WHAT REALY GOES ON IN OUR ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE

INTERIM ARTICLE for those following the wickedness of some in the South Wales Police now moving to the London law courts

. The MUSA article is to warn others our judiciary is not as it hopes to appear to be — I invite you to follow my route throughout the RCJ and European courts, over the next 5 years, all due to ‘devil worship’ rituals in Cardiff s law courts as it must always take precedent to the’ rule of law’ and the truth.

GOING BACK IN TIME [2011]: Fwd: MUSA BIG FILE Fw: FAO PAUL GARLICK QC

ExternalInbox

look what i found: from 2011:- hunger strike in HMP by someone called “Maurice Kirk”, Highbury Corner court, …and more victimisation and corruption.
ps the QC wrote to didn’t reply. Typical. Nobbled probably.

From: butlincat . <adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk>
Sent: 24 December 2011 23:50
To:clerks@furnivallaw.co.uk <clerks@furnivallaw.co.uk>
Cc: butlincat . <adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: FAO PAUL GARLICK QC Dear Mr. Garlick,
This letter is from myself, John Graham, one of many supporters, friends and a Mckenzie friend to the Nigerian Musa family, before being evicted of Haringey, N. London.

I am writing hoping you can help as the situation since you parted from the case has dwindled down to a completely unacceptable position with the Musas now imprisoned since 31 Oct., having lost now 6 children on totally bogus allegations. During the week beginning the 31 Oct. a 6 day hearing effectively removed the baby, the 6th child, on evidence given to the court that can only be described as utter perversions of justice and lies. Injunctions forbid me as Mckenzie friend from relating the lies told to get the baby removed from the Musa parents.

I am am asking if you can please reinstate yourself into the case again to assist the Musas in their time of peril. They have never had adequate representation from the numerous solicitors and connected theyve previously had and even they are expressing their request for help in their letters from prison to supporters. So many from the legal profession are loathe to help them because of the actions Haringey council take upon these people trying to represent Musa, such that they are frightened off via various methods. Musa can elaborate more on this part of it and id rather he did.

One aspect of this case that is hardly ever mentioned is the appalling witness intimidation targetted at the Musas witnesses. I do not joke or hoax when i say i have met and spoken to at least 5 witnesses who have been strongly affected by Haringey council because of their supporting the Musas. Please take the time to read the affadavit of Kay Young {below}, who had to flee the UK because of this dubious councils social workers intended actions towards her. Another witness had to spend 4 months in an illegal alien detention centre on totally bogus evidence. Other witnesses, single mothers, have had their children removed, or had it threatened. All this is absolutely true.

If you can help the Musa family please could you let me know and I can take the appropriate steps to try and get the ball rolling. The Musas have a commital to crown court hearing on the 28th Dec. at Highbury Corner magistrates court. My site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com tells of their story recently, with supporter Maurice Kirk actually going on hunger strike in Cardiff prison as part of his protest as to what has/is happening to the Musas. My site explains also the disappearance of Favour Musa, and her being sexually abused whilst in care. The letters i sent to the chief constable {attd.} + police, MPs + other “authority figures” about this matter has never received a satisfactory response or even a reply in the Chief Con’s case. It seems sexual abuse on a minor is allowable by the police, MPs + others written to too. It is appalling. Letters were sent to Theresa May and others by recorded delivery royal mail too about this abuse but still no reply has ever been recived. I have sent hundreds of emails to MPs + similar, as others have, to meet with a stony silence and no response whatsoever. I think it is quite apparent to some supporters who have investigeted this child seizing in the UK via mothers who have had children removed by councils {Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek,Eve Pears, + many more} that a child seizing network is in place which could very well cater for a paedophile network, either here or abroad.

Incidentally Maurice Kirk – pls see his site www.kirkflyingvet.com – was arrested again on totally trumped up charges after giving evidence for the Musas at the bail app. hearing on Thursday 22 Dec., although the 2 events are only indirectly connected, Maurice having an injunction upon him to never communicate with the Musas. The police know what Maurice is capable of as his 20 year battle with the corrupt elements within the S Wales authorities show, and they will silence him at all costs. As i said he just spent 68 days on hunger strike in Cardiff prison before being released a couple of weeks ago. Whilst in Cardiff prison he was beaten badly by the prison officers, and the attempts to section him, a common ploy placed upon him in the past, was luckily unsuccessful. His many phone calls describing his treatment etc are on my wordpress site mentioned.

Please help if you can.

Thanks for your time and happy solstice.

J. Graham.
——————————————————————-
Affadavit from Kay Young:
STATEMENT FROM Kay Young 26 5 11
Witness “A” statement:
Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:18:10 +0100
I first became aware of this family’s plight when I received an e-mail asking me if I could assist the family. I made contact with Bishop Gloria – who – understandably – did not trust anyone. I then met her on 24 November in London (St Marks Hospita) after I had attended a Hospital appointment. This was the first time I spoke to her Social Worker, JOYCE AGYEKUM, who appeared to not understand Bishop Gloria (I had no problems understanding Gloria). I took the mobile from Bishop Gloira and started to talk to Ms Agyekum as I felt there were difficulties regarding ‘Contact arrangements between Bishop Gloria and the children’. I introduced myself as ‘Kay’ on the telephone to her (Ms Agyekum) and reminded her in accordance with the Children Act 1989 the LBH (London Borough of Harringey) had a duty to promote contact in the ‘best interests of the child/ren’. Ms Agyekum hung up on me. Bishop Gloria came to my home, with her husband a few days later (on a Saturday); I felt because she did not trust me, she may start to if she were to come to my home for the evening with her husband.
As a decent human being I could not allow to see a decent, innocent, law-abiding family have their children taken away and that was the reason I decided to (try) and help them. The reason for this was because in 1994, I had my daughter taken into the care of HERTFORDSHIRE SOCIAL SERVICES, whereby they committed FRAUD, NON-FEASANCE, MALFEASANCE, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, MISREPRESENTATION, PERJURY… all of which I intend to put before the Court of Human Rights. I did not want to see this family suffer as I had and have for many years. All I had asked for was help for my child who I suspected had been sexually abused by her father, who, incidentally is ALSO one of the people who ABUSED ME when I was younger and whom the POLICE now (2011) REFUSE to take up my case for ‘historic abuse’ – telling me it is ‘out-of-date’, which is a LIE!
I knew when I became involved with the family more that MY OWN family were being put at risk, as there are many families within Harringey who have either had their children taken into care (I know of only one who has had the child returned), or been threatened to have a child/ren taken into care, been moved away from the family out of the area and/or ‘disappeared’. I have had to move away from the UK to protect my own child. I have (attempted) to submit an Urgent Judicial Review application against JUDGE GLENN BRASSE’s decision 1) not to investigate allegations of sexual abuse of one of the children from this family and b) Ignoring Three EPO’s I have applied for and one which I applied for in St Albans (Hertfordshire, UK) Courts. I have experiences, first hand, the arrogance of Joyce Agyekum, who obviously believes she is above the law (she committed purjery in Court,e FEBRUARY 2011 – which can be proven).

