UK Courts don’t provide effective remedies or fair trials and fail to disclose evidence

When Maurice sent me a notice where the Treasury Solicitor’s Department expected a payment of £2,200, I suggested he should offer them £10 per month until the £50,000 judgment in Maurice’s favour is being paid.

Instead, he produced this chronology of events that illustrate:

  1. the absence of effective remedies before national authorities (Article 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights) and fair trials (Article 6 of the European Conventional on Human Rights) and Article 47 of the European Fundamental Rights Charter
  2. the ineffectiveness of HM Court Service as a way to obtain justice
  3. the effectiveness of HM Court Service to keep solicitors, barristers and judges well fed.

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Access to Justice, Article 13: effective remedy before national authorities, Article 1: binding, Article 6: fair trial, Campaigning, European Law of Human Rights, HM Court Services and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s