On the Unusual, Extreme and Indefinite Aspects of Kirk v South Wales Police

Posted on December 23, 2010 by Sabine Kurjo McNeill

In 2004, their Lordships Hoffmann, Roder of Earlsferry and Sir Philip Otton represented the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council and delivered a judgment of 35 paragraphs on eleven pages.

Paragraph 2 begins with “This is a very unusual case.” What they find unusual, is that “no animal has any ground for complaint against him. Mr Kirk’s problem is with people.”

In September 2010, Case No. BS 614159-MC65, CF101741 and CF204141 describe KIRK v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES POLICE – the legal action for civil damages.

HH Seys Llewellyn QC is the presiding judge and has commented more than once that this is a “very unusual case”.

Maurice has issued a Preliminary Skeleton Argument of 153 paragraphs on 22 pages and the Police’s lawyers lodged their Skeleton Argument in 277 paragraphs on 83 pages.

What is “unusual”?

  1. the number of motoring incidents that the Police instigated – as can be seen in this schedule of incidents
  2. the number of incidents that the Police claims not to know about

What is extreme, is listed here.

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is now a solution to the Prime Number problem: https://primenumbers.store/
This entry was posted in Campaigning, Privy Council, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to On the Unusual, Extreme and Indefinite Aspects of Kirk v South Wales Police

  1. Pingback: PREPARATION for Civil Court Case with Judge Seys Llewellyn | Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

Comments are closed.