Her Honour Judge Tracy Lloyd Clark lied, without hesitation, when refusing to contribute any help at all concerning my crippling false medical report drafted and signed by the South Wales Police’s forensic psychiatrist.

A Bristol barrister tomorrow, for HM Crown Prosecution Service (England) in Exeter Crown Court at 10am or 10.30, is ‘put on notice’ to find the correct audit trail, as to when, where and by whom was I served a 1st December 2011 ‘restraining order’?

Handed down by a biased spineless Cardiff magistrate, who’s name I would rather forget, his malicious conduct has caused me, so far, five years of imprisonment.

Tomorrow’s Exeter Crown Court prosecutor will again be asked to disclose the correct audit trail of when, where and by whom was its ‘variation’ officially served on me, again, before my purported breaching it?

Tomorrow’s Exeter Crown Court hearing is to be asked as to where was the police’s justification in seizure of my medical and legal papers, together with my brand new wheel chair when I was unlawfully incarcerated on fabricated criminal convictions at HMP Parc, Bridgend,

South Wales Police fictitious convictions on OASys police/parole records included ‘child abuse’, firearms and narcotics’, gown, sold and even ingested !

Welsh Judge, Andrew Keiser, also refused my barrister’s request for seizure of my medical and legal records, stolen by G4S and now urgently required for my Taunton GP and his utterly corrupt handling of my one million pound ‘trading in machine gun’ 1CF03361 damages claim.

I was further gaoled in HMP Parc and Cardiff in 2019 for the alleged breach of our 2002 Anti-Terrorism legislation, allegedly sending some toothpaste to John Graham Esq and possible ‘heroin’ to the then Secretary of State for Wales. Alun Cairns MP.

John Graham flatly denies this and the welsh police refuse to disclose the alleged court exhibit, I suspect, as it never existed. Even CPS (England) refuse to lift a finger for the release of John Graham’s purported letters by me, return of my G4S stolen property or disclose a legible/ audible copy of my quite bizarre police interviews under caution for fear theymay be on this website withiin minutes if relaesed totheir MAPPA 3/3 victim diagnosed as unable to stand trial due to my worsening ‘Caswell Clinic diagnosed ‘significant brain damage.

JOHN GRAHAM LETTER TO HM MINISTRY OFJUSTICE

19 Dec. 2020
ref. no. 201127054

Dear Ministry of Justice,

Re: your 18 Dec. message to myself [below]: I am sorry, I sent my message to the wrong address.
You asked me  in your 10 / 12 / 2020 message to me “to clarify which information I am requesting”. Please see your message to me below, dated 10 / 12 / 2020.

I am trying to find out what’s happening regarding my FOIA [SAR] / DPA request regarding the letter to myself – allegedly having a “noxious substance” attached to it – that G4S / South Wales  police withheld from leaving HMP Cardiff in the May of 2019, authored by MAURICE. J. KIRK, d.o.b. 12 / 03 / 1945, whilst he was in HMP Cardiff on another matter.

The letter obviously exists as Mr. Maurice J. Kirk was remanded in custody in June 2019, for nearly 8 months because of this letter. The charge was later dropped by the CPS.

I request a copy of this withheld letter via my F.O.I.A. [SAR] / DPA request.

The South Wales police, the G4S prison security company, and subsequently the Information Commissioner’s Office refused to deal with my formal F.O.I.A. [SAR] / DPA asking for a copy of this letter.

The SWP told me – via a letter from a “J. JENKINS” of the SWP Dislosure Team [also attached] to request a copy of the withheld letter from the G4S company, who run HMP Cardiff, which I did, but they refused to deal with my formal F.O.I.A. request to them too. I complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office regarding both the SWP and G4S ignoring my FOIA request, but the I.C.O. refused to deal with my notifying them too, hence my writing to Mr. Buckland, the Sec. of State for Justice about it all.

My formal [ignored] F.O.I.A. request to HMP, and an identical request to G4S company, requesting a copy of this same withheld letter is attached also.
Your initial 04 December 2020 reply to me is attached also – with ref. no. 201127054, which contains my original F.O.I.A. request, ignored by all sent to.

Thank you,

Fortunately, for many unsuspecting members of the public, blindly believing neither lawyers nor doctors ‘can do no wrong’, that sacked NHS doctor was swiftly deported to New Zealand for the the protection of successive South Wales Chief Constables, left in his wake to defend the ever mounting civil claims, brought by so many, against those thinking themselves safe in their precious perverse Principality.

