Professor Nicholas Read has written:-
“The conclusion that Maurice has brain damage was based on MRI evidence of a localised lack of perfusion in the right frontal lobe possibly caused by a brain tumour. This abnormality was no longer present when the scan was repeated. Brain scans are notoriously difficult to interpret and I am reminded that after trauma and during intense emotion the right frontal lobe can go off-line while victims may behave irrationally. In other words, it is likely that appearances of hypo-perfusion might come and go.”
Another observer’s point of view:
My understanding is that the factual version of events are more as follows :-
In August 2009 the Crown Court asked/Ordered that psychiatric evaluation and reports occur. The Caswell Clinic went further and specifically asked for an assessment to be done by Maurice being under what was, in the end, three one month Mental Health Act Sections to Caswell Clinic Wales’ ABM NHS in order for Maurice to be subjected to an intrusive medical procedure known as a SPEC scan requiring the use of radio isotopes intravenously.
On 28 August 2009 the Wales ABM NHS Caswell clinic transported Maurice down to the local ABM NHS Princess of Wales Hospital for a brain scan, the result of which was normal (please see attached both 28th Aug 09 reports).
09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans
That means ABM NHS records show, as of 28 August 2009, a brain scan result that there is no evidence to suggest Maurice has brain damage.
This was withheld from future courts where Maurice kept applying for bail concerning his being held on remand in Cardiff prison for the alleged trading in ‘machine-guns’ and being in possession of live ammunition.
Maurice, however and unbeknown to the authorities, had obtained such a report from within Cardiff prison via a certain ex MP’s wife for the Vale of Glamorgan also the son of a famous veterinary surgeon. This neuro-radiologist’s report had been sent to Cardiff Crown Court before his 2nd December 2009 bail application. He, in fact, did not know at the time this following report was already before his same court and in clear rebuttal to that what the police had submitted prior to the hearing.
This fact made the transcript of proceedings (attached below) even more significant.
9 12 1 medical Kemp
The doctor’s application, along with those of the then HM Crown Prosecutor for the ‘machine-gun’ allegations, listed to be heard on 25th January 2010, were heard ‘in chambers’ by the forced absence of Maurice and that he be further sectioned to Ashworth high security hospital for an indefinite period.
A RUMOURED COURT ORDER PREVENTS THE ESSENTIAL PUBLICATION OF 2ND DECEMBER 2009 CARDIFF CROWN COURT MACHINE-GUN T20097445 TRANSCRIPT ON THIS WEB SITE INCLUDING THOSE UNLAWFULLY REDACTED PORTIONS ORDERED BY THE CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEAL FOR THEIR RELEASE.
Maurice has never been informed, to this day, of either the police or HM Prosecutor, Richard Thomlow’s findings from his 28th August 2009 NHS (Wales) brain scans. He has been goaled more than once, since, for arguing with Cardiff judges to order the release of that medical information used in an attempt by the South Wales Police to have their victim locked up without the need for a jury trial.
Furthermore all subsequent brain scan results since the one in Texas USA, in 2008, Brittany in 2002, HMP Swansea in 2014 and Cardiff in 2017, all say the same, that of normal findings.
Caswell Clinic Medical Records Leak REDACTED
Maurice’s HMP Swansea 2014 medical records reveal that the South Wales Police not only blocked his urgently needed endoscopy under general anaesthesia, not once but twice but also the prison’s psychiatrist, Dr Seely’s recommendation of the immediate need of a neurologist. HMP Swansea’s Dr recorded his opposing any follow-up examinations or his release from prison to an outside hospital despite his and CPS’s fear of a brain tumour.
Maurice still awaits Dr Seely’s report from the neurologist after realising the ‘gross variance’, putting it politely, of the South Wales Police MAPPA records of their victim compared to that of what barrister Griffiths was to refer to in the civil court, on behalf of the Justice Ministry, no less, after the 12th September criminal, T20170239.
14 11 06 Medical Update
A sample Cardiff Court erroneous FOI and DATA PROTECTION ACT supplied records
So how did police say as a certainty in his October 2009 report and at Crown Court on 2 December 2009 that Maurice has significant irreversible brain damage?
Why do the police not simply correct his reports to just say an update is there that there is no brain damage?
