MY LATEST BLOG ALWAYS ON TOP OF LIST OF BLOGS ON THE RIGHT
It was in Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court with my father that I first met this fine gentleman. Battered and bruised but far from battle weary from the likes of those you will regularly find, in South Wales at least, in our UK so called ‘law’ courts. There to uphold the ‘truth’ and ‘justice’. How much further from reality can these two words mislead?
Incidentally, Dad was there to witness for himself how very diffent are the morals of many left in charge of the welsh judicial systems, not all I must emphisise!
Further down this page you will find a particularly revealing article, as TO WHAT REALLY GOES ON IN OUR COURTS written by Norman once again exposing the myth that only honest men and women are found passing judgements in our courts.
It was the spirit seen in the likes of Norman, Gerald and Yvonne Gillow (Guernsey), Patrick Cullinane and Sheda Oraki , as examples, who picked me off the floor during a particularly nastspell in my life when being perpetually persicuted by local police officers in the Vale of Glamorgan.
The latter are getting away with it due to the judiciary’s secret promise with them of immunity to prosecution. Many a time I have proven a police officer lying in the witness box only for the presiding judge to ‘look the other way’ but for all to see. The police, long ago, have agreed not to arrest members of their own judicary also perverting the course of justice, no of course not. ‘You scratch my back and I will scratch yours’.
Yet another reason why the 1997 Human Act was so hurriedly drafted, under Blair. to contradict the 1948 European Charter of Human Rights and Fundimental Freedoms.
We no longer have redress to those ultimately responsible for our own legislation
I, of course, refer to the notorious ‘Memorandum of Understanding’. A particularly evil piece of legislation much practiced in the South Wales courts and may be due to the high level of ‘devil worship’ practiced in the Vale. It takes a new arrival from across the Severn Bridge mere nanoseconds to identify the underlying purpose of freemasonry.
Norman, a true horseman as he can read their minds, at home in central Ireland
Maurice, you digress. Gifted Norman knows more about the CCRC than I do as the police’s ‘machine gun’ conspiracy exposed too many corrupt Cardiff judges thereby baring me from their hand of friendship..
Despite clear documented proof of the routine nefarious activities of South Wales ‘authority’, surrounding the the ‘machine-gun’ jury trial, the CCRC even called the police on me when visiting the CCRC head office in Birmingham.
Investigate, please, our Norman and bombard PublicAppointmentsTeam@justice.gov.uk to make similar ‘voice’ at the CCRC offices once known to be the pinnicle of publishing right from wrong.
(I am not a supporter of Mr Assange, putting the lives of both UK subjects and US citizens in jeopody but, by gad, his spirit was almost in the right place!)
From: Norman Scarth
Sent: 17 May 2020 04:25
Subject: PAT 150091. CCRC
To The Ministry of Justice, Public Appointments Team. (This text is also attached as a Word Document, for ease of printing).
PublicAppointmentsTeam@justice.gov.uk Ref:PAT 150091.
Fao Helen Pilcher, Chair of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) & Karen Kneller, CEO.
From Norman Scarth,
BALLINASLOE, Co. Galway, Ireland
Please accept this as my Application for the position of Commissioner with the Criminal Cases Review Commission, as announced in The Law Gazette
I make it in the assumption that it is a real position & not a ‘fantasy’, as indicated in the first sentence of your information pack, which says it is “A fantastic(sic) intellectually challenging and rewarding role playing a vital part in the Criminal Justice System.”
I am assuming that the reason for this strange statement is that the job of producing the pack was given to someone whose understanding of the English language was not all it should be, a fault which is all too common these days, even in official circles. A person who does not understand the difference between fantasy & reality. I suspect your convoluted ‘Application Procedure’ was drafted by a similar person, & though I have tried to follow that procedure, I ask that you overlook any minor deficiencies from me in that respect.
CV as regards my experience in the field of what are euphemistically known as ‘Miscarriages of Justice’.
Born in 1925, with a life far removed from law, not until 1994 did I become aware that all far from well in the British courts. Speaking at the Lord Mayor of London’s Mansion House Banquet in 1936, Lord Chief Justice Hewart said, “His Majesty’s judges are satisfied with the almost universal admiration in which they are held”.
Whether it was true then, I know not, but HER Majesty’s judges are certainly not held in such high regard now, nor do they deserve to be As is known by anyone with an inkling of what really goes on in our courts.
