LEST WE FORGET

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lest We Forget

In our current European caos ( t e letter between g & j will not work) we must not forget tose t at stopped Germany and Russian dominance

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

South Wales Chief Superintendent Caught Lying on Oath

To: Lieutenant General James Bashall 
           National President, Royal British Legion
Dear Lt. Gen. Bashall,
   Neither the Royal British Legion or the MOD Veterans Dept have contacted 96-year-old Arctic Convoys veteran Norman Scarth.
1. I telephoned t e Royal British Legion this morning and request that they contact 96-year-old Norman Scarth.

2. I have printed off all emails below and have posted them directly to you. Please see below.

Your item was posted at Post Office® branch, Post Office on 12-11-2021. More information will be available as it travels through our network.Tracking number: NY702464677GBService used: Royal Mail Special Delivery Guaranteed 1pm™ 
Yours respectfully,
Leonard Lawrence

The proverbial hits the fan

So, ‘Parliamentary process’ is still in trouble over lobbying?

So is my MP in trouble, also directed by the same ‘Parliamtary procedure’, continuing to refuse to answer serious constituents cries for help contrary to ECHR

At my recent one million pound 1CF03361 ‘machine gun’ damages Cardiff claim, euphemistically called a trial before Judge Petts, retired Chief Stuart Superintendent Mackenzie was swiftly arrested following his being caught lying on the tape records.—

MY LEGAL PAPERS STOLEN BY G4S, in an act of robbery, are still required back for my appeal due shortly.

He said the 2008 Chief Constable Barbara Wilding Gold Group led criminal investigation, into my being ‘in possession’ of a ‘prohibited weapon’, was run by him and exclusively by him, which we all knew procedures for a MAPPA 3/3 registered victim by standard policing, was a blatant lie.

Chief Constable Barbara Wilding, the Defendant in my civil claims, had to have been in charge of her latest ridiculous allegations over a film prop replica WW2 Lewis machine gun , not just because she was also the Defendant in my 90s BS614159 forty three failed police malicious criminal prosecutions but it was listed, in January 2010, to soon ‘hit the proverbial fan’!

This meant the Gold, Silver and Bronze Group police investigations and their findings were deliberately kept completely hidden from the Criminal and Civil Procedure Rules procedures of ‘disclosure’ of facts identifying malfeasance.

It identifies yet another tranche of deceitful senior SWP officers not disclosed under primary or secondary CPR in the daft maliciously brought ‘machine gun’ criminal trial either, such is the level of welsh so called ‘justice’ for those interested into what ‘what actually goes on in our UK law courts.

This is my witness statement pertaining to the current Exeter Crown Court case connected to MAURICE J. KIRK,
Regarding:
1]
 the Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Mr. M. JUKES  and2] the entity known as G4S PLC [who run “security staff” – warders – in the relevant prisons Mr. MAURICE KIRK is connected to in this matter: HMP Cardiff and HMP Parc, during 2019].
These 2 subjects were asked, during September 2019, via a formal F.O.I.A. [S.A.R. / DPA requests, for a copy of this letter authored by Maurice Kirk and meant to be sent to myself during May 2019 – this letter being stopped from leaving HMP Cardiff by the G4S prison employees and/or SWP in May 2019 as it had an alleged “substance” on it which might [qu.] “caused distress to another” [unqu.] [referring to the charge M KIRK was remanded in custody regarding].
Mr. Jukes, Chief Constable of South Wales police was sent the FOIA request on the 17 September 2019; GFS PLC were sent the FOIA request on the 28 September 2019.
This withheld letter obviously exists as Mr. Kirk was charged with attempting to send it to myself – the charge pertaining to that, which also enforced the custodial remand of Maurice Kirk, being dropped also at a later date by the CPS.My F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. requests have not been responded to by anyone, to date.
 Signed: This is a true sworn statement and signed by myself John Graham on the 11 May 2021.
Attached are:the F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. request sent to G4S PLC –
an identical request was sent to Mr. Jukes, of SWP, also attached.The acknowledgement letter from G4S PLC re: my request Acknowledgement from SWP’s “Disclosure Team”s Mr. Jenkins, telling me to write to G4S PLC, not SWP.
My F.O.I.A. [S.A.R.] / D.P.A. request has not been responded to by anyone, to date.

Another example of SWP’s total disregard for the rule of law

THE CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF MY MP

That must explain why my designated MP refuses to answer any of my pleas, my letters from Welsh prisons, for help both before and following the 1st November 2019 robbery by by G4S Park prison staff to steal, on behalf of the South Wales Police, my ‘machine gun’ privileged legal papers together with my clothes & wheel chairs. Someone clearly needs a visit.

and now a touch of England you so detest

I again invite feedback from the general public, especially from others that have suffered under South Wales injustice. I have already received on phone, emails and comments on my regular blogs depicting the sheer scale of South Wales Police’s malicious criminal conduct to pervert the course of justice .

Oh what fun…my appeal is being blocked, it would appear.

The subtle difference between my knowledge and the learned judge’s assumption, is that I have found over near 30 years of my life in that hell hole Wales of court deceit, is that I have now been accused by a judge of lying, I sold a film prop for film , Gunbus, when knowing the replica 1916 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun was a prohibited weapon!

Where is the logic in that?

Belinda Kirk

7h  · My book has been nominated for Outdoor Book Of The Year https://www.tgomagazine.co.uk/…/shortlists-announced…/🙏😁 Please can you vote for me … See moreTGOMAGAZINE.CO.UKVote now in The Great Outdoors Reader Awards 2021! | TGO MagazineWe’ve received hundred

War fears explode as 16 Chinese fighter jets enter Taiwan’s airspace – island on alert

My dear friends of Taipei flying club is there anything I can do for you in UK re Chinese aggression?

My memories of my film talk in the pub and horrendous departure, next daym in a cub in a torrential storm to South Korea are vivid!!!!!!!!

Breton cottage for just £55,000

Norman Scarth RN

A victim of such a corrupt UK legal system

Christopher Fogarty19:12 (10 minutes ago)
to Mary

Norman Scarth 96 years of age, lives in Ireland, a political refugee from England.

He had operated an equestrian business in Leeds until a politically-connected customer falsely sued him and won the case. Norman appealed the case to the top of Britain’s judicial system; unsuccessfully.
By then, indigent, he took his case, pro se, to the European Court of Human Rights where he not only won, but that court also ordered Britain to cease conducting secret trials.

Upon Norman’s return, victorious, to Leeds, his troubles really began. Norman’s support for the Inland Revenue-robbed Irishman Patrick Cullinane and others targeted by British State criminals may have been a factor  He was raided in his home by some nineteen constables who claimed that Norman, a 120 pound septuagenarian, had injured one of them. They managed to convict him of criminal assault and he was incarcerated for years in a prison for the criminally insane until prison psychiatrists managed to force the gov’t to release him. Once freed, Norman was subject to yet more crimes by the constabulary. He eventually fled England to Ireland where he has lived for the past few decades.

Please forward this to any English pol who might be interested in justice.
Chris

AND ANOTHER

Dear Sir,

Thank  you for your email, for your information I have set out below a brief outline of my case circumstances and the Irregularities and injustice involved in my issues with the SWP and its Senior Leadership Miscreants. 

Suffering from Work Overload for a considerable period of time – Senior Management disregarded the fact – although following my departure TWO Police Officers were seconded into the Licensing Department – ACC Lewis went on record (Media Wales) stating that “The Cardiff Licensing Department was the busiest Licensing Department in the U K”.

Well documented periods of sickness – stress and anxiety.

Wrongly accused of criminality by two unreliable Criminal Informants.

Operation Kansas – was a lengthy (eighteen months duration) and costly (profligacy) unfounded Police Surveillance Operation that was mounted against me.

Civil Liberties – Despite enshrined Human Rights Laws – Article 8 and 10 of the ECHR – Breaches of RIPA 2000 were carried out against me which was a complete misuse of Anti-terror Laws – there was no evidence, grounds / basis to allow for the level of surveillance that took place. An Abuse of Power.

This abuses included unlawful Directed and Intrusive Surveillance and telecoms interception under the guise of RIPA 2000 which was carried out by a corrupt and disgraced Professional Standards Department.

The grounds given to the ‘Delegated Officer’ for the Authorisations and Renewals of the Police Surveillance were all manufactured / fabricated and regularly changed when there was NO evidence to warrant any further Police Surveillance in order to accommodate further surveillance to be unlawfully carried out by the SWP.

This surveillance included listening devices planted in my home, telecoms interception of my Private Telephone calls, my Police Office, etc.

SWP – PSD / ACU committed PERJURY in respect of applications made to Judge for for a ‘Production Order’ and in an application to a Magistrate for a ‘Search Warrant’. It has been suggested to me that the ‘Search Warrant’ issued by a Magistrate to search my home was NOT in fact for that purpose but to recover the unlawfully placed SWP surveillance equipment – without compromise? 

After some 18 months of unlawful surveillance – no evidence of any criminality was ever found – as there was none to find.

Please see the case of: Mark Dias and Steve Mathews – Cleveland PoliceBreaches of RIPA 2000 aconspiracy to ruin lives – 2017.

Please also see the case of : Johnny Johnson – SWP  ‘A series of Mistruths’: How evidence against hero cop cleared of assault charge was described – 2014

Then without any evidence of any wrongdoing the SWP carried out ‘Unlawful Arrests’ on me my wife and others.

When there was NO evidence of any criminal offences disclosed – so the SWP then introduce HMRC and alleged – Tax Evasion.

There is an irregularity in respect of the HMRC investigation – HMRC state that they were NOT involved in any investigation against me or my wife until some six months after our arrests – so does this mean that the PACE Recorded interview which was conducted by a person who purported to be a Greg Jones of HMRC – was bogus?

HMRC will NOT confirm where Greg Jones works from and will NOT provide me with any copies of the NOTES made by Greg Jones allegedly from HMRC (contrary to the DPA / GDPR) that were made during the first PACE Recorded Interview with him and one SWP – PSD Officer. So was Greg Jones an imposter?  

Tax Evasion. – however, following THREE subsequent interviews with a confirmed HMRC Investigator my wife and my Tax Affairs were found to be completely in order, no criminal or civil offences disclosed and NO penalties imposed. 

Cover up at all costs – a witch-hunt then ensued – an unlawful targeting – look for anything to justify the SWP’s unlawful actions carried out against me and others.

A Kangaroo Court – (Secret Court) – some time later a Gross – Misconduct Allegation Hearing took place against me which was has since been established to be a patently obvious breach of the Home Office – Police (Conduct) Regulations in respect of the constitution of the Misconduct PANEL an absolute ‘Conflict of Interest’ situation, a breach of the Rule against Bias, Statutory Conspiracy, Misconduct in Public Office, Pervert the Course of Justice, Obstruction of Justice, etc. 

A Kangaroo Court (Secret Court) – Civil Liberties – Article 6 of the ECHR – evidence to my benefit was missing or never produced, I was denied access to witnesses, evidence both medical and otherwise was discounted without any evidence ever being produced by the SWP – PSD to refute or rebut my submission – such actions by the SWP have only brought the Police Misconduct Allegation Hearing process into – DISREPUTE. 

Minimum effort on the part of the SWPF / PFEW appointed Solicitor and Barrister – don’t try to hard we want to ensure the end result – DISMISSAL – I was dismissed for what was said to be Gross – Misconduct which was an Abuse of Process and a Miscarriage of Justice.

Gross – Misconduct is NOT clearly defined and appears to be open ended and is therefore wide open to professional and personal abuse and is a misuse of the already too elastic ‘Balance of Probability’. 

Isolated and abandoned by my so called representative body the SWPF / PFEW (I’m Alright Jack) I was informed by the SWPF – Secretary that there was NO more Police Federation Legal Funding for me for any Appeals against my dismissal and or an Employment Tribunal.

I am a Chief Constable I can do what I like. I was failed by the SWP – Senior Leadership and its Crime Commissioner – Alun Michael who acted unlawfully and ultra vires – beyond their powers in denying me an Appeal against my dismissal from the SWP and in some other matters.

I was failed by the Home Office appointed Chair of the Police Appeals Tribunal – Mr Richard Merz in respect of my deeply flawed and perverse Gross – Misconduct Hearing and in my subsequent application for a Police Appeal Tribunal process. Despite there being ‘New Evidence’ available.

I was failed by the Home Office appointed Head of the Wales Region of the IOPC – Catrin Evans and Co in respect of my complaints made to the IOPC of criminality with the SWP – PSD and its Senior Leadership. The IOPC alleges that it oversees the Police Complaints system and sets the standards by which the Police SHOULD handle complaints – the IOPC is NOT fit for purpose.

