xxxxxx Street, 1CF03361
Taunton
Somerset


The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary
Police HQ
Cowbridge Road,
Bridgend
CF35 3SU


27th August 2020




Dear Sir/Madam,

Deliberate Perversion of Justice

UNLAWFUL STOPPAGE AND DETENTION OF PRISON LETTERS AT HMP PARC and HMP CARDIFF – LETTER BEFORE CLAIM – TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977 – PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997 AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1999


I write to request the delivery up of thirty-two letters that were stopped without informing me whilst at HMP Parc or at HMP Cardiff when I was serving an unlawful prison sentence there between 17th December 2017 and 1st November 2019.

The reason that these letters were wrongfully stopped and detained was because none of the criteria set out in rule 34(3)(a)-(h) and rule 35A(4)(a)-(f) of the Prison Rules 1999 applied to their contents.

I therefore request the immediate delivery up of these letters payment of damages concerning its unlawful seizure and detention for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.

I also request payment of damages for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 concerning the unlawful stoppage and detention of these letters.

I also request copy of the 16 arch leaver files referred to by the Chief Constable’s QC at the last court hearing as now disclosable to this Claimant in 1CF03361 case that has been unlawfully delayed for almost 10 years.

Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of these prisons stopped letters and sixteen 1CF03361 defence files resulting from yet another failed malicious prosecution, that I had ‘traded in machine guns’ contrary to s5 of the 1968 Firearms Act.

In addition, I will seek compensatory and aggravated damages from the South Wales Police and Avon & Somerset Police under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 regarding the unlawful stoppage and detention of these letters.

Kindly inform me if you are instructing solicitors and if so their address for service and whether they will accept service of proceedings on the chief constable’s behalf.



Yours faithfully


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Not malicious despite hearing evidence, (who wants a copy of the transcript?) in the ridiculously brought criminal hearing, from the purchaser of my 1916 replica DH2 biplane, not only had the police unblocked a piece of water pipe switched from an originally decommissioned Lewis machine gun, the conspiring senior officers also had painted the film prop a different colour in a vain attempt to fool the jury!

My recollection of the Lewis Gun that was owned by Mr. Maurice Kirk.

     I first viewed the gun when Mrs. Cooper and Mr. Page returned from collecting it and brought it through the aircraft hangar I was working in. I am a keen deactivated weapons collector and as such I made a point of having a closer look, I observed the gun was in very poor condition with heavy corrosion. The next morning the gun was laying on a workshop table in the hangar with a newly painted magazine on it, at this point I had to satisfy my own curiosity and had a close up look at the gun. I remember thinking it was so rough it looked like it had been dragged out the North Sea and was so badly corroded that some parts were almost gone, I then looked at the barrel and noted it had the usual metal rod down it and that it could not be cocked or dry fired and at this point I lost interest and put the gun down.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Some considerable time later I was called into Mr. Coopers office where upon he asked me to find him something to fit down the barrel of the Lewis Gun and I returned with an arc welding rod and in front of me Mr. Cooper poked the rod down the barrel of the Lewis gun and pointed out to everyone in the room that this was not the same gun that was taken from him. Although I was not asked for my opinion on that occasion I would agree that it appeared to be a different weapon as it looked in superior condition with a different magazine and all the moving parts looked to be in working condition.

I believe this to be a true and accurate account

signed by the witness

POLICE HARASSMENT CONTINUES

13 th May 2020

Managing Director
G4S
Registered Office
Southside
105 Victoria Street
London
SW1E 6QT

Dear Sir/Madam

UNLAWFUL REMOVAL OF MEDICAL RECORDS,WHEELCHAIR, CASE AND
LEGAL PAPERS FROM HMP PARC – REQUEST FOR THE DELIVERY UP OF
MEDICAL RECORDS, WHEELCHAIR, CASE AND LEGAL PAPERS
UNLAWFULLY REMOVED AND DETAINED AND LETTER BEFORE CLAIM –
TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977