Why Does the police continue to allow forensic reports with incorrect information to be sent, today, to authorities far afield as to include USA, France, Guernsey, the Civil Aviation Authority and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons?
WHO allowed the South Wales Police to send fabricated reports to FTAC in January 2009, IAG South Wales Police HQ on 1st June 2009, level 3 MAPPA (South Wales Police) Barry police station meeting on 8th June 2009, the CIA in Texas USA in August 2009, the Metropolitan Police in 2011, and both the French Breton police and Maurice’s trial judge, in his extended civil damages proceedings against them, in 2013?
Why does the South Wales Police continue sending his reports to the Crown Prosecution Service for four criminal jury trials, so far and arranged in Cardiff despite Maurice’s argument of ‘a real risk of bias’?
So, why then were two trials convened in Cardiff in 2012, the 3rd in 2014 and now the 4th in 2017 and possible 5th alleged ‘breach of a restraining order’ prosecution next year without a complainant, allowing the South Wales Police to continue harassing their victim with the guarantee of immunity to any likelihood of receiving a civil or criminal prosecution in Wales?
1st October 2009 Cardiff Crown Court Incident
This earlier first page of a September 2009 letter from Professor Read was read out to a Cardiff Crown much to my anger but notice the official transcript of those days of proceedings makes to mention of it or the appropriate comments made to the judge by my then MacKenzie Friend, Norman Scarth Esq, before he, also, was ejected from the court by His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC
In the recent Cardiff criminal trial for Maurice’s alleged 4th breach of a restraining order, never served in the first place, Professor Nicholas Read had travelled from Sheffield just to give specialist evidence based on his many decades within the medical profession.
After his witnessing the refusal of other key witnesses and supporting defence medical documentation, that had been rejected by the court in advance, he left.
Some in the public gallery could not but notice, however, the NHS (Wales) doctor on the jury reminding them of the obvious police plant on the 2010 machine-gun jury when nine of them complained about such a charade so bitterly.
Fast Moving Consequences from a verdict now on Appeal
Civil Claim C90CF012 arising from South Wales Police Fabricated MAPPA Records
It was ,therefore, of no surprise to us in Cardiff’s county court for another judge, on the next working day, in his handing down his ‘strike -out’ judgment in less than three minutes.
Maurice’s civil claim for damages against police, parole board and Ministry of Justice for them, jointly, to cause the doubling of his prison term, simply by denying him any defence witnesses or any English based psychiatrist to be sitting on the parole hearing.
This scandal all originated, apparently, from the supposed belief NHS (Wales) doctors, Metters, Aisling Butler, Gaynor Jones, Ruth Bagshaw, S Jones and manyy others in Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd hospital had their diagnosis quite wrong while not forgetting those further afield, unlikely to shred the damaging records in the current circumstances, now such relevant records of fraud are being gathered together for the Criminal Court of Appeal.
These included psychiatrists and other specialist doctors, in the field, have also been quite unnecessarily dragged in to this utter abuses of process, so far, Dr Silva in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, court ordered psychiatrist from Bristol, another couple in a Tottenham police cell and its magistrates court in London, in Austin, Texas, State Psychiatric Hospital, USA, in Juba’s malaria hospital South Sudan, in HMP Cardiff psychiatrist’s department, in HMP Swansea and HMP Park.
Dr Kemp, neuro radiologist of Southampton University, went further and openly castigated the need for an intrusive SPEC scan purely concocted by the thoroughly deceitful Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University.
Even, more recently, for the third time in Pontivy France, while Maurice was receiving further specialist treatment for his carcinogenic police induced lesions, the doctor examined the original welsh fabrications yet again ultimately controlled by the Ministry of Justice MAPPA level 3 category 3 fabricated forensic history.
MAPPA forensic history fraudulently supplied by a vindictive and deceit riddled South Wales police force protected, time and again, by a judicial system also seeking autonomy from London and just about guaranteed now the thoroughly damaging Brexit looms.
Barrister Griffiths of Cardiff, defending the HM Ministry of Justice in the civil hearing stated that the 3rd March 2014 Dr Rose Marnel medical report, above, supported his welsh MAPPA medical records as being correct or did he mean London’s
SO, MAURICE’S WELSH MAPPA 3/3 RECORDS HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT ALL THIS TIME!
