Remarkable South Wales Police disclosure today after nearly two years denying there were other relevant letters from my prison cell stuffed with ‘anthrax/heroin to MPs, I was told in the prison at the time but now, a near two year later, an old forensic examination is disclosed of the powder as a HARMLESS white powder!
South Wales Police 45th failed criminal conspiracy against Maurice starts to fragment on its lies.
So, prosecution exhibit 21 admits it was likely to have been heroin, all along to the then HM Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns MP, in May 2019 from Cardiff prison! BUT who controls a MAPPA 24/7 surveillance for so ‘very dangerous’ prisoner?
Every South Wales Police communication with England, in this two years of nonsense, reveals malice and so easily proven as deliberate lies to frighten the MPs implicated.
. Yet another Welsh police conspiracy to pervert the course of justice due to my £500, 000 + ‘trading in machine guns’ damages claim listed for September 2021
The welsh can continue to lie as is their inherent trait but stop making a fool of my judiciary, police force and prisons or I may have to progress to plan J and pay you a visit.
ALL INVITED to September Trial where SWP malicious prosecution , for a ten year prison term to snuff out my 40 odd failed police malicious prosecutions civil claim, BS612159 etc will be re exposed.
This recently welsh police leaked English certificate along side liar, Richard Thomlow, then prosecutor now judge, confirms the orchestrated welsh criminal conspiracy continues now in Exeter Crown Court.
|DEFENDANT’S APPLICATION FOR PROSECUTION DISCLOSURE (Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, section 8; Criminal Procedure Rules, rule 22.5)|
|Case details Name of Defendant: Maurice John Kirk Court: Crown Court Case reference number: Charge:|
|Note: You must give a defence statement, and allow the prosecutor time to respond, before you can make an application for prosecution disclosure.|
How to use this form 1. Complete the Case details box above and answer the questions set out in the boxes below. If you use an electronic version of this form, the boxes will expand. If you use a paper version and need more space, you may attach extra sheets
2. Attach to this form: (a) a copy of your defence statement, and (b) copies of any correspondence with the prosecutor about disclosure. 3. Sign and date the completed form. 4. Send a copy of the completed form and everything attached to: (a) the court, and (b) the prosecutor.
|1) What material do you want the prosecutor to disclose? The Defendant’s introductory 2nd and 6th September 2016, 15th December 2019,14th May 2020, 5th June 2020 letters to xxxxxxx MP, all correspondence with Alan Cairns MP and his medical records from Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, stolen from him at HMP Cardiff and HMP The aforesaid provide important explanatory evidence of the Defendant’s duress of circumstances and motive for the alleged index allegation.|
|2) Why do you think the prosecutor has that material ? His Honour Judge Johnson and/or His Honour Judge Evans directed HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) to obtain the evidence from the South Wales Police and G4S Custodial Services at HMP Parc, Bridgend many, many months ago but refused as deemed ‘irrelevant’. In truth, the South Wales Police, HMP Cardiff and G4S run HMP Parc, unlawfully withhold relevant evidence that has the very real risk of quashing, not just this outstanding insulting indictment but will quash the Defendant’s previous 5 years of prison sentences in order to have his name restored to the UK’s veterinary register and CAA’s list of current Commercial Pilots.|
The CPS (England) therefore has in his/her control all the Defendant’s stolen property at Parc Prison asked for by Ms Selaine Saxby MP, Defendant’s parole officer, Mr Bradley Hughes and Defendant but all, of course, were refused, in fact, ignored.
|3) Why might that material: (a) undermine the prosecutor’s case against you, or (b) assist your case? |
The full Caswell Clinic medical records will disclose the now sacked NHS doctor, ‘deported’ to South Island of New Zealand, had said to a clandestine 2nd December 2009 Cardiff Crown Court that his victim was so very, very dangerous (top 5% terrorist level’), while the Defendant was both absent and not legally represented, be MAPPA level 3 category 3 registered due to his ‘significant brain damage’ and PDD, Paranoid ‘Delusional Disorder’, due to his misconceived belief he was being persecuted by the then Chief Constable, Ms Barbara Wilding,
This victim’s MAPPA registration was first recorded on the 8th June 2009 in Barry’s police station, in Operation Chalice to have him ‘lawfully shot’ and in ‘Operation Snowdrop’ plans for the seizure of his then 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, to be taken into ‘care’.
The rogue doctor had never seen the Defendant before registration but had recommended the Defendant should be detained, indefinitely, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.
The doctor, it has now been proven, was blackmailed by the South Wales Police to present his victim’s fabricated 19th October 2009 psychiatric report to the court on 2nd December 2009.
However, the mandatory second forensic report required from a similar level 12 forensic psychiatrist was not forthcoming or the Defendant would still be incarcerated in Ashworth twelve years later.This is partly the reason why the rogue police doctor was not allowed to be cross examined by his own victim and why successive both civil and criminal court proceedings were blocked for the rogue to be a witness for either party.
