MAURICE TEMP NUMBER: +254790212599
SUPREME COURT Reminder re our court’s Immunity to Criminal or Civil Prosecution
Extract from recent Supreme Court for Wales’ immunity to prosecution for whatever they do in their incestuous little world of English hatred:
‘The Supreme Court unanimously allows the Government’s appeals, holding that, insofar as the respondents’ tort claims are based on acts of an inherently governmental nature in the conduct of foreign [INSERT WELSH] military operations by the Crown, these were Crown acts of state for which the Government cannot be liable in tort. Lady Hale (with whom Lord Wilson agrees) gives the main judgment. Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke each give concurring judgments. Lord Hughes agrees with Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Neuberger. The court will seek further submissions from the parties as to the appropriate form of declaration in each of these cases’.
16 01 16 MAURICE KIRK v SOUTH WALES POLICE BS624159 etc
Judge costs order para 8/9 re quotes his old orders for police record production of 33 incidents as my EXHIBITS 12 years ago. Police again laugh and hide the key eye witnesses of each incident. Judge now penalises me for producing those 54 files and continues to deny me for RCJ appeal the court management log, list of exhibits in 25 year running case, a sealed Oct 15 judgment etc — it stinks?
Clerk to HHJ Harrison
County Court Case BS614159 etc etc
17th Jan 2017
Dear Mr Willis,
Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police
You indicated you would reply to my various letters requesting disclosure of court documents to which I am lawfully entitled.
I have heard nothing
I enclose a lawyer letter of last August containing requests for much the same data.
I understand the Cardiff courts have blocked him now following his attendance to obtain my 1st Action 8.6 ‘garrotte’ incident interview tape, proving conspiracy, when the police lied in court as being unable to identify me and had me locked up in Cardiff prison on spurious criminal indictable allegations all of which, at the time, the Crown Prosecution refused to put before ANY COURT!
My nurse in the public gallery took notes that the police inspector stated I could not be identified (but knew the Guernsey police had confirmed all on a call the day before)! The latter now said on oath before HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC in 2013 trial.
HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC in his Dec 16 costs order again reminded the police to identify this police inspector and one hundred others to be summoned to his civil court hearing for damages but were not.
I request a copy of your court’s reply to the nobbled lawyer, from Rosie Pahl and need of her whereabouts in order that I may serve a witness summons for the high court to disclose whatever their Lordships consider appropriate.
Maurice J Kirk BVSc