Who’s Afraid of the #Internet? #MauriceKirk BVSc v Dr Williams [on behalf of @SWPolice]

It takes the observation of MANY cases to realise the depth of deception that is paraded in courts. That’s why one of my blogs is called We Who Oppose Deception, even though it focusses on the bigger picture of mass deception.

Going through the bundle of 135 pages that Maurice has to process for this case, I ask myself how many staff have been paid by the public purse to put him into Caswell Clinic, where Dr Tegwyn Williams was the Director, and / or in prison since.

At the time, Dr Williams was commissioned by South Wales Police to put him away to the high security mental hospital Ashworth for life. Hence he produced the false diagnosis that has been refuted by six documents on this blog post.

However, South Wales Police keep trying to get him behind bars, using the infamous Restraining Order of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 that I have also experienced – for the same reason: online exposure – even though Subsection 3a says clearly that Section 1 does not apply,

when reporting or preventing crime.

In the words and spirit of The Law, it is also more than evident that Maurice had reasonable excuse to defend himself against the torture caused by imprisonments and re-arrests.

Violating a Restraining Order or Reporting and Detecting Crimes?

Maurice is now supposed to have violated the Restraining Order on 4 counts which gives the jury the power to send him to prison, while the judge has to advise whether it’s in the public interest to send him to prison, yet again.

On 01 December 2011 when not enough seats were in the public gallery to hold supporters, this Restraining Order was made in the Magistrates Court Cardiff:

You must not

  1. contact, approach or communicate with Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever;
  2. disseminate any material, photographic or otherwise, relating to Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams;
  3. become a party to the display or dissemination of any material, photographic or otherwise, in relation to Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams;
  4. place any information on the Internet any material, photographic or otherwise, relating to Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams;
  5. become a party to any material being placed on the Internet, photographic or otherwise, relating to Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams;
  6. attend within the curtillage of the Caswell Clinic or its grounds.

On 12 April 2013 this Change of Restraining Order was supposedly made, while Maurice was in prison. Can you detect a ‘change’ in any of the words?

He’s effectively being accused of using the Internet as the Court of Public Interest and Public Opinion – as his last resort to:-

  1. defend himself after vicious and malicious attacks;
  2. expose his case of Police Corruption as one of many mentioned in Bent Lawyers and Cops;
  3. expose Dr Williams’ crimes online, as they are being covered up in Courts.

False Witness Statements after False Diagnosis

To back the efforts of South Wales Police, Dr Williams produced Witness Statements which Maurice refutes, just as professional experts refuted his false diagnosis.

However, even Maurice has seen the most ‘obscene’ one, South Wales Police have refused to close it. Maurice recalls that the handwritten statement said something like “he was found at night at my house with a can of petrol and the Police moved him on.”

Meanwhile, his most recent document of 03 November 2016, says that Maurice has published:-

  • he was sleeping with Barbara Wilding
  • he was subject to Criminal Review
  • “Wanted Dead or Alive” posted
    • which is true
  • that Maurice was CONVICTED of harassing him
    • which was true; but was it correct / just / fair / justified or the result of corruption as virtually everything that came Maurice’s way
  • that the Restraining Order was amended [note the above zero difference between the original and the changed order]
  • that he was finding him in New Zealand
    • that he was looking for a Christchurch based solicitor
    • that he was gone to New Zealand to “escape the corruption of South Wales Police”

On 03 November 2010 Dr Williams complained about

  • “inaccurate and disturbing information”
  • “My children do not like seeing “WANTED: Dead or Alive” posters with my picture on them strewn over the internet.

What came first:

  • Maurice’s children having to visit him in prison and Caswell Clinic courtesy of Dr Williams’ “brain damage diagnosis” or
  • Dr Williams’ children seeing “Dead or Alive posters”?

Over to you, dear jury members: who’s guilty of what crime?

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Access to Justice, Caswell Clinic, Fair Trial and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Who’s Afraid of the #Internet? #MauriceKirk BVSc v Dr Williams [on behalf of @SWPolice]

  1. truth1 says:

    The cause is a noble one. But all Europe has a thorough history the powerful abusing the weak. War was used time and again to lay claim to wide areas of land formerly owned by those who beaten in the wars, captured and enslaves. Rome’s history is filled with this pattern. Soon, none of us had land. It all belonged to the conquerors like William of 1066 AD.

    So now we are all enslaved and abused, though told over and over again that we are free and equal and have rights. One can not be free without land ownership (soon to be abolished around the world) and a community judging its own affairs without some neighboring power threatening to intervene.

    In addition, farming is self-sufficient and does not produce excessive wealth, that makes some envy and want the same, at any cost. If everyone is in the same boat. there is nothing to be jealous or envious of. Most of our ills come from organized collective concentrations of populations who are harnessed in factories to produce items of status or power. Some do not want to work in their own behalf and want others to do their work for them. That is a big problem. For that, we need a force and authority beyond corruption and benevolent and all powerful, too. That would God, Jehovah in English at least since 1209 AD if not a good deal earlier.

    Otherwise, our problems have no solution, other than to make others aware that there is a problem that does need fixed. May God not be slow!

  2. Reblogged this on Musings of a Penpusher and commented:
    The truth on this case is long overdue.

  3. Pingback: #Judge #Jury or #Internet: who delivers #justice in #PublicCourts of #PublicInterest? @MoJGovUK @SWPolice | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

  4. Sammy Wammy says:

    I empathise with Maurice the system is wrong and those in power wrongly tarnish others. A toxic hostile cesspit of corruption.

  5. Sammy Wammy says:

    Well I guess the guy who said Maurice needed sectioning for life, didn’t like it when his wellbeing was undermined. I can totally see the point Maurice makes maybe a slight god complex concerning others mental health and a failure to recognise how abusive wrongly labelling someone as needing sectioning is. I’d say Maurice dished out some snake bite antidote with his wanted posters. But the emperor was always wearing clothes wasn’t he?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s