include: Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams
09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED
AN EXTRACT FROM THE PSYCHIATRISTS REPORT ON MAURICE KIRK
Dr’s wife, Dr Janis Hilliar
Her 2012 statement to the police re Maurice found, at the dead of night, at her home with a cans of petrol
Menage-a-trois Mr Eiffion Edwards
12 05 01 eiffion edwards statement
Caswell Clinic Ms Elisabeth Paul
Her eight MAPPA level 3 meetings notes
09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans (2)
10 12 7 MJK MAPPA Executive Summary09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED
Caswell Clinic Dr Ruth Bagshaw
Full file on Professor Rodger Wood’s spectacular findings
Caswell Clinic Dr Gaynor Jones
full Caswell brain-scan records castigating Dr TW and lying Wood
SWP retired liar Barbara Wilding
Her specific orders to kill me in order to preserve her pension
NHS (Wales) masonic Paul Jones
the obvious
NHS scavengers, Morgan Cole solicitors
17 07 01 12-12-13-morgan-cole-mjk-response
the vivid account by Dr Tegwyn Williams re police finding their victim , ‘in the dead of night, with cans of avgas lurking in a doctor’s garden’
Dolmans solicitor, Adrian Oliver
The overarching conspirator using doctors as porn (spelt right?)
police man, Mr David Vaughan
his orders not to disclose Visor/custody police records over 25 year period
ex CPS barrister, David Gareth Evans
and the rest not said by him in Bristol Crown Court
Crown Prosecutor Mr Killick
the full CPS files on machine-gun/MAPPA/ Caswell clinic conspiracy
Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University
Judge Richard Thomlow
Judge John Curran
just for ‘starters’
this list is far from exhaustive
Police led by Mr Frank Werren at Caswell Clinic in search of a suspected burglar out to steal his own medical records.
Maurice
You know very well at least half of those will not be permitted to attend and for very good reasons.
Of course, because after 6 years of persistence they are now proven bloody liars.
No. It’s because the issue you are fighting has already been decided
Your list of transcripts makes this clear – most state that there is no further appeal and your behaviour shows why. Producing items from your rectum in a manner such that your Mackenzie friend stands down isn’t likely to help your case.
Why don’t you concentrate on getting to Cape Town than wasting time on something you can’t win
Alas, Peter, my good willing McKenzie Friend, on 4th May 2010 1st restraining order jury trial, inadvertently ‘blew my case’ by retiring from the defence, in such a manner, just as the jury was asking for the obvious, in writing, for proof of there ever being a ‘restraining order’ served on me or made known to me, in the first place?
What I removed from my rectum were the only legal papers I could get smuggled past the stringent police orders, every time I am goaled, that I was to have no prior meeting with my proposed witnesses, little or no facilities in Cardiff prison and definitely no papers to assist me in any court.
Their routine was to try and blackmail me into using one of their lawyers, God forbid, as they had desperately tried over nearly 8 months on my remand in their MAPPA Tegwyn Williams machine-gun conspiracy trial.
With a proven police plant, that time, on the jury, nine told us in the pub after my acquittal, as well as sex changing police officers, as witnesses, all squabbling amongst themselves as to who could buy my arsenal of purported prohibited weapons?
Do you really believe if I had used a lawyer he or she would not have leaked my defences straight back to the CPS to modify their tactics? May I suggest you watch the Defence and CPS barristers’ masonic signs with the judge next time you are in a Cardiff Crown Court and you may learn a thing or two.
Amongst my much blood and faecal excrement I had extracted, per rectum, the appropriate defence section in law, Prevention of Harassment Act1997. The simple fact that Welsh courts, on each of my past three jury cases for the very same facts, so far, have all shied away from the obvious enquiry needed when one of their Cardiff cabal appears to again be ‘in some difficulties’.
May I suggest, Peter, you help me by reading the simple defence to ‘detect and to prevent crime’ that clears my name and comment, loudly . please, as to whether ‘I got it wrong’! Thankyou.