed out I had put in my emails the law which states otherwise – that ICO’s were not allowed to be issued if the parents had objected and were not present at the court hearing – as was the case when the MUSA parents were not present in the court when this ICO was issued on the 5 Sept. 2011, and the said ICO was therefore null and void that was supposedly “issued” by judge Hess, the notification received by the MUSA family by judge BERRY IN THE LATE AFTERNOON, AS MY RESUME DESCRIBES BELOW IN THE EMAILS UNANSWERED BY YOURSELVES.
I am concerned at the lady on the phone saying that ICOs are issued FOR LONDON COUNCILS IF THE PARENTS CONCERNED ARENT PRESENT, and although she claimed to be an “admin clerk”, this indeed is a serious statement of how this court works. I have solid evidence to prove this was said and what ive described occurred in its entirety.
Dear Sir / Madam, Further to my email dated 6 9 11 below can you please tell me exactly what action you intend to take about: a} the illegalities involved – the ICO being issued contrary to the standard guidelines set within British law, b} the children now removed under a null and void order – are they to be returned as no legal ICO is in place as is their right? and c} what is to be done about the persons who partook in the actions of issuing a meaningless and irregular Interim Care Order, in respect of those persons not acting responsibly and allowing such an ICO to be issued? I may add this is the 4th time such an ICO has been issued, without the objecting parents being at the hearing which is their right according to British law. This case – no. FD10C00195 – is not only causing a lot of unnecessary distress to the parents and more than likely their children since the irregularities began on the 8 April 2010, brought about by government employees who seem set on working outside the law, but is also wasting a huge amount of taxpayers money in the process. No wonder there are silencing orders in place whereby the misdeeds and crimes that have been committed are kept from public scrutiny. It is an outright disgrace that things are allowed to continue by those put in office that are supposed to monitor and stop and correct such irregularities and crimes.
MUSA FAMILY ANDTHE ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF THEIR 5 CHILDREN Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:22:03 +0100
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,
CASE NO FD10C00195 – THE MUSA FAMILY AND THEIR 5 CHILDREN.
Concerning an Interim Care Order issued yesterday 5 September 2011 regarding the 5 children belonging to the MUSA parents GLORIA and CHIWAR MUSA at the Principle Registry of the Family Division, Holborn, London this is an official complaint regarding the proceedings involving judge HESS, judge BERRY and all others concerned whereby an Interim Care Order was issued outside of British law at the above court. It is understood JUDGE BERRY informed the MUSA parents GLORIA and CHIWAR MUSA of an ICO being issued via a telephone conversation between HARINGEY COUNCIL and a certain JUDGE HESS. Seeing as the MUSA parents objects to this ICO being issued, and had notified the correct people of their objections, for this ICO to be issued in their absence renders the said ICO null and void.
MAY I POINT OUT BRITISH LAW, IN THAT IT IS ILLEGAL TO ISSUE AN ICO IF THE PARENTS HAVE OBJECTED AND ARE NOT IN THE COURT FOR THE ISSUANCE HEARING. THE PARENTS HAD OBJECTED AND THESE CHARACTERS HARINGEY COUNCIL, JUDGE HESS, AND JUDGE BERRY HAVE PERVERTED THE COURSE OF TRUE JUSTICE BY ISSUING THE ORDER AND MUST BE HELD RESPONSIBLE. THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME AN ICO HAS BEEN ISSUED ILLEGALLY REGARDING THE MUSA CHILDREN, THE PARENTS NOT BEING PRESENT, HAVING OFFICIALLY RAISED OBJECTIONS AND FOLLOWING THE CORRECT PROCEDURE FOR SUCH OBJECTIONS. THE PARENTS HAD BEEN AT THER COURT READY FOR THE HEARING WITH RELAVENT DOCUMENTS AT THE OPENING OF THE PREMISES IN THE MORNING ONLY TO BE TOLD JUST BEFORE IT CLOSED OF THIS ICO BEING ISSUED CONTRARY TO BRITISH LAW. IT IS DISGRACEFUL THAT THESE JUDGES, SUPPOSEDLY KNOWING THE LAW GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE OF THE SAID INTERIM CARE ORDERS COULD ACT IN THIS WAY, THE LAWS GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE BEING:
Rule 28 of the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 SI 1991/1395 which provides;
“A justice’s clerk or single justice shall not make an order under section 11(3) or section 38(1) unless – (a) A written request for such an order has been made to which the other parties and children’s guardian consent and which they or their representatives have signed; (b) A previous such order has been made in the same proceedings; and (c) The terms of the order sought are the same as those of the last such order made.”
The parents have consistently stated in writing that they do not agree to the orders being renewed which means postal renewal cannot lawfully happen, there must be a hearing whether the parents attend or not
This is stated clearly in Neutral Citation no. (2002) NIFam 11 Ref: GILC3695 IN THE MATTER OF SM (INTERIM CARE ORDERS: EXERCISE OF JUDGE’S DISCRETION)
Frankly I am not absolutely certain what the phrase `willbe renewed administratively by Court Office until date of review hearing’means. It was clear that counsel in this case were also somewhat unclear. It may be helpful if I set out at this stage some comments on the renewal of Interim Care Orders;
1. When an Interim Care Order is made it is normally necessary for the making of further Interim Care Orders to be considered on at least one occasion before the finalhearing. I am given to believe that there may be a variety of local practices for dealing with such cases and while it is not intended to encourage courts to depart unnecessarily from well-established local arrangements(particularly those which approximate closely to what I recommend below), some guidance may be helpful to ensure a degree of uniformity. Although the makingof further Interim Care Orders is described as “renewal”, it must be rememberedthat the proper form of order is that the whole application is adjourned to the next date for further consideration.
2. A courtmay not renew an Interim Care Order as a matter of course and without reconsideration. At the expiration of every Interim Care Order, the granting of every further Interim Care Order must be considered independentlyon its merits. It can never be right for a court granting an Interim Care Order at one sitting to attempt to lay down a policy which might fetter the discretion of any future sitting in regard to the grant or refusal of a further Interim Care Order – see Re P(Minors) (Interim Order) [1993]2 FLR 742.
3. It is,therefore, necessary for the court to make a judgment regarding renewal in eachoccasion and the court should treat each further hearing as an opportunity to monitor the progress of the application. This does not mean however that all parties should be required to attend a hearing on each occasion. The court is perfectly entitled to deal with the matter on the basis of the attendance of the applicant only provided that written consents of the other parties are produced and no party objects. Provision can therefore be made at the first direction hearing for further Interim Care Orders to made without the need for the personal attendance of all the parties. 4. In the Family Care Centres where the Trust, who normally would be the applicant, produces consents from all the parties, confirms that directions have been complied with and the court considers that it might be unduly onerous to require the personal attendance of his representative eg due to the distance to be travelled or for some other good reason, then I can see no reason inprinciple why the court should not permit the applicant Trust in those circumstances to make a written application for renewal. In such an instance, the responsibility would rest with the applicant to ensure that a written application was acceptable to the court, that all the consents were in order, and that all parties concerned were satisfied that the papers would reach the court file in time for the hearing. That application must however be considered by the appropriate judicial officer. Such aprocedure would be similar to the well-established practice of hearings on the papers presently carried on for example in the Court of Protection and beforemasters in the High Court.
I HEREBY ASK THAT THIS MATTER RECEIVES THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES BY THE POLICE AND OTHER REGULATORY BODIES WHO WILL BE INFORMED IMMEDIATLY OF THIS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE, AND THE PERSONS ACTING OUTSIDE THE LAW BE BROUGHT TO BOOK, AND THE CHILDREN THIS FALSE ICO ISSUED WAS REGARDING BE RETURNED AT ONCETO THEIR RIGHTFUL PARENTS, THE CHILDREN BEING REMOVED FROM THOSE PARENTS BY ILLEGAL MEANS ANYWAY, viz. FALSE EVIDENCE AND ALLEGATIONS BY EMPLOYEES OF HARINGEY COUNCIL. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THESE VISITORS TO THIS COUNTRY – THE MANY CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THEM BY HARINGEY COUNCIL AND PERSONS CONNECTED TO THEM IN THE REMOVAL OF THEIR 6 CHILDREN, SUCH AS THE ACTIONS OF THE GUARDIAN SOLICITOR ABOUT WHOM I HAVE ISSUED OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY IGNORED IS AN OUTRIGHT DISGRACE.
Dear Mr. Lammy, I understand you are the MP for the area in London in which the Nigerian Musa family are resident. Id like a meeting to see you immediatly, and I mean immediatly, about some very serious matters. I have written to you several times and have not received any reply, and quite frankly im appalled, not at your ignoring my communications, but the fact of what was in those communications, which told you of the many irregularities concerning the case of the Musa family having 5 children removed under very dubious circumstances. This pales into comparison with the fact that one of the children – the 9 year old girl Favour Musa – has not been seen for approx. 10 months since she reported being sexually molested – “inappropriatly touched” – whilst in the care provided by the local council. This is a very serious matter considering the girl has not been seen for 10 months by her parents, and neither have her brother or any of her sisters seen her either – and nobody is even told of her wellbeing or anything about her whatsoever – as I told you weeks ago by my ignored recorded delivery letter – which not only goes against the Childrens Charter the government is pushing, but also is against her and her parents Human Rights and also is against the orders the court made, and against the statutes for removed children in Britain also. What is happening is highly illegal but no authorities will face up to the situation. Why is this Mr. Lammy? Unbelievably this appalling situation has now got worse in that the contact visits have stopped completely for these parents and their children – the parents not having seen any of their children for 4 weeks or more now – this disgraceful situation is totally illegal again and against the court orders etc. as Ive already said. Im sure youll agree all that is happening here comes within the remit your responsibility as the local MP, but it seems you are doing nothing and refuse to do anything even though i have sent you communications by email and by recorded delivery outlining clearly and concisely the numerous illegalities happening weeks ago. Can you please tell me why? If you are wondering who i might be I will tell you I am a very concerned citizen and a friend of the family, have known them for some time, have stayed with them on numerous occasions and know very much the truths of this case. I have met many of this family’s friends who have been much affected by this case, {also having their relationships with their children interfered with by the same people},and I know other witnesses who I am in contact with constantly who have also been very much affected by things. I have been in contact with the police and the Chief Constable about this case,and many others. Reporters like Christopher Booker dont write articles for over a year on a case unless theres something very much to it {pls. see below}.
So as I said I would like a meeting with you as soon as possible to find out just why you are failing to do what you are paid to do – to represent these people when something such as they are suffering is happening. I can come to any venue you like to meet you, Parliament or anywhere, but I cannot stress the urgency of a meeting. I have sent you many emails and communications by recorded delivery as I have the MP Theresa May – kindly do not ignore this one. Thank you. This message is a true sworn statement. J Graham.
———————————————————————————————————————— “Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the Musa family torture at the hands of Haringey council: STILL NOTHING HAS BEEN HEARD ABOUT THIS MISSING GIRL AS OF 26 6 2011: SUNDAY 12 6 11: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker. ======================================
Dear Ms. Casey, Having seen you on the tv the other day in your role as Victim’s Commissioner my gut instinct told me that you seemed a very caring conscientious person and I knew at once I had to write to you to make you aware of something and ask for your assistance in a very serious matter. There has been no response AT ALL when trying to tell people in so-called “authority”of a certain case with its numerouis outrageous irregularities and crimes involving the removal of 5 children from their parents by certain parties within Haringey council, N. London. So it is with a heavy heart I have to tell you that many crimes have taken place by many people involved in the removal of these 5 children, and since the children were removed over a year ago things have got progressively worse until now things have become absolutely scandalous. Things have got so bad that the council can never ever afford to let the true facts and their involvement and actions over the past year become generally known, especially after the tragic and very sad cases of “Baby P” and Victoria Climbe where this council did indeed play a large part which led to these childrens lives being taken. There really is so much to relate but I will concentrate on certain articles that explain things as best as I can. What follows below is a} my message to the Chief Constable Mr. Martin Baker after my appeals for something being done were totally ignored by my local police. Suffice to say I have sent many emails {which I can show you at any time if required} to parties such as the Prime Minister, MPs, Lord Triesman,numerous child care agencies and other government bodies, public figures and other child support agencies trying to explain the situation. I have not received any replies, even from my letters by recorded delivery to Ms. Theresa May MP, the local MP to the Musas Mr. David Lammy and others.{ I have the postal receipts of these letters sent as proof}. Attatched are the articles of Mr. Christopher Booker, reporter, who has written approximately 11 artcles in the “Sunday Telegraph” over the last year. Restrictions now forbid him to report properly and openly on the case any more. A Judicial Review has been issued regarding the judge, which kept on being rejected time and time again, but whethewr anything becomes of that remains to be seen, and an E.P.O. has been sent which was also rejected many times, which is another matter. There are many more important details I cannot impart here, but suffice to say charges are in the pipeline to be issued over actions that have happened. I do ask sincerely for your help in this very serious matter Ms. Casey, because what is happening to these parents and especially the 5 children is a disgrace. Thank you for your time in reading my long diatribe and I hope so much you and your organisation can help these people as noone should ever have to go through what this family has.
Favour Musa also complained that she didnt like living in the home environment that she had been forced to accept that had been imposed upon her. She disliked the constant smoky atmosphere from presumably cigarettes but I raise the concern that massive numbers of 19 year olds in the UK smoke cannabis – marijuana – constantly, and I put it to anyone that this could easily be the situation here. Favour said that she would go upstairs at the property when the teenager had been smoking whatever and drinking cans of alcohol when he would play his guitar. It was on such an occasion it is understood the event of her being “inappropriatly touched” took place. Can you imagine the scenario? It is disgusting. A child of African culture is forced to live with a beer-swilling teenager in a cigarette or cannabis smoke ridden atmosphere and after a few cans of alcohol apparently tries his luck with sexual advances on the 9 YEAR OLD child? I find this outrageous and just as outrageous is the police and Chief Constable and numerous other figures ignoring not only the “touching” episode{s} but also the illegalities of the contact visits not taking place – it is against the orders the court made and it against both parties human rights and it is against the Childrens Act. Why wasnt anybody listened to by the council or police or indeed anywhere when these facts were put before them? When I tried to explain to the judge “Sir Mark Potter” about Favour’s situation at Mr. Musa’s appeal request hearing I was told to shut up and sit down on numerous occasions at the Royal Courts of Justice on Monday 16 May and he said I was interfering!!! This is ourrageous when a 9 year old girl is having to go through what Ive described and denied from seeing any of her family – none of her sisters or brother or parents have seen her at all, and each time the Musa parents ask of her welfare they are told nothing! Favour has been forced also to have a different Christian name by these council workers or somebody or other, that being “Lizzy”. Who gave themj the right to change her name? Was she asked? Did the parents have a say? Id bet everything I own she wasnt asked, and it seems to me to be part of subtle brainwashing tactics that can be used on a vulnerable innocent child – to change her name, and force her into a British culture of alcohol and cigarettes {or marijuana or crack being smoked?} along with the food that is totally alien to her. Is she being taken to church on a Sunday as she was used to doing when she was at home? I doubt it very much.{Her mother is a bishop in the African Evangelical church}. These characters whove done this and forced a child into a situation where shes molested should be prosecuted for aiding and abetting a crime and doing nothing about it when its reported to them!! This is why its so important that you please listen to whats happening Ms. Casey. Also there is evidence and proof of all I say, and also of her being bitten by the family dog!! Was the dog removed from the premises so it couldnt do it again? So much is kept quiet and it is feared, as I tried to tell the police and the CC, that she is indeed dead or has been taken abroad. Now the contact visits have ceased totally with all the children and the Musas havent seen their children for over 4 weeks – again against the orders of the court and against the so-called “Childrens Act” which is supposed to promote contact in situations like this, but the opposite is taking place. Thank you for your time Ms. Casey. Please help this family and do what is right. .Sincerely, J. Graham. This is a true sworn statement.
The email that I received sent to Mr. Musa was so serious I went to the police. The email is here:
“HELP ! FAVOUR MUSA AGE 10 IS BEING ABUSED BY A GANG OF PAEDOPHILES !
LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS 21 MEMSTEAD ROAD ,ERITH, KENT , DA8 3LA
Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Harringey Council to see or phone her;
Haringey Council have refused her aunts, uncles and,grandparents (9 family members in all) any contact with Favour even though they all came especially from Africa to see her ! She has 5 sisters and a brother ,and none of them have seen her for weeks !
Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION !
Favour needs YOUR HELP !! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER BECAUSE SHE DARED TO REPORT BEING ABUSED WHILE “IN CARE” !!
HARRINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P,and Victoria Climbé They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds !
We do not know if she is alive or dead !! PLEASE,PLEASE, find and contact Favour , she is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS !! ” **********************************************************************************
Please take heed of what is being done here Ms. Casey.
