Trial Day 4 – JURY OUT – Refused Police, Court, Medical and Witnesses Records

Cardiff Crown, Case Progression
CaseProgression@cardiff.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk
4 Sep (11 days ago)

Dear Mr Kirk

Your application for a witness summons was referred to the Recorder of Cardiff, who has made the following decision:

Maurice Kirk has written to the court seeking witness summonses in relation to eight people:

1. (censored)
2. Dr Janis Hillier
3. XXX
4. Barbara Wilding, former Chief Constable
5. Judge Seys Llewellyn QC (retired)
6. Judge John Curran (retired)
7. Counsel for the prosecution, M  Smyth.
8. HHJ Rowlands

Although the applications are not in the prescribed form I have considered them, without the need for a hearing and I make the following ruling:

I have applied the two criteria set out in s.2 of the Criminal Procedure (Attendance of Witnesses) Act 1965 i.e.

  1. Whether they are likely to be able to give material evidence and
  2. Whether it is in the interests of justice to issue a summons

The current proceedings relate to the alleged breach of the restraining order by Mr Kirk through posting material relating to censored on his website. The grounds provided by Mr Kirk, in support of these applications, refer to what occurred during earlier criminal and civil proceedings, in this and other courts, and have no direct relevance to the issue of whether he posted this material in breach of the order. Through these applications, Mr Kirk seeks to widen the ambit of the trial way beyond the issues the jury has to consider in relation to this particular indictment. The offensive language used by Mr Kirk, to describe some of these witnesses, leads me to conclude that Mr Kirk’s motive in seeking their attendance, is to cause them at least unnecessary inconvenience and, in the case of censored and Dr Hillier, to cause them further harassment and distress.

I am not satisfied that any of the witnesses can give material/relevant/admissible evidence in relation to issues which can legitimately arise during the trial and in any event, I am not satisfied it would be in the interest of justice to issue the summonses.”

regards

Michael Harris

Cardiff & Newport Crown Court / Llys y Goron Caerdydd & Casnewydd

Ffon / Phone: 029 20678755  Goldfax:0870 3240261 SecureEmail: Listing@cardiff.crowncourt.gsi.gov.uk

17 09 15 screen shot RO appl

Another Judge Refuses to Order an Outside Police Force Investigation

This application was blocked in Cardiff magistrates again and again yesterday when the judge was ordered to block it with all  my other records of evidence.

This included all my defence witnesses collected over the years witnessing doctor bullying in Caswell Clinic by Dr Roger Thomas  and Paul Thomas, head of the freemasons.

Their being in charge, when they had me arrested for ‘attempted burglary, is typical of what they could resort to.
Anything to block the real reason why censored was made to falsify medical records by the South Wales Police for an Ashworth incarceration application
CLEARLY ALL TOO BIG A PROBLEM FOR MY 13 CARDIFF JUDGES, SO FAR, ALL FOUND ATTEMPTING TO STIFLE THE TRUTH OF POLICE CONSPIRACY.
The Clerk of the Court
Cardiff Crown Court
Wales
16th September 2017
 censored
The convicted Defendant requests,
1. copy of his 15th Sept 2017 Restraining Order be  served on him in order he may understand it as he remains completely confused over 12th April order
2. copy of Cardiff Magistrates records re current court proceedings  are reliant on 1st Dec 2011 restraining order (c/f certs of convictions & ‘bad character’ data)
3. copy of Cardiff Magistrates  records that 2nd May 2014 Crown Court proceedings (3rd  trial) were reliant on 1st December 2011 order
4. copy of Cardiff Magistrates records that 4th May 2012 Crown Court proceedings (1st  trial) were reliant on 1st December 2011 order
5. copy within this current Crown Court’s trial’s rulings that the blocked defence/prosecution witness, who gave relevant evidence in 1st Dec 2011 censored  hearing is now discredited and so removed as the prosecution witness, only this week, due to new evidence now disclosed from in 2012 trial proceedings.
6. the earliest date available, please,  for his requested 5th order jury trial  if it is not successfully transferred to Bristol Crown court due to the real risk of bias.
No prosecution witnesses will need attend from Wales as he will accept their MG11 witness statements as true and both Crown Prosecutor and himself reside near by.
peter vaughan
This entry was posted in Access to Justice, Fair Trial, HM Court Services, Law Enforcement and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Trial Day 4 – JURY OUT – Refused Police, Court, Medical and Witnesses Records

  1. Peter Weston says:

    Maurice

    Give it a rest. Do you really want to spend more time in chokey or die in penury? You might have won (ie the CPS withdrew) on minor cases but you are losing on the big ones.

    Why not spend more time on your flying and less on being locked up?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s