The Secretary to 4th Restraining Order Jury Trial T20170239
Her Honour Judge Tracy Lloyd Williams
20th November 2017
My Psychiatrist still needs Neurologist’s and Police Ordered Dr Metters’ Psychiatric Reports
- Your harassed police victim, of twenty-five years standing, informed the court he needed a ‘pre-sentencing forensic psychiatric report’ due to police unlawful conduct,
- in blocking his urgently diagnosed need for hospital appointments now leaving him with ‘significant’ potentially carcinogenic lesions eventually diagnosed abroad
- in their deliberate delaying required forensic psychiatrists’ reports for this court
- in their deliberate withholding HM Crown Prosecution Service police gathered data before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, in 2009, for application for their victim to be incarcerated, indefinitely, in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital when knowing he had been falsely MAPPA level 3 category 3 registered
- in registering contrary to their records stating, ‘no threat’ to the general public.
- This Cardiff court knows very well why? Thirteen Welsh judges, so far, have shown of any testicles in standing up to their masonic masters that ultimately dominate welshing court proceedings from the higher ranks of their local bullying police force.
- Your victim added the caveat his request was for a psychiatrist to be ONLY from Wales.
- therefore, he needs to know why no forensic psychiatrist could be ‘found’, in almost three months in the whole of Wales, who were they and WHY did they all refuse?
- His family is well aware of the evilness behind this as last time, when this scandalous scenario arose, their father had to remain in HMP prison for a further eight months, no less, on the same bloody lies, “oh, oh, we cannot find a psychiatrist to confirm our victim is either safe to be released or too dangerous to remain in a prison”.
- Spineless vermin, the lot of you and the quicker you get judicial autonomy the better.
Copy to Criminal Court of Appeal
My today’s REDACTED letter to helpers copied to both trial Judge and Criminal Court of Appeal seeking clarification over the apparent abuse of 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act
Ref enclosed document
Any one else, of course, can do precisely what they like, say cut in to squares and hang on a hook in the outside loo
The 4th judge has not changed that view either, yet, so I asked again, at last hearing for clarification but the court refused , may be due to a jury trial in progress in tandem.
This letter is being sent to the Cardiff Crown Court and Court of Appeal in hope I get some helpful guidance
This letter is yet to be responded to:
Dr Ruth Bagshaw
10th November 2017
Incorrect NHS (Wales) Medical Reports Seriously Damaging My Health
Now Professor Wood has retired I am free to request from you a copy of his original 18th September 2017 letter he emailed to you stating my ‘significant brain damage’ was due to my having been ‘a long term drinking partner of actor, Oliver Reed’.
Your then in-house clinical psychologist, but under duress, allowed me to read both pages of such nonsense now at ‘gross variance’ in its current form, of same date, held in NHS central records but altered to put the blame on a forensic psychiatrist.
In the unlikely event of my not obtaining a promise that I will be given copy, for various criminal and civil courts and for next week’s court hearing, then I may have to raise the matter with Her Honour Judge Tracy Lloyd Clarke and CCRC.
I will be applying for Her Honour to order, if need be, in the issuing of witness subpoenas on the fourteen people who attended my weekly ‘around the table’ discussions caused by the then professor’s report. The GMC will be informed.
After Caswell Clinic’s 7th Aug 2009 forensic psychiatric report by police blackmail, to achieve my s35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act incarceration, Dr David Seely has recommended I see a neurologist and Dr Gaynor Jones has recommended I see her also due to my marked deterioration in health following 25 years of incessant police bullying with no judiciary apparently ‘fit for purpose’ to stop their criminal conduct.
May I suggest these issues need to be expedited before my sentencing hearing next week. This will require the rumoured April 2013 ‘variation’ restraining order, not correctly served on me but reliant on the magistrates’ 1st December 2011 restraining order never served on me in the first place, to be ‘varied or completely ‘struck out’.
My 4th May 2012 jury was bluntly refused courts, Geoamey and police evidence of the purported ‘service’ of ‘papers’ in my cell and considered “irrelevant” (see court transcript).by His Honour Judge John Curran as he had seen some before ‘doctored’.
Their ‘jury note’ was also deliberately withheld from me and my 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal to further disrupt my civil claim following 33 failed malicious prosecutions.
Maurice J Kirk BVSc