My facing ‘drug dealing’ charges, in supplying my then Conservative MP with Class A prohibited drugs, with ‘harmless unidentified ‘ white powder’ [ quote off CPS prosecution late documents] explains, perhaps why successive Queens Square Chambers, Bristol barristers having to drop indictments for jury trial as they also knew, possibly, my apparent ‘letter’, from me to John, the welsh police REFUSE to disclose, may have always been the figment of someone’s excessively fertile welsh twisted mind,

The very same welsh police, working in their prisons, know the allegations would not stand to the strict proof thereof as I was a registered ‘dangerous MAPPA victim but it took the Somerset and Avon Constabulary, accepting it had been embarrassingly duped, to have them quash the indictment to stop disclosure that could gaol so many police men and lawyers, featuring in this insulting episode, in positions of ‘privilege’

This also may explain why successive judges have sided with G4S Care and Custody Services Ltd, in their robbery on 1st November 2019, of my property needed in both current and future criminal and civil court proceedings when I have visited the individual homes of the culprits to carryout a ‘private persons arrest’ as local police refuse to investigate..

To new Christmas 2020 readers of my 20 year running internet blogs, to expose the welsh lies before the 2002 RCVS disciplinary enquiry, must understand that my driving force is also to simply to inform the bemused general public as to ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts and the level of depravity some welsh judges are prepared to stoop to when confronted with an English litigant who simply relies on trying to tell the truth.

The welch judiciary just hate it as it is generally at odds with the usual level of inherent deceit that so often percolates through its many officers of the Cardiff courts I have personally witnessed in almost thirty years of my life.

[My latter comment on ‘veracity’, alas, is now at risk of some degradation following horrific G4S and HMP Cardiff medical neglect, with 24/7 verbal abuse and human faeces and buckets of urine thrown into my HMP Parc isolated prison cell, last year.

This, together with severe G4S bullying resulting in hospital attention, the theft of my wheelchair and violent robbery by eight G4S staff, just to obtain for the Chief Constable, the stealing of my sensitive and privileged legal papers, has affected the state of my mind].

Keiser’s this week attempt to stop my one million pound ‘failed malicious machinegun conspiracy’ damages claim has now also taken its toll ].

WHERE ALL THIS NOW SOMERSET MATTER FIRST STARTED

I had had an invitation from Dr Gaynor Jones to visit Caswell Clinic for my 2009 concocted psychiatric reports, obtained by a police blackmailed doctor or else!

Instead, wicked Dr Roger Thomas countermanded the staff’s instructions to release my medical records for an impartial investigation, first with the English police and GMC and had me jaoled for ‘attempted burglary’!

My Machine gun trial ‘Mackenzie Friend’, Francis Werren and in centre of picture, not just witnessed the film prop ‘machine-gun’ being taken out of court, each afternoon during the trial, slung over an unaccompanied unarmed police officer’s shoulder, he was denied daily access in the court or prison by express orders of judge Paul Thomas.

G4S 1^st Nov 2019 Robbery of Legal and Medical Records    CASE NO: 1CF03361

& D00CF279

IN THE CARDIFF COUNTY COURT

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Claimant

and

CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES CONSTABULARY

Defendant

Reply to Defendant’s Position statement 22 January 2020

1. Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells appear to wish to be deliberately dishonest in material issues and so are asked to comment on transcript on 24 January 2020 on whether or not the Claimant has ‘significant irreversible brain damage’ or not? They contradict themselves.

2. Yet we need to decide the pace of proceedings based on how well or able is the Claimant’s health is to proceed with Lewis Gun case when Dr TW says in his reports to the Cardiff Crown Court in 2009 :-

“…My current preliminary position is that whilst Maurice Kirk is fit to plead, his difficulty in organising ……as a result of brain injury……..he would be unable to conduct his own defence”

Interim Report by Dr TW 30 September 2009 point 11

“Clinically it is unclear whether Maurice’s Kirk’s brain damage

is likely to progress. Should it do so his difficulties

will become more marked….”

Final Report by Dr TW 19 October 2009 point 34

3. Please would the Defendant explain to the Court on transcript as to what extent the Claimant has significant irreversible brain damage and is or is not medically fit to organise these civil cases unrepresented?