I write to request the delivery up of all of my medical records, wheelchair case and legal
papers that officers and agents of your company wrongly seized and removed from me on my
discharge from HMP Parc on (here give date).
These case and legal papers belong to me and I have previously requested their return.
I now demand their immediate return under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.
Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of my
medical records, wheelchair, case and legal papers without further notice. In addition, I will
seek an Interim Injunction for the return of the medical records, wheel chair, case and legal
papers and will also seek compensatory and aggravated damages from G4S.
I would also be grateful if you could inform me if your company requires service at your
registered office above at Southside or at the UK Office in Sutton?
If you have instructed solicitors, I would also be grateful if you could inform me whether
they are agreeable to accept service on behalf of your company?
Yours faithfully

Maurice J BVSc

cc UK Office, GP & MP

AVON & SOMERSET POLICE JUMP IN ON THE ACT OF BLATANT HARASSMENT

20^th August 2020

Chief Constable of Avon & Somerset Police

Avon & Somerset Police HQ

Valley Road

Portishead

North Somerset

BS20 8JJ                            The 1st Defendant

and

Chief Executive Officer

Gerec Ltd

Unit 2a Dunball Industrial Estate

Bridgwater

TA6 4TP                            The 2nd Defendant

and

The Proprietor

Bulford Garage

Station Road

Wellington                         The 3rd Defendant

Dear Ladies or Gentlemen,

UNLAWFUL SEIZURE OF MOTOR VEHICLES AT BRIDGWATER and CREECH ST MICHAEL AND DETENTION AT DUNBALL and WELLINGTON– LETTER BEFORE CLAIM – TORTS (INTERFERENCE WITH GOODS) ACT 1977 – PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 1997 AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1999

I write to request the delivery up of Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD which was wrongfully and unlawfully seized by officers of the Avon and Somerset Constabulary on 22nd July 2020 and which is currently being unlawfully detained at the compound GEREC at Dunball.

This vehicle was and is continuing to be unlawfully detained because I am the lawful owner with an appropriate licence and insured to drive it away or by way of my car transporter.

In the alternative I produced a Mr A for no less than three hours in the police station disclosing both valid licence and valid insurance to drive my motor vehicle out of  the Gerec police seized vehicle pound whilst in my presence.

In addition, officers of the Avon and Somerset Police further wrongfully and unlawfully seized my lawfully owned Citroen despite my having proof of ownership, a valid driving licence and valid insurance. Thereafter it was detained at the compound at Wellington on the premise that only special insurance taken out would allow both vehicles being released. This was a falsehood with intent. The  seized vehicle was subsequently permitted to be driven away by me on a day  only last week 

I therefore request the immediate delivery up of the Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD and payment of damages concerning its unlawful seizure and detention for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 and await confirmation of this at a time and venue to be arranged.

I also request payment of damages for conversion and wrongful interference with goods under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 concerning the unlawful seizure and detention of both vehicles, both with  legal papers against the police, of deliberate harassment based on false South Wales Police data, namely disclosed in current cases including T20200177 at Exeter Crown Court and ICF03361. I was at all material time the lawful owner of both of these vehicles.

Failing which, I shall apply to the County Court for an order for the delivery up of the Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD. 

In addition, I will seek an Interim Injunction for the delivery up of the Volvo Estate vehicle AO 55 VCD and will seek compensatory and aggravated damages from Avon & Somerset Police and Garec Ltd under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Human Rights Act 1998 regarding the unlawful seizure and detention of both vehicles.

Until a traffic police officer examined my driving licence was it considered valid

Until a traffic police officer examined my Citroen ownership was it considered valid

Until a traffic police officer examined my Citroen insurance was it considered valid

I had indicated the Volvo had been purchased by me for France but a false imprisonment from Taunton magistratess in May 2020, exacerbated by  South Wales Police”s further malicious criminal allegations, by deliberately withholding relevent 1st Aug 2019 data caused me significant mental anguish and worry from this almost 60 years of police harassment

The said data from my interview, from prison under caution, was suppressed because it¹ revealed  many of my letters to MPs, seeking help, had been confiscated without myself or the intended recipients being notified!

I had even produced the previous owner of the Volvo, Mr B, at the police station with covering DVLA change of ownership document but, instead, was told, during ten visits to Bridgwater police station, the previous owner was not him.

Mr C, one of my intended recipients of my stopped prison letters by G45 run HMP Parc, unusually controlled by the South Wales Police, was also a witness to the unlawful seizure of my Citroen. This had followed the attempted fraud by a person known to the police present at the scene.