The Defendant seeks help from the appropriate UK authority, while the rogue police doctor is currently ‘at large’ in the Cardiff area, for a witness summons to be served on both him and his wife to attend the next hearing to quash this South Wales Police conspired nonsense once and for all.
Further, the victim’s unlawfully withheld MAPPA, MG6D, PII. FOI and OASys records will disclose the original alleged Defendant’s ‘breached restraining orders’ were deliberately never ‘served’ on him in the first place!
CPS barrister, M Smythe, will corroborate much of these facts.Mr Michael Smythe of Queens Square Chambers, Bristol requires a witness summons to attend to confirm the above documented facts are to be disclosed in all further court hearings.
The orchestrated ‘restraining orders’ were in order to frustrate the Defendant’s many civil claims against the South Wales Police (eg G00TA220, BS614159, 1CF03361and at least eight more.##
All arise from well over forty failed malicious criminal prosecutions for a South Wales Police 11% success from 113 criminal allegations sufficient for his five years in prison, much on remand before numerous acquittals
.Disclose police station’s proforma, given to each prisoner under caution, reveals HM Ministry of Justice advise that if his PLANS A, B, C, D, E and possibly F, H or K, failed then the victim is encouraged to take up his or her grievance with his or her constituency MP and if blocked, as in this case, to ask HM Speaker of the House to approach an alternative MP on behalf of the xxxxxx constituent.AND when he or she receives no replies, over a number of years as in this current case, then he is entitled, through applications to either his Conservative Party, having been a lapsed member or the Citizen’s Advice Bureau, under Article One of 1948 European Charter of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, struck out, incidentally by the PM warmonger, at the time, for the impotent UK 1998 Human Rights Act.
Of course, the South Wales Police refuses Ms Selaine Saxby MP, Alun Cairns MP and HM Parole Board from obtaining appropriate disclosure for this current indictment, on the Defendant’s behalf, due to the level of deceit within too many in the South Wales judiciary, police force and custodial services.The culprits are in positions of privilege while answerable to no one, not even the ‘rule of law’.
|4) Do you want the court to arrange a hearing of this application ? YES If YES, explain why you think a hearing is needed. (If you do not ask for a hearing, the court may arrange one anyway.)|
|Signed: ………Maurice J Kirk BVSc …………………………………….. defendant |
Date: …………9th February 2021………………….. …… ………
ALEX SALMOND’S REMARKABLY SIMILAR ADDRESS TO SCOTTISH AUTHORITIES TO THE WELSH MACHINE GUN CONSPIRACY COVER-UP TO HAVE ME SHOT
(Well done, Terry)
Submission Alex Salmond
This is my fourth submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry. It should be read in
addition to, and in conjunction with, the three other previous submissions. Those prior
submissions relate to the application of the procedure (phase 2), the Judicial Review
(phase 3) and the Ministerial Code (phase 4).
This final document accordingly includes an introduction and overview of matters
linking each of the four individual submissions
It thereafter includes submissions on
- phase 1 of the Inquiry.
- the question of ‘conspiracy’
- Crown Office
Documentary evidence exists to support all of the factual statements made in this
submission. I have sought to provide that to the Committee where it is within my
power to do so. Despite repeated requests, however, Crown Office has not provided
the Committee with the critical evidence which was unable to be led in the High
Court. Perhaps even more concerning is the direction from Crown Office that I face
the prospect of criminal prosecution for even referring to the existence of such
evidence or specifying (even in broad terms) what that evidence is. One of their letters
even suggested that the Committee’s use of such documentation might also constitute
a criminal offence
My hope and belief, expressed outside the High Court in Edinburgh after my
acquittal, was that documents which were not put before the jury and the public would
be published in the course of this Inquiry. To date, and despite the centrality of those
documents to the remit of this Committee and the overwhelming public interest in
their publication, Crown Office continue to veto any such publication under threat of
Despite that deplorable prohibition, I can confirm that all of the material factual
statements made in this submission are supported by documentary evidence. Where I
am legally allowed to direct the Committee to such documents, I will be happy to do
REMARKABLE SIMILARITY TO WELSH COVER-UP in p 10 0f 36 page redacted AS submission!
#The question of ‘conspiracy’
It has been a matter of considerable public interest whether there was ‘a conspiracy’. I
have never adopted the term but note that the Cambridge English Dictionary defines it
as ‘the activity of secretly planning with other people to do something bad or illegal.’
I leave to others the question of what is, or is not, a conspiracy but am very clear in
my position that the evidence supports a deliberate, prolonged, malicious and
concerted effort amongst a range of individuals within the Scottish Government and
the SNP to damage my reputation, even to the extent of having me imprisoned.