Delay and concealment – I was denied access to specific data – breaches of the DPA / GDPR, PACE, Police Reform Act, etc.

I was failed by the recommended Crown appointed Information Commissioners Office – Elizabeth Denham and Co – in respect of my complaints to them about breaches of the DPA / GDPR against the SWP – the ICO alleges that they uphold information rights in the public interest, promoting OPENNESS by public bodies and data privacy for individuals – the ICO is NOT fit for purpose.

I was provided with copies of my PACE Recorded Interview by the SWP. However, that CD copy had been edited and extracts had been removed. I have thus far been denied access by the SWP to the Master CD of my Pace Recorded Interviews – in order that I may make a comparison – Spoliation / Tampering with Evidence, Statutory Conspiracy, Misconduct in Public Office, Pervert the Course of Justice, Obstruction of Justice, etc, etc which is a recurring theme within the SWP who have history of being discredited in Major Investigations.

Lies and Deceit – a cover up, mind boggling incompetence, dishonesty, leadership failings, cronyism, profligacy, persistent and malicious lawbreaking, blame avoidance, stifle accountability, minimise reputational damage and an unsavoury tendency to use precious police resources and public funds to smear, bully, vex, annoy and harass critics.

The propensity to cover up rather than address or rectify, the SWP’s many failings is constant and at times seriously shocking, steeped in rotten culture. There is an absence of ‘Portfolio Responsibilities’ and ‘Accountability’.

A. Roach.  

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

South Wales Police G4S Robbery Hushed Up

Such is the level of deceit within Gold Group’s Chief Constable in Bridgend police HQ, just over the wall of Park Prison, I can find no MP allowed to receive reply from G4S concerning the return of my stolen property when violently ejected by eight G4S prison staff on 1st November 2019.

Remember , G4S was instructed to steal my 1CF03361 ‘machinegun’ court papers as they reveal widespread fraud within Dolmans solicitors who sat in in on the many MAPPA 3/3 and Gold Group hearing in the HQ in order, if possible to have me shot (see leaked committee contemporaneous notes).

HM Speaker of The House of Commons

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/19687966.maurice-kirk-considering-standing-taunton-deane-general-election

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/19687966.maurice-kirk-considering-standing-taunton-deane-general-election

Westminster

https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/19687966.maurice-kirk-considering-standing-taunton-deane-general-election

London SW1 1AA

31st October 2021

Dear Sir,

I apologise for taking up any of your very busytime but I have nowhere else to turn to as the Exeter Crown Court directed me to email my constituency member of parliament for help over my ignored South Wales Police statement of complaint (incident number incident number1900418801).

(Extract)

10th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff

I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions……..

Sir Lindsey Hoyle, none of my letters to my MP have been replied to.

I therefore asked my past MP, Alun Cairns MP but he also ignores my letters. I turned to my then temporary parliamentary representative for North Devon, Ms Selaine Saxby MP.

Ms Saxby immediately wrote to the G4S barbarically run Welsh prison, where the brutal robbery took place and has also between repeatedly ignored, of course, ever since.

Please, can anyone else, of any political persuasion, take on the Taffia for my property back which include two wheelchairs, clothes and current Cardiff County Court and RCJ ‘machinegun’ legal papers?

Thankyou

Yours faithfully,

Maurice j Kirk BVSc

Taunton, Somerset, England.

REPLY

From: HOC Enquiries <HCEnquiries@parliament.uk>
Sent: 02 November 2021 15:37
To: 
Subject: RE: FAO The Speaker of the House 

Dear Maurice

Thank you for sending us your letter marked for the attention of Mr Speaker.

However, as you do not live in Mr Speaker’s constituency, this office would normally reply in the first instance.

It will help you to know that MPs will only normally be able to help their own constituents. Therefore, if you are living temporarily in the North Devon constituency, you may wish to go back to Selaine Saxby MP’s office and ask that they persist with your case by taking this matter up with the ministers or officials at the Ministry of Justice on your behalf, or by referring your case to the Parliamentary Ombudsman?

If, however, you are based in Taunton you should contact your current MP there to do this for you. You can confirm who your MP is by typing your current postcode into the box at: Find MPs – MPs and Lords – UK Parliament

Should you still wish to contact Mr Speaker directly, you can of course do so to: speakersoffice@parliament.uk

I hope this is helpful.

Very best wishes

Jean

 
House of Commons Enquiry Service
House of Commons | London | SW1A 0AA
0800 112 4272 (Freephone) | 020 7219 4272
Text Relay: 18001 followed by our full number
And so the the apparent ‘treacle treatment’ continues

HM Speaker of The House of Commons

Westminster

London SW1 1AA

3rd November 2021

Dear Jean,

I am most grateful for such a swift reply.

My designated MP has ignored all my letters for years so Selaine Haxby MP tried to recover my significant stolen property from G4S run Park prison, on my behalf and was also completely ignored.

In the old day’s with similar problems of ‘misfeasance in a public office’ criminal conduct another MP was allocated by the Speaker’s office or by some similar such branch of Parliament.

Do I really have to resort to the Taunton police, again, over this proven fraud, theft and some one continuing to live off ‘immoral earnings’ from the proceeds of crime?

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Operation Bridger Police come to Arrest Twice in a Week

Sir Lindsay Hoyle MP, tonight, blocked my application for an MP allocation re G4S South Wales Police  ‘machine gun’ robbery

In the light of the Speaker of the House’s refusal, today, to allocate an appropriate MP to ask obvious questions over the vicious robbery, two years ago today by G4S Park prison to steal my legal files, re South Wales Police’ chief constable’s ‘machine gun conspiracy, my current intention is to represent Taunton Deane as ‘what really is going on’ in our law courts and community that needs radical reform?.

IS IT TRUE THAT WE HAVE A GENERAL ELECTION SOONER THAN LATER?

.Maurice seeks help from Mr Speaker from HM House of Commons

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL                                                REF. NO.

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

THE QUEEN

– v –

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

_____________________________________________________________

AMENDED GROUNDS OF APPEAL AGAINST THE
MAKING OF A RESTRAINING ORDER

_____________________________________________________________

DRAFT REDACTED VERSION

(These grounds have been prepared with the assistance of lay McKenzie advisers assisting Mr. Kirk with Mr. Kirk’s permission, who was unrepresented at the trial and conducted his own defence.)

APPEAL AGAINST THE MAKING OF A RESTRAINING ORDER UNDER SECTION 5A(5)(A),(B) OF THE PROTECTION OF HARASSMENT ACT 1997

  1. The Appellant was acquitted of 1 count of Harassment by Stalking, contrary to section 2A(a),(b) of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 before HHJ Johnson and a jury at the Crown Court at Exeter on 20th May 2021.
  • At the conclusion of the trial, HHJ Johnson imposed a Restraining Order for a limited time against the Appellant under section 5A(1) of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 on the same date in respect of an MP.
  • The Appellant now seeks leave to appeal against the making of that Restraining Order as though it had been made on his conviction as part of his sentence under section 5A(1),(5)(a),(b) of the Protection of Harassment Act 1997.

GROUNDS OF APPEAL

LACK OF PROPER REASONS JUSTIFYING THE MAKING OF THE RESTRAINT ORDER

  • It is contended that although the learned Judge applied the correct civil standard of proof on a balance of probabilities in making the Restraining Order against him, the learned Judge failed to give sufficient reasons for the making of the Order, in view of the fact that the Appellant had been acquitted of the charge against him by the jury.
  • In particular, the learned Judge failed to identify the acts or any specific acts in relating to the Appellant’s conduct that in his view would have justified the Restraining Order being made against the Appellant.

ARTICLE 10(1) ECH, HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998

  • The learned Judge erred in law and/or in principle in directing that the Appellant may not publish anything concerning an MP, thereby interfering with the Appellant’s “right to freedom of expression” under article 10(1) ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998.
  • Further, the learned Judge failed to take into account or consider the Appellant’s “Convention Rights” and in particular his “right to freedom of expression” under article 10(1) ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998 when making the Restraining Order against him.
  • The prohibition against the Appellant from publishing anything about an MP restrains the Appellant from commenting on the competence and reliability of an MP, when such matters as to her conduct in not responding to the Appellant’s requests to her and her constituency officer for help is a matter of public interest and importance regarding the democratic system and accountability of elected MPs to their electorates.
  • In the premises, the making of the Restraining Order against the Appellant was disproportionate and was not “prescribed by law, or “necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary” for the purposes of article 10(2) ECHR, Human Rights Act 1998.

MEDICAL REASONS AND GROUNDS

  1. During the Exeter hearing before the learned Judge, the Appellant experienced medical problems that he had not experienced before and medical evidence will be sent to the court regarding this.
  1. The outcome of the Atrial Fibrillation caused the Appellant confusion and with the loss of the Appellant’s hearing aids at the hearing, the Appellant was deprived of a clear understanding of the relevance of a Restraining Order being required following an obviously predicted acquittal. (The CPS had conceded the Appellant sent only two letters to an MP, which is not correct and were a year apart!).
  1. During the morning of 10th May 2021, the Appellant had to go to the accident and emergency Department of Exeter Hospital by ambulance from the court, and the learned Judge was informed regarding this, so that the proceedings did not resume until the afternoon session.
  1. The Appellant’s condition caused memory loss with the lack of oxygen to his brain for proper concentration so that he was unable to comprehend the circumstances of the order being sought.

Dated 28th Oct 2021

Signed

MAURICE JOHN KIRK

Appellant in Person

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

I am arrested for ‘Threatening’ an MP

My emails for an MP’s help, re G4S robbery to my Parliament building, are being blocked .. . I will therefore have to jump to PLAN J

At the Conservative Party’s London HQ yesterday, despite a judge’s directions, I was again refused an MP to act on my behalf concerning the Wales G4S robbery to steel my legal papers against Gold Group chief, Barbara Wilding, because the then HM Secretary of State, Alun Cairns MP, was sent from my prison cell what was believed to be heroin we were told. I was further gaoled for a further five months for apparently sending what was believed to be anthrax spores to another MP

Could Enid Blyton have written a better fairy tale?

HM Speaker of The House of Commons

Westminster

London SW1 1AA

31st October 2021

Dear Sir,

I apologise for taking up any of your very busytime but I have nowhere else to turn to as the Exeter Crown Court directed me to email my constituency member of parliament for help over my ignored South Wales Police statement of complaint (incident number incident number1900418801).

(Extract)

10th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff

I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions……..

Sir Lindsey Hoyle, none of my letters to my MP have been replied to.

I therefore asked my past MP, Alun Cairns MP but he also ignores my letters. I turned to my then temporary parliamentary representative for North Devon, Ms Selaine Saxby MP.

Ms Saxby immediately wrote to the G4S barbarically run Welsh prison, where the brutal robbery took place and has also between repeatedly ignored, of course, ever since.

Please, can anyone else, of any political persuasion, take on the Taffia for my property back which include two wheelchairs, clothes and current Cardiff County Court and RCJ ‘machinegun’ legal papers?

Thankyou

Yours faithfully,

Maurice j Kirk BVSc

Taunton, Somerset, England.

Even my political party appears not to help

Defendant’s Legal Submission

      An idle MP and Maurice John Kirk were like ‘two ships passing in the night’

Extracts from 1997 Prevention of Harassment Act

Prohibition of harassment

  • A person must not pursue a course of conduct— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
  • Subsection (1) [ F4or (1A)] does not apply to a course of conduct if the person who pursued it shows— (a) that it was pursued for the purpose of preventing or detecting crime,

2 Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (c. 40) Document Generated: 2021-03-25 Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. (See end of Document for details) (b) that it was pursued under any enactment or rule of law or to comply with any condition or requirement imposed by any person under any enactment, or (c) that in the particular circumstances the pursuit of the course of conduct was reasonable.

The fundamental issue was an ‘objective’ one while both parties in the case had quite different ‘subjective’ beliefs much based  on ‘hearsay’

The 1st November 2019 robbery of the Defendant, by staff of G4S Custodial Services in HMP Parc, Bridgend, South Wales, resulted in the loss of the South Wales Police’s victim’s personality.

The victim’s stolen ‘personalty’ includes:

  1. his clothes
  2. his shoes
  3. his two wheelchairs
  4. legal papers including from his civil claim 1CF03361 (trading in machine gun conspiracy)
  5. his BS614159 papers resulting from 40 odd failed police malicious criminal prosecutions
  6. his 3 years of NHS (Wales) record currently being requested by his GP, cardiac and gastroenterologist specialists in Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, Somerset
  7. his full 2009/10 records from Glanrhyd Hospital’s Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, resulting from three months of horrific incarceration under section 35 of 1983 Mental Health Act.

At Conservative Party HQ, yesterday, I was refused an MP to act on my behalf concerning the G4S robbery to steel my legal papers against Gold Group chief, Barbara Wilding, because then Secretary of State, Alun Cairns MP, was sent from my prison cell what was believed to be heroin we were told.

10th Jan 2020 Complaint against HMP Parc South Wales G4S Staff

I, Maurice John Kirk, file complaints against HMP Parc, Bridgend, G4S custody staff for their seriously inflicting injuries, harassment and false imprisonment to cause numerous thefts of my possessions.

Serious Assaults   (Article 3)                                                                             Incident 1900418801

  1. After my Feb 2019 unlawful ‘recall’ to prison from a Cardiff parole hostel I was assaulted on numerous occasions in Parc prison with one incident already reported over the ‘floor buffer’  on A2 wing. All required medical attention and captured on CCTV & body cameras. 
  2. The 2nd filmed significant assault was in June 2019 when I was forcibly removed from my 2nd missing wheel chair by unnecessary force from seven officers carrying me back to B block.
  3. The 3rd main incident was in Nov 2019 when I was snatched from my cell by unprovoked excessive force using no less than eight G4S officers using handcuffs on my wrists behind my back. This deliberate pain was inflicted from B wing to the main gate where I was ‘released’ for Bristol Royal Infirmary attention. This included x-rays due to my hip prosthesis having suffered partial subluxation of my hip joint and prescription analgesics for a month.
  4. The incidents have left me feeling severely intimidated, vulnerable and in constant pain.

Deliberate False Forensic History Yet Again (Article 6)

  1. In Sept & Dec18 G4S had inadvertently released Caswell Clinic medical data by fabricated police criminal convictions including ‘child abuse’, ‘firearms’, ‘narcotics’, ABH and ‘FTA’.
  2. Oct 19 HM Parole Board hearing, with evidence from a retired magistrate, had also revealed why a prison had needed such violent ‘constraints’. Both parole officer & prison supervisors had vehemently opposed release as I was, ‘violent and extremely dangerous’. To whom was I a danger, exactly, turned out to be only the Chief Constable? This caused my swift release.
  3. That CCTV and more leaked 2009 Barry police station MAPPA level 3 category 3 data of Barbara Wilding’s conspiracy, to have me shot, is applied for to be disclosed at the ‘machine gun’ hearing on 24th January as it all identifies the original culprit’s nefarious conduct. 

‘Heroin’ to Alun Cairns MP & ‘Anthrax Spores’ to another MP false Allegations  (Article 8)

  1. My Feb 19 release was due so police concocted reasons to stop my mail in and out of Cardiff & Parc prisons to protract time in prison and delay my civil claims. The ‘white powder’ found in my two MP letters had simply been remaining traces of toothpaste originally used for gluing exhibits onto my cell wall when originals had been stolen by my key liaison officer.

Further Deliberate Theft of my Possessions (Article 7)

Despite my pleadings and requests by parole staff G4S continues to refuse to return my wheelchair and legal papers as the latter is needed, of course, for my 10am 24th January 2020 civil court proceedings against both G4S and the South Wales Police. Today’s MG11 VPS written complaint to very patient South Wales police officers will, no doubt, end up in the police HQ shredder as did the ones, re police paint gun, to try and fool the 2010 jury!

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Judge Petts Appears to be a Flagrant Liar as well as me?

When I am in France phone me on whatsapp 07708586202

I again invite feedback from the general public, especially from others that have suffered under South Wales injustice. I have already received on phone, emails and comments on my regular blogs depicting the sheer scale of South Wales Police’s malicious criminal conduct to pervert the course of justice .

Oh what fun…my appeal is being blocked, it would appear.

The subtle difference between my knowledge and the learned judge’s assumption, is that I have found over near 30 years of my life in that hell hole Wales of court deceit, is that I have now been accused by a judge of lying, I sold a film prop for film , Gunbus, when knowing the replica 1916 Battle of the Somme Lewis machine gun was a prohibited weapon!

There is the logic in that?

I will start with HHJ Petts 15th September 2021 judgment in my long running 1CF03361 civil claim:

Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>06:54 (1 hour ago)
Maurice seeks help from a friend

1.  Has DL received a written reply, he promised me from Litts, gunsmiths of Newport, that ‘no work’ was done on dummy gun after trial before posting it on to Birmingham Proof House for what?


2.  Para 34? By judge Petts was DISHONESTLY written when knowing it was all proven as Respondent’s pack of lies by  QC (Quaintly Corrupted) and the South Wales Police from unlawfully  late witness statements and civil claim cross examination evidence …. You were there in court so please confirm for an outside Police force and Bar Council?


 3.  Can you confirm DL,  in your presence, telephoned Litts who stated they did no work on ‘dummy gun’ nor were allowed to?


4.  The police had sent the ‘dummy gun’ to ‘Chepstow’ (Litts?) as the criminal jury had picked up early on, as eight of them confirmed in the pub after my acquittal, as an obvious deliberate smoke screen.
5.   RAF experts and others, never disclosed in trial or to me, had already voiced opinion that the prosecution exhibit was a dummy WW1 Lewis machine-gun that ‘looked like a dummy’, ‘worked like a dummy’ and  ‘quacked like a dummy’ for instruction or for educational purposes only but never a ‘ prohibited weapon’!


4.  Can you confirm DL, as instructed, wrote asking for Birmingham Proof House evidence and had a reply that ‘no work’ was needed to decommission the dummy gun as it was,  at most, a 0.410 single shot shotgun with a condemned smooth bore barrel too wide for 0.303 machine-gun rounds?

i5.  AND most important of all, where is the evidence this deceitful judge Petts relied upon stating in his judgment, drafted before trial,  that I was the liar?

MY CAR BEING SEARCHED FOR MACHINE GUNS AT POLICE HQ ON VERY DAY GOLD GROUP AND DOLMANS SOLICITORS WHER2 HAVING ONE OF THEIR UNLAWFUL WEEKLY MEETINGS CONSPIRING TO JUSTYING MY BEING MAPPA 3/3 SHOT ON THE 21ST JUNE 2009 PLANNED POLICE HELICDOPTER RAID WITH 20 OD TO D COPPERS SURROUNDING OUR HOUSE TO SNATCH INTO CARE OUR THEN 10 YEAR OLD GENEVIEVE

????

Rogues Gallery must include police blackmailed Caswell Clinic mentally ill, diagnosed and NHS sacked, police psychiatrist who, without my being allowed even attendance to Cardiff ‘s secret Crown Court, as not legally represented, told the 2nd Dec 2009 judge Bidder QC I was so ill, with possible cancer causing significant brain damage, I needed locking away, for life, in Ashworth’s high security psychiatric hospital.

So, why was I made to stand trial?

Celia, Judge Keazer, above, with Petts denied me either the seller or buyer of the AJR1 prosecution exhibit (alleged prohibited weapon) AT CIVIL TRIAL, the eight jury, remember, almost split their sides over in laughter. In the jury 2010 criminal trial they asked why was not Mr Gerry Cooper and David Woodford not both in the dock along side me, as ‘being in possession’?

Real Enid Blyton stuff Mum used to read to us so long ago.

A proverbial usual ‘can of worms’?

The level of deceit in the welsh judiciary with no central government intervention points me to leaving the UK as Norman Scarth did, for good as it is not safe as another cooked-up prison term will deny me my medication again.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

I appeal South Wales Police Machine-gun Conspiracy

As predicted in such a thoroughly corrupt welsh judiciary my eleven year running civil claim against the South Wales Police machine gun bloody nonsense conspiracy, the T2009745  criminal jury laughed out of court despite the police plant amongst them they told us about in the Cardiff pub afterwards. I now appeal with the aid of a barrister who has appeared to have poked his head over the parapet!

AS PREDICTED, SOUTH WALES POLICE ARE AGAIN BLOCKING MY  REVEALING VIDEOS

In the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre                                                  1CF03361

                                      MAURICE JOHN KIRK                              Claimant

                                                        V

                   THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES        Defendant 

———————————————————————————————–

CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSIONS CONCERNING RESPONDENT’S REQUEST

                            FOR A CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER

———————————————————————————————–        

  1. The relevant practice direction is Practice Direction 3C, which provides for three kinds of civil restraint order, a limited civil restraint order, an extended civil restraint order and a general civil restraint order. A limited order may be made where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit.

An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit.’

A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate.’

  • The Defendant cites the order of Morgan J in BS614159, an order some 8 years old. In fact an application was subsequently lodged before Newey J by the writer and that learned judge made no such criticism. They cite the order of Tipples J dated the 3rd September 2021 and the order of HHJ Petts dated the 17th September 2021 refusing the Claimant’s application for witness summonses and specific disclosure.

The ‘without merit threshold’

  • The Defendant relies on Ghassemian Hamila Sartipy (Aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc (2019)EWCA Civ 225 a case wherein the Appellants had perpetrated fraud on both the Respondents and the court and whose application was manifestly bogus. That is not the situation here.
  • It is averred the Respondents have had conduct of one of the most shameful  chapters in the history of South Wales Police after the Lynette White Cardiff 5 trial. It is accepted that the Claimant has become overtly suspicious of judges and lawyers, has been constrained to litigate in person because of the sheer enormity and costs implications of the task before him and has frequently used florid language in accusing judges, courts and the police of being in partnership against him. None of these factors should be held against him against the highly unusual and alarming circumstances of BS614159 and 1CF03361 which, if they had been visited on any  other single human being would have undoubtedly caused a reasonable onlooker, armed with the facts, to conclude all the Claimant’s claims were both meritorious and justified.
  • The Claimant was a practising vet and highly respected, even employed by South Wales Police. He was a daredevil aviator but one whom the Civil Aviation Authority saw fit to allow to fly and participate (as recently as 2016) in Vintage Air Rallies. Notwithstanding representations by The Defendant that the Claimant brought prosecutions upon himself the Defendant managed to attempt to arrest, charge or prosecute him on no less than 33 occasions and each attempt was wholly without merit (BS614159). The Claimant invited a holistic approach, even pleading that 1CF03361 was the ‘end-game’ of BS614159. He was to be disappointed. The sheer volume of material before it persuaded the court there ought to be two trials and not one. His Honour Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC faced a daunting task but invited each incident to proceed as though in isolation of all the others permitting witnesses  each time to deny their knowing Maurice John Kirk so there was no ‘over-arching’ conspiracy to do him down. With the deepest of respect, that was not necessarily the realistic approach. On oath during the recent trial in 1CF03361 DC Stuart Davies accepted most police officers were certain to have heard of the famous flying vet, Maurice John Kirk. The statistical probability of 33 incidents all being pure accidents prompted Mr. Justice Jack to question the sheer volume as heposed the question  what is going on?    
  • The Claimant does not accept the judgment in BS614159. Would any other person in his shoes? Does that make his applications to appeal without merit? Surely not. Matters progressed with 1CF03361. In that matter the Claimant’s case was that the case notes of Operation Chalice revealed South Wales Police resurrected the Claimant having a vintage aeroplane as BS614159’s trial date approached. They prosecuted his having a prohibited weapon with extreme prejudice. The timing was significant. Case notes purported to show officers conspicuously and suspiciously searching the Claimant’s legal papers in search of evidence of a gun sale 12 months in the past so as to preserve the integrity of the organisation. The Defendant denied the magistrates’ decision to grant the Claimant bail and procured his remand in custody for no less than eight months.
  • Matters took a more sinister turn. On the 8th June 2009 at Barry Police Station (the hub of all activity in BS614159) a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) set in motion a categorisation of the Claimant that was wholly unjustified. As someone who was MAPPA 3 he was now a danger to himself and others. A psychiatric report by a tame expert could have resulted in the Claimant being incarcerated in a mental institution for life. That tame expert’s report was contradicted over the years that followed by no less than five other psychiatric reports. What would the proverbial ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’ make of all this?
  • Inevitably the Claimant was acquitted. This case was brought by the Claimant who invited the court to consider the following matters:
  • Mr. Rydeard (Forensic Expert) accepted he had in his many years witnessed only a handful of collectors such as The Claimant prosecuted in this way. Why was he?
  • Former Detective Superintendent McKenzie accepted he instigated MAPPA  so why did the court find he ‘mis-spoke’? Why was this admission ignored?
  • If the ‘machine gun’ had been a real automatic why were Home Office ACPO Guidelines  against prosecution in the public interest not adhered to? Why did the court not allow the Claimant to rely on these as part of his case when they had both been pleaded and served in October 2020 by him?   
  • Section 58 Firearms Act 1968 provided a statutory defence to the Claimant. There was no way of showing the Claimant as opposed to others modernised the exhibit. Three witnesses attested to the fact that the gun had been tampered with.
  • The Defendant could provide no explanation as to why the gun appeared to go to Chepstow Forensic Science Services. Did the Police make the gun capable of firing? A crucial witness did not attend trial suspiciously yet his evidence was accepted by the court even though the Claimant challenged his evidence.
  • Firearms expert Mr. Rydeard said ‘once a machine gun always a machine gun’. The exhibit could not be ‘down-graded’ by subsequent modification. When confronted by the Birmingham Proof House certification the exhibit was a ‘single shot gun’  both Mr. Rydeard and the court  leapt on the explanation Litts the Sportsman had a capacity to modify the gun when there was evidence this certainly was not the case.
  • It is true the Claimant further feels aggrieved that his request for trial by jury was formally pleaded by him as long ago as 2011 and yet he was denied. He argued the Defendant be estopped from denying him his statutory right by dint of their pleaded response in their 2011 Defence. The Particulars of Claim were amended and a fresh Defence permitted. It was disingenuous to say that request was ten years old.
  1. Of course any litigant in the Claimant’s position would seek to obtain redress. If these claims and applications were without merit  then why were they allowed to go to trial by senior judges exercising their court management powers? Why was the machine gun case kept alive for in excess of ten years? Why was the Defendant afforded the luxury of Leading Counsel at great public expense if all one was fronted with were the ramblings of an idiot?
  1. Most disturbing of all, why was the Defendant’s continued conduct in having the Claimant incarcerated in recent years (again without merit MP Exeter Crown Court prosecution) permitted to prevail so that the Claimant was denied Relief from Sanctions when he was incarcerated and documentary evidence served on the court showed they had stolen all his case papers whilst in prison?
  1. The Claimant renewed Leave to Appeal The Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey’s refusal to grant Relief from Sanctions and to allow the Claimant trial by jury. Great play is made of the observations of Tipples J on the 3rd September. With the deepest of respect if, as claimed by the Learned Judge, the Claimant had failed to request an oral hearing why any hearing before Tipples J at all? Why did the Defendant file a document entitled Respondent’s skeleton Argument for Oral Permission Hearing 3rd September 2021?  The Claimant will aver matters were not assisted by the fact his legal representative could neither hear not understand Tipples J because of technical difficulties.
  1. In conclusion, if any ECRO is granted the court merely compounds the Claimant’s overall position that he was deprived of the right to call evidence, deprived a fair trial and all the indicia of bias he is told are but phantoms of his mind are, regrettably, fact.

David Jonathan Leathley

29th September 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

MP ignores

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/sacked-police-officer-launches-le

gal-17149915

Conservative Party Head Office

London                                                                                                                   29th September 2021

Dear Sir/Madam

My MP is still ignoring my letters for help over South Wales Police G4S Robbery

Despite guidance from my judge, His Honour Judge Johnson in Exeter Crown Court, for me to write to my MP with regards to the brutal attack in HMP Park, Bridgend, to steel my ‘machine gun’ civil claim papers for the South Wales Police, I am continuously ignored.

I wonder just how many others in the constituency are being ignored by the same MP when their specific pleas for help are on matters as serious as mine?

There stands a restraining on me which is illegal as my two acts of writing for help were a year apart.

All my attempts to have a restraining order varied or quashed remain ignored by the courts. Such is the true state of our law courts should you be so bold or so stupid as to scrape off their thin layer of camouflage to expose, yet again, the ‘can of worms’ lurking beneath in our UK judiciary

The South Wales Police have consistently instigated barbarity, by G4S for example, ever since my Bristol lawyers, upon a comment from a Bristol judge, that Dolmans, solicitors for the Welsh police, should mediate and ‘settle out of court’ for losing over 40 now malicious criminal prosecutions.

Adrian Oliver of Dolman refuses each time or the taxpayer funded ‘gravy train’ will hit the buffers.

The masonic devil worshipping bunch in Bridgend’s police HQ were caught red handed in June 2009 when, while the deputy head of their legal department assisted me to their then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding’s private office, lo and behold was Adrian Oliver also attending, no doubt, for both Gold Group and MAPPA level 3 category 3 clandestine meeting to have me eliminated.

My ten year running BS614159 substantive civil claim, for the forty odd lost criminal prosecutions, was listed for trial that very summer and so  had to be stopped by their ‘machinegun’ conspiracy.

Hence the hurriedly arranged HQ MAPPA meeting on the very day I had accessed Wilding’s inner sanctum, to ‘exchange witness files’, only to be surrounded by machinegun tin hatted police sporting stun grenade laden flak jackets and itchy fingers. Real Enid ‘Noddy Land’ stuff had it not been so true

My two recent farcical South Wales Police instigated failed jury trials, in Exeter Crown Court, are so serious a miscarriage of justice, a restraining order had to be immediately applied to block ‘what really goes on’ in the dark corners of the House of Commons and damned the expense!

Just as in the Welsh police doctor’s fabricated 19th Oct 2009 psychiatric report, for my Ashworth incarceration for life, the tax payer must never find out that our UK law courts have nothing to do with the veracity of the presiding judge or HM Crown Prosecution Service as it is all run under ‘HM Partnership’, as Patrick Cullinane Esq so aptly coined it, a multimillion funded ‘ gravy train for those in the club all promised to immunity to prosecution , such as one Adrian Oliver and his entourage.

Will you help me, please or do I have to stand against an idle bitch living off immoral earnings?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

South Wales Police NOW ask for my new Restraining Order!

In the Cardiff Civil Justice Centre                                                  1CF03361

                                      MAURICE JOHN KIRK                              Claimant

                                                        V

                   THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES        Defendant 

———————————————————————————————–

CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSIONS CONCERNING RESPONDENT’S REQUEST

                            FOR A CIVIL RESTRAINT ORDER

———————————————————————————————–        

  1. The relevant practice direction is Practice Direction 3C, which provides for three kinds of civil restraint order, a limited civil restraint order, an extended civil restraint order and a general civil restraint order. A limited order may be made where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit.

An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit.’

A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate.’

  • The Defendant cites the order of Morgan J in BS614159, an order some 8 years old. In fact an application was subsequently lodged before Newey J by the writer and that learned judge made no such criticism. They cite the order of Tipples J dated the 3rd September 2021 and the order of HHJ Petts dated the 17th September 2021 refusing the Claimant’s application for witness summonses and specific disclosure.

The ‘without merit threshold’

  • The Defendant relies on Ghassemian Hamila Sartipy (Aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc (2019)EWCA Civ 225 a case wherein the Appellants had perpetrated fraud on both the Respondents and the court and whose application was manifestly bogus. That is not the situation here.
  • It is averred the Respondents have had conduct of one of the most shameful  chapters in the history of South Wales Police after the Lynette White Cardiff 5 trial. It is accepted that the Claimant has become overtly suspicious of judges and lawyers, has been constrained to litigate in person because of the sheer enormity and costs implications of the task before him and has frequently used florid language in accusing judges, courts and the police of being in partnership against him. None of these factors should be held against him against the highly unusual and alarming circumstances of BS614159 and 1CF03361 which, if they had been visited on any  other single human being would have undoubtedly caused a reasonable onlooker, armed with the facts, to conclude all the Claimant’s claims were both meritorious and justified.
  • The Claimant was a practising vet and highly respected, even employed by South Wales Police. He was a daredevil aviator but one whom the Civil Aviation Authority saw fit to allow to fly and participate (as recently as 2016) in Vintage Air Rallies. Notwithstanding representations by The Defendant that the Claimant brought prosecutions upon himself the Defendant managed to attempt to arrest, charge or prosecute him on no less than 33 occasions and each attempt was wholly without merit (BS614159). The Claimant invited a holistic approach, even pleading that 1CF03361 was the ‘end-game’ of BS614159. He was to be disappointed. The sheer volume of material before it persuaded the court there ought to be two trials and not one. His Honour Judge Seys-Llewellyn QC faced a daunting task but invited each incident to proceed as though in isolation of all the others permitting witnesses  each time to deny their knowing Maurice John Kirk so there was no ‘over-arching’ conspiracy to do him down. With the deepest of respect, that was not necessarily the realistic approach. On oath during the recent trial in 1CF03361 DC Stuart Davies accepted most police officers were certain to have heard of the famous flying vet, Maurice John Kirk. The statistical probability of 33 incidents all being pure accidents prompted Mr. Justice Jack to question the sheer volume as heposed the question  what is going on?    
  • The Claimant does not accept the judgment in BS614159. Would any other person in his shoes? Does that make his applications to appeal without merit? Surely not. Matters progressed with 1CF03361. In that matter the Claimant’s case was that the case notes of Operation Chalice revealed South Wales Police resurrected the Claimant having a vintage aeroplane as BS614159’s trial date approached. They prosecuted his having a prohibited weapon with extreme prejudice. The timing was significant. Case notes purported to show officers conspicuously and suspiciously searching the Claimant’s legal papers in search of evidence of a gun sale 12 months in the past so as to preserve the integrity of the organisation. The Defendant denied the magistrates’ decision to grant the Claimant bail and procured his remand in custody for no less than eight months.
  • Matters took a more sinister turn. On the 8th June 2009 at Barry Police Station (the hub of all activity in BS614159) a Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangement (MAPPA) set in motion a categorisation of the Claimant that was wholly unjustified. As someone who was MAPPA 3 he was now a danger to himself and others. A psychiatric report by a tame expert could have resulted in the Claimant being incarcerated in a mental institution for life. That tame expert’s report was contradicted over the years that followed by no less than five other psychiatric reports. What would the proverbial ‘man on the Clapham Omnibus’ make of all this?
  • Inevitably the Claimant was acquitted. This case was brought by the Claimant who invited the court to consider the following matters:
  • Mr. Rydeard (Forensic Expert) accepted he had in his many years witnessed only a handful of collectors such as The Claimant prosecuted in this way. Why was he?
  • Former Detective Superintendent McKenzie accepted he instigated MAPPA  so why did the court find he ‘mis-spoke’? Why was this admission ignored?
  • If the ‘machine gun’ had been a real automatic why were Home Office ACPO Guidelines  against prosecution in the public interest not adhered to? Why did the court not allow the Claimant to rely on these as part of his case when they had both been pleaded and served in October 2020 by him?   
  • Section 58 Firearms Act 1968 provided a statutory defence to the Claimant. There was no way of showing the Claimant as opposed to others modernised the exhibit. Three witnesses attested to the fact that the gun had been tampered with.
  • The Defendant could provide no explanation as to why the gun appeared to go to Chepstow Forensic Science Services. Did the Police make the gun capable of firing? A crucial witness did not attend trial suspiciously yet his evidence was accepted by the court even though the Claimant challenged his evidence.
  • Firearms expert Mr. Rydeard said ‘once a machine gun always a machine gun’. The exhibit could not be ‘down-graded’ by subsequent modification. When confronted by the Birmingham Proof House certification the exhibit was a ‘single shot gun’  both Mr. Rydeard and the court  leapt on the explanation Litts the Sportsman had a capacity to modify the gun when there was evidence this certainly was not the case.
  • It is true the Claimant further feels aggrieved that his request for trial by jury was formally pleaded by him as long ago as 2011 and yet he was denied. He argued the Defendant be estopped from denying him his statutory right by dint of their pleaded response in their 2011 Defence. The Particulars of Claim were amended and a fresh Defence permitted. It was disingenuous to say that request was ten years old.
  1. Of course any litigant in the Claimant’s position would seek to obtain redress. If these claims and applications were without merit  then why were they allowed to go to trial by senior judges exercising their court management powers? Why was the machine gun case kept alive for in excess of ten years? Why was the Defendant afforded the luxury of Leading Counsel at great public expense if all one was fronted with were the ramblings of an idiot?
  1. Most disturbing of all, why was the Defendant’s continued conduct in having the Claimant incarcerated in recent years (again without merit see Exeter Rebecca Pow prosecution) permitted to prevail so that the Claimant was denied Relief from Sanctions when he was incarcerated and documentary evidence served on the court showed he had stolen all his case papers whilst in prison?
  1. The Claimant renewed Leave to Appeal The Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey’s refusal to grant Relief from Sanctions and to allow the Claimant trial by jury. Great play is made of the observations of Tipples J on the 3rd September. With the deepest of respect if, as claimed by the Learned Judge, the Claimant had failed to request an oral hearing why any hearing before Tipples J at all? Why did the Defendant file a document entitled Respondent’s skeleton Argument for Oral Permission Hearing 3rd September 2021?  The Claimant will aver matters were not assisted by the fact his legal representative could neither hear not understand Tipples J because of technical difficulties.
  1. In conclusion, if any ECRO is granted the court merely compounds the Claimant’s overall position that he was deprived of the right to call evidence, deprived a fair trial and all the indicia of bias he is told are but phantoms of his mind are, regrettably, fact.

David Jonathan Leathley

29th September 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

WHAT REALY GOES ON IN OUR ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE

INTERIM ARTICLE for those following the wickedness of some in the South Wales Police now moving to the London law courts

. The MUSA article is to warn others our judiciary is not as it hopes to appear to be — I invite you to follow my route throughout the RCJ and European courts, over the next 5 years, all due to ‘devil worship’ rituals in Cardiff s law courts as it must always take precedent to the’ rule of law’ and the truth.

GOING BACK IN TIME [2011]: Fwd: MUSA BIG FILE Fw: FAO PAUL GARLICK QC

ExternalInbox

butlincatAttachments25 Sept 2021, 20:01 (12 hours ago)
to me, Terence, Hope

look what i found: from 2011:-   hunger strike in HMP by someone called “Maurice Kirk”, Highbury Corner court, …and more victimisation and corruption.
ps  the QC wrote to didn’t reply. Typical. Nobbled probably.


From: butlincat . <adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk>
Sent: 24 December 2011 23:50
To:clerks@furnivallaw.co.uk <clerks@furnivallaw.co.uk>
Cc: butlincat . <adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk>
Subject: FAO PAUL GARLICK QC Dear Mr. Garlick,
This letter is from myself, John Graham,  one of many supporters, friends and a Mckenzie friend to the Nigerian Musa family, before being evicted of Haringey, N. London.

I am writing hoping you can help as the situation since you parted from the case has dwindled down to a completely unacceptable position with the Musas now imprisoned since 31 Oct., having lost now 6 children on totally bogus allegations. During the week beginning the 31 Oct. a 6 day hearing effectively removed the baby, the 6th child, on evidence given to the court that can only be described as utter perversions of justice and lies. Injunctions forbid me as Mckenzie friend from relating the lies told to get the baby removed from the Musa parents.

I am am asking if you can please reinstate yourself into the case again to assist the Musas in their time of peril. They have never had adequate representation from the numerous solicitors and connected theyve previously had and even they are expressing their request for help in their letters from prison to supporters. So many from the legal profession are loathe to help them because of the actions Haringey council take upon these people trying to represent Musa, such that they are frightened off via various methods. Musa can elaborate more on this part of it and id rather he did.

One aspect of this case that is hardly ever mentioned is the appalling witness intimidation targetted at the Musas witnesses. I do not joke or hoax when i say i have met and spoken to at least 5 witnesses who have been strongly affected by Haringey council because of their supporting the Musas. Please take the time to read the affadavit of Kay Young {below}, who had to flee the UK because of this dubious councils social workers intended actions towards her. Another witness had to spend 4 months in an illegal alien detention centre on totally bogus evidence. Other witnesses, single mothers, have had their children removed, or had it threatened. All this is absolutely true.

If you can help the Musa family please could you let me know and I can take the appropriate steps to try and get the ball rolling.  The Musas have a commital to crown court hearing on the 28th Dec. at Highbury Corner magistrates court. My site http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com  tells of their story recently, with supporter Maurice Kirk actually going on hunger strike in Cardiff prison as part of his protest as to what has/is happening to the Musas. My site explains also the disappearance of Favour Musa, and her being sexually abused whilst in care. The letters i sent to the chief constable {attd.} + police, MPs + other “authority figures” about this matter has never received a satisfactory response or even a reply in the Chief Con’s case. It seems sexual abuse on a minor is allowable by the police, MPs + others written to too. It is appalling. Letters were sent to Theresa May and others by recorded delivery royal mail too about this abuse but still no reply has ever been recived. I have sent hundreds of emails to MPs + similar, as others have, to meet with a stony silence and no response whatsoever. I think it is quite apparent to some supporters who have investigeted this child seizing in the UK via mothers who have had children removed by councils {Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek,Eve Pears, + many more} that a child seizing network is in place which could very well cater for a paedophile network, either here or abroad.

Incidentally Maurice Kirk – pls see his site  www.kirkflyingvet.com – was arrested again on totally trumped up charges after giving evidence for the Musas at the bail app. hearing on Thursday 22 Dec., although the 2 events are only indirectly connected, Maurice having an injunction upon him to never communicate with the Musas. The police know what Maurice is capable of as his 20 year battle with the corrupt elements within the S Wales authorities show, and they will silence him at all costs. As i said he just spent 68 days on hunger strike in Cardiff prison before being released a couple of weeks ago. Whilst in Cardiff prison he was beaten badly by the prison officers, and the attempts to section him, a common ploy placed upon him in the past, was luckily unsuccessful. His many phone calls describing his treatment etc are on my wordpress site mentioned.

Please help if you can.

Thanks for your time and happy solstice.
 
J. Graham.
——————————————————————-
Affadavit from Kay Young:
STATEMENT FROM Kay Young 26 5 11
Witness “A” statement:
Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:18:10 +0100
I first became aware of this family’s plight when I received an e-mail asking me if I could assist the family. I made contact with Bishop Gloria – who – understandably – did not trust anyone. I then met her on 24 November in London (St Marks Hospita) after I had attended a Hospital appointment. This was the first time I spoke to her Social Worker, JOYCE AGYEKUM, who appeared to not understand Bishop Gloria (I had no problems understanding Gloria). I took the mobile from Bishop Gloira and started to talk to Ms Agyekum as I felt there were difficulties regarding ‘Contact arrangements between Bishop Gloria and the children’. I introduced myself as ‘Kay’ on the telephone to her (Ms Agyekum) and reminded her in accordance with the Children Act 1989 the LBH (London Borough of Harringey) had a duty to promote contact in the ‘best interests of the child/ren’. Ms Agyekum hung up on me. Bishop Gloria came to my home, with her husband a few days later (on a Saturday); I felt because she did not trust me, she may start to if she were to come to my home for the evening with her husband.
As a decent human being I could not allow to see a decent, innocent, law-abiding family have their children taken away and that was the reason I decided to (try) and help them. The reason for this was because in 1994, I had my daughter taken into the care of HERTFORDSHIRE SOCIAL SERVICES, whereby they committed FRAUD, NON-FEASANCE, MALFEASANCE, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE, MISREPRESENTATION, PERJURY… all of which I intend to put before the Court of Human Rights. I did not want to see this family suffer as I had and have for many years. All I had asked for was help for my child who I suspected had been sexually abused by her father, who, incidentally is ALSO one of the people who ABUSED ME when I was younger and whom the POLICE now (2011) REFUSE to take up my case for ‘historic abuse’ – telling me it is ‘out-of-date’, which is a LIE!
I knew when I became involved with the family more that MY OWN family were being put at risk, as there are many families within Harringey who have either had their children taken into care (I know of only one who has had the child returned), or been threatened to have a child/ren taken into care, been moved away from the family out of the area and/or ‘disappeared’. I have had to move away from the UK to protect my own child. I have (attempted) to submit an Urgent Judicial Review application against JUDGE GLENN BRASSE’s decision 1) not to investigate allegations of sexual abuse of one of the children from this family and b) Ignoring Three EPO’s I have applied for and one which I applied for in St Albans (Hertfordshire, UK) Courts. I have experiences, first hand, the arrogance of Joyce Agyekum, who obviously believes she is above the law (she committed purjery in Court,e FEBRUARY 2011 – which can be proven).


I would like to add my comments also. JUDGE GLENN BRASSE acknowledged in February that ALL the ‘original’ allegations against the family WERE FALSE and is set on record (at least it should be on record at the Court House) that “Social Services in Harringey can make whatever claims they want to, regardless of whether or not they are found to be true or false”. He has also IGNORED a number of EPO’s (Emergency Protection Orders, in accordance with the Children Act 1989) which I have submitted, and at one time physically handed to an Usher at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch Court, London.
I am now attempting to submit an URGENT JUDICIAL REVIEW, but am having difficulties and NO ONE seems to know where I should be submitting the form and if they do, I do NOT have an e-mail address where to send it. If you can help, please provide me with the e-mail where I send it. I have also made it clear and will state here, I DO suspect in submitting the Judicial Review application, that my life, AND anyone close to me (friend AND/OR family) MAY be at serious risk of harm by ANY AUTHORITIES / Organisations / Public Body/ies. I have already had an allegation made by the UK Social Services to the Irish Social Services Department for concern about my mental health. There is much more to what has and IS happening to me at the moment for helping this family – in short: I have lost everything. The ‘apparent’ Social Worker who came to see me called herself ‘Runya Mupfambati’ – I found out later she was NOT AUTHORISED to work with Hertfordshire County Coucil Social Services Department because she was registered as working in LONDON – I suspect a direct link to Harringey somewhere. Joyce Agyekum is REGISTERED as working in HERTFORDSHIRE, but it seems – is still involved with the family in question. Runya – is actually Runyararo Editor Mupfambati (as I have been informed by the GSCC – General Social Care Council)
I have been informed by the GSCC the following:
1. ALL Social Workers have to be registered with the GSCC to call themself a ‘Social Worker’.
2. The name on their badge/s has TO BE THE SAME as the name they are registered under.
3. They have to register under the AREA / Authority, they work for – if they don’t they have no authority working in that particular area/ Location / Town / Borough etc.,
Surely, Judge Brasse would have known this? As he was not allowing Mr Musa and Bishop Gloria at one time to be given legal advice (unless it was by Solicitors he suggested) on the grounds that ‘they would not be registered and answerable if not registered’.
Gloria Musa (the mother of the Children) has been featured many times in The Telegraph by Christopher Booker. When I first got involved with this family / befriended them, I was sent alot of ‘anonymous’ e-mails; that is I did not know how whoever sent them to me, got my e-mail address (land e-mail address). She is not a Prostitute – someone who originally reported it to SOCIAL SERVICES (and works for a CHARITY CALLED CARIS, in Harringey) has stated in the Court proceedings in February that it was “only a joke”, or something very similar to those words. Former Eastenders Actress – Michelle Collins – has also played a major part in the case because she has also given false representation / evidence and in February also stated she did not mean it to be ‘nasty’, as it was all meant as a ‘joke’. This family are NOT UK Nationals.
I was due to submit a Statement before the Court on Friday, 25th February 2011 and give evidence on the Monday 28th February. Unfortunately, the person was an advocate for the family had been ‘discharged from Court’ and I knew – at some stage I would be put directly in the firing line for assisting this family. What I mean by ‘firing line’ is this: earlier in February, I had given my FULL NAME (I had told them my name was either ‘Kay’ or ‘Ms Young’ before. I had also complained about the local Police Force (as mentioned herein) with regard to them taking up an Historic abuse case. I also had ‘problems with being bullied at my sons school, and had complained; on 18th February I realised Social Services may come back to my home at some stage should the School contact them – which the school did. Judge Glenn Brasse suggested to the Mother that she submit a complaint. Myself and Bishop Gloria Musa went along to HARRINGEY SOCIAL SERVICES to do so and were obstructed to submit a complaint by the staff there on duty. The duty staff were Ms JUNE McKENZIE (Manager of Children and Families) and Ms TRACEY DAVIES, (Social Worker – Children and Families) for Harringey Social Services – Ms McKenzie took Ms Davies OUT of the room at one point to (in Ms McKenzies words ‘diffuse the situation’ – as at one point, Ms Davies looked like she was going ‘to go’ for me – in other words, looked like she may get up and physically assault me). THIS conversation CAN BE PROVED…. As I understood, Judge Brasse had requested the children we re-united with the family (21 February), but by the end of the week he had changed his mind for some apparent reason (not known to me). He even asked Joyce Agyekum a time scale the children could be re-united with their family – she requested (I believe) 2012, to which he had stated it was ‘not good enough’ and he requested a shorter time-scale.
A large number of Social Workers / POLICE (to name but a few Annie Walker – Mngr Ch and F, Maria Foster – Mngr, Ch and F, Joyce Agyekum – Social Worker (SW), Alexandra Constantinou (SW), Rositta Moise, Solicitor (London Borough of Haringey’s Solicitor – who incidentally was NOT on the Law Society’s register). POLICE within Harringey who have been /ARE involved with the family: Sargeant KADIRI, PC Christie, PC Caswell, DC Nagra and DS Cara Barton – I have no doubt there would be more. I spoke to someone called MOJI Word twice on her mobile phone in December 2010 – she was ‘running for Presidency’. She thanked me for helping the family as she IS A personal friend. She also stated that the Police within Harringey dropped the case against Mr Musa and Bishop Gloria after she had spoken to them (she spoke to the Police in Harringey).
I have also submitted a complaint to the ‘Office for Judicial Complaints’ who – at one time, informed me the Judge in question had RETIRED! I found his name on the list of ‘Circuit Judges’ and corrected them…. Given Mr Hales works in such an office, he should be aware of who is and is not still a Judge!!
The LITTLE GIRL, aged 10 years old, is BEING SEXUALLY ABUSED in care and NO ONE seems to want to do anything to help her (that is if she is still alive as she has not been seen for a number of MONTHS and NO ONE is granted either telephone contact with her or any other form of contact. After the (referred to as ‘F’ for now) 10 year old, had told her mothre at a CONTACT SESSION that she had been abused by the FOSTER PARENTS SON, I submitted the first EPO. I have attempted to submit another EPO yesterday, Wednesday, but because of where I am at the moment, I have limited time to search for the relevant e-mail address. I am having to rely on a library PC at the moment and the ‘good will’ of the staff here, which I have to say, has been excellent – after I explained to them what I have been doing and about the injustice of the case. I STILL HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS FOR THE WELL-BEING of the 10 year old little girl
If ANYONE would like any further information, please feel free to contact me at this e-mail address; I am unable to give a land e-mail address as since I have been in IRELAND, my benefits from the UK have been and ARE seriously being interferred with by ‘authorities’ and I am therefore, not getting any money at the moment. I have been living off CHURCH FOOD VOUCHERS given by the Church here and have had one ‘back-dated’ payment which has paid the rent and enabled me to buy my young child a new, decent pair of shoes. Given the nature of this case and as I am living in Ireland, I am also copying Ming Flanagan, who is the current Mayor of County Roscommon.
The Judiciary in the UK is corrupt and I will be submitting my own (past) case with evidence to the European Courts of Human Rights – rather than use the procedures for the UK Judicial system. PLEASE HELP EXPOSE the corruption within the UK Judiciary that this family have had to experience.
I trust this clarifies some of the details about the family. I AM NOT AND HAVE NEVER had any ‘Orders’ against me NOT to speak about the case AND INFORMATION shared within this e-mail has been divulged to me by various sources.
Yours sincerely
B.A & B.Sc (Hons) OPEN
I am also copying, for information only, to Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP, who was my Local MP when I lived in the UK, as I have kept him informed regarding the case, since October 2010.
Copy also sent to Mr Paul Randle-Jolliffe who was the Advocate representing the family in February and who was extradited from Court – as referred to above.
CC: includes Rt. Hon. Grant Shapps MP – For information only
Sam Hallimond – for Information only
Ming Flanagan – current Mayor of County Roscommon,, Ireland
PLEASE NOTE: ALL CLAIMS MADE WITHIN THIS E-MAIL CAN BE PROVEN… There is tape-recorded evidence to substantiate ALL allegations made. If there is any part of this you – anyone – would like clarification of, please do not hesitate to contact me



——————————————————————————————–
6, 7,  9  sept letters to prin reg holborn
To whom it may concern,

 Having called the Principle Registry this afternoon Friday 9 Sept. 2011 on phone numbers 020 79477939 at 16.31 BST,  my call was hung up without notice, followed by a further call to number 02079476020 at the same address at 16.39 when i was hung up upon again, I finally rang 02079 477922 at again the same addressed to be told that there was no one there to take my call.
During the first call a young lady there told me that London councils can renew Interim Care Orders by phone, which was going to be the subject of my phone call had I been able to speak with anyone. I duly pointed out I had put in my emails the law which states otherwise – that ICO’s were not allowed to be issued if the parents had objected and were not present at the court hearing – as was the case when the MUSA parents were not present in the court when this ICO was issued on the 5 Sept. 2011, and the said ICO was therefore null and void that was supposedly “issued” by judge Hess, the notification received by the MUSA family by judge BERRY IN THE LATE AFTERNOON, AS MY RESUME DESCRIBES BELOW IN THE EMAILS UNANSWERED BY YOURSELVES.

I am concerned at the lady on the phone saying that ICOs are issued FOR LONDON COUNCILS IF THE PARENTS CONCERNED ARENT PRESENT, and although she claimed to be an “admin clerk”, this indeed is a serious statement of how this court works. I have solid evidence to prove this was said and what ive described occurred in its entirety.

Thank you,

J. Graham
——————————————————————————–
From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
To: mark.barford@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uklorraine.morichelli@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.ukdave.woods@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.ukadmin@number10.gov.ukpickles@communities.gsi.gov.ukpicklese@parliament.uksupportline@victimsupport.org.ukmayt@parliament.uklammyd@parliament.ukruffleyd@parliament.ukprfd.privatelaw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uklee.grubb@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.ukcamerond@parliament.ukandrew@andrewgeorge.org.uk
Subject: FW: CASE NO FD10C00195 – THE MUSA FAMILY ANDTHE ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF THEIR 5 CHILDREN
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:27:31 +0100

Dear Sir / Madam,
Further to my email dated 6 9 11 below can you please tell me exactly what action you intend to take about:
a} the illegalities involved – the ICO being issued contrary to the standard guidelines set within British law,
b} the children now removed under a null and void order – are they to be returned as no legal ICO is in place as is their right?
and
c} what is to be done about the persons who partook in the actions of issuing a meaningless and irregular Interim Care Order, in respect of those persons not acting responsibly and allowing such an ICO to be issued?
I may add this is the 4th time such an ICO has been issued, without the objecting parents being at the hearing which is their right according to British law.
This case – no. FD10C00195 –  is not only causing a lot of unnecessary distress to the parents and more than likely their children since the irregularities began on the 8 April 2010, brought about by government employees who seem set on working outside the law, but is also wasting a huge amount of taxpayers money in the process. No wonder there are silencing orders in place whereby the misdeeds and crimes that have been committed are kept from public scrutiny.
 It is an outright disgrace that things are allowed to continue by those put in office that are supposed to monitor and stop and correct such irregularities and crimes.

Thank you.

J. Graham.


From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
Sent: 06 September 2011 11:22:03
To:  mark.barford@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uklorraine.morichelli@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.ukdave.woods@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.ukadmin@number10.gov.ukpickles@communities.gsi.gov.ukpicklese@parliament.uksupportline@victimsupport.org.ukmayt@parliament.uklammyd@parliament.ukruffleyd@parliament.ukprfd.privatelaw@hmcts.gsi.gov.uklee.grubb@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.ukcamerond@parliament.uk

MUSA FAMILY ANDTHE ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF THEIR 5 CHILDREN
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:22:03 +0100

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN,

CASE NO FD10C00195 – THE MUSA FAMILY AND THEIR 5 CHILDREN.

Concerning an Interim Care Order issued yesterday 5 September 2011 regarding the 5 children belonging to the MUSA parents GLORIA  and CHIWAR MUSA at the 
Principle Registry of the Family Division, Holborn, London
this is an official complaint regarding the proceedings involving judge HESS, judge BERRY and all others concerned whereby an Interim Care Order was issued outside of British law at the above court.
It is understood JUDGE BERRY informed the MUSA parents GLORIA and CHIWAR MUSA of an ICO being issued via a telephone conversation between HARINGEY COUNCIL and a certain JUDGE HESS. Seeing as the MUSA parents objects to this ICO being issued, and had notified the correct people of their objections, for this ICO to be issued in their absence renders the said ICO null and void.

MAY I POINT OUT BRITISH LAW, IN THAT IT IS ILLEGAL TO ISSUE AN ICO IF THE PARENTS HAVE OBJECTED AND ARE NOT IN THE COURT FOR THE ISSUANCE HEARING.  THE PARENTS HAD OBJECTED AND THESE CHARACTERS HARINGEY COUNCIL, JUDGE HESS, AND JUDGE BERRY HAVE PERVERTED THE COURSE OF TRUE JUSTICE BY ISSUING THE ORDER AND MUST BE HELD RESPONSIBLE. THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME AN ICO HAS BEEN ISSUED ILLEGALLY REGARDING THE MUSA CHILDREN, THE PARENTS NOT BEING PRESENT, HAVING OFFICIALLY RAISED OBJECTIONS AND FOLLOWING THE CORRECT PROCEDURE FOR SUCH OBJECTIONS.
 THE PARENTS HAD BEEN AT THER COURT READY FOR THE HEARING  WITH RELAVENT DOCUMENTS AT THE OPENING OF THE PREMISES IN THE MORNING ONLY TO BE TOLD JUST BEFORE IT CLOSED OF THIS ICO BEING ISSUED CONTRARY TO BRITISH LAW. IT IS DISGRACEFUL THAT THESE JUDGES, SUPPOSEDLY KNOWING THE LAW GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE OF THE SAID INTERIM CARE ORDERS COULD ACT IN THIS WAY, THE LAWS GOVERNING THE ISSUANCE BEING:

Rule 28 of the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 SI
1991/1395 which provides;

“A justice’s clerk or single justice shall not make an
order under section 11(3) or section 38(1) unless –
(a) A written request for such an order has been made to
which the other parties and children’s guardian consent
and which they or their representatives have signed;
(b) A previous such order has been made in the same
proceedings; and
(c) The terms of the order sought are the same as those of the last such
order made.”

The parents have consistently stated in writing that they do not agree to the
orders being renewed which means postal renewal cannot lawfully happen,
there must be a hearing whether the parents attend or not

This     is stated clearly in Neutral Citation no. (2002)     NIFam 11 Ref:    GILC3695 IN     THE MATTER OF SM (INTERIM CARE ORDERS: EXERCISE OF JUDGE’S DISCRETION)

Frankly I am not absolutely certain what the phrase `willbe renewed administratively by Court Office until date of review hearing’means.  It was clear that counsel in this case were also somewhat unclear.  It may be helpful if I set out at this stage some comments on the renewal of Interim Care Orders;

1.         When an Interim Care Order is made it is normally necessary for the making of further Interim Care Orders to be considered on at least one occasion before the finalhearing.  I am given to believe that there may be a variety of local practices for dealing with such cases and while it is not intended to encourage courts to depart unnecessarily from well-established local arrangements(particularly those which approximate closely to what I recommend below), some guidance may be helpful to ensure a degree of uniformity.  Although the makingof further Interim Care Orders is described as “renewal”, it must be rememberedthat the proper form of order is that the whole application is adjourned to the next date for further consideration.

2.         A courtmay not renew an Interim Care Order as a matter of course and without reconsideration.  At the expiration of every Interim Care Order, the granting of every further Interim Care Order must be considered independentlyon its merits.  It can never be right for a court granting an Interim Care Order at one sitting to attempt to lay down a policy which might fetter the discretion of any future sitting in regard to the grant or refusal of a further Interim Care Order – see Re P(Minors) (Interim Order) [1993]2 FLR 742.

3.         It is,therefore, necessary for the court to make a judgment regarding renewal in eachoccasion and the court should treat each further hearing as an opportunity to monitor the progress of the application.  This does not mean however that all parties should be required to attend a hearing on each occasion.  The court is perfectly entitled to deal with the matter on the basis of the attendance of the applicant only provided that written consents of the other parties are produced and no party objects.  Provision can therefore be made at the first direction hearing for further Interim Care Orders to made without the need for the personal attendance of all the parties.
4.        In the Family Care Centres where the Trust, who normally would be the applicant, produces consents from all the parties, confirms that directions have been complied with and the court considers that it might be unduly onerous to require the personal attendance of his representative eg due to the distance to be travelled or for some other good reason, then I can see no reason inprinciple why the court should not permit the applicant Trust in those circumstances to make a written application for renewal.  In such an instance, the responsibility would rest with the applicant to ensure that a written application was acceptable to the court, that all the consents were in order, and that all parties concerned were satisfied that the papers would reach the court file in time for the hearing.  That application must however be considered by the appropriate judicial officer.  Such aprocedure would be similar to the well-established practice of hearings on the papers presently carried on for example in the Court of Protection and beforemasters in the High Court.



I HEREBY ASK THAT THIS MATTER RECEIVES THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES BY THE POLICE AND OTHER REGULATORY BODIES WHO WILL BE INFORMED IMMEDIATLY OF THIS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE, AND THE PERSONS ACTING OUTSIDE THE LAW BE BROUGHT TO BOOK, AND THE CHILDREN THIS FALSE ICO ISSUED WAS REGARDING BE RETURNED AT ONCETO THEIR RIGHTFUL PARENTS, THE CHILDREN BEING REMOVED FROM THOSE PARENTS BY ILLEGAL MEANS ANYWAY, viz. FALSE EVIDENCE AND ALLEGATIONS BY EMPLOYEES OF HARINGEY COUNCIL.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THESE VISITORS TO THIS COUNTRY – THE MANY CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST THEM BY HARINGEY COUNCIL AND PERSONS CONNECTED TO THEM IN THE REMOVAL OF THEIR 6 CHILDREN,  SUCH AS THE ACTIONS OF THE GUARDIAN SOLICITOR ABOUT WHOM I HAVE ISSUED OFFICIAL COMPLAINTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY IGNORED  IS AN OUTRIGHT DISGRACE.

THANK YOU

J.GRAHAM

===============
2}  From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
Sent: 26 June 2011 08:58:04
To:  lammyd@parliament.uk
Cc:  admin@number10.gov.uk

Dear Mr. Lammy,
I understand you are the MP for the area in London in which the Nigerian Musa family are resident. Id like a meeting to see you immediatly, and I mean immediatly, about some very serious matters. I have written to you several times and have not received any reply, and quite frankly im appalled, not at your ignoring my communications, but the fact of what was in those communications, which told you of the many irregularities concerning the case of the Musa family having 5 children removed under very dubious circumstances. This pales into comparison with the fact that one of the children – the 9 year old girl Favour Musa – has not been seen for approx. 10 months since she reported being sexually molested – “inappropriatly touched” – whilst in the care provided by the local council. This is a very serious matter considering the girl has not been seen for 10 months by her parents, and neither have her brother or any of her sisters seen her either – and nobody is even told of her wellbeing or anything about her whatsoever – as I told you weeks ago by my ignored recorded delivery letter – which not only goes against the Childrens Charter the government is pushing, but also is against her and her parents Human Rights and also is against the orders the court made, and against the statutes for removed children in Britain also. What is happening is highly illegal but no authorities will face up to the situation. Why is this Mr. Lammy?
Unbelievably this appalling situation has now got worse in that the contact visits have stopped completely for these parents and their children – the parents not having seen any of their children for 4 weeks or more now – this disgraceful situation is totally illegal again and against the court orders etc. as Ive already said. Im sure youll agree all that is happening here comes within the remit your responsibility as the local MP, but it seems you are doing nothing and refuse to do anything even though i have sent you communications by email and by recorded delivery outlining clearly and concisely the numerous illegalities happening weeks ago. Can you please tell me why?
If you are wondering who i might be I will tell you I am a very concerned citizen and a friend of the family, have known them for some time, have stayed with them on numerous occasions and know very much the truths of this case. I have met many of this family’s friends who have been much affected by this case, {also having their relationships with their children interfered with by the same people},and I know other witnesses who I am in contact with constantly who have also been very much affected by things. I have been in contact with the police and the Chief Constable about this case,and many others. Reporters like Christopher Booker dont write articles for over a year on a case unless theres something very much to it {pls. see below}.  

So as I said I would like a meeting with you as soon as possible to find out just why you are failing to do what you are paid to do – to represent these people when something such as they are suffering is happening. I can come to any venue you like to meet you, Parliament or anywhere, but I cannot stress the urgency of a meeting. I have sent you many emails and communications by recorded delivery as I have the MP Theresa May – kindly do not ignore this one.
Thank you.  This message is a true sworn statement.
J Graham.

————————————————————————————————————————
 “Sunday Telegraph” reporter Christopher Bookers articles about the Musa family torture at the hands of Haringey council:
STILL NOTHING HAS BEEN HEARD ABOUT THIS MISSING GIRL AS OF 26 6 2011:
SUNDAY 12 6 11:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8570173/The-mystery-of-Haringeys-missing-Girl-X-makes-a-mockery-of-the-Children-Act.html
The mystery of Haringey’s missing ‘Girl X’ makes a mockery of the Children Act
The family of a girl taken into care have not seen or heard from her for 10 months, writes Christopher Booker.
                       ======================================

3}
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 05:51:19 +0100
Subject: Fwd: FW: URGENT! FAO LOUISE CASEY – THE MUSA FAMILY
From: butlincat75@googlemail.com
To: mayt@parliament.ukruffleyd@parliament.ukinfo@telldavidruffley.comtimyeomp@parliament.ukLynne@lynnefeatherstone.orgshappsg@parliament.ukcamerond@parliament.uk
CC: ben.rankin@mirror.co.ukcommunity@mirror.co.ukcservices@mgn.co.ukeditor@guardian.co.ukeditor@dailymail.co.ukeditor@express.co.ukeditor@gazettegroup.comeditor@independent.co.ukeditor@mailonsunday.co.ukeditor@observer.co.ukeditor@telegraph.co.ukeditor@thetimes.co.ukexpressletters@express.co.ukfeedback@mirror.co.ukhelen.foster.@bbc.co.ukinvestigate@mirror.co.ukletters@dailymail.co.ukletters@guardian.co.ukletters@independent.co.ukletters@mailonsunday.co.ukletters@observer.co.ukletters@thetimes.co.ukliz.james@express.co.ukmailbox@mirror.co.ukmirrornews@mirror.co.uknews@gazettegroup.comnews@theplymouthherald.co.ukpete.saull@bbc.co.uk;

Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:52:10 +0100
Subject: URGENT! FAO LOUISE CASEY – THE MUSA FAMILY
From: butlincat@gmail.com
To: general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Ms. Casey,
Having seen you on the tv the other day in your role as Victim’s Commissioner my gut instinct told me that you seemed a very caring conscientious person and I knew at once I had to write to you to make you aware of something and ask for your assistance in a very serious matter. There has been no response AT ALL when trying to tell people in so-called “authority”of a certain case with its numerouis outrageous irregularities and crimes involving the removal of 5 children from their parents by certain parties within Haringey council, N. London.
So it is with a heavy heart I have to tell you that many crimes have taken place by many people involved in the removal of these 5 children, and since the children were removed over a year ago things have got progressively worse until now things have become absolutely scandalous. Things have got so bad that the council can never ever afford to let the true facts and their involvement and actions over the past year become generally known, especially after the tragic and very sad cases of “Baby P” and Victoria Climbe where this council did indeed play a large part which led to these  childrens lives being taken.
There really is so much to relate but I will concentrate on certain articles that explain things as best as I can. What follows below is a} my message to the Chief Constable Mr. Martin Baker after my appeals for something being done were totally ignored by my local police. Suffice to say I have sent many emails {which I can show you at any time if required} to parties such as the Prime Minister, MPs, Lord Triesman,numerous child care agencies and other government bodies, public figures and other child support agencies trying to explain the situation. I have not received any replies, even from my letters by recorded delivery to Ms. Theresa May MP, the local MP to the Musas Mr. David Lammy and others.{ I have the postal receipts of these letters sent as proof}.
Attatched are the articles of Mr. Christopher Booker, reporter, who has written approximately 11 artcles in the “Sunday Telegraph” over the last year. Restrictions now forbid him to report properly and openly on the case any more.
A Judicial Review has been issued regarding the judge, which kept on being rejected time and time again, but whethewr anything becomes of that remains to be seen, and an E.P.O. has been sent which was also rejected many times, which is another matter.
There are many more important details I cannot impart here, but suffice to say charges are in the pipeline to be issued over actions that have happened. I do ask sincerely for your help in this very serious matter Ms. Casey, because what is happening to these parents and especially the 5 children is a disgrace. Thank you for your time in reading my long diatribe and I hope so much you and your organisation can help these people as noone should ever have to go through what this family has.

 Favour Musa also complained that she didnt like living in the home environment that she had been forced to accept that had been imposed upon her. She disliked the constant smoky atmosphere from presumably cigarettes but I raise the concern that massive numbers of 19 year olds in the UK smoke cannabis – marijuana – constantly, and I put it to anyone that this could easily be the situation here. Favour said that she would go upstairs at the property  when the teenager had been smoking whatever and drinking cans of alcohol when he would play his guitar. It was on such an occasion it is understood the event of her being “inappropriatly touched” took place.
 Can you imagine the scenario? It is disgusting. A child of African culture is forced to live with a beer-swilling teenager in a cigarette or cannabis smoke ridden atmosphere and after a few cans of alcohol apparently tries his luck with sexual advances on the 9 YEAR OLD child? I find this outrageous and just as outrageous is the police and Chief Constable and numerous other figures ignoring not only the “touching” episode{s} but also the illegalities of the contact visits not taking place – it is against the orders the court made and it against both parties human rights and it is against the Childrens Act.  Why wasnt anybody listened to by the council or police or indeed anywhere when these facts were put before them? When I tried to explain to the judge “Sir Mark Potter” about Favour’s situation at Mr. Musa’s appeal request hearing I was told to shut up and sit down on numerous occasions at the Royal Courts of Justice on Monday 16 May and he said I was interfering!!! This is ourrageous when a 9 year old girl is having to go through what Ive described and denied from seeing any of her family – none of her sisters or brother or parents have seen her at all, and each time the Musa parents ask of her welfare they are told nothing!
 Favour has been forced also to have a different Christian name by these council workers or somebody or other, that being “Lizzy”. Who gave themj the right to change her name? Was she asked? Did the parents have a say? Id bet everything I own she wasnt asked, and it seems to me to be part of  subtle brainwashing tactics that can be used on a vulnerable innocent child – to change her name, and force her into a British culture of alcohol and cigarettes {or marijuana or crack being smoked?} along with the food that is totally alien to her. Is she being taken to church on a Sunday as she was used to doing when she was at home? I doubt it very much.{Her mother is a bishop in the African Evangelical church}.
These characters whove done this and forced a child into a situation where shes molested should be prosecuted for aiding and abetting a crime and doing nothing about it when its reported to them!! This is why its so important that you please listen to whats happening Ms. Casey. Also there is evidence and proof of all I say, and also of her being bitten by the family dog!! Was the dog removed from the premises so it couldnt do it again? So much is kept quiet and it is feared, as I tried to tell the police and the CC, that she is indeed dead or has been taken abroad.
Now the contact visits have ceased totally with all the children and the Musas havent seen their children for over 4 weeks – again against the orders of the court and against the so-called “Childrens Act” which is supposed to promote contact in situations like this, but the opposite is taking place.
Thank you for your time Ms. Casey. Please help this family and do what is right.
.Sincerely,
 J. Graham. This is a true sworn statement.

The email that I received sent to Mr. Musa was so serious I went to the police. The email is here:

“HELP ! FAVOUR MUSA AGE 10 IS BEING ABUSED BY A GANG OF PAEDOPHILES !

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS 21 MEMSTEAD ROAD ,ERITH, KENT , DA8 3LA

Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Harringey Council to see or phone her;

Haringey Council have refused her aunts, uncles and,grandparents (9 family members in all) any contact with Favour even though they all came especially from Africa to see her !
She has 5 sisters and a brother ,and none of them have seen her for weeks !

Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION !

Favour needs YOUR HELP !! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER BECAUSE SHE DARED TO REPORT BEING ABUSED WHILE “IN CARE” !!

HARRINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P,and Victoria Climbé
They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds !

We do not know if she is alive or dead !! PLEASE,PLEASE, find and contact Favour , she is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS !! ” **********************************************************************************

Please take heed of what is being done here Ms. Casey.

The attatchments to this email are:
a} my letter to a foster care authority, with their reply – the only department to actually reply to any communication from me.
b} a witness statement from witness Ms. Moji Word,
e} communication from law advocate and former legal representative for the Musa’s Mr. Randle-Jolliffe about certain matters.
f} Mr. C. Bookers “Sunday Telegraph” articles – full year.
c} my letter to Lord Triesman, 14 5 11, no reply received.
d} My F.O.I. request to Haringey council, subsequently refused.
 g} A witness statement from Kay Young who was targetted by the Haringey council as at least 5 other witnesses of the Musas have been, the result being Ms. Young fled the country thus keeping the child the council hade threatened to take, for no reason other than Ms. Young was a Musa witnress and knew everything that had happened to the family. She left behind a totally normal life, a home with all her belongings because of the harassment from the council who served a Section 47 on her, threatening to take her child for no reason whatsoever.
Directly below is Ms. Musa’s affadavit,
followed by my communications to the Chief Constable Mr. Baker after Dorset police refused to take my reporting seriously about a 9 year old girl being missing for 10 months after she had reported to her father on a contact visit that shed been “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested – by a 19 year old male in the foster family home. We have photos of this character and his mother.
——————————————————–
This is a letter from Mrs. Gloria Musa to a well known MP. Mrs. Musa got no reply or help in any way, as I didnt after sending many emails and letters via recorded delivery to her at Parliament, as Mr. Lammy was sent too. .

————————————————-

“Subject: APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE WE HAVE NOT SEEN OUR DAUGHTER FOR 9 MONTHS
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 10:56:40 +0000

> > From: Gloria > > Subject: APPEAL FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE
> > To: mayt@parliament.uk
> > Date: Thursday, December 23, 2010, 6:54 AM


Rt Hon Theresa May MP
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Tel: 020 7219 5206
Fax: 020 7219 1145
mayt@parliament.uk

Dear Rt. Honourable May,

APPEAL  FOR URGENT ASSISTANCE

My Name is Mrs Gloria Musa. I am an author and Minister of Religion. I am married to Mr  Musa. We have six children.
My husband and I arrived in the UK  with visitors visas with two of our children and had the other four in the UK.  We did not need to make any application as we do not wish to remain here.
On 8 April 2010 Haringey children’s services claimed that a neighbour had found a letter in the front garden of our temporary address which they alleged that my eldest daughter had written and sent in the police who in turn took away our children on the basis that my husband and I are child traffickers, I am a sex worker who was having sex with strangers in front of my children, I suffer from epilepsy and had brain surgery, I was physically and sexually abused by my step father as a child and given  opium by him, my husband and I have a history of fleeing from professionals whenever we came to their attention due to issues relating to the care of our children and are therefore likely to flee with our children, we neglected our children etc.
The court granted an interim care order on the basis of these allegations and ordered a DNA on our children with a warning that my husband faced a long prison sentence if the allegations are correct.  At this time I was pregnant for our sixth child.
On   June 2010 our sixth child was born. Following the sudden birth which occurred because I was distressed as a result of not being allowed to see my children in care on that date,  we notified the Local authority in line with their request.
Following the notification the Local authority sent about nine police men to the hospital who forcefully took away our daughter a few hours after she was born and I was badly manhandled and humiliated by the police. The Local authority then applied for the baby to be placed in care. I was not given any support but they tried to get me to retrospectively sign a document stating that i had authorised them to take the baby which i refused. My life has not been the same since then.
The DNA report came out after a long delay in October and proved that my husband and I are the parents of our children. Police evidence shows that i am not known to the police in any capacity and therefore not a prostitute. I was not born in the UK and never had a step father. My parents are still happily married and had never lived in the UK.
I had thought that the case would have ended and my children returned to me after the DNA result. I was wrong because the Local authority has rather intensified efforts to give up my children for adoption and long term care. They have instead changed their allegations relying on psychiatric reports prepared by a well known lying psychiatrist who is connected to them and an independent social services report. Although the lies are very obvious the judge has ignored all our please and has indicated that he has decided what to do though the hearing is listed for February 2010.
 Honourable please do not ignore our plea   we have decided that we want to leave the UK with all our childre without any further delay. The Local Authority thinks that they can keep our children and we can go.
We will not go without our children and would like you to please intervene. We are visitors here as foriegn nationals we need your help as our life is in danger here we need to return back with our children back to our famillies at home alive.we have writen to you twice last year and early this year please we plead for your urgent resp
This is a very abridged version of our experience and we are happy to meet with you in order to get the permission to leave with our children as soon as possible. Our children are not British and we are not prepared to leave them behind. They have suffered greatly in care. We have not seen our eldest daughter for  who the Local authority is brainwashing our coercing since the past NIne months. In addition to falsely accusing her of writing the letter which they claim was found in our front garden they are making her write letters claiming that she wants to stay in care until she is 18. They stopped her from seeing us after she asked for a journal. They perhaps believed that she would tell us more about her experiences in the journal.
Before they stopped her from seeing us in contact, she had informed us that she was bitten by the carer’s dog and the carer’s 19 year old son was luring her into his upstairs room to touch her inappropriately and teach her how to smoke cigarettes. Although we brought this to the attention of the Local authority, they have failed to do anything but have rather continued to brain wash and coerce her. We worry for her future because if the same Local Authority which is supposed to be protecting her from abuse is happy to convince and compel her to agree that she wrote a letter which she did not write, then we are not sure what the future holds for children in England. They will probably grow up to believe that it is alright to lie.
Please help us. We just want to leave here alive with our children as we gave birth to them is our duty and responsility to give them the best.
We look forward to hearing from you.

Yours sincerely
Mrs Gloria Musa”
———————————————————————————-
My message to a Chief Constable:
“FAO CHIEF CONSTABLE BAKER?

12/05/2011

To lcjb@dorset.pnn.police.uk
From: butlincat (butlincat75@googlemail.com
Sent: 12 May 2011 03:04:10
To:  lcjb@dorset.pnn.police.uk
Dear Mr. Baker,
I am writing to you as Chief Constable as I have knowledge of serious crimes it is my duty as a British citizen to report them. I am having to report these crimes to you as my previous attampt at informing a certain department at Dorset police failed miserably, as the emails below show. I am told by characters in this department to inform the sender of the email I received which details some of the crimes I wish to tell you about that he must inform people I already said were working outside the law. This obviously has been ignored by the people at Dorset police I contacted and I am asking you to put matters right by seeing the law is enforced regarding the child Favour being sexually molested whilst in care.
The basic facts are a 9 year old girl was removed by police along with others on the orders of Haringey council over a year ago. This girl – Favour Musa – then complained to her parents on a contact visit later that she had been molested by a character at the placement home. I have the details of the person concerned, including a photograph, and what supposedly happened after the event of molestation.
Yesterday the 11 5 2011 I received the email below from Chiwar Musa, stating about a paedophile ring and the child Favour Musa. I then called Bournemouth police on 01202 220055 to report crimes and I asked for the child protection department, spoke to someone eventually though I know not from which department who gave me an email address to which i should sent the email i received. I duly did this and the correspondance between myself and the police is below in its entirety.
I know from personal experience that when reporting a crime one does not have to go to the police force that is in the area where the crime one wished to report is, yet I am told this in these emails. I have reported crimes before on different occasions to a totally seperate police force area-wise to the crime{s} located area and it has received due process by the police, so I was amazed when I reported the serious crimes of a sexual nature on a minor I was fed this. This is unacceptable and I hereby report the crimes of sexual molestation to you as I have noone else to report it to. I cannot report it to Haringey police as I am told as I know of numerous instances where they have acted illegally whilst dealing with the Musa case of illegal child removal, and witness intimidation features highly on that list incidentally. This statement is truthful and I can relate many instances of that which I speak, including the serious witness intimidation connected to the Musa case of child removal who have been acted upon and intimidated by Haringey council.
An application for an E.P.O. is attatched below concerning the child concerned {names redacted} to try to show this is no fairy story. I know the Musas well, they are friends and I know them to be honest and truthful. I hereby ask you to enforce the law as others I have contacted refused to investigate what I have told them regarding sexual crimes against a minor. This is not the 1st time I have reported serious crimes to Bournemouth police which have been totally ignored and something should be done about this.
Thank you.
J. Graham.
——————————————
Another notice of the issuing of another E.P.O. concerning Favour Musa:

Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 17:02:09 +0100

LETTER BEFORE CLAIM

TO
Judge
FROM:
CC: {some names redacted}
Mr Musa – under separate cover
Bishop Gloria Musa – under separate cover
Royal Courts of Justice – under separate cover
Office for Judicial Complaints
Myself
REFERENCE DETAILS
I understand, all EPO’s (Emergency Protection Orders) I submitted were not acted upon. I also understand it has been claimed that only the NSPCC and Social Services can apply for an EPO.
Details of matter
Please be advised it is my intention to apply for an urgent Judicial Review with regard to who has authority to apply for an EPO (in accordance with the Children Act 1989), as I have for Favour Musa, Tabitha Musa and Abraham Musa. I understand my applications were not acted upon receipt of same (3 in total). I hand-delivered one, which was stamped as received by the Court Usher ast Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court; therefore, claiming acceptance of the application. I will, therefore, be requesting a Judicial Review on this matter for future cases.
I am sending Rt Hon Grant Shapps a copy of this e-mail, as I have kept him informed of this ongoing case since October 2010. Copy sent to John Hemming MP, as I mentioned to him at the Working Party on Family Law about the EPO applications.
I would also like to make clear, I understand by making the application for Judicial Review, anyone in my family could be ‘at risk’ from intimidation / and threats. I shall be submitting an EX160B Form, which should be in receipt by approximately 10 working days.
I look forward to receiving your reply within the stipulated 14 day period.
Yours sincerely

CC: As above
FORMS: C1 and C11 will be sent in a separate e-mail

——————————————————————————–

From Dorset police to me:

Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 14:46:35 +0100
From: Enquiries@Dorset.PNN.Police.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Hi John
We receive a number of unsubstantiated emails on the internet, however if there is evidence to support the allegations they should be forwarded to the correct police force to deal. I have taken advice from my Inspector and if a crime has occurred it will have to be investigated by the owning force area as previously given. This would need to be dealt in person by that Force.
Regards
Police Enquiry Centre
—–Original Message—–
From: butlincat . [mailto:adamski2012@hotmail.co..uk]
Sent: 11 May 2011 13:56
To: .Enquiries
Subject: FW: paedophiles

I am also surprised youve said:
“…instead of sending this type of email to a vast number of random people.”
as I certainly never intimated that at all and I doubt very much if this statement is anywhere near the truth.
A typo exists in my message – that being it is only Favour Musa who has not been seen by anybody for nearly 10 months, probably because she has complained about sexual molestation at a placement address. Also I have paperwork to suggest an E.P.O. is being sought by party connected to the family.
If I have heard nothing from you within 24 hours I will notify the Chief Constable etc.

Thank you.
J. Graham.

www.youtube.com/butlincat2
www.myspace.com/butlincat/blog
www.facebook.com/butlincat

——————————————————————————–
From: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
To: enquiries@dorset.pnn.police.uk
Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:41:05 +0100
The emailer did not send it to numerous people to my knowledge, but to only me presumably as he was very worried. His local police are implicit in the many crimes involved in the taking of the 5 children.
Note: I repeat – Chiwar Musa is unable to go to his local police as they removed the children in the 1st pllace on false allegations given by Haringey council, so it is impossible for him to go to his local police. Nobody has seen the children from the family for 10 months how, and in the past the daughter has claimed if being molested at the care home.
I have notified you of potential crimes.Please forward the name of your superintendant or Chief Constable so I may contact him / them about this serious matter.
Thank you.
J. Graham.

ace.com/butlincat/blog
www.facebook.com/butlincat

——————————————————————————–
Subject: RE: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:30:41 +0100
From: Enquiries@Dorset.PNN.Police.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

Hi John
I would have thought that the emailer should or would contact the local police instead of sending this type of email to a vast number of random people. I presume you have no knowledge of the emailer.
Regards
Karen
Police Enquiry Centre
—–Original Message—–
From: butlincat . [mailto:adamski2012@hotmail.co..uk]
Sent: 11 May 2011 13:19
To: .Enquiries
Subject: FW: paedophiles

This email below i received at the time / date shown – sincerely – John Graham
——————————————————————————–
The alarming message sent to me that I reported yet nothing was done by the police or Chief Constable:
From: musa91@hotmail.co.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.ukbutlincat75@googlemail.com
Subject: paedophiles
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:56:57 +0000
This was fowardeded to me





HELP ! FAVOUR MUSA AGE 10 IS BEING ABUSED BY A GANG OF PAEDOPHILES !

LAST KNOWN ADDRESS WAS 21 MEMSTEAD ROAD ,ERITH, KENT , DA8 3LA

Since August 2010 her parents have been forbidden by Harringey Council to see or phone her;

Haringey Council have refused her aunts, uncles and,grandparents (9 family members in all) any contact with Favour even though they all came especially from Africa to see her !
She has 5 sisters and a brother ,and none of them have seen her for weeks !

Even the Ambassador WAS REFUSED PERMISSION !

Favour needs YOUR HELP !! SHE IS IN TERRIBLE DANGER BECAUSE SHE DARED TO REPORT BEING ABUSED WHILE “IN CARE” !!

HARRINGEY cannot afford another scandal after the deaths of Baby P,and Victoria Climbé
They will stop at nothing to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds !

We do not know if she is alive or dead !! PLEASE,PLEASE, find and contact Favour , she is in the hands of PAEDOPHILES who are WICKED AND VERY DANGEROUS !!



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment