Brittany protects Harassed English Vet from Extradition to the UK

Thanks to a leaked report, Maurice has known about the ‘license to kill‘ of South Wales Police for a few months.

But since the outstanding Warrant for Arrest in November, he’s tried whatever he could to make sure he won’t be put behind bars or into a psychiatric clinic, yet another time.

These are the two points that he told the authorities in Rennes, the capital of Brittany, where his fingerprints were taken, and papers are being prepared for automatic extensions.

After all, he is currently not only fighting for his medical records to have a hip operation, but also a civil action against South Wales Police, for damages to himself, his surgery and his family of 18 years of harassment, false imprisonments and the non-investigation of crimes.

So another imprisonment is distinctly NOT on the agenda. For more details, please phone him on his English mobile 0790 793 7953.

Maybe the Christmas Spirit will bring some sanity into TPTB (the powers that be), not only for the sake of Maurice Kirk, but also to Wikileaks and Julian Assange?

Posted in Access to Justice, HM Court Services | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Christmas Wish to NHS solicitors: Please release medical records

Dear Sir or Madam

I am writing to you as McKenzie Friend and web publisher of Mr Maurice Kirk BVSc, as you can see in the attachment.

You can read below that Ms Bloomfield, Deputy Head of Investigations and Redress of the University Health Board, promised you were going to correspond with Mr Kirk, regarding his medical records.

Everybody on the Cc list knows, they are required for his hip operation, last scheduled on June 22nd. Every day on morphine and other medication with its side effect worsens the situation. Which century of “paid barbarism” do we live in? As Louise Casey, the Victims Commissioner, said to me: we’ve got a hearts and minds job to do.

Might you be moved to act in view of Christmas?

Our online petition WANTED: Fair Trials and Compensation spells out the five parties that could release the records:

A. The CEO of the NHS, David Sissling

B. The Caswell Clinic where he was detained for 12 weeks

C. XX, the Director of Caswell Clinic, who gave the information at 2ndDecember 09 Cardiff Crown Court of ‘significant brain damage’ and ‘possible brain tumour’, sufficient to oppose Mr Kirk bail or recommend he be allowed to act in person in the imminent trial proceedings

D. the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) who gave oral information to His Honour Judge Bidder QC, after examining the withheld information on 2nd December 2009 at Cardiff Crown Court

E. HM Prison, Cardiff, under whose ‘care’ he was at the time of the court hearing on 2nd December 2009.

Given the time you’ve taken NOT to respond, this is therefore an URGENT request to answer promptly.

Yours sincerely,

Sabine K McNeill

________________

Blogger, Victims Unite!
… Empowering victims of financial exploitation and legal oppression

 

Web publisher and McKenzie Friend, Flying Vet and Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police
… Advancing the Cause for Litigants in Person

Petitioning “HM Partnership“:
WANTED: Fair Trials and Compensation
: > 160 signatures and 2,000 page views

Publisher, Enforcement of Bank of England Act 1694
… Based on Early Day Motions 1297 and 597 tabled by Austin Mitchell MP

Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies
… Advocating Economic Democracy through Freedom from National Debt

Currently:
Buschower Dorfstr. 16 – 14715 Märkisch Luch – Brandenburg
T: 0049 33876 90166 – M: 07968 039 141

From: ABM Complaints [mailto:ABM.Complaints@wales.nhs.uk]
Sent: 19 November 2010 14:51
To: Sabine K McNeill; emma.kelly-dempster@chre.org.uk
Cc: ‘Maurice Kirk’
Subject: RE: Your correspondance with Mr Norman Scarth re Mr Maurice Kirk

Dear Ms McNeill,

I would advise that the Health Board’s legal representatives correspond with Mr Kirk directly.

Your correspondance will be forwarded to our legal representatives and any response provided directly to Mr Kirk.

Yours sincerely,

KATE BLOOMFIELD
Deputy Head of Investigations and Redress

Direct Tel: 01639 683374 Fax: 01639 687675

Bwrdd Iechyd Prifysgol
Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board

Pencadlys ABM / ABM Headquarters
1 Talbot Gateway, Port Talbot, SA12 7BR
Kate.Bloomfield
@wales.nhs.uk

 

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 13: effective remedy before national authorities, Campaigning, Fair Trial, HM Court Services, Letter to CEO of Local Health Board | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Maurice on video in Jersey: between WARRANT for ARREST, Order to Shoot and the Need for a Hip Operation

Due to a leaked report from the psychiatric clinic, Maurice knows that South Wales Police have a “firearms response” or licence to kill. Here’s the 12-minute interview on Jersey, on the way to Alderney, where he’s asked for asylum.

Maurice has already spent nearly 8 months in prison unlawfully, but fraud and unlawful behaviour by national authorities are virtually impossible to prosecute in the UK:

  • some 1000 organisations are immune to prosecution by Royal Charter
  • these include the Law Society which has a Memorandum of Understandingwith the Association of Chief Police Officers not to investigate crime
  • the UK Human Rights Act 1998 omits Article 1 and 13 from the European Convention for Human Rights; as a result it is impossible for UK citiznes to get a fair trial and compensation, let alone an effective remedy before national authorities.

The veracity of these claims can be seen best in these comments to WANTED: Fair Trials and Compensation as well as in the comments to Stop the Oppression of the British people.

Maurice is not alone, but his current action has been postponed until March 14th, while he is expected to respond to a 40-page judgement within 7 days… Will he get operated outside the country until then?

Posted in Article 13: effective remedy before national authorities, Article 1: binding, Article 6: fair trial, European Law of Human Rights | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

More than 100 of 200 signatures on our online petition targeted at “HM Partnership”

Our online petition is entitled WANTED: Fair Trials and Compensation – in lieu of an Effective Remedy before National Authorities.

As soon as we have 200 signatures together, they will be sent to anybody relating to HM Partnership, the institutions and organisations that form ‘the establishment’ of people who are employed ‘to just do their job’.

The petitions on No. 10 used to specify that the minimum of 200 signatures needs to be reached before a petition is taken seriously.

My first mailout resulted in more than 500 page views and 37 signatures. Now we have had nearly 1,000 page views!

I’m collecting comments by signatories as they form a most wonderful imprint of the feelings that surround institutions and ‘the system’. In fact, the comments are very similar in spirit to those that we collected with Stop the Oppression of the British people.

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 13: effective remedy before national authorities, Article 6: fair trial, European Law of Human Rights, Fair Trial, Support | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

We need these “rebels of genius”

This is a comment contributed to our online petition by signatory no. 23: Anton Pinschof.

Somebody long ago decided to go for this rebel. Judge Jeffreys would be proud. Why not go after the banksters? All this wasted energy just to resist bullying. Why not try him for some real crime? Such a vendetta may be sporting distraction for the lower ranks, but it also reeks of obscure motives best known to upper echelons of a protection racket behind the decor, coldly following a cynical decision. Proof enough that we need these rebels of genius!

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 13: effective remedy before national authorities, Article 6: fair trial, Campaigning, Fair Trial, HM Court Services | Comments Off on We need these “rebels of genius”

Wishing for Fair Trials: in Guernsey (1983), Cardiff (2009) and UK-wide (2010)

Maurice protests up a craneImagine: climbing onto a crane to campaign for a Fair Trial in Guernsey in 1983… after all, Maurice was a climbing instructor, and the crane “was just there”…

But in 2009, he was not alone when his supporters commented on the absence of fairness in Cardiff Court – on his website, his only hope in hell…

And in 2010, we’re joining e-forces with LOTS of people ‘out there in cyberspace’ – with this online petition, targeted at “HM Partnership“. Are you going to click and sign or read people’s comments first?

Posted in Access to Justice, Fair Trial | Tagged , | Comments Off on Wishing for Fair Trials: in Guernsey (1983), Cardiff (2009) and UK-wide (2010)

WANTED: a fair trial in the UK where Article 6 of the Human Rights Act is supposed to guarantee that human right

Here it says: In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.

