The Die is Cast after 50 Years of Greenslades Estate Agents Nefarious Activities across Somerset

(HM Justice Minister Robert Buckland QC and who casts the first stone?)

By HM Crown Prosecution Service now dropping of the charges, drawn up under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2001, of my alleged sending a blob of Cardiff prison issue toothpaste, as remnants of glue on the back of the WANTED poster of notorious sacked South Wales Police blackmailed doctor.

He, quite unqualified but promised immunity to prosecution, of course, for perjury, had asked a court, welsh of course, I should be locked up for life in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.

Why? Due to my ‘significant brain damage’ the South Wales Police had relied on in order to have me shot on their 22nd June 2009 armed helicopter raid on our home in in the Vale of Glamorgan.

The welsh police had , just days before, had had me registered MAPPA level 3, top 5% most dangerous, in order to have me shot (see leaked Barry police station 8th June 2009 MAPPA secret meeting with senior police officers.

Now, in order for this ‘can of worms’ to bow out with no external police investigation, , CPS opposes my application for evidence of relevant disclosure from obvious witnesses for my half million pound G4S HMP Parc, Bridgend, damages claim , contrary to Article 3, torture.

So I must subpoena my next MP, Alun Cairns MP

Exeter Crown Court Case no T20200177

25^th January 2021 1CF03361/BS614159 + others

Dear Clerk of the Court,

In my request for Mr Alun Cairns MP to respond to my emails asking for evidence he had helped me, over nine years, concerning South Wales Police bullying, false allegations and fabricated convictions, you replied thus:

Exeter Crn, Enquiries

14 Jan 2021, 07:25 (11 days ago)

Exeter Crn, Enquiries

to me

Dear Mr Kirk

Your application has been put before the Judge for his consideration and has been refused on the following grounds

The application does not explain, in an intelligible way, what evidence the supposed witness can produce, why it is likely to be material evidence, or why it would be in the interests of justice to issue the summons. These are required, by Criminal Procedure Rule 17, of all applications for witness summonses. In accordance with section 2(3) of the Criminal Procedure (Attendance of Witnesses) Act 1965, I refuse to issue the summons.

Regards

Exeter Crown Court

FAO Clerk of the Court 25th January 2021

Your court has indicated the CPS will obtain relevant evidence from Ms Selaine Saxby MP who had also created an ‘audit trail’ by writing to G4S Parc prison for my stolen legal and medical records, clothes, shoes and wheelchair. Requested for my barrister and Taunton GP while my gastroenterology Musgrove hospital team ask where my past three years of welsh medical records are????? Withheld, of course, by welsh police as much of it is falsified to have me incarcerated, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital ridiculously registered MAPPA level 3 category 3 to be amongst the top 5% most dangerous.

As the learned judge, only last week, directed my request for CPS, to produce evidence that is seriously detrimental under CPR from Ms Selaine Saxby MP and no doubt, under ‘Operation Bridger’, could then the same be ‘ordered’ of Alun Cairns MP for simple documents be disclosed as did all six MPs, previously helping me as part of their constituency duties, from thirty years of my suffering under South Wales Police quite unchecked nefarious conduct ???

Extract of law even the welsh authorities cannot beat.

Criminal Procedure (Attendance of Witnesses) Act 1965

Issue of witness summons on application to Crown Court.

(1)This section applies where the Crown Court is satisfied that—

(a)a person is likely to be able to give evidence likely to be material evidence, or produce any document or thing likely to be material evidence, for the purpose of any criminal proceedings before the Crown Court, and

[F2(b)it is in the interests of justice to issue a summons under this section to secure the attendance of that person to give evidence or to produce the document or thing.]

(2)In such a case the Crown Court shall, subject to the following provisions of this section, issue a summons (a witness summons) directed to the person concerned and requiring him to—

(a)attend before the Crown Court at the time and place stated in the summons, and

(b)give the evidence or produce the document or thing.

(3)A witness summons may only be issued under this section on an application; and the Crown Court may refuse to issue the summons if any requirement relating to the application is not fulfilled.

[F3(4)Where a person has been sent for trial for any offence to which the proceedings concerned relate, an application must be made as soon as is reasonably practicable after service on that person, in pursuance of regulations made under paragraph 1 of Schedule 3 to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, of the documents relevant to that offence.]

F4(5). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(6)Where the proceedings concerned relate to an offence in relation to which a bill of indictment has been preferred under the authority of section 2(2)(b) of the M1 Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1933 (bill preferred by direction of Court of Appeal, or by direction or with consent of judge) an application must be made as soon as is reasonably practicable after the bill was preferred.

[F5(6A)Where the proceedings concerned relate to an offence that is the subject of a deferred prosecution agreement within the meaning of Schedule 17 to the Crime and Courts Act 2013, an application must be made as soon as is reasonably practicable after the suspension of the proceedings is lifted under paragraph 2(3) of that Schedule.]

(7)An application must be made in accordance with [F6Criminal Procedure Rules]; and different provision may be made for different cases or descriptions of case.

(8)[F6Criminal Procedure Rules]—

(a)may, in such cases as the rules may specify, require an application to be made by a party to the case;

(b)may, in such cases as the rules may specify, require the service of notice of an application on the person to whom the witness summons is proposed to be directed;

(c)may, in such cases as the rules may specify, require an application to be supported by an affidavit containing such matters as the rules may stipulate;

(d)may, in such cases as the rules may specify, make provision for enabling the person to whom the witness summons is proposed to be directed to be present or represented at the hearing of the application for the witness summons.

Six of my reasonable letters to Alun Cairns MP, over a year, blocked

The response from the remote server was:

550 Undeliverable mail [AAGg_BshNIGUpxzpVnuOzQ.uk245]

WHO HAS BEEN NOBBLED by whom ?

Ms Haxby MP now refuses to send on copies of the correspondence re my HMP Parc with Alun Cairns MP now likewise

It stinks, does it not?

Maurice Kirk ignored Complaint to Avon and Somerset Constabulary

includes:

South Wales Police’s fabricated criminal convictions for gaol purely to disrupt my civil claims
G4S criminal medical negligence, re carcinogenic lesions. was to finally have me ‘snuffed out’
G4S’s deliberate assaults, for inmates to witness, resulted in evicting me from Parc Priso in handcuffs behind my baclk only to finish up in Bristol hospital for hip x-ray etc
Alun Cairns MP is recipient by post of a mysterious ‘unidentified harmless’ white powder
The ‘white powder’ remains ‘unidentified’ to block my March release on parole to Taunton

On the 4th Dec 2018 the welsh parole system caused, if not by error, for the disclosure of a section of my police ‘constructed’ OAsysis Assessment with over so easily proven 100 lies

SWP worldwide distribution of those fictitious criminal convictions caused both anguish and humour due to their stupid content with some hilarious incidents along the way. It included my US deportation in ankle-chains from Texas to the comical temporary detention in Pontivy Brittany psychiatric hospital. This left the nursing staff in fits of laughter but leaving the yet unanswered question as to just when and by whom was this conspiracy hatched?

Who is responsible to pervert the course of justice after my malicious 2010 ‘trading in machine-guns’ farcical trial? Who wants a copy of the iniquitous transcript?

These fictitious criminal convictions, now promised as removed from Parole Board record, are those that could do most harm to me in my re instatement application to the veterinary register and guaranteed me ‘a hard time’ in a class C welsh G4S run prison .

Bullying quite out of control G4S staff usie their prison for their mindless self-gratification.

The 4^th December 2018 police 50 odd page ‘fairy tale’ included my having convictions for:

‘Child abuse’ b) ‘Firearms’ c) ‘Narcotics’ d) ‘Racially aggravated Public Order’ d) ‘Actual Bodily Harm’ and e)FTA ‘fail to attend’

The story as to why cannot yet be told is because of restraining order restrictions, to protect cri minals in positions of privilage agreed by me in order to obtain release and because of the far more sinister subject. How and why the South Wales Police and Dolmans, solicitors, especially, have acted so fraudulently to have had me gaoled for 5 full years of my life.

24^th Jan 2020 @10am machine-gun civil claim at Cardiff’s Civil Justice Centre All invited with lunch on me! Study the facts up on line. Could this level of wickedness have been in an English court? Police had unblocked the Lewis gun barrel, had her painted back to the colour of when I had owned the decommissioned gun while jury insisted there was a police plant amongst them!

[Lawyer/ journalist urgently needed please tel 07708586202 maurice@kirkflyingvet.com]