I would like to add my comments also. JUDGE GLENN BRASSE acknowledged in February that ALL the ‘original’ allegations against the family WERE FALSE and is set on record (at least it should be on record at the Court House) that “Social Services in Harringey can make whatever claims they want to, regardless of whether or not they are found to be true or false”. He has also IGNORED a number of EPO’s (Emergency Protection Orders, in accordance with the Children Act 1989) which I have submitted, and at one time physically handed to an Usher at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch Court, London.
I am now attempting to submit an URGENT JUDICIAL REVIEW, but am having difficulties and NO ONE seems to know where I should be submitting the form and if they do, I do NOT have an e-mail address where to send it. If you can help, please provide me with the e-mail where I send it. I have also made it clear and will state here, I DO suspect in submitting the Judicial Review application, that my life, AND anyone close to me (friend AND/OR family) MAY be at serious risk of harm by ANY AUTHORITIES / Organisations / Public Body/ies. I have already had an allegation made by the UK Social Services to the Irish Social Services Department for concern about my mental health. There is much more to what has and IS happening to me at the moment for helping this family – in short: I have lost everything. The ‘apparent’ Social Worker who came to see me called herself ‘Runya Mupfambati’ – I found out later she was NOT AUTHORISED to work with Hertfordshire County Coucil Social Services Department because she was registered as working in LONDON – I suspect a direct link to Harringey somewhere. Joyce Agyekum is REGISTERED as working in HERTFORDSHIRE, but it seems – is still involved with the family in question. Runya – is actually Runyararo Editor Mupfambati (as I have been informed by the GSCC – General Social Care Council)
I have been informed by the GSCC the following:
1. ALL Social Workers have to be registered with the GSCC to call themself a ‘Social Worker’.
2. The name on their badge/s has TO BE THE SAME as the name they are registered under.
3. They have to register under the AREA / Authority, they work for – if they don’t they have no authority working in that particular area/ Location / Town / Borough etc.,
Surely, Judge Brasse would have known this? As he was not allowing Mr Musa and Bishop Gloria at one time to be given legal advice (unless it was by Solicitors he suggested) on the grounds that ‘they would not be registered and answerable if not registered’.
Gloria Musa (the mother of the Children) has been featured many times in The Telegraph by Christopher Booker. When I first got involved with this family / befriended them, I was sent alot of ‘anonymous’ e-mails; that is I did not know how whoever sent them to me, got my e-mail address (land e-mail address). She is not a Prostitute – someone who originally reported it to SOCIAL SERVICES (and works for a CHARITY CALLED CARIS, in Harringey) has stated in the Court proceedings in February that it was “only a joke”, or something very similar to those words. Former Eastenders Actress – Michelle Collins – has also played a major part in the case because she has also given false representation / evidence and in February also stated she did not mean it to be ‘nasty’, as it was all meant as a ‘joke’. This family are NOT UK Nationals.
I was due to submit a Statement before the Court on Friday, 25th February 2011 and give evidence on the Monday 28th February. Unfortunately, the person was an advocate for the family had been ‘discharged from Court’ and I knew – at some stage I would be put directly in the firing line for assisting this family. What I mean by ‘firing line’ is this: earlier in February, I had given my FULL NAME (I had told them my name was either ‘Kay’ or ‘Ms Young’ before. I had also complained about the local Police Force (as mentioned herein) with regard to them taking up an Historic abuse case. I also had ‘problems with being bullied at my sons school, and had complained; on 18th February I realised Social Services may come back to my home at some stage should the School contact them – which the school did. Judge Glenn Brasse suggested to the Mother that she submit a complaint. Myself and Bishop Gloria Musa went along to HARRINGEY SOCIAL SERVICES to do so and were obstructed to submit a complaint by the staff there on duty. The duty staff were Ms JUNE McKENZIE (Manager of Children and Families) and Ms TRACEY DAVIES, (Social Worker – Children and Families) for Harringey Social Services – Ms McKenzie took Ms Davies OUT of the room at one point to (in Ms McKenzies words ‘diffuse the situation’ – as at one point, Ms Davies looked like she was going ‘to go’ for me – in other words, looked like she may get up and physically assault me). THIS conversation CAN BE PROVED…. As I understood, Judge Brasse had requested the children we re-united with the family (21 February), but by the end of the week he had changed his mind for some apparent reason (not known to me). He even asked Joyce Agyekum a time scale the children could be re-united with their family – she requested (I believe) 2012, to which he had stated it was ‘not good enough’ and he requested a shorter time-scale.
A large number of Social Workers / POLICE (to name but a few Annie Walker – Mngr Ch and F, Maria Foster – Mngr, Ch and F, Joyce Agyekum – Social Worker (SW), Alexandra Constantinou (SW), Rositta Moise, Solicitor (London Borough of Haringey’s Solicitor – who incidentally was NOT on the Law Society’s register). POLICE within Harringey who have been /ARE involved with the family: Sargeant KADIRI, PC Christie, PC Caswell, DC Nagra and DS Cara Barton – I have no doubt there would be more. I spoke to someone called MOJI Word twice on her mobile phone in December 2010 – she was ‘running for Presidency’. She thanked me for helping the family as she IS A personal friend. She also stated that the Police within Harringey dropped the case against Mr Musa and Bishop Gloria after she had spoken to them (she spoke to the Police in Harringey).
I have also submitted a complaint to the ‘Office for Judicial Complaints’ who – at one time, informed me the Judge in question had RETIRED! I found his name on the list of ‘Circuit Judges’ and corrected them…. Given Mr Hales works in such an office, he should be aware of who is and is not still a Judge!!
The LITTLE GIRL, aged 10 years old, is BEING SEXUALLY ABUSED in care and NO ONE seems to want to do anything to help her (that is if she is still alive as she has not been seen for a number of MONTHS and NO ONE is granted either telephone contact with her or any other form of contact. After the (referred to as ‘F’ for now) 10 year old, had told her mothre at a CONTACT SESSION that she had been abused by the FOSTER PARENTS SON, I submitted the first EPO. I have attempted to submit another EPO yesterday, Wednesday, but because of where I am at the moment, I have limited time to search for the relevant e-mail address. I am having to rely on a library PC at the moment and the ‘good will’ of the staff here, which I have to say, has been excellent – after I explained to them what I have been doing and about the injustice of the case. I STILL HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS FOR THE WELL-BEING of the 10 year old little girl
If ANYONE would like any further information, please feel free to contact me at this e-mail address; I am unable to give a land e-mail address as since I have been in IRELAND, my benefits from the UK have been and ARE seriously being interferred with by ‘authorities’ and I am therefore, not getting any money at the moment. I have been living off CHURCH FOOD VOUCHERS given by the Church here and have had one ‘back-dated’ payment which has paid the rent and enabled me to buy my young child a new, decent pair of shoes. Given the nature of this case and as I am living in Ireland, I am also copying Ming Flanagan, who is the current Mayor of County Roscommon.
The Judiciary in the UK is corrupt and I will be submitting my own (past) case with evidence to the European Courts of Human Rights – rather than use the procedures for the UK Judicial system. PLEASE HELP EXPOSE the corruption within the UK Judiciary that this family have had to experience.
I trust this clarifies some of the details about the family. I AM NOT AND HAVE NEVER had any ‘Orders’ against me NOT to speak about the case AND INFORMATION shared within this e-mail has been divulged to me by various sources.
Yours sincerely
B.A & B.Sc (Hons) OPEN
I am also copying, for information only, to Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP, who was my Local MP when I lived in the UK, as I have kept him informed regarding the case, since October 2010.
Copy also sent to Mr Paul Randle-Jolliffe who was the Advocate representing the family in February and who was extradited from Court – as referred to above.
CC: includes Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP – For information only
Sam Hallimond – for Information only
Ming Flanagan – current Mayor of County Roscommon,, Ireland
PLEASE NOTE: ALL CLAIMS MADE WITHIN THIS E-MAIL CAN BE PROVEN… There is tape-recorded evidence to substantiate ALL allegations made. If there is any part of this you – anyone – would like clarification of, please do not hesitate to contact me