The attatchments to this email are: a} my letter to a foster care authority, with their reply – the only department to actually reply to any communication from me. b} a witness statement from witness Ms. Moji Word, e} communication from law advocate and former legal representative for the Musa’s Mr. Randle-Jolliffe about certain matters. f} Mr. C. Bookers “Sunday Telegraph” articles – full year. c} my letter to Lord Triesman, 14 5 11, no reply received. d} My F.O.I. request to Haringey council, subsequently refused. g} A witness statement from Kay Young who was targetted by the Haringey council as at least 5 other witnesses of the Musas have been, the result being Ms. Young fled the country thus keeping the child the council hade threatened to take, for no reason other than Ms. Young was a Musa witnress and knew everything that had happened to the family. She left behind a totally normal life, a home with all her belongings because of the harassment from the council who served a Section 47 on her, threatening to take her child for no reason whatsoever. Directly below is Ms. Musa’s affadavit, followed by my communications to the Chief Constable Mr. Baker after Dorset police refused to take my reporting seriously about a 9 year old girl being missing for 10 months after she had reported to her father on a contact visit that shed been “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested – by a 19 year old male in the foster family home. We have photos of this character and his mother. ——————————————————– This is a letter from Mrs. Gloria Musa to a well known MP. Mrs. Musa got no reply or help in any way, as I didnt after sending many emails and letters via recorded delivery to her at Parliament, as Mr. Lammy was sent too. .
————————————————-
“Subject: APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE WE HAVE NOT SEEN OUR DAUGHTER FOR 9 MONTHS Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 10:56:40 +0000
> > From: Gloria > > Subject: APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE > > To: mayt@parliament.uk > > Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 6:54 AM
Rt Hon Theresa May MP House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Tel: 020 7219 5206 Fax: 020 7219 1145 mayt@parliament.uk
Dear Rt. Honourable May,
APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE
My Name is Mrs Gloria Musa. I am an author and Minister of Religion. I am married to Mr Musa. We have six children. My husband and I arrived in the UK with visitors visas with two of our children and had the other four in the UK. We did not need to make any application as we do not wish to remain here. On 8 April 2010 Haringey children’s services claimed that a neighbour had found a letter in the front garden of our temporary address which they alleged that my eldest daughter had written and sent in the police who in turn took away our children on the basis that my husband and I are child traffickers, I am a sex worker who was having sex with strangers in front of my children, I suffer from epilepsy and had brain surgery, I was physically and sexually abused by my step father as a child and given opium by him, my husband and I have a history of fleeing from professionals whenever we came to their attention due to issues relating to the care of our children and are therefore likely to flee with our children, we neglected our children etc. The court granted an interim care order on the basis of these allegations and ordered a DNA on our children with a warning that my husband faced a long prison sentence if the allegations are correct. At this time I was pregnant for our sixth child. On June 2010 our sixth child was born. Following the sudden birth which occurred because I was distressed as a result of not being allowed to see my children in care on that date, we notified the Local authority in line with their request. Following the notification the Local authority sent about nine police men to the hospital who forcefully took away our daughter a few hours after she was born and I was badly manhandled and humiliated by the police. The Local authority then applied for the baby to be placed in care. I was not given any support but they tried to get me to retrospectively sign a document stating that i had authorised them to take the baby which i refused. My life has not been the same since then. The DNA report came out after a long delay in October and proved that my husband and I are the parents of our children. Police evidence shows that i am not known to the police in any capacity and therefore not a prostitute. I was not born in the UK and never had a step father. My parents are still happily married and had never lived in the UK. I had thought that the case would have ended and my children returned to me after the DNA result. I was wrong because the Local authority has rather intensified efforts to give up my children for adoption and long term care. They have instead changed their allegations relying on psychiatric reports prepared by a well known lying psychiatrist who is connected to them and an independent social services report. Although the lies are very obvious the judge has ignored all our please and has indicated that he has decided what to do though the hearing is listed for February 2010. Honourable please do not ignore our plea we have decided that we want to leave the UK with all our childre without any further delay. The Local Authority thinks that they can keep our children and we can go. We will not go without our children and would like you to please intervene. We are visitors here as foriegn nationals we need your help as our life is in danger here we need to return back with our children back to our famillies at home alive.we have writen to you twice last year and early this year please we plead for your urgent resp This is a very abridged version of our experience and we are happy to meet with you in order to get the permission to leave with our children as soon as possible. Our children are not British and we are not prepared to leave them behind. They have suffered greatly in care. We have not seen our eldest daughter for who the Local authority is brainwashing our coercing since the past NIne months. In addition to falsely accusing her of writing the letter which they claim was found in our front garden they are making her write letters claiming that she wants to stay in care until she is 18. They stopped her from seeing us after she asked for a journal. They perhaps believed that she would tell us more about her experiences in the journal. Before they stopped her from seeing us in contact, she had informed us that she was bitten by the carer’s dog and the carer’s 19 year old son was luring her into his upstairs room to touch her inappropriately and teach her how to smoke cigarettes. Although we brought this to the attention of the Local authority, they have failed to do anything but have rather continued to brain wash and coerce her. We worry for her future because if the same Local Authority which is supposed to be protecting her from abuse is happy to convince and compel her to agree that she wrote a letter which she did not write, then we are not sure what the future holds for children in England. They will probably grow up to believe that it is alright to lie. Please help us. We just want to leave here alive with our children as we gave birth to them is our duty and responsility to give them the best. We look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely Mrs Gloria Musa” ———————————————————————————- My message to a Chief Constable: “FAO CHIEF CONSTABLE BAKER?
12/05/2011
To lcjb@dorset.pnn.police.uk From: butlincat (butlincat75@googlemail.com) Sent: 12 May 2011 03:04:10 To: lcjb@dorset.pnn.police.uk Dear Mr. Baker, I am writing to you as Chief Constable as I have knowledge of serious crimes it is my duty as a British citizen to report them. I am having to report these crimes to you as my previous attampt at informing a certain department at Dorset police failed miserably, as the emails below show. I am told by characters in this department to inform the sender of the email I received which details some of the crimes I wish to tell you about that he must inform people I already said were working outside the law. This obviously has been ignored by the people at Dorset police I contacted and I am asking you to put matters right by seeing the law is enforced regarding the child Favour being sexually molested whilst in care. The basic facts are a 9 year old girl was removed by police along with others on the orders of Haringey council over a year ago. This girl – Favour Musa – then complained to her parents on a contact visit later that she had been molested by a character at the placement home. I have the details of the person concerned, including a photograph, and what supposedly happened after the event of molestation. Yesterday the 11 5 2011 I received the email below from Chiwar Musa, stating about a paedophile ring and the child Favour Musa. I then called Bournemouth police on 01202 220055 to report crimes and I asked for the child protection department, spoke to someone eventually though I know not from which department who gave me an email address to which i should sent the email i received. I duly did this and the correspondance between myself and the police is below in its entirety. I know from personal experience that when reporting a crime one does not have to go to the police force that is in the area where the crime one wished to report is, yet I am told this in these emails. I have reported crimes before on different occasions to a totally seperate police force area-wise to the crime{s} located area and it has received due process by the police, so I was amazed when I reported the serious crimes of a sexual nature on a minor I was fed this. This is unacceptable and I hereby report the crimes of sexual molestation to you as I have noone else to report it to. I cannot report it to Haringey police as I am told as I know of numerous instances where they have acted illegally whilst dealing with the Musa case of illegal child removal, and witness intimidation features highly on that list incidentally. This statement is truthful and I can relate many instances of that which I speak, including the serious witness intimidation connected to the Musa case of child removal who have been acted upon and intimidated by Haringey council. An application for an E.P.O. is attatched below concerning the child concerned {names redacted} to try to show this is no fairy story. I know the Musas well, they are friends and I know them to be honest and truthful. I hereby ask you to enforce the law as others I have contacted refused to investigate what I have told them regarding sexual crimes against a minor. This is not the 1st time I have reported serious crimes to Bournemouth police which have been totally ignored and something should be done about this. Thank you. J. Graham. —————————————— Another notice of the issuing of another E.P.O. concerning Favour Musa:
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:02:09 +0100
LETTER BEFORE CLAIM
TO Judge FROM: CC: {some names redacted} Mr Musa – under separate cover Bishop Gloria Musa – under separate cover Royal Courts of Justice – under separate cover Office for Judicial Complaints Myself REFERENCE DETAILS I understand, all EPO’s (Emergency Protection Orders) I submitted were not acted upon. I also understand it has been claimed that only the NSPCC and Social Services can apply for an EPO. Details of matter Please be advised it is my intention to apply for an urgent Judicial Review with regard to who has authority to apply for an EPO (in accordance with the Children Act 1989), as I have for Favour Musa, Tabitha Musa and Abraham Musa. I understand my applications were not acted upon receipt of same (3 in total). I hand-delivered one, which was stamped as received by the Court Usher ast Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court; therefore, claiming acceptance of the application. I will, therefore, be requesting a Judicial Review on this matter for future cases. I am sending Rt Hon Grant Shapps a copy of this e-mail, as I have kept him informed of this ongoing case since October 2010. Copy sent to John Hemming MP, as I mentioned to him at the Working Party on Family Law about the EPO applications. I would also like to make clear, I understand by making the application for Judicial Review, anyone in my family could be ‘at risk’ from intimidation / and threats. I shall be submitting an EX160B Form, which should be in receipt by approximately 10 working days. I look forward to receiving your reply within the stipulated 14 day period. Yours sincerely
CC: As above FORMS: C1 and C11 will be sent in a separate e-mail
Hi John We receive a number of unsubstantiated emails on the internet, however if there is evidence to support the allegations they should be forwarded to the correct police force to deal. I have taken advice from my Inspector and if a crime has occurred it will have to be investigated by the owning force area as previously given. This would need to be dealt in person by that Force. Regards Police Enquiry Centre —–Original Message—– From: butlincat . [mailto:adamski2012@hotmail.co..uk] Sent: 11 May 2011 13:56 To: .Enquiries Subject: FW: paedophiles
I am also surprised youve said: “…instead of sending this type of email to a vast number of random people.” as I certainly never intimated that at all and I doubt very much if this statement is anywhere near the truth. A typo exists in my message – that being it is only Favour Musa who has not been seen by anybody for nearly 10 months, probably because she has complained about sexual molestation at a placement address. Also I have paperwork to suggest an E.P.O. is being sought by party connected to the family. If I have heard nothing from you within 24 hours I will notify the Chief Constable etc.
——————————————————————————– From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk To: enquiries@dorset.pnn.police.uk Subject: RE: paedophiles Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:41:05 +0100 The emailer did not send it to numerous people to my knowledge, but to only me presumably as he was very worried. His local police are implicit in the many crimes involved in the taking of the 5 children. Note: I repeat – Chiwar Musa is unable to go to his local police as they removed the children in the 1st pllace on false allegations given by Haringey council, so it is impossible for him to go to his local police. Nobody has seen the children from the family for 10 months how, and in the past the daughter has claimed if being molested at the care home. I have notified you of potential crimes.Please forward the name of your superintendant or Chief Constable so I may contact him / them about this serious matter. Thank you. J. Graham.
Hi John I would have thought that the emailer should or would contact the local police instead of sending this type of email to a vast number of random people. I presume you have no knowledge of the emailer. Regards Karen Police Enquiry Centre —–Original Message—– From: butlincat . [mailto:adamski2012@hotmail.co..uk] Sent: 11 May 2011 13:19 To: .Enquiries Subject: FW: paedophiles
This email below i received at the time / date shown – sincerely – John Graham ——————————————————————————– The alarming message sent to me that I reported yet nothing was done by the police or Chief Constable: From: musa91@hotmail.co.uk To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk; butlincat75@googlemail.com Subject: paedophiles Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:56:57 +0000 This was fowardeded to me
HELP ! FAVOUR MUSA AGE 10 IS BEING ABUSED BY A GANG OF PAEDOPHILES !
LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS 21 MEMSTEAD ROAD ,ERITH, KENT , DA8 3LA
Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Harringey Council to see or phone her;
Haringey Council have refused her aunts, uncles and,grandparents (9 family members in all) any contact with Favour even though they all came especially from Africa to see her ! She has 5 sisters and a brother ,and none of them have seen her for weeks !
Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION !
Favour needs YOUR HELP !! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER BECAUSE SHE DARED TO REPORT BEING ABUSED WHILE “IN CARE” !!
HARRINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P,and Victoria Climbé They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds !
We do not know if she is alive or dead !! PLEASE,PLEASE, find and contact Favour , she is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS !!
AS if the Taunton MP ridiculous and insulting escapade was not stupid enough now this South Wales Police Operation Bridger (Joe Cox MP) conspiracy is all to stop my civil claims and especially my one million pound South Wales Police ‘machine gun’ conspiracy civil claim re to have me locked away for life in Ashworth’s psychiatric prison!
There is a strong rumour about that I am to be served with a Two million Pound police lawyer bill and restraining order to stop me keep publishing
The Cardiff County Court judge’s trial judgment of the South Wales Police’s, thought to be their last ‘throw of the dice’ to have me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act and gaoled in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital indefinitely, will be ‘handed down; at 10.30am in the Cardiff civil justice Centre
I invite my website readers, from around the world, to study this most ‘unusual judgment and highlight the apparent errors and obviously deliberate omissions, admitted, for the appeal court shortly. Thankyou —my Tel 07708586202 mauricejohnkirk.com
Acquittal costs re Exeter Crown Court today Judge Evans begrudgingly said could be as much as £50 for last week’s ‘found not guilty’ in ‘Found on M5 with a knife in a public case’. Wow!!! What on earth can I do with all that cash????
The South Wales Policeman’s helmet, incidentally, was carried in the back of my WW2 Piper cub to somewhere in Ethiopia, enroute to South Africa, specifically to highlight the wickedness of top South Wales Police personnel in Gold Group, instructed by Barbara Wilding, to scupper my million pound BS614159 civil claim from 40 odd failed malicious criminal prosecutions.
Breton cottage, orchard and tennis court. one hour from Portsmouth ferry, for only £100,000
The bulk of yesterday’s grossly inaccurate Judge Pettts judgment was already predicted as it had been written years ago when Dolmans, only interested in the money, money, money refused to consider any mediation contrary to European law.
When did a Cardiff court ever allow ‘the rule of law’ get in the way of their overall agenda to protect lucrative police pensions despite having been proved a bunch of liars so many times?
All this was predicted 20 years ago as the level of Gold Group deceit, administering a harmless individual like me as a MAPPA level 3 top 5%most dangerous, had percolated higher.
His Honour Judge Petts appears to have ignored my N244 application form, to consider the remarkable damming new evidence, from cross examination by my barrister, Mr David Leathley,
The last judge, His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn, when adjudicating over thirty odd previous failed malicious criminal prosecutions, found only three in my favour despite the thirty odd acquittals needing no legal representation! He also deliberately delayed my attempts to appeal his gibberish judgment to HM Court of Appeal by sixteen months by refusing to having it simply ‘sealed’.
It took me three visits to London’s Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice to finally get this most senior civil judge in the welsh court system to begrudgingly ‘stamp’ his seal on his own fairy tale judgment on the last day before his retirement.
At about that time I had identified 123 criminal allegations that had been brought against me, by the bullying welsh police, with my 89% success rate. The remainder of the allegations were used for a bus load of welsh coppers to travel to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, in 2002, to successfully have my name removed from the veterinary register for life.
That leaves me with about ten outstanding failed malicious criminal prosecutions brought by the Welsh police, also all remarkably only from the Cardiff and Barry area, to be put before a civil court for appropriate financial compensation.
His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers, back in the 90s I think it was, had granted me a jury in the BS614159 civil claim, for a shortened list of incidents under deliberation but this was quickly overturned in the Swansea county court – oh, surprise, surprise!
My moving back to Taunton, England and to a climate of ‘veracity’ and and a sense of ‘fair play’, it not vey long before the police were again harassing me, It turned out to be by the South Wales Police, again, having maliciously fabricated fictitious criminal prosecutions such as ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’ and ‘narcotics’!
The South Wales Police went further before the Oct 2019 HM Parole Board meeting advocating I was violent and a serious ‘risk’ to society but why or what for they could not explain!
With HM Parole Board’s futile attempt to get both my parole officer and police liaison officer prison guard to explain their reports, that I was very dangerous and a serious risk to the general public if released, was witnessed by my retired magistrate sister, Celia Jeune.
Neither of the welsh gentlemen would answer the Chairman of the Board’s question.
In a final act of welsh brutality eight HMP Parc G4S prison staff were responsible for violently ejecting me from my cell, on 1st November 2019, while my hands were both unnecessarily handcuffed behind my back.
Why, in order to steal both my three years of medical records, including those of the sacked and now ‘deported’ to New Zealand’ Caswell Clinic inappropriately qualified forensic psychiatrist now so desperately needed by my GP and specialists at Musgrove Park Hospital.
Also stolen, of course, were my BS614159 appeal papers and 1CF03361 ‘trading in machineguns; police conspiracy legal papers with the former civil action, still ongoing, taking a decade to reach a ‘compensation. hearing and today’s ‘machinegun’ hearing a mere twelve. and that is before I start the appeal. tomorrow at the Royal Courts of Justice.
My other shy daughter, Belinda