4. Please could Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells on transcript at Court 24 January 2020 explain the law (there are many such cases in the media) that if a victim of crime responds unwisely after criminal wrong is done to them. And so harasses the criminal who has done them horrific wrong. Does that mean the criminal is not longer guilty of the crime that it is clear, obvious and certain that they have committed? 

5. Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells raise whether Dr TW deliberately diagnosed the Claimant and regards whether Dr TW was medically qualified to interpret brain scans. As far as the Claimant is aware Dr TW has never been trained or become experienced in interpreting brain scans to report expert opinion to the Crown Court on those Neuro Radiology issues. Dr TW does not claim to be medically qualified in any area of Radiology his cv that emerges in various places.

6. If psychiatrist Dr TW is medically qualified and experienced to also be able work in a Radiology Department to interpret brain scans, please could Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells (on transcript) explain where and when Dr TW was trained in Radiology and Neuro-Radiology and then became adequately experienced in the interpretation of brain scans to report to the Crown Court as a medically qualified expert in Radiology?

7. Please would Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells explain when “two” Radiologists from Dr TW’s employer the ABMU NHS gave a normal all clear result on 28 August 2009 how could Dr TW possibly be entitled to hide that from the Cardiff Crown Court in September and October 2009 and how could he be justified in misleading the Cardiff Crown Court by giving false evidence to ay there was brain damage when asking for an extension of a loss of liberty by Mental Health Act Section?

8. The reply of Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells (or how they avoid answering to imply their know they are doing wrong) can be brought to the Chief Constable attention, because it is obviously not proper that the Chief Constable use dishonest officers or dishonest lawyers as they will damage the professional standards and reputation of South Wales Police.   

Malfeasance or similar by ‘Decisions of the Chief Constable’ in 2020

9. The Claimant must emphasise he needs time to take legal advice before sending a pre-action communications to the Chief Constable. The narrow careful issue regards Malfeasance (or a similar theme that lawyers will need to advise on) would be to seek a ‘Management Decision’ from the Chief Constable on whether he is going to make a Decision to stop and end, or allow to continue the deceit and dishonesty regards Dr TW and also false risk assessments in future prosecutions, police information systems and what the Defendant’s civil case lawyers or CPS use at Court.

Formal South Wales Police MAPPA Records are very different to NHS multi agency team assessment records which have informal notes of meetings 

10. Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells know that Seys Llewellyn QC made the decision to separate the earlier cases from the Lewis gun case. HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC was not sitting as a High court Judge and he did not make precedent in deciding issues regards formal South Wales Police MAPPA records as held by South Wales Police MAPPA Manager Mr Nigel Rees and controlled by various Chief Inspectors.

11. In total contrast and in what is controlled by different laws the NHS medium secure Caswell Clinic is an assessment centre that has an established multi agency Team approach (nurses, psychologists, doctors (junior), occupational therapists and social workers) to assess their patients. They have different records and systems to MAPPA but note what is said at MAPPA meetings. The NHS Caswell Clinic team notes include comment (by entries of someone possibly employed by the County Council) of very obvious serious wrongdoing by the Police Officer at a MAPPA meeting and the “Caswell Clinic team notes” of that Officers comments and motives are material in the Lewis Gun case.     

12. Regards Public Protection it is obvious the public need to be protected from the horrific wrongdoing by the South Wales Police Officer at the MAPPA meeting (and it was probably either DCI Suzanne Hughes or a Chief Inspector who is in a long term dispute with Claimant).

13. Mr Nigel Rees MAPPA Manager of South Wales Police has explained that MAPPA is to be accountable by addressing not what MAPPA says or decides but by using the process of accountability for the conduct of the individual professional using MAPPA.  

14. When the Judiciary tried to give immunity to Police in caselaw around 1995, Parliament immediately made that Judicial response as unlawful by the Police Act 1996 and Parliament saying in most clear terms that the Chief Constable is liable for what his officers do.

15. If there were to be a conflict of law here, that is overcome by the law regards MAPPA as PII to refuse Disclosure as a way protect a principle of a freedom of MAPPA to work in confidence. But as this information has already been disclosed and is in the public domain for years. The only laws that now apply after disclosure has occurred (and cannot possibly be reversed), is for an accountability process such as explained by Nigel Rees Head of MAPPA at South Wales Police, that each participant of MAPPA be held to account as an individual, and as that MAPPA participant was a police officer, Parliament has decided the Chief Constable should answer the allegations at a civil court.

Transfer to England is a correct process of law.  

16. It is a correct process that the civil case where police are the Defendant the case should not be heard within the geographical boundary of that police because:-

1. The Claimant is at substantial risk re-entering South Wales.

• That risk causes substantial stress to deteriorate the Claimant’s health and adversely affects his ability to concentrate on preparing for or attending his case at Court.

• There is conflict of interest in keeping the case in South Wales. The Claimant is supposed to report wrongdoing at Court or during proceedings to Police and if the case is now transferred out of Wales, or to where the Claimant now lives, where there is appropriate evidence, it is correct process of law for an outside police force can investigate the dishonesty of the Defendant and their lawyers in these civil cases.

Dr TW as co-defendant

17. There is a broader range of MAPPA information available and also an increasing obvious collusion between Dr TW and the Defendant still in 2019/20. Therefore it now seems clear to the Claimant that the prosecution of the Lewis Gun case could not have gained momentum without Dr TW facilitating it at MAPPA and his motives also appear malicious especially as he colludes dishonestly in the 2017 to 2019 prosecution case (to assist South Wales Police prevent the Claimant bring his civil claim). The Claimant believes Dr TW should be personally be a co-Defendant.  

18. As previously stated the Claimant seeks the Direction of the Court on how, following taking legal advice and using pre action communications with the Chief Constable, whether he should make a new claim in England (regards malfeasance or similar of the Chief Constable by not addressing in 2020 the ongoing threat and risk posed to the Claimant  by the continued malice and deceit of Police and Dr TW) and for the Claimant to ask the English Court to merge the Lewis Gun case to the English new claim. 

Court Orders to protect Claimant form esoteric dirty tricks by Defendant’s lawyers

19. It is a well known esoteric dirty trick of lawyers to move so very quickly that a lay Claimant cannot cope. And to use technical terms that a lay Claimant cannot be expected to follow. When the lawyer could easily add words that make what is said clear. The Claimant requests that deadlines be not as fast or unreasonable as Lloyd Williams and Christian Howells says as they aim to cause the Claimant to fail to put together his evidence and comply with Court Order in time. Also now the Claimant is out of prison evidence is still emerging and also witnesses are still potentially coming forward. The Claimant requests a pace that will allow him to have time and opportunity to gather and organise his evidence

Transcript of the 2009/10 Lewis Gun trial only more recently available while in prison needs to be available at Trial.

20. The Claimant request that the transcript of 2009/10 trail be made available at trial and to the jury trial.

Disclosure of MG6D evidence

21. MG6D is evidence that in 2009 helps the accused Claimant but harms the 2009 prosecution case. The defendants are hiding statement from the 2009 time of arrest and the Claimants requests Court Orders to Disclose them

22. However, the year previous HHJ Nicholas Chambers granted that the Chief Constable Barbara Wilding had to personally sign the Defendant’s affidavit that full Disclosure had occurred in the civil case. And the Claiming believes South Wales Police from that point in 2008 the year earlier then the 2009/10 Lewis Gun case, started work taking statements and preparing for a prosecution based on what they believed was a malicious prosecution and not true. The Claimant requests a Court Order to Disclose these early statements and evidence.    

23. The Claimant wishes the Court to note that after six weeks beyond the deadline the Defendant were refusing to comply with the Court Order to supply the affidavit personally sign by the Chief Constable for the serve so that the Claimant had attend Dolmans solicitors and refuse to leave until they gave him the signed affidavit. And so a firm use Court Order is needed on the Defendant  

Urgent – The Claimant’s doctor cannot get records form HMP Parc & Caswell

24. As a part of the obstruction that the Defendant influences the Claimant’s GP cannot get records from HMP Parc & Caswell Clinic. 

Urgent – Request Court Order regards Defendant prevents Return of Documents 

25. Working with Defendant at MAPPA the HMP Parc confiscated all the Claimants legal papers he had at the prison and they refuse to return them. Please could there be a Court Order for the return of the Claimants legal papers.    

Urgent – Request Court Order as Defendant still avoid the Claimant examining documents

26. From the reply by the Defendant, it is clear they have no intention of giving a time, date and location for the Claimant to examine Documents. Please could the Court Order a time and date with the location being a conference room at one of the Courts in Taunton.  

STATEMENT OF TRUTH

I believe that the facts stated in this application are true.

Maurice John Kirk BVSc

Date 23 January 2020

My plea for more prisoner witnesses or do I have to come in and find them for myself?