——————————————————————————————–
6, 7, 9 sept letters to prin reg holborn
To whom it may concern,

Having called the Principle Registry this afternoon Friday 9 Sept. 2011 on phone numbers 020 79477939 at 16.31 BST, my call was hung up without notice, followed by a further call to number 02079476020 at the same address at 16.39 when i was hung up upon again, I finally rang 02079 477922 at again the same addressed to be told that there was no one there to take my call.
During the first call a young lady there told me that London councils can renew Interim Care Orders by phone, which was going to be the subject of my phone call had I been able to speak with anyone. I duly pointed out I had put in my emails the law which states otherwise – that ICO’s were not allowed to be issued if the parents had objected and were not present at the court hearing – as was the case when the MUSA parents were not present in the court when this ICO was issued on the 5 Sept. 2011, and the said ICO was therefore null and void that was supposedly “issued” by judge Hess, the notification received by the MUSA family by judge BERRY IN THE LATE AFTERNOON, AS MY RESUME DESCRIBES BELOW IN THE EMAILS UNANSWERED BY YOURSELVES.

I am concerned at the lady on the phone saying that ICOs are issued FOR LONDON COUNCILS IF THE PARENTS CONCERNED ARENT PRESENT, and although she claimed to be an “admin clerk”, this indeed is a serious statement of how this court works. I have solid evidence to prove this was said and what ive described occurred in its entirety.

Thank you,

J. Graham
——————————————————————————–
From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
To: mark.barford@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; lorraine.morichelli@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; dave.woods@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; admin@number10.gov.uk; pickles@communities.gsi.gov.uk; picklese@parliament.uk; supportline@victimsupport.org.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; lammyd@parliament.uk; ruffleyd@parliament.uk; prfd.privatelaw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; lee.grubb@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; camerond@parliament.uk; andrew@andrewgeorge.org.uk
Subject: FW: CASE NO FD10C00195 – THE MUSA FAMILY ANDTHE ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF THEIR 5 CHILDREN
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:27:31 +0100

Dear Sir / Madam,
Further to my email dated 6 9 11 below can you please tell me exactly what action you intend to take about:
a} the illegalities involved – the ICO being issued contrary to the standard guidelines set within British law,
b} the children now removed under a null and void order – are they to be returned as no legal ICO is in place as is their right?
and
c} what is to be done about the persons who partook in the actions of issuing a meaningless and irregular Interim Care Order, in respect of those persons not acting responsibly and allowing such an ICO to be issued?
I may add this is the 4th time such an ICO has been issued, without the objecting parents being at the hearing which is their right according to British law.
This case – no. FD10C00195 – is not only causing a lot of unnecessary distress to the parents and more than likely their children since the irregularities began on the 8 April 2010, brought about by government employees who seem set on working outside the law, but is also wasting a huge amount of taxpayers money in the process. No wonder there are silencing orders in place whereby the misdeeds and crimes that have been committed are kept from public scrutiny.
It is an outright disgrace that things are allowed to continue by those put in office that are supposed to monitor and stop and correct such irregularities and crimes.

Thank you.

