I visited Suzon twice in Cambridge, after she somehow entered my e-life, and I cherished her fine mind and political creativity.
For Maurice, she had produced a most magnificent legal document with respect to his Caswell Clinic assessment and the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons who are immune to prosecution – thanks to the Royal Charter that she studied most extensively. The College received their Charter in 1967.
Eventually I knew what she was working on and I am happy to publish the documents that she had sent me; especially as I received one that I hadn’t seen before: an Affidavit as sworn, that she wrote with respect to a case in a Florida Court where The Society of Lloyd’s complained against one Karl Aronson. Here is the text, in which she makes a few remarkable points – in the paragraphs with the number mentioned:
13. The assumption is that those in power can do no wrong.
17. When the interests of the Queen and any part of her elite government are at risk, only one outcome is acceptable. Legal proceedings in English courts are therefore driven to that outcome by fair means or foul.
18. White collar crime, with very rare exceptions, goes untried and unpunished in English law.
26. Judges are covered by Crown immunity in all their actions. Barristers cannot be sued for negligence. Geoffrey Robertson QC, a barrister with 25 years experience stated in regard to this immunity (1999): “…barristers are well paid and immune to actions for negligence…They cling to their immunity from actions for negligence – an unjustified privilege which protects incompetents from being sued.”
28. Money decides legal matters.
54. English civil law was “too expensive, too slow, too unequal, too uncertain, too fragmented and–to many–incomprehensible.
Attitudes Towards European Law
56. 1996 the then Lord Chancellor, James Mackkay, Baron Mackay of Clashfern, journeyed to Strasbourg, France, to ask the European Court of Human Rights to respect the right of British courts to manage their own affairs “in full recognition of their national character, traditions, religious beliefs, and moral standards.”
Secret Government Vetting of Jurors
No Requirement to Report or Investigate Perjury
Transcripts Modified to Prejudice Appeals
Destruction of Evidence
Grand Juries Abolished
Plea Bargaining Unknown
Some Recent Opinions
79. Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, delivered a fierce attack on the commercial legal system at Mansion House. Mr. King said
the adversarial system for settling civil legal disputes was in reality ‘a profitable monopoly of lawyers’ and called for the Government to take steps to reform the law.
80. In a recent Times interview, Robert Wardle, director of the Serious Fraud Office, warned that the police and prosecution authorities trying to combat fraud are struggling. In a letter to the Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, QC, Wardle said in his annual report: “There remains a gap between the incidence of fraud and the number of investigations, let alone prosecutions…I am not suggesting that the justice gap can be closed–merely narrowed.” At present, he told The Times, “frauds are going uninvestigated and unprosecuted” (my emphasis).
81. It is my carefully considered opinion given with all due respect, based upon personal experience and knowledge, that English courts are not fair and impartial tribunals where things get put right. English courts are corrupt forums based on unwarranted privilege which perversely excuse and conceal the gravest misconduct.
Here’s what Charles Wehner wrote about her:
All who love freedom must shed a precious tear.
We have lost Suzon Forscey-Moore, a glorious fighter for justice.
She had a masters degree in law, but was not a lawyer. She campaigned for HONEST LAW.
She is gone.
The world is darker now.
Charles Douglas Wehner