Were all these professionals ‘ interpretations on this ‘victim of the State’, having been subjected to five peri-venous leaks, already, of inappropriate laboratory guinea pig tests with radio isotopes, all getting it wrong?
No wonder The Recorder of Cardiff, Her Honour Judge Eleri Rees and Her Honour Judge Tracy Lloyd Clarke, refused all defence witnesses or allow the set of relevant defence exhibits, especially prepared by a barrister, to go before the last month’s jury.
For an NHS (Wales) doctor to sit on the jury was also predictable after the plant on the machine-gun trial fiasco being so quickly identified by the remainder of the jury BUT which one was the other, had Maurice barred the doctor from taking part?
|Claimant’(s) name(s) and address(es) including postcode
MAURICE JOHN KIRK BVSc
|Defendant’(s) name and address(es) including postcode
1. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE
102 Petty France, London
2. PAROLE BOARD FOR ENGLAND AND WALES
52 Queen Anne’s Gate,
London SW1H 9AG
3. South Wales Police (added as the 3rd Defendant once it was realised the claim rested on the South Wales Police, the latter acting on behalf of the Chief Constable to an attempt to also snuff out any other civil claims arising from collateral damage caused by the outcome of His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC’s 2nd December & 17th December 2009 hearings having Maurice’s MAPPA level 3 category 3 registration expunged from the court records).
The South Wales Police, following appropriate disclosure of their records will indicate the then Chief Constable had other ideas on how to illuminate her problem over pension rights.
1CF03361 ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy blocked, so far , for eight years needed to also quashed at source.
|Brief details of claim
Damages for misfeasance in a public office and/or unlawful imprisonment and/or under section 8(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 for wrongful and/or unlawful imposition of licence conditions under section 244 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and/or the Criminal Justice (Sentencing) (Licence Conditions) Order 2005 dated on or about 4 July 2014, in breach of article 10(1) ECHR as incorporated under schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and/or the Treaty on European Union, and/or wrongful and/or unlawful revocation of licence under section 254 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 on 11 July 2014, and/or subsequent unlawful detention and/or imprisonment and/or failing to make arrangements for an oral hearing before the Parole Board with all due expedition and/or failing to provide the said oral hearing eventually set for hearing on 4 February 2015 in respect of his release from custody, in breach of article 5 of the ECHR as incorporated under schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 and/or under the principles set out in R. (Haney, Kaiyam and Massey v. Secretary of State for Justice; R. v. Robinson v. Governor of HMP Whatton and Secretary of State for Justice  UKSC 66 until the Claimant’s final release from HMP Swansea on 28 March 2015.
Damages for HMP Cardiff’s withholding of the Claimant’s passport in order to prevent his retrieving legal papers.
Damages limited to £1000,000
|You must indicate your preferred County Court Hearing Centre for hearings here (see notes for guidance)
|County Court at Bristol
|Defendants’ name and address for service including postcode
|1. Secretary of State for Justice,
Government Legal Department,
One Kemble Street,
2. Parole Board for England and Wales,
52 Queen Anne’s Gate,
First that was needed was to be quash by swift summary conviction was Maurice’s clearly embarrassing claim on his own government due to the Welsh authorities stubbornness in simply refusing to have ministry of Justice to amend the South Wales Police MAPPA records of Maurice Kirk immediately. The original seriously erroneous medical records are still available for any further black mail by the current South Wales Police Chief Constable, Robert Vaughan.
Unless, of course, common sense prevails between now and the 17th November 2017 Cardiff Crown Court hearing for a judge to order an in depth enquiry and immediately orders the CPS to produce its evidence of the rogue MAPPA records blighting Maurice’s life.
No wonder both The Recorder of Cardiff, Her Honour Eleri Rees and trial judge, Her Honour Judge Tracy Lloyd Clarke, refused all relevant defence witnesses and defence exhibits especially prepared by a leading criminal barrister.
Of course, that would leave any jury in the UK with not a chance of believing such an incredible story of high level deceit being metered out to an Englishman only wishing he had never crossed the old Severn Bridge, in 1992, in the first place.