J. Graham.

From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk)
Sent: 06 September 2011 11:22:03
To: mark.barford@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; lorraine.morichelli@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; dave.woods@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; admin@number10.gov.uk; pickles@communities.gsi.gov.uk; picklese@parliament.uk; supportline@victimsupport.org.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; lammyd@parliament.uk; ruffleyd@parliament.uk; prfd.privatelaw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; lee.grubb@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk; camerond@parliament.uk

MUSA FAMILY ANDTHE ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF THEIR 5 CHILDREN
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:22:03 +0100

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,

CASE NO FD10C00195 – THE MUSA FAMILY AND THEIR 5 CHILDREN.

Concerning an Interim Care Order issued yesterday 5 September 2011 regarding the 5 children belonging to the MUSA parents GLORIA and CHIWAR MUSA at the
Principle Registry of the Family Division, Holborn, London
this is an official complaint regarding the proceedings involving judge HESS, judge BERRY and all others concerned whereby an Interim Care Order was issued outside of British law at the above court.
It is understood JUDGE BERRY informed the MUSA parents GLORIA and CHIWAR MUSA of an ICO being issued via a telephone conversation between HARINGEY COUNCIL and a certain JUDGE HESS. Seeing as the MUSA parents objects to this ICO being issued, and had notified the correct people of their objections, for this ICO to be issued in their absence renders the said ICO null and void.

MAY I POINT OUT BRITISH LAW, IN THAT IT IS ILLEGAL TO ISSUE AN ICO IF THE PARENTS HAVE OBJECTED AND ARE NOT IN THE COURT FOR THE ISSUANCE HEARING. THE PARENTS HAD OBJECTED AND THESE CHARACTERS HARINGEY COUNCIL, JUDGE HESS, AND JUDGE BERRY HAVE PERVERTED THE COURSE OF TRUE JUSTICE BY ISSUING THE ORDER AND MUST BE HELD RESPONSIBLE. THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME AN ICO HAS BEEN ISSUED ILLEGALLY REGARDING THE MUSA CHILDREN, THE PARENTS NOT BEING PRESENT, HAVING OFFICIALLY RAISED OBJECTIONS AND FOLLOWING THE CORRECT PROCEDURE FOR SUCH OBJECTIONS.
THE PARENTS HAD BEEN AT THER COURT READY FOR THE HEARING WITH RELAVENT DOCUMENTS AT THE OPENING OF THE PREMISES IN THE MORNING ONLY TO BE TOLD JUST BEFORE IT CLOSED OF THIS ICO BEING ISSUED CONTRARY TO BRITISH LAW. IT IS DISGRACEFUL THAT THESE JUDGES, SUPPOSEDLY KNOWING THE LAW GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE OF THE SAID INTERIM CARE ORDERS COULD ACT IN THIS WAY, THE LAWS GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE BEING:

Rule 28 of the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 SI
1991/1395 which provides;

“A justice’s clerk or single justice shall not make an
order under section 11(3) or section 38(1) unless –
(a) A written request for such an order has been made to
which the other parties and children’s guardian consent
and which they or their representatives have signed;
(b) A previous such order has been made in the same
proceedings; and
(c) The terms of the order sought are the same as those of the last such
order made.”

The parents have consistently stated in writing that they do not agree to the
orders being renewed which means postal renewal cannot lawfully happen,
there must be a hearing whether the parents attend or not

This     is stated clearly in Neutral Citation no. (2002)     NIFam 11 Ref:    GILC3695 IN     THE MATTER OF SM (INTERIM CARE ORDERS: EXERCISE OF JUDGE’S DISCRETION)

Frankly I am not absolutely certain what the phrase `willbe renewed administratively by Court Office until date of review hearing’means. It was clear that counsel in this case were also somewhat unclear. It may be helpful if I set out at this stage some comments on the renewal of Interim Care Orders;

1.         When an Interim Care Order is made it is normally necessary for the making of further Interim Care Orders to be considered on at least one occasion before the finalhearing. I am given to believe that there may be a variety of local practices for dealing with such cases and while it is not intended to encourage courts to depart unnecessarily from well-established local arrangements(particularly those which approximate closely to what I recommend below), some guidance may be helpful to ensure a degree of uniformity. Although the makingof further Interim Care Orders is described as “renewal”, it must be rememberedthat the proper form of order is that the whole application is adjourned to the next date for further consideration.

2.         A courtmay not renew an Interim Care Order as a matter of course and without reconsideration. At the expiration of every Interim Care Order, the granting of every further Interim Care Order must be considered independentlyon its merits. It can never be right for a court granting an Interim Care Order at one sitting to attempt to lay down a policy which might fetter the discretion of any future sitting in regard to the grant or refusal of a further Interim Care Order – see Re P(Minors) (Interim Order) [1993]2 FLR 742.

3.         It is,therefore, necessary for the court to make a judgment regarding renewal in eachoccasion and the court should treat each further hearing as an opportunity to monitor the progress of the application. This does not mean however that all parties should be required to attend a hearing on each occasion. The court is perfectly entitled to deal with the matter on the basis of the attendance of the applicant only provided that written consents of the other parties are produced and no party objects. Provision can therefore be made at the first direction hearing for further Interim Care Orders to made without the need for the personal attendance of all the parties.
4.        In the Family Care Centres where the Trust, who normally would be the applicant, produces consents from all the parties, confirms that directions have been complied with and the court considers that it might be unduly onerous to require the personal attendance of his representative eg due to the distance to be travelled or for some other good reason, then I can see no reason inprinciple why the court should not permit the applicant Trust in those circumstances to make a written application for renewal. In such an instance, the responsibility would rest with the applicant to ensure that a written application was acceptable to the court, that all the consents were in order, and that all parties concerned were satisfied that the papers would reach the court file in time for the hearing. That application must however be considered by the appropriate judicial officer. Such aprocedure would be similar to the well-established practice of hearings on the papers presently carried on for example in the Court of Protection and beforemasters in the High Court.

I HEREBY ASK THAT THIS MATTER RECEIVES THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES BY THE POLICE AND OTHER REGULATORY BODIES WHO WILL BE INFORMED IMMEDIATLY OF THIS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE, AND THE PERSONS ACTING OUTSIDE THE LAW BE BROUGHT TO BOOK, AND THE CHILDREN THIS FALSE ICO ISSUED WAS REGARDING BE RETURNED AT ONCETO THEIR RIGHTFUL PARENTS, THE CHILDREN BEING REMOVED FROM THOSE PARENTS BY ILLEGAL MEANS ANYWAY, viz. FALSE EVIDENCE AND ALLEGATIONS BY EMPLOYEES OF HARINGEY COUNCIL.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THESE VISITORS TO THIS COUNTRY – THE MANY CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THEM BY HARINGEY COUNCIL AND PERSONS CONNECTED TO THEM IN THE REMOVAL OF THEIR 6 CHILDREN, SUCH AS THE ACTIONS OF THE GUARDIAN SOLICITOR ABOUT WHOM I HAVE ISSUED OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY IGNORED IS AN OUTRIGHT DISGRACE.

THANK YOU

J.GRAHAM

===============
2} From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk)
Sent: 26 June 2011 08:58:04
To:  lammyd@parliament.uk
Cc:  admin@number10.gov.uk;

Dear Mr. Lammy,
I understand you are the MP for the area in London in which the Nigerian Musa family are resident. Id like a meeting to see you immediatly, and I mean immediatly, about some very serious matters. I have written to you several times and have not received any reply, and quite frankly im appalled, not at your ignoring my communications, but the fact of what was in those communications, which told you of the many irregularities concerning the case of the Musa family having 5 children removed under very dubious circumstances. This pales into comparison with the fact that one of the children – the 9 year old girl Favour Musa – has not been seen for approx. 10 months since she reported being sexually molested – “inappropriatly touched” – whilst in the care provided by the local council. This is a very serious matter considering the girl has not been seen for 10 months by her parents, and neither have her brother or any of her sisters seen her either – and nobody is even told of her wellbeing or anything about her whatsoever – as I told you weeks ago by my ignored recorded delivery letter – which not only goes against the Childrens Charter the government is pushing, but also is against her and her parents Human Rights and also is against the orders the court made, and against the statutes for removed children in Britain also. What is happening is highly illegal but no authorities will face up to the situation. Why is this Mr. Lammy?
Unbelievably this appalling situation has now got worse in that the contact visits have stopped completely for these parents and their children – the parents not having seen any of their children for 4 weeks or more now – this disgraceful situation is totally illegal again and against the court orders etc. as Ive already said. Im sure youll agree all that is happening here comes within the remit your responsibility as the local MP, but it seems you are doing nothing and refuse to do anything even though i have sent you communications by email and by recorded delivery outlining clearly and concisely the numerous illegalities happening weeks ago. Can you please tell me why?
If you are wondering who i might be I will tell you I am a very concerned citizen and a friend of the family, have known them for some time, have stayed with them on numerous occasions and know very much the truths of this case. I have met many of this family’s friends who have been much affected by this case, {also having their relationships with their children interfered with by the same people},and I know other witnesses who I am in contact with constantly who have also been very much affected by things. I have been in contact with the police and the Chief Constable about this case,and many others. Reporters like Christopher Booker dont write articles for over a year on a case unless theres something very much to it {pls. see below}.

So as I said I would like a meeting with you as soon as possible to find out just why you are failing to do what you are paid to do – to represent these people when something such as they are suffering is happening. I can come to any venue you like to meet you, Parliament or anywhere, but I cannot stress the urgency of a meeting. I have sent you many emails and communications by recorded delivery as I have the MP Theresa May – kindly do not ignore this one.
Thank you. This message is a true sworn statement.
J Graham.

————————————————————————————————————————
“Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the Musa family torture at the hands of Haringey council:
STILL NOTHING HAS BEEN HEARD ABOUT THIS MISSING GIRL AS OF 26 6 2011:
SUNDAY 12 6 11:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html
The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act
The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.
======================================

3}
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:51:19 +0100
Subject: Fwd: FW: URGENT! FAO LOUISE CASEY – THE MUSA FAMILY
From: butlincat75@googlemail.com
To: mayt@parliament.uk; ruffleyd@parliament.uk; info@telldavidruffley.com; timyeomp@parliament.uk; Lynne@lynnefeatherstone.org; shappsg@parliament.uk; camerond@parliament.uk
CC: ben.rankin@mirror.co.uk; community@mirror.co.uk; cservices@mgn.co.uk; editor@guardian.co.uk; editor@dailymail.co.uk; editor@express.co.uk; editor@gazettegroup.com; editor@independent.co.uk; editor@mailonsunday.co.uk; editor@observer.co.uk; editor@telegraph.co.uk; editor@thetimes.co.uk; expressletters@express.co.uk; feedback@mirror.co.uk; helen.foster.@bbc.co.uk; investigate@mirror.co.uk; letters@dailymail.co.uk; letters@guardian.co.uk; letters@independent.co.uk; letters@mailonsunday.co.uk; letters@observer.co.uk; letters@thetimes.co.uk; liz.james@express.co.uk; mailbox@mirror.co.uk; mirrornews@mirror.co.uk; news@gazettegroup.com; news@theplymouthherald.co.uk; pete.saull@bbc.co.uk;

Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:52:10 +0100
Subject: URGENT! FAO LOUISE CASEY – THE MUSA FAMILY
From: butlincat@gmail.com
To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Ms. Casey,
Having seen you on the tv the other day in your role as Victim’s Commissioner my gut instinct told me that you seemed a very caring conscientious person and I knew at once I had to write to you to make you aware of something and ask for your assistance in a very serious matter. There has been no response AT ALL when trying to tell people in so-called “authority”of a certain case with its numerouis outrageous irregularities and crimes involving the removal of 5 children from their parents by certain parties within Haringey council, N. London.
So it is with a heavy heart I have to tell you that many crimes have taken place by many people involved in the removal of these 5 children, and since the children were removed over a year ago things have got progressively worse until now things have become absolutely scandalous. Things have got so bad that the council can never ever afford to let the true facts and their involvement and actions over the past year become generally known, especially after the tragic and very sad cases of “Baby P” and Victoria Climbe where this council did indeed play a large part which led to these childrens lives being taken.
There really is so much to relate but I will concentrate on certain articles that explain things as best as I can. What follows below is a} my message to the Chief Constable Mr. Martin Baker after my appeals for something being done were totally ignored by my local police. Suffice to say I have sent many emails {which I can show you at any time if required} to parties such as the Prime Minister, MPs, Lord Triesman,numerous child care agencies and other government bodies, public figures and other child support agencies trying to explain the situation. I have not received any replies, even from my letters by recorded delivery to Ms. Theresa May MP, the local MP to the Musas Mr. David Lammy and others.{ I have the postal receipts of these letters sent as proof}.
Attatched are the articles of Mr. Christopher Booker, reporter, who has written approximately 11 artcles in the “Sunday Telegraph” over the last year. Restrictions now forbid him to report properly and openly on the case any more.
A Judicial Review has been issued regarding the judge, which kept on being rejected time and time again, but whethewr anything becomes of that remains to be seen, and an E.P.O. has been sent which was also rejected many times, which is another matter.
There are many more important details I cannot impart here, but suffice to say charges are in the pipeline to be issued over actions that have happened. I do ask sincerely for your help in this very serious matter Ms. Casey, because what is happening to these parents and especially the 5 children is a disgrace. Thank you for your time in reading my long diatribe and I hope so much you and your organisation can help these people as noone should ever have to go through what this family has.

Favour Musa also complained that she didnt like living in the home environment that she had been forced to accept that had been imposed upon her. She disliked the constant smoky atmosphere from presumably cigarettes but I raise the concern that massive numbers of 19 year olds in the UK smoke cannabis – marijuana – constantly, and I put it to anyone that this could easily be the situation here. Favour said that she would go upstairs at the property when the teenager had been smoking whatever and drinking cans of alcohol when he would play his guitar. It was on such an occasion it is understood the event of her being “inappropriatly touched” took place.
Can you imagine the scenario? It is disgusting. A child of African culture is forced to live with a beer-swilling teenager in a cigarette or cannabis smoke ridden atmosphere and after a few cans of alcohol apparently tries his luck with sexual advances on the 9 YEAR OLD child? I find this outrageous and just as outrageous is the police and Chief Constable and numerous other figures ignoring not only the “touching” episode{s} but also the illegalities of the contact visits not taking place – it is against the orders the court made and it against both parties human rights and it is against the Childrens Act. Why wasnt anybody listened to by the council or police or indeed anywhere when these facts were put before them? When I tried to explain to the judge “Sir Mark Potter” about Favour’s situation at Mr. Musa’s appeal request hearing I was told to shut up and sit down on numerous occasions at the Royal Courts of Justice on Monday 16 May and he said I was interfering!!! This is ourrageous when a 9 year old girl is having to go through what Ive described and denied from seeing any of her family – none of her sisters or brother or parents have seen her at all, and each time the Musa parents ask of her welfare they are told nothing!
Favour has been forced also to have a different Christian name by these council workers or somebody or other, that being “Lizzy”. Who gave themj the right to change her name? Was she asked? Did the parents have a say? Id bet everything I own she wasnt asked, and it seems to me to be part of subtle brainwashing tactics that can be used on a vulnerable innocent child – to change her name, and force her into a British culture of alcohol and cigarettes {or marijuana or crack being smoked?} along with the food that is totally alien to her. Is she being taken to church on a Sunday as she was used to doing when she was at home? I doubt it very much.{Her mother is a bishop in the African Evangelical church}.
These characters whove done this and forced a child into a situation where shes molested should be prosecuted for aiding and abetting a crime and doing nothing about it when its reported to them!! This is why its so important that you please listen to whats happening Ms. Casey. Also there is evidence and proof of all I say, and also of her being bitten by the family dog!! Was the dog removed from the premises so it couldnt do it again? So much is kept quiet and it is feared, as I tried to tell the police and the CC, that she is indeed dead or has been taken abroad.
Now the contact visits have ceased totally with all the children and the Musas havent seen their children for over 4 weeks – again against the orders of the court and against the so-called “Childrens Act” which is supposed to promote contact in situations like this, but the opposite is taking place.
Thank you for your time Ms. Casey. Please help this family and do what is right.
.Sincerely,
J. Graham. This is a true sworn statement.

The email that I received sent to Mr. Musa was so serious I went to the police. The email is here:

“HELP ! FAVOUR MUSA AGE 10 IS BEING ABUSED BY A GANG OF PAEDOPHILES !

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS 21 MEMSTEAD ROAD ,ERITH, KENT , DA8 3LA

Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Harringey Council to see or phone her;

Haringey Council have refused her aunts, uncles and,grandparents (9 family members in all) any contact with Favour even though they all came especially from Africa to see her !
She has 5 sisters and a brother ,and none of them have seen her for weeks !

Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION !

Favour needs YOUR HELP !! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER BECAUSE SHE DARED TO REPORT BEING ABUSED WHILE “IN CARE” !!

HARRINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P,and Victoria Climbé
They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds !

We do not know if she is alive or dead !! PLEASE,PLEASE, find and contact Favour , she is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS !! ” **********************************************************************************

Please take heed of what is being done here Ms. Casey.

The attatchments to this email are:
a} my letter to a foster care authority, with their reply – the only department to actually reply to any communication from me.
b} a witness statement from witness Ms. Moji Word,
e} communication from law advocate and former legal representative for the Musa’s Mr. Randle-Jolliffe about certain matters.
f} Mr. C. Bookers “Sunday Telegraph” articles – full year.
c} my letter to Lord Triesman, 14 5 11, no reply received.
d} My F.O.I. request to Haringey council, subsequently refused.
g} A witness statement from Kay Young who was targetted by the Haringey council as at least 5 other witnesses of the Musas have been, the result being Ms. Young fled the country thus keeping the child the council hade threatened to take, for no reason other than Ms. Young was a Musa witnress and knew everything that had happened to the family. She left behind a totally normal life, a home with all her belongings because of the harassment from the council who served a Section 47 on her, threatening to take her child for no reason whatsoever.
Directly below is Ms. Musa’s affadavit,
followed by my communications to the Chief Constable Mr. Baker after Dorset police refused to take my reporting seriously about a 9 year old girl being missing for 10 months after she had reported to her father on a contact visit that shed been “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested – by a 19 year old male in the foster family home. We have photos of this character and his mother.
——————————————————–
This is a letter from Mrs. Gloria Musa to a well known MP. Mrs. Musa got no reply or help in any way, as I didnt after sending many emails and letters via recorded delivery to her at Parliament, as Mr. Lammy was sent too. .