Much of the blame lies with Lord Denning, who was rated (BY SOME!) as the finest judge of the 20th Century. In his book ‘WHAT NEXT IN THE LAW’ he wrote about ‘Abuse of Power’. “Whoever may be guilty of abuse of power, be it Government, State, Employer, Trade Union or whoever, the law must provide a speedy remedy. Otherwise the victims will find their own remedy. There will be anarchy.”
A most important warning to the nation – but it is notable that Denning excluded the judiciary from his list of those who might abuse their power!
Some of his earlier words were less worthy.
At one of his lectures to the Holdsworth Club at Birmingham University he said, “No British judge has been biased for 300 years”.
(Palpable nonsense, but even the ECtHR has swallowed it – see elsewhere.)
In Sirrus v Moore, 1974, Denning said, “No matter that (a judge) be motivated by the utmost malice, greed, envy & all uncharitableness, he is not liable to any action”. This self-proclaimed immunity was falsely proclaimed, but accepted as the word of God ever since.
I myself have knowledge – & evidence – of judges who were indeed ‘motivated by the utmost malice, greed, envy & all uncharitableness’.
(His words on The Birmingham Six are well known, & are universally condemned, yet he is STILL revered by many).
Elsewhere he said, “Better that innocent men should remain in prison than that the integrity of the judiciary be impugned” – in gross contempt of his own Judicial Oath, & that of the Sovereign, in whose name he purported to act. Those very words belie that ‘integrity’, & show him to be completely unfit for judicial office.
Outrageous though the words were, it is a dictum which is followed by the whole of the legal profession. No Judge, no appeal court (nor even the ECtHR – nor even the CCRC!) will ever accept that a judge acted dis-honourably.
They will accept that s/he “Misdirected the jury”, or that, “S/he misdirected him/herself on the law”.
They will never even hint that “the judge knowingly & deliberately acted in contravention of the law, or his Oath” (which, in either case means s/he was NOT acting judicially, & thus not entitled to whatever immunity he might otherwise be entitled to).
No lawyer would dare say that: Nor, sadly would any previous Commissioner of the CCRC.
Well, I AM prepared to rock the boat! (Which will, no doubt, ensure I am not appointed!)
The claim that ‘Miscarriages of Justice’ are rare is untrue. The fact that the prison population has doubled since Lawyer Blair achieved power is evidence that they are increasing rapidly.
Shocked by my discovery of the true state of affairs, 25 years ago I left my previous career behind, & became a self-employed researcher, activist, author & adviser in the field of Human Rights, &, particularly, violations thereof, continuing to the present day.
During this time I have been successful in the European Court of Human Rights (Scarth v UK, 33745/96), & a SUCCESSFUL reformer of law in the United Kingdom (see letter dated 1/9/1998 from Geoffrey Hoon MP, then Lord Chancellor Irvine’s spokesman in The House of Commons.)
You must surely accept that the public respect for the CCRC is not as great as you would like it to be? In fact, anyone with an inkling of what goes on in our courts sees it as the sop which it is, to placate the gullible. Most of the Commissioners are lawyers, & they are not going to rock the boat to do more than cause a little ripple. Even those who are not lawyers tend to support ‘The Establishment’ (& would not be appointed if they did not!)
What is needed is an eagle eye for malpractice, which I would be able to provide better than most.
I suggest my qualifications for the position of Commissioner of the Criminal Cases Review Commission are at least as great as any other applicants, & that my appointment could lift not only the public perception of the CCRC, but the actuality of its performance!
Now of advanced years, my physical activity is obviously limited, but I am fortunate that my brain remains as good as ever.
As referees, I give the names of Dr. XXXXXXXXXXXXX & Mr XXXXXXXXXX Signed electronically: N.Scarth
18 May 2020, 16:53 (9 hours ago)
well done Norman
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
STOLEN MACHINE GUN COURT PAPERS UPDATE
|101 Exeter||11:11 (48 minutes ago)|
Thank you for your email, received on Tue May 19 11:00:56 BST 2020
We will aim to respond to your email within 24 hours, however at times of significant demand, some delays may be experienced.
If your email needs to be forwarded to a particular officer or specialist department we will do that within 24 hours, that officer or specialist department may not be able to respond right away. The officer may not be immediately available and some specialist departments only work office hours.
We are currently experiencing a high level of demand. Please be advised that our call takers are briefed to direct all requests for information and advice related to coronavirus to www.gov.uk. If your email is for COVID-19 advice, we will not be able to reply to your email. Please, Stay Alert – Control the Virus – Save Lives