Well, how come that Maurice has had such difficulty experiencing “fair trials” in his oodles of legal actions? Why can’t he find trustworthy lawyers any more?

What can you and I do to make them happen?

Is the “hearts and minds job” required, that Louise Casey, the Victim Commissioner mentioned?

More on Fair Trial, Effective Remedy (Human Rights Articles 6 and 13) versus just What?

Posted in Access to Justice, Fair Trial | Tagged , , | Comments Off on WANTED: a fair trial in the UK where Article 6 of the Human Rights Act is supposed to guarantee that human right

Mind the Gap: between Human Rights in the EU and the UK

Theoretically, the right to a fair trial is guaranteed in the UK thanks to the 1998 Human Rights Act. Why does it not happen in practice???

In practice, many victims I’ve had contact with feel that their only hope is the EU; that is

It is most embarrassing to learn that those victims who have ‘success’ on the European level report that they get harassed in the UK… See Norman Scarth and Raymond Fox.

It is even more embarrassing when Maurice Kirk‘s experiences lay it bare open that

  • he can never have a fair trial (Article 6)
  • nor is there an effective remedy (Article 13) for national authorities such as
  1. the NHS who withhold his medical records while their legal representatives ignore letters from Alun Cairns MP and Edwina Hart Am
  2. HM Court Services who don’t provide transcripts and logs and are generally not co-operative
  3. HM Prison who denied any knowledge of MAPPA categorisation
  4. or the HM Treasury Solicitor who doesn’t pay up the judgments in Maurice’s favour…

No wonder Maurice is frustrated with “HM Partnership“…

Posted in Access to Justice, Article 13: effective remedy before national authorities, Article 6: fair trial, HM Court Services | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Harassment by South Wales Police means LOTS of motoring incidents plus false imprisonments, non-investigation of crimes plus…

The current case for civil damages “Kirk v South Wales Police” has been called “unusual”, “extreme” and “indefinite”.

And indeed, this list of motoring incidents is only a small beginning.

For what is worse: to be struck off the Register of Veterinary Surgeons, to be kept in prison or in a psychiatric clinic? Maurice says that Caswell Clinic was MUCH worse than prison!

Here’s a 21-page judgment from the Privy Council that spelled out in 2004 why Maurice is wonderful with animals but has problems with people, supposedly…

And here is a 20-page document about 5 Actions of Harassment that combines:

  • 4 pages of a position statement of Maurice as Plaintiff
  • 6 pages of Abuse of Process Application commenting on the then Chief Constable Barbara Wilding‘s False Affidavit sworn on 25 February 2009, where paragraphs 14 – 20 are known to be wrong
  • a 6-page letter to his then MP John Smith of 22 April 2009
  • a few ancillary emails.
Posted in Privy Council, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons – one of around 1000 organisations protected from prosecution by Royal Charter

For South Wales Police to succeed in getting Maurice struck off the register of practising veterinary surgeons was hurt- and painful, not only for Maurice, but his parents, wife and children.

Can you imagine the ‘social disgrace’ resulting from having been an adored and admired vet in the local community?

Well, instead of moaning and complaining, Maurice fights in ‘flight forward mode’:

Extract of 2004 Statutory Instrument:

20.3 On receipt of an application to which this Rule applies, the application shall be listed for hearing within 3 months.

20.6 At the hearing of an application to which this Rule applies –

(a) The applicant shall be entitled to address the Committee, and to adduce evidence and make submissions, in support of the application;

(b) The Solicitor shall be entitled to address the Committee, and to adduce evidence and make submissions, in opposition to the application.

However, the real firewall was built by Royal Charters. As you will read here, the first one was given in 1067 by William the Conqueror to the Corporation of the City of London. (!!!) 

Posted in Access to Justice | Tagged , | Comments Off on The Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons – one of around 1000 organisations protected from prosecution by Royal Charter