————————————————-

“Subject: APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE WE HAVE NOT SEEN OUR DAUGHTER FOR 9 MONTHS
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 10:56:40 +0000

> > From: Gloria > > Subject: APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE
> > To: mayt@parliament.uk
> > Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 6:54 AM

Rt Hon Theresa May MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Tel: 020 7219 5206
Fax: 020 7219 1145
mayt@parliament.uk

Dear Rt. Honourable May,

APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE

My Name is Mrs Gloria Musa. I am an author and Minister of Religion. I am married to Mr Musa. We have six children.
My husband and I arrived in the UK with visitors visas with two of our children and had the other four in the UK. We did not need to make any application as we do not wish to remain here.
On 8 April 2010 Haringey children’s services claimed that a neighbour had found a letter in the front garden of our temporary address which they alleged that my eldest daughter had written and sent in the police who in turn took away our children on the basis that my husband and I are child traffickers, I am a sex worker who was having sex with strangers in front of my children, I suffer from epilepsy and had brain surgery, I was physically and sexually abused by my step father as a child and given opium by him, my husband and I have a history of fleeing from professionals whenever we came to their attention due to issues relating to the care of our children and are therefore likely to flee with our children, we neglected our children etc.
The court granted an interim care order on the basis of these allegations and ordered a DNA on our children with a warning that my husband faced a long prison sentence if the allegations are correct. At this time I was pregnant for our sixth child.
On June 2010 our sixth child was born. Following the sudden birth which occurred because I was distressed as a result of not being allowed to see my children in care on that date, we notified the Local authority in line with their request.
Following the notification the Local authority sent about nine police men to the hospital who forcefully took away our daughter a few hours after she was born and I was badly manhandled and humiliated by the police. The Local authority then applied for the baby to be placed in care. I was not given any support but they tried to get me to retrospectively sign a document stating that i had authorised them to take the baby which i refused. My life has not been the same since then.
The DNA report came out after a long delay in October and proved that my husband and I are the parents of our children. Police evidence shows that i am not known to the police in any capacity and therefore not a prostitute. I was not born in the UK and never had a step father. My parents are still happily married and had never lived in the UK.
I had thought that the case would have ended and my children returned to me after the DNA result. I was wrong because the Local authority has rather intensified efforts to give up my children for adoption and long term care. They have instead changed their allegations relying on psychiatric reports prepared by a well known lying psychiatrist who is connected to them and an independent social services report. Although the lies are very obvious the judge has ignored all our please and has indicated that he has decided what to do though the hearing is listed for February 2010.
Honourable please do not ignore our plea we have decided that we want to leave the UK with all our childre without any further delay. The Local Authority thinks that they can keep our children and we can go.
We will not go without our children and would like you to please intervene. We are visitors here as foriegn nationals we need your help as our life is in danger here we need to return back with our children back to our famillies at home alive.we have writen to you twice last year and early this year please we plead for your urgent resp
This is a very abridged version of our experience and we are happy to meet with you in order to get the permission to leave with our children as soon as possible. Our children are not British and we are not prepared to leave them behind. They have suffered greatly in care. We have not seen our eldest daughter for who the Local authority is brainwashing our coercing since the past NIne months. In addition to falsely accusing her of writing the letter which they claim was found in our front garden they are making her write letters claiming that she wants to stay in care until she is 18. They stopped her from seeing us after she asked for a journal. They perhaps believed that she would tell us more about her experiences in the journal.
Before they stopped her from seeing us in contact, she had informed us that she was bitten by the carer’s dog and the carer’s 19 year old son was luring her into his upstairs room to touch her inappropriately and teach her how to smoke cigarettes. Although we brought this to the attention of the Local authority, they have failed to do anything but have rather continued to brain wash and coerce her. We worry for her future because if the same Local Authority which is supposed to be protecting her from abuse is happy to convince and compel her to agree that she wrote a letter which she did not write, then we are not sure what the future holds for children in England. They will probably grow up to believe that it is alright to lie.
Please help us. We just want to leave here alive with our children as we gave birth to them is our duty and responsility to give them the best.
We look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely
Mrs Gloria Musa”
———————————————————————————-
My message to a Chief Constable:
“FAO CHIEF CONSTABLE BAKER?

12/05/2011

To lcjb@dorset.pnn.police.uk
From: butlincat (butlincat75@googlemail.com)
Sent: 12 May 2011 03:04:10
To: lcjb@dorset.pnn.police.uk
Dear Mr. Baker,
I am writing to you as Chief Constable as I have knowledge of serious crimes it is my duty as a British citizen to report them. I am having to report these crimes to you as my previous attampt at informing a certain department at Dorset police failed miserably, as the emails below show. I am told by characters in this department to inform the sender of the email I received which details some of the crimes I wish to tell you about that he must inform people I already said were working outside the law. This obviously has been ignored by the people at Dorset police I contacted and I am asking you to put matters right by seeing the law is enforced regarding the child Favour being sexually molested whilst in care.
The basic facts are a 9 year old girl was removed by police along with others on the orders of Haringey council over a year ago. This girl – Favour Musa – then complained to her parents on a contact visit later that she had been molested by a character at the placement home. I have the details of the person concerned, including a photograph, and what supposedly happened after the event of molestation.
Yesterday the 11 5 2011 I received the email below from Chiwar Musa, stating about a paedophile ring and the child Favour Musa. I then called Bournemouth police on 01202 220055 to report crimes and I asked for the child protection department, spoke to someone eventually though I know not from which department who gave me an email address to which i should sent the email i received. I duly did this and the correspondance between myself and the police is below in its entirety.
I know from personal experience that when reporting a crime one does not have to go to the police force that is in the area where the crime one wished to report is, yet I am told this in these emails. I have reported crimes before on different occasions to a totally seperate police force area-wise to the crime{s} located area and it has received due process by the police, so I was amazed when I reported the serious crimes of a sexual nature on a minor I was fed this. This is unacceptable and I hereby report the crimes of sexual molestation to you as I have noone else to report it to. I cannot report it to Haringey police as I am told as I know of numerous instances where they have acted illegally whilst dealing with the Musa case of illegal child removal, and witness intimidation features highly on that list incidentally. This statement is truthful and I can relate many instances of that which I speak, including the serious witness intimidation connected to the Musa case of child removal who have been acted upon and intimidated by Haringey council.
An application for an E.P.O. is attatched below concerning the child concerned {names redacted} to try to show this is no fairy story. I know the Musas well, they are friends and I know them to be honest and truthful. I hereby ask you to enforce the law as others I have contacted refused to investigate what I have told them regarding sexual crimes against a minor. This is not the 1st time I have reported serious crimes to Bournemouth police which have been totally ignored and something should be done about this.
Thank you.
J. Graham.
——————————————
Another notice of the issuing of another E.P.O. concerning Favour Musa:

Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:02:09 +0100

LETTER BEFORE CLAIM

TO
Judge
FROM:
CC: {some names redacted}
Mr Musa – under separate cover
Bishop Gloria Musa – under separate cover
Royal Courts of Justice – under separate cover
Office for Judicial Complaints
Myself
REFERENCE DETAILS
I understand, all EPO’s (Emergency Protection Orders) I submitted were not acted upon. I also understand it has been claimed that only the NSPCC and Social Services can apply for an EPO.
Details of matter
Please be advised it is my intention to apply for an urgent Judicial Review with regard to who has authority to apply for an EPO (in accordance with the Children Act 1989), as I have for Favour Musa, Tabitha Musa and Abraham Musa. I understand my applications were not acted upon receipt of same (3 in total). I hand-delivered one, which was stamped as received by the Court Usher ast Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court; therefore, claiming acceptance of the application. I will, therefore, be requesting a Judicial Review on this matter for future cases.
I am sending Rt Hon Grant Shapps a copy of this e-mail, as I have kept him informed of this ongoing case since October 2010. Copy sent to John Hemming MP, as I mentioned to him at the Working Party on Family Law about the EPO applications.
I would also like to make clear, I understand by making the application for Judicial Review, anyone in my family could be ‘at risk’ from intimidation / and threats. I shall be submitting an EX160B Form, which should be in receipt by approximately 10 working days.
I look forward to receiving your reply within the stipulated 14 day period.
Yours sincerely

CC: As above
FORMS: C1 and C11 will be sent in a separate e-mail

——————————————————————————–

From Dorset police to me:

Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:46:35 +0100
From: Enquiries@Dorset.PNN.Police.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Hi John
We receive a number of unsubstantiated emails on the internet, however if there is evidence to support the allegations they should be forwarded to the correct police force to deal. I have taken advice from my Inspector and if a crime has occurred it will have to be investigated by the owning force area as previously given. This would need to be dealt in person by that Force.
Regards
Police Enquiry Centre
—–Original Message—–
From: butlincat . [mailto:adamski2012@hotmail.co..uk]
Sent: 11 May 2011 13:56
To: .Enquiries
Subject: FW: paedophiles

I am also surprised youve said:
“…instead of sending this type of email to a vast number of random people.”
as I certainly never intimated that at all and I doubt very much if this statement is anywhere near the truth.
A typo exists in my message – that being it is only Favour Musa who has not been seen by anybody for nearly 10 months, probably because she has complained about sexual molestation at a placement address. Also I have paperwork to suggest an E.P.O. is being sought by party connected to the family.
If I have heard nothing from you within 24 hours I will notify the Chief Constable etc.

Thank you.
J. Graham.

www.youtube.com/butlincat2
www.myspace.com/butlincat/blog
www.facebook.com/butlincat

——————————————————————————–
From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
To: enquiries@dorset.pnn.police.uk
Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:41:05 +0100
The emailer did not send it to numerous people to my knowledge, but to only me presumably as he was very worried. His local police are implicit in the many crimes involved in the taking of the 5 children.
Note: I repeat – Chiwar Musa is unable to go to his local police as they removed the children in the 1st pllace on false allegations given by Haringey council, so it is impossible for him to go to his local police. Nobody has seen the children from the family for 10 months how, and in the past the daughter has claimed if being molested at the care home.
I have notified you of potential crimes.Please forward the name of your superintendant or Chief Constable so I may contact him / them about this serious matter.
Thank you.
J. Graham.

ace.com/butlincat/blog
www.facebook.com/butlincat

——————————————————————————–
Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:30:41 +0100
From: Enquiries@Dorset.PNN.Police.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Hi John
I would have thought that the emailer should or would contact the local police instead of sending this type of email to a vast number of random people. I presume you have no knowledge of the emailer.
Regards
Karen
Police Enquiry Centre
—–Original Message—–
From: butlincat . [mailto:adamski2012@hotmail.co..uk]
Sent: 11 May 2011 13:19
To: .Enquiries
Subject: FW: paedophiles

This email below i received at the time / date shown – sincerely – John Graham
——————————————————————————–
The alarming message sent to me that I reported yet nothing was done by the police or Chief Constable:
From: musa91@hotmail.co.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk; butlincat75@googlemail.com
Subject: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:56:57 +0000
This was fowardeded to me

HELP ! FAVOUR MUSA AGE 10 IS BEING ABUSED BY A GANG OF PAEDOPHILES !

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS 21 MEMSTEAD ROAD ,ERITH, KENT , DA8 3LA

Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Harringey Council to see or phone her;

Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION !

Favour needs YOUR HELP !! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER BECAUSE SHE DARED TO REPORT BEING ABUSED WHILE “IN CARE” !!

HARRINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P,and Victoria Climbé
They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds !

We do not know if she is alive or dead !! PLEASE,PLEASE, find and contact Favour , she is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS !!